I think there can be no criminal breach of Confidence in your taking a

Copy, if you will, of C[arlyle]'s Letter. Indeed, you are welcome to

keep it:--there was but one Person else I wished to show it to, and she

(a _She_) can do very well without it. I sent it to you directly I got

it, because I thought you would be as pleased as I was with C.'s encomium

on Spedding, which will console him (if he needs Consolation) for the

obduracy of the World at large, myself among the number. I can indeed

fully assent to Carlyle's Admiration of Spedding's History of the

_Times_, as well as of the Hero who lived in them. But the Question

still remains--was it worth forty years of such a Life as Spedding's to

write even so good an Account of a few, not the most critical, Years of

English History, and to leave Bacon (I think) a little less well off than

when S. began washing him: I mean in the eyes of candid and sensible men,

who simply supposed before that Bacon was no better than the Men of his

Time, and now J. S. has proved it. I have no doubt that Carlyle takes up

the Cudgels because he thinks the World is now going the other way. If

Spedding's Book had been praised by the Critics--Oh Lord!

But what a fine vigorous Letter from the old Man! When I was walking my

Garden yesterday at about 11 a.m. I thought to myself 'the Master will

have had this Letter at Breakfast; and a thought of it will cross him

tandis que le Predicateur de Ste Marie soit en plein Discours, etc.' . . .

If Lord Houghton be with you pray thank him for the first _ebauche_ of

Hyperion he sent me. Surely no one can doubt which was the first Sketch.

_To Miss Anna Biddell_.

12 MARINE TERRACE, LOWESTOFT.

_Jan._ 18/75.

DEAR MISS BIDDELL,

I am sending you a Treat. The old Athenaeum told me there was a Paper by

'Mr. Carlyle' in this month's Magazine; and never did I lay out half-a-

crown better. And you shall have the Benefit of it, if you will. Why,

Carlyle's Wine, so far from weak evaporation, is only grown better by

Age: losing some of its former fierceness, and grown mellow without

losing Strength. It seems to me that a Child might read and relish this

Paper, while it would puzzle any other Man to write such a one. I think

I must write to T. C. to felicitate him on this truly 'Green Old Age.'

Oh, it was good too to read it here, with the old Sea (which also has not

sunk into Decrepitude) rolling in from that North: and as I looked up

from the Book, there was a Norwegian Barque beating Southward, close to

the Shore, and nearly all Sail set. Read--Read! you will, you must, be

pleased; and write to tell me so.

This Place suits me, I think, at this time of year: there is Life about

me: and that old Sea is always talking to one, telling its ancient Story.

LOWESTOFT. _Febr._ 2/75.

DEAR MISS BIDDELL,

I am _so_ glad (as the Gushingtons say) that you like the Carlyle. I

have ordered the second Number and will send it to you when I have read

it. Some People, I believe, hesitate in their Belief of its being T. C.

or one of his School: I don't for a moment: if for no other reason than

that an Imitator always exaggerates his Model: whereas this Paper, we

see, _un_exaggerates the Master himself: as one would wish at his time of

Life. . . .

I ran over for one day to Woodbridge, to pay Bills, etc. But somehow I

was glad to get back here. The little lodging is more to my liking than

my own bigger rooms and staircases: and this cheerful Town better (at

this Season) than my yet barren Garden. One little Aconite however

looked up at me: Mr. Churchyard (in his elegant way) used to call them

'New Year's Gifts.'

_To E. B. Cowell_.

12 MARINE TERRACE, LOWESTOFT.

_Feb._ 2/75.

MY DEAR COWELL,

. . . I hope you have read, and liked, the Paper on the old Kings of

Norway in last Fraser. I bought it because the Athenaeum told me it was

Carlyle's; others said it was an Imitation of him: but his it must be, if

for no other reason than that the Imitator, you know, always exaggerates

his Master: whereas in this Paper Carlyle is softened down from his old

Self, mellowed like old Wine. Pray read, and tell me you think so too.

