Indians, divided into four bands, might destroy the whole settlement in
one night.
"In the evening of the 17th, Dr. White arrived at my house, bringing
intelligence from the falls. He and Mr. Le Breton attempted to go to the
falls on horseback, but in trying to ford Haunchauke River, they found
the water so deep they were obliged to swim, and the doctor turned his
horse's head and came out the side he went in; but Le Breton, being the
better mounted of the two, succeeded in gaining the opposite shore; and
having the doctor's letters in his possession, continued on to the
falls. The doctor returned to the settlement. Le Breton returned the
following day, and brought information from the five men who had
attempted to take the Indian who had stolen Anderson's horse, that soon
after their retreat the Indians became alarmed and broke up in great
haste; but, before they left, they informed Anderson that the horse they
had stolen from him was worn out and good for nothing, and tying a good
horse to a tree near Anderson's house, they told him that he must take
that and be satisfied. They then hurried away, saying that they should
not be seen in that region again. It was ascertained that the Clackamas
Indians had nothing to do with the stolen horse; that it was a band of
the Molallas, the very same rascals that stole a horse from me two years
before, and after having him in their possession several weeks, brought
him down within a few miles of my house, where they encamped, and where
I went with one man and took him from the midst of more than fifty
grim-looking savages."
This shows at least that Mr. Hines had personal courage.
"On the 20th of April a letter was received in the settlement, written
by H. B. Brewer, at the Dalles, which brings the latest intelligence
from the infected region. This letter states that the Indians in the
interior talk much of war, and Mr. Brewer urges Dr. White to come up
without delay, and endeavor to allay the excitement. He does not inform
us that the Indians design any evil toward the whites, but says that the
war is to be between themselves, but that the Boston people have much to
fear. As the doctor, in his visit to the interior last October, left an
appointment to meet the Wallawalla Indians and the Cayuses, in their own
country, on the 10th of May, and believing that a great share of the
excitement originated in a misunderstanding of the Indians, he came to
the conclusion at all hazards to go among them. At the solicitation of
the agent, I determined to accompany him on the expedition.
"The great complaint of the Indians was that the Boston people designed
to take away their lands, and reduce them to slavery. This they had
inferred from what Dr. White had told them in his previous visit; and
this misunderstanding of the Indians had not only produced a great
excitement among them, but had occasioned considerable trouble betwixt
them and the missionaries and other whites in the upper country, as well
as influencing them to threaten the destruction of all the American
people. Individuals had come down from Fort Wallawalla to Vancouver,
bringing information of the excited state of things among the Indians,
and giving out that it would be extremely dangerous for Dr. White to go
up to meet his engagements. Their opinion was, that in all probability
he and the party which he might think proper to take with him would be
cut off. But it was the opinion of many judicious persons in the
settlement, that the welfare of the Indians, and the peace and security
of the whites, demanded that some persons qualified to negotiate with
the Indians should proceed immediately to the scene of disaffection, and
if possible remove the cause of the excitement by correcting the error
under which the Indians labored. Accordingly Dr. White engaged twelve
men besides myself, mostly French-Canadians who had had much experience
with Indians, to go with him; but a few days before the time fixed upon
to start had arrived, they all sent him word that they had decided not
to go. They were doubtless induced to pursue this course through the
influence of Dr. McLaughlin and the Catholic priests."
Most likely, Mr. Hines, but you seem to be afraid to express a decided
opinion, even after they have accomplished their object.
"When the day arrived for starting, we found ourselves abandoned by
every person who had engaged to go, except Mr. G. W. Le Breton, an
American, one Indian boy, and one Kanaka. With the two latter the doctor
and myself left the Wallamet settlement on the 25th of April, 1843, and
proceeded on horseback to the Butte, where we found Le Breton in waiting
for us. He had provided a canoe and a few pieces of pork and beef for
our use on the voyage.
"Here we met a letter from Dr. John McLaughlin, at Vancouver,
discouraging us from our undertaking in view of the difficulties and
dangers attending such an expedition; but we had counted the cost, and
were not to be diverted from our purpose, though danger stared us in the
face. We supposed that if the Indians entertained any hostile intentions
against the whites in general, there could be no better way to defeat
their purposes than to go among them; convince them that they had no
grounds of fear; and that the whites, instead of designing to bring them
into subjection, were desirous of doing them good. Prevented by one
thing and another from setting sail, on the night of the 27th we slept
on a bank of sand at the Butte, and next day proceeded in our little
canoe down to Wallamet Falls, where we continued until the 29th. Here we
received another package from Dr. McLaughlin, giving us information that
Rev. Mr. Demerse, a Catholic priest, had just come down from the upper
country, bringing intelligence that the Indians are only incensed
against the Boston people; that they have nothing against the French and
King George people; they are not mad at them, but are determined that
the Boston people shall not have their lands, and take away their
liberties.
"On receiving this intelligence from Mr. Demerse, Dr. McLaughlin advised
the Frenchmen, who had engaged to go with Dr. White, to have nothing to
do with the quarrel, to remain quiet at home, and let the Americans take
care of themselves. He also expressed, in his letter, the opinion that
all the people should remain quiet, and in all probability the
excitement among the Indians would soon subside.
"Not seeing sufficient reason to change our course, on the morning of
the 28th we left our hospitable friends at the falls and continued our
course down the Wallamet toward Vancouver. At noon we had sailed twenty
miles, and stopped for dinner within five miles of the mouth of the
Wallamet, on a low piece of ground, overgrown with luxuriant grass, but
which is always overflowed at the rise of the Columbia, or about the
first of June. Weighed anchor after dinner, and at four o'clock, P.M.,
arrived at Vancouver. Called on Dr. McLaughlin for goods, provisions,
powder, balls, etc., for our accommodation on our voyage up the
Columbia, and, though he was greatly surprised that, under the
circumstances, we should think of going among those excited Indians, yet
he ordered his clerks to let us have whatever we wanted. However, we
found it rather squally at the fort, not so much on account of our going
among the Indians of the interior, as in consequence of a certain
memorial having been sent to the United States Congress, implicating the
conduct of Dr. McLaughlin and the Hudson's Bay Company, and bearing the
signature of seventy Americans. I inquired of the doctor if he had
refused to grant supplies to those Americans who had signed that
document; he replied that he had not, but that the authors of the
memorial need expect no more favors from him. _Not being one of the
authors, but merely a signer of the petition, I did not come under the
ban of the company_; consequently I obtained my outfit for the
expedition, though at first there were strong indications that I would
be refused.
"We remained at the fort over night and a part of the next day, and
after a close conversation with the gentleman in command, were treated
with great courtesy."
CHAPTER XL.
A combination of facts.--Settlers alive to their danger.--Mr.
Hines' disparagement of the Methodist Mission.--Indians want pay
for being whipped.--Indian honesty.--Mr. Hines' opinion of the
Indians' religion.--Mr. Geiger's advice.--Dr. McLaughlin's answer
to Yellow Serpent.--Baptiste Doreo.--Four conflicting influences.
We now have before us a combination of facts and statements that no one
living at the time they occurred will attempt to deny. Shortess and
others still live to vouch for the truth of what is written. If Mr.
Hines has shown the least partiality in his writings, it is strongly in
favor of influences that were operating against him and the cause he
advocated; while such men as Rogers, Le Breton, Wilson, Whitman, and
others still living, spoke and acted the American sentiment of the
country. Mr. Hines and Dr. White had received two packages from Dr.
McLaughlin advising them not to go to the interior, and the Jesuit
priest, Demerse, had come down bringing word that the "quarrel" was not
with the _French_ and _English_, and that Dr. McLaughlin advised his
Frenchmen to remain at home and let the Americans take care of
themselves. Mr. Brewer is deceived as to the cause of the war rumors
about him, and seems solicitous only about the Indians. With all these
facts, as given by Mr. Hines, with his ability and experience, we are at
a loss to understand how it is that he could take notes and publish, in
1851, statements as above quoted, and then proceed with the account that
follows, rather excusing Dr. McLaughlin and the priests in the part they
are taking in attempting to crush the American settlement, and actually
aiding the Hudson's Bay Company in combining and marshaling the savages
to weaken and destroy his countrymen!
The writer does not believe he intended to do any thing of the kind, yet
the influences brought to bear upon him were such that he became an
active instrument with Dr. White to accomplish the one great object of
the Hudson's Bay Company and English government, and becomes the
apologist for a premeditated and deliberate murder of his countrymen.
The Whitman massacre he does not even mention.
The settlers were alive to their danger. They had no head, no
organization, no one to look to for supplies or protection. They knew
that the sub-agent of the United States government was the dupe of
their worst enemy, and had betrayed them. They knew that it was the
policy and disposition of the missions to keep them under their control.
We are fully aware of the fact that the leading clergymen of all the
missions attempt to deny the position above stated. But in the covenant
of Mr. Griffin with Mr. Munger, he admits that the articles of compact
and arrangement of the various missionary societies all affirm the one
principle, that laymen or members of their societies were subject to the
orders and dictation of the clergymen, not only in religious, but all
financial and secular matters,--hence the disposition and determination
on the part of these clerical gentlemen to govern the early settlement
of the country. The Hudson's Bay Company system of absolute government
was favorable to this idea. The Jesuit priests, who combined their
influence with the company, all contributed to oppress and keep down the
settler. While the priests were active in combining and preparing the
Indians in middle Oregon to rob and destroy the emigrant on his lonely,
weary, toilsome way to this country, their agents and principal clerks
were equally active in shaping matters in the various neighborhoods and
settlements west of the Cascades.
On the 156th page of Mr. Hines' book he gives us a short summary of the
labors of Revs. Daniel Lee, H. K. W. Perkins, and Mr. H. B. Brewer:
"They are laboring to establish a permanent mission at this place [the
Dalles] for the benefit of the Indians, but with doubtful success." That
the Methodist Mission should be misled and become inefficient is not to
be wondered at when such men as Mr. Hines, holding the position and
assuming a controlling influence as he did, should express himself in
the language quoted above. The "doubtful success" attending all the
missionary labors of the Methodist Mission was unquestionably
attributable to the opinions of just such men, privately and publicly
expressed, with corresponding "doubtful" and divided labors, while the
ignorance of the religious supporters of the Roman missions enabled them
to deceive their neophytes and patrons, and keep up their own missions
and destroy those of the Protestants.
Soon after Mr. Hines and party arrived at the Dalles, some twenty
Indians assembled to have a talk with Dr. White, who had in his visit in
the fall of 1842 prevailed upon this band to organize an Indian
government by appointing one high chief and three subordinates to see
that all violators of his rules were punished by being flogged for
offenses that formerly were considered trifling and evidence of native
cunning and smartness. As was to be expected, some of the Indians would
resist and use their knives and weapons in their own defense.
There is an interesting incident related by Mr. Hines, in reference to
Indian character, on his 157th page:--
"The Indians want pay for being whipped, in compliance with Dr.
White's laws, the same as they did for praying to please the
missionaries, during the great Indian revival of 1839. Those
appointed by Dr. White were desirous that his regulations should
continue, because they placed the people under their absolute
control, and gave them the power to regulate all their intercourse
with the whites, and with the other Indian tribes. But the other
influential men who were not in office desired to know of Dr. White
of what benefit this whipping system was going to be to them. They
said they were willing it should continue, provided they were to
receive shirts and pants and blankets as a reward for being whipped.
They had been whipped a good many times and had got nothing for it,
and it had done them no good. If this state of things was to
continue, it was all _cultus_, good for nothing, and they would
throw it away. The doctor wished them to understand that they need
not expect pay for being flogged when they deserved it. They laughed
at the idea, and separated."
Just here the writer will give one other incident, related of Yallop, an
Indian belonging to the same tribe, as stated by Rev. Mr. Condon, of the
Dalles:--
"Yallop was requested to remain at the house of Mr. Joslin during
the absence of the family, one cold day, and see that nothing was
disturbed, with the understanding that he was to go into the house
and make himself comfortable till the family returned. On coming
home they found the Indian outdoors under a tree, cold and nearly
frozen. They inquired the reason of his strange conduct, and wanted
to know why he did not stay in the house. Yallop said he went into
the house and found every thing so nice and comfortable that by and
by the old Indian came into him again and he wanted to steal all
there was in the house, and the only way he could get over that
feeling was to go out under the tree in the cold."
