OBSERVATIONS ON THE CITIES OF TEUCHIRA AND PTOLEMETA.
Actual Condition of the City of Teuchira — Perfect State and great
Strength of its Walls — Suggested Period of their Erection —
Mode in which they are constructed — Gates of the City — Narrow
Passage communicating with them — Probable Advance of the Sea
at Teuchira — Line described by the Walls — Estimated Circuit
of them according to Signor Della Cella — Greek Inscriptions
cut in various parts of them — Suggestions of Signor Della
Cella respecting them — Actual Nature of the Inscriptions —
Excavated Tombs in the Quarries of Teuchira — Egyptian Names of
Months generally adopted by the Inhabitants of the City — General
Nature of the Plans of the Tombs — Some of the Bodies appear
to have been burnt, and others to have been buried entire — No
Difference appears to have obtained at Teuchira between the Modes
of Burial adopted by its Greek and Roman Inhabitants — Encumbered
State of what are probably the earliest Tombs — Solitary instance
of a Painted Tomb at Teuchira — Remains of Christian Churches,
and other Buildings within the Walls — Disposition of the Streets
— Remains without the Walls — No Statues, or Remains of them,
discovered by our Party at Teuchira — Remarks on the Wall of
Ptolemeta — Remains of a Naustothmos, or Naval Station, observed
there — Other Remains of Building on the Beach near the Station
— Further traces of the City-Wall — Dimensions of Ptolemeta —
Remains of Theatres found there — Description of the larger one
— Ruins described by Bruce as part of an Ionic Temple — Other
Remains in the Neighbourhood of these — Remarks on the Style of
some of the Buildings of Ptolemeta, as contrasted with those of
Egypt and Nubia — Probable Date of its existing Remains.
It will be seen, by a reference to the plan of the city of Teuchira,
that there is little now remaining within the limits of its walls to
call for any particular details. The destruction of the town has,
in fact, been so complete, that it is scarcely more than a heap
of confused ruins; and the various fragments of building which are
scattered over its surface encumber the ground-plans so effectually,
that more labour and time would be necessary for their removal than
the buildings would probably merit. It is evident that Teuchira has
been intentionally destroyed; and that the solidity of its walls has
alone prevented them from being confounded in the general wreck. The
perfect state in which these still continue to remain will, however,
compensate for the losses we have sustained within their limits; and
we may consider them as affording one of the best examples extant
of the military walls of the ancients. Procopius has informed us
that the city of Teuchira was very strongly fortified by the Emperor
Justinian; and the restoration of the original wall which inclosed it
(which we may suppose to have been laid in ruins by the Vandals) was
probably the chief point to which the historian alluded. We are not
aware of any data by which the precise period of the first erection
of these walls may be ascertained; but their solidity would induce
us to refer them to an epoch anterior to the time of the Ptolemies;
while the regularity with which they have, at the same time, been
constructed would prevent us from assigning to them a very early
date[1]. It is well known that the most ancient walls which remain
to us are as remarkable for the irregularity as they are for the
solidity of their structure; and the term _Cyclopean_, which has
been generally applied to them, has almost become synonymous with
_irregular_.
The existing walls of Teuchira have undoubtedly been constructed at
a period when architecture had attained great perfection; the mode
of building adopted in them is uniform and regular, well calculated
from its nature to save labour and expense, and is such as could
only have been successfully employed where the blocks of stone used
were large and heavy. Two ranges of stone, longitudinally placed,
form the outer and inner surface of the structure; and these are
crossed by a single block at regular intervals the length of which is
the thickness of the wall: a space is left between the longitudinal
ranges, about equivalent to the breadth of the stones which compose
them; and this is filled up with what is usually termed rubble,
(which here appears to be the refuse of the material employed,)
and occasionally with a single stone. Little or no cement has been
used in the building (so far at least as we were able to discover);
and, indeed, the weight of the several blocks, with the pressure
upon them, would seem to render it wholly unnecessary.
