CHAPTER XIII. SPANISH DERELICTS IN THE NEW WORLD

It fell to the last, and perhaps least talented, President of the

Virginia Dynasty to consummate the work of Jefferson and Madison by a

final settlement with Spain which left the United States in possession

of the Floridas. In the diplomatic service James Monroe had exhibited

none of those qualities which warranted the expectation that he would

succeed where his predecessors had failed. On his missions to England

and Spain, indeed, he had been singularly inept, but he had learned much

in the rude school of experience, and he now brought to his new duties

discretion, sobriety, and poise. He was what the common people held

him to be a faithful public servant, deeply and sincerely republican,

earnestly desirous to serve the country which he loved.

The circumstances of Monroe's election pledged him to a truly national

policy. He had received the electoral votes of all but three States. *

He was now President of an undivided country, not merely a Virginian

fortuitously elevated to the chief magistracy and regarded as alien in

sympathy to the North and East. Any doubts on this point were dispelled

by the popular demonstrations which greeted him on his tour through

Federalist strongholds in the Northeast. "I have seen enough," he wrote

in grateful recollection, "to satisfy me that the great mass of our

fellow-citizens in the Eastern States are as firmly attached to the

union and republican government as I have always believed or could

desire them to be." The news-sheets which followed his progress from

day to day coined the phrase, "era of good feeling," which has passed

current ever since as a characterization of his administration.

* Monroe received 183 electoral votes and Rufus King, 34--

the votes of Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Delaware.

It was in this admirable temper and with this broad national outlook

that Monroe chose his advisers and heads of departments. He was

well aware of the common belief that his predecessors had appointed

Virginians to the Secretaryship of State in order to prepare the way

for their succession to the Presidency. He was determined, therefore,

to avert the suspicion of sectional bias by selecting some one from the

Eastern States, rather than from the South or from the West, hitherto

so closely allied to the South. His choice fell upon John Quincy Adams,

"who by his age, long experience in our foreign affairs, and adoption

into the Republican party," he assured Jefferson, "seems to have

superior pretentions." It was an excellent appointment from every point

of view but one. Monroe had overlooked--and the circumstance did

him infinite credit--the exigencies of politics and passed over an

individual whose vaulting ambition had already made him an aspirant to

the Presidency. Henry Clay was grievously disappointed and henceforward

sulked in his tent, refusing the Secretaryship of War which the

President tendered. Eventually the brilliant young John C. Calhoun took

this post. This South Carolinian was in the prime of life, full of

fire and dash, ardently patriotic, and nationally-minded to an

unusual degree. Of William H. Crawford of Georgia, who retained the

Secretaryship of the Treasury, little need be said except that he also

was a presidential aspirant who saw things always from the angle of

political expediency. Benjamin W. Crowninshield as Secretary of the

Navy and William Wirt as Attorney-General completed the circle of the

President's intimate advisers.

The new Secretary of State had not been in office many weeks before he

received a morning call from Don Luis de Onis, the Spanish Minister, who

was laboring under ill-disguised excitement. It appeared that his house

in Washington had been repeatedly "insulted" of late-windows broken,

lamps in front of the house smashed, and one night a dead fowl tied to

his bell-rope. This last piece of vandalism had been too much for his

equanimity. He held it a gross insult to his sovereign and the Spanish

monarchy, importing that they were of no more consequence than a dead

old hen! Adams, though considerably amused, endeavored to smooth the

ruffled pride of the chevalier by suggesting that these were probably

only the tricks of some mischievous boys; but De Onis was not easily

appeased. Indeed, as Adams was himself soon to learn, the American

public did regard the Spanish monarchy as a dead old hen, and took no

pains to disguise its contempt. Adams had yet to learn the long train

of circumstances which made Spanish relations the most delicate and

difficult of all the diplomatic problems in his office.