Mr. Hines, in speaking of this same band, says, 158th page: "As a matter
of course, lying has much to do in their system of trade, and he is the
best fellow who can tell the biggest lie, make men believe it, and
practice the greatest deception. A few years ago a great religious
excitement prevailed among these Indians, and nearly the whole tribe,
consisting of a thousand, professed to be converted, were baptized, and
received into the Christian church; but they have nearly all relapsed
into their former state, with the exception that many of them still keep
up the outward form of religion.
"Their religion appears to be more of the head than of the heart,
and though they are exceedingly vicious, yet doubtless they would be
much worse than they are, but for the"--("doubtful success," as Mr.
Hines affirms on his 156th page, while here he says)--"_restraining
influences_ exerted by the missionaries."
Mr. Hines has given us an interesting history of those early missionary
labors, but the greater portion of his book relates to himself,--to his
travels on shipboard, and at the Sandwich Islands, a trip to China and
back to New York, and his trip to the interior of Oregon.
He says: "The Cayuse Indians, among whom this mission is established,
had freely communicated to Mr. Geiger, whom they esteemed as their
friend, all they knew concerning it. When the Indians were told that the
Americans were designing to subjugate them and take away their land, the
young chiefs of the Cayuse tribe were in favor of proceeding immediately
to hostilities. They were for raising a large war party and rushing
directly down to the Wallamet settlement and cutting off the inhabitants
at a blow. They frequently remarked to Mr. Geiger that they did not wish
to go to war, but if the Americans came to take away their lands and
make slaves of them they would fight so long as they had a drop of blood
to shed. They said they had received their information concerning the
designs of the Americans from Baptiste Doreo, who is a half-breed son of
Madame Doreo,--the heroine of Washington Irving's 'Astoria,'--understands
the Nez Perce language well, and had given the Cayuses the information
that had alarmed them. Mr. Geiger endeavored to induce them to prepare
early in the spring to cultivate the ground as they did the year before,
but they refused to do any thing, saying that Baptiste Doreo had told
them that it would be of no consequence; that the Americans would come
in the summer and kill them all off and destroy their plantations.
"After Doreo had told them this story, they sent a Wallawalla
chief--Yellow Serpent--to Vancouver, to learn from Dr. McLaughlin the
facts in the case.
"Yellow Serpent returned and told the Cayuses that Dr. McLaughlin said
he had nothing to do in a war with the Indians; that he did not believe
the Americans designed to attack them, and that if the _Americans did go
to war with the Indians, the Hudson's Bay Company would not assist
them_. After they got this information from the Emakus Myohut (big
chief), the Indians became more calm. Many of them went to cultivating
the ground as formerly, and a large number of little patches had been
planted and sown before we arrived at the station."
Mr. Hines soon learned that the reports about war that had reached the
lower country were not without foundation. That the Indians still had
confidence in Mr. Geiger, and that they did not wish to go to war. The
reader will observe the statement of the Indians after they had told Mr.
Geiger they would fight if forced to do so. "They," the Indians, "said
they had received their information concerning the designs of the
Americans from Baptiste Doreo." This half-breed is also an interpreter
of the Hudson's Bay Company, and an important leader among the
half-breeds--next to Thomas McKay. After Doreo had told them his story,
the Indians were still unwilling to commence a war against the
Americans. They sent a messenger to Vancouver to consult Dr. McLaughlin,
just as those same Indians in 1841 went to Mr. McKinley, then in charge
of Fort Wallawalla, and wanted to know of him, if it was not good for
them to drive Dr. Whitman and Mr. Gray away from that station because
the Doctor refused to pay them for the land the mission occupied? Mr.
McKinley understood their object, and was satisfied that there were
outside influences that he did not approve of, and told the Indians,
"Yes, you are braves; there is a number of you, and but two of them and
two women and some little children; you can go and kill them or drive
them away; you go just as quick as you can and do it; but if you do I
will see that you are punished." The Indians understood Mr. McKinley.
Whitman and Gray were not disturbed after this.
Dr. John McLaughlin we believe to have been one of the noblest of men
while he lived, but, like Messrs. Hines, White, Burnett, Newell,
Spalding, and many others, influences were brought to bear upon him that
led him to adopt and pursue a doubtful if not a crooked course. It was
evident to any one conversant with the times of which we are writing
that there were at least four elements or influences operating in the
country, viz., the unasserted or _quasi_ rights of the American
government; the coveted and actual occupancy of the country by the
English Hudson's Bay Company and subjects, having the active civil
organization of that government; the occupancy of the country by the
American missions; and the coveted occupancy of the same by the Roman
Jesuit missions.
These four influences could not harmonize; there was no such thing as a
union and co-operation. The struggle was severe to hold and gain the
controlling influence over the natives of the country, and shape the
settlements to these conflicting views and national and sectarian
feelings. The American settler, gaining courage and following the
example and the track of the American missionaries with their wives,
winds his way over the mountains and through the desert and barren
plains down the Columbia River and through the Cascade Mountains,--
weary, way-worn, naked, and hungry. In one instance, with his rifle upon
his shoulder, and his wife and three children mounted upon the back of
his last ox, he plods his weary way through Oregon City, and up the
Wallamet, to find his future home; and there the warm heart of the early
missionary and his family is ready to feed, clothe, and welcome the
wanderer to this distant part of our great national domain, in order
that he may aid in securing Oregon to its rightful inhabitants, and in
forming a fifth power that shall supersede and drive away all foreign
influences.
For a time the struggle with the four influences was severe and
doubtful; but men who had crossed the Rocky and Cascade mountains with
ox-teams, were not made to give up their country's cause in the hour of
danger, though Britain and Rome, with their savage allies, joined to
subdue and drive them from it. With the British Hudson's Bay Company,
Roman Jesuit missions, savage Indians, American missions, and American
settlers the struggle is continued.
CHAPTER XLI.
Governor Simpson and Dr. Whitman in Washington.--Interviews with
Daniel Webster and President Tyler.--His cold reception in Boston
by the American Board.--Conducts a large emigration safely across
the Rocky Mountains into Oregon.--The "Memorial Half-Century
Volume."--The Oregon mission ignored by the American Board.--Dr.
McLaughlin.--His connection with the Hudson's Bay
Company.--Catholic Cayuses' manner of praying.--Rev. C.
Eells.--Letter from A. L. Lovejoy.--Description of Whitman's and
Lovejoy's winter journey from Oregon to Bent's Fort on the Arkansas
River.
Governor Simpson, of the Hudson's Bay Company, had reached Washington
and been introduced to Mr. Webster, then Secretary of State, by the
British Minister. All the influence a long-established and powerful
monopoly, backed by the grasping disposition of the English government,
can command, is brought to bear upon the question of the northwestern
boundary. The executive of the American republic is about ready to give
up the country, as of little value to the nation.
Just at this time, in the dead of winter, an awkward, tall,
spare-visaged, vigorous, off-hand sort of a man, appeared at the
Department in his mountain traveling garb, consisting of a dark-colored
blanket coat and buckskin pants, showing that to keep himself from
freezing to death he had been compelled to lie down close to his
camp-fire while in the mountains, and on his way to Washington he had
not stopped for a moment, but pushed on with a vigor and energy
peculiarly his own. It is but justice to say of this man that his heart
and soul were in the object of the errand for which he had traversed the
vast frozen and desert regions of the Rocky Mountains, to accomplish
which was to defeat the plans of the company, as shown by the taunting
reply of the Briton, "_that no power could make known to his government
the purposes of those who had laid their plans and were ready to grasp
the prize they sought_." While they were counting on wealth, power,
influence, and the undisputed possession of a vast and rich country,
this old pioneer missionary (layman though he was), having no thought of
himself or of his ridiculous appearance before the great Daniel Webster
and the President of a great nation, sought an interview with them and
stated his object, and the plans and purposes of the Hudson's Bay
Company and the British government: that their representations of this
country were false in every respect as regards its agricultural,
mineral, and commercial value to the nation; that it was only to secure
the country to themselves, that the false reports about it had been put
in circulation by their emissaries and agents; that a wagon road to the
Pacific was practicable; that he had, in 1836, in opposition to all
their false statements and influence to the contrary, taken a wagon to
Boise; and that, in addition, wagons and teams had, in 1841, been taken
to the Wallamet Valley, and that he expected, his life being spared, to
pilot an emigration to the country that would forever settle the
question beyond further dispute. He asserted that a road was
practicable, and the country was invaluable to the American people. Mr.
Webster coolly informed him that he had his mind made up; he was ready
to part with what was to him an unknown and unimportant portion of our
national domain, for the privilege of a small settlement in Maine and
the fisheries on the banks of Newfoundland.
There was but one other hope in this case. This old off-hand Oregon
missionary at once sought an interview with President Tyler. He repeated
his arguments and reasons, and asked for delay in the final settlement
of the boundary question, which, to those high in office, and, we may
add, total ignorance of all that related to this vast country, was of
small moment. But that Dr. Whitman (for the reader has already guessed
the name of our missionary) stood before the President of the United
States the only representative of Oregon and all her future interests
and greatness, a self-constituted, self-appointed, and without a
parallel self-periled representative, pleading simply for delay in the
settlement of so vast and important a question to his country,--that he
should be able to successfully contend with the combined influences
brought against him,--can only be attributed to that overruling power
which had decreed that the nation, whose interests he represented,
should be sustained.
Mr. Tyler, after listening to the Doctor's statements with far more
candor and interest than Mr. Webster was disposed to do, informed him
that, notwithstanding they had received entirely different statements
from gentlemen of the Hudson's Bay Company and the British minister,
then in Washington, yet he would trust to his personal representation
and estimate of the value of the country to the American people. He
said: "Dr. Whitman, in accordance with your representations and
agreeable to your request, this question shall be deferred. An escort
shall be furnished for the protection of the emigration you propose to
conduct to that distant country."
It is with deep regret, not to say shame, that truth and justice compel
us to give in this connection any notice of this faithful and devoted
missionary's reception and treatment, on his arrival in Boston,
derogatory to the Board whom he had served so faithfully for seven
years. Instead of being received and treated as his labors justly
entitled him to be, he met the cold, calculating rebuke for unreasonable
expense, and for dangers incurred without order or instructions or
permission from the mission to come to the States. Most of his reverend
associates had, as the writer is credibly informed, disapproved of his
visit to Washington, being ignorant of the true cause of his sudden
determination to defeat, if possible, the British and Jesuitical designs
upon the country; hence, for economical and prudential reasons, the
Board received him coldly, and rebuked him for his presence before them,
causing a chill in his warm and generous heart, and a sense of unmerited
rebuke from those who should have been most willing to listen to all his
statements, and most cordial and ready to sustain him in his herculean
labors.
His request at Washington to save this richest jewel of our nation from
British rule is granted, while the American Board of Commissioners for
Foreign Missions is appealed to in vain for aid to save the Indians and
the country from becoming the boast of the Italian Jesuit, and a prey to
his degrading superstitions. The Doctor's mission, with all its
accumulated influence, labors, and importance, is left to be swallowed
up and destroyed by the same influence that had divided and destroyed
that of the Methodist Mission.
Dr. Whitman disposed of his own little private property in the States,
and, with the aid of his brother and brother's son, returned to
Missouri, joined the emigration of 1843, and, as he had intimated to
President Tyler, brought on an emigration outnumbering all the Hudson's
Bay Company had brought to aid in securing the country to the British
crown, proving to the American people and the world, what had long been
asserted as impossible, that there was a practicable wagon road to the
Pacific Ocean on American soil. His care, influence, aid, and attention
to the emigration of 1843, I leave with those who can speak from
personal observation. Their gratitude and deep sympathy for this
self-devoted, faithful, and generous missionary led five hundred of them
with uplifted hand to say they were ready with their own life-blood to
avenge his death, and protect and defend the country. But influences,
such as we have been speaking of, came in, justice was robbed of its
right, and crime and murder permitted to go unpunished.