Six and twenty quadrangular turrets contribute at the same time to
the strength and the defence of the wall; and two gates flanked with
buttresses, projecting inwards, by which the entrance is defended,
and placed opposite to each other on the east and western walls,
are the only approaches to the town[2]. The entrance through these
(as is usual in ancient towns) is by means of a narrow passage
formed by the buttresses mentioned above; but the gate itself is
not placed within the line of the walls, as we find to have been
the case with that of Mycenæ, but ranges with them. Nearly in the
centre of the southern wall there are two turrets of considerably
larger dimensions than the rest, which are at the same time of
a more recent construction, and immediately opposite to them is
an outer wall of a semicircular form. We naturally searched here
for another entrance to the town, but could find no appearance of
there ever having been one: yet, except it were for the defence of
a gateway, there does not seem to be any sufficient reason why these
turrets should be larger than the rest; and if there were no entrance
through them to the town there has been none on the south side at
all[3]. On the north side of Teuchira (it will appear in the plan)
no part of the city wall is remaining, and it is probable that it
has been undermined by the sea which appears to have here advanced
(as it has on other parts of the coast) beyond its original bounds.
The line described by the walls, although somewhat quadrangular, is
by no means a regular figure—a diagonal drawn from the opposite
corners, at the north-east and south-western angles, would be a
line of about three thousand two hundred English feet; while that
which would pass through the north-west and south-eastern angles
would be about nine hundred feet shorter. The circuit of the walls
has been estimated by Signor Della Cella at about two miles; but
we found it, by measurement, to be less than a mile and a half;
being comprised in a line of eight thousand six hundred English
feet[4]. On the interior of the wall, as we have already stated,
there are a good many Greek inscriptions; but we were not fortunate
enough to find their contents quite so interesting as Dr. Della
Cella has supposed they might have been, when he tells us, that
“all the annals of the city might perhaps be found registered
on its walls[5].” We examined the whole space, however, very
attentively and found only a collection of names, which we should
scarcely have thought it worth while to copy had not the Doctor’s
assertion made it necessary to shew what portion of information
the inscriptions actually contained. They will be found, with other
inscriptions from the excavated tombs of Teuchira, in page 386; and
it will be seen that the names are chiefly Greek, and the character,
for the most part, Ptolemaic; but no other dates could be found,
on any part of the surface mentioned excepting the few which appear
in the plate. The inscriptions alluded to by Signor Della Cella,
on a quadrangular building towards the centre of the city, consist
also wholly of names and dates; they are encircled by a wreath, and
it will be seen by the plate that these names are for the most part
Roman. A few names, within a similar enclosure, were also visible on
the wall of a turret, one of which (the most legible) we have copied.
The excavated tombs in the neighbourhood of Teuchira contain a vast
number of Greek inscriptions; but these also afford only names and
dates, of different countries and periods; and the most interesting
piece of information that we were enabled to derive from them,
was the proof which they afford of the Egyptian names of months
having been in general use in this part of the Cyrenaica.
Many of the tombs, and it is probable also most of the earliest,
are now buried under a mass of drifted sand; and among these it
is not unlikely that dates might be found of very considerable
antiquity. From the wreck of materials, also, which encumber the
city, some valuable inscriptions might possibly be obtained, but
the labour of clearing the ground to search for them would perhaps
be too great to be undertaken with propriety, on the mere chance
of such discoveries.
Of the tombs at Teuchira into which we were able to penetrate,
(we mean such as are not buried in sand,) there are none, that we
could find, of any particular interest. They appear to have been
at all times very rude, compared with those of Egypt and Cyrene,
and the inscriptions upon them are in many instances very rudely
cut. Most of them have only one chamber, three sides of which are
sometimes occupied by places cut into the wall for the reception
of bodies. Some have only two, and others again only one of these
places, in which case (we mean the latter) it is usually found
opposite to the door. In several of the tombs there are no places
discernible for bodies, and rudely-cut columbaria are all that
can be perceived in them; in others again we find both, but seldom
placed in the same position with regard to each other.
