It was not so long before that the fame began to spread of t

Other Works by Walter Crane

_Crown 8vo, 6s. net each_

THE BASES OF DESIGN

WITH 200 ILLUSTRATIONS

LINE AND FORM

WITH 157 ILLUSTRATIONS

THE DECORATIVE ILLUSTRATION

OF BOOKS OLD AND NEW

WITH 165 ILLUSTRATIONS

_Medium 8vo. 10s. 6d. net_

IDEALS IN ART

PAPERS THEORETICAL, PRACTICAL,

CRITICAL

WITH TITLE-PAGE, END-PAPERS, AND COVER

DESIGNED BY THE AUTHOR, AND

NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS

LONDON: G. BELL AND SONS, LTD.

WILLIAM MORRIS

TO WHISTLER

[Illustration:

WILLIAM MORRIS

TO WHISTLER

PAPERS AND ADDRESSES ON

ART AND CRAFT AND THE

COMMONWEAL

BY WALTER CRANE

WITH ILLUSTRATIONS

FROM DRAWINGS BY THE

AUTHOR & OTHER SOURCES

LONDON: G BELL & SONS LTD

YORK HOUSE PORTUGAL S^T W.C.

1911

]

CHISWICK PRESS: CHARLES WHITTINGHAM AND CO.

TOOKS COURT, CHANCERY LANE, LONDON.

PREFACE

Of the collected papers and addresses which form this book, the

opening one upon William Morris was composed of an address to the Art

Workers' Guild, an article which appeared in "The Progressive Review,"

at the instance of Mr. J. A. Hobson, and a longer illustrated article

written for "The Century Magazine," and now reprinted with the

illustrations by permission of Messrs. Charles Scribner's Sons, to

whom my thanks are due.

"The Socialist Ideal as a New Inspiration in Art" was written for "The

International Review," when it appeared under the editorship of Dr.

Rudolph Broda, as the English edition of "Documents du Progrès."

"The English Revival in Decorative Art" appeared in the "Fortnightly

Review," and I have to thank Mr. W. L. Courtney for allowing me to

reprint it. It has some additions.

"Notes on Early Italian Gesso Work," was written for Messrs. George

Newnes's Magazine of the Fine Arts with the illustrations, and I am

obliged to them for leave to use both again.

"Notes on Colour Embroidery and its Treatment" was written at Mrs.

Christie's request for "Embroidery," which she edited, and I have

Messrs. Pearsall's authority to include it here.

"The Apotheosis of 'The Butterfly'" was a review written for "The

Evening News," and I thank the editor for letting me print it again.

It appears now, however, with a different title, and considerable

additions.

"A Short Survey of the Art of the Century" appeared in a journal, the

name of which has escaped me, but it has been largely rewritten and

added to since.

For the rest, "Modern Aspects of Life and the Sense of Beauty" was

originally addressed as the opening of a debate at the Pioneer Club,

in which my late friend Lewis F. Day was my opponent, and my chief

supporter was Mr. J. Ramsay Macdonald, M.P.

"Art and the Commonweal" was an address to the Students of Art at

Armstrong College, Newcastle-on-Tyne, and the paper "On Some of

the Arts allied to Architecture" was given before the Architectural

Association. That "On the Study and Practice of Art" was delivered in

Manchester before the Art School Committee and City authorities, and

the "Notes on Animals in Art" to the Art Workers' Guild in London.

WALTER CRANE.

KENSINGTON,

_September 1911_.

CONTENTS

PAGE

WILLIAM MORRIS AND HIS WORK 3

THE ENGLISH REVIVAL IN DECORATIVE ART 47

THE SOCIALIST IDEAL AS A NEW INSPIRATION IN ART 83

ON THE STUDY AND PRACTICE OF ART 105

ON SOME OF THE ARTS AND CRAFTS ALLIED TO ARCHITECTURE 125

NOTES ON COLOUR EMBROIDERY AND ITS TREATMENT 149

NOTES ON EARLY ITALIAN GESSO WORK 163

NOTES ON THE TREATMENT OF ANIMALS IN ART 185

MODERN ASPECTS OF LIFE AND THE SENSE OF BEAUTY 207

A SHORT SURVEY OF THE ART OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY,

CHIEFLY IN ENGLAND, WITH SOME NOTES ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS 223

ART AND THE COMMONWEAL 241

THE APOTHEOSIS OF "THE BUTTERFLY" 259

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

PAGE

Portrait of William Morris. From a photograph by Emery Walker 2

Pen-Sketch of Morris Speaking from a Wagon in Hyde Park.

By Walter Crane 15

Design for Wall-paper. "The Daisy" 18

Design for Wall-paper. "Rose Trellis" 19

Woollen Hanging. "The Peacock" 22

Design for Silk Hanging 23

Cotton Print. "Evenlode" 25

Kelmscott House. Meeting Room of the Hammersmith

Socialist Society 27

Pages from Morris's MS. of Omar Khayyám 30, 31, 32, 33

Pen Design by Walter Crane 47, 83

Progressive blackboard practice in Bi-Manual Training

from "New Methods in Education" by Liberty Tadd 109

Patterns of Roman Mosaic Pavement, from the Baths of

Caracalla 129, 130, 131

Patterns in Plain Leading, from "The Glazier's Booke" 143

Russian Peasant Embroidery: Blouse in Cross Stitch 151

Cretan Embroidery 153

Embroidered Cover from Bokhara 155

Original Design for Embroidered Hanging, by Walter Crane 157

Examples of Early Italian Gesso Work

(Victoria and Albert Museum) 167-181

Egyptian Treatment of Birds. Eighteenth dynasty, Hieroglyphics.

