“I had a visit frae auld Joseph Shand the day,” he said to me on one

occasion. “Naething will suit the puir bodie but I maun paint his

picture. I tellt him that I was gey busy juist noo, but I would see what

I could do later on. What do you think he said, sir?--‘If I were to come

round the nicht, efter I’ve gotten ma supper, you could put on the first

coat o’ paint, and syne it would be dry for the second coat the morn’s

nicht.’ Poor auld Joseph, he thinks that a portrait is paintit like a

barn door. He has been oot o’ sorts lately, so I speired what was the

maitter wi’ him. ‘Weel, man,’ he said, ‘I saw the doctor on Monday when

he was owerby, an’ he said it was a stomach tribble. Ye see there’s twa

kinds o’t; there’s disgeestion an’ indisgeestion, an’ the deil a bit o’

me minds whilk o’ them’s the maitter wi’ me.’”

Another day I found him simply bubbling over with merriment over an

encounter he had had with the Free Kirk minister. The minister, in the

course of conversation with him, had made some slighting remarks anent

the Episcopal Church, as being full of empty forms.

“Man,” said Jamie, pretending not to understand what he meant, “ye’re

wrang there; oor kirk has nae empty forms. The ither Sunday nicht we had

the maist o’ the young folks frae the Free Kirk there, as weel as oor

ain; we’ve nae empty forms noo.”

As I have already said, Jamie was an auld-farrant laddie, bright

intellectually and spiritually; brimful of humor, and yet yearning with

all the force of his intense nature to see right into the heart of

things; content to endure great weakness of body, in the full belief

that one day he would leave all his infirmities behind him, and stand

without a single flaw in the presence of his Master. It is many years

now since he shook off the trammels of earth, but, when I meet him again

I shall know him, and shall be glad.

IX. Boycotted

I often look back with longing to the simple rural life we spent in the

dear old parsonage at Drumscondie. We rose early, both summer and

winter; at eight o’clock breakfast was on the table, at one we had

dinner, and at six in the evening we assembled for that delightfully

cosy meal yclept High Tea. Then, in the winter, there was a hurry-scurry

for a little, while the table was being cleared, the dishes washed and

put away, and other domestic duties attended to; after everything was

prepared for the morning, the whole of our little household, including

Janet Spence, our faithful domestic and friend, gathered around the big

open fireplace in the nursery. Mother, daughter and maid took their

sewing, knitting or darning, and all listened while I read aloud from

one of the old favorite works of fiction, or an ancient ballad from the

days of chivalry. George Macdonald’s Alec Forbes and Robert Falconer,

Malcolm Marquis of Lossie and Dooble Sanny with his Stradivarius, Miss

Mulock’s John Halifax and Phineas Fletcher, Sir James the Rose and Sir

Patrick Spens--were very real personages, in whose doings we took the

keenest interest.

Many a happy evening did we spend in such delightful company, and much

food for thought did we gather for the busy future.

I was reading one evening the Siege of Torquilstone from Scott’s

“Ivanhoe,” when an interruption came in the shape of loud knocking at

the kitchen door. I ceased reading while Janet went to see what was the

matter. Presently the trampling of heavy boots was heard on the stairs,

my study door was opened, and then shut, and Janet returned to tell me

that three young men wished to see me. On my entering the study, one of

the visitors whom I had met once or twice before, came forward, and

introduced his companions.

“We’re a deppytation from the Mutual Improvement Society, Maister Gray,”

he said, “an’ we’ve come to ask you if you would be so good as gie us a

lecture some evenin’ soon.”

“A lecture?” I said, “why, I never gave a lecture in my life. I would

gladly be of any service to your Society, but really I fear I am of no

use in the way you mention. I don’t know what I could talk to you

about.”

There was silence for a moment, and then an idea struck me. “I’ll tell

you what I’ll do. I have for some years been trying, in my leisure time,

to find out the origin and history of some of the old Jacobite songs. I

could tell you how these songs came into being--what events in the

romance of the white cockade called them forth--and, if you like, I

would sing some of the songs.”

I could easily see from their faces that this was more than they

expected.

“That would be splendid. We’ve never had onything o’ that kind before.

We’ll lat a’ body ken aboot it, an’ the hall will be crooded.”

“Don’t say too much about it, boys,” I interposed, “because it is only

an experiment.”

We arranged the day and hour, and the deputation departed, much pleased

with the result of their visit.

