Fig. 2261 represents an ordinary solid hand reamer for parallel holes.

The teeth are ground so that their tops form a true circle, this

grinding being done after the reamer has been hardened and tempered,

because in these processes the reamer is apt to get both out of round

and out of straight.

[Illustration: Fig. 2262.]

In some practice the reamers are formed as shown in Fig. 2262, and are

made in sets of three for each size; the first is slightly taper from

end to end, the second is slightly tapered at the entering end for a

length about or nearly equal to the diameter, and the third is parallel

and rounded on the end like the second, and in many cases only three

teeth are employed.

[Illustration: Fig. 2263.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2264.]

Fig. 2263 represents a reamer in which the distance between the cutting

edges A B, Fig. 2264, is greater than between B C, and so on, the

spacing decreasing from tooth A to tooth _a_. The spacing of _a_, _b_,

&c. to _f_ on the other side is also irregular, so that if the reamer be

given half a revolution no two teeth will have arrived at similar

positions except A and _a_, the former arriving at the position occupied

by the latter.

Now suppose that a hole to be reamed has a hollow or spongy seam along

it, and if the reamer be regularly spaced, there will at this point

occur a lateral movement of the reamer that will impair the roundness of

the hole, and this lateral movement the irregular spacing tends to

prevent.

If a solid reamer is made to standard gauge diameter when new, and the

bolts or pins turned to standard diameter, then by reason of the wear of

the reamer the work will become gradually a tighter fit and finally will

not go together, hence the reamer must be restored to standard diameter,

which may be done by upsetting the teeth with a set chisel. Furthermore

the workman's measuring gauges are themselves subject to wear, those for

measuring the pins wearing larger and those for the holes wearing

smaller, and this again is in a direction to prevent the work from

fitting together. It is preferable, therefore, to employ adjustable

reamers.

Thus Fig. 2265 represents an adjustable reamer in which the teeth fit

tightly into dovetail grooves, that are deeper at the entering than at

the shank end of the reamer, so that by forcing the teeth up the grooves

towards the shank the diameter is increased.

Both castings and forgings are found to alter somewhat in shape in

proportion as their surfaces are removed by the machine tools, so that

the shape of the work undergoes continuous alteration.

Suppose, for example, that a piece of metal two inches square and four

inches long, has a hole cast in it of an inch in diameter, and when

finished it is to be 1-3/4 inches square, 3-3/4 inches long, and have a

hole 1-1/8 diameter. Let it be chucked in a lathe or shaping machine and

have its surfaces cut down to the required dimensions. Removing the

metal to true the first surface will reduce the strain on that side of

the casting and alter the shape of the whole body, but this alteration

of form will not occur to its full extent until the piece is removed

from the pressure of the chuck jaws, or other clamping device holding it

in the machine, because this pressure holds it; as a result the surface

will not be so true after leaving the machine as it was before. On

surfacing the second side of the piece, the internal strain is still

further reduced, and a second alteration of form ensues, and so on at

the surfacing of every side of the piece. Now let the piece be chucked

true to have the hole bored out, and the removal of the metal in the

hole will again reduce the internal strain and the form of the body will

again alter.

Suppose, however, that the piece after having its surfaces thus removed,

and its hole bored as true as may be, were again trued over each

surface, and in its bore there will still be at each surfacing and at

the boring an alteration of form, although it may be to a very minute

degree, and from these causes the use of the reamer for work requiring

to be very true becomes indispensable.

[Illustration: Fig. 2265.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2266.]

Fig. 2266 represents a taper hand reamer with straight flutes. It is

preferable, however, to give the flutes a left-hand spiral, as was

explained with reference to reamers for lathe work.

[Illustration: Fig. 2267.]

The frames of large machines are frequently composed of parts that are

bolted together after having the holes for shafts, &c. bored, and to

insure the alignment of these holes after the frames are put together a

hand reaming bar, such as in Fig. 2267, is employed, A and B being two

shell reamers fastened to the bar by a pin.

[Illustration: Fig. 2268.]

Reamers are sometimes employed to enlarge holes or bring them fair one

with another, without reference to their being precise to a designated

diameter; thus Fig. 2268 represents a half-round reamer of the form used

by boiler makers to bring rivet holes fair, and sometimes by machinists

to ream the holes for taper securing pins. The flat face is cut down to

below the centre line, so that the back requires no clearance ground

upon it.

[Illustration: Fig. 2269.]

The square reamer shown in Fig. 2269 is used for rough work generally,

although with careful grinding and use it will produce excellent results

upon work of small diameter. Brass finishers generally prefer a square

reamer to all others for reaming the bores of brass cocks, &c., and some

of them prefer that one edge only be sharpened to cut, the other three

being oilstoned off so as not to cut, but simply serve as guides. The

square reamer is very easily sharpened whether by grinding or

oil-stoning; the flat sides are operated on, taking care to keep them

straight and the thickness even on the two diameters, so that, the sides

being straight and the reamer square, it will cut taper holes whose

sides will be straight. If the reamer is not ground square, two only of

the edges will be liable to have contact with the work bore, causing the

reamer to wabble, and rendering it liable to break.

[Illustration: Fig. 2270.]

Another and very good form of reamer for the rapid removal of metal is

shown in Fig. 2270, having three teeth and a good deal of clearance,

which enables it to work steadily and cut freely.

CHAPTER XXVI.--VICE WORK--(_Continued_).

In most of the operations of the machine-shop, the work of the chisel is

followed by that of the file; hence, as an example in the use of the

chisel independent of that of the file, the cutting of the teeth upon

files may be given as follows:--

[Illustration: Fig. 2271.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2272.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2273.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2274.]

The largest and smallest chisels commonly used in cutting files are

represented in two views and half size in Figs. 2271 and 2272. The first

is a chisel for large rough files; the length is about 3 inches, the

width 2-1/2 inches, and the angle of the edge about 50°; the edge is

perfectly straight, but the one bevel is a little more inclined than the

other; this chisel requires a hammer of about 7 or 8 pounds weight. Fig.

2272 is the chisel used for small superfine files; its length is 2

inches, the width 1/2 inch; it is very thin, and sharpened at about the

angle of 35°; it is used with a hammer weighing only 1 or 2 ounces; as

it will be seen, the weight of the blow mainly determines the distance

between the teeth. Other chisels are made of intermediate proportions,

but the width of the edge always exceeds that of the file to be cut. The

first cut is made at the point of the file; the chisel is held in the

left hand, at a horizontal angle of about 55° with the central line of

the file, as at _a_ _a_, 2273, and with a vertical inclination of about

12° to 4° from the perpendicular, as represented in Fig. 2274, supposing

the tang of the file to be on the left-hand side. The following are

nearly the usual angles for the vertical inclination of the chisels,

namely: For rough rasps, 15° beyond the perpendicular; rough files, 12°;

bastard files, 10°; second-cut files 5°, and dead-smooth-cut files 4°.

The blow of the hammer upon the chisel causes the latter to indent and

slightly to drive forward the steel, thereby throwing up a trifling

ridge or burr; the chisel is immediately replaced on the blank, and slid

from the operator until it encounters the ridge previously thrown up,

which arrests the chisel or prevents it from slipping farther back, and

thereby determines the succeeding position of the chisel. The chisel

having been placed in its second position, is again struck with the

hammer, which is made to give the blows as nearly as possible of uniform

strength, and the process is repeated with considerable rapidity and

regularity, 60 to 80 cuts being made in one minute, until the entire

length of the file has been cut with inclined parallel and equidistant

ridges, which are collectively denominated the "first course." So far as

this one face is concerned, the file, if intended to be single-cut,

would be then ready for hardening, and when greatly enlarged its section

would be somewhat as in Fig. 2274.

The teeth of some single-cut files are much less inclined than 58°;

those of floats are in general square across the instrument. Most files,

however, are double-cut, and for these the surface of the file is now

smoothed by passing a smooth file once or twice along the face of the

teeth, to remove only so much of the roughness as would obstruct the

chisel from sliding along the face in receiving its successive

positions, and the file is again greased. The second course of teeth is

now cut, the chisel being inclined vertically as before, or at about

12°, but horizontally about 5° to 10° from the rectangle, as at _b_ _b_,

Fig. 2273. The blows are now given a little less strongly, so as barely

to penetrate to the bottom of the first cuts, and consequently the

second course of cuts is somewhat finer than the first. The two series

of courses fill the surface of the file with teeth which are inclined

toward the point of the file. If the file is flat and to be cut on two

faces, it is now turned over; but to protect the teeth from the hard

face of the anvil a thin plate of pewter is interposed. Triangular and

other files require blocks of lead having grooves of the appropriate

sections to support the blanks, so that the surface to be cut may be

placed horizontally. Taper files require the teeth to be somewhat finer

toward the point, to avoid the risk of the blank being weakened or

broken in the act of its being cut, which might occur if as much force

were used in cutting the teeth at the point of the file as in those at

its central and stronger part. Eight courses of cuts are required to

complete a double-cut rectangular file that is cut on all faces, but

eight, ten, or even more courses are required in cutting only the one

rounded face of a half-round file. There are various objections to

employing chisels with concave edges, and therefore, in cutting round

and half-round files, the ordinary straight chisel is used and applied

as a tangent to the curve. It will be found that in a smooth,

half-round file 1 inch in width, about twenty courses are required for

the convex side, and two courses alone serve for the flat side. In some

of the double-cut, gullet-tooth saw-files, as many as twenty-three

courses are sometimes used for the convex face, and but two for the

flat. The same difficulty occurs in a round file, and the surfaces of

curvilinear files do not therefore present, under ordinary

circumstances, the same uniformity as those of flat files.

[Illustration: Fig. 2275.]

The teeth of rasps are cut with a punch, which is represented in two

views, Fig. 2275. The punch for a fine cabinet rasp is about 3-1/2

inches long and 5/8 inch square at its widest part. Viewed in front, the

two sides of the point meet at an angle of about 60°; viewed edgewise,

or on profile, the edge forms an angle of about 50°, the one face being

only a little inclined to the body of the tool. In cutting rasps, the

punch is sloped rather more from the operator than the chisel in cutting

files, but the distance between the teeth of the rasp cannot be

determined, as in the file, by placing the punch in contact with the

burr of the tooth previously made. By dint of habit the workman

moves--or, technically, hops--the punch the required distance; to

facilitate this movement, he places a piece of woollen cloth under his

left hand, which prevents his hand from coming immediately in contact

with and adhering to the anvil.

As an example in the use of the chisel for chipping purposes, let it be

required to fasten a feather on a shaft.

There are four methods of inserting feathers: First, a shaft may have a

parallel recess sunk into it and a parallel feather may be driven in;

second, the feather may be made slightly taper and driven in; third, the

feather may be dovetailed on the sides and ends both, or on the ends

only, and as one or the other of these is the proper method, and the

process is the same for both, one only need be described.

[Illustration: Fig. 2276.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2277.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2278.]

In Fig. 2276 let S represent a shaft and F a feather, required by the

drawing to be permanently fixed therein. The drawing will not, in

ordinary shop practice, give any instructions as to how the feather is

to be fastened; hence the mechanic usually exercises his own judgment

about the matter, or is governed by the practice of the shop. If left to

his own judgment he may determine to so fix it that it may be locked on

all four sides, as in Fig. 2277, or he may simply set it in as in the

similar views shown in Fig. 2278.

The method shown in Fig. 2277 is the most secure and best job; but, on

the other hand, it is the most difficult and costly. The difficulty

consists in filing the parallel part above the surface of the shaft to a

line that shall be quite even with the surface of the shaft. This

difficulty may be overcome by leaving the sides parallel, and making the

length A equal to the length of the acting part of the key, and the

bottom B as much longer as may be required to get the required amount of

dovetail on the feather ends.

[Illustration: Fig. 2279.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2280.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2281.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2282.]

The first thing to do is to mark off the keyway by scribing lines on the

surface of the shaft, indicating the location for the feather seat; and

for this purpose nothing is better than the key seat rule shown in Fig.

2279, in which W is the key seat rule, and S the shaft. After the lines

are drawn they should be defined by centre-punch dots, as in Fig. 2280,

and then the metal should be cut out on the sides first, using a cape

chisel, and cutting close to the side lines, as in Fig. 2281, in which A

is a cape chisel cut taken along one side, D a second cape chisel cut,

being carried along the other side, C the cape chisel, C´ the cut taken

by the chisel, and B a piece of metal to be cut out after the cape

chisel has done its work. Suppose, now, the mass of the metal is

removed, then the dovetailing is performed as follows: Next the

_setting_ or _upsetting_ is proceeded with as shown in Fig. 2282, which

is a side sectional view. S is a set chisel driven by hammer blows

against the walls of the feather seat (as against the end _e_), causing

it to bulge up, as shown at _f_. This setting will enlarge the feather

seat or recess, so that the wide part of the dovetail on the feather

will just pass in (the dotted lines shown in Fig. 2281 having, of

course, been marked to the size of the feather, where it will, when

fixed, meet the surface of the shaft). The feather is then placed in its

seat and bedded properly by red marking applied to its bottom surface to

show the high spots on the seat of the recess, and when properly bedded

it is fastened, as in Fig. 2283, in which S is a set chisel, which, by

being struck with hammer blows, closes the bulged metal back again on

the dovetail of the feather, and firmly locks it in the shaft. And all

that remains is to file the shaft surface around the feather level with

the surrounding surface, there being usually a little surplus metal from

the upsetting.