Thebes 186

Assyrian Lion 187

Persian Lion 188

Egyptian Lion 188

Graeco-Buddhist Lions from Sarnath 189

Animal Forms from Early Greek Pottery 191

English Heraldic Lions. Thirteenth Century 193

Birds and Animals in Sicilian Textiles. Thirteenth Century.

(From Fishbach) 195, 196, 197

Japanese Birds. From the "Hundred Birds" of Bari 199

Stone Carvings at Gwalior 200, 201, 202, 203

Lion by Alfred Stevens 204

Pen Designs by Walter Crane 207, 223, 241

Butterfly Device 259

Portrait of Whistler. After Charcoal Drawing by Himself 261

"The Thames in Ice" 267

Panels from the Peacock Room 269

ERRATA (TN: These corrections have been applied.)

Page 50, line 4 from foot, _for_ "Burgess" _read_ "Burges."

Page 92, line 2, _for_ "Le Thangue" _read_ "La Thangue."

Page 134, line 14, _for_ "give" _read_ "gives."

Page 190, line 7 from foot, _for_ "Fringe" _read_ "Frieze."

Page 198, line 2 from foot, _for_ "Central Provinces" _read_ "Central

India."

WILLIAM MORRIS AND HIS WORK

[Illustration: PORTRAIT OF WILLIAM MORRIS. FROM A PHOTOGRAPH

BY EMERY WALKER.]

WILLIAM MORRIS AND HIS WORK

If it is agreed that art, after all, may be summed up as the

expression of character, it follows that the more we realize an

artist's personality the clearer understanding we shall get of his

work. So remarkable a personality as that of William Morris must have

left many distinct, and at the same time different, impressions upon

the minds of those who knew him, or enjoyed his friendship in life.

It is difficult to realize that fifteen years have passed away since

he left us; but from the dark and blurred background of changing

years his character and work define themselves, and his position and

influence take their true place, while his memory, like some masterly

portrait, remains clear and vivid in our minds--re-presented as it

were in the severe but refined draughtsmanship of time.

With so distinct and massive an individuality it was strange to hear

him say, as I once did, that of the six different personalities he

recognized within himself at different times he often wondered which

was the real William Morris! Those who knew him, however, were aware

of many different sides, and we know that the "idle dreamer of an

empty day" was also the enthusiastic artist and craftsman, and could

become the man of passionate action on occasion, or the shrewd man of

business, or the keen politician also, as well as the quiet observer

of nature and life. Even the somewhat Johnsonian absoluteness and

emphasis of expression which characterized him generally, would

occasionally give way to an open-to-conviction manner, when tackled by

a sincere and straightforward questioner.

But Morris was above and before all else a poet--a _practical_ poet,

if one may use such a term--and this explains the whole of his work.

Not that personally he at all answered to the popular conventional

idea of a poet, rather the reverse, and he was anything but a

sentimentalist. He hated both the introspective and the rhetorical

school, and he never posed. He loved romance and was steeped in

mediaeval lore, but it was a real living world to him, and the

glimpses he gives us are those of an actual spectator. It is not

archaeology, it is _life_, quite as vivid to him, perhaps more so than

that of the present day. He loved nature, he loved beautiful detail,

he loved pattern, he loved colour--"_red_ and _blue_" he used to say

in his full-blooded way. _His patterns are decorative poems_ in terms

of form and colour. _His poems and romances are decorative patterns_

in forms of speech and rhyme. His dream world and his ideal world

were like one of his own tapestries--a green field starred with

vivid flowers upon which moved the noble and beautiful figures of

his romantic imagination, as distinct in type and colour as heraldic

charges. Textile design interested him profoundly and occupied him

greatly, and one may trace its influence, I think, throughout his

work--even in his Kelmscott Press borders. One might almost say that

he had a textile imagination, his poems and romances seem to be woven

in the loom of his mind, and to enfold the reader like a magic web.

But though he cast his conceptions in the forms and dress of a past

age, he took his inspiration straight from nature and life. His poems

are full of English landscapes, and through the woods of his romances

one might come upon a reach of the silvery Thames at any moment. The

river he loved winds through the whole of his delightful Socialistic

Utopia in "News from Nowhere."

As a craftsman and an artist working with assistants and in the course

of his business he was brought face to face with the modern conditions

of labour and manufacture, and was forced to think about the political

economy of art. Accepting the economic teaching of John Ruskin, he

went much further and gave his allegiance to the banner of Socialism,

under which, however, he founded his own school and had his own

following, and conducted his own newspaper. From the dream world of

romance, and from the sequestered garden of design, he plunged into

the thick of the fight for human freedom, in which, he held, was

involved the very existence of art.