The cause in which Dr. Whitman enlisted, labored, and fell a victim, is
allowed to suffer and fall, and in a Memorial Volume of the American
Board, page 379, a false impression is given to the world, and a whole
mission ignored. In this splendid, well-bound, and elegantly gotten up
"Memorial Half-Century Volume," justly claiming much credit for the
fifty past years of its labors, this Board has ignored all its errors
and mistakes, and with one fell swoop of the pen consigned to oblivion,
so far as its great standard record is concerned, one whole mission and
a vast Indian population, as unworthy of a name or a notice in their
record, further than as "Rev. Samuel Parker's exploring tour beyond the
Rocky Mountains, under the direction of the Board, in 1835, 1836, and
1837, brought to light _no field for a great and successful mission_,
but it added much to the science of geography, and is remarkable as
having made known a practicable route for a _railroad_ from the
Mississippi to the Pacific." This shows a want of candor and also a
disposition to ignore all influences and causes of failure of one of
their own missions, and directs the attention of the reader to foreign
objects, leaving their missions to become an easy prey to avarice, the
Indian tribes to ignorance and superstition, and their missionaries to
be despised and superseded by Jesuits; giving their enemies the benefit
of that influence which they should have exerted to save their own
missionary cause. Such being the case, we are not to wonder at the cold
reception of Dr. Whitman, or the boundless influence and avarice of the
men who compassed the early destruction of that mission; and, failing to
destroy the American settlement, that they should now seek to rob our
national treasury as they sought to rob the nation of its rightful
domain. After being defeated by the American settlers in the
organization of the provisional government in 1843, by the provisional
army of 1847-8, they now come forward with the most barefaced effrontery
and claim millions of dollars for a few old rotten forts. They have
fallen to the lowest depths of crime to obtain compensation for
improvements of no real value.
As we said when speaking of the "combination of influences and no
harmony," we believe Dr. John McLaughlin to have been one of the best
and noblest of men; yet the governing power of the Hudson's Bay Company
would, if it were possible, have compelled him to starve the immigrants,
and sacrifice all the early settlers of the country. Do you ask me how I
know this? I answer, by the oaths of good and true American citizens,
and by my own personal knowledge. These depositions or statements under
oath but few of the readers of this history will ever see. In this
connection we will give part of one deposition we listened to and
penciled down from the mouth of the witness, who was the legal counselor
and confidential friend of Dr. McLaughlin from the fall of 1846 till his
death. This witness, in answer to the inquiry as to what Dr. McLaughlin
told him about the Hudson's Bay Company's encouraging the early
settlement of Oregon, said Dr. McLaughlin _had not encouraged the
American settlement of the country_, but from the fact that immigrants
arrived poor and needy, they must have suffered had he not furnished
supplies on a credit; that he could have wished that this had not been
necessary, because he believed there were those above him who _strongly
disapproved of his course in this respect, affirming that it would lead
to the permanent settlement of the country by American citizens_, and
thus give to the United States government an element of title to the
country; the United States government could not have a title to the
country without such settlement, and these persons, thus alluded to as
being dissatisfied, would report him to the Hudson's Bay Company's house
in London; that he ascertained finally that such complaints had been
made, but that he still continued to furnish the supplies, because, _as
a man of common humanity_, he could not do otherwise; and he resolved
that he would continue thus to do and take whatever consequences might
result from it; that the company's managing and controlling office in
London did finally call him to an account for thus furnishing supplies
as already stated, and for reasons indicated; that he represented to
them the circumstances under which he had furnished these supplies,
alleging that as a man of _common humanity it was not possible for him
to do otherwise than as he did_; that he foresaw as clearly as they did
that it aided in the American settlement of the country, but that this
he could not help, and it was not for him but for God and government to
look after and take care of the consequences; that the Bible told him,
"If thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he is naked, clothe him;" that
these settlers were not even enemies; that in thus finding fault with
him they quarreled with heaven (the witness said, "I do not know as that
was the exact expression or word") _for doing what any one truly worthy
the name of a man could not hesitate to do_, and that he immediately
concluded by indignantly saying, "_Gentlemen, if such is your order, I
will serve you no longer_," and from that day Oregon secured a warm and
faithful friend in that old white-headed man, and he a base and infamous
enemy in those who claimed the title of the Honorable Hudson's Bay
Company, who in 1860 are claiming all the credit and pay for this old
man's generous and noble deeds.
The readers of our history will excuse this interruption in the order of
events, or rather the introduction of this testimony at this time in our
sketches, for we shall still have to speak of Dr. McLaughlin as the head
of the Hudson's Bay Company, and continue him as a representative of
that influence, as also connected with the Roman Catholic efforts in the
country; for while we condemn and speak of base and infamous acts in
all alike, we will not forget the good and the noble. We have other
items of testimony that reveal to us the deep-laid plans, the vast
influence used, and efforts made, _to prevent the American settlement of
this country_, which shall be brought to light as we proceed.
One other item we will now give as developed by the testimony above
referred to. Dr. McLaughlin informed his attorney "that he had proposed
to the company's authority in London, that if they would allow him to
retain the profits upon the supplies and advances made as above
mentioned to the settlers, he would very cheerfully personally assume
the payment to the company of all the sums thus advanced, but this the
company declined to do." The witness said: "My memory is not very
distinct, at least, not so much as it is as to the statement above made,
but my recollection is that he also informed me that the company,
although it refused to permit him to retain the profits above mentioned,
did hold him responsible for every dollar of the advances he made, and I
do know that he regarded and treated the debts thus owing by American
citizens as debts owing not to the Hudson's Bay Company, but to himself
individually."
Dr. McLaughlin charges ingratitude upon those who were able to, and did
not pay him, and were guilty of denouncing him as an aristocrat. He was
no aristocrat, but one of the kindest, most obliging, and familiar men;
yet his tall, erect, and noble frame, a head covered with white hair, a
long white beard, light complexion, rather spare but open countenance,
with a full light blue or gray eye, made the coward and the mean man
hate him, while the truly noble man would love him for his generous and
unbounded benevolence. Like Dr. Whitman, the influences around him
weighed heavily upon his soul; he keenly felt the pain of ingratitude in
others; he felt it from the Hudson's Bay Company, whom he had faithfully
served, and from the persons he had befriended. An attempt was made by a
member of the company, who had previously sworn to the justness of their
infamous claims, to excite the sectarian prejudice of the witness
against Dr. McLaughlin on his cross-examination, by handing to the
company's attorney the following questions to be asked the witness:--
_Ques._--"Do you not recollect that Dr. McLaughlin told you that
Sir George Simpson's complaint against him was his allowing a
credit of ten thousand pounds sterling to Bishop Blanchet, of the
Catholic mission, without any security?"
_Ans._--"This is the first time I have heard of that transaction."
_Ques._--"Do you not know from what Dr. McLaughlin told you, that
he gave large credits to the Catholic Mission while in charge of
the company's business?"
_Ans._--"I do not."
In reference to the last two questions and answers, in looking over the
items of account against our government, something over this amount is
stated as an item of claim for improvements and a Catholic church
building and two schoolhouses at Vancouver, as having been made by the
Hudson's Bay Company for the Catholic missions and the benefit of the
company's business, which are still standing and in possession of the
priests and nuns of that order. This matter should be closely
investigated. We have abundance of other evidence to show the intimate
and continued connection of the Jesuit missions with the company, and we
look upon this attempt to change the responsibility of that connection
from the company to Dr. McLaughlin's individual account, as among the
basest of their transactions. The Jesuitical Catholic concern was a
child of their own, and one they are still nursing in all their vast
dominions. They made use of Dr. McLaughlin as long as they could, and
when they found he was inclined to favor the American settlement of the
country, he fell under the displeasure of his superiors and was called
to an account.
These facts explain the careful and repeated injunctions, and positive
directions given to the early missionaries not to interfere with the
Hudson's Bay Company's trade, _and by no means to encourage the
settlement of white men about their stations, compelling those white men
to become subject to, and connected with, the missions_. They also
explain the reasons for the extreme caution exercised by the company
over the supplies granted to the American missions. They invariably
limited them to the smallest possible necessity, and by this means
sought to prevent the settlement of the country. It also explains fully
the complaint of Rev. Mr. Griffin in his effort for an independent
mission, and shows conclusively the continued effort of the company to
check as much as possible the progress of the settlement, as also the
desperate effort they made in 1847 to destroy the missions and all
American settlements; and more than this, it explains the continued wars
with all the Indians who have ever been under the influence of the
company, or their _pet child, the Jesuit missions_.
The Hudson's Bay Company had no fault to find with Dr. McLaughlin,
except in his refusing to carry out their base designs upon the American
settlers and for the assistance he rendered upon his own responsibility
to the naked and starving immigrants that Grant, at Fort Hall, with the
Indians along the route, had combined to deceive and rob, while on the
way to the country. This old, white-headed man, who had served them for
forty years, _was compelled_, in maintaining his honor as a man
possessing one noble feeling of humanity, to leave their service.
What think you, kind reader, of the Hudson's Bay Company's kindness and
generosity to the American settler, when this same company held this old
faithful servant of theirs individually responsible for every dollar,
principal and profits, of the supplies his generous heart, claiming to
be humane, was induced to advance to the early settler in the hour of
his greatest need?
Will you vote and pay a tax to pay claims of such a company, when one of
the managing partners is still base enough to say, "It was a neglect of
the company's agent, after Dr. McLaughlin's decease, that they did not
present their accounts for payment to the doctor's heirs or
administrator before the year's notice was up. It was now too late, and
it was lost to the company unless they could get it allowed by the
United States government?"
We justly deprecate piracy, slavery, highway robbery, and Indian
massacres. In what light shall we hold a company and government, who
have pursued a course directly and indirectly calculated to produce all
these, and with the uplifted hand say they are entitled to pay for such
conduct?
But we must still refer to Dr. McLaughlin as representing the Hudson's
Bay Company, as we proceed with our history of events, agencies, men,
and things occurring in 1843.
Dr. Whitman is on his way back to Oregon with eight hundred and
seventy-five persons, with all their equipments and cattle. Simpson is
foiled and disappointed at Washington. Hines and Dr. White are among the
Upper Columbia Indians. Dr. McLaughlin and the French-Canadians and
priests are in commotion about the effort to organize the settlement
into a provisional government, and the influence the Americans appear to
be gaining over the Indians. Piopiomoxmox (Yellow Serpent) has returned
and reported to the Cayuses the result of his visit to Dr. McLaughlin,
and the determination of the company that, in case of a war with the
Americans, "_they would not aid the Americans_, but let them take care
of themselves." The old Indian chiefs had advised the young men to wait
and see what the future designs of the Americans were; while the Jesuits
had been careful to impress upon the savage mind their peculiar
sectarian notions and prejudices, as illustrated by the religious
instructions given by the priests to the Cayuses.
The Rev. H. K. W. Perkins called at Young Chief's (Tawatowe) lodge, and
was informed on entering, that they had not yet had their morning
prayer. The chief caused a bell to be rung, at the sound of which all
his band came together for devotion. Tawatowe then said to Mr. Perkins:
"We are Catholics, and our worship is different from yours." He then
fell upon his knees, all the rest kneeling and facing him. The chief had
a long string of beads on his neck to which was attached a brass cross.
After all were knelt, they devoutly crossed themselves, and commenced
their prayer as follows: "We are poor, we are poor," repeating it ten
times, and then closing with "Good Father, good Son, good Spirit," and
then the chief would slip a bead on the string. This was continued until
all the beads were removed from one part of the string to the other.
When this mock devotion closed, Tawatowe said: "This is the way in which
the priest taught us to worship God;" but Elijah (a boy that had been
educated at the Methodist Indian school) said that "Tawatowe and his
band prayed from the head, but we [meaning his own Wallawalla tribe]
pray from the heart."
Since writing the above, we have found in the _Missionary Herald_ of
December, 1866, page 371, a letter from Rev. C. Eells, formerly of the
Spokan Mission. In speaking of Dr. Whitman's visit to the States, he
says: "Mr. Walker and myself were decidedly opposed, and we yielded only
when it became evident that he would go, even if he became disconnected
with the mission in order to do so. According to the understanding of
the members of the mission, the single object of Dr. Whitman in
attempting to cross the continent in the winter of 1842-43, amid mighty
perils and sufferings, was to make a desperate effort to save this
country to the United States."
