CHAPTER XXX.

EUROPEANS IN INDIA.

The climate of India precludes the possibility of its being a sphere for

European colonization. With the exception of the hill districts, the

intense heat during the greater part of the year makes out-door

occupation trying even to the native, and well-nigh unendurable for

Europeans--a heat uncompensated by the coolness of the night, for in the

North-West, at least, the stifling closeness of the night is more trying

than the heat of the day. If this heat lasted for only a few days, as in

Southern Australia, it might be borne, though a hindrance to work; but

in India it lasts for months, and it is succeeded by months of drenching

rain, during a great part of which the moisture and mugginess are as

unpleasant as the previous dry heat had been.

Apart from climate, there is no room for us as colonists. In India we

have not to do with rude tribes, as in America, New Zealand, and

Australia, and in a measure in Southern Africa, that cannot be said to

possess the land over which they and their fathers have long roamed, or

of which they have cultivated a very small part. We have to do with

ancient nations that have taken full possession of the land by

cultivation of the soil, and by pursuit of the arts of civilized life.

We find in India no tribes wasting away before the white stranger, but

a people growing in number under the security of our government. There

are districts in the North-West more densely peopled than any districts

in Europe occupied by an agricultural population. The emigration of

coolies to the Mauritius, to Bourbon, to the coast of South America, and

to the West Indian Islands, has done little to relieve the pressure.

Migration to unoccupied parts of Central India and Assam has been

carried out to a small extent, and it is very desirable this migration

should increase. Non-Aryan tribes occupy a large part of the mountains

and forests of Central and Eastern India. They have no wish for

accession from the people of the plains, and still less do they wish for

the entrance of Europeans. I can say nothing about the mountains of the

South, but so far as I have travelled over the sub-Himalayan range in

the North there is no place for Europeans in it, except for officials or

employers, and managers of native labour, such as tea-planters.

While India presents no sphere for European colonization, it presents an

increasingly wide field for European agency in the civil and military

services, in the departments of education, commerce, manufacture--for

instance, of cotton goods, railways, indigo, and tea. In these different

departments Europeans are in constant intercourse with natives of every

class from the highest to the lowest. There is often much pleasant and

courteous intercourse between them; but in language, habits, religion,

in almost everything in which human beings can be separated from their

fellows, they are so different that they remain to a great degree

strangers to each other, however kindly may be their mutual feeling.

English people never call India "home," though they may have lived in it

the greater part of their life. This name is always reserved for our

fatherland. (I had better say that the term English, as used in India,

includes all from Great Britain and Ireland, and to them also the term

European is mainly, though not exclusively, applied.) I have heard

persons of pure English descent, who had never been out of India, speak

of England as "home." The reservation of the word to the land from which

we have gone, indicates the fact that in India we are strangers, and

cannot cease to be strangers. Colonists in America and other lands may

make a similar reservation; but living as they do among their own

people, in a country which they expect to be the home of their

descendants, the term as applied to England is deprived of much of its

endearing force.

[Sidenote: EUROPEAN AND NATIVE INTERCOURSE.]

In the great Presidency cities, and in a less degree in other cities

throughout the country, we have a large educated class of natives, who

are well acquainted with our language and literature. They have pursued

their studies in the hope of securing good situations, and this hope is

in a large measure realized. They are found all over Northern India

occupying responsible and well-paid positions. Many persons of this

class come daily into close intercourse with Europeans in the discharge

of their duties, and have means of knowing them which no other class

possesses. The intercourse is generally courteous, in not a few cases

friendly, and they talk freely with each other on a great variety of

subjects. There is, however, not infrequently an underfeeling with

educated natives that they are not sufficiently appreciated--that they

do not get the place due to them--that they are treated as an inferior

race; and there is consequently a suspiciousness fatal to cordiality. I

am far from thinking that Europeans always treat educated natives with

the courtesy due to them. I have known instances of marked discourtesy;

but I am sure many of our people are bent on treating them with all

justice and kindness, and sometimes, at least, this friendly feeling has

not been reciprocated. Human nature being what it is, however much we

may regret, we need not wonder at the grating between parties that have

so much in common, and yet owing to that very circumstance have clashing

feelings and interests.

Many native gentlemen, some of the highest rank, cultivate European

society, and every European who has anything of the gentleman in him

treats them with the courtesy due to their position. Natives of this

class are, as a rule, most gentlemanly in their demeanour, and

intercourse with them is very pleasant.

[Sidenote: THE FAITHFULNESS OF SERVANTS.]