Ever and anon he returned to his sanctuary--his workshop--to fashion

some new thing of beauty, in verse or craftsmanship, in which we see

the results of his labour in so many directions.

He certainly seemed to have possessed a larger and fuller measure of

vitality and energy than most men--perhaps such extra vitality is

the distinction of genius--but the very strenuousness of his nature

probably shortened the duration of his life. There were never any

half-measures with him, but everything he took up, he went into

seriously, nay, passionately, with the whole force of his being. His

power of concentration (the secret of great workers) was enormous, and

was spent from time to time in a multitude of ways, but whether in the

eager search for decorative beauty, his care for the preservation of

ancient buildings, in the delight of ancient saga, story, or romance,

or in the battle for the welfare of mankind, like one of his own

chieftains and heroes, he always made his presence felt, and as the

practical pioneer and the master-craftsman in the revival of English

design and handicraft his memory will always be held in honour.

His death marked an epoch both in art and in social and economic

thought. The press notices and appreciations that have appeared from

time to time for the most part have dwelt upon his work as a poet

and an artist and craftsman, and have but lightly passed over his

connection with Socialism and advanced thought.

But, even apart from prejudice, a hundred will note the beauty and

splendour of the flower to one who will notice the leaf and the stem,

or the roots and the soil from which the tree springs.

Yet the greatness of a man must be measured by the number of spheres

in which he is distinguished--the width of his range and appeal to his

fellows.

In the different branches of his work William Morris commanded the

admiration, or, what is equally a tribute to his force, excited the

opposition--of as many different sections of specialists.

As a poet he appealed to poets by reason of many distinct qualities.

He united pre-Raphaelite vividness (as in "The Haystack in the

Floods"), with a dream-like, wistful sweetness and charm of flowing

narrative, woven in a kind of rich mediaeval tapestry of verse, and

steeped with the very essence of legendary romance as in "The Earthly

Paradise"; or with the heroic spirit of earlier time, as in "Sigurd

the Volsung," while all these qualities are combined in his later

prose romances.

His architectural and archaeological knowledge again was complete

enough for the architect and the antiquary.

His classical and historical lore won him the respect of scholars.

His equipment as a designer and craftsman, based upon his

architectural knowledge and training enabled him to exercise an

extraordinary influence over all the arts of design, and gave him his

place as leader of our latter-day English revival of handicraft--a

position perhaps in which he is widest known.

In all these capacities the strength and beauty of William Morris's

work has been freely acknowledged by his brother craftsmen, as well as

by a very large public.

There was, however, still another direction in which his vigour and

personal weight were thrown with all the ardour of an exceptionally

ardent nature, wherein the importance and significance of his work

is as yet but partially apprehended--I mean his work in the cause of

Socialism, in which he might severally be regarded as an economist, a

public lecturer, a propagandist, a controversialist.

No doubt many even of the most emphatic admirers of William Morris's

work as an artist, a poet, and a decorator have been unable to follow

him in this direction, while others have deplored, or even denounced,

his self-sacrificing enthusiasm. There seems to have been insuperable

difficulty to some minds in realizing that the man who wrote "The

Earthly Paradise" should have lent a hand to try to bring it about,

when once the new hope had dawned upon him.

There is no greater mistake than to think of William Morris as a

sentimentalist, who, having built himself a dream-house of art and

poetry, sighs over the turmoil of the world, and calls himself a

Socialist because factory chimneys obtrude themselves upon his view.

It seems to have escaped those who have inclined to such an opinion

that a man, in Emerson's phrase, "can only obey his own polarity." His

life must gravitate necessarily towards its centre. The accident that

he should have reached economics and politics through poetry and art,

so far from disqualifying a man to be heard, only establishes his

claim to bring a cultivated mind and imaginative force to bear upon

the hard facts of nature and science.

The practice of his art, his position as an employer of labour, his

intensely practical knowledge of certain handicrafts, all these things

brought him face to face with the great Labour question; and the fact

that he was an artist and a poet, a man of imagination and feeling as

well as intellect, gave him exceptional advantages in solving it--at

least theoretically. His practical nature and sincerity moved him to

join hands with men who offered a practical programme, or at least who

opened up possibilities of action towards bringing about a new social

system.

His own personal view of a society based upon an entire change of

economic system is most attractively and picturesquely described in

"News from Nowhere, some Chapters of a Utopian Romance." He called

it _Utopian_, but, in his view, and granting the conditions, it was a

perfectly practical Utopia. He even gave an account (through the mouth

of a survivor of the old order) of the probable course of events which

might lead up to such a change. The book was written as a sort of

counterblast to Edward Bellamy's "Looking Backward," which on its

appearance was very widely read on both sides of the water, and

there seemed at the time some danger of the picture there given of a

socialized state being accepted as the only possible one. It may be

partly answerable for an impression in some quarters that a Socialist

system must necessarily be mechanical. But the society described in

"Looking Backward" is, after all, only a little more developed along

the present lines of American social life--a sublimation of the

universal supply of average citizen wants by mechanical means, with

the mainspring of the machine altered from individual profit to

collective interest. This book, most ingeniously thought out as it

was, did its work, no doubt, and appealed with remarkable force to

minds of a certain construction and bias, and it is only just to

Bellamy to say that he claimed no finality for it.

