The women who have been running for office in those Western States have

drawn the line on kissing babies, saying that they are too well versed

in hygiene to commit that crime. As has been remarked, women are

entirely too much given to sentiment to be allowed to vote.

* * * * *

Anti-suffrage literature declares that the enfranchisement of women will

“efface the natural differentiation of function between the two sexes.”

Oh, no, it won’t! Nature can’t be effaced and the differentiation will

go right on differentiating just the same.

* * * * *

What a queer way they have in Great Britain of encouraging matrimony!

There are about a million more women than men, but when the Canadian

government begged that some of the women might be sent over as wives for

the English immigrants, the authorities in England vetoed it because the

women were needed to work in the cotton mills.

* * * * *

Perhaps in the U.S. women should not vote because they cannot fight but

the man in England who said this would have to run to cover.

* * * * *

“We believe that political equality will deprive us of special

privileges hitherto accorded us by law,” cry the anti-suffragists. How

very sad! Will they please name one or two special privileges that the

women have lost in those States where they can vote?

* * * * *

The government is closing all the saloons on the reservations to protect

the Indians, and the Southern Legislatures are passing drastic

temperance laws to protect the negroes. It seems to be left to the women

to demand measures for the protection of the white men.

* * * * *

A Missouri legislator has introduced a bill that the buttons on the back

of a woman’s dress shall be as large as a silver quarter. Some time when

those women legislators out West cannot find anything else to do they

will introduce a bill that men shall cease wearing any buttons at all on

the back and cuffs of their coat.

* * * * *

The Anti-Suffrage Association is to be congratulated on the latest

contribution to its literature by Abdul Hamid, the deposed Sultan of

Turkey. There is such a similarity between his opinions on woman

suffrage and Mrs. Humphry Ward’s that it certainly is either a case of

plagiarism or two souls with but a single thought.

* * * * *

Harvard University has taken off the ban and allowed a speech on woman

suffrage within its sacred walls. If the ban had remained on a little

longer it would not have been necessary to take it off.

* * * * *

Almost the last words of Baroness von Suttner before she sailed for home

were that there never would be peace here until the women had a vote.

The men could have told her that as soon as she landed in the United

States.

* * * * *

For many days before Easter, the dispatches said, the Cleveland

suffragists trimmed hats to be sold for the “cause.” Go to! It would be

utterly impossible for a woman to believe in suffrage and know how to

trim a hat.

* * * * *

Kansas women say that they have long been accustomed to masculine

chivalry, as they have had the municipal vote for a quarter of a

century; but since they got the full suffrage they are so overwhelmed

with attentions from the men that they can hardly resist a political

flirtation.

* * * * *

Strange, isn’t it, how Government offices, public schools and the rest

penalize matrimony, and then when women ask for the suffrage the

opponents shriek aloud that it will destroy the desire for marriage?

Doesn’t it ever occur to them that the loss of all these business

opportunities might have this effect? Husbands are nice, but oh, you

salary!

* * * * *

Beatrice Harraden learned at a recent legislative hearing in Westminster

that “the women impressed the statesmen but the statesmen did not in the

least impress the women.” We have always seen this in our country but we

never let the “statesmen” know it.

* * * * *

The belated action of the New York anti-suffragists, in opening their

little headquarters on Fifth Avenue a few days before the big suffrage

parade “to offset any impression it might make,” recalls the careful

housewife, who exclaimed when she saw Niagara Falls, “Oh, that reminds

me—I left the kitchen faucet running!”

* * * * *

It is perfectly proper for mothers of wealth and social position to

employ nurses and governesses for their children; but when a business or

professional woman does the same, society at large goes into hysterics

over her poor, neglected offspring. If the mother is off playing bridge

and attending “teas,” it is all right; but if she is away earning a

salary it is all wrong.

* * * * *

When women wanted to be customs inspectors the authorities said they

could never, never climb the ladder on the side of a ship. Strange to

say the two women who demonstrated that it could easily be done were

both daughters of Presidents. It is odd how many obstacles can be placed

in the way when a woman wants a job with a salary attached!

* * * * *

Amherst College is to establish a chair of common sense. Great pity that

college isn’t co-educational!