I collected my notes, made a sketch of the Jacobite story from the

Revolution of 1689 down to the sad defeat at Culloden, and introduced

the most notable of the songs in their proper historical order.

The evening of the lecture arrived, and I proceeded to the place of

meeting. The building known as “The Hall,” had at one time been a Free

Kirk day school, and was still to a great extent in the hands of that

body. My chairman was an old man, very much esteemed in the

neighborhood. In politics he was an ultra-Radical; in religion he was a

Congregationalist of a very narrow type. In introducing me he said very

little, and that of a vague and general character. It was something new

for these folks to hear a parson singing old Scotch songs; some seemed

to look upon it with considerable suspicion; others showed their

enjoyment and appreciation by attending closely to my remarks, and

vociferously applauding my simple rendering of the old ballads. In his

closing remarks the chairman expressed the thanks of the audience to me

for the trouble I had taken, but said he was quite sure “if the young

Pretender were to land on these shores now, the great mass of the people

would rise and drive him back again to the ship which had brought him

hither.”

I saw I had got into a hornet’s nest, but I made no reply. This,

however, was not the end of the matter. Various chats with the young

people of the village led to my opening a night school for them, in the

Hall, on two evenings weekly, and, in the conducting of this, I took

good care that the study of Scottish history had its due share of

attention. For two winters this went on. Beyond opening our meetings

with prayer, nothing of a religious character was introduced. My class

soon included all the young men of the village; and, more out of

gratitude to me than from any other cause, the members of my class took

to attending our Sunday evening services. What our congregation gained

in numbers my Free Kirk neighbor lost, and great was his indignation.

Something must be done to stop the deplorable leakage. Ministers and

elders used their influence individually with the young men, sermon

after sermon was preached to show the delinquents the imminent danger

they were in spiritually from coquetting with Black Prelacy; but, the

results were meagre. The religion of the “Gentle Persuasion,”--that took

a real and living interest in their everyday lives, that aimed at making

their lives brighter and happier, that laid no ban on innocent and

rational pleasures, that took even their recreations under its fostering

care--appealed strongly to their common sense; and, not a few who had

been fed on the dry husks of an effete Calvinism owed their emancipation

from its thraldom, directly or indirectly, to our village night school.

But the Free Kirk Session was not to yield its hold without a further

effort. By fair means or foul, my evening school must be stopped.

At the beginning of my third winter, I went to the “Provost” to arrange

for the use of the Hall, and was told that the trustees had resolved,

contrary to all precedent, to charge me the same fee as they charged any

travelling concert company for every night I used it. At first, I was

dumbfounded. The charge was prohibitive. I went home in despair, to take

counsel with my women-folks. Advice and comfort came, and from a source

whence I never expected it.

Janet, who bore no particular good-will to the Frees, came to the

rescue.

“Ye needna tribble yersel’ about that poor ablich o’ a minister bodie

an’ his elders. There’s plenty o’ room for a’ the laddies in my kitchen.

We’ll get some o’ them to gie’s a haund, and we’ll cairry oot the things

that wad be in the wye, an’ aifter the class is ower, we can easy pit

them a’ back again.”

“But, Janet,” I said, “that’ll mean a lot of work twice every week.”

“Never ye min’ that, we’re nae gaun to hae the good wark stoppit for a

wee bit extra wark.”

And so it was arranged. The class was summoned to a meeting in the

parsonage kitchen, the new scheme was broached, and every one promised

to help. One or two came half an hour earlier on class nights to get

things in order; several of them always stayed behind to restore things

to their wonted order; and the work went on, with more success than

ever. Persecution in a good cause is always productive of good. Even

some of the old folks, who at first were suspicious of anything of the

nature of innovation, expressed their sympathy in no uncertain language.

Davie Paterson, the postman, on his journey round the Brae side, gave a

most amusing account of the whole affair to the Brae dominie, who in

turn retailed it to me.

