IV. TO MARCUS VARRO

(_Fam._, XXIV, 6)

Thy rare integrity, thine activity, and the great splendor of thy

name urge me to love and in fact revere thee. There are some,

indeed, whom we love even after their death, owing to the good and

righteous deeds that live after them; men who mold our character

by their teaching and comfort us by their example when the rest of

mankind offends both our eyes and our nostrils; men who, though they

have gone hence to the common abode of all (as Plautus says in the

Casina[50]), nevertheless continue to be of service to the living.

Thou, however, art of no profit to us, or, at best, of only small

profit. But the fault is not thine--it is due to Time, which destroys

all things. All thy works are lost to us of today. And why not? ’Tis

only of gold that the present age is desirous; and when, pray, is

anyone a careful guardian of things despised?

Thou didst dedicate thyself to the pursuit of knowledge with

incredible zeal and incomparable industry, and yet thou didst not

for that reason abandon a life of action. Thou didst distinguish

thyself in both directions, and deservedly didst become dear to

those supremely eminent men, Pompey the Great and Julius Caesar.

Thou didst serve as a soldier under the one; to the other thou didst

address works worthy of admiration and full of the most varied

learning[51]--a most remarkable fact when we consider that they were

composed ’mid the widely conflicting duties of war and of peace.

Thou art deserving of great praise not only for thy genius and for

thy resolve to keep both mind and body in unremitting activity,

but also for having had the power and the wish to be of service

both to thy age and to all succeeding ages. But alas, thy works,

conceived and elaborated with such great care, have not been deemed

worthy of passing down to posterity through our hands. Our shameless

indifference has undone all thine ardor. Never has there been a

father ever so thrifty but that an extravagant son has been able to

squander within a short time the accumulated savings of years.

But why should I now enumerate thy lost works? Each title is a

stigma upon our name. It is better, therefore, to pass them over

in silence; for probing only opens the wound afresh, and a sorrow

once allayed is renewed by the memory of the loss incurred. But how

incredible is the power of fame! The name lives on, even though

the works be buried in oblivion. We have practically nothing of

Varro[52], yet scholars unanimously agree that Varro was most

learned.[53] Thy friend Marcus Cicero does not fear to make this

unqualified assertion in those very books in which he maintains that

nothing is to be asserted as positive. It is as if the splendor of

thy name had dazzled him; as if, in speaking of thee, he had lost

sight of the principles of his school.[54] Some there are who would

accept this testimony of Cicero only within the narrow bounds of

Latin literature, with whom therefore thou, O Varro, passest as the

most learned of the Romans.[55] But there are some who include Greek

literature as well, particularly Lactantius, a Roman most famous both

for his eloquence and his piety, who does not hesitate to declare

that no man has ever been more learned than Varro, not even among the

Greeks.[56]

Among thy countless admirers, however, two stand out pre-eminently:

one is he whom I have already mentioned, thy contemporary, thy

fellow-citizen, and thy fellow-disciple, Cicero, with whom thou didst

exchange numerous literary productions, thus devoting thy leisure

moments to a useful occupation, in obedience to the precepts of

Cato.[57] And if Cicero’s works were more long-lived than thine,

it must be accounted for by the charm of his style.[58] The second

of thy pre-eminent admirers is a most holy man, and one endowed

with a divine intellect, St. Augustine, African by birth, in speech

Roman. Would that thou hadst been able to consult him when writing

thy books on divine matters! Thou wouldst surely have become a

very great theologian, seeing that thou hadst so accurately and so

carefully laid down the principles of that theology with which thou

wert acquainted. It has been written of thee that thou wert such an

omnivorous reader as to cause wonder that thou couldst find any time

for writing, and that thou wert so prolific a writer as to make it

scarcely credible to us that anyone could even have read all that

thou didst write.[59] And yet, that I may withhold nothing concerning

the present condition of thy works, I shall say that there is not one

extant, or at best they are only in a very fragmentary state. But I

remember having seen some a long time ago,[60] and I am tortured by

the memory of a sweetness tasted only with the tip of the tongue, as

the saying goes. I am of the opinion that those very books on human

and divine matters, which greatly increased the reputation of thy

name, are still perchance in hiding somewhere, in search of which I

have worn myself out these many years. For there is nothing in life

more distressing and consuming than a constant and anxious hope ever

unfulfilled.

But enough of this. Be of good cheer. Treasure the moral comfort

deriving from thy uncommon labors, and grieve not that mortal things

have perished. Even while writing thou must have known that thy

work was destined to perish; for nothing immortal can be written

by mortal man. Forsooth, what matters it whether our work perish

immediately or after the lapse of a hundred thousand years, seeing

that at some time it must necessarily die? There is, O Varro, a long

line of illustrious men whose works were the result of an application

equal to thine own, and who have not been a whit more fortunate than

thou. And although not one of them was thy peer, yet thou shouldst

follow their example and bear thy lot with greater equanimity. Let

me enumerate some of this glorious company, for the mere utterance

of illustrious names gives me pleasure.[61] The following occur

to me: Marcus Cato the censor, Publius Nigidius, Antonius Gnipho,

Julius Hyginus, Ateius Capito, Gaius Bassus, Veratius Pontificalis,

Octavianus Herennius, Cornelius Balbus, Masurius Sabinus, Servius

Sulpitius, Cloacius Verus, Gaius Flaccus, Pompeius Festus, Cassius

Hemina, Fabius Pictor, Statius Tullianus, and many others whom it

would be tedious to enumerate, men once illustrious and now mere

ashes blown hither and thither by every gust of wind. With the

exception of the first two, their very names are scarcely known

today. Pray greet them in my name, but alas, with thy lips. I do

not send greetings to the Caesars Julius and Augustus and several

others of that rank, even though they were devoted to letters and

very learned, and though I know that thou wert very intimate with

some of them. It will be better, I am sure, to leave the sending of

such greetings to the emperors of our own age, provided they are not

ashamed of their predecessors, whose care and courage built up an

empire which they have overturned. Farewell forever, O illustrious

one.

_Written in the land of the living, in the capital of the

world, Rome, which was thy fatherland and became mine, on the

Kalends of November, in the year from the birth of Him whom I

would thou hadst known, the thirteen hundred and fiftieth._

Petrarch's Letters to Classical Authors · 第 14 / 30 题