We are not much surprised at Mr. Eells' ignorance of influences
operating in this country. His fears and caution have made him
unreasonably timid. He is always so fearful that he will do or say
something wrong, that the saving of this country to our government, and
an attempt on the part of his associates to counteract Roman Catholic
superstitions and maintain the influence of the Protestant religion on
our western coast, are opposed by him and his equally timid associate.
He has not the frankness or courage to state the whole truth in the
case, as developed in Mr. Treat's remarks, who, after giving Mr. Eells'
letter, says: "_It was not simply an American question, however_;" it
was at the same time a Protestant question. He [Dr. Whitman] was fully
alive to the efforts which the Roman Catholics were making to gain the
mastery on the Pacific coast, and he was firmly persuaded that they were
working in the interests of the Hudson's Bay Company, with a view to
this very end. The danger from this quarter [which Messrs. Eells and
Walker could never see, or, if they did, were too timid to speak or act]
had made a profound impression upon his mind. Under date of April 1,
1847, he said: "In the autumn of 1842, I pointed out to our mission the
arrangements of the Papists to settle in our vicinity, and that it only
required that those arrangements should be completed to close our
operations."
It is in reference to the facts above quoted from Dr. Whitman's
letter--made in our presence to those timid associates--that we say they
were cowards in not speaking and acting as they should have done at that
time, and since his death.
The following letter from General A. L. Lovejoy gives further proof of
Dr. Whitman's efforts to save Oregon to his country:--
PORTLAND, OREGON, November 6, 1869.
_William H. Gray, Esq.:_
MY DEAR SIR,--Your note of the 27th ult., making inquiries touching
the journey of the late Dr. Marcus Whitman to the United States
from this coast in the winter of 1842 and '43, and his reception at
Washington, and by the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign
Missions, etc., has but just come to hand, owing to my being absent
from home.
True, I was the traveling companion of the Doctor in that arduous
and trying journey, but at this late hour it will be almost
impossible for me to give many of the thrilling scenes and
hairbreadth escapes that we went through, traveling as we did,
almost the entire route, through a hostile Indian country, as well
as suffering much from the intense cold and snows that we had to
encounter in passing over the Rocky Mountains in midwinter.
Previous to our leaving Wailatpu, I often had conversations with
the Doctor touching the prospects of this coast. The Doctor was
alive to its interests, and manifested a very warm desire to have
this country properly represented at Washington, and, after some
arrangements, we left Wailatpu, October 3, 1842, overland, for the
Eastern States.
We traveled rapidly, and reached Fort Hall in eleven days, and
remained only a day or two and made some few purchases; took a
guide and left for Fort Wintee, as the Doctor changed from a direct
route to one more southern through the Spanish country, _via_ Taos
and Santa Fe. On our way from Fort Hall to Fort Wintee we met with
terribly severe weather; the snows greatly retarded our progress,
and blinded the trail, so much so that we lost much time. After
reaching Fort Wintee and making some suitable purchases for our
trip, we took a new guide and started on our journey for Fort
Macumpagra, situate on the waters of Grand River, in the Spanish
country.
Here again our stay was very short. We simply made some few
purchases, took a new guide, and left for Taos. After being out
some four or five days, as we were passing over high table-lands,
we encountered a most terrific snow-storm, which forced us to seek
shelter at once. A deep ravine being near by, we rapidly made for
it, but the snow fell so rapidly, and the wind blew with such
violence, that it was almost impossible to reach it. After reaching
the ravine, and cutting some cotton-wood trees for our animals, we
attempted some arrangements for camp as best we could under the
circumstances, and remained snowed in for some three or four days,
when the storm subsided, and it cleared off intensely cold. It was
with much difficulty that we made our way up upon the high lands;
the snow was so deep and the wind so piercing and cold, that we
felt compelled to return to camp and wait a few days for a change
of weather.
Our next effort was more successful, and after spending several
days wandering round in the snow, without making much headway, and
greatly fatiguing our animals, to little or no purpose, our guide
informed us that the deep snows had so changed the face of the
country, that he was completely lost, and could take us no further.
This was a terrible blow to the Doctor. He was determined not to
give it up without another effort. And we at once agreed that the
Doctor should take the guide and make his way back to the fort, and
procure a new guide, and that I should remain in camp with the
animals until his return, which was on the seventh day, with a new
guide.
We were soon under way, on our route, traveling through the snows
at rather a snail's pace. Nothing occurred of much importance,
other than hard and slow traveling until we reached, as our guide
informed us, the Grand River, which was frozen, on either side,
about one-third across. The current was so very rapid, that the
center of the stream remained open, although the weather was
intensely cold.
This stream was some one hundred and fifty, or two hundred yards
wide, and looked upon by our guide as very dangerous to cross in
its present condition. But the Doctor, nothing daunted, was the
first to take the water. He mounted his horse, and the guide and
myself pushed them off the ice into the boiling, foaming stream.
Away they went completely under water--horse and all; but directly
came up, and after buffeting the waves and foaming current, he made
to the ice on the opposite side, a long way down the stream--leaped
from his horse upon the ice, and soon had his noble animal by his
side. The guide and myself forced in the pack animals; followed the
doctor's example, and were soon drying our frozen clothes by a
comfortable fire.
With our new guide, traveling slowly on, we reached Taos in about
thirty days. We suffered considerably from cold and scarcity of
provisions, and for food were compelled to use the flesh of mules,
dogs, and such other animals as came in our reach.
We remained at Taos some twelve or fifteen days, when we changed
off our animals, and made such purchases as our journey required,
and left for Bent's Fort, on the headwaters of the Arkansas River,
where we arrived about the third day of January, 1843.
The Doctor left here on the 7th, at which time we parted, and I did
not meet him again until some time in the month of July, above Fort
Laramie, on his way to Oregon with a train of emigrants.
The Doctor often expressed himself to me about the remainder of his
journey, and the manner in which he was received at Washington and
by the Board of Missions at Boston.
The Doctor had several interviews with President Tyler, Secretary
Webster, and many members of Congress, touching the interests of
Oregon. He urged the immediate termination of the treaty with Great
Britain relative to this country, and the extension of the laws of
the United States, and to provide liberal inducements to emigrants
to come to this coast.
He felt much chagrined at the lack of interest, and the great want
of knowledge concerning Oregon, and the wants of this country,
though he was very cordially and kindly received, and many seemed
anxious to obtain every information which he could give them; and I
have no doubt, the Doctor's interviews resulted greatly to the
benefit of Oregon and the entire coast.
But his reception at Boston was not so cordial. The Board censured
him for leaving his post, for the waste of time and the great
expense attending so long a journey across the continent at that
season of the year.
The Doctor returned to the frontier settlements, urging the
citizens to emigrate to the Pacific coast. After his exertions in
this behalf, he left for Independence, Missouri, and started for
Oregon with a large emigrant train some time in the month of May.
With his energy and knowledge of the country, he rendered them very
great assistance, and continued to do so, till he reached his home
about the first of October (one year from the time he left), to
find the home of his choice sadly neglected, and the flouring mill
burned to the ground.
The Indians were very hostile about the Doctor's leaving at the
time he did, and I have no doubt, that during his absence, the
thistles of his destruction--the seeds of that awful massacre of
himself, Mrs. Whitman, and many others--were then sown by those
haughty and savage Cayuses, although it did not take place till
four years afterward.
As to your fourth inquiry relative to the Cayuse war. It is a long
time since these events took place; and most of them are on record,
and have passed into the history of the country; so that I would
not like to make many statements from memory, although I was an
adjutant-general, and was also one of the commissioners to raise
means to equip the first company, which was dispatched to the
Dalles the day after the sad news of the massacre reached Oregon
City.
There being no supplies at Oregon City suitable to fit out this
company, the commissioners proceeded at once to Fort Vancouver to
procure supplies for an outfit. The Hudson's Bay Company refused to
let us have any thing on account of the government; but would on
our joint and several note, to the amount of $1,000, which was
cheerfully given, and the outfit was obtained, and the company was
pushed on to its destination, and reached the Dalles in time to
prevent further bloodshed at that place by the red devils.
Yours, with great respect,
A. L. LOVEJOY.
W. H. GRAY, Esq., Astoria, Oregon.
CHAPTER XLII.
Assembly of the Nez Perces, Cayuses, and Wallawallas.--Mock
fight.--Council with the Indians.--Speeches by Yellow Serpent,
Tilokaikt, the Prince, and Illutin.--The secret of the whole
difficulty.--John, the Kanaka.--A cow for a horse.--Killing of a
medicine woman.
We will return to Rev. Mr. Hines' narrative of his trip among the
Cayuses, May 22, 1843.
"As the Indians refused to come together unless Ellis and his men
came down to meet us, we informed them that we would go up and see
Ellis in his own country; but being suspicious that we intended to
prevent his coming down, they were much opposed to our going.
Explaining to the chiefs the object of our visit, they seemed to be
satisfied."
We have, in this short statement of Mr. Hines, an important fact. The
Cayuse Indians had been instructed what to do; they were not to be
diverted by any arrangements of the sub-agent. Notwithstanding, the
agent and Mr. Hines had learned that Ellis was coming with several
hundred warriors, they knew not for what purpose, some saying to make
war upon the Cayuses, and they had determined to prevent the meeting of
the two tribes if possible. During their absence the Cayuses all
collected not far from Dr. Whitman's, and were waiting the arrival of
the Nez Perces. On the 22d of May the Nez Perces, some six hundred
strong, with a thousand horses, arrived on the plain. Some three hundred
of the Cayuses and Wallawallas uniting formed a grand Indian cavalcade
on the plain in front of Dr. Whitman's house, when a grand display of
Indian horsemanship commenced, such as advancing in mock fantastic
fight, with discharges of blank cartridges, wheeling and running in all
directions, till the Indians had nearly worked themselves into a real
fight and a great excitement. Ellis said that he thought the Cayuses
were determined to have a fight in earnest.
Tawatowe, the _Catholic_ chief, as he approached them appeared quite
angry and disposed to quarrel. Seeing the excitement increasing, and
fearing that it might end seriously unless the attention of the Indians
could be drawn to some other subject, Mr. Spalding, who was present,
gave notice that all would repair to Dr. Whitman's house for
_tallapooso_ (worship). But Tawatowe came forward in a very boisterous
manner and inquired what we had made all this disturbance for. The
American party, followed by several hundred Indians, repaired to the
station and engaged in religious exercises, when the excitement subsided
for the night.
On May 23, the chiefs and principal men of the three tribes assembled at
the station to hear what the self-constituted United States Indian
commissioner and his secretary of state had to say.
"They were called to order by Tawatowe, who by this time had got over
his excitement, and then was placed before them the object of our visit.
They were told that much had been said about war, and we had come to
assure them that they had nothing to fear from that quarter." If Dr.
White was no more explicit in setting forth the object of this visit to
the Indians than Mr. Hines is in giving the account of it, there
certainly was room for a misunderstanding between him and the Indians.
He said "the President of the United States had not sent him [Dr. White]
to make war upon them, but to enter into arrangements with them to
regulate their intercourse with the white people. We were not there to
catch them in a trap, as a man would a beaver, but to do them good; and
if they would lay aside their former practices and prejudices, stop
their quarrels, cultivate their lands, and receive good laws, they might
become a great and happy people; that in order to do this _they must all
be united_." Exactly what the Hudson's Bay Company wished to have done
to aid them in crushing the American settlement and preventing further
American emigration to the country.
As a reason for their being united, Mr. Hines says, 178-9th pages:
"They were told they were few in comparison to the whites, and if
they were not all of one heart they would be able to accomplish
nothing. The chiefs should set the example and love each other, and
not get proud and haughty, but consider the people as their brothers
and their children, and labor to do them good, that the people
should be obedient, and in their morning and evening prayers they
should remember their chiefs.
"Ellis remarked that it would not be proper for the Nez Perce chiefs
to speak until the Cayuse people should receive the laws. The Cayuse
chiefs replied: 'If you want us to receive the laws, bring them
forward and let us see them, as we can not take them unless we know
what they are.'