We may infer from these circumstances, that some of the bodies
were burnt, the ashes only being deposited in the tomb, and that
others were buried entire after being, most probably, embalmed: and
here we have a mixture of the Greek and Egyptian modes of burial,
as might naturally, indeed, be expected[6].
Not a trace of the mode in which the bodies had been embalmed, nor
indeed of any bodies at all, could we perceive either at Teuchira
or Ptolemeta. Not a single fragment, either of any cinerary urn
or of vases of any description. The dampness of the climate, in
the winter season, would no doubt contribute very materially to
the destruction of the bodies when the covers were once removed
from the excavated places which contained them; but it is at the
same time somewhat remarkable that not a single fragment of linen
or bone could be met with (though we searched for them with great
attention) by which the mode of burial could be ascertained. The
cause of this is most probably the occupation of the tombs by the
Arabs who, as we have stated above, make use of them occasionally
as places of residence for themselves and their cattle; and would
naturally throw out any similar remains when they chanced to be
seized with a fit of cleanliness or industry.
The pottery would also very speedily disappear before the repeated
attacks of the children; and such urns or vases as were found at
all perfect would be employed by the women for culinary purposes,
and depôts of various kinds, and would naturally be broken in the
course of time however carefully they may have been preserved. The
fragments thrown out would soon be buried in sand blown up into the
quarries, in heaps, from the sea; and thus all traces might easily
be lost as well of the bodies themselves, as of the vases and urns
which contained the ashes. There appears to have been no difference
whatever in the mode of burial practised by the Greeks and Romans
of Teuchira, since many of the tombs, which are similar within,
have on them the names of one and the other nation indiscriminately,
and they are often seen mingled together on the same.
It is probable that the early tombs would be interesting, and that
they would be found at the same time more perfect than the rest;
for the sand has accumulated about them in such heaps as to have
blocked up all access to them for ages. Those most buried are the
tombs which are nearest the town, and they are also, we should
imagine, the oldest; but we had no time to employ in excavating
any of them, although we very much wished to do so.
There is one example of a painted tomb at Teuchira, in very bad
taste, and this was the only one we could perceive that was so;
it is probable, however, that most of them have been originally
painted, and that what we see at present are the mere skeletons of
the originals[7].
Of the buildings contained within the walls of the city, the most
interesting of those whose plans were distinguishable, appeared to
us to be the two Christian churches which will be found, with all
the details we could procure of them, in the plate, page 367. In
both these it will be seen, that the part devoted to the altar was
on the eastern side of the building; but the extreme length of one
of them is much greater than usual, and it is not unlikely that
the portion at its western extremity, although comprised in the
same line of wall, was part of another building.
Near one of these (that to the eastward of the town) we found
part of an entablature in the worst taste of the lower empire,
which we conjectured to be the remains alluded to by Signor Della
Cella, as probably having formed a part of the temple of Bacchus:
it is true that they are mentioned by the Doctor as capitals and
not as parts of the epistylia; but as the fragment is small, it is
possible that such a mistake may have been made; and if this be not
what is alluded to in the passage below, we confess that nothing
else could be found among the ruins which would at all correspond
with the description[8].
