Non ego paucis offendar maculis,—

It is not pretended that this Journal has been faultless; there may be

communications in it which had been better omitted, and it is not

doubted that the power to command intellectual effort, by suitable

pecuniary reward, would add to its purity, as a record of science, and

to its richness, as a repository of discoveries in the arts.

But the editor, even now, offers payment, at the rate adopted by the

literary Journals, for able original communications, containing

especially important facts, investigations and discoveries in science,

and practical inventions in the useful and ornamental Arts.

As however his means are insufficient to pay for all the copy, it is

earnestly requested, that those gentlemen, who, from other motives,

are still willing to write for this Journal, should continue to favor

it with their communications. That the period when satisfactory

compensation can be made to all writers whose pieces are inserted, and

to whom payment will be acceptable, is not distant, may perhaps be

hoped, from the spontaneous expression of the following opinion, by

the distinguished editor of one of our principal literary journals,

whose letter is now before me. “The character of the American Journal

is strictly national, and it is the only vehicle of communication in

which an inquirer may be sure to find what is most interesting in the

wide range of topics, which its design embraces. It has become in

short, not more identified with the science than the literature of the

country.” It is believed that a strict examination of its contents

will prove that its character has been decidedly scientific; and the

opinion is often expressed to the editor, that in common with the

journals of our Academies, it is a work of reference, indispensable to

him who would examine the progress of American science during the

period which it covers. That it might not be too repulsive to the

general reader, some miscellaneous pieces have occasionally occupied

its pages; but in smaller proportion, than is common with several of

the most distinguished British Journals of Science.

Still, the editor has been frequently solicited, both in public and

private, to make it more miscellaneous, that it might be more

acceptable to the intelligent and well educated man, who does not

cultivate science; but he has never lost sight of his great object,

which was to produce and concentrate original American effort in

science, and thus he has foregone pecuniary returns, which by pursuing

the other course, might have been rendered important. Others would not

have him admit any thing that is not strictly and technically

scientific; and would make this journal for mere professors and

amateurs; especially in regard to those numerous details in natural

history, which although important to be registered, (and which, when

presented, have always been recorded in the American Journal,) can

never exclusively occupy the pages of any such work without repelling

the majority of readers.

If this is true even in Great Britain it is still more so in this

country; and our savants, unless they would be, not only the exclusive

admirers, but the sole purchasers of their own works, must permit a

little of the graceful drapery of general literature to flow around

the cold statues of science. The editor of this Journal, strongly

inclined, both from opinion and habit, to gratify the cultivators of

science, will still do everything in his power to promote its high

interests, and as he hopes in a better manner than heretofore; but

these respectable gentlemen will have the courtesy, to yield something

to the reading literary, as well as scientific public, and will not,

we trust, be disgusted, if now and then an _Oasis_ relieves the eye,

and a living stream refreshes the traveller. Not being inclined to

renew the abortive experiment, to please every body, which has been so

long renowned in fable; the editor will endeavor to pursue, the even

tenor of his way; altogther inclined to be courteous and useful to his

fellow travellers, and hoping for their kindness and services in

return.

_The Close of the First Series._

The “First Series,” as it was henceforth to be known, closed with the

fiftieth volume (1847, pp. xx + 347). This final volume is devoted to an

exhaustive index to the forty-nine volumes preceding. In the preface

(dated April 19, 1847) the elder Silliman, now the senior editor,

reviews the work that had been accomplished with a frank expression of

his feeling of satisfaction in the victory won against great obstacles;

with this every reader must sympathize. He quotes here at length (but in

slightly altered form) the matter from the first volume (1818), which

has been already reproduced almost entire, and then goes on as follows

(pp. xi _et seq._):

[Illustration: James D. Dana]

Such was the pledge which, on entering upon our editorial labors in

1818, we gave to the public, and such were the views which we then

entertained, regarding science and the arts as connected with the

interests and honor of our country and of mankind. In the retrospect,

we realize a sober but grateful feeling of satisfaction, in having, to

the extent of our power, discharged these self-imposed obligations;

this feeling is chastened also by a deep sense of gratitude, first to

God for life and power continued for so high a purpose; and next, to

our noble band of contributors, whose labors are recorded in half a

century of volumes, and in more than a quarter of a century of years.