“That free kirk futtrit thocht he was gaun to pit an end to Maister

Gray’s nicht schule, but, Lord, man, he got sair begowkit. The parsonage

kitchie on a schule nicht is a sicht for sair e’en. I gaed roon ae

evenin’ to hae a word wi’ the minister, an’ got a luik in. Muckle Jamie

Todd, that used to be either blebbin’ an’ drinkin’ at the inn in the

forenichts, or fechtin, was in the neuk, wi’ the meal barrel for a dask,

an’ wis learnin’ gigonometry, or lan’ measurin’, or something o’ that

kind, an’ he wis that eident that he never saw me. The minister himsel’

had a muckle blackboard set up on the dresser, an’ wis giein’ the lave a

lesson in gography. They were a’ as busy as bonnet makkers. Thae Frees

may say what they like, the toon folk are maistly a’ wi’ Maister Gray.

You would think it was Sunday on the schule nichts--the hale place is as

quaiet as pussy. If he’s nae daein’ ony gude, he’s keepin’ a lot o’ them

oot o’ mischief.”

But the boycotting brought even better results than these I have

indicated. A neighboring laird who had for years been an ardent

follower of Kingsley, and a strong Christian Socialist, came to the

front with counsel and material help which ended in our being able to

convert our disused church into a hall for classes and social

gatherings. We opened it on three nights a week as a reading and

recreation room; by and by it was duly enrolled as a school under the

South Kensington Science and Art Department; classes in chemistry,

physiography and agriculture were commenced and carried on with great

success; popular lectures were given on all kinds of useful subjects,

and today there are of our young men not a few in various parts of the

world whose ability to perform the important work committed to them was

largely due, in the first instance, to the narrow-minded policy which

caused the Frees to boycott the “Gentle Persuasion.”

X. The Auld Provost

Tammas Brown, ex-provost of the ancient burgh of Drumscondie, held a

most unique position in the little commonwealth. For many years he had

filled the civic chair; his tenure of the office was still proudly

remembered, and his opinions quoted, by the burgesses of the “toon.” It

was he who bore the cost of restoring the steeple which for over a

century had carried the bell that rung the “curfew.” The “auld provost,”

as he was called, was a notable man in the community. While he never now

interfered openly in civic affairs, he was kept well posted as to all

the doings of the “Cooncil,” and it was well known that to attempt any

scheme which did not have his approval was to court certain failure.

His successor was a “hairmless, haverin’ bodie,” not overstocked with

prudence, and certainly not over-burdened with wisdom; and, had there

not been sometimes the unseen influence of Tammas Brown at work, things

would not have gone as smoothly as they did.

Speaking of Willie Dundas, the provost in my day, I am reminded of an

amusing incident that well illustrated his crass ignorance and

self-conceit. He had gone to spend a day or two in his native village of

Friockheim, about twenty miles from Drumscondie. On his return he was

met at the railway station by a member of the “Toon Cooncil,” and the

two men walked home together, discussing current events. During his

absence there had been a solar eclipse, which caused quite a commotion

among the villagers.

“Aye, Provost, an’ did you see the eclipse?” said the Cooncillor.

The great man was amazed at the question, and replied in a tone that was

meant to crush the questioner:

“Man, Donald, I wonder at ye speerin’ sic a thing; hoo cud I see the

eclipse, an’ me at Friockheim?”

Nothing so uplifted Willie as to have to preside at any public meeting

in the Toon Hall. For a day or two previously he would be in such a

state of excitement that any work in his shop, short of a coffin to be

made, was entirely out of the question. Several times a day he would

have to “gang doon the toon on business,” which meant on each occasion

one or two bottles of ale, with cronies, at the inn; and it generally

happened that by the time he came to mount the platform, he was prepared

to make a speech that would take the palm as the most amusing item on

the programme. One Hallowe’en night a party of musical folks had given

an entertainment in the “Hall,” in aid of some contemplated local

improvements. The Provost rose to thank the visitors for their kindly

help. “Gentlemen an’ ladies,” he said, “A’m sure we’re a’ vera muckle

obleeged to the freens that’s fushen ye here the nicht. Ye’ve gien us a

concert that couldna be beaten in the big toon o’ Aiberdeen. I howp

we’ll a’ gang hame like gude bairns, an’ be thankfu’ that we leeve in

sic an enlichtened toon. There’s a heap mair I could say aboot it;

but--but--I mean--I think we’ll draw the meetin’ to a con--con close,

wi’ a verse o’ the netteral anthum. Whaur’s the precentor? Oh! ye’re

there, are ye, Rob? Just strike up--“God Save the Queen.”

Tammas Brown’s remarks on his successor were more forcible than polite.