But "News from Nowhere" may be considered--apart from the underlying

principle, common to both, of the collective welfare as the

determining constructive factor of the social system--as its complete

antithesis.

According to Bellamy, it is apparently the _city_ life that is the

only one likely to be worth anything, and it is to the organization

of production and distribution of things contributing to the supposed

necessities and comforts of inhabitants of cities that the reader's

thoughts are directed.

With Morris the country life is obviously the most important, the

ideal life. Groups of houses, not too large to be neighbourly, each

with a common guest-hall, with large proportions of gardens and

woodland, take the place of crowded towns. Thus London, as we know it,

disappears.

What is this but building upon the ascertained scientific facts of

our day, that the inhabitants of large cities tend to deteriorate in

physique, and would die out were it not for the constant infusion of

new blood from the country districts?

Work is still a hard necessity in "Looking Backward," a thing to

be got rid of as soon as possible, so citizens, after serving

the community as clerks, waiters, or what not, until the age of

forty-five, are exempt.

With Morris, work gives the zest to life, and all labour has its own

touch of art--even the dustman can indulge in it in the form of rich

embroidery upon his coat. The bogey of labour is thus routed by its

own pleasurable exercise, with ample leisure, and delight in external

beauty in both art and nature.

As regards the woman's question, it never, in his Utopia, appears to

be asked. He evidently himself thought that with the disappearance of

the commercial competitive struggle for existence and what he termed

"artificial famine" caused by monopoly of the means of existence, the

claim of women to compete with men in the scramble for a living would

not exist. There would be no necessity for either men or women to sell

themselves, since in a truly co-operative commonwealth each one would

find some congenial sphere of work.

In fact, as Morris once said, "settle the economic question and you

settle all other questions. It is the Aaron's rod which swallows up

the rest."

I gather that while he thought both men and women should be

economically free, and therefore socially and politically free, and

free to choose their occupation, he by no means wished to ignore or

obliterate sex distinctions, and all those subtle and fine feelings

which arise from it, which really form the warp and weft of the

courtesies and relationships of life.

Now, whatever criticisms might be offered, or whatever objections

might be raised, such a conception of a possible social order, such

a view of life upon a new economic basis as is painted in this

delightful book, is surely, before all things, remarkably wholesome,

human, and sane, and pleasurable. If wholesome, human, sane, and

pleasurable lives are not possible to the greater part of humanity

under existing institutions, so much the worse for those institutions.

Humanity has generally proved itself better than its institutions,

and man is chiefly distinguished above other animals by his power to

modify his conditions. Life, at least, means growth and change, and

human evolution shows us a gradual progression--a gradual triumph

of higher organization and intelligence over lower, checked by

the inexorable action of natural laws, which demand reparation

for breaches of moral and social law, and continually probe the

foundations of society. Man has become what he is through his capacity

for co-operative social action. The particular forms of social

organization are the crystallization of this capacity. They are but

shells to be cast away when they retard growth or progress, and it is

then that the living organism, collective or individual, seeks out or

slowly forms a new home.

As to the construction and colour of such a new house for reorganized

society and regenerated life, William Morris has left us in no doubt

as to his own ideas and ideals. It may seem strange that a man who

might be said to have been steeped in mediaeval lore,[1] and whose

delight seemed to be in a beautifully imagined world of romance

peopled with heroic figures, should yet be able to turn from that

dream world with a clear and penetrating gaze upon the movements of

his own time, and to have thrown himself with all the strength of

his nature into the seething social and industrial battle of modern

England. That the "idle singer of an empty day" should voice the

claims and hopes of Labour, stand up for the rights of free speech

in Trafalgar Square, and speak from a wagon in Hyde Park, may have

surprised those who only knew him upon one side, but to those who

fully apprehended the reality, ardour, and sincerity of his nature,

such action was but its logical outcome and complement, and assuredly

it redounds to the honour of the artist, the scholar, and the poet

whose loss we still feel, that he was also a man.

Few men seemed to drink so full a measure of life as William Morris,

and, indeed, he frankly admitted in his last days that he _had_

enjoyed his life. I have heard him say that he only knew what it was

to be alive. He could not conceive of death, and the thought of it did

not trouble him.

[Illustration: William Morris speaking from a wagon in Hyde Park,

May 1 1894]

I first met William Morris in 1870, at a dinner at the house of

the late Earl of Carlisle, a man of keen artistic sympathies and

considerable artistic ability, notably in water-colour landscapes. He

was an enthusiast for the work of Morris and Burne-Jones, and had just

built his house at Palace Green from the designs of Mr. Philip Webb,

and Morris and Company had decorated it. Morris, I remember, had just

returned from a visit to Iceland, and could hardly talk of anything

else. It seemed to have laid so strong a hold upon his imagination;

and no doubt its literary fruits were the translations of the

Icelandic sagas he produced with Professor Magnússon, and also the

heroic poem of "Sigurd the Volsung." He never, indeed, seemed to lose

the impressions of that Icelandic visit, and was ever ready to talk of

his experiences there--the primitive life of the people, the long pony

rides, the strange, stony deserts, the remote mountains, the

geysers and the suggestions of volcanic force everywhere, and the

romance-haunted coasts.

