“The Parish of Whaplode, prior to the Conquest, was under the

jurisdiction of the convent of Croyland, the abbot of which,

from the earliest times, was lord of the principal manor. It

was proved at a trial before the Bishop of Lincoln in 1447,

the abbot “held the principal demesne rights in Whaplode, and

had there besides the fee of the church markets, fairs, wastes

and warren, right of pillory, as also the assize of bread and

beer,” though it is recorded that the abbot’s rights were

disputed, and that Ralph Mershe (abbot from 1253-1281), at

great expense, and after long suits at law, gained the manor

of Gedney and the _church_ at Whaplode. This seems strange,

as every record from the earliest times connects the abbot of

Croyland with the patronage of Whaplode Church, and that the

convent used to supply chaplains to do duty. In addition to the

Croyland records, there are the public records, for we find

that the abbot, in Henry III.’s reign, in 1245, had a grant

of a weekly market on Saturday, and a fair on the Assumption

of the Blessed Virgin and six days afterwards, and that this

grant was confirmed by Edward I.; besides which we have the

ecclesiastical documents in the Bishop’s Register at Lincoln,

showing that the abbot presented to the church in 1239, 1246,

1250, 1251. The abbot won the day, and Croyland abbots held the

presentation to the living until the Dissolution in the reign

of Henry VIII.”

[Illustration: MOULTON CHURCH SOUTH AISLE, LOOKING NORTH-WEST.

MOULTON CHURCH NAVE, LOOKING EAST.]

The monks of Croyland were the builders of Whaplode’s two churches,

though doubtless largely aided by the laity, as we have seen was the case

at Moulton. Unfortunately the records of Croyland do not give the same

amount of information in reference to the building of their churches as

do those of Spalding Priory in reference to theirs.

There is no trace of the building of any earlier church at Whaplode than

the present one, and we are unaware of any remains of earlier work being

found when the church was restored, about the middle of last century.

The earliest part of the present church is the chancel arch and the four

eastmost compartments of the nave, which were built about 1125, in the

Norman style of architecture. It is greatly to the credit of King William

I. and the invaders and their descendants, that no sooner had they got

this island into a settled state than they began building cathedrals,

monasteries, and parish churches all over the kingdom. Croyland was the

first to inaugurate the church-building move in this district, and if

they had completed the church as evidently originally designed by the

Norman architect, it would have been a very fine specimen of the period.

Before the work was resumed at Whaplode, in the Transitional Period,

the masons had been busy at work on the present churches of Moulton and

Sutton St. Mary. The monks of Croyland, about forty or fifty years after

they had built the Norman portion of the nave, erected the westernmost

portion in the Transitional style (1145-1190), and which made the nave

110 feet long and 19 feet wide, the longest and narrowest nave in the

Elloc division of Lincolnshire.

The Norman chancel arch is only 13 feet wide and very low, which gives

the east end of the nave a very heavy appearance.

The smallness of the Norman arch seems to have claimed the attention of

the architects at a very early date. They cut away the large semicircular

shafts which carried the soffit of the arch and worked in a Transitional

corbel to make the opening wider.

One cannot but think that the Norman columns of the nave were intended to

carry a far heavier structure than was ever placed on them, and that the

architects altered their plans even before the arches had been erected.

The clerestory is partly Norman, and the rest, with the west front,

Transitional.

The west front has been terribly mutilated, but happily sufficient

remains to guide the architect to its perfect restoration; fortunately

it has not been so badly ill-treated as the chancel, which is a standing

disgrace, and is as bad a form of Churchwarden’s style as can well be

conceived. There is even here, however, enough of the original work left

to guide the architect in its restoration, if only funds were forthcoming

from the rectors, who are trustees of a public school.

One regrets it is not possible in an article of this nature to enter into

the details of the Norman-Transitional work at Whaplode, or compare it

with the work of the same period in the churches at Sutton St. Mary and

Moulton. To the student a visit to the three churches is very instructive.

As at Moulton Church, where the tower with its spire wins the admiration

of all visitors, so does the tower of Whaplode. It is curiously placed,

and with what object one is at a loss to understand.