The streets of Teuchira appear to have been built in squares,
and to have crossed each other at right angles. One large street
seems to have passed completely across the town, from the eastern
to the western gateway; and towards the centre of this we found
some columns and the arch of a gateway which probably stood across
the street. In various parts of the city, to the north-east and
south-west of it in particular, there are imposing remains of
fallen columns and entablatures, which have no doubt belonged to
buildings of more than ordinary importance; but without excavation
it would not be possible to give any satisfactory account of them,
and we have not ventured, in our plan of the town, to hazard any
attempt at restoring them. There are also some interesting remains
of buildings at the north-eastern angle of the city, where part of
a quarry has been enclosed within the walls for the better defence
of the place, to which indeed it effectually contributes; a strong
fort has been built at this angle, in an elevated and commanding
position, which appears to have been the citadel, or _strong-hold_
of the town. Without the walls, to the westward of the town, there
are also some interesting remains, the plans of which we attempted
to complete without success: we found there a group in alto-relief,
apparently of Roman workmanship, of which we have given an outline
at page 367. There were probably, in earlier times, many statues
in the city of Teuchira; but none of them at present remain,
not, at least, that we could discover; and they have, perhaps,
not survived the barbarism of the Vandals, or the fanaticism and
ignorance of those who have succeeded them.
We now pass to the remains of Ptolemeta; and shall begin by
observing, that no traces of the wall, which originally enclosed
it would present themselves to the notice of a casual observer in
taking a general view of the town. On examination, however, in the
neighbourhood of the gateway, with which it seems probable that
walls have been connected, we discovered traces of them running
straight down to the quarry, in which we have already mentioned
the amphitheatre was built and excavated. Here we found that the
wall had passed through the quarry; and that a portion of the rock
had been left on each side of it, in the line of the wall’s
direction, connecting the part which ran down from the gateway
with that which we discovered on the opposite side of the quarry,
extending itself from thence to the sea. The remains of the wall
between the quarry and the sea are very conspicuous and decided;
they run down quite to the water’s edge, and are here about
eight feet in thickness, and, in some parts, as much as twelve
and thirteen feet in height[9]. Without these (to the westward),
almost buried in sand, are the remains of the Naustathmos (or
naval station), built for the protection of vessels: they begin
from the wall, following the line of the beach towards the mouth
of the western ravine, and were themselves protected from the sea
by a breakwater of about fourteen feet in thickness. The walls of
the υφορμοι (uphormoi)[10] are seven feet in thickness, and
the spaces which they inclose, where the vessels were stationed,
as much as thirty and forty feet across, in those parts which the
sand had not altogether covered. To the westward of the ravine,
other traces of wall are visible, extending themselves from that (in
a line with the beach) along a road which leads towards the quarries,
in which are the insulated tombs already alluded to, represented
in plate (p. 355). Further traces of walls are observable running
round this harbour towards the point marked A in the plan; and it
seems to have been altogether divided from the inland country, as
we find to have been usual with the ancients, more particularly in
time of war[11]. We had no opportunities of ascertaining whether any
other remains of a cothon are to be seen between the points A and B,
where the χηλαι (keelai, or cornua), the claws, or horns (as
they were called) of the harbour, would be looked for if any such
had formerly existed. Remains of a wall running round the small
port within the town (on the eastern side of point B), and which
we may call the eastern harbour, are still visible; and a strong
fort yet remains on either side of it, at the eastern and western
extremity of the wall, which appears to have been often the case[12].
The Pharos, or light-house, if any such existed, was probably erected
on the high ground on point B, in the neighbourhood of the fort at
its eastern extremity, and columns and other fragments of building,
at the back of the western port, point out the places of those
structures usually erected by the ancients near their harbours,
for the accommodation of the merchants and sailors: here also are
the remains of a bridge which was formerly thrown across the ravine,
running down to the wall of this port.
We have already said that traces of the city-wall are observable
between the quarry which contains the amphitheatre and the gateway;
and a portion of it may also be remarked extending from the latter
to the mountains at the back of the town; where they are connected
with other parts of it running along the foot of the range to
the inner bank of the eastern ravine. There again decided remains
of the wall may be traced running parallel with the same ravine;
and which, passing near the bridge represented in plate (p. 362,)
continue towards the sea as far as the remains of the second bridge
which we have already mentioned. Beyond this we could perceive no
more traces of the wall; although it seems more than probable that
it extended on this side to the beach, (as we find it to have done
on the opposite side to the westward,) and that it passed along
parallel with the sea, till it joined the portions connecting the
two forts of the eastern harbour, which we have already observed
to be remaining. We could not discover any traces of a gateway in
the eastern wall of the city; but it is probable that there was
formerly one on this side also, leading to the upper bridge, where
some very strong works are still extant, in the form of a curve,
as will appear by a reference to the plan.