I well remember, too, the impression produced by the first volume of

"The Earthly Paradise," which had appeared, I think, shortly before

the time of which I speak: the rich and fluent verse, with its simple,

direct, Old World diction; the distinct vision, the romantic charm,

the sense of external beauty everywhere, with a touch of wistfulness.

The voice was the voice of a poet, but the eye was the eye of an

artist and a craftsman.

It was not so long before that the fame began to spread of the little

brotherhood of artists who gathered together at the Red House, Bexley

Heath, built by Mr. Philip Webb, it was said, in an orchard without

cutting down a single tree. Dante Gabriel Rossetti was the centre of

the group, the leading spirit, and he had absorbed the spirit of the

pre-Raphaelite movement and centralized it both in painting and verse.

But others co-operated at first, such as his master, Ford Madox Brown,

and Mr. Arthur Hughes, until the committee of artists narrowed down,

and became a firm, establishing workshops in one of the old-fashioned

houses on the east side of Queen Square, Bloomsbury, a retired place,

closed by a garden to through traffic at the northern end. Here

Messrs. Morris, Marshall, Faulkner and Co. (which included a very

notable man, Mr. Philip Webb, the architect) began their practical

protest against prevailing modes and methods of domestic decoration

and furniture, which had fallen since the great exhibition of 1851

chiefly under the influence of the Second Empire taste in upholstery,

which was the antithesis of the new English movement. This latter

represented in the main a revival of the mediaeval spirit (not the

letter) in design; a return to simplicity, to sincerity; to good

materials and sound workmanship; to rich and suggestive surface

decoration, and simple constructive forms.

[Illustration: DESIGN FOR WALL-PAPER. "THE DAISY."]

The simple, black-framed, old English Buckinghamshire elbow-chair,

with its rush-bottomed seat, was substituted for the wavy-backed and

curly-legged stuffed chair of the period, with its French polish and

concealed, and often very unreliable, construction. Bordered Eastern

rugs, and fringed Axminster carpets, on plain or stained boards, or

India matting, took the place of the stuffy planned carpet; rich,

or simple, flat patterns acknowledged the wall, and expressed the

proportions of the room, instead of trying to hide both under bunches

of sketchy roses and vertical stripes; while, instead of the big

plate-glass mirror, with ormolu frame, which had long reigned over the

cold white marble mantel-piece, small bevelled glasses were inserted

in the panelling of the high wood mantel-shelf, or hung over it in

convex circular form. Slender black wood or light brass curtain rods,

and curtains to match the coverings, or carry out the colour of the

room, displaced the heavy mahogany and ormolu battering-rams,

with their fringed and festooned upholstery, which had hitherto

overshadowed the window of the so-called comfortable classes. Plain

white or green paint for interior wood-work drove graining and

marbling to the public-house; blue and white Nankin, Delft, or Grès

de Flandres routed Dresden and Sèvres from the cabinet; plain

oaken boards and trestles were preferred before the heavy mahogany

telescopic British dining-table of the mid-nineteenth century; and

the deep, high-backed, canopied settle with loose cushions ousted the

castored and padded couch from the fireside.

[Illustration: DESIGN FOR WALL-PAPER. "ROSE TRELLIS."]

Such were the principal ways, as to outward form, in which the new

artistic movement made itself felt in domestic decoration. Beginning

with the houses of a comparatively limited circle, mostly artists,

the taste rapidly spread, and in a few years Morrisian patterns and

furniture became the vogue. Cheap imitation on all sides set in, and

commercial and fantastic persons, perceiving the set of the current,

floated themselves upon it, tricked themselves out like jackdaws with

peacocks' feathers, and called it "the aesthetic movement." The usual

excesses were indulged in by excitable persons, and the inner meaning

of the movement was temporarily lost sight of under a cloud of

travesty and ridicule, until, like a shuttlecock, the idea had been

sufficiently played with and tossed about by society and the big

public, it was thrown aside, like a child's toy, for some new

catch-word. These things were, however, but the ripples or falling

leaves upon the surface of the stream, and had but little to do with

its sources or its depth, though they might serve as indications of

the strength of the current.

The art of Morris and those associated with him was really but the

outward and visible sign of a great movement of protest and reaction

against the commercial and conventional conceptions and standards of

life and art which had obtained so strong a hold in the industrial

nineteenth century.

Essentially Gothic and romantic and free in spirit as opposed to the

authoritative and classical, its leader was emphatically and even

passionately Gothic in his conception of art and ideals of life.

The inspiration of his poetry was no less mediaeval than the spirit

of his designs, and it was united with a strong love of nature and an

ardent love of beauty.

[Illustration: WOOLLEN HANGING. "THE PEACOCK."]