[Illustration: Fig. 2283.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2284.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2285.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2286.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2287.]

As an example of chipping and filing let it be required to chip and file

to shape and to fit a knuckle joint (or a double and single eye, as it

may more properly be termed), such as in Fig. 2284. The eye being marked

out by lines, the first operation will be to remove the surplus metal

around the edges by chipping, which should be done (with the pin in

place, so that it may support the eye) before the joint faces are filed

at all, and should be carried in a direction around the eye, as shown in

Fig. 2285, in which _v_ is the vice jaw, E a lead clamp, C the cut, and

D the chisel. By chipping in this direction two ends are served: first,

the force of the chipping blows is less likely to bend the eye if it is

a light one, and, secondly, the chipping will not break out the metal at

the edge of the eye, which it would be apt to do if the chipping was

carried across. This is shown in Fig. 2286, where a chisel cut is

supposed to have been carried across from A to B and a piece has broken

out at B. If the width of the eye is too broad for one chisel cut, a

cape chisel should be run around it, as in Fig. 2287, A D showing the

cutting, the flat chisel cuts B, C being taken separately afterwards.

In order to illustrate the filing clearly, it will be necessary to show

more metal to be filed off than would be the case in practice, unless

the eye were very small, in which case it would not pay to chip.

[Illustration: Fig. 2288.]

Put the eyes together with the pin in and let the two lowest places on

the edges coincide. Then file a flat place clear across them, as shown

in Fig. 2288 at F, making it parallel to the pin, and, say, down to

within 1/100 of the finished depth. To test the parallelism of the flat

place, take out the pin and apply to the flat place a square, rested

against the radial face of the double eye, or measure its distance from

the hole of the eye on each side of the double eye, that is at each end

of the hole.

[Illustration: Fig. 2289.]

When it is true and down to the required size, put the eyes together and

let their relative positions be such that the flat places do not

coincide, and that on the double eye will serve as a guide to carry the

filing around the single eye, while that on the single eye will serve as

a guide to carry the filing around the double eye, as will be seen on

reference to Fig. 2289, in which the flat places A, B on the double eye

serve as a guide to file C down to, while the flat place on the single

eye at D is a guide to file the metal at E, F down to, and it is obvious

that by moving the eyes to different positions the eye may on that side

be filed true and to circle.

When the filing has thus been carried around as far as the movement of

the eyes permits on that side, turn the single eye over in the double

eye, and they will appear as shown in the end view, Fig. 2290, A being

the filed side of the single and E D that of the double eye; hence the

metal at C, B must be filed down level with A, and that at F down level

with E, D.

[Illustration: Fig. 2290.]

We have assumed that the edges only required finishing irrespective of

the joint faces; but let it be assumed that the whole of the eye has

been dressed up by machine tools, and that it requires fitting and

finishing by the file both on its joint faces and on its edges.

If the eye has been bored and faced in the lathe the faces will be about

true with the hole, but if it has had its faces trued in a machine, as a

planer or slotter, and the hole bored subsequently in a slotting

machine, the hole may not be true to the faces. This may occur from want

of truth in the chucking devices, from these devices having been held to

a table or carriage moving on slides, and having lost motion or play, in

which case from the leverage of the pressure of the boring tool-reamer

or bit, this table may have lifted to the extent of such play, in which

case the hole will not be at a right angle to the face or faces.

[Illustration: Fig. 2291.]

First, then, these faces must be tested for truth and smoothed by

filing. The best testing device is a pin and washer, the pin neatly

fitting the hole in the eye and the washer neatly fitting the pin. The

radial face of the pin head and of the washer should then be given a

light coat of marking, and be inserted in the eye, as shown in Fig.

2291, in which _a_ is the pin head and B the washer. If each be then

rotated under pressure against the eye, they will mark the high spots,

which may be filed and draw-filed until an even contact all around is

shown.

The single eye should be similarly faced and fitted, a somewhat tight

fit, into the double eye. In a job of this kind, where accuracy of fit

is essential, it is usual to bore the hole about 1/100 inch smaller than

its finished diameter, and after fitting the two eyes, to ream out the

eyes while bolted together.

For the reaming the two eyes should be clamped together. The single eye

is left somewhat too tight a fit to the double eye to permit of the

finishing being done after the holes are reamed, because the reaming may

slightly alter the axial line of the hole. The two bolts holding the

clamping plates should be brought just home on the plates, and then

tightened up gradually and alternately, so that the eyes may be gripped

fair, and not liable to move during the reaming. The bores of the eyes

should be set as true as possible one with the other before the plates

are tightened upon the eyes, for if it is attempted to set the eyes true

by hammer blows afterwards, the pressure of the plates would cause the

arm or hub of the double eye which received the hammer blow to move more

than the other, or, in other words, to spring out of its normal

position, and the eye will be distorted. But when released from the

pressure of the clamping plate the double eye will resume its normal

shape, and the holes will not be axially true in the two eyes.

After the holes are reamed the temporary pin and washer used for the

facing will be too loose, and the proper pin should be used for all

future operations. The eyes should be put together with a light coat of

marking on both faces of the single eye, and, with the pin in place, one

eye should be moved back and forth, when they may be taken apart again

and filed on the high spots. When by repetition of this process they fit

properly the outside edges may be filed up, as already described.

It is obvious, however, that the pin and washer shown in the figure may

be hardened and used to file the edges up before the reaming, in which

case, their diameters being equal, and equal to that of the required

finished diameter of the eye, it is easy to file the eye edges true and

to size; but even in this case the eyes should be finished by reversing

and moving as before described. There is, however, the objection to

filing the edges--first, that the joint will show plainer, because in

filing the side faces to fit the single into the double eye, that part

of each face near the edge is apt to be filed away slightly too much,

causing the joint to show; but if the circumferential edges of the eye

be filed last, the part so filed away is removed and the joint may be

made almost invisible.

The best plan of all is to first fit the eyes, then ream them out and

then provide a hardened pin and washer to fit the reamed hole, then file

down the circumferential edges nearly level with the pin and washer and

finish by reversing and moving the eyes as before described.

In the absence of any pin and washer, such as shown in Fig. 2291, the

inside faces of the jaws of the double eye must be filed parallel to the

outside radial faces of the single eye, the outside surfaces being trued

when the hole is bored. If none of the surfaces have been trued with the

hole, the outer ones should first be trued, using a [T]-square (if there

is no pin) to test the truth of the face with the hole, and the inside

jaw faces must be trued with the outside, measuring each jaw with

outside calipers, and the width between the jaws with inside calipers.

[Illustration: Fig. 2292.]

Let us now suppose that it were attempted to first fit the single to the

double eye a tight fit, then to ream the hole and then to make the joint

an easy working fit. In this case the finished hole in one eye may

become out of true with that in the other, that is, it may not be

parallel with that in the other, and for the following reasons:--The

holes of the two eyes will rarely come quite true with each other, even

though the radial faces of the eyes be turned in the lathe or faced in a

machine when the holes are bored, and it is the duty of the reamer to

true as well as smooth them in whatever direction they may be out of

true or face one with the other until they are put together. Now, if

they be put together a tight fit, the outside jaws are sprung open to

some extent. Again, they may be sprung slightly atwist, and if the hole

be reamed true and this twist taken out afterwards the hole will come

atwist or out of fair in proportion as the jaws lose their twist from

being fitted.

Again, reaming the hole slightly alters its axial line, and the radial

faces, if at a right angle to the hole before reaming, will not be so

after reaming, and it is not practicable to discover in just what

direction and to what degree reaming the hole will alter its axial

direction; hence, the single eye must be fitted as near as may be before

the holes are reamed, and finished afterwards as described.

Let it be required to reduce by filing, the diameter of a round pin or

to file it to fit a taper hole, and the diameter of the pin being small

it may be held by one end in the vice jaws or by means of the clamps,

shown in Fig. 2091 or those in Fig. 2092. But the filing can be more

truly and easily finished as in Fig. 2292, in which there is shown

fastened in the vice a filing block having [V]-grooves (of varying width

to suit varying diameters of work), in which the pin to be filed may be

rested.

The pin is held by the hand vice shown, and is rotated towards the

operator during the forward file stroke (one hand holding the hand vice

and the other the file), and in the opposite direction during the back

stroke. After every few file strokes the hand vice is partly rotated in

the hand so that the whole of the pin surface may be subjected to the

file. The hand vice enables the pin to be forced into its hole and

rotated, to show by the contact or bearing marks where it requires

filing to adjust the fit.

[Illustration: Fig. 2293.]

Fig. 2293 represents an excellent form of hand vice for holding pins,

&c., the jaws being pivoted to a cross piece and opened by a cone, the

handle threading to the stem of the cross piece, and being hollow so

that the work may pass through it. The work is thus very firmly gripped

and not liable to move in the jaws as it is when the hand vice is

fastened upon the work by a thumb nut.

Very thin pieces of metal cannot be well held in the vice jaws, and as

an example of this kind of work holding, let it be required to file up a

caliper leg, which being curved cannot well be held in any of the vice

fixtures heretofore shown.

[Illustration: Fig. 2294.]

In Fig. 2294 there is a block of wood having an extension at A that may

be gripped in the vice jaws. Upon the surface of the block the caliper

leg is held by brads or nails driven around its edge, as shown, or it is

obvious screws may be used.

[Illustration: Fig. 2295.]

An excellent example of filing is to file up a hexagon nut or a bolt

head. This is apparently a simple piece of work, but it is in fact a job

that requires a good deal of care and precision to properly accomplish.

The requirements are that the nut shall measure alike across the flats,

that each flat shall be parallel to the axial line of the bolt, and at a

proper and equal angle to both of its neighbors, and that the nut shall

be of equal thickness all round. The method of accomplishing this result

is as follows: Let Fig. 2295 represent a bolt head, after it has been

turned in the lathe. It will be observed that the end face of the bolt

head is rounded. Now a bolt head of this form gives a very neat

appearance, but it presents difficulties in the filing up, as we shall

see presently.

[Illustration: Fig. 2296.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2297.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2298.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2299.]

Suppose that one flat (which we will call flat A) of a nut, is nearest

to the bore, then to make the nut of equal thickness all around, the

other flats must be so filed down as to approach the bore as nearly as A

does, and it is assumed that there is metal enough to permit this. The

flat A will then be the first one to be filed up, taking off just

sufficient to make it true when tested by the nut gauge, applied as in

Fig. 2296, in which N is the nut, and G the gauge. The flat must also be

filed true when tested by the gauge, as in Figs. 2297 and 2298, the

gauge G being tried rested on A and applied to B, and then rested on A

and applied to C. A should be filed so that, if possible, it will be at

the proper angle to both B and C, but if, from errors in the angles of B

and C, this is impossible, the error should be divided between the two,

as shown, for example, in Figs. 2299 and 2300, where the gauge is shown

in the two positions necessary to test each respective flat, B and C;

the amount of error being equal at H and I.

The next flat to file will be E, Fig. 2299. Now, in a small nut, the

chamfer of the nut edge will be sufficient guide to the eye in filing E

to an equal thickness (that is, equal for distance from the bore to A).

In order that the finished nut shall be so true that the nut gauge shall

show that the flats or angles are true one with the other all around the

nut, it is necessary that the flat E shall stand parallel to A; hence it

should be made so by measurement with calipers, irrespective of its

angle to either D or F. After E is filed it will serve as a base from

which D and F may be filed to angle, while A will serve as a base from

which the flats D and C may be filed to angle; but, while testing the

angle with the gauge, C and D should be tried for parallelism, and F and

B for parallelism, while the diameters across these flats should be

equal on all sides.

[Illustration: Fig. 2300.]

If it were attempted to go all around the nut, filing to the gauge, as,

for example, filing C, Fig. 2300, from A, F from C, E from F, D from E,

and B from D, all the error in the angle of the gauge, or errors of

workmanship, will (supposing the latter to be always in the same

direction) be multiplied upon, or rather added to B when tested with A,

and these two will not be of correct angle. Again, any error made upon

one flat will be copied upon the one filed to gauge angle from it;

whereas, filing E parallel to A insures the correctness of these two,

and testing the parallelism of the others, as B, F, serves to discover

and correct any error of angle that may exist. It is obvious that in

filing each flat the gauge must be applied as in Fig. 2296, as well as

in Fig. 2298.

In filing the opposite flats to diameter to fit the wrench or gauge, if

one be used, it is best to leave them a tight fit until all are nearly

finished, so that any error that may be discovered may be corrected

while finishing them.

[Illustration: Fig. 2301.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2302.]

In small nuts, if two are to be filed, a better plan may be followed.

The two nuts may be put upon a short piece of screw, as shown in Fig.

2301, and screwed firmly together. In doing this, however, it may be

found that the nuts will not tighten against each other, with the flats

fair one with the other. This, however, may be accomplished by winding

around the piece of screw, and between the nuts, a piece of waste,

twine, or rag, and then screwing them together until they bind

sufficiently and the sides come fair; the nuts may then be put in the

vice, the jaws of the latter meeting the end A of the screw and the face

B of the nut in the figure. Select the thinnest flat on either of the

two nuts, and file it and the one coincident to it, but on the other

nut, at the same time taking care that both are filed equidistant from

the screw. To test this, apply the gauge as shown in Fig. 2296. File

these faces down a little above size, and then loose the nuts and put in

an addition of waste or twine, so that the same faces shall not

coincide, and the two filed faces will serve as guides, down to which

their new contiguous faces may be filed, the hexagon gauge being applied

as before. By adding waste or twine, this process may be repeated, the

original, or first-filed faces serving as guides down to which to file

all the others, which will insure equal thickness of all the flats.