It is difficult to say how these works were connected with the
remains of the wall between them and the mountains; and had our time
allowed it, we should have excavated about them for the purpose of
discovering the connection.
We may reckon that the walls of Ptolemeta, when entire, inclosed a
quadrangle of eighteen thousand English feet in circuit; and the line
of wall which may be traced from the existing remains covers a space
of at least thirteen thousand. A line drawn through the centre of the
city, from north to south, would be about four thousand eight hundred
feet in length; and that which should be drawn across it from east to
west, about four thousand four hundred. The whole circuit of the city
would thus be somewhat less than three English miles and a half[13];
its length, from north to south, something less than a mile[14], and
its breadth from east to west something more than three-quarters[15].
Such of the plans of the buildings at Ptolemeta as could in their
present state be satisfactorily made out, will be found in plate
(page 385;) but although the forms of the theatres and amphitheatre
prevent their being mistaken for other buildings, it would not
be possible without excavation to make out their details with any
accuracy. We have given our idea of the larger of the two theatres,
from the appearance and the measurements of the existing remains
of it[16], but the smaller one was too much ruined, and too much
encumbered, to allow of our hazarding a similar attempt, and we
have confined ourselves to its general dimensions, as given in the
plan of the town. We may reckon the diameter of the orchestra of
the larger theatre at about one hundred and forty-five English feet,
and that of the part appropriated to the cunei, at about fifty of the
same. The whole diameter of the theatre would thus be two hundred and
forty-five feet. It will be observed that the area of the orchestra
is very considerably larger than that occupied by the same part of
the building in Greek and Roman theatres in general, and that the
passages leading into it are wider in proportion to the cunei than
usual. It will also be seen, from the absence of any prœcinctions,
that there were no interior communications in this theatre, by which
the spectators dispersed themselves over the body of the house:
the only approach to the seats having been by means of passages
communicating directly with the orchestra from without, which
appear to have been nearly on a level with the orchestra itself;
the roofs of them, only, sloping somewhat in the direction of the
seats themselves. As these (the seats) were comparatively few,
and the spaces between the passages inconsiderable, there was no
necessity for staircases, and we accordingly find no appearance of
any communications of this nature. As it seems, however, that the
lowest range of seats was raised a few feet above the level of the
passage and of the orchestra, a short flight of steps would have
been necessary, to render the access to them easy; and we thought
we observed traces, in two or three of the divisions, of there
having been one originally in each. The arched roofs of all the
passages have fallen in, and every part of the theatre has suffered
materially from the effects of rainy winters, rather than of time.
The depth of the proscenium appears to have been, as we have given
it, about twenty-five feet, but we could recover no part of the stage
with any tolerable accuracy, so that we have omitted it altogether.
The amphitheatre has been chiefly excavated (as we have already
observed) in the quarry in which it stands, and a small portion
of it only has been built, where the rock could not be made to
serve. Here, as in the theatres, there appear to have been no
interior communications; and the approach to the seats was probably
from above, as well as from below, by means of the staircases between
the several cunei only, no passages being anywhere observable. The
whole of this is so ruined, that we shall give no further details
of it than we have offered to our readers, merely stating, that its
form appeared to have been round, in which particular it differs
from amphitheatres in general, which are usually of an oblong
figure. The diameter of the circle may be reckoned at about two
hundred and fifty English feet, including the cunei and arena.