* * * * *

“When women are elected to Congress, there will be no more secret

caucuses,” says a great daily. Since when have there been any of that

kind?

* * * * *

School inspectors in Russia have issued an order that no married woman

teacher can have more than two children. They have heard about the New

York board of education and gone them two better.

* * * * *

“Suffrage was begotten in Utah and Idaho by Mormonism,” says a syndicate

article sent forth by the Pennsylvania “anti” association. Oh, no; it

was “begotten” in Wyoming, when there wasn’t a Mormon in the Territory.

* * * * *

His name is Abnel—a German doctor who has made a discovery. “The world’s

well-being is threatened by the adoration of suffragists for dissolute

men. The clinging, domestic women are naturally attracted to strong

men.” Of course—the men would have to be strong to support their weight.

“But the women politicians have lost the selective instinct,” he says.

“They flutter toward the Don Juans like moths and are consumed before

they realize their own folly.” Yes, people notice this in those Western

States—a perfect holocaust as soon as women get the ballot. That is why

the Don Juans always vote against it—they would feel so dreadfully

helpless with all the women politicians fluttering toward them in order

to be consumed.

* * * * *

Which is likely to do more damage to the sweetly feminine character—to

stand at the polls all day and hand out coffee to voters, or to deposit

a ballot and then go home and attend to woman’s legitimate business?

* * * * *

A cardinal in Venice denounced the tight skirts women are wearing and

ordered them to do penance. They hastened to church the next day for the

purpose, but were obliged to perform their devotions standing!

* * * * *

The New Thought devotees have thought out a new kind of marriage—“a

mating of harmonious vibrations.” But that has been the trouble with

marriage in late years—the parties have vibrated among too many people.

* * * * *

A Chicago suffrage club has just been formed, to which only young,

unmarried women are eligible. It seems only yesterday that girls were

solemnly admonished that if they advocated woman suffrage no man would

marry them, but they can’t be scared that way now.

* * * * *

Richard Le Gallienne has gone Omar Khayyam’s “a loaf of bread, a jug of

wine and thou, singing in the wilderness underneath a bough,” one

better. He will be perfectly satisfied “if only she and I can go,

walking forever through the snow.” Maybe he would, but we think the lady

would want something warmer even than Richard’s poetry.

* * * * *

There was an increase of fifteen per cent. in marriages in Chicago the

first six months after the Legislature granted woman suffrage. That may

not have been the cause but if the figures had gone the other way there

would have had to be a special session to repeal it.

* * * * *

The New York _Times_ suggests that “the suffragists have the right of

petition and by exercising it in a proper manner they may advance their

cause.” They have been doing this for sixty-five years. If there is any

new style in petitions they will be very thankful for a diagram and a

paper pattern.

* * * * *

Anti-suffragists are protesting against having that vote for suffrage at

the biennial called unanimous. All right; say that twenty-one hundred

votes were cast, and seventy of them were negative—thirty in favor to

one opposed—and that is just about the way the woman’s vote would stand

throughout the country.

* * * * *

Pittsburgh is to have a saloon exclusively for women, as they have been

crowded out of the others by the men. Promoters of the new idea should

go to New York and inquire at the Hotel Vanderbilt, which started out

with a beautiful “bar” for women, but a month later it was closed for

lack of patronage and reopened as a much needed annex to the large and

flourishing bar for men.

* * * * *

Prof. Spencer Baldwin, of Boston University, is an anti-suffragist. He

doesn’t like the new woman—“androgynous hybrid,” that is what he calls

her. It’s up to the professor to find an anti-toxin.

* * * * *

In the United States the women say they won’t pay their taxes if they

can’t vote and in London they say they won’t pay their rent. Our

government can compromise with them by giving the suffrage but what is

their landlord to do?

* * * * *

The head of the “vocational bureau” in Boston thinks the time may come

when graduation certificates in fathercraft and mothercraft will be

issued by the public schools. But if the holders don’t get aboard the

matrimonial craft what good will these do?

* * * * *

Hampton Court has been closed to the public for a long time through fear

of the suffragettes; but the government has at last evolved a scheme—it

will open the palace and charge a shilling admission! How clever! But

suppose a suffragette should be able to borrow a shilling?