It is quite delightful, whoever did it. I was on the point of writing a

Line to tell him of my own delight: but have not done so. . . .

I have failed in another attempt at Gil Blas. I believe I see its easy

Grace, humour, etc. But it is (like La Fontaine) too thin a Wine for me:

all sparkling with little adventures, but no one to care about; no

Colour, no Breadth, like my dear Don; whom I shall resort to forthwith.

_To W. F. Pollock_.

LOWESTOFT, _Sept._ 22, [1878].

MY DEAR POLLOCK,

You will scarce thank me for a letter in pencil: perhaps you would thank

me less if I used the steel pen, which is my other resource. You could

very well dispense with a Letter altogether: and yet I believe it is

pleasant to get one when abroad.

I dare say I may have told you what Tennyson said of the Sistine Child,

which he then knew only by Engraving. He first thought the Expression of

his Face (as also the Attitude) almost too solemn, even for the Christ

within. But some time after, when A. T. was married, and had a Son, he

told me that Raffaelle was all right: that no Man's face was so solemn as

a Child's, full of Wonder. He said one morning that he watched his Babe

'worshipping the Sunbeam on the Bedpost and Curtain.' I risk telling you

this again for the sake of the Holy Ground you are now standing on.

Which reminds me also of a remark of Beranger's not out of place. He

says God forgot to give Raffaelle to Greece, and made a 'joli cadeau' of

him to the Church of Rome.

I brought here some Volumes of Lever's 'Cornelius O'Dowd' Essays, very

much better reading than Addison, I think. Also some of Sainte Beuve's

better than either. A sentence in O'Dowd reminded me of your Distrust of

Civil Service Examinations: 'You could not find a worse Pointer than the

Poodle which would pick you out all the letters of the Alphabet.' And is

not this pretty good of the World we live in? 'You ask me if I am going

to "_The Masquerade_." I am at it: Circumspice!'

So I pick out and point to other Men's Game, this Sunday Morning, when

the Sun makes the Sea shine, and a strong head wind drives the Ships with

shortened Sail across it. Last night I was with some Sailors at the Inn:

some one came in who said there was a Schooner with five feet water in

her in the Roads: and off they went to see if anything beside water could

be got out of her. But, as you say, one mustn't be epigrammatic and

clever. Just before Grog and Pipe, the Band had played some German

Waltzes, a bit of Verdi, Rossini's 'Cujus animam,' and a capital Sailors'

Tramp-chorus from Wagner, all delightful to me, on the Pier: how much

better than all the dreary oratorios going on all the week at Norwich;

Elijah, St. Peter, St. Paul, Eli, etc. There will be an Oratorio for

every Saint and Prophet; which reminds me of my last Story. Voltaire had

an especial grudge against Habakkuk. Some one proved to him that he had

misrepresented facts in Habakkuk's history. 'C'est egal,' says V.,

'Habakkuk etait capable de tout.' Cornewall Lewis, who (like most other

Whigs) had no Humour, yet tells this: I wonder if it will reach Dresden.

_To Mrs. W. H. Thompson_.

LITTLE GRANGE, WOODBRIDGE.

_Sept._ 23, [1875].

DEAR MRS. THOMPSON,

It is very good of you to write to me, so many others as, I know, you

must have to write to. I can tell you but little in return for the Story

of your Summer Travel: but what little I have to say shall be said at

once. As to Travel, I have got no further than Norfolk, and am rather

sorry I did not go further North, to the Scottish Border, at any rate.

But now it is too late. I have contented myself with my Boat on the

River here: with my Garden, Pigeons, Ducks, etc.; a great Philosopher

indeed! But (to make an end of oneself) I have not been well all the

summer; unsteady in head and feet; the Beginning of the End, I suppose;

and if the End won't be too long spinning out, one cannot complain of its

coming too soon. . . .