With his wonted industry, Adams soon made himself master of the facts

relating to Spanish diplomacy. For the moment interest centered on

East Florida. Carefully unraveling the tangled skein of events, Adams

followed the thread which led back to President Madison's secret message

to Congress of January 3,1811, which was indeed one of the landmarks in

American policy. Madison had recommended a declaration "that the

United States could not see without serious inquietude any part of

a neighboring territory [like East Florida] in which they have in

different respects so deep and so just a concern pass from the hands of

Spain into those of any other foreign power." To prevent the possible

subversion of Spanish authority in East Florida and the occupation of

the province by a foreign power--Great Britain was, of course, the power

the President had in mind--he had urged Congress to authorize him to

take temporary possession "in pursuance of arrangements which may

be desired by the Spanish authorities." Congress had responded with

alacrity and empowered the President to occupy East Florida in case the

local authorities should consent or a foreign power should attempt to

occupy it.

With equal dispatch the President had sent two agents, General George

Matthews and Colonel John McKee, on one of the strangest missions in the

border history of the United States.

East Florida--Adams found, pursuing his inquiries into the archives of

the department--included the two important ports of entry, Pensacola on

the Gulf and Fernandina on Amelia Island, at the mouth of the St. Mary's

River. The island had long been a notorious resort for smugglers. Hither

had come British and American vessels with cargoes of merchandise and

slaves, which found their way in mysterious fashion to consignees within

the States. A Spanish garrison of ten men was the sole custodian of law

and order on the island. Up and down the river was scattered a lawless

population of freebooters, who were equally ready to raid a border

plantation or to raise the Jolly Roger on some piratical cruise. To this

No Man's Land--fertile recruiting ground for all manner of filibustering

expeditions--General Matthews and Colonel McKee had betaken themselves

in the spring of 1811, bearing some explicit instructions from President

Madison but also some very pronounced convictions as to what they

were expected to accomplish. Matthews, at least, understood that the

President wished a revolution after the West Florida model. He assured

the Administration-Adams read the precious missive in the files of his

office-that he could do the trick. Only let the Government consign two

hundred stand of arms and fifty horsemen's swords to the commander at

St. Mary's, and he would guarantee to put the revolution through without

committing the United States in any way.

The melodrama had been staged for the following spring (1812). Some two

hundred "patriots" recruited from the border people gathered near St.

Mary's with souls yearning for freedom; and while American gunboats

took a menacing position, this force of insurgents had landed on Amelia

Island and summoned the Spanish commandant to surrender. Not willing

to spoil the scene by vulgar resistance, the commandant capitulated and

marched out his garrison, ten strong, with all the honors of war. The

Spanish flag had been hauled down to give place to the flag of the

insurgents, bearing the inspiring motto Salus populi--suprema lex.

Then General Matthews with a squad of regular United States troops had

crossed the river and taken possession. Only the benediction of the

Government at Washington was lacking to make the success of his mission

complete; but to the general's consternation no approving message

came, only a peremptory dispatch disavowing his acts and revoking his

commission.

As Adams reviewed these events, he could see no other alternative

for the Government to have pursued at this moment when war with Great

Britain was impending. It would have been the height of folly to break

openly with Spain. The Administration had indeed instructed its new

agent, Governor Mitchell of Georgia, to restore the island to the

Spanish commandant and to withdraw his troops, if he could do so without

sacrificing the insurgents to the vengeance of the Spaniards. But the

forces set in motion by Matthews were not so easily controlled from

Washington. Once having resolved to liberate East Florida, the patriots

were not disposed to retire at the nod of the Secretary of State. The

Spanish commandant was equally obdurate. He would make no promise to

spare the insurgents. The Legislature of Georgia, too, had a mind of its

own. It resolved that the occupation of East Florida was essential

to the safety of the State, whether Congress approved or no; and the

Governor, swept along in the current of popular feeling, summoned troops

from Savannah to hold the province. Just at this moment had come

the news of war with Great Britain; and Governor, State militia, and

patriots had combined in an effort to prevent East Florida from becoming

enemy's territory.