* * * * *

Woman suffragists campaigning in Wisconsin came across a man whose wife

has supported the family for years by walking the tight rope, and he

announced that he should vote against the suffrage amendment because a

woman’s place is at home. There are a vast number just like him there,

judging from the election returns.

* * * * *

Under a woman school superintendent in Rowan County, Kentucky, the

number of illiterates in two years has been reduced from 1,152 to 23,

and these are physically incompetent. One of the great dangers of equal

suffrage is that women might aspire to hold office!

* * * * *

The women of Nevada have been holding a “sacrifice week” to raise money

for their suffrage campaign, as also have women in the neighboring

States to help them. By the way, can anybody recall any special

sacrifice to earn the right that has been made by the men who are now

doing the voting in the United States?

* * * * *

A Johns Hopkins professor says that in twenty years’ experience with

over a thousand graduates of both sexes he has failed to discover the

inferior brains of women which he hears so much about. He should apply

to the anti-suffragists, who not only can tell him all about them but

can furnish him with plenty of specimens.

* * * * *

Secretary Daniels declares that “bachelors are encumberers of the earth”

and offers the use of the United States navy to scatter their ranks. As

the most of them are land animals the services of the War Department

would be more effective. Meanwhile it is safe to say that few bachelors

pass the age of fifty without the inner consciousness that they ought to

be blown up or sent to the bottom of the sea.

* * * * *

At the next election after California women were enfranchised, the vote

of the State increased 313,883. As has often been remarked, women

wouldn’t use the suffrage if they had it.

* * * * *

“The men are to put on their clothes with a shoe horn,” is the latest

fashion edict. We shall not believe it till we see it, and even then we

shall look the other way.

* * * * *

Some “bootleggers” who are to be tried before a jury of women in

Colorado are said to be feeling very anxious. Why so? The objection to

women as judges and jurors has always been that they are too sentimental

and emotional to mete out justice.

* * * * *

The illogical minds of women cannot comprehend why it is, when a

congressman’s constituents indicate that they don’t want him to

represent them in the government any longer, that same government

immediately puts him on the pay roll in another place.

* * * * *

The male editors of the two leading fashion magazines are using columns

of space in argument whether the women of this country shall adopt

American or French styles. The National Association of Master Bakers, at

their recent convention, adopted a resolution in favor of woman

suffrage, giving as a reason that if women go into politics they won’t

have time to stay at home and bake bread. It is really outrageous the

way women are crowding into the fields of labor that belong to men!

* * * * *

“It is a wise child that knows its own father,” but in France they have

just passed a law which will permit the mother to make some inquiries.

* * * * *

The new invention of making rubber tires out of a substance extracted

from whiskey suggests that it would be an excellent thing on most of the

“joy” rides if the whiskey was in the tires instead of the automobile.

* * * * *

The public-school teachers who want the suffrage have raised the cry,

“Can disfranchised teachers train citizens?” Of course they can, so long

as they can be had for half the price that a man would charge for the

job.

* * * * *

A Democratic candidate for congressman-at-large in Illinois, who is an

anti-suffragist, is making his canvass on the platform: “A husband and a

home for every woman.” As over twenty-five hundred husbands in Chicago

alone last year abandoned their wives, he should add another plank that

if he is elected all husbands will stick to home and family.

* * * * *

Just as the Anti-Suffrage Association issued its bulletin announcing

that there was no favorable movement in the South, the Georgia

Federation of Labor strongly indorsed the suffragists and the Atlanta

_Constitution_ declared editorially, “Success seems about to crown their

efforts.” The antis are playing in hard luck; no sooner do they get

their type all nicely set up than the other side does something or other

that knocks it into “pi.”

* * * * *

One of those gifted male lecturers who know everything says, “We have

new models of automobiles every year; we should work out new models of

the antiquated family machine.” Go ahead; women have no objection as

long as they are permitted to sit at the steering wheel.

* * * * *

“Marse Henry” Watterson says he has found only three classes of women

who want the suffrage: “Those who wish to exploit their own interests,

those who are soured on life and the brainless sheep who think it is

fashionable.” Maybe it is like that in Kentucky, but the men in some

States have found several other kinds.