We need not conceal our conviction, that the views expressed in these

“Introductory Remarks,” have been fully sustained by our fellow

laborers.

Should we appear to take higher ground than becomes us, we find our

vindication in the fact, that we have heralded chiefly the doings and

the fame of others. The work has indeed borne throughout “the impress”

of editorial unity of design, and much that has flowed from one pen,

and not a little from the pens of others, has been without a name. The

materials for the pile, have however been selected and brought in,

chiefly by other hands, and if the monument which has been reared

should prove to be “_aere perennius_,” the honor is not the sole

property of the architect; those who have quarried, hewn and polished

the granite and the marble, are fully entitled to the enduring record

of their names already deeply cut into the massy blocks, which

themselves have furnished.

If a retrospective survey of the labors of thirty years on this

occasion has rekindled a degree of enthusiasm, it is a natural result

of an examination of all our volumes from the contents of which we

have endeavored to make out a summary both of the laborers and their

works....

The series of volumes must ever form a work of permanent interest on

account of its exhibiting the progress of American science during the

long period which it covers. Comparing 1817 with 1847, we mark on this

subject a very gratifying change. The cultivators of science in the

United States were then few—now they are numerous. Societies and

associations of various names, for the cultivation of natural history,

have been instituted in very many of our cities and towns, and several

of them have been active and efficient in making original observations

and forming collections.

A summary follows presenting some facts as to the growth of scientific

societies and scientific collections in this country during the period

involved: Then the striking contrast between 1818 and 1847 in the matter

of organized effort toward scientific exploration is discussed, as

follows (pp. xvi _et seq._):

When we began our Journal, not one of the States had been surveyed in

relation to its geology and natural history; now those that have not

been explored are few in number. State collections and a United States

Museum hold forth many allurements to the young naturalist, as well as

to the archaeologist and the student of his own race. The late

Exploring Expedition [Wilkes] with the National Institute, has

enriched the capital with treasures rarely equalled in any country,

and the Smithsonian Institution recently organized at Washington, is

about to begin its labors for the increase and diffusion of knowledge

among men.

It must not be forgotten that the American Association of Geologists

and Naturalists—composed of individuals assembled from widely separate

portions of the Union—by the seven sessions which it has held, and by

its rich volume of reports, has produced a concentration and harmony

of effort which promise happy results, especially as, like the British

Association, it visits different towns and cities in its annual

progress.

Astronomy now lifts its exploring tubes from the observatories of many

of our institutions. Even the Ohio, which within the memory of the

oldest living men, rolled along its dark waters through interminable

forests, or received the stains of blood from deadly Indian warfare,

now beholds on one of its most beautiful hills, and near its splendid

city, a permanent observatory with a noble telescope sweeping the

heavens, by the hand of a zealous and gifted observer. At Washington

also, under the powerful patronage of the general government, an

excellent observatory has been established, and is furnished with

superior instruments, under the direction of a vigilant and well

instructed astronomer—seconded by able and zealous assistants.

Here also (in Yale College) successful observations have been made

with good instruments, although no permanent building has been erected

for an Observatory.

We only give single examples by way of illustration, for the history

of the progress of science in the United States, and of institutions

for its promotion, during the present generation, would demand a

volume. It is enough for our purpose that science is understood and

valued, and the right methods of prosecuting it are known, and the

time is at hand when its moral and intellectual use will be as obvious

as its physical applications. Nor is it to be forgotten that we have

awakened an European interest in our researches: general science has

been illustrated by treasures of facts drawn from this country, and

our discoveries are eagerly sought for and published abroad.

While with our co-workers in many parts of our broad land, we rejoice

in this auspicious change, we are far from arrogating it to ourselves.

Multiplied labors of many hands have produced the great results. In

the place which we have occupied, we have persevered despite of all

discouragements, and may, with our numerous coadjutors, claim some

share in the honors of the day. We do not say that our work might not

have been better done—but we may declare with truth that we have done

all in our power, and it is something to have excited many others to

effort and to have chronicled their deeds in our annals. Let those

that follow us labor with like zeal and perseverance, and the good

cause will continue to advance and prosper. It is the cause of

truth—science is only embodied and sympathized truth and in the

beautiful conception of our noble Agassiz—“it tells the thought of

God.”