One knows but little of William Morris's progenitors. His name

suggests Welsh origin, though his birthplace was Walthamstow. Born

24th March 1834, one of a well-to-do family, it was a fortunate

circumstance that he was never cramped by poverty in the development

of his aims. Escaping the ecclesiastical influence of Oxford and

a Church career, his prophets being rather John Ruskin and Thomas

Carlyle, he approached the study and practice of art from the

architectural side under one of our principal English Gothic

revivalists, George Edmund Street, although he at one time entertained

the idea of becoming a painter, and the very interesting picture of

"Guinevere" which was shown at one of the Arts and Crafts Exhibitions

makes one regret he did not do more in this way. Few men had a better

understanding of the nature of Gothic architecture, and a wider

knowledge of the historic buildings of his own country, than William

Morris, and there can be no doubt that this grasp of the true root

and stem of the art was of enormous advantage when he came to turn his

attention to the various subsidiary arts and handicrafts comprehended

under decorative design. The thoroughness of his methods of work and

workmanlike practicality were no less remarkable than his amazing

energy and capacity for work.

[Illustration: DESIGN FOR SILK HANGING.]

In one of his earlier papers he said that it appeared to be the object

with most people to get rid of, or out of, the necessity of work,

but for his part he only wanted to find time for more work, or (as it

might be put) to live in order to work, rather than to work in order

to live.

While as a decorative designer he was, of course, interested in _all_

methods, materials, and artistic expression, he concentrated himself

generally upon one particular kind at a time, as in the course of

his study and practice he mastered the difficulties and technical

conditions of each.

At one time it was dyeing, upon which he held strong views as to the

superiority, permanency, and beauty of vegetable dyes over the mineral

and aniline dyes, so much used in ordinary commerce, and his practice

in this craft, and the charm of his tints, did much to check the taste

for the vivid but fugitive colours of coal-tar.

His way was to tackle the thing with his own hands, and so he worked

at the vat, like the practical man that he was in these matters. An

old friend tells the story of his calling at the works one day and, on

inquiring for the master, hearing a strong, cheery voice call out

from some inner den, "I'm dyeing, I'm dyeing, I'm dyeing!" and the

well-known robust figure of the craftsman presently appeared in his

blue shirt-sleeves, his hands stained blue from the vat where he had

been at work.

[Illustration: COTTON PRINT. "EVENLODE."]

At another time it was weaving that absorbed him, and the study

of dyeing naturally led him to textiles, and, indeed, was probably

undertaken with the view of reviving their manufacture in new forms,

and from rugs and carpets he conceived the idea of reviving Arras

tapestry. I remember the man who claimed to have taught Morris to

work on the high-warp loom. His name was Wentworth Buller. He was an

enthusiast for Persian art, and he had travelled in that country

and found out the secret of the weaving of the fine Persian carpets,

discovering, I believe, that they were made of goats' hair. He made

some attempt to revive this method in England, but from one cause or

another was not successful. William Morris, when he had learned the

craft of tapestry weaving himself, set about teaching others, and

trained two youths, one of whom (Mr. Dearle) is now chief at the

Merton Abbey Works, who became exceedingly skilful at the work,

executing the large and elaborate design of Sir Edward Burne-Jones

(_The Adoration of the Magi_), which was first worked for the chapel

of his own and Morris's college (Exeter College) at Oxford.

In this tapestry, as was his wont, Morris enriched the design with

a foreground of flowers, through which the Magi approach with their

gifts the group of the Virgin and Child, with St. Joseph.

In fact, the designs of William Morris are so associated with and

so often form part of the work of others or only appear in some

conditioned material form, that little or no idea of his individual

work, or of his wide influence, could be gathered from any existing

autograph work of his. That he was a facile designer of floral

ornament his numerous beautiful wall-papers and textile hangings

prove, but he always considered that the finished and final form of a

particular design, complete in the material for which it was intended,

was the only one to be looked at, and always objected to showing

preliminary sketches and working drawings. He was a keen judge and

examiner of work, and fastidious, and as he did not mind taking

trouble himself he expected it from those who worked for him. His

artistic influence was really due to the way he supervised work under

his control, carried out by many different craftsmen under his eye,

and not so much by his own actual handiwork.

In any estimate of William Morris's power and influence as an artist,

this should always be borne in mind. He always described himself as

an artist working with assistants, which is distinct from the

manufacturer who simply directs a business from the business point

of view. Nothing went out of the works at Queen Square, or, later, at

Merton Abbey, without his sanction from the artistic point of view.

[Illustration: KELMSCOTT HOUSE. MEETING ROOM OF THE HAMMERSMITH

SOCIALIST SOCIETY.]

The wave of taste which he had done so much to create certainly

brought prosperity to the firm, and larger premises had to be taken;

so Morris and Company emerged from the seclusion of Queen Square and

opened a large shop in Oxford Street, and set up extensive works at

Merton Abbey--a most charming and picturesque group of workshops,

surrounded by trees and kitchen gardens, on the banks of the river

Wandle in Surrey, not far from Wimbledon. The tapestry and carpet

looms which were first set up at Kelmscott House, on the Upper Mall

at Hammersmith,[2] were moved to Merton, where also the dyeing and

painted glass-work were carried on.

This latter art had long been an important part of the work of the

firm. In early days designs were supplied by Ford Madox Brown and D.

G. Rossetti, but later they were entirely from the hands of Morris's

closest friend, Edward Burne-Jones; that is to say, the figure-work.

