CHAPTER 4

THE FIRST MARTYR

The world turns and the world changes,

But one thing does not change.

In all of my years, one thing does not change.

However you disguise it, this thing does not change:

The perpetual struggle of Good and Evil.

--T. S. Eliot

Lady Sheil, whose husband was the British envoy in Ṭihrán,[BC]

states in her book, _Glimpses of Life and Manners in Persia_, that the

Báb declared His mission in Káẓimayn, near Ba[_gh_]dád, and that

'Incensed at this blasphemy, the Turkish authorities issued orders for

his execution, but he was claimed by the Persian consul as a subject

of the Shah, and sent to his native place'.[1] Obviously Lady Sheil

was confused. She had heard of the arrest of Mullá `Alíy-i-Basṭámí

in `Iráq and of his imprisonment. She mistook him for the Báb.

[Footnote BC: See note 6, Prologue.]

Mullá `Alí, as we have seen, was directed to `Iráq by the Báb, and took

with him a copy of the _Qayyúmu'l-Asmá'_, the commentary on the Súrih of

Yúsuf (Joseph). The news and the message that he gave aroused eager

interest and ready response from his hearers. But hostile reaction was

also swift. It was Mullá `Alí who, in Karbilá, informed Qurratu'l-`Ayn

of the advent of the Báb. He was not at liberty to mention His Name. We

do not know whether, in view of the fact that Qurratu'l-`Ayn had been

elevated to the high and honoured position of a Letter of the Living,

Mullá `Alí gave her any information other than the tidings of the

appearance of the Báb. The disciples of Siyyid Káẓim were in a much

stronger position there than in Najaf, in spite of the fact that in

Karbilá they had a redoubtable opponent in the person of Siyyid

Ibráhím-i-Qazvíní. There in Karbilá, Mullá `Alí remained safe. But the

story was different in Najaf. Nabíl-i-A`ẓam writes:

In the presence of [_Sh_]ay[_kh_] Muḥammad-Ḥasan, one

of the most celebrated ecclesiastics of [_sh_]í`ah Islám,

and in the face of a distinguished company of his disciples,

Mullá `Alí announced fearlessly the manifestation of the

Báb, the Gate whose advent they were eagerly awaiting. 'His

proof,' he declared, 'is His Word; His testimony, none other

than the testimony with which Islám seeks to vindicate its

truth. From the pen of this unschooled Há[_sh_]imite Youth

of Persia there have streamed, within the space of

forty-eight hours, as great a number of verses, of prayers,

of homilies, and scientific treatises, as would equal in

volume the whole of the Qur'án, which it took Muḥammad,

the Prophet of God, twenty-three years to reveal!' That

proud and fanatic leader, instead of welcoming, in an age of

darkness and prejudice, these life-giving evidences of a

new-born Revelation, forthwith pronounced Mullá `Alí a

heretic and expelled him from the assembly. His disciples

and followers, even the [_Sh_]ay[_kh_]ís, who already

testified to Mullá `Alí's piety, sincerity, and learning,

endorsed, unhesitatingly, the judgment against him. The

disciples of [_Sh_]ay[_kh_] Muḥammad-Ḥasan, joining

hands with their adversaries, heaped upon him untold

indignities. They eventually delivered him, his hands bound

in chains, to an official of the Ottoman government,

arraigning him as a wrecker of Islám, a calumniator of the

Prophet, an instigator of mischief, a disgrace to the Faith,

and worthy of the penalty of death. He was taken to

Ba[_gh_]dád under the escort of government officials, and

was cast into prison by the governor of that city.[2]

Áqá Muḥammad-Muṣṭafáy-i-Ba[_gh_]dádí,[3] in a short

autobiography which he wrote at the instance of Mírzá Abu'l-Faḍí,

describes Mullá `Alí's arrival in `Iráq and the events which followed:

The messenger, Mullá `Alí al-Basṭámí,[BD] reached Kúfih

in the year A.H. 1260 [A.D. 1844] and distributed books,

treatises and tablets amongst the divines. Due to this a

body of the divines in Najaf and Karbilá were seized with

consternation. They arose in opposition and stirred

themselves to vociferous denunciation. The Government

hearing of what had transpired, became concerned lest

disorders might ensue, and deemed it politic to imprison the

messenger, confiscate the books and tablets in his

possession and send him to the seat of the province, that is

Ba[_gh_]dád. The Válí, at that time, was Najíb Pá[_sh_]á,

the same man who captured Karbilá....[BE]

When the messenger reached Ba[_gh_]dád the Válí kept him in

prison and placed the books and the treatises in the

council-chamber. My father, [_Sh_]ay[_kh_] Muḥammad,

visited the messenger every day in the prison, and heard the

Word of God from him for three months. Whatever he heard he

imparted to those who were seekers, so that, during this

short time, a large number of people came to believe.

[_Sh_]ay[_kh_] Ba[_sh_]ír an-Najafí was one of them, a

mujtahid seventy-five years old. Then there were

[_Sh_]ay[_kh_] Sulṭán al-Karbilá'í and a group with him

in Karbilá; Siyyid Muḥammad-Ja`far, Siyyid Ḥasan

Ja`far, and Siyyid `Alí Bi[_sh_]r and a group with him in

the town of Káẓimíyyah; [_Sh_]ay[_kh_] Muḥammad

[_Sh_]ibl [the author's father], Siyyid Muḥsin

al-Káẓimí, [_Sh_]ay[_kh_] Ṣáliḥ al-Karímí and a

group with them of villagers like [_Sh_]ay[_kh_] `Abbás,

Mullá Maḥmúd, `Abdu'l-Hádí and Mihdí....

When the Government noticed that the Cause was gaining

ground day by day, the afore-mentioned Válí, Najíb

Pá[_sh_]á, ordered the divines of all the regions to come to

Ba[_gh_]dád....[4] They summoned my father, [_Sh_]ay[_kh_]

Muḥammad, to present himself. But my father left

Ba[_gh_]dád in disguise, because he had learned that the

Válí intended to make him give witness against the Cause of

the Day of Judgment. They brought the messenger to this

terrible assembly and asked him who the Lord of the Cause

was. He answered: 'The awaited Spirit of Truth hath come. He

is the One promised in the Books of God.' Then he read them

some verses and prayers and called upon them to believe. It

went hard with them to accept the Cause. They arose to deny

and to reject it, full of haughtiness. They agreed to

denounce the messenger as a heretic and passed the sentence

of death upon him, and thus ended that assemblage of ill

omen. The Válí sent the account of the proceedings to the

Sublime Porte, whence came the orders that the messenger

should be sent in fetters, together with his books, to the

capital. The messenger languished for six months in the gaol

of Ba[_gh_]dád and was then dispatched to the Sublime Porte,

under escort, by way of Mosul. The fame of the Cause was

noised abroad in Mosul, and when he passed Mosul nothing

more was heard of him.[5]

[Footnote BD: Áqá Muḥammad-Muṣṭafá wrote in Arabic.]

[Footnote BE: See Prologue I.]

The circumstances of Mullá `Alí's arrest were also noted by Major

Henry Rawlinson,[6] then British Political Agent in Ba[_gh_]dád, who,

on January 8th 1845, reported to Sir Stratford Canning, the Ambassador

in Istanbul:

I have the honor to report for Your Excellency's information

the following circumstances which are at present causing

much excitement at this place, and which threaten in their

consequences to give rise to renewed misunderstanding

between the Persian & Turkish Govts.