Mr. Sharpe, writing on the tower, states—

“The very striking south-west tower, standing in an unusual

position on the south side of the eastmost compartment of the

south aisle, must have been commenced immediately after the

completion of the nave. In its four stages in height, of which

the three lowest belong to the original design, though carried

out in a manner which leads us to conclude that the first

stage, which carries a zigzag in its pointed arcade, was the

only one completed before the close of the Transitional Period,

the arcades of the two upper stages exhibiting an almost pure

Lancet treatment in their details.

“The fourth stage, with its embattled parapet, added in the

Curvilinear Period, gives an appropriate finish to this elegant

design.”

Richard de Gravesend, Bishop of Lincoln, gave the following charter to

Croyland in the year 1268:—

“To all faithful Christians by whom this writing may be read,

Richard, by Divine permission Bishop of Lincoln, sendeth

health in the Lord. We will that you should by this present

writing know; that, whereas our beloved children in Christ,

the religious persons, the Abbot and Convent of Croyland, have

long since obtained the grateful consent and assent of our

predecessor, the blessed Hugh, of famous and revered memory, as

also of his Holiness Honorius, some time chief bishop of the

Roman Church, likewise confirming the same of the church of

Whaplode, whereof they were and are the patrons, to have it to

their own proper use in manner as in this instrument is more

fully contained.

“We, at their devout and frequent petitions that we would

favourably, more graciously in the premises, grant them our

assent and consent to the permission and favour done them by

our said predecessor, the consideration of their order inducing

thereto, having due regard to the special devotion of the said

religious persons, and their sincere love in the Lord towards

our venerable church at Lincoln, and the Bishop thereof, being

more readily inclined to grant their petitions and requests,

as therefore in the monastery of Croyland the weightiness of

religion and observance of their order for the sake of sanctity

and principally in favour of hospitality, which are known to

flourish in that monastery, and which do and ought to render

it esteemed by all men, remembering that favour should not

be denied to such requesting it, of the assent and grateful

consent concerning of our beloved children in Christ of William

Lessington, in respect of Divine Piety, and especially for

enlarging the duty of Divine worship therein, have given,

granted, and by this our present Charter have confirmed, to

the monastery of Croyland, and to the monks there together

serving God, the church of Quaplode (Whaplode), in which they

obtain the right of patronage, to be possessed to and for

their own proper uses for ever, the rent and profits of which

church they may indeed convert to their use, and without any

impediment; for the future have power lawfully so to convert

the same, a competent portion thereof being still reserved

for the vicar perpetually serving the same church, wherein we

likewise ordain and establish the Vicarage out of the profits

of the said church for the support of him and his ministers,

and the charges thereof as we have thought fit by our episcopal

authority, thus to distinguish the portions of the said abbot

and convent and the vicar before mentioned by them to us and

our successors to be presented whenever the said vicarage shall

happen to be vacant, that they, the said abbot and convent, may

have the whole tithe of sheaves of the said church of Whaplode,

with all demesne lands, and its rights and appendants to the

said church any way belonging, and all the tithe of flax and

hemp purely and absolutely. Moreover, that they may have and

quietly take or receive the whole tithe of wool and lambs

arising from the whole parish (to wit) as consisting in fleeces

of wool and bodies of lambs, but that the vicar for the time

being successively to us and our successor to be presented by

the said abbot and convent to the vicarage aforesaid shall,

by reason thereof, by this our ordinances for ever hereafter

take and have the whole altarage absolutely and indisputably,

in whatever name conceived, and in whatsoever it doth and may

consist. The tithes of sheaves, flax, hemp, wool, and lambs,

and also the whole demesne land with its rights and appendants,

as is before said (only excepted), the said vicar shall have

and take the whole tithe of hay of the whole parish entirely

and without any diminution, and without impediments of the said

abbot and convent. He shall, moreover, have the redemption of

wool and of lambs wheresoever in the parish from the number

of five and so counting downwards, to wit where according to

the custom of the place to the tenth of the fleeces and of the

lambs it cannot by any means amount to every kind of tithe as

well as of wool as of lambs beyond the number of five, arising

by counting upwards to the aforesaid custom, remaining wholly

in the power of the before-named abbot and convent, as is

before mentioned.