* * * * *

The “bachelor tax” which the Montana legislators want to impose varies

from $2.50 to $100 per annum, but the majority think $5 would be about

right. It seems like cruelty to animals to put on any tax at all when

there are more than twice as many men as women over twenty-one years old

in the State and those across the border are in just as bad a fix.

* * * * *

Emile Deschamps tells us in his new book that the American woman cannot

keep her husband’s love because she does not return it. But if she

returned it of course she couldn’t keep it. Funny how many things these

foreigners find out about American women never discovered by American

men, who seem to be well enough satisfied not to go wife hunting in any

other country.

* * * * *

Almost every organization in the “campaign” States which stands for

anything that ought to be stood for has indorsed the suffrage amendment.

Will the antis name one which has declared against it—that is, has

declared publicly?

* * * * *

It’s funny how every woman who does anything nowadays, from climbing a

steeple to taking the prize at a beauty show, is described as “a leading

suffragist.” Don’t the “antis” ever get married or die or have triplets

or do anything worth notice?

* * * * *

One striking difference between the United States Senate and the British

House of Commons is that when a deputation of women suffragists make a

call the Senators receive them with open arms and the Commoners shout

for the police.

* * * * *

The nurses who cared for Mr. Roosevelt in the Chicago hospital have been

so deluged with offers of marriage they have had to go into seclusion.

It’s such a very funny way men have of showing their appreciation of a

woman by offering to marry her!

* * * * *

The women in China, it is said, have now advanced so far that they are

held accountable for their crimes instead of their male relatives. Here,

too. It used to be the law in many of our States that a wife could not

be punished for a crime committed in the presence of her husband. Having

a husband was considered sufficient punishment for her—or at least that

seemed to be just as good a reason as any for the law.

* * * * *

Captain Amundson, the antarctic discoverer, who comes from Norway where

women vote, says of the English suffragettes: “They are quite right, and

I’d like to help them in their fight for freedom.” The captain had

better confine himself to easy jobs like finding the South Pole.

* * * * *

The anti-suffrage headquarters in Trenton, N. J., have a big placard in

the window, asking, “Why the Increase in Juvenile Crime in Denver?”

Because, according to the chief of police, “juvenile crime in Denver has

decreased nearly two hundred per cent. in the last ten years”—that’s

why. It is amazing how the anti-suffragists manage to acquire so much

misinformation.

* * * * *

In Colonel Roosevelt’s latest pronunciamento on the question of

suffrage, he says that he “always believed it exactly as much the right

of women as men, but he only favored it ‘tepidly’ until his association

with such women as Jane Addams,” etc. Is the colonel quite sure that he

was not slightly influenced by those 2,000,000 women out West with the

vote already in their hands?

* * * * *

At the recent suffrage debate in Congress a great deal was said about

women “trailing their skirts in the mire of politics” by some of the

befo’-the-wah members. Evidently the old gentlemen hadn’t learned that

trailing skirts went out of fashion years ago and now the men can’t make

the political mud deep enough to touch the hem of the up-to-date

dresses.

* * * * *

The “antis” appeal to the legislators to “listen to logic instead of the

dropping of ballots.” Impossible! Compared with the thud of those

ballots all other noises sound like utter silence.

* * * * *

Grand opera was sung to fourteen lions at the zoo in Berlin and they

didn’t do any violence to the singers. Audiences in many countries have

been just as forbearing.

* * * * *

A society has been organized in New York to arouse in fathers more

interest in their children. Perhaps they have already sufficient

interest but in many cases it has to be spread out over such a large

surface.

* * * * *

Miss Dora Keen, the Pennsylvania woman who recently climbed to the top

of Harvard Glacier in Alaska believes that she has the physical strength

to cast a ballot, but the men of her State insist that she must stay at

home and let them protect her from being jostled at the polls.

* * * * *

All sorts of explanations have been made as to why those Kansas women,

when they found they had won the suffrage, built a bonfire and threw

their old hats in it. Perhaps they concluded that, now they were voters,

they must act as silly as men. Maybe they had such swelled heads that

the hats wouldn’t fit. Possibly they thought they could get new ones on

election bets. But most likely they only wanted to show that now their

hats are in the ring and they are ready for the fray.