Military considerations had also swept the Administration along the same

hazardous course. The occupation of the Floridas seemed imperative. The

President sought authorization from Congress to occupy and govern both

the Floridas until the vexed question of title could be settled by

negotiation. Only a part of this programme had carried, for, while

Congress was prepared to approve the military occupation of West Florida

to the Perdido River, beyond that it would not go; and so with great

reluctance the President had ordered the troops to withdraw from Amelia

Island. In the spring of the same year (1813) General Wilkinson had

occupied West Florida--the only permanent conquest of the war and that,

oddly enough, the conquest of a territory owned and held by a power with

which the United States was not at war.

Abandoned by the American troops, Amelia Island had become a rendezvous

for outlaws from every part of the Americas. Just about the time

that Adams was crossing the ocean to take up his duties at the State

Department, one of these buccaneers by the name of Gregor MacGregor

descended upon the island as "Brigadier General of the Armies of the

United Provinces of New Granada and Venezuela, and General-in-chief of

that destined to emancipate the provinces of both Floridas, under the

commission of the Supreme Government of Mexico and South America." This

pirate was soon succeeded by General Aury, who had enjoyed a wild career

among the buccaneers of Galveston Bay, where he had posed as military

governor under the Republic of Mexico. East Florida in the hands of such

desperadoes was a menace to the American border. Approaching the problem

of East Florida without any of the prepossessions of those who had been

dealing with Spanish envoys for a score of years, the new Secretary of

State was prepared to move directly to his goal without any too great

consideration for the feelings of others. His examination of the facts

led him to a clean-cut decision: this nest of pirates must be broken up

at once. His energy carried President and Cabinet along with him. It was

decided to send troops and ships to the St. Mary's and if necessary to

invest Fernandina. This demonstration of force sufficed; General Aury

departed to conquer new worlds, and Amelia Island was occupied for the

second time without bloodshed.

But now, having grasped the nettle firmly, what was the Administration

to do with it? De Onis promptly registered his protest; the opposition

in Congress seized upon the incident to worry the President; many of

the President's friends thought that he had been precipitate. Monroe,

indeed, would have been glad to withdraw the troops now that they had

effected their object, but Adams was for holding the island in order to

force Spain to terms. With a frankness which lacerated the feelings of

De Onis, Adams insisted that the United States had acted strictly on the

defensive. The occupation of Amelia Island was not an act of aggression

but a necessary measure for the protection of commerce--American

commerce, the commerce of other nations, the commerce of Spain itself.

Now why not put an end to all friction by ceding the Floridas to the

United States? What would Spain take for all her possessions east of

the Mississippi, Adams asked. De Onis declined to say. Well, then, Adams

pursued, suppose the United States should withdraw from Amelia

Island, would Spain guarantee that it should not be occupied again by

free-booters? No: De Onis could give no such guarantee, but he would

write to the Governor of Havana to ascertain if he would send an

adequate garrison to Fernandina. Adams reported this significant

conversation to the President, who was visibly shaken by the conflict of

opinions within his political household and not a little alarmed at the

possibility of war with Spain. The Secretary of State was coolly taking

the measure of his chief. "There is a slowness, want of decision, and a

spirit of procrastination in the President," he confided to his diary.

He did not add, but the thought was in his mind, that he could sway

this President, mold him to his heart's desire. In this first trial of

strength the hardier personality won: Monroe sent a message to Congress,

on January 13, 1818, announcing his intention to hold East Florida for

the present, and the arguments which he used to justify this bold course

were precisely those of his Secretary of State.

When Adams suggested that Spain might put an end to all her worries by

ceding the Floridas, he was only renewing an offer that Monroe had made

while he was still Secretary of State. De Onis had then declared that

Spain would never cede territory east of the Mississippi unless the

United States would relinquish its claims west of that river. Now,

to the new Secretary, De Onis intimated that he was ready to be less

exacting. He would be willing to run the line farther west and allow the

United States a large part of what is now the State of Louisiana. Adams

made no reply to this tentative proposal but bided his time; and time

played into his hands in unexpected ways.