"A speech was then delivered to the young men to impress them
favorably with regard to the laws. They were told that they would
soon take the places of the old men, and they should be willing to
act for the good of the people; that they should not go here and
there and spread false reports about war; and that this had been
the cause of all the difficulty and excitement that had prevailed
among them during the past winter."
With the information which Mr. Hines has already given us in the first
part of his ninth chapter, we would suppose he would avoid this
apparently incorrect statement to the Indians of the cause of the
difficulties then existing. He and Dr. White appear to have acted under
the same influence with Dr. McLaughlin, and to have carried all their
acts and counsels to the one object, which was to combine the Indians,
and divide and destroy the settlement. He tells us, in continuation of
the proceedings of this council, that "the laws were then read, first in
English, and then in Nez Perce."
"Yellow Serpent then rose and said: 'I have a message to you. Where
are these laws from? I would that you might say they were from God.
But I think they are from the earth, because, from what I know of
white men [a term claimed by Brouillet as belonging to the Hudson's
Bay Company and Frenchmen], they do not honor these laws.' In answer
to this, the people were informed that the laws were recognized by
God, and imposed on men in all civilized countries. Yellow Serpent
was pleased with the explanation, and said that it was according to
the instructions he had received from others, and he was glad to
learn that it was so, because many of his people had been angry with
him when he had whipped them for crime, and had told him that God
would send him to hell for it, and he was glad to know that it was
pleasing to God.
"Tilokaikt, a Cayuse chief, rose and said: 'What do you read the
laws for before we take them? We do not take the laws because
Tawatowe says so. He is a _Catholic_, and as a people we do not
follow his worship.' Dr. White replied that this did not make any
difference about the law; that the people in the States had
different modes of worship, yet all had one law.
"A chief, called the Prince, arose and said: 'I understand you gave
us liberty to examine every law,--all the words and lines,--and as
questions are asked about it, we should get a better understanding
of it. The people of this country have but one mind about it. I have
something to say, but perhaps the people will dispute me. As a body,
we have not had an opportunity to consult, therefore you come to us
as in a wind, and speak to us as to the air, as we have no point,
and we can not speak because we have no point before us. The
business before us is whole like a body; we have not dissected it.
And perhaps you will say it is out of place for me to speak, because
I am not a great chief. Once I had influence, but now I have but
little.'"
This was one of the principal chiefs of the tribe that assisted in
taking Fort Wallawalla and tying Mr. Pambrun to compel him to give more
goods for horses and furs. "He was about to sit down, but was told to go
on. He then said: 'When the whites first came among us, we had no
cattle; they have given us none; what we have now got we have obtained
by an exchange of property. A long time ago Lewis and Clarke came to
this country, and I want to know what they said about us. Did they say
they found friends or enemies here?' Being told that they spoke well of
the Indians, the Prince said: 'That is a reason why the whites should
unite with us, and all become one people. Those who have been here
before you have left us no memorial of their kindness, by giving us
presents. We speak by way of favor; if you have any benefit to bestow,
we will then speak more freely. One thing that we can speak about is
cattle, and the reason why we can not speak out now is because we have
not the thing before us. My people are poor and blind, and we must have
something tangible. Other chiefs have bewildered me since they came; yet
I am from an honorable stock. Promises which have been made to me and my
fathers have not been fulfilled, and I am made miserable; but it will
not answer for me to speak out, for my people do not consider me as
their chief.' [This was just what Mr. Pambrun, of the Hudson's Bay
Company, had done to this Indian chief to break his power and destroy
his influence with his tribe and his people. But let us hear him
through.] 'One thing more; you have reminded me of what was promised me
some time ago, and I am inclined to follow on and see, though I have
been giving my beaver to the whites and have received many promises, and
have always been disappointed; I want to know what you are going to do?'
"Illutin, or Big Belly, then arose and said that the old men were
wearied with the wickedness of the young men; that if he was alone he
could say 'Yes' at once to the laws, and that the reason why the young
men did not feel as he felt, was because they had stolen property in
their hands, and the laws condemned stealing. But he assured them that
the laws were calculated to do them good and not evil.
"But this did not satisfy the Prince. He desired that the good which it
was proposed to do them by adopting the laws might be put in a tangible
form before them.
"He said that it had been a long time since the country had been
discovered by whites, and that ever since that time people had been
coming along promising to do them good; but they had all passed by and
left no blessing behind them."
This chief said that "the Hudson's Bay Company had persuaded them to
continue with them, and not go after the Americans; that if the
Americans designed to do them good, why did they not bring goods with
them to leave with the Indians? that they were fools to listen to what
_Suapies_ (Americans) had to say; that they would only talk, but the
company would _both talk and give them presents_."
This Indian, as his speech shows, was shrewd, and thought he was certain
to obtain his object, either from the Hudson's Bay Company or the
Americans. He had been humbled by the company, and an offer to buy him
back had been made. He bid for a higher price with the Americans. In
doing so, he naturally exposed the secret influence of the company,
which is given in this book of Mr. Hines', as a matter of course, and he
passes along without note or comment upon what he saw, and heard.
"In reply to the last Indian speech, Dr. White told the Indians that he
did not come to them as a missionary or as a trader."
To Ellis and Lawyer, who called on them in the evening to have a talk,
"they said they expected pay for being chiefs, and wanted to know how
much salary Dr. White was going to give them. Ellis said he had counted
the months he had been in office, and thought that enough was due him to
make him rich. They left at a late hour without receiving any
satisfaction. In the council, efforts were made to induce the Nez Perces
to unite under one chief in the fall of 1842. Thomas McKay had promised
these chiefs large salaries and many presents that Dr. White and his
government would give them as an inducement to form a union, knowing
that White had not the ability or means to make good his promises to
them, and in this way any influence as an agent of the American
government he might have would be lost in this tribe.
"Ellis was a Hudson's Bay Indian, educated at the Red River settlement.
They left this private interview with White without any satisfaction,
showing that the policy of the company was producing its legitimate
effect upon Ellis's mind. The Lawyer, however, understood the matter in
its true light. He explained to us the whole transaction, and the
promises of McKay from the company. He thought Dr. White was foolish to
let McKay talk so much for him and the American government.
"Some hundreds again assembled the next day (May 24) to renew the
business relative to laws; but the first thing investigated was the
shooting of John, the Kanaka, by the Indian. John had gone to a lodge
the day before, and in a dispute in a trade he had dared the Indian to
shoot him. The Indian had seized his gun and fired it at John's head,
making considerable of a hole in the scalp, but none in the skull. The
Indian fled, but was brought back and found guilty and kept till the
laws were adopted for sentence and punishment, and finally punished with
forty lashes on the bare back.
"The Indians continued to speak in reference to the laws. Their speeches
were grave, energetic, mighty, and eloquent, and generally in favor of
receiving the laws. After all had spoken it was signified that they were
ready to vote whether they would take the laws or not, and the vote was
unanimous in the affirmative. Having adopted the laws, it was now
necessary to elect their chief, according to the provisions of the laws,
and Tawatowe was nominated to the highest chieftainship. Some were
opposed; a majority were in favor, and while the question was pending
[this Indian had not consulted his priest, or he would have declined at
once on this first proposition to elect him chief], Tawatowe arose and
said, 'My friends, I rise to speak to you, and I want you all to
listen.' He then adverted to his past history, and told them how much he
had suffered in consequence of their divisions and quarrels. Tawatowe
joined his influence with the Prince to get more pay from the Hudson's
Bay Company for horses and furs, hence his tribe were encouraged to
quarrel with and disrespect him. When we first arrived in the country he
was seldom invited to the fort, and received no presents from the
company. He inquired of his people if they would lay aside all their
past difficulties and come up and support him if he would accept of the
chieftainship.
"It was now time to close for the day, and the vote being put, Tawatowe
was declared duly elected to the high chieftainship of the Cayuse tribe.
"Dr. White bought of Mrs. Whitman a fat ox and presented it to the
Indians. Mrs. W. gave them a fat hog, which they butchered and feasted
upon at night.
"May 25.--A number of the chiefs came early in the morning at Mr. Hines'
request, to settle a difficulty concerning some horses which they gave
to Rev. Jason Lee when he first came to Oregon in 1834, Mr. Lee having
requested Mr. Hines to come to some arrangement with them if possible.
After a long talk we succeeded in settling with them by proposing to
give them a cow for each horse that they had given to Mr. Lee. We found
that the Indians always expected to be well paid for a present."
The Jesuit missionaries and the Hudson's Bay Company had represented to
the Indians that Mr. Lee's receiving their horses and not making them
any presents was the same as stealing from them, and in this way the
American missionary was regarded as having stolen the Indians' horses.
In the conversations and talks the Indians had with Dr. Whitman about
the land the mission occupied, the horses given to Mr. Lee were
generally mentioned. Dr. Whitman was anxious that some arrangement
should be made to settle that matter as soon as he learned the facts in
the case. The Indians, as per arrangement with Mr. Hines, did receive a
cow for each horse given, and thus the matter was satisfactorily
settled.
The Indians having again assembled, Tawatowe came forward and said that
he had made up his mind that he could not accept of the chieftainship,
in consequence of the _difference of his religion_ from that of most of
his people.
Here is Jesuitism and Hudson's Bay, combined with ignorance and
religious bigotry, and shows the influence then operating upon the
savage mind. This Indian declared a reason why he could not accept the
chieftainship, which, four years later, would have fixed at once a crime
upon that sect, without a shadow of doubt in their favor. As it was, the
plan was deeper, and a Protestant Indian, or one that favored the
Protestant cause and American missions, a younger brother of Tawatowe is
selected. Tawatowe resigned, and his brother Five Crows is elected the
American head chief of the Cayuse tribe, with the approval of the
sub-agent of the United States. Bear these facts in mind as we proceed,
that you may fully understand the deep-laid plots of the foreign
influence then operating in the country to secure the whole or a large
portion of it for themselves and their own government.
In connection with this we will give one other incident as related by
Mr. Hines on his tour among the Indians; to show the shrewdness, as also
the long premeditated baseness of the Hudson's Bay Company in their
efforts to get rid of all American missionaries and settlers, and to
bring on a war with the Indians. Mr. Hines and party returned to the
Dalles, and from there Mr. Hines embarked on one of the Hudson's Bay
Company's boats with Mr. Ogden for Vancouver. A short distance below the
Dalles they were driven ashore by a wind storm. While there, Mr. Ogden
told the following story of the killing of a medicine woman, or
doctress:--
"Mr. Ogden related some of his wonderful adventures among the
Indians, with whom he had resided more than thirty years. He was an
eye-witness to a remarkable circumstance that transpired at the
Dalles during one of his voyages up the Columbia.
"He arrived at the Dalles on the Sabbath day, and seeing a
congregation of some three hundred Indians assembled not far from
the river, he drew near to ascertain the cause, and found the Rev.
H. K. W. Perkins dispensing to them the word of reconciliation
through a crucified Redeemer. There was in the outskirts of the
congregation an Indian woman who had been for many years a doctress
in the tribe, and who had just expended all her skill upon a
patient, the only son of a man whose wigwam was not far distant, and
for whose recovery she had become responsible by consenting to
become his physician. All her efforts to remove the disease were
unavailing; the father was doomed to see his son expire. Believing
that the doctress had the power of preserving life or inflicting
death according to her will, and that instead of curing she had
killed his boy, he resolved upon the most summary revenge. Leaving
his dead son in the lodge, he broke into the congregation with a
large butcher-knife in his hand, and, rushing upon the now terrified
doctress, seized her by the hair, and with one blow across her
throat laid her dead at his feet."
This story is a very plausible one, as much so as the one Mr. Hines
tells us on the 110th page of his book, about Smith, Sublet, and
Dripse's partner. There is an object in telling this story at this time
to Mr. Hines, as much so as there was in a letter written by James
Douglas, Esq., to S. N. Castle, Esq., and published in the March number
of the _Friend_, at Honolulu, Sandwich Islands, which we will give in
due time.
The reader will observe in these sketches that our effort has been to
speak of all the principal events and prominent and prospective
influences in our early history, as in the year in which they occurred.
In attending to other duties we have not been able to keep as close to
dates and chronological order as we could wish; still, with patience and
perseverance we can restore the "lost history" of our early settlement
upon this coast, so that the future historian can have the material
before him for an interesting chapter in the history of our country.