About three months ago, an inferior priest of Shiraz

appeared in Kerbela, bearing a copy of the Koran, which he

stated to have been delivered to him, by the forerunner of

the Imam Mehdi, to be exhibited in token of his approaching

advent. The book proved on examination to have been altered

and interpolated in many essential passages, the object

being, to prepare the Mohammedan world for the immediate

manifestation of the Imam, and to identify the individual to

whom the emendations of the text were declared to have been

revealed, as his inspired & true precursor. It was in

consequence pronounced by a part of the Sheeah divines at

Nejef and Kerbela, to be a blasphemous production, and the

priest of Shiraz was warned by them of the danger; which he

incurred in giving currency to its contents--but a

considerable section nevertheless of the Sheeahs of Nejef,

who under the name of _Usúlí_, or 'Transcendentalists', have

lately risen into notice as the disciples of the High Priest

Sheikh Kazem, and who are in avowed expectation of the

speedy advent of the Imam, adopted the proposed readings,

and declared themselves ready to join the Precursor; as soon

as he should appear amongst them--These parties owing to

local dissensions, were shortly afterwards denounced to the

Govt. by the orthodox Sheeas as heretics, and attention

being thus drawn to the perverted copy of the Koran, upon

which they rested their belief, the volume was seized & its

bearer being brought to Bagdad, was cast into prison, as a

blasphemer against Islam and a disturber of the public

peace.[BF][7]

[Footnote BF: Major Rawlinson nowhere mentions the name of

the priest who is alleged to have been the possessor of a

'spurious' version of the Qur'án. It is obvious that the

priest, about whom he was writing, could have been none other

than Mullá `Alíy-i-Basṭámí, whom he wrongly designated as

'Shirazee' for the simple reason that he had come from

[_Sh_]íráz. His frequent references to the disciples of

Siyyid Káẓim as '_Usúlí_' indicate that his knowledge of

the issue was meagre, for these disciples were known as

[_Sh_]ay[_kh_]ís. The term could have been more appropriately

applied to the opponents of Siyyid Káẓim. They and their

counterpart, the 'A[_kh_]bárís', followed different methods

of interpretation within the [_Sh_]í`ah fold. For a

description of these schools of thought, see Browne, _A

Literary History of Persia_, Vol. IV, pp. 374-6.]

Mullá `Alí was the first martyr of the Bábí Faith. Though his arrest

and sufferings lasted only a few months, he was the centre of

conjecture, the subject of official report, and the cause of increased

rancour between the Sunní and [_Sh_]í`ah sects, and the Ottoman and

Iranian governments. European officials who were drawn into this

obscure drama included Major Rawlinson, who submitted frequent and

lengthy reports to Sir Stratford Canning in Istanbul and Lt.-Col.

Sheil in Ṭihrán, and received their advice and instructions; M. de

Titow, Russian envoy in Istanbul who joined Canning in urging the

Sublime Porte to restrain Najíb Pá[_sh_]á from putting 'the Persian

Priest' to death, and instead to inflict on him only 'the mildest

punishment consistent with the public tranquillity'; and Lord

Aberdeen, the British Foreign Secretary in London, who was apprised of

the final outcome.

Although the dispatches of Major Rawlinson are in certain aspects

subject to grave reservations, for his knowledge was sometimes meagre

and at second hand, even inaccurate, they do portray the agitation,

confusion and opposition created by the claim of the Báb and the

teaching of Mullá `Alí. Thus he wrote to Canning:

The Soonnee Priesthood have taken up the case in a rancorous

spirit of bigotry, and their inveteracy has enlisted the

sympathies of the entire Sheeah sect, in favor of the

imprisoned Persian ... the question has now become one of

virulent contest, between the Soonee & Sheeah sects, or

which is the same thing in this part of the Ottoman Empire,

between the Turkish & Persian population....[8]

It was the Governor (Válí) of Ba[_gh_]dád, Najíb Pá[_sh_]á, who bore

the responsibility of controlling these passions; but being himself a

fanatical Sunní, he was resolved that the [_Sh_]í`ahs should submit to

the Sunní authority, and determined to bar any intrusions of the

Persians into the affairs of his Pá[_sh_]álik.[BG] Nevertheless, as

reported by Rawlinson:

Nejib Pasha at the same time, to give all due formality to

his proceedings, and to divest the affair of the appearance

of mere sectarian persecution, has brought in the chief

Priests from Nejef & Kerbela, to hold a solemn Court of

Inquisition in conjunction with the heads of the Soonnee

religion in Bagdad, but I do not anticipate much benefit

from this compulsory & most unwilling attendance of the

former parties--They will probably make an effort to save

the life of their unfortunate countryman, proposing the

banishment of the messenger and of the heads of the _Usúlí_

sect, as the simplest method of suppressing the heresy, but

they will be intimidated & overruled....[9]

[Footnote BG: His province.]