“Whereupon we strictly forbid any deceit or fraud to be by any

one done under pain of the greater sentence; but we ordain

that the before-named abbot and convent do provide for the

Vicars for the place and time successively to be instituted a

competent mansion in a convenient place at first by them the

said abbot and convent, to be erected and competently built for

the first Vicar who shall be instituted next after the cession

or decease of Simon, now Vicar of the church of Whaplode,

thenceforward to be repaired or new built on the same spot as

by accidental cause, necessity, or age requiring it ought to be.

“We moreover ordain that the first and every Vicar by the

bishop to be instituted after the cession or decease of the

said Simon for the time being do sustain and allow ordinary

episcopal and archidiaconal charges due and accustomed, and

that they take care of and keep in repair and find books,

vestments, and other necessary ecclesiastical ornaments, and

repair the chancel of the church when it wants repairs at their

costs, and also provide and sustain all ministers necessary for

serving the vicarage before treated.

“Now we will and ordain that this our ordinance have force

for ever in all and singular the above said articles, saving

in all things the episcopal customs and dignity of the church

of Lincoln, that therefore full credit may be given to this

our present ordinance, and that a perpetual security may be

provided for the said abbot and convent and the vicars for the

time to come. We have caused this instrument to be corroborated

with the sanction of our seal. Done in the month of January

in the year of our Lord Christ’s incarnation 1268, and the

eleventh year of our consecration.”

The original Norman chancel was destroyed about the year 1320, when a new

chancel was built, of which little now remains, worked into the present

one, and one bay of the north wall, with a pillar, a part of the east-end

wall, and the jambs of the arch at the east end of the north aisle.

The Transitional aisles were taken down, and the present ones, with the

north transept, were erected about 1420. At the same time the clerestory

was heightened, and the present windows were inserted. Fortunately the

builders did not destroy the Transitional work.

When the wider aisles of Whaplode were erected, the builders, as at

Moulton, preserved the original Transitional south doorway and re-erected

it, and also the west doorway, which was erected in 1180, and is, with

the two doorways at Moulton, the oldest in the district.

The north and south porches are post-Reformation.

The roof of the nave, now being repaired, is a good example of the

Rectilinear Period.

The font is a creditable imitation of a Norman one, but is of

post-Reformation work.

The area of this church is so great that only the eastern portions of the

nave (the Norman portion) and aisles are fitted with open seats; the rest

of the church is entirely open, which gives it a cathedral appearance.

There is a fine seventeenth-century monument to Sir Antony Irby and his

wife, ancestors of the Right Hon. Lord Boston. There were formerly three

chapels in the church. Colonel Holles, when he visited the church about

1641, found memorials to the families of Fitzwalter, Littlebury, Rye,

Beke, Quaplod, Venables, Kyrketon, Haultoft, Walpole, Pulvertoft, Welby,

Ogle, and others.

ALL SAINTS’, HOLBEACH

Of this large and beautiful church little need be written. It is a

fine Curvilinear building, though merging into Rectilinear in the

tower and spire. It belongs to the latter part of the period, and is

the only church in the neighbourhood which is built in one style of

architecture. The work of erecting the edifice was practically continuous

from beginning to finish. It was built in the reigns of Edward III. and

Richard II., probably between 1340 and 1380.

The present church is not the first church at Holbeach—one would be

inclined to believe it was the third; the first would be a small Saxon

church, and the second a small Norman one, but a more substantial

structure than the first.

With regard to the earlier church or churches at Holbeach, we have

considerable documentary evidence, although we find few if any of their

remains in the present church, unless the Norman capital which lies on

the floor at the south-east corner of the nave, and some few of the very

numerous corbel heads at the terminations of the hood-moulds of the

clerestory windows, which are grotesque and rude enough to have been the

production of Norman workmen, formed parts of the earlier Norman church.

There is no mention of a church at Holbeach in the Domesday Survey, but

Pope Alexander in 1177 addressed a deed to Spalding Abbey confirming the

possessions of the Priory (in this district), and amongst them we find it

held “the Church of Holbeach with all pertaining unto it.”

Again, in 1189, we find Thomas de Multon, Lord of Holbeach, and others,

who conspired against the Abbot of Croyland, meeting in the Church of

Holbeach.

In 1194, on the morrow of the Holy Trinity, a settlement was arrived

at between Fulco d’Oiri, who claimed the advowson of the Church of All

Saints, Holbeach, and the Chapel of St. Peter in Holbeach; and he made

over the advowson to Conan, fil Elie de Holbeche, and his heirs for 21s.

rent in Holbeche, and for one “calcaria de aurata” (a pair of gilt spurs)

at Easter for all services.