I had a kindly Letter from Carlyle some days ago: he was summering at

some place near Bromley in Kent, lent him by a Lady Derby; once, he says,

Lady Salisbury, which I don't understand. He had also the use of a

Phaeton and Pony; which latter he calls '_Shenstone_' from a partiality

to stopping at every Inn door. Carlyle had been a little touched in

revisiting Eltham, and remembering Frank Edgeworth who resided there

forty years ago 'with a little Spanish Wife, but no pupils.' Carlyle

would name him with a sort of sneer in the Life of Sterling; {184} could

not see that any such notice was more than needless, just after

Edgeworth's Death. This is all a little Scotch indelicacy to other

people's feelings. But now Time and his own Mortality soften him. I

have been looking over his Letters to me about Cromwell: the amazing

perseverance and accuracy of the Man, who writes so passionately! In a

letter of about 1845 or 6 he says he has burned at least six attempts at

Cromwell's Life: and finally falls back on sorting and elucidating the

Letters, as a sure Groundwork. . . .

I have this Summer made the Acquaintance of a great Lady, with whom I

have become perfectly intimate, through her Letters, Madame de Sevigne. I

had hitherto kept aloof from her, because of that eternal Daughter of

hers; but 'it's all Truth and Daylight,' as Kitty Clive said of Mrs.

Siddons. Her Letters from Brittany are best of all, not those from

Paris, for she loved the Country, dear Creature; and now I want to go and

visit her 'Rochers,' but never shall.

_To E. B. Cowell_.

[1875.]

MY DEAR COWELL,

. . . I told Elizabeth, I think, all I had to write about Arthur C. I

had a letter from him a few days ago, hoping to see me in London, where I

thought I might be going about this time, and where I would not go

without giving him notice to meet me, poor lad. As yet however I cannot

screw my Courage to go up: I have no Curiosity about what is to be seen

or heard there; my Day is done. I have not been very well all this

Summer, and fancy that I begin to 'smell the Ground,' as Sailors say of

the Ship that slackens speed as the Water shallows under her. I can't

say I have much care for long Life: but still less for long Death: I mean

a lingering one.

Did you ever read Madame de Sevigne? I never did till this summer,

rather repelled by her perpetual harping on her Daughter. But it is all

genuine, and the same intense Feeling expressed in a hundred natural yet

graceful ways: and beside all this such good Sense, good Feeling, Humour,

Love of Books and Country Life, as makes her certainly the Queen of all

Letter writers.

_To C. E. Norton_.

LITTLE GRANGE, WOODBRIDGE, SUFFOLK.

(_Post Mark Dec._ 8.) _Dec._ 9/75.

MY DEAR SIR,

Mr. Carlyle's Niece has sent me a Card from you, asking for a Copy of an

Agamemnon: taken--I must not say, translated--from AEschylus. It was not

meant for Greek Scholars, like yourself, but for those who do not know

the original, which it very much misrepresents. I think it is my friend

Mrs. Kemble who has made it a little known on your wide Continent. As

you have taken the trouble to enquire for it all across the Atlantic,

beside giving me reason before to confide in your friendly reception of

it, I post you one along with this letter. I can fancy you might find

some to be interested in it who do not know the original: more interested

than in more faithful Translations of more ability. But there I will

leave it: only begging that you will not make any trouble of

acknowledging so small a Gift.

Some eighty of Carlyle's Friends and Admirers have been presenting him

with a Gold Medal of himself, and an Address of Congratulation on his

80th Birthday. I should not have supposed that either Medal or Address

would be much to his Taste: but, as more important People than myself

joined in the Thing, I did not think it became me to demur. But I shall

not the less write him my half-yearly Letter of Good Hopes and Good

Wishes. He seems to have been well and happy in our pretty County of

Kent during the Summer.

Believe me, with Thanks for the Interest you have taken in my _Libretti_,

yours sincerely, E. FITZGERALD.