After roughing out all the flats in this manner, reverse the nuts on the

screw, so that the two chamfered faces come together, as in Fig. 2302,

and any want of truth in the parallelism of the flats one with the

other, or with the axial line of the screw, will become at once

apparent, and will be corrected in the finishing, providing that an

equal amount be filed off the respective sides that are in the same

plane as are A and B in the figure. Of course nuts filed in this way

require the application of the calipers and gauges, the same as

described for a single nut; but uniformity will be assured and the

filing truer, because the filing in small nuts, as an inch or less, will

be more true on account of there being a larger area for the file to

rest and steady upon. It is obvious that a plain cylindrical piece,

instead of a piece of screw, may be used, in which case the waste or

twine will be unnecessary; but in this case the plug, or cylindrical

piece, should be shorter than the length of the two nuts, and should not

be so tight a fit to the bores as to damage the threads.

In small nuts it will not pay to chip off the surplus metal, because

they cannot be held sufficiently firmly in the vice without suffering

damage from the vice-jaws, or even from copper clamps, while lead ones

are too soft to hold them.

[Illustration: Fig. 2303.]

The finishing marks, if any, should be in a line with the bore of the

nut, which gives the neatest appearance. The process is the same for a

bolt head, such as shown in Fig. 2295, as for a single nut, with the

exception that the gauge must be applied as in Fig. 2303, when testing

the truth of the flats with the axial line of the bolt, this being

necessary because of the roundness of the end face A, in Fig. 2303. The

distances D and C will be equal when the flat is true in that direction.

A pair of outside calipers form an excellent example in vice work. The

material should be good cast steel of an even thickness, and therefore

(unless for very large ones) saw blade will answer the purpose. It

should be well softened by being made to a low red heat and buried in

fine cinder ashes or lime, and allowed to cool there; the proper width

of this piece of steel being sufficiently greater than the size of the

caliper washer, to allow room for a chisel cut and leave a little to

file off in truing up the joint. The length should be somewhat more than

that required to make the legs, because a piece will be required to be

cut off the narrow end to give substance enough for the points. The size

of the washer should be drawn at each end of the steel, the centre of

the washer should be centrepunch-marked, and a line should then be drawn

to set off the two legs. The steel is then severed along this line, thus

getting out the two rough legs. When shears are not at hand, or when it

is not designed to use them for this purpose, three methods of dividing

may be pursued: First, we may drill small holes along the line, and cut

between the holes with a chisel. The objection to this is that the blade

is sometimes very hard to drill. Secondly, we may make centrepunch

marks along the line, and then cut along the line with a chisel; and

thirdly, we may drill a few holes at each end, and cut the middle with

the centrepunch and chisel. The entire drilling is the safest, and the

centrepunching the most hazardous, but it can be accomplished if the

centrepunching is done lightly and gone over several times, with the

chisel applied between the centrepunch marks, which will be much the

quickest plan of the three.

The hole is next drilled for the rivet, care being taken to make it

about 1/32 inch smaller than the proper size, because the drill will not

make a sufficiently true and parallel hole, and the latter must be

reamed or trued out; and again because the legs have to go into the fire

to be bent, and hence the holes may become damaged. There is another

consideration, however, in determining the size to drill this hole,

which is that the two legs require to be riveted together to bend them,

and it is as well to drill the hole to suit the piece of metal intended

to be used for this temporary rivet, which should be of brass or copper,

so as to drive out easily after the bending is done. During the bending

process the points should be thickened, care being taken not to twist

them in the process. If the vice hand does the bending, the following

instructions are pertinent: Heat the steel slowly and turn it over and

over in the fire so that the points may not get burned before the wider

parts are sufficiently heated. Let the fire be a clean one, that is,

with no gaseous or blazing coal about it, or the coal will stick to the

sides of the calipers, and they will get cool while being cleaned of

adhering coal after being taken from the fire. Begin the bending from

the thick end, carrying it forward by degrees. Strike light but rapidly

succeeding blows, placing the steel upon the round point of the anvil.

The bending completed, and the points being thickened, the edges of the

legs are trimmed upon an emery wheel or with a file, using the latter

lengthwise of the edges if a new one, or crosswise if an old one. A full

1/32 inch may be left to trim off after the calipers are put together.

The temporary rivet may next be driven out, first, however, gripping the

legs firmly and near to the rivet end with a hand vice, putting a piece

of sheet brass between each jaw of the hand vice and the steel;

otherwise the teeth of the latter will mark the steel, entailing a great

deal of extra labor to file the marks out. The rivet hole is then reamed

out to the required size, the two legs being held together by the hand

vice to render the reaming more steady and true by making the hole

longer when the two are together.

The next operation is to turn the rivet and washers. It is a very common

practice to turn two separate washers and a rivet. On account, however,

of the small amount of bearing in the washer holes, such washers are apt

to rivet up out of fair one with the other, making an unsightly joint

and causing them to be out of round when the edges of the joint are

filed up. A better plan is to turn a pin and washer, taking care to make

the diameters of the two exactly equal and the flat faces of each quite

level. The pin should be turned about 1/64 inch taper, the small end

being made a neat fit to the holes in the caliper legs, and should be

made of cast steel properly annealed. When finished, the head of the pin

should be gripped by a pair of lead clamps in the vice, the end being

left protruding so that the legs can be put upon it and revolved back

and forth with a good supply of oil and under hard pressure, so that the

pin will be forced a good and rather tight fit into the holes. This

process will also smooth out the holes and condense the metal around

both the holes and the pin. It is well to leave the pin to fit about one

half as tight as the finished joint requires to be. The washer should be

countersunk about three-quarters of the way through the hole, the latter

being left a close working fit to the pin.

The legs should be rough filed, second-cut filed, and smooth filed

before being draw-filed, care being used to keep the files clean, so as

to avoid scratches. During this filing, however, the pin should be tried

in the hole to see if the head comes fair down upon the face; thus the

pin forms a guide and test in facing up the joint of the leg, and this

is one of its advantages over the two-washer plan. After carefully

draw-filing and polishing the sides of the legs the fitting of the joint

is finished as follows: Place the two legs upon the pin in their proper

position, and then put the washer into its place. Then behind the washer

place another temporary one that will protrude beyond the end of the

pin; then grip the whole tightly between a pair of lead clamps or pieces

of thick leather in the vice; this will bring all parts of the joint

home. Take hold of one leg in each hand and move them backward and

forward as far as the vice will let them go, repeating the operation

about a dozen times or more. This will mark the high spots upon the

legs, which may then be taken apart again and have the bright parts

removed by a scraper. It is also well to place the flat face of the

washer upon a smooth file and rub it backward and forward under finger

pressure, which will tend to correct any defect in its flatness. When

the faces of the joint bear all over, it may be put together with oil

and placed in the vice as before. Work it well back and forth, take it

apart again and cut off the rivet to the required length, taking care

very slightly to recess the end to assist the riveting. The whole joint

should then be wiped quite clean, freely oiled, and put together ready

to rivet. The head of the pin should be rested upon a block of lead, so

that it will not get damaged. The riveting should be done with a small

light ball-pened hammer, the blows being delivered very lightly and

evenly all round the edge. As the riveting continues it is necessary to

move the legs occasionally to see how the tightening proceeds, and when

the legs are sufficiently tight, one of them may be gripped between

pieces of leather in the vice, while the other is well worked and

lubricated with oil. Then the riveted end should be filed off to very

nearly its proper height and shape, and the joint well worked back and

forth and round and round in the hand until it gets quite warm, when it

may be cooled in water and tried for tightness. If too tight, it may be

either worked until easy, or the riveted end of the pin may be tapped

with a hammer to loosen it slightly. The riveting being completed, and

the end filed smooth, the rounded part of the washer and the pin head

should be draw-filed with a very fine file moved in varying directions,

and then the polishing may be done with emery paper.

FITTING KEYS.--Keys that have been planed or milled will still require

fitting with the file to insure that they bed properly. If the key to be

fitted is taper and intended to fit top and bottom, the sides should

first be filed true to a surface plate, and fitted into the keyway in

the shaft, so that it can be slid up and down a good working fit. While

fitting it, however, it is well to try it once or twice in the keyway in

the wheel, as well as in the shaft, so as to see by the marks whether

the keyways in the shaft and wheel require any fitting at all, either to

make them quite square with the outside face, supposing it to be turned

off, or to give them a good even bearing surface. The key being fitted

sideways we must give the two keyseats a coating of red marking just

sufficient to show that the surface is of a red tint, and then put the

wheel in its place on the shaft. Then we bevel off the edges of the key

at each end, leaving a chamfer of 1/16 inch, and after facing off the

top of the key with a bastard file, we place it in the keyway and tap it

very lightly to a gentle bearing. After driving the key lightly home and

taking it out again, we may file it on the top and bed it on the bottom,

according to the indication of the marking, and re-insert it, tapping it

up until it is home, top and bottom, without being a driven fit at all;

on taking it out we file it according to the marks again, and if we

continue this process until the key is a good fit, it will not spring

the wheel the least out of true, no matter how tight, reasonably, it is

finally driven. The key must never be driven in or out dry, for it will,

in that case, inevitably cut during the first part of the operation; the

marking put on the keyway is sufficient lubrication, but after two or

three insertions the key also should be itself given a light coat, which

will serve as lubrication, as well as denote the fit.

The bearing or contact marks upon a key driven home very lightly may

show at one end or on one side only, while if the key was driven farther

in those marks may show all over, making the key appear to fit much

better than it actually does. This occurs from the elasticity and

compression of the metal of the keyway and key, the metal giving most

where the contact is hardest; from this it is apparent that a wheel

truly bored and a good fit may be set out of true by the key.

In Fig. 2304, for example, is a wheel hub W, assumed to be a good fit to

the shaft S, while the key K fits at the end A only. If the key be

driven tightly home, the wheel will spring over, so that instead of the

plane of its diameter standing at a right angle to the axial line of the

shaft as at D in Fig. 2305, it will stand at an angle as at E, throwing

the wheel out of true in that direction. This would occur not only on

account of the elasticity and compression of the metal of the keyway,

but also because the surface of the bore of the wheel and of the shaft

is not, even under the best of turning, smooth enough to come into close

contact all over, but are covered with slight projections or

protuberances, which may occur in spirals because of the turning tool

marks, or in localities because of differences in the texture of the

metal. In driving the key home these protuberances give way, and they do

so most where the contact pressure is greatest, which would be at G in

Fig. 2305, causing the wheel to cant over. If the wheel is not a good

fit to the shaft it will not in this case touch the shaft at C, Fig.

2305.

[Illustration: Fig. 2304.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2305.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2306.]

Now suppose the key to bear at _a_ and _b_, Fig. 2306, only, then the

wheel would be thrown out of true in a direction at a right angle to the

length of the key as denoted by the line E, which should stand as at D.

A properly bedded key binds the opposite half of the circumference of

the wheel bore to the corresponding half circumference of the shaft; but

if the key binds at one end only, as in Fig. 2304, the contact will be

at the end H only; hence the surfaces will soon compress, on account of

all the strain of the key falling on a small area, and the key will get

loose.

It is obvious then that if a wheel has not been bored to run true the

error may be to some extent corrected in fitting the key, but in this

case the key must be driven well home, and the wheel rim tried for

running true during the fitting process, the key being so bedded as to

true the wheel as far as the elasticity and compression will permit; but

a key thus bedded will not hold so firmly.

The distance a key of a certain length, breadth, and thickness, and of a

given taper, will drive after being pushed home by hand or lightly

tapped in with a hand hammer depends upon how closely it fits to its

seat, and upon the elasticity of the metal, as well as upon the force

with which it is driven. The workman usually, while fitting the key,

drives it well home occasionally, to see how much of its length to allow

for the final driving, and while doing so, if the key is a small one, a

hand set chisel or a piece of copper should be interposed between the

key head and the hammer (a blacksmith's set chisel is used for large

keys) to prevent the hammer from damaging the key.

In fitting keys to old keyways the key is made too long, and cut off

after being driven home. A long key is apt to bend in the driving, hence

it is not unusual to support it by holding a second hammer beneath and

against it to support it while being driven. In driving a key out,

especially if it is fast home, a quick heavy blow is best, as it is less

likely to burr, swell, or bulge the end of the key. But after the key

has started lighter blows will answer.

To make a key for an old sunk keyway, it is as well to fit a piece of

wood thereto as a guide in forging and fitting the key. If a _fast_

running grindstone or emery wheel is at hand, many will forge the key a

trifle large and then grind it as near as possible, and finish by

filing. This, however, does not produce good work; it is better to plane

the key all over, leaving a little in size for fitting. In preparing the

piece of wood referred to, it should not in the fitting be driven or

even forced in and out to try the fit, for the wood will compress and

the marks mislead as to the actual fit. The proper way is to chalk the

piece of wood and push it up the keyway just tightly home, then withdraw

and fit it again.