Indeed, such an unwieldy court of Sunní and [_Sh_]í`ah divines could

come to no agreement about Mullá `Alí's punishment. On January 16th

1845, Rawlinson wrote to Sheil, in Ṭihrán:

The Court of Inquisition convened for the trial of the

Persian priest, was held on Monday last [January 13th], H.E.

Nejib Pasha presiding, and Moola Abdool Azeez being also

present, to afford his countenance to the accused--The

perverted copy of the Koran being produced in Court, was

unanimously condemned as a blasphemous production, and

parties avowing a belief in the readings which it continued

[sic], were declared to be liable to the punishment of

death--It was then argued whether or not the Shirazee had

thus avowed his belief in a blasphemous production--he

himself distinctly repudiated the charge, and although

witnesses were brought forward, who stated that he had in

their presence declared his adoption of the spurious text,

of which he was the bearer, yet as there was reason to

suspect the fidelity of their evidence, the Sheeah divines

were disposed to give him the benefit of his present

disavowal--After much discussion the Soonee law-officers

adjudged the culprit to be convicted of blasphemy & passed

sentence of death on him accordingly, while the Sheeahs

returned a verdict, that he was only guilty of the

dissemination of blasphemy, & liable in consequence to no

heavier punishment than imprisonment or banishment....

To this Rawlinson added:

I understand that considerable uneasiness is beginning to

display itself at Kerbela & Nejef, in regard to the expected

manifestation of the Imam, and I am apprehensive that the

measures now in progress will rather increase than allay the

excitement.[BH][10]

[Footnote BH: Rawlinson's letter to Sheil carries the

statement that Mullá `Alí abjured his faith. Apart from the

evidence of the devotion and heroism of the disciples of the

Báb, which history amply provides, several factors must be

considered. Major Rawlinson was not present at that meeting

of the divines, which he termed 'the Court of Inquisition'.

Therefore his information was secondhand. The emergence of

Sunní-[_Sh_]í`ah antagonism was another factor which would

certainly have clouded the issue. The 'advent of the Imam'

need not, necessarily, have troubled the Sunní conscience,

because Sunnís have never believed in the Imámate and the

occultation of the Twelfth Imám. Furthermore, that which

Mullá `Alí is supposed to have rejected, according to

Rawlinson, was a 'perverted copy of the Koran'. Would Mullá

`Alí ever have an interpolated copy of the Qur'án to announce

the message he had to give, or to prove it? And then the

question must also be asked: if Mullá `Alí, the man who

brought the news of the advent of the Báb, had recanted, how

was it that 'considerable uneasiness' was becoming

perceptible in Karbilá and Najaf, 'in regard to the expected

manifestation of the Imam'?]

The personal intervention of Najíb Pá[_sh_]á had served also to

influence the course of events in another way. By referring the matter

to the Sublime Porte, he prevented the extradition of the Persian

prisoner to his native land, as requested by the Iranian Prime

Minister, Ḥájí Mírzá Áqásí.

A similar request for the transfer of Mullá `Alí to Persian

jurisdiction was made to Major Rawlinson by the Governor of

Kirmán[_sh_]áh, Muḥibb-`Alí [_Kh_]án, for, as he wrote:

In the first place it is improper to arrest and imprison

anyone on a mere accusation, which may be true or

false,--and in the second place, supposing that he (the

Shirázee) were guilty; as a subject of the exalted Govt. of

Persia, he ought not to be subject to arrest--if his crime

were proved, his punishment should be that of banishment

from the Turkish territory--I have therefore considered it

necessary to represent this matter to you my friend, and to

request that, as a well wisher to the preservation of

friendship between the two Governments, You will communicate

with H. Excy. Nejib Pasha on the subject, and will suggest

to him, that if the guilt of the Persian be fully

substantiated, he may be sent to Kermanshah, in order that I

may transfer him to Tehran for punishment--and if on the

other hand, the accusations against him prove to be

malicious and without foundation, he may be at once released

and set at liberty.