We have, in addition to personal and public duties, to wade through an
immense amount of what is called Oregon history, to gather up dates and
events that have been given to the public at different times, without
order, or apparent object, only to write a book on Oregon. We have no
hesitancy in saying that Rev. G. Hines has given to the public the
fullest and best book, and yet there is but a single chapter that is
useful to the historian.
Rev. Samuel Parker has many scientific and useful statements and
observations, but all come in before our civil history began to develop
itself.
CHAPTER XLIII.
The Legislative Committee of nine.--Hon. Robert Moore,
chairman.--Description of the members.--Minutes of their
proceedings.--Dr. R. Newell, his character.--Two specimens of his
speeches.--The dark clouds.
In 1843 the people of Oregon showed signs of life, and sprang into
existence as an American Territory with their provisional government,
which we have allowed to be silently forming in the Wallamet Valley,
while we have traced the operations of the Hudson's Bay Company, and Dr.
Whitman to Washington; and also Dr. White and Mr. Hines among the
Indians, all over the country. This will enable the reader to understand
the strong influences operating against the American settlement; and if
he will go with us, we will introduce him to the first Legislative
Committee of nine, and tell him just what we know of their proceedings
all through their deliberations.
The record shows no instruction from the settlers, as to when or where
the committee should meet to prepare the laws, to report at Champoeg,
only, that they were limited to six days, and to be allowed $1.25 per
day, and that the money be raised by subscription. Every member at once
subscribed to the full amount of his own per diem pay, and in addition
to this, Mr. Alanson Beers, Rev. J. L. Parish, and Dr. Babcock
subscribed the full amount of the board of the whole nine, and the
Methodist Mission furnished without charge the use of their granary at
the old mission, as the first council chamber on this western coast. The
building was a frame some sixteen by thirty feet, one and a half stories
high, boards upright, with one square room in front, and the balance
used for a granary, from which it derived its name; the upper part was
for storing and sleeping use. The square room was used for schoolhouse
and church, and now, for a legislative hall.
We will enter this hall and introduce you to an old gray-headed man with
a fair complexion, bald head, light eye, full face, frequent spasmodic
nodding forward of the head, and a large amount of self-importance, not
very large intellectual developments, with a superabundance of flesh,
sitting by a square-legged table or stand, in a chair with square posts,
and strips of rawhide for bottom; dressed in fustian pants, large blue
vest, and striped shirt, and a common brown coat, who, on motion of Mr.
Hill, was chosen Speaker of the House, and hereafter will be known in
our history as Hon. Robert Moore, Esq.
The first difficulty the committee found was to organize a government
without an executive. They could organize a legislative body, and
appoint all the committees and officers and draft all the laws
necessary, but the folly and absurdity of the effort without an
executive, was so apparent, that the first thing decided upon, was,
Shall we have an executive head, called a governor, or a committee with
executive powers! This was a difficult question, under all the votings
and the discussions that had taken place. The committee were fully aware
of all the opposition they must contend with. The judgeship had passed
by vote of the people at Champoeg from a member of the Methodist Mission
to Mr. A. E. Wilson, an intelligent, unassuming, and excellent young
man, who came to the country in the employ of Mr. Cushing, and had
become a settler.
The committee were well assured that they could eventually secure the
Methodist Mission influence, yet at this time it was extremely doubtful,
and they feared that it would, as in the previous effort of 1841, go
against them, with that of the Catholic Mission and the Hudson's Bay
Company. An executive committee consisting of three men would form a
council that could act in any emergency, and at the same time enable the
Methodist Mission to be represented by one of their members in the
Executive Council.
Alanson Beers was a good, honest, faithful, and intelligent Christian
man, acting with heart and soul with the interests of the settlement and
the American cause. The settlers could rely upon him.
David Hill was a resident of Hillsborough, Tualatin Plains, and was
known to be decidedly opposed to the company, and not any too favorable
to the Catholic and Methodist missions. He could be relied upon so far
as the outside settlers were concerned, and Robert Newell could
represent the Rocky Mountain men and such of the Canadian-French
Hudson's Bay Company, and Roman Catholics as were disposed to join our
organization. It was in consequence of his contending so strongly for
the Hudson's Bay Company's rights, interests, and privileges, at
Champoeg, on the 5th of July, that he was dropped, and Joseph Gale (who
was one of the Ewing Young party to bring cattle from California to the
Wallamet settlement) elected in his place.
With the understanding as above indicated, the Legislative Committee,
consisting of Hon. Robert Moore, David Hill, Robert Shortess, Alanson
Beers, W. H. Gray, Thomas J. Hubbard, James A. O'Neil, Robert Newell,
and William Dougherty, with the uplifted hand solemnly declared before
God that they would faithfully perform the duties assigned them by the
people of this settlement, at Champoeg, on the 2d day of May, A.D.
1843, so far as they understood the duties thus assigned them. W. H.
Gray then by request administered an oath to the Speaker elect, that he
would faithfully and impartially discharge the duties of his office as
presiding officer of the present appointed Legislative Committee of the
people of Oregon, so help you God; to which Beers said, Amen. The
question arose as to the appointment of a clerk for the committee, when
the members agreed, if necessary, to pay his expenses per diem, if no
other means were provided.
George W. Le Breton, a young man of active mind, ready with the pen,
useful and agreeable, and practical in his conversation, having come to
the country as an adventurer in a vessel with Captain Couch, was chosen
secretary and duly qualified by the Speaker. The records of the
proceedings, as published, seem to have left out the preliminary part of
this Legislative Committee's proceedings. This is owing to the fact that
the compiler had no personal knowledge of them, and perhaps sought
information from those as ignorant of the facts as himself; hence the
meager and unsatisfactory document given to the country. Most, or all of
the proceedings thus far mentioned were with closed doors, as will be
seen by the record published. It was not deemed important by Messrs.
Newell, O'Neil, and Hubbard, to have any record of our daily
proceedings, only the result or report. Messrs. Shortess, Beers, Gray,
Dougherty, and Hill thought it best to keep a record, which was
commenced.
"WALLAMET, May 15, 1843.--The Legislative Committee met, and after
the preliminary discussions above alluded to, came to order by
electing Robert Moore, Esq., chairman, and G. W. Le Breton,
secretary.
"On motion of W. H. Gray, a committee of three was appointed by the
chairman to prepare rules and business for the house. This committee
(Messrs. Gray, Shortess, and Newell), at once, in a hasty manner,
prepared eight rules, and suggested the business proposed for the
committee as a whole to perform. The rules were taken up and adopted
with scarcely a single objection. Up to this time no one except
members of the committee had been allowed a place in the house as
spectators.
"On motion, it was decided that the committee sit with open doors.
O'Neil, Hubbard, and Dougherty favored the closed-door sessions, as
they did not want to expose their ignorance of making laws. Newell
thought we had better make as little display as possible, for it
would all be known, and we might be ashamed of what we had done.
"Shortess, Hill, Gray, and Beers were willing that all our efforts
to make laws for ourselves should be fully known, and were ready to
receive instructions and advice from any source. The deliberations
of the committee, they were confident, would not prevent opposition
or aid the opposers of our proposed organization.
"On motion, a judiciary committee was appointed by the Speaker or
chairman, consisting of Messrs. Beers, Hubbard, and Shortess.
"On motion, a committee of ways and means was appointed, consisting
of Messrs. Shortess, O'Neil, and Dougherty."
The minutes at this stage show that there was a doubt as to the
disposition of the Speaker, Mr. Moore, to place the best men as chairmen
of the several committees. Mr. Moore had peculiar notions of his own
about land claims, and had placed upon the committee, I think, Robert
Newell, as favoring his and Dr. McLaughlin's pretensions to the entire
water privileges at Wallamet Falls, which resulted in the appointment as
above stated. The record seems to convey the idea that the first
appointment was conferred by vote. This was not the case. It was the
final action that was repeated and entered.
"On motion, a committee, consisting of Hubbard, Newell, and Gray,
was appointed on military affairs."
We have not the original documents to refer to, but are of the
impression that considerable correction was made in the first day's
journal, and that more should have been made at the time. There was a
little feeling on the part of the Speaker and the writer as to the
necessity of an extended minute, and a disposition on the part of Mr. Le
Breton to do as little writing as possible, not for want of time and
material, but, from the deep interest he took in the discussions, he
seemed to forget his work. I am not prepared to think the compiler has
abridged the minutes, yet such may be the fact.
"On motion, Messrs. Shortess, Dougherty, and Hill were appointed a
committee on private land claims.
"On motion, Messrs. Gray, Dougherty, and Beers were appointed a
committee on districting the Territory into not to exceed five
districts."
This committee, it seems by the motion, was to be appointed by the
chairman or Speaker.
"Adjourned to 8 o'clock, A.M., May 17, 1843.
"The house was called to order by the chairman, and Mr. Gray
appointed secretary, _pro tem._ The session was then opened with
prayer by A. Beers. The minutes of yesterday's session were then
read, corrected, and accepted."
The house then adjourned for one hour and a half to prepare business, at
the expiration of which time they were called to order by the chairman.
The judiciary committee reported progress. The military committee
reported in part; also committee on districts.
"Reports accepted.
"It was moved that there be a standing committee on finance, which
was lost, as the vote at Champoeg had directed that the finance of
the government should be by subscription and voluntary contribution.
"Adjourned to 1.30 P.M.
"House called to order by Speaker.
"On motion, house went into committee of the whole upon reports of
committees, Gray in the chair. It was soon found that the business
before the committee of the whole was not in a shape to be properly
acted upon, and that by an open and informal meeting of the members,
it could be brought into shape for action, or rather that the
several members of the different committees had not had a full
expression upon the reports that were before them, and these
expressions could be shortened by separate committee consultation
and agreement among the members of the several committees; hence an
adjournment of one hour was agreed upon.
"At the close of the hour the house met and agreed, went into
committee of the whole as to the number of districts. The report of
the committee accepted, as amended in committee of the whole."
The question arises here why did not this committee on districts, and
the whole Legislative Committee, specify all north of the Columbia
River?
It will be remembered that the Hudson's Bay Company, with all the
influence and votes they, with the priests, could collect, had met the
settlers at Champoeg on the 2d of May previous, and opposed the entire
organization; and the French priest had sent to the Legislative
Committee a protest against any organization; at least the districting
committee was aware that such would be the case, as the protest already
given was in the hands of Le Breton, the secretary of the committee, and
of the whole house. In specifying the districts beyond the limits named,
or north of the Columbia, the additional votes and personal influence of
the company would be thrown against us. The district committee contended
that that influence and vote would defeat us, and make us an English or
Hudson's Bay Company settlement. We could, without the interference of
the company, manage our own affairs with such of the French settlers as
chose to remain and vote with us. Such as did not like our laws could
have a place to which they could continue their allegiance. Besides, we
were confident we should receive a large immigration in the fall, and in
that case we could extend our settlements and districts and laws to that
section of the country.
Another prominent, and perhaps the most prominent reason of all was, we
were afraid to attempt to enforce any laws we might wish to adopt, or
think necessary among ourselves, upon the servants of the company. We
did not acknowledge their right to enforce any English laws over us, and
we, as the writer thought then, and still thinks, wisely concluded if
they would not openly interfere with us, we would not openly interfere
with them, till we were strong enough to outnumber and control them, as
will hereafter be clearly demonstrated.
The journal of the proceedings of that committee shows that there were
frequent short adjournments. These moments were all occupied in
discussing and agreeing upon some report that was soon to be acted upon,
and in coming to a unanimous vote as to the final result; there was but
one thought and but one object with the majority of the members of the
Legislative Committee.
That thought and object was, to establish the provisional government
they had undertaken to organize. They felt that union in their action
was absolutely necessary, as the opposing elements were so strong, that
without it we must fail, and subject ourselves and the settlement to the
worst possible tyranny and humiliation from Dr. White and the Hudson's
Bay Company.
After the second recess, during the second day, the report of the
military committee was before the house and instructions asked. Newell
was opposed to any military arrangements at all. Hubbard was undecided.