In cases where the key is forged to very nearly the finished size, and

is finished by the file, as sometimes occurs when away from the shop, it

is best to forge the key with a gib head, as in Fig. 462, to assist in

extracting it, especially when it is difficult to drive the key out from

the back end, or when the keyway does not pass entirely through. The key

should be finished with a smooth file and with the file marks

lengthways; it is, in fact, better to use a small smooth file and

draw-file it, taking care to ease the high spots the most; and before

driving it home both it and the keyway should be oiled.

If a keyway is to be cut by hand through a bore, as in a pulley or

gear-wheel bore, its width should be marked with a [T]-square. If its

width does not exceed 1/2 inch a cape chisel a little less (say 1/32

inch less) than the finished width of keyway should be used, which will

leave a little metal for the sides to be filed true. If the keyway be an

inch wide it is better to take a cape chisel about 1/4 inch wide and cut

a groove along each side of the keyway (keeping close to the marked

line), and then cut out the middle with a flat chisel. The sides and

bottom of the keyway should be surfaced true with the file.

If a keyway is to be cut in a shaft the cape chisel should be used in

the same manner as above. But in both cases it is best, when filing, to

occasionally ease out the corners with the edge of a half-round file,

for reasons which will be explained presently.

In chipping a keyway in a bore the cut must not be carried entirely

through from one side, or the metal at the end of the cut will break

out, and even in wrought iron this is apt to occur, so that it is

necessary to cut the keyway from each end, or, at least, nick it in at

one and cut it from the other end. In long key ways it is handiest to

cut them half-way from each side, using, in the absence of anything

better, a piece of planed wood and red marking or chalk to try the

keyway with.

[Illustration: Fig. 2307.]

In cutting out through keyways by hand the location of the keyway is

marked off by lines on both sides of the stub end of the rod, and then

the mass of the metal is removed by drilling through as many holes as

can be got in the size of keyway required, as shown in Fig. 2307, in

which W is the work, B C D E the location of the keyway, and 1, 2, 3, 4

are the holes, taking care to have the drill rather smaller than the

width of requisite keyway. The holes are drilled half-way through from

each side, which is done to keep the keyway true; for if the drills were

to run a little to one side, as they are apt to do from a variety of

causes, a great deal of work would be required to correct the error.

If the keyway is of sufficient dimensions to admit of the use of a

chisel, the pieces left between the drilled holes are chipped out, and

for this purpose a side chisel is found very useful, not only to nick

the sides of the pieces left by the drilling, but also to take the

finishing chipping cuts on the sides of the keyway. To cut out the

square corners of the keyway, the diamond-point chisel shown in Fig.

2171 is employed.

[Illustration: Fig. 2308.]

If, however, the keyway is a very deep one, requiring long and slight

chisels, the chipping process may be greatly reduced, or in fact

entirely dispensed with, by plugging up the holes first drilled in the

stub end by driving pieces of round iron tightly into them, and then

drilling new holes, having their centres midway between the pieces so

driven in, as at A in Fig. 2308. After the latter drilling, the

remaining pieces of plugs are driven out, leaving the centre of the

keyway cut clear through and the sides with a series of flutes in them,

as shown at B, Fig. 2308 (in which 1 2 are the plugs and A is a centre

for the new hole at that end), which should be filed away with a file as

thick or strong as the clear space will allow. These plugs must be of

the same metal as that in which the keyway is cut, otherwise the drill

will be apt to run to one side.

To insure truth in the surfaces, a surface plate to test with is an

absolute necessity, while to test the parallelism, a small sheet iron

gauge is used, which gauge may afterwards be employed as a guide whereby

to plane the thickness of the gib and key.

In cases where a slotting machine is at hand, it is sometimes the

practice to cut out one end of the keyway to a sufficient length to

admit a slotting tool, and then to slot out the remainder. This plan is

often resorted to in getting out keyways of unusually large dimensions.

A much more usual method, however, is to employ slotting or keyway

drills.

It is obvious that the ends of the keyways cut by drills are half round;

hence, if square corners are required, they must be cut out square with

the chisel shown in Fig. 2176, and afterwards filed out true. As a

general rule, keyways cut with these drills require filing on the sides

to get proper smoothness and bearing for the keys; and here it may be

remarked that, in filing the corners of the keyway, a safe-edge file

must be used, so that the two faces forming the corner will not be

operated upon simultaneously, because that would require that the file

be used in a straight line laterally as well as horizontally, and this

is impracticable even in the hands of the most skilful.

Even the square file should have a safe edge upon it, and such an edge

is usually produced by grinding the teeth off one face of the file. In

selecting the face to have the teeth ground off, choose a face that is

hollow in its length, or, if none of the faces is hollow, then select a

face that is at a right angle to a good face of the file. It will be

noted that with one safe edge only the square file will require turning

over in order to operate upon both corners and maintain in each case a

safe edge of the file against the flat sides of the keyway. For this

reason many workmen select the two best parallel faces of the file and

grind off the two other faces, giving to the file two safe edges, one

opposite to the other. In this case either of the cutting faces of the

file may be used upon the whole end face of the keyway operating close

up to the corner, or if the file is much narrower than the keyway it may

be used with a side sweep that will prevent the file from pinning, and

produce much truer filing.

It is useless to attempt to cut out a square corner with a square file

unless one edge of the latter is ground safe, because the teeth of the

file itself do not form a square corner, and it is therefore only by

grinding the teeth off one side that the points of the file teeth can be

brought full up to a sharp angle. Here, however, it may be noted that

even if the filing is performed with the best of safe-edge files, and as

carefully as possible, it will still be necessary to square out the fine

corners with the edge of a fine smooth half-round file.

If the edges of the keyways are rounding, as they are sometimes made

where strength is required in the strap, it is better to take a file

nearly or about 1/8 inch larger in diameter than the width of the

keyway, and grind two safe edges on it, otherwise the round file is very

apt to go astray and cut the sides as well as the edge of the keyway.

An equaling file is much better for keyways than one actually parallel.

[Illustration: Fig. 2309.]

Another way employed to finish small keyways is by the aid of the tools

shown in Figs. 2309 and 2310, which are termed drifts, because they are

driven through with a hand hammer. That shown in Fig. 2309 is intended

for holes having but little depth and not requiring to be very true,

such, for instance, as those cut in the ends of keyways or bolts to

receive cotters; the thickness at A A is made greater than at B C to

give the cutting edge clearance.

The form shown in Fig. 2309 is for use by hand, the teeth being cut

diagonally instead of across, as at A A, to preserve the strength. This

end may also be attained by making the serrations round at the bottom,

as shown in the figure.

[Illustration: Fig. 2310.]

The slant of the teeth on one side of the drift should cross the slant

of the teeth on the diametrally opposite side, because if the teeth on

opposite sides were parallel one to the other the drift would have a

tendency to move over to one side, and crowd there during the process of

drifting.

In using these drifts the keyway should first be filed out to very

nearly the finished size, leaving very little duty for the drift to

perform, although the drift may be driven a short distance into the

keyway occasionally during the filing, so as to show where filing is

requisite. The work must lie flat and level upon a metal block, lead

being preferable, and oil freely supplied to the drift. "If the hole is

a deep one, and the cuttings clog in the teeth, or if the cut becomes

too great (which may be detected by the drift making but little

progress, or by the blows sounding solid) the drift must be driven out

again, the cuttings removed, and the surplus metal, if any, removed by

filing. The drift must again be freely oiled, and driven in as before,

and the operation continued until the drift is driven through the

keyway. After the drift has passed once through it should be reversed

(or, if a square one, turned a quarter revolution) and again driven

through, so that each side of the drift will have cut on each side of

the hole, which is done to correct any variation in the size of the

drift" ("Complete Practical Machinist").

The great desideratum in using these drifts is to drive them true, and

to strike fair blows, otherwise they will break. While the drift is

first used, it should be examined for straightness at almost every blow;

and if it requires drawing to one side, it should be done by altering

the direction in which the hammer travels, and not by tilting the hammer

face.

[Illustration: Fig. 2311.]

In Fig. 2311, suppose A to be a piece of wood and B and C drifts which

have entered the keyways out of plumb, as shown by the dotted lines D

and E. If, to right the drift C, it was struck by the hammer F in the

position shown, and travelling in the direction denoted by G, the drift

C would be almost sure to break; but if the drift B was struck by the

hammer H, as shown, and travelling in the direction denoted by I, it

would draw the drift B upright without breaking; or, in other words, the

hammer face should always strike the head of the drift level and true

with it, the drawing of the drift, if any is required, being done by the

direction in which the hammer travels. When it is desired to cut a very

smooth hole, two or more drifts should be used, each successive one

being a trifle larger in diameter than its predecessor. Drifts slight in

cross-section or slight in proportion to their lengths would be tempered

evenly all over to a blue, while those of stout proportions would be

tempered to a deep brown, bordering upon a bright purple.

For cutting out long narrow keyways, that are too narrow to admit of a

machine cutting tool, and for very true holes, not to be cut out in

quantities all of the same dimensions, it has no equal.

[Illustration: Fig. 2312.]

Hand drifts are sometimes used to cut keyways in small bores, as in

small hubs, the method being shown in Fig. 2312, in which A represents a

pulley with a keyway to be cut in the hub _b_; _c_ is a plug, and _d_

slips of iron placed between _c_ and the drift _e_ to press the latter

to its cut. It is obvious that in this case the keyway in the pulley

will be cut parallel, and the taper must be provided for in the key seat

in the shaft. Keyways cut in this way are more true than those filed

out. It is also obvious that the sides of the keyway, as well as its

depth, may be finished by a drift, and this is very desirable (on

account of insuring parallelism) when the key is to act as a feather

that is to have contact on the sides and not bind top and bottom.

The most improved form and method of using this class of tool, however,

is as follows:--If a keyway is to be cut out of solid metal, holes are

drilled as closely together as the length of the keyway will admit,

their diameter nearly equaling the required width of keyway, after these

holes are drilled through the metal remaining between them.

TEMPLATES.--Templates for vice work are used for two purposes: first to

serve as guides in filing work to shape and size, and secondly to test

the finished work. When used as guides to file the work they are mainly

used to work of irregular, curved, or angular form, to which the square

and other ordinary vice tools cannot be applied.

Fig. 2313 represents a template for filing out a square hole. The edges

A, B are at a right angle to each other, the wire simply serving as a

handle.

There are two methods of applying this template; the first is to file

out two opposite surfaces of the hole to the required diameter, making

them true and parallel one to the other, and to then employ the template

while filing out the remaining two sides; the other is to file out one

side and apply the template from that as a base for the other sides. The

first is preferable because the liability to error is a minimum.

When work is to be from a template, the latter obviously becomes the

original standard, and in many cases the best method of forming it so as

to insure correctness and enable its proper application to the work is a

matter of great consideration. The shape of the template must, of

course, be marked by lines which should be as fine and as deep as

possible. But it does not matter how closely the template may be filed

to these lines, it will still have some error, and this can in many

cases be discovered and corrected during its application to the work. In

the following examples there are principles which will be found of

general application:--

[Illustration: Fig. 2313.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2314.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2315.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2316.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2317.]

Let it be required to make or test a piece of work such as in Fig. 2314,

the teeth to be equally spaced, of the same angle, and of equal height.

A template must be made of one of the two forms shown in Fig. 2315. To

begin with, take a piece of sheet metal equal in width to at least two

teeth, and, assuming that the template is to have two teeth, file its

sides P Q, in Fig. 2316, parallel, and make the width equal to twice the

pitch of the teeth. We next divide its width into four equal parts by

lines, and mark the height, as shown in Fig. 2316. If we desire to make

the template such as at A, we cut out the shaded portion; or for the

template at B, the shaded portion. It will be observed, however, that in

template A there are two corners C and D to be filed out, while at B

there is but one E, the latter being the easier to make, since the

corners are the most difficult to file and keep true. The best method of

producing such a corner is to grind the teeth off the convex side and at

the edge of a half-round file, producing a sharper corner than the teeth

possess, while giving at the same time a safe edge on the rounded side

that will not cut one angle while the other is being filed. But when we

come to apply these templates to the work, we shall find that A is the

better of the two, because we can apply the square S, Fig. 2317, to the

outside of the template, and also to the edge F of the work, which

cannot be done to the edges G of the work and H of the template, because

the template edge overhangs. We can, however, apply a square S´ to the

other edge of B, but this is not so convenient unless the tops of the

teeth are level.

[Illustration: Fig. 2318.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2319.]

Assuming, therefore, that the template A is the one to be made, we

proceed to test its accuracy, bearing in mind that for this purpose the

same method is to be employed whatever shape the template may be.

Consequently, we make from the male template A, Fig. 2318, a female

template K, beginning at one end of K and filing it to fit A until the

edges of A and K are in line when tested by a straight-edge S. We then

move the template A one tooth to the right, and file another tooth in K,

and proceed in this way until a number of teeth have been made, applying

a square as at S, Fig. 2319, to see that the template A is kept upright

upon K. When K has been thus provided with several teeth that would fit

A in any position in which the latter may be placed, we must turn

template A around upon K to test the equality of the angles. Thus,

suppose at the first filing the edges _a_, _b_, _c_, _d_, upon A

accurately fit the template K, and the straight-edge shows the edges

fair; then if we simply turn the template A around, its angles, which

were before on the right, will now be on the left, as is shown at the

right of Fig. 2318. Thus in one position _a_ fits to _e_, in the other

it fits to _h_, or _b_ fits to _f_, and when turned around it fits to

_g_, and so on. Supposing that when thus turned around the angles do not

coincide, then half the error will be in the teeth of A and one-half in

those of K, and the best plan will be to correct them on A to the

necessary amount as near as judgment will dictate, and then to apply K

as before, continuing this process until A will fit anywhere in K, and

may be turned around without showing any error. But at each correction

the straight-edge must be applied, and finally should be tried to prove

if the teeth tops are level. We thus have two interchangeable templates,

of which A may be used on the work and K kept to correct A when the

latter becomes worn. It may be as well to add, however, that in first

applying A to K it is best to press the straight-edge S against the edge

of K, and hold it there, and then to place A against S, and slide it

down into K.