* * * * *

The _Woman’s Journal_ says the devil and the anti-suffragists will be

busy all summer. Why both?

* * * * *

Now 12,000 bakers are going on a strike. It didn’t used to be that way

when the nation’s wives and mothers baked the bread.

* * * * *

A National Desertion Bureau has been incorporated to try to settle all

the domestic quarrels in the country. There won’t be enough of that

bureau left to kindle a fire on a marriage altar.

* * * * *

“Women must not have the suffrage,” says an authorized document of the

antis, “because Max Eastman’s wife goes by her maiden name.” Where does

she “go?” That is much more to the point, if she is to decide the

question.

* * * * *

“On one side,” says a Pennsylvania official in the Anti-Suffrage

Association, “are the mother and the home; on the other the woman

seeking the place man occupies as the framer of constitutions and the

administrator of civil-government.” Seems as if we know of several men

who don’t frame constitutions or administer any kind of government, and

a good many women who can’t stay on the side of the home because they

have to go out and earn the money to have a home. Men and women can’t be

divided like goats and sheep, and if they could, there is no valid

reason why the voting booths should all be on one side of the line.

* * * * *

There is a great cry in Washington about retiring the superannuated

clerks for the good of the service. What is impairing the service is the

large number of inefficient chiefs of departments who are drawing big

salaries while their poorly paid women assistants do the work.

* * * * *

For the second time a Radcliffe girl has won the $100 prize open to

students of all colleges for the best essay on municipal government. Oh,

yes, women may be very good on the theory, but only men have the

practical knowledge. Just observe what a shining success they have made

of city governments!

* * * * *

The way women will lose the respect of men when they get a vote was

illustrated in Arizona, where as soon as women were enfranchised the men

nominated the president of the Suffrage Association for State senator,

and she received six hundred more votes than any other candidate on the

ticket.

* * * * *

_Votes for Women_ says that the Peers, when they argued against woman

suffrage, should have been clothed in skins with feathers in their hair,

and Lord Curzon, when he moved the rejection of the bill, should have

begun by dancing around the woolsack and singing an incantation. We must

protest against this libel on the American Indian; he would scorn to

take an Englishman’s attitude against the rights of women.

* * * * *

The State of Washington has the lowest death rate of any in the country;

New Hampshire the highest. Moral—Go West, where women vote.

* * * * *

There have been but four “champion” typewriters, and three of these were

women. As soon as the machine was invented women were at the keyboard,

and yet you hear men operators complaining that women have “usurped”

their positions!

* * * * *

When that International Congress of Women Voters meets in San Francisco

next summer, there will be a fine chance to observe how the suffrage has

unsexed women and destroyed the feminine instincts in at least nine

countries.

* * * * *

Whenever anybody issues the edict that women have not the physical

strength to vote some of them immediately shin up a flagpole on a

fifty-story building and take a header off the Brooklyn Bridge for a

moving-picture show, loop the loop in an airship and climb the highest

mountain in the world.

* * * * *

Civil Service Commissioner McIlhenny says the women government employes

may march in the suffrage parade as individuals but not as clerks.

Thanks Mr. Commissioner! That is what the suffragists are asking for—to

be considered as individuals instead of belonging to somebody or

something. But they can’t join a suffrage club, he says. As the man in

prison answered his lawyer who said, “They can’t put you in jail for

that”—“They already hev.”

* * * * *

An anti-Tammany bureau of a thousand speakers is being organized in New

York to talk the “tiger” to death. Right there is where they need the

help of women.

* * * * *

Medical statistics from Paris announce that men show most brilliancy

from forty to fifty-six. This holds out a great deal of hope for a lot

of men we know who are under forty.

* * * * *

“There is no reform legislation in any suffrage State which is not

duplicated in those where women cannot vote,” says the “antis.” If that

is so they will have to find some other excuse for beating the

suffragists to the polls as soon as they get a chance.

* * * * *

The United States Senate has made an appropriation to erect a splendid

memorial in Washington in recognition of the service rendered by women

during the Civil War. By all means; and then don’t deny the franchise to

women because they cannot serve their country in time of war.

* * * * *

Suffrage snapshots · 第 4 / 5 段