Gray insisted on carrying out the instructions and ideas of the meeting
of the 2d of May in regard to military officers that had been appointed
at that meeting, and in preparing rules to govern them in organizing and
drilling the men. He was unwilling to leave the military power without
any responsibility to any one but themselves; hence instruction was
asked, and given, to proceed as indicated in the meeting at Champoeg,
and prepare a military law, to be included in the articles of organic
compact.
"May 18, 1843.--House met pursuant to adjournment. Session was
opened by prayer. Minutes of yesterday's session read, corrected,
and accepted.
"Robert Newell moved, and was seconded, that a committee be
appointed to prepare a paper for the signature of all persons
wishing an organization."
The reader is already informed of the appearance of the French protest,
and that it was in the possession of Le Breton. It is possible that
Newell may have received it from the French priest. The writer has never
been able to learn the exact facts in the case. At all events Newell's
resolution shows, that however willing and ready he was to commence the
organization of an American government with his _adopted_ countrymen, he
is now in doubt as to the propriety of the step he, with others, had
undertaken.
He presents a resolution to get up a committee to prepare a paper to
circulate among the people, to find out who were in favor of the
organization we were then attempting to bring into shape, under the
instructions already received.
Perhaps the reader will understand Mr. Newell better if he is more fully
informed as to his real genealogy, as there has always been a little
doubt whether he belonged to the American or British nation. From the
best information we could get about him, he was formerly from
Cincinnati, Ohio, and the Rocky Mountains. From the earliest history we
have of him, he has claimed to be an American, and represented the
interests of a foreign monopoly, under a religious belief that he was
conscientiously right in so doing. By keeping himself talking strong
American sentiments to Americans, and acting strongly anti-American
while in the mountains and in the settlement, he succeeded in obtaining
and holding positions to benefit the trade of the Hudson's Bay Company;
also a place in the Legislative Committee, and in the settler's
government, to shield and protect those who were seeking the destruction
of all American trade and influence in the country. He was a man of
quite ordinary ability, yet smooth and insinuating in his manners, with
a great abundance of plausible stories, to make a stranger believe he
was learned in a profession. His real sentiments could never be learned
except by his vote; his thoughts only read by his acts, which always
tended to complicate and confuse legislation. This probably arose from a
disposition to seek popularity and places he was incompetent to fill;
as, also, from the title he assumed in early life, it naturally made him
a hypocrite in action as well as profession. He had not the moral
principle requisite to make known the truth, and to assume his proper
position and be regarded as a plain man without a title. As plain Bob
Newell he could be respected for his natural and genial talent. As _Dr._
Newell he assumes an air to correspond with the title, and shows the
hypocrisy of his life. He was at this time, and has continued to be, a
faithful representative of the Hudson's Bay Company and Jesuit interests
in the country, for which service they should enter his name upon their
calendar of saints. As a public man, we are not aware that he ever
originated a single act or law; but as representing a clique, or the
interests of his masters, he has always been ready to do his utmost in
every possible way. At the time we were called to vote upon Mr. Newell's
first resolution, his position was fully known to but few, yet enough
was understood of his duplicity to reject his proposition at once, and
the house proceeded to amend its rules and add a ninth to those already
adopted.
The report of the military committee was recommitted with instructions
for further notion. Mr. Hubbard was considerably under the influence of
Newell, and in consequence of this fact the military rules or laws were
remodeled in committee of the whole. Newell and Hubbard were disposed to
defeat it altogether as unnecessary, as intimated in the tenth
proposition in the French priest's address. In fact, Mr. Newell acted
all through the proceedings of the Legislative Committee upon the ideas
contained in that address, and opposed all measures looking beyond the
suggestions contained in it.
At this point, the judiciary committee, consisting of Beers, Hubbard,
and Shortess, reported in part on the executive power, and opened the
eyes of Dr. Newell to the awful responsibility and to a full realization
of the fact that a majority of the committee were in favor of an
organization, and a real, actual American government. He took the floor
and commenced: "Wall, reelly now, Mr. Chairman, this 'ere report is a
stumper, I see from the report of this 'ere committee that you are going
on a little too fast. I think you had better find out if we can carry
this thing through before we go too far. We have a good many people that
don't know what we are about, and I think we had better adjourn before
we go too far."
In the midst of this speech, which was a repetition of the reasons for
getting up the paper to find out who were favorable to our proposed
government, the house was so uncourteous as to adjourn and leave the
balance of Dr. Newell's speech unrepeated. Suffice it to say, that in
those short adjournments as noted in the Oregon archives, nearly or
quite all the little differences of opinion were quickly explained and
understood by a majority of the members. The exact subjects that were
before them at the several meetings we have no documents to indicate,
and we can only be governed by such documents as we have, to wit, the
record and our own memory.
Newell was the only prominent opposer of the report of the judiciary
committee, which was prepared by Robert Shortess, to whose memory we are
indebted for a remarkable speech of Hon. Mr. Robert Newell on that
occasion. Mr. Shortess says the discussion was on the question of who
should be deemed voters. Most of the committee were in favor of
universal suffrage, and, as Dr. Newell had a native wife, naturally
supposed he would be quite as liberal as those who had full white
families; but the doctor gave us one of his "stumpers," or, as he calls
it, "_big fir-tree speeches_," by saying: "Wall, now, Mr. Speaker, I
think we have got quite high enough among the _dark clouds_; I do not
believe we ought to go any higher. It is well enough to admit the
English, the French, the Spanish, and the half-breeds, but the Indian
and the negro is a little too dark for me. I think we had better stop at
the half-breeds. I am in favor of limiting the right to vote to them,
and going no further into the dark clouds to admit the negro."
We confess that till Mr. Shortess reminded us of this speech, and the
manner of its delivery, it had escaped our memory, and that, without it,
Mr. Newell could scarcely receive his proper position in the history of
our early struggle for American liberty upon this coast. His position
and the patronage he received from the Hudson's Bay Company were
sufficient for him to work effectually in their interests through all
our struggle.
"At the evening session of May 18, the committee on ways and means
were instructed to prepare a subscription for presenting at the
general meeting, to procure funds to defray the expenses of the
government, after spending a short time in committee of the whole.
"Adjourned till next day.
"May 19, 1843.--House met pursuant to adjournment. Opened with
prayer. Moved that the minutes of the 18th be accepted. Taking the
whole subject of the organization into consideration, Gray presented
the following resolution that a committee of three be appointed to
prepare and arrange all the business that has been done, or may be
done hereafter at this session, revising statutes of Iowa, etc.,
report at the next session of the committee, and request the clerk
to copy the same.
"Resolution adopted.
"Messrs. Gray, Beers, and O'Neil were appointed; these three living
within fifteen miles of each other, it was thought could meet and
superintend and revise the whole proceedings, and get them in shape
for the public meeting.
"Committee of ways and means reported a subscription, which was
accepted, and the military committee reported in part, which was
accepted.
"Adjourned to 2 P.M.
"At 2 P.M. house met. The judiciary committee reported in full.
Report accepted."
On the 20th page of the archives, and in reference to the proviso in the
fourth article of the organic law, the record does not give us the fact.
The proviso referred to was prepared but not included in the original
act, as reported and read at Champoeg, but was adopted at Champoeg. The
report was duly referred to the revising committee, and the proviso left
in the hands of Le Breton to be withheld or presented, as the occasion
might require, in the final action of the people. The large pretensions
to lands by the Methodist and Catholic missions were fully understood by
the entire committee. They wished to curtail them as much as possible,
and were fully aware that any direct action to this end would bring the
whole influence of both missions against them.
CHAPTER XLIV.
Fourth of July, 1843.--Oration by Mr. Hines.--Meeting of July
5.--Debate on the land law.--How the Jesuits and the Hudson's Bay
Company secured their land claims.--Speech of the Rev. G. Hines
against the proposed Executive Committee.--The committee supported
by O'Neil, Shortess, and Lee.--W. H. Gray closes the debate.--The
report of the committee adopted.--Committee appointed to report to
Congress, another to make a Digest of Territorial laws, and a third
to prepare and administer an oath of office.
On the 4th of July our national anniversary was observed, and an oration
was delivered by the Rev. G. Hines. The committee favored the selection
of Mr. Hines as orator, that they might gain his views, and be ready to
meet him on the main questions that would be brought up on the fifth. In
this, however, we failed, as he dwelt principally upon the subjects of
temperance, the glorious deeds of our forefathers on the other side of
the Rocky Mountains, and the influences and blessings of the day. No
Englishman, or foreigner, could have taken any exceptions to his
sentiments or language. On the 5th, Dr. Babcock, chairman of the meeting
of May 2, being absent, the meeting was called to order by G. W. Le
Breton, one of the secretaries of the May meeting. On motion, the Rev.
Gustavus Hines was elected president of the convention by acclamation.
R. Moore, Esq., chairman of the Legislative Committee, presented his
report, which was read by Secretary Le Breton, and on motion accepted.
Rev. L. H. Judson moved that the report of the committee on ways and
means be accepted. This motion brought the land law up for discussion.
The Legislative Committee as a whole reported that law entire, to the
proviso in the fourth article. Upon the first part of that article a
discussion arose between Mr. Newell and the members of the Methodist
Mission, as to the right of any single individual to hold a claim of 640
acres upon a city or town site, or extensive water privilege. Mr. Moore
agreed with Mr. Newell on that question, as he claimed one side of the
Wallamet River at the falls, and Dr. McLaughlin the other. The
Methodist Mission also claimed a right to the east side of the Wallamet,
and the Milling Company claimed the island, upon which they were
erecting mills. Mr. Newell opposed the fourth article, to favor Dr.
McLaughlin; the Methodist Mission and Milling Company favored the
article on the ground that it secured them in their rights, and
prevented a monopoly of that water-power by any single individual. Rev.
Jason Lee was anxious to secure the rights and claims of the Methodist
Mission. So far as the water privilege and town sites were concerned,
there were no fears on the part of the committee, but in reference to
the large claims of the Methodist Mission, there were fears that Mr. Lee
and Mr. Hines would oppose our whole effort, and combine the influence
of their mission against the organization. To satisfy Rev. Jason Lee, Le
Breton presented the proviso as contained in the fourth article, which
removed his objection. The committee were well assured that the Jesuit
missions would claim the same right to land, and in this way, the one
mission would be induced to give up to curtail the other. This occurred
as anticipated, only the Methodist Mission held on to their claims, and
attempted to maintain them publicly, while the Jesuits did the same
thing silently, and by having their lands recorded in the supposed names
of their members, or priests, the same as the Hudson's Bay Company
recorded all their improvements and forts in the names of their
different servants, so as to hold them for the company; the company and
the Jesuits having, as they supposed, secured their own claims to land
in the name of their respective servants, joined with the new
immigrants, in condemning the large pretensions of the Methodist
Mission, and in this way prejudiced the minds of the settlers against it
for doing, openly, just what they had done in the names of their
servants, secretly.
On the final vote there were but few dissenting voices, except upon the
adoption of the proviso. It may be asked why the land law was brought up
first. The minutes as recorded on the twenty-third and twenty-fourth
pages of the Oregon archives, show that Mr. Judson moved the adoption of
the report of the committee on ways and means. This was all the minute
that was made, as the business and discussion progressed. The report on
the land law was deemed, by the committee, to be of the first
importance, as all were personally interested in the law about land
claims; and upon the discussion of that report, they could learn the
result of the whole effort, and the feelings of the people as to the
permanence of the proposed government. The notice of the report of the
committee on ways and means, on page 24, and of the proviso, is entered,
to show that the amendments alluded to were made. We are of the opinion,
that had Mr. Le Breton lived to copy those minutes, he would have so
changed them. He says such amendment and proviso were adopted. To this
fact we have affirmed under oath as being a part of the provisional law
adopted at that meeting. This brings us to the first clause of the
organic law, as adopted by the people in mass convention.
The preamble and first article were adopted on motion of Joseph
McLaughlin, the second son of Dr. John McLaughlin, who took an active
part in favoring the organization, against the wishes and influence of
his family.
The second article was read, and, on motion of L. H. Judson, was
adopted.
The third, on motion of C. McRoy, and the fourth, on motion of Joseph
Holman, were also adopted.