[Illustration: Fig. 2320.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2321.]

Fig. 2320 represents an example in which, the form being a curve, it

would be best to have the template touch more than two teeth, as shown

in the cut. By letting the side A, Fig. 2321, of the template T

terminate at the centre line of the two curves, and the end B terminate

at the top of a curve, turning the template around would cause end A to

envelop side C of the middle curve, thus increasing the scope of the

template. Suppose, however, that the base curve D required to be true

with the teeth, then a second template T´ must be used, its ends at E

and F measuring an equal length or height, so that when they are placed

even with the ends of the work, the distances G H being equal, the

corrugations will be true to the curve D D. Now let it be supposed that,

instead of making a template to test a piece of work such as in Fig.

2321, it is required to make a template for use in making another piece

of work that is to fit to piece W, then template T in Fig. 2321 will not

answer, because it is a female template, whereas a male one is required,

so that the edge of the template may coincide with that of the work. But

we may convert T, Fig. 2321, into a male template by simply cutting off

the edge A as far as the line J, and causing its right-hand edge to

coincide with the edge of the work so that the latter, after being

fitted to the template, may be turned upside down and fit upon the piece

of work.

[Illustration: Fig. 2322.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2323.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2324.]

In Fig. 2323 is an example in which the forms of both sides of a piece

require to be exactly alike, and the easiest method of accomplishing

this is as follows:--The face A should first be made true, and face B

made parallel to A. A centre line C may then be drawn, and from it the

lines E, E may be marked. The lines D are then drawn parallel to A A,

lines E being made square to D and to A. The sides E may be calipered to

width and parallelism, and all that will then remain is to file the

angles F, F and the ends G, G to their required lengths. For F, F all

that is necessary is a template formed as in Fig. 2324. The object of

dressing the ends G, G last is that if they were finished before, their

faces E would have to be made at exactly correct distances from them,

which would render the job considerably more difficult.

[Illustration: Fig. 2325.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2326.]

Fig. 2325 represents a sketch for a piece of work whose two sides are to

be shaped exactly alike, requiring a template of the form of the work,

as shown. From this a second template, Fig. 2326, is made, and to this

latter the work may be filed. To make the template in Fig. 2325, which

represents the work, the edge _x_ _x_ must be made straight, and the edge

D parallel to it at the proper height. A centre line S is then marked,

and the edges at E may be filed equidistant from S and square to D;

hence they will be parallel to each other. The side sections F should

then be filed equidistant from S and parallel to each other. They should

be the proper width apart and square to D, being tested in each of

these respects. The line joining E and F should be left full, as

denoted by the dotted line at A on the right. The edges at C, C should

then be filed, calipering them from the edge _x_ _x_. Edges G, G are

obviously equidistant from S and parallel to S, or, what is the same

thing, at a right angle to _x_ _x_, from which they may therefore be

tested with a square, and, finally, the edges B are made parallel to _x_

_x_, and the ends H made square to _x_ and equidistant from S. We have

now to file the angular groove at A, and to get this true after marking

its depth from the lines at A, we file it first to the lines as near as

may be by the eye and very nearly to the full depth. We then make a

small supplemental male template T, Fig. 2327, equal in width to the

distance E F, or, in other words, to the width of the step at A, and

having its edges quite parallel. Its end is then filed to fit the groove

at A, when its edge meets and coincides with edge E, as in Fig. 2327, T

representing the supplemental template. It is clear that when the

[V]-groove A is so filed that T will fit it with either of its edges

against E, the angles of the groove will be alike, and we may then make

a male gauge, as in Fig. 2326, that may be used to mark or line out the

work and to use as a template to file it to, its edge H being kept

parallel to face D, Fig. 2325, of the work.

[Illustration: Fig. 2327.]

CHAPTER XXVII.--VICE WORK--(_Continued_).

[Illustration: Fig. 2328.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2329.]

There are two principal kinds of connecting rods, first those in which

the brasses fit in spaces provided in the solid rod, and which are known

as solid-ended connecting rods, and second those in which the brasses

fit in a strap secured by bolts or keys to the end of the rod. In Fig.

2328 is shown the simplest form of solid-end connecting rod. It consists

of a rod enlarged at its end to receive a brass held up to the journal

by a set-screw as shown, one-half the bore being provided in the rod and

one-half in the brass. The objection to this kind of rod is that as the

bore wears the rod gets shorter and no means is provided to restore its

length, and that during the pulling stroke of the rod the whole of the

strain is concentrated on the end area of the set-screw, and this causes

it to imbed in the brass, giving play to the brass unless frequent

adjustment is made. It is, therefore, difficult to readily maintain a

very accurate adjustment of fit with a simple set-screw of this kind.

This may be to some extent remedied by the construction shown in Fig.

2329 in which the half brass A threads upon the stem of the rod, so that

when it wears shorter to the amount of half the pitch of the thread upon

the rod end, the brass may be unscrewed half a turn, and the original

length will be restored. The cap is held on by two screws, which may

have slotted heads as shown, or screws with check-nuts to prevent the

screws from slackening back, as all screws are apt to do that receive

alternating strains in reverse directions.

[Illustration: Fig. 2330.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2331.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2332.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2333.]

Yet another simple form of solid-end connecting rod is shown in Fig.

2330, there being two brasses with a key on one side and a set-screw on

the other. In this case, as soon as either brass is moved by the key it

can fit the rod at the top and at the bottom only; hence there is but

little to hold the brasses sideways in the rod, and furthermore the

brasses are damaged from the key and the set-screw acting directly upon

them, as will be explained with reference to strap-ended rods. In Fig.

2333 is shown a very substantial form of solid-ended rod, a sectional

view being shown in Fig. 2331. The bottom or back brass A has a flange,

as shown in Figs. 2331 and 2332 at A, which secures it to the rod end at

the back. The top or key brass B has the keyway partly sunk in it, and

the key binds against one side as well as on the bottom of the keyway,

and this draws that brass close down to the face of the rod, as shown in

Fig. 2331.

In this as in all other connecting rods in which one edge of the key

beds against the back of the brass, the taper for the key should be cut

in the rod so that the edge which meets the brass will stand square

across the opening for the brass; in this way the back of the brass will

also stand square across, which is easier to mark off and cut, plane,

and fit. If the taper for the key is cut on the brass, marking the

latter and fitting it become more difficult, as it must be put in and

out of its place to fit and bed the taper for the key edge, whereas, in

the other case, it can be squared with a square while planing and

fitting. As the bore of connecting-rod brasses wears, and the lost

motion incident thereto is taken up (by driving in the key) the location

of the brasses in the rod end is altered, making the rod longer or

shorter according to the location of the key. But when this wear has

been sufficient to let the key pass through the rod, slips of iron

termed liners are inserted between the backs or bedding faces of the

brasses and the end of the rod or crown of the strap, as the case may

be. In putting in these liners the location of the brasses in the rod

end may be adjusted so as to bring the brass back to its original

position and restore the rod to its proper length, and in doing so the

back brass, as distinguished from the key brass, is the one to be lined

first.

[Illustration: Fig. 2333.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2334.]

In the rod ends shown in Figs. 2333 and 2334 the joint faces (that is

the faces where the brasses meet) must be filed away to take up the

wear, hence the rods get shorter. In Fig. 2333 the liner may be placed

behind either brass, A or B, or behind both, the thickness of that

behind A adjusting the length of the rod (which is always measured from

centre to centre of the respective brass bores), while the thickness of

that placed behind B would simply act to prevent the key from passing so

far through the keyway. To prevent as far as possible the wear from

altering the length of the rod, the key at one end of the rod is placed

outside the crank pin or at the outer end of the rod, as in Fig. 2333,

while at the other end it is placed between the brasses and the stem of

the rod, as in Fig. 2334. In this latter case the thickness of liner

placed behind the key brass B (as the brass against which the key bears,

or the brass next to the key, is always termed) would adjust the length

of the rod, while the thickness of liner placed behind the back brass

(as the other brass is termed) would be the one to adjust the distance

the key would pass through the keyway.

[Illustration: Fig. 2335.]

In this form of rod end, as in many other solid-ended rods, the flange

or collar of the crank pin, if solid with the pin, requires to pass

through the opening in the rod end which receives the brasses. This may

be accomplished by making that opening large or wide enough to pass over

the crank-pin collar (which will increase the width of the brasses, and

hence that of the rod end); or else the crank-pin collar may have two

flat places filed on it, as in the end view shown in Fig. 2335. The

objection to this plan is that the rod can only be taken on and off in

one position of the engine; that is, when the two flat places A and B,

Fig. 2335, stand parallel with the length of the rod.

[Illustration: Fig. 2336.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2337.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2338.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2339.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2340.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2341.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2342.]

It will be noticed in Fig. 2331 that the brass B does not fill the space

in the rod. This is because that brass has to pass in over crank-pin

collar and push up into the journal after it is in the rod. To make this

space as small as possible, and to enable giving the crank pin as large

a collar as possible, the key brass is sometimes beveled off, as shown

in Fig. 2336 at A B. Another form of this rod end is shown in Fig. 2336,

in which there are two keys to the brasses, the object being to adjust

the keys to maintain the rod of its proper length. In order to

facilitate making this adjustment, there should always be upon the face

of the rod end centrepunch marks, as shown in Fig. 2338 at F and G, or

else two deep marks, as shown at C D in Fig. 2337. Then, in lining up

the brasses to set the key back, the rod may be restored to its original

length by putting behind the back brass a piece of metal of such

thickness as will bring the centre of the bore of the back brass B even

with the centrepunch or other marks. This being the case, it does not

matter about the exact thickness of the piece of metal put behind the

other brass, since a variation in that will only act to let the key come

more or less through the rod end without affecting the length of the

rod. In Fig. 2337 is shown a form of rod end sometimes used. The end

being open, the brasses pass through it. In this case the whole strain

of the pull of the rod falls upon the edge of the gib at top and bottom

of the strap, causing the gib to wear out very fast; furthermore, the

back brass condenses the metal at the back of the brass opening, acting

to pene it and throw the points of the rod end open, which it always

does, the jaws of the gib imbedding in the jaws of the rod. This opening

of the rod jaws makes the brasses loose in their places; hence this is a

weak and undesirable form of rod end, though very convenient to take on

and off. In Figs. 2338, 2339, 2340, and 2341 is shown a form of

solid-ended rod of more modern construction. In this case a wedge A is

used instead of a key, being adjusted by screws passing through the rod

at the top and bottom, it being obvious that the set-screws may have

check-nuts added. B is the back brass, and C the key brass. In this case

the flange of the brass goes next to the crank pin, and a plate D is

provided to serve as a flange on the front face of the brass. In Fig.

2338 this plate is removed to show the wedge A; but it is shown in the

plan view, 2339, and the end view, 2340, and by itself in Fig. 2341. A

groove is cut on each side of the two brasses and the plate spans the

brasses, passing up the groove being held in position by a screw at E.

The opening for the brass (in the rod end) is here shown wide enough for

the rod end to pass over the collar of the crank pin, but in many cases,

with this as well as with other forms of solid-ended rods, the crank pin

may be made plain--that is, without a flange--and have a washer secured

by a screw, so that by removing the washer the rod may be put on with

the brasses already in place, and made no thicker (at the joint face)

than is necessary for strength. In Fig. 2342 is shown what may be termed

a clip-end connecting rod, the screw closing the rod end (to take up the

wear) against the spring of the metal. It is obvious that in this case

the hole may receive a brass bush split as is the rod end and secured

from turning by a pin. Fig. 2343 presents another form of solid-end rod,

which admits of the use of a brass having a flange on both sides of the

strap, and will take on and off by removing the cap B. If the crank-pin

collar is solid, the brasses must be placed on the crank pin, and the

rod, with the wedge in place, lifted or lowered to the brasses; but if

the crank pin has a washer and bolt, the rod may be put together and

slipped on its place.

A compromise between the solid and the strap-rod end is shown in Fig.

2344, which represents a design used upon the fast engines of the

Pennsylvania Railway. The piece A takes out to enable putting on the

rod or taking it off, A being secured in position by the bolt and nuts

shown. This forms a solid and durable rod that is much less costly to

make than strap-ended rods.

[Illustration: Fig. 2343.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2344.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2345.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2346.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2347.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2348.]

The simplest form of strap-ended connecting rod is that shown in Fig.