The remains marked (_a_) are the same which Bruce describes as those
of an Ionic temple; there is nothing, however, (that we can perceive)
in the disposition of what still exists of their plan, to authorize
such a conclusion; and we have considered them as the remains of
a palace, or other residence of more than ordinary importance. The
three remaining columns appear to have formed part of a colonnade
extending itself round the court-yard, which has already been
described as situated above an extensive range of cisterns: remains
of tessellated pavement are still observable in the court-yard, and
the walls which inclose it are very decided; the columns have been
raised on a basement of several feet in height, as will be seen in
the vignette in which they are represented. Without these, to the
northward, are ranges of fallen columns of much larger dimensions
than those we have just mentioned; but they are so much encumbered,
that we have not ventured to lay them down in the plan: they are of
the Corinthian order, and the capitals are well executed. A little
beyond these, to the northward and north-eastward, are other remains
of columns, which once belonged to a building of some importance,
the plan of which cannot be given without excavation; and, indeed,
we may observe, with respect to the numerous masses of fallen
columns, and other parts of various buildings of more than ordinary
consequence at Ptolemeta, that very little satisfactory information
can be obtained of their plans, without a good deal of labour in
clearing them, from the accumulation of soil, and the fragments of
fallen building, with which they are encumbered. There is a structure
of very large dimensions at the north-eastern part of the town, the
outer walls of which are still standing to a considerable height; but
the plan of its interior is not sufficiently apparent to authorize
any restoration of it, and we will not even hazard a conjecture of
its nature. On its northern face are three large quadrangular tablets
of stone, built into the wall, each five feet in length by four in
height, on which are cut the Greek inscriptions (marked 1), given
in plate (page 385); and to the westward and south-westward of this
building are many interesting remains of private dwelling-houses,
palaces, baths, &c., which require a great deal of excavation. On
a pedestal in one of these, is the inscription (4) in plate (page
385); most of them appear to have been Roman, and the capitals and
bases of some of the columns belonging to them are very fanciful and
overcharged with ornament. Some of the shafts of small columns in
this mass of building are spiral, and formed of coloured marbles;
and may probably be attributed to the time of Justinian, when the
city revived under his politic munificence. If the taste displayed by
the Greeks and Romans of this period had been at all in proportion
to the expense which they lavished upon their public and private
edifices of almost every description, the result would have been
splendid in the extreme; but the costliness of material, and the
labour employed in ornament, will not compensate for the absence
of this true test of genuine excellence; and we cannot venture to
commend the strange mixture of received orders, and the wayward
fancy employed in the invention of new ones, which are conspicuous
in several parts of Ptolemeta.
It has been observed by Signor Della Cella, that the remains of this
city are purely Egyptian; but we must confess that we were unable
to discover the slightest resemblance of style in Ptolemeta to that
which characterizes the architecture of Egypt. There is nothing
at Ptolemeta (that we could perceive) which is not either Greek or
Roman; and the profusion of unnecessary ornament, which generally
distinguished the later productions of both these nations, is very
different from that which is observable in Egyptian remains. The
style of Egypt, though highly ornamental, is founded on established
principles; and there is nothing incongruous or unmeaning in the
most laboured decorations which are peculiar to it: proportion and
simplicity are very rarely violated in the buildings either of Egypt
or Nubia; and the great variety of ornament which appears in them
never disturbs the general effect, or detracts from the imposing
grandeur of the masses. Whenever the general form and larger parts of
a building are simple and well proportioned, a great deal of ornament
may be adopted in the detail, without injury to the effect of the
whole; and as this is particularly the case in Egyptian architecture,
the mind is strongly impressed with the pleasing character of the
general mass, before it has time to notice any other peculiarities.