“What in a’ the worrld gars the useless, bletherin’ cratur stand up and

mak’ a fule of hissel’ an’ the Toon Cooncil? He fair bates a’. Gin I

had a neep (turnip)--big eneuch, I could mak’ a better man oot o’t wi’

my knife.”

Tammas was an Episcopalian of a type that is fast passing away, more’s

the pity. In his young days he had received his religious training under

a succession of clergy who had imbibed freely of the teaching of the

great Oxford Revival. Church doctrine was set forth with no uncertain

sound; but, there was no attempt at anything of the nature of

ceremonial. The services in St. John’s were plain but reverent. There

was no chanting of the Psalms--priest and people read them antiphonally,

Tammas leading the people’s part in clear stentorian tones. He had a

perfect horror of anything that savored of ritualism.

During my first winter there the heating arrangements of the church were

not of a very satisfactory kind, and on several occasions we were nearly

frozen out. I had contracted a severe cold in my head, and to protect my

bald pate had taken to wearing a small silk skull-cap. For several

Sundays no notice was taken of this; but one day the storm burst. I was

taking off my surplice in the vestry when the door opened and Tammas

stood before me. His face was severe; my greeting fell unheeded. He

pointed to the cap, and said sternly:

“We want nane o’ thae Popish things here, Maister Gray. Thae bannets may

do a’ vera weel among the puir craturs in Edinbro that ken nae better,

but they’ll no do here.”

I assured him that our own Bishop himself wore one; but that argument

was worse than useless.

“What kens he about the auld sufferin’ Scottish Church? He’s only an

Englishman. We’re no oonder the English Church, although we’re in

communion wi’ her. We have a history that gangs as far back as hers,

an’ we’re no to get the fashion set by a wheen mim-moothed bits o’

curates that introduce a’ kinds o’ trumpery to please idle weemonfolk.”

Here was a storm in a teacup. I saw it was no use discussing the

question, so I quietly replied:

“Well, well, Provost, I’ll be very glad to follow the example of godly

Bishop Jolly, who wore a full-bottomed wig. How do you think that would

suit you?”

He was too serious about the matter to take a joke, so I put the cap in

my pocket, and assured him that I would not permit such a trivial thing

to give him any worry and here the matter ended.

For a clergyman to wear a straw hat or anything except the orthodox

clerical head-gear was to him almost sacrilege; indeed, any change from

the conservative fashions of his youth met with his strongest censure.

It took me a considerable time to sound his depths, and understand his

idiosyncrasies; but when I at last succeeded in getting into touch with

him, I learnt to esteem him highly.

The first glimpse I got of his real inwardness was on the occasion of a

visit which he and I paid to Glasgow to attend the annual meeting of the

Church council. It was his first visit to the west, and I did my best to

make it a pleasant one. I took him through the grand old Gothic

cathedral and pointed out its beauties as best I could. It was a

wonderful revelation to the old man. He said very little until we were

just about to leave the building. One last look he must have; and, as he

stood in the centre of the nave and gazed up at the finely moulded

arches and the lovely tracery of the windows, he exclaimed in a voice

quivering with emotion.

“No man need ever tell me that this place was biggit for cauld

Presbyterian worship. Na, na, the men that biggit this worshipped God in

the beauty of holiness. Aye, Maister Gray, thae forebears o’ ours had a

wonnerful grip o’ the Faith, an’ they’ve left their belief in the walls,

an’ roof, and even in the foondation o’ this grand biggin’. It’s a

pairfit pictur’ o the speeritual temple that the Maister wants us to

raise. The foondation taks the form o’ the cross, to teach us that oor

real life maun be based on sacrifice; there’s the sacred number

three--teepical o’ the Trinity--in the three aisles leadin’ up to the

altar; an’ syne, there’s the nave--that’s the Church Militant--an’ the

choir--that’s the Church in Paradise--an’ the sanctuary--that’s the

Church Triumphant. There’s a heap mair, if a bodie only took time to

find it oot. Lang, lang syne, I mind on the dean tellin’ us aboot a’

this in a sermon; but I never had ony idea before hoo it could a’ be set

furth. I wad na hae missed this graund sicht for onything.”

How short-sighted I had been in my estimate of the “auld provost!”

I could hardly believe that the simple countryman who stood before me,

his face aglow with enthusiasm, pointing out with a keenness of

perception that was wonderful the beautiful teachings of Gothic art, was

the man whom I had hitherto supposed to be devoid of emotion. To say

that I was thunderstruck but feebly expresses my feelings. Now I knew

him as I had never known him before. Now I knew that under the reserve

of his cold, austere outer shell there was a depth of devotional feeling

to which he rarely gave vent in words.