2345; S is the strap, secured to the rod end by the key D and gib C. A

is the top, and B the bottom, or crown brass, and E the set-screw for

securing the key in its place. [When the rod ends are forged in separate

pieces, to be afterwards welded to the stem of the rod after the strap

brasses are fitted up (which is done for convenience in handling them

while fitting them up), they are termed stub ends.] This form of rod

affords great facility for connection with the journals as the strap is

easily removed. As the strap, however, is only secured to the rod by the

gib and key, and as these have a small amount of area on the sides, it

is not unusual to employ two gibs and one key, as in Fig. 2346, which

holds the strap more securely, and more effectually prevents its

movement sideways upon the rod end. In rods in which gibs and keys alone

are used to hold the strap to the rod, the strap moves along the rod as

the key passes farther through the strap, and the fit of the strap to

the rod must be easy enough to permit of this motion; hence it cannot be

locked to the rod. This, however, may be done by the employment of a

bolt as well as a gib and key, as is shown in Fig. 2347. The edge of the

gib here abuts against the back of the top brass, or key brass, as it is

sometimes termed, which is objectionable, inasmuch as that it is apt to

indent the brass, as shown in Fig. 2348 at B. This causes the bore to

close at A, and causes the journal to heat, while it makes the brass fit

loosely between the jaws of the strap, because it stretches the metal at

the back of the brass, which has the same effect as pening it with the

hammer.

In Fig. 2349 is shown an end of a connecting rod, such as is employed on

American locomotives, the use of a gib being dispensed with, and the

strap being held by two bolts. To prevent the edge of the key from

imbedding in the brass, a piece of hardened steel is sometimes placed

between the key and the brass, as shown in the figure.

In some designs this method is reversed, the gib being prolonged in a

screw-thread, as shown in Fig. 2350, and the key head is carried over as

shown. Two wing nuts are provided for adjusting the key, which enables

its adjustment without the employment of a wrench or hammer.

To prevent the end of the set-screw from raising a burr on the key,

which would prevent its easy motion through the keyway, a shallow groove

is sometimes cut along the key, as in Fig. 2351 at A, the end of the

set-screw binding on the bottom of that groove.

In other forms of rod a gib and key are used as well as two bolts. This

not only holds the strap very firmly, but it prevents to a certain

extent the pening of the back of the brass, explained with reference to

Fig. 2348. It is obvious that in the absence of a gib the key moving

under friction against the brass stretches the metal more than a gib

that presses against the brass, but has no motion endways.

[Illustration: Fig. 2350.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2351.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2352.]

In Fig. 2352 the strap is held by bolts having nuts at each end, instead

of a solid head at one end and nuts at the other. The single nuts at the

top serve to draw the bolts out when the rod is to be taken apart, thus

saving the use of the hammer for that purpose.

[Illustration: Fig. 2353.]

In Fig. 2353 is shown a form of rod in which the strap is held by two

dies A B, and a bolt which passes through the strap, the dies, and the

rod end.

[Illustration: Fig. 2354.]

In Fig. 2354 is a form of rod end in which the strap ends are keyed

against abutments on the rod by means of the key A. The abutments and

strap ends being bevelled, keying up the strap with A closes it down

upon the rod.

[Illustration: Fig. 2355.]

In Fig. 2355 is a form of rod end largely used upon marine engine work;

A is the end of the rod, B, B the brasses, and D, D bolts passing

through the brasses. Here we have no means of correcting the alteration

of length due to the wear, unless a line is marked on the rod end, as at

C, and the distance that line should stand from the centre of the brass

bore is marked beside it, as is denoted by the figure in the cut,

indicating that the line should stand 9 inches from the cuts of the

brass bore.

In general practice the inside jaw faces of connecting rod straps and

the faces of the rod are made parallel, which serves very well when the

duty and wear is not great; but when the wear and tear is great, as in

locomotive work, it is much better to make them taper; indeed, they are

in any event better taper, because in that case the brasses can be made

a tighter fit. The reason for making them parallel is because they can

be more readily planed so than taper; but a parallel strap is more

difficult to fit, and cannot be made so good a fit as a taper one, even

when new, while it is very much more difficult and expensive to repair.

[Illustration: Fig. 2356.]

When the faces of the stub end (or, more properly speaking, of the

block) are parallel one to the other, and the inside faces of the strap

are also parallel, the strap must be made a very easy fit to the block,

in order to be an equal fit from end to end; for if the strap fits as

tightly as it should to be a good job, it will, when put on the rod,

spring open, fitting across A, Fig. 2356, only; this because the strap

springs open from contact at A. The fit, then, can only be such as will

not have force enough to spring the strap open, and this is very small

indeed even in a very strong strap. It is within the mark to state that

in a strap measuring 4 inches between jaws, at A in Fig. 2356, it can be

forced by hand on the rod sufficiently tight to spring them open 1/16th

of an inch at B, B. When the brasses are fitted into the strap a second

difficulty arises, inasmuch as they must be made a very easy fit, or

else they will spring the strap open so that it will neither fit at A

nor at B, whereas it is desirable that the bottom brass drive home, and

the top brass, or one nearest the rod, just push home by hand.

When the rod requires repairing a more serious difficulty arises.

Suppose, for example, that the strap requires refitting to the rod, then

it must evidently be closed between the jaws, especially if the rod end

requires filing up, as it usually does. Now the jaws being parallel

cannot be closed without being taken to the blacksmith shop and closed

across the crown, as at A in Fig. 2357; for if the jaws are closed (as

they might be) by pening the corners B, C the jaws would close as

denoted by the dotted lines. The brasses will have to be made larger

than the diameter at D, in order to fill the space at A, and will be an

easier fit as they pass from D to A, whereas the opposite should be the

case. The strap must therefore be closed across A in the blacksmith's

fire; this will scale the crown end and render it necessary to file down

the whole of the surface on each of the side faces of the strap and rod

in order to make them parallel, as they must be to have the flanges of

the brasses fit when home in the strap.

[Illustration: Fig. 2357.]

The blacksmithing will in most cases render it necessary to file out the

keyways, and this again entails the making of a new gib and key. All

this extra work may be avoided by making the block and strap a little

taper. But before proving this it may be noted that when the rod is made

parallel the strap may be made to fit tightly by making the jaws taper,

as shown by dotted lines in Fig. 2357; so that when the strap is on the

rod, and the jaws spring open by reason of the close fit, the fitting

surfaces will be parallel. Such a construction would be faulty however,

for the brasses would fit too tight when entering the strap, and get

easier as they passed to their places, whereas, as already stated, the

exact opposite should be the case.

[Illustration: Fig. 2358.]

Let us now observe the advantages of a strap, whose inside faces are

made as in Fig. 2358; smaller at A than at B, and also at C than at D,

while the thickness from A to B is greater than that from C to D, while

the widths C D are less than the corresponding width of the rod.

First, as to fitting the strap to the rod. It may be made so tight to

the rod that it will only just pass on when pushed by the hand.

Second, this will render possible a tighter fit than would be possible

with a parallel strap and rod.

Third, the width B A being taper, the brasses may be easier made a good

fit, because there will be some metal to fit on after they enter at B.

Fourth, the brasses may be made a tighter fit, the bottom brass being

tight enough to spring the strap a trifle, easing but not destroying its

fit on the rod.

Fifth, the top brass may be made a handsliding fit to the strap without

springing the strap open, which being already under a tension because of

the spring due to the bottom brass, will be more rigid and permit of a

tighter degree of top brass fit, without springing open and away from

the rod.

Sixth, this will leave the bottom brass a tight driving fit, and the top

a hand sliding fit, which is desirable, because the top brass has to be

taken out to get the rod off while the bottom brass remains in its

place.

[Illustration: Fig. 2359.]

Seventh, what is of more consequence than all, the strap can be more

easily and cheaply refitted to repair it. Thus, in Fig. 2359, suppose

the strap to have been closed by pening at D; then whether the end D

will be narrowed will depend on the amount the strap was closed, and the

amount of taper it had before closing. Let us take, however, the most

unfavorable conditions, and suppose that the amount of taper was so

small, and the amount of closing by pening so great, that the jaws were

made taper and smallest at D. Then the amount to be filed off to bring

the width of jaw correct, and a fit to the strap, will be less than if

the strap jaws were formed as in Fig. 2357, as will be seen by comparing

Fig. 2357 with Fig. 2359, the amount to be filed away being that between

the dotted and the full lines in both figures; the amount of closure

being the same in the two figures.

But there is another great advantage, inasmuch as in pening, the strap

may be pened and tried on the rod, the strap being pened and tried

alternately until the required fit is obtained, which is not practicable

with upsetting in the blacksmith's shop.

Again, the keyways in the strap will not be set out of true with those

in the rod, as they are apt to be when upsetting is resorted to, nor

will the strap be scaled; hence the side faces will require but little

filing.

Furthermore the step may be located so as to come against the rod end

when the wear has let the key down, and this will prevent the strap from

passing too far upon the rod, and, therefore, tend to prevent the rod

length from being improperly altered from errors in the thickness of the

liners placed behind the brasses to take up the wear.

FITTING UP CONNECTING RODS.--The method of fitting up a connecting rod

depends entirely upon its size. Very small rods to be made in numbers

are usually got out by means of special devices which leave the fitter

but little to do; indeed, sometimes the machine work is so accurately

and finely fitted and finished as to finish the rod without the aid of

the vice hand, save to put it into its place upon the engine or machine.

As, however, the dimensions of the rod increase, this method of

manipulation is in practice departed from, and the filing, fitting, and

adjusting operations increase. In any event, however, the principles to

be observed in the manipulation are the same, because the points to be

observed in the fitting by hand work must be accomplished by the machine

if the rods are to be finished by machine work.

Let Fig. 2360 represent a connecting rod; A representing the centre line

in the side, and F the centre line in the edge view, and it is obvious

that the axial lines, B and C, of the brass bores must stand at a right

angle to line F, and be parallel to each other, because the journals on

which they fit will do so. Furthermore, the faces of the brasses, as E,

must stand their proper distance from the centre line F, this distance

being at each end respectively half the whole width D, and the faces E

must be in the same plane whatever their widths may be. The centre lines

A and F are imaginary lines not worked to (except it be in marking or

lining the rod out for the planing operations); but the method employed

to fit up the rod must be such as will make all parts true to those

lines if they were tested by them.

The process of fitting up a connecting rod may be tersely stated as

follows: 1st, the rod is planed; 2nd, the straps are planed; 3rd, the

straps are fitted to the rods; 4th, the straps are drilled and bolted to

the rod; 5th, the keyways are cut, and the keys and gibs fitted; 6th,

the side faces of the rod ends are again planed with the straps on; 7th,

the brasses are fitted and the rods marked off for length and the

brasses bored; and, 8th, the file finishing and polishing done.

[Illustration: Fig. 2360.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2361.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2362.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2363.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2364.]

In the case of very large rods the two ends are made and fitted up as

separate pieces, and are afterwards welded to the body or stem of the

rod, and the setting of the ends true one to the other after the welding

affords such an excellent insight into the alignment of rods that it may

be well to describe it. First, then, the rod being laid on its side, two

straight-edges, or rather winding strips, S and S´, Fig. 2361, are

placed on the side faces, and the rod will be set in this direction when

their ends A, B, C, D, appear parallel when sighted by the eye. If the

winding strips are adjusted to stand straight across the rod, and,

therefore, parallel one to the other, any twist or wind in the two rod

faces will be very plainly discernible by the sighting process. The rod

is then stood on edge, as in Fig. 2362, to test the alignment of the

side faces. A straight-edge S is pressed firmly against one of the

faces, as H in the figure, with the other end elevated as shown. The

elevated end is then lowered, the motion serving to keep the end fairly

bedded against face H. The distance, I J, Fig. 2363, is then measured.

The straight-edge is then used in the same manner on the other side of

the rod as at S in the figure, and the distance K L is measured, the

setting in this direction being correct when distances I J and J K are

equal. The straight-edge is then applied to the edge faces of end H of

the rod, as in Fig. 2364, at M and at N, the distances O, P, are made

equal. During these operations a straight-edge is applied along the body

of the rod to see where to set it to effect any required adjustment, and

if that body is straight the adjustment is made near the end at which

the straight-edge is pressed to the rod.

The setting of the small end I is effected in the same manner, but the

straight-edge will in this case fall over the face at the larger end, as

is shown in Fig. 2365; hence, instead of measuring, lines as G and T are

marked coincident with the edge of the straight-edge and the distances

T U, I G, are made equal. Winding strips are applied to the edge faces

as well as to the side faces, and as making one adjustment or alignment

may alter another, the whole process must be repeated until the whole of

the tests prove the setting to be true.

[Illustration: Fig. 2365.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2366.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2367.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2368.]

Now suppose the rod to have been forged solid and all these faces to

have been made true in the planing, and the first operation is to fit

the straps to the rod ends. The strap should be put in place on the rod

and moved laterally, when the centre of its motion where it moves the

least will be the place where it binds and therefore requires filing. If

its side faces come atwist with the side faces of the rod end, as shown

in section in Fig. 2366, either the faces of the rod end or the inside

faces of the jaw are out of square as denoted by the dotted lines. In

any event the face E, Fig. 2367, of the rod end should be surfaced true

and made at a right angle to the side face, and if to be made parallel

to M, also at a right angle to K, a square and a surface plate are used

to test them. If the diameter J is to be smaller than that at H, then

the angle of both face E, and its opposite, should be equal with

reference to K. These faces should be finished by draw-filing, with the

file marks lengthwise of the rod. To fit the strap, proceed as follows:

To find where it requires filing, place it on the rod (having previously

put red marking on the rod end), and move it endwise and sideways,

observing where the least motion takes place when the strap is moved

sideways by pressing its crown end, for this point of least motion is

always where it fits the tightest. To test the jaw faces for being

square apply a straight-edge S, and a square P, Fig. 2368, pressing S

against the strap, and P firmly against S.