The preface closes with some personal remarks:

In tracing back the associations of many gone-by years, a host of

thoughts rush in, and pensive remembrance of the dead who have labored

with us casts deep shadows into the vista through which we view the

past.

Anticipation of the hour of discharge, when our summons shall arrive,

gives sobriety to thought and checks the confidence which health and

continued power to act might naturally inspire, were we not reproved,

almost every day, by the death of some co-eval, co-worker, companion,

friend or patron. This very hour is saddened by such an event,—but we

will continue to labor on, and strive to be found at our post of duty,

until there is nothing more for us to do; trusting our hopes for a

future life in the hands of Him who placed us in the midst of the

splendid garniture of this lower world, and who has made not less

ample provision for another and a better.

_Editorial and financial._—The editorial labors on the Journal were

carried by the elder Silliman alone for twenty years from 1818 to 1838.

As has been clearly shown in his statements, already quoted, he was,

after the first beginning, personally responsible also for the financial

side of the enterprise. With volume =34= (1838) the name of Benjamin

Silliman, Jr., is added as co-editor on the title page. He was graduated

from Yale College the year preceding and at this date was only

twenty-one years old. His aid was unquestionably of much service from

the beginning and increased rapidly with years and experience. The elder

Silliman introduces him in the preface to vol. =34= (1838) and comes

back to the subject again in the preface to vol. =50= (1847). The whole

editorial situation is here presented as follows:

“During twenty years from the inception of this Journal, the editor

labored alone, although overtures for editorial cooperation had been

made to him by gentlemen commanding his confidence and esteem, and who

would personally have been very acceptable. It was, however, his

opinion that the unity of purpose and action so essential to the

success of such a work were best secured by individuality; but he made

every effort, and not without success, to conciliate the good will and

to secure the assistance of gentlemen eminent in particular

departments of knowledge. On the title page of No. 1, vol. =34=,

published in July, 1838, a new name is introduced: the individual to

whom it belongs having been for several years more or less concerned

in the management of the Journal, and from his education, position,

pursuits and taste, as well as from affinity, being almost identified

with the editor, he seemed to be quite a natural ally, and his

adoption into the editorship was scarcely a violation of individual

unity. His assistance has proved to be very important:—his near

relation to the senior editor prevents him from saying more, while

justice does not permit him to say less.”

As is distinctly intimated in the preceding paragraph the elder Silliman

was fortunate in obtaining the assistance in his editorial labors of

numerous gentlemen interested in the enterprise. Their cooperation

provided many of the scientific notices, book reviews and the like

contained in the Miscellany with which each number closed. It is

impossible, at this date, to render the credit due to Silliman’s helpers

or even to mention them by name. Very early Asa Gray was one of these as

occasional notes are signed by his initials. Dr. Levi Ives of New Haven

was another. Prof. J. Griscom of Paris also sent numerous contributions

even as early as 1825 (see =9=, 154, 1825; =22=, 192, 1832; =24=, 342,

1833, and others).

Some statements have already been quoted from the early volumes as to

the business part of Silliman’s enterprise. The subject is taken up more

fully in the preface to volume =50= (1847). No one can fail to marvel at

the energy and optimism required to push the Journal forward when

conditions must have been so difficult and encouragement so scanty. He

says (pp. iii, iv):

This Journal first appeared in July, 1818, and in June, 1819, the

first volume of four numbers and 448 pages was completed. This scale

of publication, originally deemed sufficient, was found inadequate to

receive all the communications, and as the receipts proved

insufficient to sustain the expenses, the work, having but three

hundred and fifty subscribers, was, at the end of the year, abandoned

by the publishers.

An unprofitable enterprise not being attractive to the trade, ten

months elapsed before another arrangement could be carried into

effect, and, therefore, No. 1 of vol. =2= was not published until

April, 1820. The new arrangement was one of mutual responsibility for

the expenses, but the Editor was constrained nevertheless to pledge

his own personal credit to obtain from a bank the funds necessary to

begin again, and from this responsibility he was, for a series of

years, seldom released. The single volume per annum being found

insufficient for the communications, two volumes a year were afterward

published, commencing with the second volume.

