Issued with Bulletin, July, 1894]

The Capital Laws were printed at Cambridge in 1642, probably under the

same restriction, as to number; and, as printed evidence, open to the

same construction as the Oath. Whatever the purpose, however, it had

been forestalled some four years earlier when the Capital Laws were

re-printed in London in a folio broadside. The copy in the British

Museum bears the Colophon: “Printed first in New-England, and re-printed

in London for Ben. Allen in Popes-Head Allen [_sic_] 1643.”

Fourthly, a relation of that story of Jonas verbatim as it was

delivered to me in writing by a Gentleman that was then a passenger

in the ship.

“When the first ship that came this year 1646 from New-England, was

almost ready to come from thence; Mr. Cotton in his Thursday-Lecture

at Boston, preached out of that Scripture, Cant. 2, 15. Take us the

little Foxes, &c. In his uses took occasion to say, That if any

shall carry any Writings, Complaints against the people of God in

that Country it would be a Jonas in the ship. * * He also advised

the Ship-Master, that if storms did arise, to search if they had not

in any Chest or Trunk any such Jonas aboard, which if you find (said

he) I do not advise you to throw the persons over-board, but the

Writings; or words to that effect. Whereupon, having great storms

(as could not be otherwise expected) some of the Passengers

remembering Mr. Cotton’s Sermon, it seems were much affected with

what he had said; and a woman amongst them came up from between the

decks about Midnight, or after, in a distracted passionate manner to

Mr. William Vassall who lay in the great Cabin, but for the present

was in the Sterage-door-way looking abroad: she earnestly desired

him, if there were any Jonas in the ship, that as Mr. Cotton had

directed it might be thrown over-board, with many broken expressions

to that purpose. He asked her why she came to him? and she said

because it was thought that he had some Writings against the people

of God: but he answered her, He had nothing but a Petition to the

Parliament that they might enjoy the liberty of English subjects,

and that could be no Jonas; and that if the best of New-Englands

friends could shew him any evil in that, he would not prefer it.

After this she went into the great Cabin to Mr. Tho. Fowle in like

distracted manner; who told her he had nothing but the Copy of

Petition which himself and others had presented to the Court at

Boston; and showed, and read it to her, and then told her, That if

she and others thought that to be the cause of the storm, she and

they might do what they would with it; but he professed that he saw

no evil in it, neither was his Conscience troubled with it. So she

took it and carried it between Decks to them from whom she came, and

they agreed to throw it over-board and it was thrown over-board: but

the storm did not leave us upon the throwing of the Paper over-board

as it is reported; for they had many great storms after that; much

lesse was the great and wonderfull deliverance which by Gods mercy

he gave unto them from shipwrack and drowning at the Isles of Silly,

upon the throwing of that Writing over-board; for that was thrown

over long before, at least 14 dayes. Also the error is the more in

this, That the report is that it was the petition to the Parliament

that was thrown over-board; and it was only a Copy of a Petition to

their own Court at Boston, and the Petition to the Parliament was

still in the ship, together with another copy of that which was

thrown over-board, and other writings of that nature, some of which

are printed in this book, and were as well saved as their lives and

other goods, and are here in London to be seen and made use of in

convenient time.”

It is true that at any time in the intervening years of a quarter of a

century I could have written to the British Museum authorities and been

sure of a courteous reply; but the matter seemed too important to be

settled in so prosaic a way. This, and the hope that sometime I might be

able to determine the matter personally, and achieve the honor that

would attach to its discovery, deterred me.

I suppose that men of all professions, in their callings, feel an

unwonted glow in the achievement of some object; but I know of no

greater joy than that which fills the lover of books when his long

search for a rare book is rewarded. Then it is that you seem to enter

into the holy of holies of delight, when the whole body thrills with

suppressed emotions, the eyes moisten, and the trembling hand stretched

out to take the volume does so with a touch which is almost a caress.

The feeling, I think, must be somewhat akin to the “buck fever” of the

deer hunter, whose mind and shaking limbs refuse to function, as he

looks into the luminous eyes, and notes the startled look, and graceful

beauty of his prey, until it has bounded into safety in the forest. Why,

I reasoned with myself, should I give to another the pleasure of these

emotions which were mine by right of discovery.

The opportunity of voyaging to England, which I had so long looked

forward to, did not come to me until the Spring of the present year, and

the pleasant anticipations with which I set out were comparable in my

own mind with those which must have animated the Knights of Arthur’s

Round Table in their quest for the holy grail. The morning after my

arrival in London found me an early visitor at the British Museum. The

preliminaries of admittance to the Reading-Room are not difficult, and

are soon over with, and I found myself within the great rotunda, its

walls lined in tiers with what is best in the literatures of the world,

and from which has gone out so much that is worth while in English

literature. From the Catalogue I filled out slips for some half dozen

works, artfully to conceal the one uppermost in my mind, handed them in

at the desk, and returned to my chosen seat to await with such calmness

as I could command the culmination of years of desire. Heeding the

legend that when the grail was approached by any one not perfectly pure

it vanished from sight; and that to be qualified to discover it one must

be perfectly chaste in thought and act, I endeavored to prepare myself

for its appearance. Somewhere I have read of an Oriental visionary who

attained a high degree of saintly perfection by fixing his gaze

steadfastly for hours upon his navel, which a growing embonpoint made an

easy thing to do, and I sought for holiness in the same way.