Between Europeans and most natives with whom they have to do, there is

such a difference of station there is no room for jealousy. To some

Europeans they stand in the relation of agents, clerks, and labourers;

to a greater number in the relation of servants. In India, as in our own

country, there is a great variety in the character of both masters and

servants. There, as here, there are hard, selfish, unreasonable masters

and mistresses, and there are undoubtedly bad, false, dishonest

servants; but I have no hesitation in giving my impression--I may say

stating my belief--that native servants are generally well treated, and

that this treatment draws forth no small degree of gratitude and

attachment. This was strikingly shown in the Mutiny period. Servants

often remain for years with the same masters, render most useful and

faithful service; their wages are continued in whole or in part during

the temporary absence of their masters from India; on their return they

are found waiting for them at the port of debarkation, and on final

departure for Europe it is not unusual for old Indians to pension those

who have been faithful to them. When I speak of faithfulness, I do not

mean that, with the exception of very rare cases, full dependence can be

placed on their truthfulness, or even on their honesty in the strict

sense of the term. It is very difficult for them to resist the

temptation to tell a lie, when a fault is to be screened or benefit to

be obtained, and there are certain understood perquisites of which they

are inclined to avail themselves in too liberal a degree; but they are

at the same time very careful to guard the property of their master

against all others, and are deeply concerned for the honour of his name.

As a rule natives, both servants and others, are treated with less

justice and kindness by the lower class of Europeans than by persons

better educated and of a higher position. There are indeed soldiers and

others who look on "niggers," as they call all natives, with contempt,

and are inclined to abuse them, so far as they are permitted, to the

full bent of their rude nature. The term "nigger" is used by some who

call themselves gentlemen. All I can say of such gentlemen is that I

wish they would speak in a manner worthy of the name.

Of late years the position of Englishmen in India has greatly changed.

By the overland route, and by the weekly postal communication, England

and India are brought near to each other in a degree which could not

have been deemed possible in former days. Persons on leave for three

months can now spend a month or five weeks with their friends in

England, and at the end of their leave be ready to resume their duties.

Every week a stream of literature, in the shape of newspapers,

periodicals, and books, is poured over every part of India, reaching

the European in the most remote part of the land. Hill stations have

become very accessible by rail, and to these Europeans betake themselves

in great numbers for the hot months. All these things give greater force

than ever to the home feeling, by strengthening home sympathies and

ties. The result is our people in India are birds of passage as they

never were before, ready to return to their own land as soon as

circumstances will allow them.

There are some advantages from this altered state of things. Many of the

early residents became, to their own deep injury, too intimate with the

people of the land. They learned their ways, and became like them in

character. It was often said, when the Mutiny broke out, that the

officers of native regiments had in former days maintained friendly

intercourse with the Sepoys, and thus secured their attachment, and that

the cessation, or at least the lessening, of this intercourse was one

great cause of the outbreak. If good resulted from it in the weakening

of national antipathy, in many cases evil resulted from it in the

deterioration of character. Many of our countrymen at an early period

formed native connections, and by doing so brought themselves down to

the level of their new friends. Some became so entangled that they gave

up all thought of returning to their own country. It must not be

supposed that all who settled down in India for life were of this

character. Some who had kept themselves aloof from all improper

connection with natives became so attached to India and to the mode of

living there, that they made it their permanent abode. A few of this

class remain, but their number is rapidly decreasing, and none are

taking their place. The persons who have thus made India their home

have often had a large circle of attached native friends.

The constant communication of Englishmen with their native land,

frequent visits to it, and the anticipation of getting away from India

at the earliest possible period, tends to lessen their interest in

Indian affairs, and weaken their sympathy with the native population.

The closer connexion with England is, however, attended with some

advantages. It can be confidently affirmed that many of our countrymen

in India are bent on promoting the good of the people with whom they

come into contact, and strive to perform their duties faithfully. We may

hope that home influence may strengthen them for the more efficient

discharge of their work, and may thus prove a benefit to the people.

[Sidenote: IMPROVEMENT OF EUROPEAN SOCIETY.]

In many respects there has been a marked improvement in European

society. The small house near the large one, significantly called the

Zenana, is never seen near the houses of recent erection. Even in the

smaller stations there are places for Christian worship, where Europeans

meet on the Lord's Day, when some official reads the prayers of the

Church of England, and, if he be a zealous man, a sermon. A chaplain

pays occasional visits to these places. The attendance on public worship

is far from being what it ought to be, and we have much reason to fear

it is often very formal; but it furnishes a pleasing contrast to the

neglect which formerly prevailed. Along with this church-going there is,

no doubt, a great deal of unbelief in India. I have already said we have

in India Christians who are earnest for the honour of their Lord, and do

all they can to promote His cause; but the greater number of our people

are not, and have never been, friendly to the propagation of the

Gospel. I am afraid the unfriendliness has been increased by the

sceptical tone of much of the literature of the day. I have known

gentlemen giving to their native subordinates for perusal periodicals

and books which could only lead them to the conclusion that Christianity

was dying out in England.

There are, happily, counteracting influences. Christian as well as

sceptical literature makes its way to India, and is telling on many

minds. And then, at our larger stations, where Europeans and Eurasians

are in the greatest number, more is done for their spiritual benefit

than at any previous period. Well may every Christian heartily desire

success to all such effort, for nothing would do more to bring the

people of the land to the feet of Jesus than the prevalence of living

godliness among our own countrymen.

[Illustration]

Life and Work in Benares and Kumaon, 1839-1877 · 第 30 / 31 章