On motion to adopt the fifth article, "on the executive power," it was
plain to be seen that the Rev. Mr. Hines was swelling and becoming
uneasy, in proportion as the Rev. Jason Lee appeared to be satisfied
with the proceedings. He hesitated to put the motion, called Robert
Moore, the chairman of the Legislative Committee, to the chair, and
commenced:--
"Mr. President, gentlemen, and fellow-citizens,--The Legislative
Committee which you appointed to prepare certain laws, and perform a
certain duty, have assumed to present for your approval something
they had no right, in all the instructions given them, to present.
They have commenced a course which, if not checked, will lead to the
worst possible form of despotism. Grant them the privilege which
they now ask, of imposing upon this settlement, upon you and me and
our families, this _hydra-headed monster_ in the shape of an
Executive Committee, and we have but the repetition of the Roman
Triumvirate--the Caesars upon the throne. We may be told by them, in
excuse for the violation of plain and positive instructions, that
they found it difficult to proceed with the organizing of a
temporary government without an executive; and here they have
brought before you this _monstrosity_--this _black bear_--this
_hydra-headed monster_, in the shape of an Executive Committee; and
ask you to adopt it, as necessary to preserve your civil liberties
and rights.
"Gentlemen and fellow-citizens,--You have but to look to past
history, to warn you of the dangers of so palpable a violation of
instructions on the part of public servants. You instructed them to
do a certain work, to prepare certain laws. If they could not do as
instructed, let them resign and go home. So far as they performed
the duties assigned them, we can approve of their acts; but when
they attempt to force upon us what we have not asked of them, but
said to them we do not want this monstrosity with three heads, yet
they persist in saying we do; and have gone on and made their laws
to correspond with this absurd and outrageous thing they call
_Executive Committee_. Is it wise, is it reasonable, that we should
submit to it? What assurance have we that the next Legislative
Committee, or body we may appoint, following the example set by
this one, will not give us a king or emperor, and tell us it is
necessary to complete our organization?"
Many of the persons present at Champoeg on the 5th of July, 1843, will
recollect this speech, and the strong and emphatic manner in which it
was delivered. Why Mr. Hines did not move to strike out the executive
clause has always been a mystery to us. When he had resumed his seat as
president of the convention, Mr. O'Neil made a few remarks, explaining
the position of the committee. Mr. Shortess followed, denying the
assumption of power attributed to the committee, or a disposition to go
beyond their instructions, and urged the necessity of a head or some
controlling influence somewhere. Could we rely upon Captains McCarty, or
McKay, or Smith to call out their companies; or Major Howard? Should the
military control the civil power? "The thing is absurd," said Shortess.
Rev. Jason Lee could not see the proposed executive head of the proposed
provisional government in the light Mr. Hines did. If it was thought
necessary to have a government at all, it was necessary to have a head,
and an executive, or the laws were of no effect.
It was arranged with the Legislative Committee, that Gray should meet
Hines on this question, and make the last speech in favor of the
executive department. Hence O'Neil and Shortess both spoke in favor of
it. Dr. Babcock was opposed, on account of its going beyond present
necessities, and looking too much like a permanent and independent
government; whereas we only wished to form a temporary one. He thought
with Mr. Hines, that the committee had gone beyond their instructions in
providing for this executive power, still he was willing to abide the
decision of the people. There was a little uncertainty us to Mr. Lee's
final vote. Dr. Babcock was clearly against us. Mr. Hines made but the
one speech. From the course the debate had taken, Gray had no fears as
to the final result, and waited until it was evident that no more
opposing speeches would be made when he commenced:--
"Mr. President and fellow-citizens,--The speech which we have just
listened to, from our presiding officer, is in the main correct. It
is true that the Legislative Committee were not instructed to bring
before you an executive department in the laws and government you
proposed to form, when you appointed your committee to prepare those
laws. It is also true, that when that committee met, they found that
they could not advance one step in accomplishing the work you
instructed them to perform, without some supervising influence, or
power, somewhere; in short, without a head. Their instructions were
against a governor. They have provided an Executive Committee, in
place of a single man for governor. This executive head is to act
in the place of senate, council, and governor. This provision is
before you for your approval or rejection. With this Executive
Committee our organization is complete; without it we have no head;
no one to see that our laws are executed, and no one to grant a
reprieve or pardon in case a law should be enforced against the life
or property of any one, for the violation of any law, no matter what
the circumstances connected with that real or supposed violation
might be. The pardon and mercy part of our law is in that '_horrible
hydra-headed monster_' that the gentleman spoke about, and warned us
against; and instead of its being as black as his '_bear_,' it
becomes light and mercy to the erring and the ignorant. As to the
example set by your committee for future despots to rob us of our
liberty, and place over us a king or an emperor, you and I have no
fears so long as we elect our own legislative bodies.
"Now, fellow-citizens, let us look calmly at our true situation. We
are two thousand five hundred miles from any point from which we can
receive the least assistance by land; and seventeen thousand miles
by water. A portion of our community are organized and ready to
protect themselves, and to defend all their rights and interests.
Another organization of a religious character is in our midst,--I
should say, two. They each have a head--an executive. How is it with
us? Who is our head in all that pertains to our civil liberty,
rights, and property? It is possible the gentleman may wish us to
remain as unprotected, as helpless and exposed to all the dangers
that surround us on every hand, as we have heretofore been. If he
does, you, fellow-citizens, I am sure, do not wish to add to his
feebleness by destroying the organization you have commenced,
because he is afraid of what some Caesar did in Rome some centuries
past. We are acting for ourselves and those immediately dependent
upon us for protection. In union there is strength. I believe you
are fully satisfied that your committee have acted honestly, and, as
they thought, for the good of all they represented. If such is the
case, you will approve of their acts, and our organization will be
complete as they have prepared it for this meeting."
On the question being taken, there were but two or three votes against
the executive, or fifth section. Mr. Lee informed the writer that he saw
plainly enough that the meeting was determined to have a government of
some kind, and that probably the Executive Committee was the best at
first. This point gained, the remainder was soon disposed of.
The marriage fee was changed, in the seventeenth article, from three
dollars to one dollar.
The resolution referred to as the nineteenth was: "_Resolved_, That a
committee of three be appointed to draw up a digest of all the laws and
proceedings of the people of this Territory, in relation to the present
provisional government, and the reasons for forming the same; and
forward said digest and report to the Congress of the United States for
their information." Rev. Jason Lee, Rev. Gustavus Hines, and Mr. C. M.
Walker were chosen that committee, and instructed to have access to all
public documents, and to call upon any individual for any information
they might deem necessary in carrying out their instructions.
That committee, so far as performing their duty and carrying out the
wishes of the people were concerned, did the same as the reverend
Legislative Committee did in 1841; they neglected the thing altogether,
and paid no attention to the object of the resolution. Still, at the
present day, when the same reverend gentlemen are charged with having
done all they could against the early settlers' government, they attempt
to repel the charge, and take great credit to themselves for the
perseverance of others in securing permanent laws and protection for
themselves and the settlements.
Messrs. Beers, Hill, and Gale, were chosen by ballot as the first
Executive Committee.
Hugh Burns, who had been chosen at the May meeting as justice of the
peace, had resigned, and Robert Moore was chosen to fill his place.
The committee had prepared a full list of the laws of Iowa, to recommend
for the adoption of the people, which was presented and read, some
slight amendments made, and the list adopted.
The report of the Legislative Committee was adopted as a whole; and on
motion it was "_Resolved_, That the president of the convention assisted
by the Rev. Messrs. Lee, Clark, and Leslie, be a committee to draft and
administer an oath of office to the civil officers elected on the 2d of
May, 1843, and that said officers be required to subscribe to the same;
and administer the oath to the supreme judge, who shall hereafter
qualify all civil and military officers to be elected by the people." At
this point, a question arose in the mind of the last-named committee,
whether they would proceed that night to administer the proposed oath,
or defer it till some other time. There were some earnest and determined
men in that convention, who were not to be defeated at the last moment
by the disposition of these reverend gentlemen to delay the concluding
ceremony of drafting and administering the oath of office to the persons
the people had chosen. To relieve them of all doubt as to the wish of
the convention (although it was then nearly dark), it was moved and
carried, "that the committee to qualify officers proceed to the
performance of their duty, as far as practicable, this evening." Judge
Wilson was not present.
Rev. Jason Lee noticed that Mr. Beers received the smallest number of
votes given for any member of the Executive Committee. This to him, and
probably to Messrs. Leslie and Hines, was unaccountable; but not so to
us, who understood the general feeling of opposition against the rule of
the missionaries and their large claims to land; as also the secret
prejudices excited against them by the Hudson's Bay Company and the
Jesuits, who attributed the entire government movement to them, while
the organization was that of the settlers unaided by any mission, except
individual members of the Protestant missions. This was probably the
reason for the proposition to delay qualifying the officers elected, and
carrying out the decided wish of the convention. This fact simply shows
a reluctant assent to the organization by the principal members of the
missions. The French address showed the feelings of the French and
Catholics, while the Hudson's Bay Company stood entirely aloof from it,
and expected to defeat the whole movement by the influence of such men
as the Rev. G. Hines, Dr. White, Robert Newell, and the Indians.
We have two copies of the organic laws adopted by the people at
Champoeg; one published by Charles Saxton in 1846, and the other by the
compiler of the Oregon archives in 1853. That published by Mr. Saxton
corresponds nearer with our own recollections of the facts of the case;
hence we will copy them as given by him.
CHAPTER XLV.
Organic laws.--Resolutions.--Districts.--Militia law.--Land
claims.--Certificate.
The Legislative Committee recommend that the following _organic laws_ be
adopted:--
WE, the people of Oregon Territory, for purposes of mutual
protection, and to secure peace and prosperity among ourselves,
agree to adopt the following laws and regulations, until such time
as the United States of America extend their jurisdiction over us:--
SECTION I.
_Be it enacted by the free citizens of Oregon Territory_, That the said
Territory, for the purposes of temporary government, be divided into not
less than three, nor more than five, districts; subject to be extended
to a greater number when an increase of population shall require.
For the purpose of fixing the principles of civil and religious liberty
as the basis of all laws and constitutions of government that may
hereafter be adopted, _Be it enacted_, That the following articles be
considered articles of compact among the free citizens of this
Territory.
ARTICLE 1. No person demeaning himself in a peaceable or orderly manner
shall ever be molested on account of his mode of worship or religious
sentiments.
ART. 2. The inhabitants of said Territory shall always be entitled to
the benefit of the writ of _habeas corpus_ and trial by jury, of a
proportionate representation in the Legislature, and of judicial
proceeding according to the course of common law. All persons shall be
bailable, unless for capital offenses, where the proof shall be evident,
or the presumption great. All fines shall be moderate, and no cruel or
unnatural punishments inflicted. No man shall be deprived of his liberty
but by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land; and should the
public exigences make it necessary, for the common preservation, to take
any person's property, or to demand his particular services, full
compensation shall be made for the same. And in the just preservation of
rights and property, it is understood and declared that no law ought
ever to be made, or have force in said Territory, that shall in any
manner whatever interfere with, or affect, private contracts, or
engagements _bona fide_ made and without fraud previously formed.
ART. 3. Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good
government and the happiness of mankind, _schools_ and the means of
education _shall forever be encouraged_.
ART. 4. The utmost good faith shall always be observed toward the
Indians, their lands and property shall never be taken from them without
their consent, and in their property, rights, and liberty, they shall
never be invaded or disturbed, unless in just and lawful wars,
authorised by the representatives of the people. But laws, founded in
justice and humanity, shall, from time to time, be made, for preventing
injustice being done to them, and for preserving peace and friendship.
ART. 5. There shall be _neither slavery nor involuntary servitude_ in
said Territory, otherwise than for the punishment of crimes, whereof the
party shall have been duly convicted.
SECTION II.
ARTICLE 1. _Be it enacted_ by the authority aforesaid, That the officers
elected on the 2d of May instant shall continue in office until the
second Tuesday of May, 1844, and until others are elected and qualified.
ART. 2. An election for civil and military officers shall be held
annually upon the second Tuesday in May in the several districts, at
such places as shall be designated by law.
ART. 3. Each officer heretofore elected, or that shall hereafter be
elected, shall, before entering upon the duties of his office, take an
oath or affirmation to support the laws of the Territory, and faithfully
discharge the duties of his office.