In time the white slips of my wants came fluttering back to me by

messengers, all marked, very properly for security on account of rarity,

that they could only be consulted in the North Library, until all were

in but the one most desired. Then followed a much longer wait and

then—the slip was handed back to me with a notation that I had given a

wrong shelf-mark! Gone in an instant were all the perfectly pure and

chaste thoughts with which I had been regaling myself while I was

apparently looking at the wrong button on my vest. I think I could have

stood the blow better if it had been that hoary old fiction of careless

assistants that it was “out”, but this is a boon denied to any assistant

in the British Museum, where nothing is allowed to go out. A comparison

with the printed Catalogue showed an exact correspondence, and I sought

the Superintendent of the Reading-Room, who assured me that the matter

would have his personal attention; and for the rest of the day I busied

myself with my other wants in the North Library without any word of the

missing broadside reaching me. That evening, in communion with myself, I

determined to throw off the mask of secrecy and frankly confide the

importance of my quest to the Keeper of the Printed Books—the somewhat

expressive and imposing title of the Librarian of the British Museum.

Before calling upon him I sought as an introducer Henry N. Stevens—the

worthy son of an illustrious father who follows closely in his footsteps

as the best authority on early printed American books in Europe—at his

shop across the street from the imposing Museum building, and to him I

told my story. As I proceeded his interest grew, and before I had

finished he excitedly grasped my arm with one hand and his hat with the

other, exclaiming: “Come with me. This is not a subject for underlings,”

and rushed me across the street without pause until we were in the

sanctum sanctorum of the learned and accomplished Keeper, Alfred W.

Pollard. And to him I told my simple tale, and asked his assistance. Mr.

Pollard is himself a bibliographer of note in his special field, and my

story was not without interest to him, but he refused to share my belief

that the missing broadside was what I supposed it to be, laying much

stress upon the black-letter feature as proof of its English origin. The

unsuccessful search for the missing broadside had evidently been called

to his notice, and the failure to produce anything in the millions of

books catalogued in that vast collection, he considered a challenge to

the efficiency of himself and his staff of assistants. A few days later,

he acknowledged failure; but gave me the interesting information that in

tracing the broadside back to its accession he had found that it was

acquired by the Museum in the year 1865, and formed part of a bundle of

miscellaneous matter, being considered of so little importance as not

even to have been mentioned in the contents of the bundle. Printing of

the letter F of the Catalogue was completed in 1888, and since that time

an expansion of the classification of books upon the shelves had been

made, from which dated its disappearance. He would not, however,

discontinue his efforts to find it. After apologizing for giving him a

“bad half-hour,” which only the importance of the broadside excused, our

second interview ended. On my last day in London, I went again with Mr.

Stevens to call on Mr. Pollard about the matter, and told him that I had

made my arrangements to fly from London to Paris on the morrow, and

asked him if these old eyes of mine were never to behold the holy grail.

“In black-letter?” he queried, touching the weak spot in my armor. “In

duodecimo!” I countered, pointing to the rent in his own. And the third

interview ended with his assurance that the search would go on until the

missing broadside was found.

And there the matter rests, very much in the condition of the story of

the cook who asked the skipper: “Is any thing lost when you know where

it is?” And to the skipper’s gruff response, “Of course not,” he

pleasantly replied: “I am glad to know that our only iron soup kettle

wasn’t lost when it fell over-board into the Bay.”

Through the courtesy of our fellow-members, Henry Edwards Huntington,

Esquire, and the accomplished bibliographer and librarian of his

unrivaled collection of books and art, George Watson Cole, the Society

is permitted to give a reproduction from the only known copy of “The

Book of General Lawes and Libertyes concerning the Inhabitants of the

Massachusetts”—the long-lost Code of 1648. No copy or fragment of a copy

was known to be extant for over two hundred and fifty years, when, in

1906, this copy was discovered in a small private library in England,

and was sold to the late Edmund Dwight Church for the highest price ever

paid for an American printed book—a record which is not likely to be

surpassed. The almost miraculous recovery of this volume, will, I have

given my reasons to hope, sometime have a counterpart in the recovery of

the only known copy of the first work printed in the United States of

America—The Oath of a Free man. From the year 1641, this bore the

abbreviated title of the

Oaths of Allegiance in Colonial New England · 第 22 / 52 题