To the Secretary's office, one day in June, 1818, came a letter from De

Onis which was a veritable firebrand. De Onis, who was not unnaturally

disposed to believe the worst of Americans on the border, had heard that

General Andrew Jackson in pursuit of the Seminole Indians had crossed

into Florida and captured Pensacola and St. Mark's. He demanded to be

informed "in a positive, distinct and explicit manner just what had

occurred"; and then, outraged by confirmatory reports and without

waiting for Adams's reply, he wrote another angry letter, insisting upon

the restitution of the captured forts and the punishment of the American

general. Worse tidings followed. Bagot, the British Minister, had heard

that Jackson had seized and executed two British subjects on Spanish

soil. Would the Secretary of State inform him whether General Jackson

had been authorized to take Pensacola, and would the Secretary furnish

him with copies of the reports of the courts-martial which had condemned

these two subjects of His Majesty? Adams could only reply that he lacked

official information.

By the second week in July, dispatches from General Jackson confirmed

the worst insinuations and accusations of De Onis and Bagot. President

Monroe was painfully embarrassed. Prompt disavowal of the general's

conduct seemed the only way to avert war; but to disavow the acts of

this popular idol, the victor of New Orleans, was no light matter. He

sought the advice of his Cabinet and was hardly less embarrassed to

find all but one convinced that "Old Hickory" had acted contrary to

instructions and had committed acts of hostility against Spain. A week

of anxious Cabinet sessions followed, in which only one voice was raised

in defense of the invasion of Florida. All but Adams feared war, a war

which the opposition would surely brand as incited by the President

without the consent of Congress. No administration could carry on a war

begun in violation of the Constitution, said Calhoun. But, argued Adams,

the President may authorize defensive acts of hostility. Jackson had

been authorized to cross the frontier, if necessary, in pursuit of the

Indians, and all the ensuing deplorable incidents had followed as a

necessary consequence of Indian warfare.

The conclusions of the Cabinet were summed up by Adams in a reply to

De Onis, on the 23d of July, which must have greatly astonished that

diligent defender of Spanish honor. Opening the letter to read, as he

confidently expected, a disavowal and an offer of reparation, he found

the responsibility for the recent unpleasant incidents fastened upon his

own country. He was reminded that by the treaty of 1795 both Governments

had contracted to restrain the Indians within their respective borders,

so that neither should suffer from hostile raids, and that the Governor

of Pensacola, when called upon to break up a stronghold of Indians and

fugitive slaves, had acknowledged his obligation but had pleaded his

inability to carry out the covenant. Then, and then only, had General

Jackson been authorized to cross the border and to put an end to

outrages which the Spanish authorities lacked the power to prevent.

General Jackson had taken possession of the Spanish forts on his

own responsibility when he became convinced of the duplicity of the

commandant, who, indeed, had made himself "a partner and accomplice of

the hostile Indians and of their foreign instigators." Such conduct on

the part of His Majesty's officer justified the President in calling

for his punishment. But, in the meantime, the President was prepared to

restore Pensacola, and also St. Mark's, whenever His Majesty should send

a force sufficiently strong to hold the Indians under control.

Nor did the Secretary of State moderate his tone or abate his demands

when Pizarro, the Spanish Minister of Foreign Affairs, threatened

to suspend negotiations with the United States until it should give

satisfaction for this "shameful invasion of His Majesty's territory" and

for these "acts of barbarity glossed over with the forms of justice." In

a dispatch to the American Minister at Madrid, Adams vigorously defended

Jackson's conduct from beginning to end. The time had come, said he,

when "Spain must immediately make her election either to place a force

in Florida adequate at once to the protection of her territory and

to the fulfilment of her engagements or cede to the United States a

province of which she retains nothing but the nominal possession, but

which is in fact a derelict, open to the occupancy of every enemy,

civilized or savage, of the United States and serving no other earthly

purpose, than as a post of annoyance to them."

This affront to Spanish pride might have ended abruptly a chapter in

Spanish-American diplomacy but for the friendly offices of Hyde de

Neuville, the French Minister at Washington, whose Government could

not view without alarm the possibility of a rupture between the two

countries. It was Neuville who labored through the summer months of this

year, first with Adams, then with De Onis, tempering the demands of the

one and placating the pride of the other, but never allowing intercourse

to drop. Adams was right, and both Neuville and De Onis knew it; the

only way to settle outstanding differences was to cede these Spanish

derelicts in the New World to the United States.

