Then the monk to whom she went, imploring him to write to Rome:--

"He meets the first cold sprinkle of the world

And shudders to the marrow, 'Save this child?

Oh, my superiors, oh, the Archbishop here!

Who was it dared lay hand upon the ark

His betters saw fall nor put finger forth?'"

Worst of all, the Convent of the Convertites, women to whom she was

consigned for help,

"They do help; they are prompt to testify

To her pure life and saintly dying days.

She dies, and lo, who seemed so poor, proves rich!

What does the body that lives through helpfulness

To women for Christ's sake? The kiss turns bite,

The dove's note changes to the crow's cry: judge!

'Seeing that this our Convent claims of right

What goods belong to those we succour, be

The same proved women of dishonest life,--

And seeing that this Trial made appear

Pompilia was in such predicament,--

The Convent hereupon pretends to said

Succession of Pompilia, issues writ,

And takes possession by the Fisc's advice.'

Such is their attestation to the cause

Of Christ, who had one saint at least, they hoped:

But, is a title-deed to filch, a corpse

To slander, and an infant-heir to cheat?

Christ must give up his gains then! They unsay

All the fine speeches,--who was saint is whore."

It is not wonderful if his review of all the mean and dolorous

circumstance of this cycle of wrong brings the Pope face to face with

the unconquerable problem for the Christian believer, the keystone

of the grim arch of religious doubt and despair, through which the

courageous soul must needs pass to creeds of reason and life. Where is

"the gloriously decisive change, the immeasurable metamorphosis" in

human worth that should in some sort justify the consummate price that

had been paid for man these seventeen hundred years before?

"Had a mere adept of the Rosy Cross

Spent his life to consummate the Great Work,

Would not we start to see the stuff it touched

Yield not a grain more than the vulgar got

By the old smelting-process years ago?

If this were sad to see in just the sage

Who should profess so much, perform no more,

What is it when suspected in that Power

Who undertook to make and made the world,

Devised and did effect man, body and soul,

Ordained salvation for them both, and yet ...

Well, is the thing we see, salvation?"

It is certain that by whatever other deficiencies it may be marked

_The Ring and the Book_ is blameless for the most characteristic of

all the shortcomings of contemporary verse, a grievous sterility of

thought. And why? Because sterility of thought is the blight struck

into the minds of men by timorous and halt-footed scepticism, by a

half-hearted dread of what chill thing the truth might prove itself,

by unmanly reluctance or moral incapacity to carry the faculty of

poetic vision over the whole field; and because Mr. Browning's

intelligence, on the other hand, is masculine and courageous, moving

cheerfully on the solid earth of an articulate and defined conviction,

and careful not to omit realities from the conception of the great

drama, merely for being unsightly to the too fastidious eye,

or jarring in the ear, or too bitterly perplexing to faith or

understanding. It is this resolute feeling after and grip of fact

which is at the root of his distinguishing fruitfulness of thought,

and it is exuberance of thought, spontaneous, well-marked, and sapid,

that keeps him out of poetical preaching, on the one hand, and mere

making of music, on the other. Regret as we may the fantastic rudeness

and unscrupulous barbarisms into which Mr. Browning's art too often

falls, and find what fault we may with his method, let us ever

remember how much he has to say, and how effectively he communicates

the shock of new thought which was first imparted to him by the

vivid conception of a large and far-reaching story. The value of the

thought, indeed, is not to be measured by poetic tests; but still the

thought has poetic value, too, for it is this which has stirred in the

writer that keen yet impersonal interest in the actors of his story

and in its situations which is one of the most certain notes of

true dramatic feeling, and which therefore gives the most unfailing

stimulus to the interest of the appreciative reader.

At first sight _The Ring and the Book_ appears to be absolutely wanting

in that grandeur which, in a composition of such enormous length,

criticism must pronounce to be a fundamental and indispensable element.

In an ordinary way this effect of grandeur is produced either by some

heroic action surrounded by circumstances of worthy stateliness, as in

the finest of the Greek plays; or as in _Paradise Lost_ by the presence

of personages of majestic sublimity of bearing and association; or as in

_Faust_ or _Hamlet_ by the stupendous moral abysses which the poet

discloses fitfully on this side and that. None of these things are to be

found in _The Ring and the Book_ The action of Caponsacchi, though noble

and disinterested, is hardly heroic in the highest dramatic sense, for

it is not much more than the lofty defiance of a conventionality, the

contemplated penalty being only small; not, for example, as if life or

ascertained happiness had been the fixed or even probable price of his

magnanimous enterprise. There was no marching to the stake, no

deliberate encountering of the mightier risks, no voluntary submission

to a lifelong endurance. True, this came in the end, but it was an end

unforeseen, and one, therefore, not to be associated with the first

conception of the original act. Besides, Guido is so saturated with

hateful and ignoble motive as to fill the surrounding air with

influences that preclude heroic association. It has been said of the

great men to whom the Byzantine Empire once or twice gave birth, that

even their fame has a curiously tarnished air, as if that too had been

touched by the evil breath of the times. And in like manner we may say

of Guido Franceschini that even to have touched him in the way of

resistance detracts from pure heroism. Perhaps the same consideration

explains the comparative disappointment which most people seem to have

felt with _Pompilia_ in the third volume. Again, there is nothing which

can be rightly called majesty of character visible in one personage or

another. There is high devotion in Caponsacchi, a large-minded and free

sagacity in Pope Innocent, and around Pompilia the tragic pathos of an

incurable woe, which by its intensity might raise her to grandeur if it

sprang from some more solemn source than the mere malignity and baseness

of an unworthy oppressor. Lastly, there is nothing in _The Ring and the

Book_ of that "certain incommensurableness" which Goethe found in his

own _Faust_. The poem is kept closely concrete and strictly

commensurable by the very framework of its story:--

"pure crude fact,

Secreted from man's life when hearts beat hard,

And brains, high-blooded, ticked two centuries since."

It moves from none of the supernatural agencies which give the impulse

to our interest in _Faust_, nor from the sublimer passions and

yearning after things unspeakable alike in _Faust_ and in _Hamlet._

Yet, notwithstanding its lack of the accustomed elements of grandeur,

there is a profound impressiveness about _The Ring and the Book_

which must arise from the presence of some other fine compensating

or equivalent quality. Perhaps one may say that this equivalent for

grandeur is a certain simple touching of our sense of human kinship,

of the large identity of the conditions of the human lot, of the

piteous fatalities which bring the lives of the great multitude of men

to be little more than "grains of sand to be blown by the wind." This

old woe, the poet says, now in the fulness of the days again lives,

"_If precious be the soul of man to man_."

This is the deeply implanted sentiment to which his poem makes

successful appeal. Nor is it mocked by mere outpouring of scorn on the

blind and fortuitous groping of men and societies of men after truth

and justice and traces of the watchfulness of "the unlidded eye of

God." Rather it is this inability to see beyond the facts of our

condition to some diviner, ever-present law, which helps to knit us to

our kind, our brethren "whom we have seen."

"Clouds obscure--

But for which obscuration all were bright?

Too hastily concluded! Sun-suffused,

A cloud may soothe the eye made blind by blaze,--

Better the very clarity of heaven:

The soft streaks are the beautiful and dear.

What but the weakness in a faith supplies

The incentive to humanity, no strength

Absolute, irresistible, comports?

How can man love but what he yearns to help

And that which men think weakness within strength

But angels know for strength and stronger get--

What were it else but the first things made new,

But repetition of the miracle,

The divine instance of self-sacrifice

That never ends and aye begins for man?"

Studies in Literature · 第 15 / 18 题