P.S. I am doing an odd thing in bethinking me of sending you two

Calderon Plays, which my friend Mrs. Kemble has spoken of also in your

Country. So you might one day hear of them: and, if you liked what came

before, wish to see them. So here they are, for better or worse; and, at

any rate, one Note of Thanks (which I doubt you will feel bound to write)

will do for both, and you can read as little as you please of either. All

these things have been done partly as an amusement in a lonely life:

partly to give some sort of idea of the originals to friends who knew

them not: and printed, because (like many others, I suppose) I can only

dress my best when seeing myself in Type, in the same way as I can scarce

read others unless in such a form. I suppose there was some Vanity in it

all: but really, if I had that strong, I might have done (considering

what little I can do) like Crabbe's Bachelor--

I might have made a Book, but that my Pride

In the not making was more gratified. {187}

Do you read more of Crabbe than we his Countrymen?

_To Miss Aitken_. {188a}

WOODBRIDGE. _Dec._ 9/75.

DEAR MISS AITKEN,

It is a fact that the night before last I thought I would write my half-

yearly Enquiry about your Uncle: and at Noon came your Note. I judge

from it that he is well. I think he will thrash me (as Bentley said

{188b}) even now.

I must say I scarce knew what to do when asked to join in that Birthday

Address. I did not know whether it would be agreeable to your Uncle: and

of course I could not ask him. So I asked Spedding and Pollock, and

found they were of the Party: so it did not become me to hesitate. I

hope we were not all amiss.

But as to Agamemnon the King: I shall certainly send Mr. Norton a Copy,

as he has taken the trouble to send across the Atlantic for it. But as

to Mr. Carlyle, 'c'est une autre affaire.' It was not meant for any

Greek Scholar, and only for a few not Greek, who I thought would be

interested, as they have been, in my curious Version. Among these was

Mrs. Kemble, who I suppose it is has praised it in a way that somehow

gains ground in America. But your Uncle--a few years ago he would have

been perhaps a little irritated with it; and now would not, I feel sure,

care to spend his Eyes over its sixty or seventy pages. He would even

now think--but in Pity now--how much better one might have spent one's

time (though not very much was spent) than in such Dilettanteism. So

tell him not quite to break his heart if I don't put him to the Trial:

but still believe me his, and, if you will allow me, yours sincerely,

E. FITZGERALD.

_Fragment of a Letter to Miss Biddell_.

_Dec._ 1875.

Thank you for the paragraph about Shelley. Somehow I don't believe the

Story, {189} in spite of Trelawney's Authority. Let them produce the

Confessor who is reported to tell the Story; otherwise one does not need

any more than such a Squall as we have late had in these Seas, and yet

more sudden, I believe, in those, to account for the Disaster.

I believe I told you that my Captain Newson and his Nephew, my trusty

Jack, went in the Snow to the Norfolk Coast, by Cromer, to find Newson's

Boy. They found him, what remained of him, in a Barn there: brought him

home through the Snow by Rail thus far: and through the Snow by Boat to

Felixstow, where he is to lie among his Brothers and Sisters, to the

Peace of his Father's Heart.

_To S. Laurence_.

WOODBRIDGE. _Dec._ 30/75.

MY DEAR LAURENCE,

. . . I cannot get on with Books about the Daily Life which I find rather

insufferable in practice about me. I never could read Miss Austen, nor

(later) the famous George Eliot. Give me People, Places, and Things,

which I don't and can't see; Antiquaries, Jeanie Deans, Dalgettys, etc. . . .

As to Thackeray's, they are terrible; I really look at them on the

shelf, and am half afraid to touch them. He, you know, could go deeper

into the Springs of Common Action than these Ladies: wonderful he is, but

not Delightful, which one thirsts for as one gets old and dry.

_To C. E. Norton_.

LITTLE GRANGE, WOODBRIDGE. _Jan._ 23/76.