The advowson of Holbeach, prior to the Bishop of Lincoln acquiring the

same, had belonged to the Multon family, a member of whom in King Henry

III.’s reign had a grant of a weekly market and also fairs at Holbeach.

The various legal suits brought to recover the advowson of Holbeach

are most interesting reading, and are given in Macdonald’s _History of

Holbeach_, a work well worth consulting.

In 1332, however, the church had a new patron—Henry, Bishop of Lincoln.

By deed dated at Stone, in the county of Northampton, “on the nearest

Wednesday after the feast of St. Martin,” the Bishop, in the sixth year

of the reign of Edward III. (1332), William de Harcourt, Knt., for the

sum of £500, made over to Henry, by divine permission Bishop of Lincoln,

the advowson of the Church of Holbeach; and in the Lincoln Register there

is a charter given in 1332 by William de Harcourt, Knight, appointing two

attorneys to put the Bishop in possession of Holbeach Church.

The Pope in 1334 despatched a papal bull to the Bishops of Hereford, Ely,

and Durham, directing that the Church of Holbeach, the patronage of which

the Bishop of Lincoln had lately acquired, should be appropriated to the

see of Lincoln.

On 5th February 1334, 7 Edward III. (dated at Nettleham), the Bishop of

Lincoln granted a charter to Dominus Thomas de ... appointing him his

(the Bishop’s) attorney to receive seisin of the Church at Holbeach.

In 1335 a licence was granted to William de Goseberkyrk, the newly

appointed Vicar of Holbeach, to hear confessions in reserved cases.

It appears that almost directly the Bishop of Lincoln obtained possession

of the advowson, and had placed his nominee into the vicarage, he at once

set about building the present church at Holbeach, which then excelled

the two neighbouring churches of Moulton and Whaplode. This doubtless led

the monks of Spalding and Croyland to enlarge their respective churches,

and rekindled the church-building energy of the twelfth and thirteenth

centuries.

The visitor will not fail to notice the north porch. In appearance it is

more in keeping for a baronial castle than a church porch. It is no part

of the original design or building, and was added years afterwards. It

was flanked at the north-east and south-east angles with massive circular

towers, one of which leads to the parvise above, and the other appears to

have been used as a cell or porter’s lodge.

Previously to being erected at Holbeach it had, we believe, formed part

of the manorial castle of the Multon family at Moulton. A mere glance

at the structure will show it was never designed for an ecclesiastical

building. It was probably removed from Moulton when the castle fell into

decay in the fifteenth century. The Multon family had died out for want

of males, and their property had been divided among co-heiresses.

The south porch and door are part of the original building; the door is a

beautiful example of the woodwork of the period. The font is also a good

example of the period.

The church has been well restored in recent years, and several painted

glass windows have been inserted. The work of restoration commenced when

the late Rev. Arthur Brook was the vicar, and has been continued in

the time of the present vicar, the Rev. Canon Hemmans. The church well

deserves a visit.

There is a fine altar tomb to the memory of Sir Humphrey Littlebury,

and when about the year 1640 Colonel Holles visited the church he

found armorial bearings and inscriptions to members of the families of

Littlebury, Kirketon, Calow, Welby, Leyke, and others.

There are chimes in the tower, erected in 1776 by Edward Arnold of St.

Neots, and a fine ring of eight bells.

ST. MARY MAGDALENE, FLEET

This church was built in the Curvilinear Period; it is chiefly notable

for its detached south-west tower with spire, which, though of no great

size, are well-proportioned and of good design. The spire is perfectly

plain. There are some well-carved corbel heads serving as supports to the

timbers of the roof.

This church has its origin from the laity, most probably from members of

the Multon family, who were lords of the manor, or from the Fitzwalters

and Haringtons, who divided the Multon family properties through marrying

the co-heiresses of that family.

The church has been wisely and well restored.

ST. MARY MAGDALENE’S, GEDNEY

This church, like Holbeach, is a beautiful fabric, and many think the

clerestory is the finest in the district. The history of the church is

written in stone—the tower gives it.