To bring and keep together these two antithetical personalities,

representatives of two opposing political systems, was no small

achievement. What De Onis thought of his stubborn opponent may be

surmised; what the American thought of the Spaniard need not be left to

conjecture. In the pages of his diary Adams painted the portrait of his

adversary as he saw him--"cold, calculating, wily, always commanding

his temper, proud because he is a Spaniard but supple and cunning,

accommodating the tone of his pretensions precisely to the degree of

endurance of his opponents, bold and overbearing to the utmost extent to

which it is tolerated, careless of what he asserts or how grossly it is

proved to be unfounded."

The history of the negotiations running through the fall and winter is

a succession of propositions and counter-propositions, made formally by

the chief participants or tentatively and informally through Neuville.

The western boundary of the Louisiana purchase was the chief obstacle to

agreement. Each sparred for an advantage; each made extreme claims; and

each was persuaded to yield a little here and a little there, slowly

narrowing the bounds of the disputed territory. More than once the

President and the Cabinet believed that the last concession had been

extorted and were prepared to yield on other matters. When the President

was prepared, for example, to accept the hundredth meridian and the

forty-third parallel, Adams insisted on demanding the one hundred and

second and the forty-second; and "after a long and violent struggle,"

wrote Adams, "he [De Onis]. .. agreed to take longitude one hundred from

the Red River to the Arkansas, and latitude forty-two from the source of

the Arkansas to the South Sea." This was a momentous decision, for the

United States acquired thus whatever claim Spain had to the northwest

coast but sacrificed its claim to Texas for the possession of the

Floridas.

Vexatious questions still remained to be settled. The spoliation claims

which were to have been adjusted by the convention of 1802 were

finally left to a commission, the United States agreeing to assume all

obligations to an amount not exceeding five million dollars. De Onis

demurred at stating this amount in the treaty: he would be blamed for

having betrayed the honor of Spain by selling the Floridas for a paltry

five millions. To which Adams replied dryly that he ought to boast of

his bargain instead of being ashamed of it, since it was notorious

that the Floridas had always been a burden to the Spanish exchequer.

Negotiations came to a standstill again when Adams insisted that certain

royal grants of land in the Floridas should be declared null and void.

He feared, and not without reason, that these grants would deprive the

United States of the domain which was to be used to pay the indemnities

assumed in the treaty. De Onis resented the demand as "offensive to

the dignity and imprescriptible rights of the Crown of Spain"; and

once again Neuville came to the rescue of the treaty and persuaded both

parties to agree to a compromise. On the understanding that the royal

grants in question had been made subsequent to January 24, 1818, Adams

agreed that all grants made since that date (when the first proposal was

made by His Majesty for the cession of the Floridas) should be declared

null and void; and that all grants made before that date should be

confirmed.

On the anniversary of Washington's birthday, De Onis and Adams signed

the treaty which carried the United States to its natural limits on

the southeast. The event seemed to Adams to mark "a great epocha in our

history." "It was near one in the morning," he recorded in his diary,

"when I closed the day with ejaculations of fervent gratitude to

the Giver of all good. It was, perhaps, the most important day of my

life.... Let no idle and unfounded exultation take possession of my

mind, as if I would ascribe to my own foresight or exertions any portion

of the event." But misgivings followed hard on these joyous reflections.

The treaty had still to be ratified, and the disposition of the Spanish

Cortes was uncertain. There was, too, considerable opposition in the

Senate. "A watchful eye, a resolute purpose, a calm and patient temper,

and a favoring Providence will all be as indispensable for the future

as they have been for the past in the management of this negotiation,"

Adams reminded himself. He had need of all these qualities in the trying

months that followed.

Jefferson and His Colleagues: A Chronicle of the Virginia Dynasty · 第 13 / 15 章