[Illustration: Fig. 2369.]

When the strap shows to bed well on the rod and its motion is an ambling

one (and not a pivoted one), it fits properly, and if both rod and strap

have been filed square, their side faces will come fair or even. The

keyways being drilled, may then if necessary be filed out, for which

purpose it is necessary to bolt the strap to the rod, a process that

requires very skilful treatment, because if the tightening of the bolts

moves the strap on the rod, or if the strap be moved on the rod after

the clamp is tightened, the keyways will not come fair when the clamp is

taken off. In Fig. 2369 the strap is shown held to the rod by plates C

and bolts B, the rod being shown in position ready to file out the

keyway. It is better, however, to let the side face of the rod stand

vertical as the strap will stand steadier that way. The strap should be

set fair with the outside faces, which will bring the keyway fair if it

is properly located. The bolt nuts should be tightened gradually, first

one a little and then another, going over all four once or twice before

they are fully tightened, and if the strap is not fair when they are all

tight, all must be loosened before the strap is adjusted, or the clamp

pressure will cause the strap jaws to spring out of true, and the

keyways will not come fair when the clamp is removed.

Should the keyways not come fair when the strap sets fair on the rod the

strap may be set to accommodate the keyways, and thus save filing, but

this must be done before clamping it to the rod end. Care must, however,

be taken to see if cutting the strap out to suit the keyway may not

leave too little metal on one side of the keyway when the strap is

subsequently planed.

The sides of the keyway should be filed true to a surface plate, using a

well-bellied file and as stout a one as possible, so that it may not

bend under the pressure, and file away the edges of the keyway.

The keyway should be made parallel to the side face of the strap, so

that it may be fair with the centre line F in Fig. 2360. It should be

made of equal width throughout, a piece of iron being used as a gauge in

place of the key, and this same piece of sheet iron will serve as a

gauge to plane the keys to thickness.

The corners of the keyway, if to be made square, should be filed out

with the corner of a smooth half-round file, because the corners even of

safe-edge files do not come up sharp enough.

For filing out the end faces of rectangular keyways, a square file with

both edges safe must be used, the safe edges being on opposite sides of

the file. For roughing out, a taper square, but for finishing, a

parallel, or equalizing file is preferable.

The next operation is to fit the keys and gibs. The key should first be

fitted and should be filed true to a surface plate, for in no other way

can a really good reliable gib be obtained, no matter how well the keys

may have been planed or milled. It should be filed a tight fit to the

keyway so that it may be used (with a light coat of red marking) to show

tight places in the keyway, driving the key in for that purpose from

first one and then the other end of the keyway. If, however, it is

driven too forcibly, it may seize or cut, and it will be difficult to

get it out, besides damaging both it and the keyway. When the keys are

reduced so that they will drive lightly into the keyway, they should be

tried in the rod and in the strap separately, moving the key laterally

or edgeways, so that it may mark any high places in the keyway of either

of them.

The finished key and gib should be left tight enough, that they will

hold themselves in any position in the keyway of the strap or of the rod

when standing vertical.

[Illustration: Fig. 2370.]

The head of the gib should be chamfered as in Fig. 2370, so that it may

be driven in and out to fit without raising burrs which would prevent it

from passing into the keyway, and the key should be similarly chamfered

and rounded in its width.

[Illustration: Fig. 2371.]

The width of the key and gib should be such as to just fill the key

ways, leaving no draw when the key is down in the keyway so that its

head is level with the head of the gib, as in Fig. 2371, A equaling the

keyway width; and their edges should bed fairly one against the other,

and against the edges of the keyway. The strap must then be keyed upon

the rod, and the side faces of the rod and strap planed to thickness,

placing a bolt and nut in the rod end in place of the brasses, so that

the key may lock the strap and bind it in position. The rod end should

be planed to thickness for the brasses and of equal thickness on each

side of the keyway. The brasses should be planed after the rod end is

planed to thickness. The width for the brasses should be measured while

the strap is on the rod end, because the width between the jaws of the

strap is greater when the strap is in place on the rod end than when it

is off, because in order to make the strap jaws a tight fit to the rod

end it is made narrower between the jaws than the width of the rod end,

so that the jaws spring open when the strap is pushed on the rod end.

The sizes for the brasses to be planed to will then be the width of the

strap across its edge face, and the width of the strap between the jaws

_when it is on the rod_; and for these sizes a wire gauge should be

made; or an adjustable gauge may of course be set.

The method to be pursued in planing the brasses is an important

consideration. It is most convenient to plane both the brasses together,

by which means much time is saved. To obtain this end the brasses are

sometimes cast together, as in Fig. 2372, and after planing and before

boring are cut in two at the narrow section A. In this case the brasses

are cast sufficiently wide from crown to crown as denoted by B to allow

for the length cut away in separating them. In other practice the joint

faces of the brasses are faced first and then soldered together for the

planing; but very large brasses are planed separately. In either case

the joint face of the brass should be made at a right angle to the faces

of the brass that fit the strap.

[Illustration: Fig. 2372.]

The brasses should be fitted separately to the strap, and hence should,

if joined, be separated, being cut in two in a shaper, if of the form

shown in Fig. 2372, and split by driving a keen chisel between the

corners of the joint faces, if the latter have been soldered. The back

or crown brass, and not the key brass, should be fitted first. The

corners of the ways, in the brass, for the strap should be eased just

clear with the edge of a smooth half-round file, because otherwise they

will rub down the sharp edges of the strap, and make the strap jaws

appear to be a bad fit when on the rod. The brass should be driven in

and out of the strap to fit, using a block of wood to strike on,

otherwise the skin of the bore may become pened, and when the brasses

are bored they will close in at the sides and become loose in the strap.

[Illustration: Fig. 2373.]

As a guide when fitting the bottom brass in the strap, place the strap

on the rod as in Fig. 2373, and take the measure of the strap at A A,

the strap overlapping the rod to admit the calipers or gauge. Each time

the brass is driven in the strap to try the fit, the calipers so set

should be tried in the strap (the brass being in the strap), as in the

figure, and when the calipers very nearly touch the strap jaws, the

strap with the back brass still in should be tried on the rod end, or in

the case of a very heavy strap the caliper measurement minutely taken

may be relied on to show that the brass does not spring the strap jaws

too wide open. It is better, however, to leave the brasses a little too

tight in the strap as they close slightly in the boring, becoming easier

in the strap.

[Illustration: Fig. 2374.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2375.]

After the brass has been tried in the strap, and before it is filed

again, it should be tried with a square, using a straight-edge also if

the square back is too short to cross both faces of the brass. The

method of testing is shown in Fig. 2374, in which B represents the

brass, S the square, and T the straight-edge. The inside face of the

flange should also be tried as in Fig. 2375, in which P represents the

surface plate, S the square, and B the brass. This will insure that the

brass face joint is square as it should be, and is further necessary

because the bearing marks on the brass are not to be altogether relied

upon.

[Illustration: Fig. 2376.]

In Fig. 2376, for example, the brass is shown in section in the strap,

and the side A of the brass has a bearing against the jaw B of the

strap, and hence would show marks of contact. The succeeding blows in

driving the brass, however, may cause the brass to have contact on the

side C with the jaw D; hence the bearing marks would show the brass to

fit well when such was not the case. This may be detected by striking

the brass on its joint face, and then measuring from E and from F to the

end of the strap, and then striking the joint face at F and again

measuring both distances, when any canting of the brass will readily be

detected. It is better, however, to also apply the square, as shown in

Figs. 2374 and 2375, because by this means the joint faces E F being

parallel to the crown face G of the brass, the brass will be fitted so

that when G meets the crown face H of the strap, the two will be

parallel to each other and require but little filing to fit or bed

together.

The crown of the brass should be bedded very finely to the strap, or it

will spring the strap jaws away from the rod when the key is driven

home.

Suppose, for example, that the crown of the brass did not bed well at A

in Fig. 2377, then keying up the strap would spring its jaws away from

the rod end, as shown at B C, the least error in the bedding having this

effect notwithstanding the fit of the gib jaws.

[Illustration: Fig. 2377.]

The second brass must be made to just fit the strap when the back brass

is in its place, and is small enough when the calipers, set as shown in

Fig. 2373, and tried as shown in Fig. 2376, just fit the strap. This

will insure that both brasses fit the strap when it is in its place on

the rod.

When both pairs of brasses have been fitted to their straps, the latter

should (if held by bolts) be bolted to their places on the rod, and the

centre of the respective spaces for the brasses will be the location for

the marks G, G, Fig. 2360. A pair of trammels should, however, be set to

the proper length of the rod and these marks tested. If the strap is

held by gibs and keys, as in the small end in Fig. 2360, the strap

should be put on its place with the gibs in, and drawn up the rod by

slowly forcing the key in until the mark G at that end stands in its

proper distance from G at the other end, at which time the key should

come through its proper distance.

The thickness of the brasses must be measured from these marks G, G to

the crowns of the straps and the ends of the rod respectively. If the

rod is of its proper length and the straps are in their proper

positions, these marks will come in the centre of the space for the

brasses. If, however, there is any error, as there is apt sometimes to

be in very large rods, the course to be pursued depends upon the kind of

rod end. If both straps are bolted to the rod end, the error may be

divided equally at each end. If one end has a key and gib or gibs, but

no bolt, as at the small end in Fig. 2360, the key brass may be made of

such thickness as to butt against the end of the rod and meet the mark

G.

[Illustration: Fig. 2378.]

For the large end, the thickness of the key brass, or, in other words,

the distance D in Fig. 2378, must be taken after the face of the crown

brass has been squared up, as described with reference to Figs. 2374 and

2375, the connecting rod strap being placed in such position that the

key will be up in its proper place.

When the joint faces of brasses do not meet, but are left open to take

up the wear, it is a difficult matter to properly adjust the brass bore

to the journal. If the flanges of the brasses do not quite fit the

length of the journal, as is very commonly the case, it is customary to

tighten the key until the rod end can just be moved by hand so as to

force the brass flanges against first one and then the other end of the

journal. This is an approximate adjustment; and if the journal heats at

all, the key is slacked back a trifle; whereas if it pounds, the key is

set up a little. As a matter of fact, then, nothing is actually known of

the precise fit of the brass to the journal; and while looseness may be

detected by the pounding, the brass may be tight enough to cause undue

wear without very sensibly heating the journal, especially if the latter

is freely lubricated. If, however, the brasses fit the length of the

journal, and do not butt, it is usual to drive the key in till the

brasses bind the journal, and to then slack the key back to the

necessary amount. What that amount should be cannot be stated, because

it varies with the taper of the key and the force with which it is

driven home. As a result, then, the operation is left to the judgment,

or, in other words, to guess-work, of men, many of whom are not well

experienced in the operation; while under any circumstances the actual

fit is not positively known. A plan not infrequently adopted is to

insert a piece of lead wire of small diameter between the brasses, the

key is first driven tightly home, and then slacked back until the lead

wire is just freed. It is estimated that the adjustment will then be

correct; there is no actual certainty of the fit, however, even in this

case.

Another objection is that the oil is apt to flow out of the opening, and

the brass having communication with the oil cup is better lubricated

than the other brass.

In cases where the brasses are difficult to get out of the strap,

because of the location or of the size and weight of the parts, a piece

of sheet brass is sometimes placed between the joint faces, and this

piece is filed thinner to let the brasses together, the necessary

thickness for the piece being ascertained by the lead wire process

described. If the strap is held to the rod end by a gib and key only,

and the joint faces are left open, there is nothing to lock the strap to

the rod end save the jaws of the gib, whereas when the brasses butt, the

key binds the brasses to the end face of the rod and the strap to the

brasses, which if there is any wear sideways (as in locomotives),

prevents the keys from wearing the sides of the key ways and the brass

flanges from wearing the straps.

A method of overcoming this defect is shown in Fig. 2379, where the

joint faces are left open, and four set-screws S, S, two on each side of

the rod, pass through the flange of one brass and abut against the face

of the other, serving to adjust the fit of the brasses to the journal,

and lock them in their adjusted position, locking at the same time the

brasses to the strap and the strap to the rod end.

When the rods are finished so far as the fitting of its various parts

are concerned, the brasses should be marked so that the bore, when bored

out, will leave an equal thickness of metal between the brass and the

strap on each side of the bore, while the rod will be of proper length.

To accomplish this, mark on the outside face of the top brass two lines

level with the faces which fit against the inside jaws of the strap, as

shown in Fig. 2380, A, B being the lines referred to. We then key up the

brasses in their places in the rod and fasten a centre piece in the

brasses at each end of the rod. Upon these centre pieces we first mark a

line parallel with and central between the lines A, B, and then a line

across the joint of the brasses if the joint faces meet, and in the

centre of the space between them if they do not meet.

[Illustration: Fig. 2379.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2380.]

Before applying the trammels to test the rod length, the latter should

be stood or placed in the position in which it works when on the engine;

for all rods deflect by their weight, the amount of such deflection

depending upon the position in which the rod is suspended. The trammels

also deflect, it is true, but their deflection is allowed for in setting

them, whereas the deflection of the rod will not be accounted for unless

it is trammelled when standing or lying in the position in which it

works.