MY DEAR SIR,

. . . I suppose you may see one of the Carlyle Medallions: and you can

judge better of the Likeness than I, who have not been to Chelsea, and

hardly out of Suffolk, these fifteen years and more. I dare say it is

like him: but his Profile is not his best phase. In two notes dictated

by him since that Business he has not adverted to it: I think he must be

a little ashamed of it, though it would not do to say so in return, I

suppose. And yet I think he might have declined the Honours of a Life of

'Heroism.' I have no doubt he would have played a Brave Man's Part if

called on; but, meanwhile, he has only sat pretty comfortably at Chelsea,

scolding all the world for not being Heroic, and not always very precise

in telling them how. He has, however, been so far heroic, as to be

always independent, whether of Wealth, Rank, and Coteries of all sorts:

nay, apt to fly in the face of some who courted him. I suppose he is

changed, or subdued, at eighty: but up to the last ten years he seemed to

me just the same as when I first knew him five and thirty years ago. What

a Fortune he might have made by showing himself about as a Lecturer, as

Thackeray and Dickens did; I don't mean they did it for Vanity: but to

make money: and that to spend generously. Carlyle did indeed lecture

near forty years ago before he was a Lion to be shown, and when he had

but few Readers. I heard his 'Heroes' which now seems to me one of his

best Books. He looked very handsome then, with his black hair, fine

Eyes, and a sort of crucified Expression.

I know of course (in Books) several of those you name in your Letter:

Longfellow, whom I may say I love, and so (I see) can't call him

_Mister_: and Emerson whom I admire, for I don't feel that I know the

Philosopher so well as the Poet: and Mr. Lowell's 'Among my Books' is

among mine. I also have always much liked, I think rather loved, O. W.

Holmes. I scarce know why I could never take to that man of true Genius,

Hawthorne. There is a little of my Confession of Faith about your

Countrymen, and I should say mine, if I were not more Irish than English.

[WOODBRIDGE. _Feb._ 7/76.]

MY DEAR SIR,

I will not look on the Book you have sent me as any Return for the

Booklet I sent you, but as a free and kindly Gift. I really don't know

that you could have sent me a better. I have read it with more

continuous attention and gratification than I now usually feel, and

always (as Lamb suggested) well disposed to say Grace after reading.

Seeing what Mr. Lowell has done for Dante, Rousseau, etc., one does not

wish him to be limited in his Subjects: but I do wish he would do for

English Writers what Ste. Beuve has done for French. Mr. Lowell so far

goes along with him as to give so much of each Writer's Life as may

illustrate his Writings; he has more Humour (in which alone I fancy S. B.

somewhat wanting), more extensive Reading, I suppose; and a power of

metaphorical Illustration which (if I may say so) seems to me to want

only a little reserve in its use: as was the case perhaps with Hazlitt.

But Mr. Lowell is not biassed by Hazlitt's--(by anybody's, so far as I

see)--party or personal prejudices; and altogether seems to me the man

most fitted to do this Good Work, where it has not (as with Carlyle's

Johnson) been done, for good and all, before. Of course, one only wants

the Great Men, in their kind: Chaucer, Pope (Dryden being done {193}),

and perhaps some of the 'minora sidera' clustered together, as Hazlitt

has done them. Perhaps all this will come forth in some future Series

even now gathering in Mr. Lowell's Head. However that may be, this

present Series will make me return to some whom I have not lately looked

up. Dante's face I have not seen these ten years: only his Back on my

Book Shelf. What Mr. Lowell says of him recalled to me what Tennyson

said to me some thirty-five or forty years ago. We were stopping before

a shop in Regent Street where were two Figures of Dante and Goethe. I (I

suppose) said, 'What is there in old Dante's Face that is missing in

Goethe's?' And Tennyson (whose Profile then had certainly a remarkable

likeness to Dante's) said: 'The Divine.' Then Milton; I don't think I've

read him these forty years; the whole Scheme of the Poem, and certain

Parts of it, looming as grand as anything in my Memory; but I never could

read ten lines together without stumbling at some Pedantry that tipped me

at once out of Paradise, or even Hell, into the Schoolroom, worse than

either. Tennyson again used to say that the two grandest of all Similes

were those of the Ships hanging in the Air, and 'the Gunpowder one,'

which he used slowly and grimly to enact, in the Days that are no more.

He certainly then thought Milton the sublimest of all the Gang; his

Diction modelled on Virgil, as perhaps Dante's.