Floral and subsidiary design were frequently added by William

Morris, as was also the leading of the cartoons. The results of their

co-operation in this way have been the many fine windows scattered

over the land, chiefly at Oxford and Cambridge, where the Christ

Church window and those at Jesus College may be named, while the

churches of Birmingham have been enriched by many splendid examples,

more particularly at St. Philip's. Their glass has also found place in

the United States, in Richardson's famous church at Boston, and at the

late Miss Catherine Wolfe's house, Vinland, Newport.

An exquisite autograph work of William Morris's is the copy of "The

Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyám," which he wrote out and illuminated with

his own hand, though even to this work Burne-Jones contributed a

miniature, and Mr. Fairfax Murray worked out other designs in some of

the borders. This beautiful work was exhibited at the first Arts

and Crafts Exhibition in 1888. It is in the possession of Lady

Burne-Jones, and by her special permission I am enabled to give some

reproductions of four of the pages here.

It is so beautiful that one wonders the artist was not induced to do

more work of the kind; but there is only known to be one or two

other manuscripts partially completed by him. Certainly his love for

mediaeval illuminated MSS. was intense and his knowledge great, and

his collection of choice and rare works of this kind probably unique.

The same might be said of his collection of early printed books, which

was wonderfully rich with wood-cuts of the best time and from the most

notable presses of Germany, Flanders, Italy, and France.

[Illustration:

8 OMAR KHAYYAM

Alike for those who for today prepare

And those that after a tomorrow stare

A muezzin from the Tower of Darkness cries

Fools, your reward is neither here nor there

25

Why, all the saints and sages who discussed

Of the Two Worlds so learnedly, are thrust

Like foolish prophets forth, their words to scorn

Are scattered, and their mouths are stopt with dust

26

O come with old Khayyam, and leave the wise

To talk; one thing is certain, that Life flies;

One thing is certain, and the rest is lies

The flower that once has blown for ever dies

27

Myself when young did eagerly frequent

Doctor and saint, and heard great argument

FROM MORRIS'S MS. OF OMAR KHAYYÁM.]

[Illustration:

About it and about, and evermore

Came out by the same door as in I went.

28

With them the seed of Wisdom did I sow,

And with my own hand laboured it to grow:

And this was all the harvest that I reaped--

I came like water, and like wind I go.

29

Into this Universe, and why not knowing

Nor whence, like water willy-nilly flowing

And out of it as wind along the waste

I know not whither, willy-nilly blowing

30

What without asking hither hurried whence

And without asking whither hurried hence

Another, and another cup to drown

The memory of this impertinence!

FROM MORRIS'S MS. OF OMAR KHAYYÁM.]

[Illustration:

My thread-bare penitence apieces tore.

71

And much as wine has played the infidel,

And robbed me of my robe of honour--well,

I often wonder what the vintners buy

One half so precious as the goods they sell.

72

Alas, that Spring should vanish with the rose,

That Youth's sweet-scented manuscript should close

The Nightingale that in the branches sang,

Ah whence, and whither flown again, who knows!

73

Ah, Love! could thou and I with Fate conspire

To grasp this sorry scheme of things entire,

Would we not shatter it to bits, and then

Remould it nearer to the heart's desire?

FROM MORRIS'S MS. OF OMAR KHAYYÁM.]

[Illustration:

Ah Moon of my delight who knowest no wane,

The Moon of Heaven is rising once again;

How oft hereafter rising shall she look

Through this same garden after me--in vain.

75

And when Thyself with shining foot shall pass

Among the guests star-scattered on the grass,

And in thy joyous errand reach the spot

Where I made one--turn down an empty glass!

TAMAM SHUD

FROM MORRIS'S MS. OF OMAR KHAYYÁM.]

This brings us to William Morris's next and, as it proved, last

development in art--the revival of the craft of the printer, and its

pursuit as an art.

I recall the time when the project was first discussed. It was in

the autumn of 1889. It was the year of an Art Congress at Edinburgh,

following the initial one at Liverpool the preceding year, held under

the auspices of the National Association for the Advancement of Art.

Some of us afterwards went over to Glasgow to lecture; and a small

group, of which Morris was one, found themselves at the Central

Station Hotel together. It was here that William Morris spoke of his

new scheme, his mind being evidently centred upon it. Mr. Emery

Walker (who has supplied me with the photographs which illustrate this

article) was there, and he became his constant and faithful helper in

all the technicalities of the printer's craft; Mr. Cobden-Sanderson

also was of the party; he may be said to have introduced a new epoch

in book-binding, and his name was often associated with Morris as

binder of some of his books.

Morris took up the craft of printing with characteristic thoroughness.

He began at the beginning and went into the paper question, informing

himself as to the best materials and methods, and learning to make a

sheet of paper himself. The Kelmscott Press paper is made by hand, of

fine white linen rags only, and is not touched with chemicals. It has

the toughness and something of the quality of fine Whatman or O.W.

drawing-paper.

When he set to work to design his types he obtained enlarged

photographs of some of the finest specimens of both Gothic and Roman

type from the books of the early printers, chiefly of Bale and Venice.

He studied and compared these, and as the result of his analysis

designed two or three different kinds of type for his press, beginning

with the "Golden" type, which might be described as Roman type under

Gothic influence, and developing the more frankly Gothic forms known

as the "Troy" and the "Chaucer" types. He also used Roman capitals

founded upon the best forms of the early Italian printers.