FITTING UP SOLID-ENDED CONNECTING RODS.--In fitting up solid-ended rods

the side faces require to be filed up first and the jaws to receive the

brasses next, taking care to file them out either square with the faces,

or if slightly taper, as they should be, then each inside face should be

an equal degree of taper to the side faces. This is necessary so that if

the brasses are bored true to their own faces, the bore of the brasses

at one end of the rod shall stand parallel to the bore of those at the

other end.

The fitting of the keys and brasses is performed as described for

strap-ended rods.

The reason that the jaws or box that receives the brasses is but a

trifle taper is that in that case they are easier made a good fit, as

they can be tried in their places while being fitted and before being

reduced to the finished size, and furthermore because they can be put in

and taken out easier.

FITTING UP A FORK-END CONNECTING ROD.--A fork-end connecting rod affords

as good an example of vice work as can be found, because any faulty

workmanship, either in the individual truth of the parts, or their

relative truth one part to another, will make itself very plainly

apparent.

[Illustration: Fig. 2381.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2382.]

Fig. 2381 represents a side and plan view of an ordinary form of

fork-end rod, and the requirements are that the centre line A of the

brass bores at the fork end shall be parallel with the centre line B of

the bore at the butt end; that the side faces of all the brasses shall

be parallel one to the other; that the side faces at the fork end shall

be equidistant, or at the required distance, from the side faces at the

butt end as denoted by C, D; that the bores of the brasses shall be at

the proper distance apart to make the length of the rod come right; that

the brasses at the fork end shall be the right distance apart, and that

they shall stand parallel to each other, as well as to the bore at the

butt end, as denoted by the line E in Fig. 2382.

If the rod were of a size that it could be conveniently handled and

planed, if forged solid, the fitting up would be much simplified,

because the setting of the rod for the machine operation would, to a

great extent, insure truth in the relative alignment of the parts. Thus

all the side faces of the rod ends could be planed at one chucking, in

which case they would necessarily be parallel, and their proper relative

distances apart, if the rod was properly marked out by lines and planed

to the lines. The jaws or ways to receive the brasses would be slotted

out together, and necessarily true, if the rod was chucked true on the

machine table. But even in this case the rod has to be marked out by

lines denoting where the metal is to be cut off to, and the principles

involved in the lining are just the same as those involved in the

fitting up.

[Illustration: Fig. 2383.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2384.]

If the rod be large, the ends may be, and usually are, forged and fitted

up separately, and subsequently welded to the body of the rod, which has

been forged separately. In this case, the alignment of the parts is a

part of the process in welding the rod, and setting it after welding.

All the principles involved in making the rod ends separate, and

afterwards welding them, or in marking out a small and complete forged

rod, are, however, involved in the process of refitting an old rod in

the jaws, and putting in new brasses; hence a description of that

process will cover the whole ground. The first thing to do is to file up

the side faces, as F, G, Fig. 2381, and, in doing this, all that is

necessary is to file F up true, when tested by a straight-edge applied

as in Fig. 2383, in which R is the fork and S a straight-edge, whose

edge should measure the same distance at H as it does at I from the side

face F, while the face C measures the same distance from face A of the

other fork end, or from the imaginary centre line X, Fig. 2381. Then

turning the rod on its side, a straight-edge should be placed across the

face F, and one across the face G, as in Fig. 2384, at S and S´; and the

edges of the two straight-edges should stand parallel, when sighted in

such a position that the edges are very nearly in line with the eye, as

shown in the figure.

The inside faces of the fork jaws may be filed to measurement from the

outside ones.

[Illustration: Fig. 2385.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2386.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2387.]

The ways for the brasses should be filed square with the outside faces,

as shown in Fig. 2385, in which S is a [T]-square; but if one jaw is

wider than the other, as sometimes occurs, it will not matter, providing

that, with the square applied, resting against the side and the face of

the ways on the narrow jaw, the ways of the other jaw are equidistant

from the square blade, as would be the case; for example, if the width

of the ways of the jaw J extended to the dotted lines at K, L, because

the line P would still form the centre line of both jaws, standing at a

right angle to the side faces of the fork end, and parallel to the bore

of the brasses at the butt end. Before filing up the side faces at the

butt end, the strap should be fitted on and keyed up, so that its side

faces may be filed up with those on the rod. To test the truth of the

side faces at the butt end, a straight-edge should be applied, as at S

and S´´, Fig. 2386, being pressed firmly to the side faces at the butt

B, the fork faces being measured from the edge of the straight-edge at

that end, and also with straight-edges, as in Fig. 2384. The brasses,

after being fitted into the ways of the jaws, should have their joint

faces squared, as in Fig. 2387, the top of each jaw being shown broken

away, so as to fully expose the brasses. S is a square held firmly

against the side face of a jaw, the brasses having their joint faces

true with the square blade, and true also when tested with a square,

applied as in Fig. 2388, in which B is the brass and S the square. The

brasses at the other end should be filed true to the side faces of the

strap in a similar manner, and, the fitting being completed, it simply

remains to mark off the brasses for boring. The joint faces of the

brasses should form the centre of their respective bores; hence, all

that is necessary, is to insure that the brasses be of equal thickness,

top and bottom, and this may be accomplished as follows: Mark across

each face a line even with the ways of the brass, as shown in Fig. 2389,

at A, C, and carry these lines around the side face, as shown in the

figure at B, D. Place the brasses in the strap, put in a piece of wood

whereon the compasses may be rested, as shown in Fig. 2390, which

represents one jaw, and mark on this piece of wood a line even with the

joint faces of the brasses, and on this line a centre-punch dot

equidistant between the lines B, D. From this dot, as a centre, strike

the circle shown, and define it by centre-punch dots, and if the

lathe-hand chucks the brasses true to the ways that fit the rod jaws,

and to the dotted circle, the bores will stand true in every respect.

[Illustration: Fig. 2388.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2389.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2390.]

REPAIRING CONNECTING RODS.--In repairing connecting rods the following

is the work usually required to be done, and in the order named:

Refitting straps, refitting gibs, and perhaps new gibs and keys, filing

up the side faces of rod ends and straps, lining up brasses to make them

fit the strap, lining up the rod to length and fitting the brasses

together so as to fit their journals.

[Illustration: Fig. 2391.]

If the strap is taper and can be closed by pening, the outside of the

back should be pened; but if the strap requires closing in the

blacksmith's shop, then it should be tested by winding strips as shown

in Fig. 2391, to insure that the faces are true, and thus save filing at

the key ways and on the side faces to make them come fair with the rod

ends. The rod ends should then be filed up and the straps fitted on.

[Illustration: Fig. 2392.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2393.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2394.]

Next comes putting in the new key and gib, or refitting the old gib. If

the jaw of the gib has cut into the strap, as it will do in some cases

(especially in marine and locomotive rods), this may be repaired as

follows: Cut out the recess shown in Fig. 2392 at A, making it

dovetail-shaped as shown, and with a set chisel set up its sides as

shown in Fig. 2393, which is a sectional side elevation through the line

of B. Cut out a piece of wrought iron and bevel its edges as shown in

Fig. 2394, filing it to fit into the recess cut at A, Fig. 2392, and

letting the bevelled edge be uppermost. Then take a set chisel and close

down again upon the bevelled edge of the piece the metal that was set

up, as shown in Fig. 2393, and the piece will be riveted, and it and the

gib jaw may be refitted to touch the piece thus let in.

[Illustration: Fig. 2395.]

The jaws of the gib are sometimes made slightly taper at A, Fig. 2395.

To refit the brasses to the jaws of the strap, the flanges which do not

as a rule wear much are usually tinned with a soldering iron, and given

a lining of babbitt metal. This must be done all around the flanges (of

both pairs of brasses) that come on the same side of the rod, so as to

keep the faces of the brasses leading fair.

[Illustration: Fig. 2396.]

The fit between the jaws is restored by riveting pieces of sheet brass

to that side of the brasses that has worn the most (usually the top

which carries the weight of the rod). Fig. 2396 shows this operation

carried out, A being the pieces of sheet brass which are sometimes

soldered as well as held by rivets. These rivets are screwed into the

brass, being composed of softened brass wire riveted after being screwed

in.

If these pieces, which are called liners, are placed on the top of the

brasses at one end, they should also be placed at the top of the brasses

at the other end of the rod. They should not be less than about the 1/24

inch thick, the body of the brass being cut off to admit them if

necessary.

In filing the joint faces of the brasses to let them together so as to

take up the lost motion due to the wear of the brass bore and of the

crank pin, the following considerations are met.

[Illustration: Fig. 2397.]

If the brass faces are to come "brass and brass," that is, butt

together, when their bore is of the diameter of the journal, file those

faces away until the bore appears just perceptibly too large for the

journal, when measured with calipers, as in Fig. 2397, the bore

measuring parallel all the way through. But, in doing this, it is

necessary to be careful to file each brass so that it shall embrace

one-half the journal diameter, which will be the case when the two

brasses measure correctly as above, and alike, when tested, as in Fig.

2398, in which P is a planed surface, C a pair of inside calipers, and B

a brass resting on P. When filing the joint faces, test them with a

square as in Fig. 2399, in which _s_ is a square and B a brass, and also

in Fig. 2400, in which _s_ is a square and B the brass shown in section,

thus making the faces quite square.

[Illustration: Fig. 2398.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2399.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2400.]

The necessity of having their faces quite square when the brasses come

brass and brass may be shown as follows:--

[Illustration: Fig. 2401.]

Suppose the joint to be at an angle as at A, A, Fig. 2401, instead of

square across, as denoted by the dotted lines B, B, then the respective

brasses will be forced by the key-pressure in the direction of the

respective arrows, and there will be a tendency to twist the brasses in

the strap. Or suppose the joint faces to be out of square as at C, C,

instead of square as at D, then there will be a tendency to twist the

respective brasses in the direction of E, F, and therefore to cause

these to move in the direction of G, H, and as a result the brasses will

spring the strap away from the rod, as shown at I, J.

[Illustration: Fig. 2402.]

To line up the brasses for length we proceed as follows: One of the

liners adjusts the length of the rod and the other simply serves to set

the key back to its proper height, so that it shall not pass too far

through the keyway, as the wear of the brasses lets it down. Which of

the liners will be the one by which to alter or adjust the length of the

rod depends upon the design of the rod itself; but, in the case of all

solid-ended rods, or those in which the position of the strap is fixed

by means of bolts, it is the liner behind the end brass, as D, in Fig.

2402, as stated in the opening of this discussion, and it is the first

one, therefore, to be fitted. The space at E is where the second liner

requires to be placed, its thickness being that necessary to lift up the

key from its bottom or lowest position, as shown in the cut, to the

highest position.

[Illustration: Fig. 2403.]

In strap-ended rods in which the strap is not bolted to the rod, but

moves farther upon the rod as the key passes farther through the keyway,

it is the brass next to the rod end, as B, in Fig. 2403, by which to

adjust the length of the rod, and its liner L is, therefore, the one to

be fitted first; the space E is, in this case, the one to be fitted with

a liner of sufficient thickness to lift the key up. It will now be noted

that the thickness of L in both figures requires to be exact, so that

the rod may be of correct length, which is necessary, so that there may

be the same amount of clearance or space between the piston head and the

cylinder cover when the piston is at the respective ends of the stroke.

But the liners to fill the respective spaces E need not necessarily be

of the exact thickness (although it is better that they should be),

because if too thin the only effect will be that the key will pass

farther through the keyway than otherwise. In considering in any form of

rod which is the liner to be put in first to bring the rod to length, we

have the general rule that the brass that moves in the strap or rod end

when the key is moved farther through the keyway is the one to be lined

last. The method of obtaining the proper thickness of the liners L,

Figs. 2402 and 2403, are as follows: If the rods have been correctly

made at first, the centre of the brass bores will be midway in the

spaces for the brasses (denoted by F in the two figures). If the

oil-holes in the strap or rod end (as the case may be) have been drilled

in the centre of this space F as they should be, then the line _g_ will

represent the centre of F and the centre of the oil-holes, and all that

will be necessary will be to place behind D and B respectively a liner

of sufficient thickness to bring the joint face of these brasses (D and

B) even with the line _g_. To ascertain the thickness of liner necessary

for this purpose, suppose the case of a rod end of the design shown in

Fig. 2402, then, with the strap off the rod, drive the brass D down

until its crown face beds fairly against the strap C, and with a scriber

mark on the inside face of the jaw of the strap a line coincident with

the joint face of the brass, then set the brass up the strap until its

joint face comes fair with the centre of the oil-hole or the central

line _g_, and then mark a second line so that on taking the brass out of

the strap there will appear two lines, and the distance between these

two lines is the necessary thickness of liner. In the case of the form

of rod end shown in Fig. 2403, the process would be as follows: Let the

strap have placed in it the brass B only, place it upon the rod, and set

it so that it binds the gib and key, when the key is lifted up to its

required position, then, with the brass B bedding fairly against the rod

end, mark on the strap a line coincident with the joint face of the

brass as before. Then move the brass in the strap until its face comes

fair with the centre of the oil-hole or line _g_, and mark another line,

and the thickness between these lines is the thickness of liner required

at L.

[Illustration: Fig. 2404.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2405.]

[Illustration: Fig. 2406.]

Modern Machine-Shop Practice, Volumes I and II · 第 34 / 49 章