Had he lived in the days of the Nonjurors, when it was a crime in

Scotland to be an Episcopalian, he would have been one of the staunchest

of the “faithful remnant.” Of his own personal religion he would have

said little; but, when necessity arose, he would have been ready with a

reason for the faith that was in him.

Now I could see that the “auld provost” was one of those who kept the

precious things of the spiritual life locked up in the sacred repository

of his heart, and who with Lady Nairne, the poetess, felt that “religion

ought to be a walking and not a talking concern.”

The vestry of St. John’s, in whose hands lay the management of the

temporal affairs of the parish, consisted at this time of four members,

with myself as chairman. All the four were men worthy of note.

The “auld provost,” of whom I have been speaking, was secretary and

treasurer.

The Honorable James Stewart, the laird of Strathfinlas, was of Scottish

birth and upbringing, but a graduate of the English University of

Cambridge. Succeeding to the estate after he had passed middle life, he

had set himself to carry out the principles of Christian Socialism,

which he had learned at the feet of Kingsley, Maurice and Fawcett. His

neighbor lairds smiled at his enthusiasm, and looked on him as a

harmless faddist; but he went on his way, and very soon gained the

esteem and affection of the tenantry, as well as the retainers on his

lovely demesne.

Andrew Blair had been for many years a successful railway contractor,

but even in his busiest times had never ceased to maintain a warm

interest in all that concerned the best welfare of the ancient Scottish

Church. Now that he had taken to the quiet life of a farmer his interest

in church affairs was intensified.

Adam Skene was a tradesman in the village of Dunluther, on the southern

side of the cairn. His flowing beard of snowy white marked him out as

one of the fathers of the congregation; but, in spite of advancing age,

it was something of very grave import which would keep him at home on

the weekly day of rest. Staff in hand, he trudged the seven miles of

hill road, Sunday after Sunday, in order that he might worship with the

brethren of his father’s faith.

Many an earnest discussion did these four worthies have in the dear old

parsonage at the quarterly meetings of the vestry. Seldom was there

anything of the nature of friction, although sometimes I had to exercise

some tact to keep the provost and Andrew Blair from misunderstanding the

somewhat novel ideas put forth by the laird.

When I proposed a weekly celebration of the Holy Communion at an early

hour, Mr. Stewart warmly supported me. Adam Skene, who was always

willing to be led by those better educated than himself, raised no

objection. Andrew Blair had sent his sons to one of the schools of the

Woodardian foundation, where they had received careful instruction in

sacramental life, and so he knew somewhat of the stirring among the

Church’s dry bones. He was at least willing to hear all that could be

said in favor of the proposed innovation.

The provost alone was in opposition. He listened while the others

expressed their approval--and, then, in awe-inspiring tones, he gave his

verdict:

“I’m no sayin’, Maister Gray, but what ye mean weel in what ye propose,

but, for my part, I think ye’d better leave things as they are. I wadna

mind noo an’ then, on the greater feasts, maybe, haein’ what ye ca’ an

early celebration, but tak’ ye care lest ye mak’ sacred things ower

common. When the auld dean was preparin’ me for my first Saycrament, he

spak’ a heap aboot oor preparation for the ordinance, an’ I would just

be feared that your new plan micht lead some o’s, speecially the young

fowk, to gang forrit oonprepared. I dinna doot that what ye say aboot

the early Chistians is true eneuch; but, ye maun mind that there was

less risk o’ them dishonorin’ the Lord’s Body than wi’ maist o’ us. The

very persecution they had to thole frae the heathen was eneuch to keep

them richt. But nooadays we’re free frae ony interference, an’ can

worship as oor conscience tells us; an’ maybe we’re juist ready eneuch

to tak’ things easy. For ma pairt I’ll e’en be content wi’ the auld way

that my father had afore me.”

My youthful zeal made me inclined to slight the old man’s caution. I

carried out my proposal, and, I feel sure that it was wisely done, even

if it was the cause of a little coolness, for a time. The Auld Provost

was not unreasonable, and I think he saw the good that had been

effected.

XI. The Major

The Gentle Persuasion: Sketches of Scottish Life · 第 4 / 5 段