“Of the original building,” writes Mr. Sharpe, “nothing but the

lower part of the west tower now remains. It is not improbable,

however, that the pair of double lancet openings, now forming a

lower storey of the present cell chamber, was the belfry-stage

of the original tower; and that three different roofs, of

which the weatherings still remain on its east wall, have at

different times abutted against it. If this be so, the history

of this church and its three principal changes of form are

written on this wall. The first roof, the ridge of which was

below the sill of these lancet windows, covered a low church

of the Lancet or Transitional Period. The second roof was

that of the more pretentious Curvilinear nave, when the whole

church received a new character, a lofty ground storey and

spacious side aisles. The third roof, rising high up into these

lancet windows, marks the epoch when the handsome Rectilinear

clerestory was added and the tower raised another stage, in

preparation for a lofty spire that was never executed.”

In the Curvilinear Period the spacious chancel, with its large plain

three-light windows, was erected. The ground storey of the nave and the

side aisles were shortly afterwards built. The south doorway is of good

workmanship for a village church of this period. The twelve three-light

clerestory windows are of the Rectilinear Period, as are also the

battlemented parapet and pinnacles, also the upper storey of the tower.

The south porch and parvise are of this period, as is also the nave roof

and the small square-headed window—low side window in the south wall of

the chancel.

On the south door, which is a fine specimen of the period, is this

inscription—

PAX XTI SIT HUIC DOMUI ET

OMNIBUS HABITANTIBUS IN EA

HIC REQUIES NOSTRA.

The east window of the north aisle contains old stained glass. The church

is now undergoing restoration, but as there are some of the original

oaken open benches still in the church, the restorers should have no

difficulty in putting in suitable woodwork.

Dr. Stukeley, the Holbeach antiquary of the eighteenth century, states:

“This church was built by the abbots of Croyland, who had a stately house

on the north side of it and vast possessions in the parish. The upper

part of the tower is of the same date as the church, but built upon older

work; both were no doubt built by the abbots—assisted by charitable

donations. In the chancel window is a religious in his habits.”

In the account of Holbeach Church we saw how Fulko de Oiri in 1194 parted

with the advowson of Holbeach, and there is little doubt that he had the

advowson of the church at Gedney, though Croyland had a manor in that

parish.

As stated in the account of Whaplode Church (1253-1281), Ralph Mershe,

the Abbot of Croyland, at great expense and after long suits at law,

gained the _manor_ of Gedney and the church at Whaplode, but it does not

follow he had, at the time, the advowson of Gedney—on the contrary, the

following pedigrees from the Plea Roll of 7 Edw. III. and 8 Edw. III.

clearly show he had not:—

PLEA ROLLS (_De Banco_, Easter, 7 Edw. III.).

Lincoln—

James de Ros sues the Abbot of Croyland for the advowson of the

Church of Gedeneye (Gedney).

Falk de Oyry, _temp._ Henry III.

|

Emecina.

|

Giles de Gousille, 35 Henry III.

|

Peter.

|

Ralph.

|

Ralph.

|

Margaret = Philip le Despenser.

In the following year, in the suit in _Coram Rege_, Hilary, 8 Edw. III.:—

Lincoln—

The King sues James de Roos for the next presentation to the

Church of Gedeneye, which he claimed as guardian of Ralph de

Goushill.

Fulk D’Oyry, _temp._ Henry III.

|

Emytine.

|

Giles de Goushill, 35 Henry III.

|

Peter.

|

Ralph.

|

Ralph under age in charge of the King.

There is in the Lincoln Will Registry the will of a Philip Goushill of

Gedney, dated in the year 1401.

Eleanor de Clare, who was the granddaughter of Edward I. by his wife

Eleanor of Castile, married Ralph le Despenser, who was hung in 1326, and

their fourth son Philip, who died in 1313, married Margaret, daughter

and heiress of Ralph le Goushill; and when Colonel Holles visited Gedney

Church about 1640 he found the arms and monuments to the families of

Despensers, Roos, Clare, D’Oyry, Goushill, Welbys, and others.

Doubtless Stukeley is correct in stating the Curvilinear church of Gedney

was built under the direction and influence of Croyland, aided by the

laity; but one should be disposed to consider the earlier churches were

not built by the monks of Croyland. However, it is too long a subject to

discuss in this article.

SUTTON ST. MARY

Memorials of Old Lincolnshire · 第 8 / 29 段