The publishers whose names appear on the title page of the four numbers

of the first volume are “J. Eastburn & Co., Literary Rooms, Broadway,

New York” and “Howe & Spalding, New Haven.” For the second volume and

those immediately following the corresponding statement “printed and

published by S. Converse [New Haven] for the Editor.”

Silliman adds (p. iv):

At the conclusion of vol. =10=, in February, 1826, the work was again

left upon the hands of its Editor; all its receipts had been absorbed

by the expenses, and it became necessary now to pay a heavy sum to the

retiring publisher, as an equivalent for his copies of previous

volumes, as it was deemed necessary either to control the work

entirely or to abandon it. The Editor was not willing to think of the

latter, especially as he was encouraged by public approbation, and was

cheered onward in his labors by eminent men both at home and abroad,

and he saw distinctly that the Journal was rendering service not only

to science and the arts, but to the reputation of his country. He

reflected, moreover, that in almost every valuable enterprise

perseverance in effort is necessary to success. He being now sole

proprietor, a new arrangement was made for a single year, the

publishers being at liberty, at the end of that time, to retire, and

the Editor to resume the Journal should he prefer that course.

The latter alternative he adopted, taking upon himself the entire

concern, including both the business and the editorial duties, and of

course, all the correspondence and accounts. From that time the work

has proceeded without interruption, two volumes per annum having been

published for the last twenty years; and its pecuniary claims ceased

to be onerous, although its means have never been large....

Later in the same preface he adds (p. xiv):

It may be interesting to our readers to know something of the

patronage of the Journal. It has never reached one thousand paying

subscribers, and has rarely exceeded seven or eight hundred—for many

years it fluctuated between six and seven hundred.

It has been far from paying a reasonable editorial compensation; often

it has paid nothing, and at present it does little more than pay its

bills. The number of engravings and the extra labor in printer’s

composition, cause it to be an expensive work, while its patronage is

limited.

It is difficult at this date to give any adequate statement of the

amount of encouragement and active assistance given to Silliman by his

scientific colleagues in New Haven and elsewhere—a subject earlier

alluded to. It is fortunately possible, however, to acknowledge the

generous aid received by the Journal in the early days from a source

near at hand. It has already been noted in another place that the

dawning activity of science at New Haven was recognized by the founding

of the “Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences,” formally established

at New Haven in 1799 and the third scientific body to be organized in

this country. From the beginning of the Journal in 1818, the Connecticut

Academy freely gave its support both in papers for publication and at

least on one occasion later it gave important financial aid. Upon the

occasion of the celebration of the centennial anniversary of the Academy

on October 11, 1899, Professor, later Governor, Baldwin, the president

of the Academy, discusses this subject in some detail. He says in part:

To support his [Silliman’s] undertaking, a vote had been passed in

February [1818], “that the Committee of Publication may allow such of

the Academy’s papers as they think proper, to be published in Mr.

Silliman’s Scientific Journal.”

Free use was made of this authority, and a large part of the contents

of the Journal was for many years drawn from this source. In some

cases this fact was noted in publication;[2] but in most it was

not....

In 1826, when the Journal was in great need of financial support, the

Academy further voted to pay for a year the cost of printing such of

its papers as might be published in it. In Baldwin’s Annals of Yale

College, published in 1831, it is described as a publication

“honorable to the science of our common country,” and having “an

additional value as being adopted as the acknowledged organ of the

Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences.”

Many active campaigns were carried on over the country through paid

agents to obtain new subscribers for the Journal and it was doubtless

due to these efforts that the nominal subscription list was, at times,

as already noted, relatively large as compared with that of a later

date. The new subscribers in many cases, however, did not remain

permanently interested, often failed to pay their bills, and the

uncertain and varying demand upon the supply of printed copies was

doubtless one reason why many single numbers became early out of print.

An interesting sidelight is thrown upon the efforts of Silliman to

interest the public in his work, at its beginning, by a letter to the

editor from Thomas Jefferson, then seventy-five years of age. The writer

is indebted to Mr. Robert B. Adam of Buffalo for a copy of this letter

and its interest justifies its being reproduced here entire. The letter

is as follows:

Monticello, Apr. 11. ’18.

A century of science in America · 第 15 / 45 题