Under any circumstances his continued imprisonment is

unbecoming and contrary (to custom).[11]

This request was duly submitted by Rawlinson to Najíb Pá[_sh_]á but,

as the Governor had already referred the matter to the Sublime Porte

after the religious court's examination, the prisoner remained in

Turkish custody.

It was on April 15th that Rawlinson reported to Canning that 'Nejib

Pasha received orders by yesterday's post to transmit to Constantinople

the Persian priest who has been in confinement for the last 3 months at

Bagdad.... His Excy. is preparing to obey these instructions with all

available despatch.' He also says in the same letter:

... [the] more in fact these Mujtiheds[BI] are degraded by

the Turkish Govt., the more complete, I think, will be their

ascendancy over the minds of their disciples and the only

results, therefore, which are likely to attend the

proscription of their public duties, are the more complete

isolation of the Persian community of this province, and an

increase of the rancorous feeling with which the dominant

Soonee party is regarded--[12]

[Footnote BI: [_Sh_]í`ah divines.]

On the last day of April, Rawlinson wrote once more to Canning:

I take this opportunity of reporting that the Persian priest

of Shiraz so long detained in confinement at this place, was

sent a prisoner to Constantinople in company with the

Tartar[BJ] who conveyed the last Bagdad post.[13]

[Footnote BJ: Official courier.]

Meanwhile, as early as February, Major Rawlinson came to an erroneous

conclusion about the Báb, which subsequent events belied. He wrote to

Canning on the 18th:

... the excitement which has been for some time prevalent in

this vicinity among the Sheeah sect in connection with the

expected manifestation of the Imam Mehdi, is beginning

gradually to subside, the impostor who personated the

character of the forerunner of the Imam ... having been

deterred by a sense of personal danger from a further

prosecution of the agitation, which he set on foot at

Kerbela in the Autumn on his passage from Persia to

Mecca.[14]

He was also in error in stating to Sheil, ten days later, that 'the

impostor ... joined as a private individual the Caravan of pilgrims

which is travelling to Persia by the route of Damascus and Aleppo'.[15]

In considering this episode of the arrest, imprisonment and banishment

of the first Bábí martyr, there are four aspects which deserve special

note. First is the fact that while the Bábís in [_Sh_]íráz were being

punished by Ḥusayn [_Kh_]án, Governor of the province of Fárs,[BK]

the Persian Government was trying to rescue Mullá `Alí in Ba[_gh_]dád.

Secondly, whereas the [_Sh_]í`ah divines were demanding a light

punishment, the Sunnís were clamouring for the death penalty. A third

point, important to students of the Bábí Faith, is that from the

earliest stage of its history rumours and misinformation about the Báb

abounded. It is also of considerable interest that this episode was

reported to Lord Aberdeen, the British Foreign Secretary in London.

[Footnote BK: Mullá `Alí was before long caught up in a

furore of agitation and oppression, was apprehended, put on

trial and condemned to death. It has always been assumed that

he was put to death somewhere in `Iráq (either in Mosul or

beyond), while being taken to Istanbul, because nothing more

was ever heard of him after he reached Mosul. But recent

research in official archives has established the fact that

he arrived in the Ottoman capital, was once again put on

trial and was condemned to hard labour in the dockyards,

where he died towards the end of 1846. (For most of this

information the author is much indebted to Mr Sami

Doktoroglu.)]

As to Mullá `Alí, what precisely happened to him, how and where he

died and where he was interred, have all remained mysteries. It has

been said that he died in the prison of Karkúk, but no definite proof

exists. He was the first of the concourse of martyrs whose numbers

were soon to swell into hundreds and thousands.

The Báb: The Herald of the Day of Days · 第 4 / 14 章