Morris was wont to say that he considered the glory of the Roman

alphabet was in its capitals, but the glory of the Gothic alphabet was

in its lower-case letters.

He was asked why he did not use types after the style of the lettering

in some of his title-pages, but he said this would not be reasonable,

as the lettering of the titles was specially designed to fit into the

given spaces, and could not be used as movable type.

The initial letters are Gothic in feeling, and form agreeably bold

quantities in black and white in relation to the close and rich matter

of the type, which is still further relieved occasionally by floral

sprays in bold open line upon the inner margins, while when woodcut

pictures are used they were led up to by rich borderings.

The margins of the title and opening chapter which faced it are

occupied by richly designed broad borders of floral arabesques upon

black grounds, the lettering of the title forming an essential part of

the ornamental effect, and often placed upon a mat or net of lighter,

more open arabesque, in contrast to the heavy quantities of the solid

border.

The Kelmscott Chaucer is the monumental work of Morris's Press,

and the border designs, made specially for this volume, surpass

in richness and sumptuousness all his others, and fitly frame the

woodcuts after the designs of Sir Edward Burne-Jones.

The arabesque borders and initial letters of the Kelmscott books were

all drawn by Morris himself, the engraving on wood was mostly done

by Mr. W. H. Hooper--almost the only first-rate facsimile engraver

on wood left--and a good artist and craftsman besides. Mr. Arthur

Leverett engraved the designs to the "The Glittering Plain," which

were my contribution to the Kelmscott Press, but I believe Mr. Hooper

did all the other work, while Mr. Fairfax Murray and Mr. Catteson

Smith drafted the Burne-Jones designs upon the wood.

It was not, perhaps, generally known, at least before the appearance

of Miss May Morris's fine edition of her father's works, published

by Messrs. Longman, that many years before the Kelmscott Press was

thought of an illustrated edition of "The Earthly Paradise" was in

contemplation, and not only were many designs made by Burne-Jones, but

a set of them was actually engraved by Morris himself upon wood for

the "Cupid and Psyche," though they were never issued to the public.

I have spoken of the movement in art represented by William Morris

and his colleagues as really part of a great movement of protest--a

crusade against the purely commercial, industrial, and material

tendencies of the day.

This protest culminated with William Morris when he espoused the cause

of Socialism.

Now some have tried to minimize the Socialism of William Morris, but

it was, in the circumstances of his time, the logical and natural

outcome of his ideas and opinions, and is in direct relation with his

artistic theories and practice.

For a thorough understanding of the conditions of modern manufacture

and industrial production, of the ordinary influences which govern the

producers of marketable commodities, of wares offered in the name of

art, of the condition of worker, and the pressure of competition, he

was in a particularly advantageous position.

So far from being a sentimentalist who was content melodiously and

pensively to regret that things were not otherwise, he was driven by

contact with the life around him to his economic conclusions. As he

said himself, it was art led him to Socialism, not economics, though

he confirmed his convictions by economic study.

As an artist, no doubt at first he saw the uglification of the world

going on, and the vast industrial and commercial machine grinding the

joy and the leisure out of human life as regarded the great mass of

humanity. But as an employer he was brought into direct relation with

the worker as well as the market and the public, and he became fully

convinced that the modern system of production for profit and the

world-market, however inevitable as a stage in economic and social

evolution, was not only most detrimental to a healthy and spontaneous

development of art and to conditions of labour, but that it would be

bound, ultimately, by the natural working of economic laws, to devour

itself.

Never cramped by poverty in his experiments and in his endeavours

to realize his ideals, singularly favoured by fortune in all his

undertakings, he could have had no personal reasons on these scores

for protesting against the economic and social tendencies and

characteristics of his own time. He hated what is called modern

civilization and all its works from the first, with a whole heart, and

made no secret of it. For all that, he was a shrewd and keen man in

his dealings with the world. If he set its fashions and habits at

defiance, and persisted in producing his work to please himself, it

was not his fault that his countrymen eagerly sought them and paid

lavishly for their possession. A common reproach hurled at Morris has

been that he produced costly works for the rich while he professed

Socialism. This kind of thing, however, it may be remarked, is not

said by those friendly to Socialism, or anxious for the consistency of

its advocates--quite the contrary. Such objectors appear to ignore,

or to be ignorant of, the fact that according to the quality of the

production must be its cost; and that the cheapness of the cheapest

things of modern manufacture is generally at the cost of the

cheapening of human labour and life, which is a costly kind of

cheapness after all.

If anyone cares for good work, a good price must be paid. Under

existing conditions possession of such work is only possible to those

who can pay the price, but this seems to work out rather as part of an

indictment against the present system of production, which Socialists

wish to alter.

If a wealthy man were to divest himself of his property and distribute

it, he would not bring Socialism any nearer, and his self-sacrifice

would hardly benefit the poor at large (except, perhaps, a few

individuals), but under the working of the present system his wealth

would ultimately enrich the rich--would gravitate to those who _had_,

and not to those who _had not_. The object of Socialism is to win

justice, not charity.

William Morris to Whistler Papers and addresses on art and craft and the commonweal. · 第 1 / 12 段