The same may be observed with respect to Gothic architecture;
in which the almost infinite detail which it presents is not
found to diminish either the simplicity, the grandeur, or the
elegance of the whole. When the attention is turned from the
general mass to the subdivisions, every portion, however small,
is observed to have a meaning, in both styles of architecture here
alluded to; and there is seldom any part of the ornament, either
in Egyptian or in Gothic examples, which we wish to have removed
from its place. In the capitals and shafts of Egyptian columns,
(which are usually composed of different parts of the lotus, the
leaves, the stalks, the open flower, or the bud, so combined and
arranged as not to interfere with the simple and, generally, graceful
outline of the whole,) the detail gives a lightness to the general
mass which tends to improve its effect; and the simplicity of the
general form exhibits the decoration to advantage: but in the later
productions of Greece and Rome, a profusion of unmeaning ornament
is employed, which rather gives an air of heaviness to the detail,
than any appearance of lightness to the mass. The general forms
are not, in fact, sufficiently important of themselves to create
a favourable impression; and it will usually be found difficult,
if not impossible, to make amends for this fault by decoration. We
do not mean to assert that there are no examples of good taste at
Ptolemeta; but it appears to us that by far the greater part of the
buildings now remaining have been constructed since the place became
a Roman colony; and that there are none to which a higher antiquity
may be safely assigned (with the exception of some of the tombs)
than the period at which the country was occupied by the Ptolemies.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 1: Many of the stones employed in the restoration of the
walls have belonged to more ancient buildings, and parts of handsome
cornices, friezes, and capitals are often seen built in with the
original structure; among these may be noticed fragments of Ptolemaic
inscriptions, which are evidently not in their original places.]
[Footnote 2: We must except a low, narrow door, through one of
the turrets at the south-west angle, the mode of constructing
which will appear in page 367. It seems to have been intended as a
sally-port and one person only can pass through it at a time. From
the remains about this angle, there appears to have been an outer
wall of very inferior strength, but it seems to have made no part
of the original plan.]
[Footnote 3: Nearly opposite to these turrets, without the wall,
are the remains of a very strong fort; and this circumstance would
perhaps seem to favour the idea of there having been a gate in the
place here alluded to, the entrance to which would have been well
defended by the fort.]
[Footnote 4: The turrets attached to the walls are also described
by the same author as _round_; and it is difficult to imagine what
could have occasioned this mistake, since they are all of them
quadrangular, as will appear by the plan.]
[Footnote 5: Le mura della città sono talmenti tapezzate di Grechi
inscrizioni che forse trovansi qui registrati tutti gli annali di
questa città. (Viaggio da Tripoli, &c. p. 199.)]
[Footnote 6: The practice of burying the body entire was, however,
very frequently adopted by the Greeks in other places, as we shall
hereafter have occasion to mention.]
[Footnote 7: Plans and sections of some of the tombs will be found
in page 367, and we think the reader will not be able to trace so
much resemblance between the style of Teuchira and that of Cyrene
as Signor Della Cella has discovered, when he tells us that “Il
fabricato di Tochira, dello stessissimo stile di quello di Cirene,
la stessa copia, e struttura di tombi, conferma ciocchè di questa
città lasciò scritto Erodoto, _che usava le stesse leggi de’
Cirenei_.”—(Page 199.)]
[Footnote 8: Vi si scorgono pure gli avanzi di un tempio che io
credo essere stato dedicato a Bacco, a giudicarne da’ capitelli,
che giaciano affastellati fra le sue rovine, guarniti di foglie di
viti con grappoli pendenti.—(P. 199.)]
[Footnote 9: We mean, of course, in their present ruined state,
for the original height of the wall cannot now be ascertained.]
[Footnote 10: These divisions, composing the Naustathmos, were termed
ορμοι (ormoi), υφορμοι (uphormoi), or ναυλοκοι (naulokoi), as mentioned
in the account of the ports and harbours at the end of the Narrative.]
[Footnote 11: See account of ports and harbours, (p. 21).]
[Footnote 12: Ibid.]
[Footnote 13: 480 feet less.]
[Footnote 14: 480 less.]
[Footnote 15: 440 more.]
[Footnote 16: See plate.]