Spenser I never could get on with, and (spite of Mr. Lowell's good word)

shall still content myself with such delightful Quotations from him as

one lights upon here and there: the last from Mr. Lowell.

Then, old 'Daddy Wordsworth,' as he was sometimes called, I am afraid,

from my Christening, he is now, I suppose, passing under the Eclipse

consequent on the Glory which followed his obscure Rise. I remember

fifty years ago at our Cambridge, when the Battle was fighting for him by

the Few against the Many of us who only laughed at 'Louisa in the Shade,'

etc. His Brother was then Master of Trinity College; like all

Wordsworths (unless the drowned Sailor) pompous and priggish. He used to

drawl out the Chapel responses so that we called him the 'Meeserable

Sinner' and his brother the 'Meeserable Poet.' Poor fun enough: but I

never can forgive the Lakers all who first despised, and then patronized

'Walter Scott,' as they loftily called him: and He, dear, noble, Fellow,

thought they were quite justified. Well, your Emerson has done him far

more Justice than his own Countryman Carlyle, who won't allow him to be a

Hero in any way, but sets up such a cantankerous narrow-minded Bigot as

John Knox in his stead. I did go to worship at Abbotsford, as to

Stratford on Avon: and saw that it was good to have so done. If you, if

Mr. Lowell, have not lately read it, pray read Lockhart's account of his

Journey to Douglas Dale on (I think) July 18 or 19, 1831. It is a piece

of Tragedy, even to the muttering Thunder, like the Lammermuir, which

does not look very small beside Peter Bell and Co.

My dear Sir, this is a desperate Letter; and that last Sentence will lead

to another dirty little Story about my Daddy: to which you must listen or

I should feel like the Fine Lady in one of Vanbrugh's Plays, 'Oh my God,

that you won't listen to a Woman of Quality when her Heart is bursting

with Malice!' And perhaps you on the other Side of the Great Water may

be amused with a little of your old Granny's Gossip.

Well then: about 1826, or 7, Professor Airy (now our Astronomer Royal)

and his Brother William called on the Daddy at Rydal. In the course of

Conversation Daddy mentioned that sometimes when genteel Parties came to

visit him, he contrived to slip out of the room, and down the garden walk

to where 'The Party's' travelling Carriage stood. This Carriage he would

look into to see what Books they carried with them: and he observed it

was generally 'WALTER SCOTT'S.' It was Airy's Brother (a very veracious

man, and an Admirer of Wordsworth, but, to be sure, more of Sir Walter)

who told me this. It is this conceit that diminishes Wordsworth's

stature among us, in spite of the mountain Mists he lived among. Also, a

little stinginess; not like Sir Walter in that! I remember Hartley

Coleridge telling us at Ambleside how Professor Wilson and some one else

(H. C. himself perhaps) stole a Leg of Mutton from Wordsworth's Larder

for the fun of the Thing.

Here then is a long Letter of old world Gossip from the old Home. I hope

it won't tire you out: it need not, you know.

P.S. By way of something better from the old World, I post you Hazlitt's

own Copy of his English Poets, with a few of his marks for another

Edition in it. If you like to keep it, pray do: if you like better to

give it to Hazlitt's successor, Mr. Lowell, do that from yourself.

_To Mrs. Cowell_.

12 MARINE TERRACE, LOWESTOFT.

_April_ 8/76.

. . . If you go to Brittany you must go to my dear Sevigne's 'Rochers.'

If I had the 'Go' in me, I should get there this Summer too: as to

Abbotsford and Stratford. She has been my Companion here; quite alive in

the Room with me. I sometimes lament I did not know her before: but

perhaps such an Acquaintance comes in best to cheer one toward the End.

_To C. E. Norton_.

LITTLE GRANGE, WOODBRIDGE.

_June_ 10 {196}, [1876].

MY DEAR SIR,

Letters of Edward FitzGerald, in Two Volumes. Vol. 2 · 第 9 / 19 段