FROM THURSDAY MAY 10, TO THURSDAY MAY 17, 1711.

_------Quem cur distringere coner,

Tutus ab infestis latronibus?_[2]

I never let slip an opportunity of endeavouring to convince the world,

that I am not partial, and to confound the idle reproach of my being

hired or directed what to write in defence of the present ministry,[3] or

for detecting the practices of the former. When I first undertook this

paper, I firmly resolved, that if ever I observed any gross neglect,

abuse or corruption in the public management, which might give any just

offence to reasonable people, I would take notice of it with that

innocent boldness which becomes an honest man, and a true lover of his

country; at the same time preserving the respect due to persons so highly

entrusted by so wise and excellent a Queen. I know not how such a liberty

might have been resented; but I thank God there has been no occasion

given me to exercise it; for I can safely affirm, that I have with the

utmost rigour, examined all the actions of the present ministry, as far

as they fall under general cognizance, without being able to accuse them

of one ill or mistaken step. Observing indeed some time ago, that seeds

of dissension[4] had been plentifully scattered from a certain corner,

and fearing they began to rise and spread, I immediately writ a paper on

the subject; which I treated with that warmth I thought it required: but

the prudence of those at the helm soon prevented this growing evil; and

at present it seems likely to have no consequences.

I have had indeed for some time a small occasion of quarrelling, which I

thought too inconsiderable for a formal subject of complaint, though I

have hinted at it more than once. But it is grown at present to as great

a height, as a matter of that nature can possibly bear; and therefore I

conceive it high time that an effectual stop should be put to it. I have

been amazed at the flaming licentiousness of several weekly papers, which

for some months past, have been chiefly employed in barefaced

scurrilities against those who are in the greatest trust and favour with

the Qu[een], with the first and last letters of their names frequently

printed; or some periphrasis describing their station, or other

innuendoes, contrived too plain to be mistaken. The consequence of which

is, (and it is natural it should be so) that their long impunity hath

rendered them still more audacious.

At this time I particularly intend a paper called the "Medley"; whose

indefatigable, incessant railings against me, I never thought convenient

to take notice of, because it would have diverted my design, which I

thought was of public use.[5] Besides, I never yet observed that writer,

or those writers, (for it is every way a "Medley") to argue against any

one material point or fact that I had advanced, or make one fair

quotation. And after all, I knew very well how soon the world grow weary

of controversy. It is plain to me, that three or four hands at least have

been joined at times in that worthy composition; but the outlines as well

as the finishing, seem to have been always the work of the same pen, as

it is visible from half a score beauties of style inseparable from it.

But who these Meddlers are, or where the judicious leaders have picked

them up, I shall never go about to conjecture: factious rancour, false

wit, abandoned scurrility, impudent falsehood, and servile pedantry,

having so many fathers, and so few to own them, that curiosity herself

would not be at the pains to guess. It is the first time I ever did

myself the honour to mention that admirable paper: nor could I imagine

any occasion likely to happen, that would make it necessary for me to

engage with such an adversary. This paper is weekly published, and as

appears by the number, has been so for several months, and is next to the

"Observator,"[6] allowed to be the best production of the party. Last

week my printer brought me that of May 7, Numb. 32. where there are two

paragraphs[7] relating to the Speaker of the House of Commons, and to Mr.

Harley; which, as little as I am inclined to engage with such an

antagonist, I cannot let pass, without failing in my duty to the public:

and if those in power will suffer such infamous insinuations to pass with

impunity, they act without precedent from any age or country of the

world.

I desire to open this matter, and leave the Whigs themselves to determine

upon it. The House of Commons resolved, _nemine contradicente_, that the

Speaker should congratulate Mr. Harley's escape and recovery[8] in the

name of the House, upon his first attendance on their service. This is

accordingly done; and the speech, together with the chancellor of the

exchequer's, are printed by order of the House.[9] The author of the

"Medley" takes this speech to task the very next week after it is

published, telling us, in the aforesaid paper, that the Speaker's

commending Mr. Harley, for being "an instrument of great good" to the

nation, was "ill-chosen flattery"; because Mr. Harley had brought the

"nation under great difficulties, to say no more:" He says, that when the

Speaker tells Mr. Harley, that Providence has "wonderfully preserved" him

"from some unparalleled attempts" (for that the "Medley" alludes to) he

only "revives a false and groundless calumny upon other men"; which is

"an instance of impotent, but inveterate malice,"[10] that makes him [the

Speaker] "still appear more vile and contemptible." This is an extract

from his first paragraph. In the next this writer says, that the

Speaker's "praying to God for the continuance of Mr. Harley's life, as an

invaluable blessing,[11] was a fulsome piece of insincerity, which

exposes him to shame and derision"; because he is "known to bear ill will

to Mr. Harley, to have an extreme bad opinion of him, and to think him an

obstructor of those fine measures he would bring about."

I now appeal to the Whigs themselves, whether a great minister of state,

in high favour with the Qu[een], and a Speaker of the House of Commons,

were ever publicly treated after so extraordinary a manner, in the most

licentious times? For this is not a clandestine libel stolen into the

world, but openly printed and sold, with the bookseller's name and place

of abode at the bottom. And the juncture is admirable, when Mr. H[arle]y

is generally believed upon the very point to be made an earl, and

promoted to the most important station of the kingdom:[12] nay, the very

marks of esteem he hath so lately received from the whole representative

body of the people, are called "ill-chosen flattery," and "a fulsome

piece of insincerity," exposing the donors "to shame and derision."

Does this intrepid writer think he has sufficiently disguised the matter,

by that stale artifice of altering the story, and putting it as a

supposed case? Did any man who ever saw the congratulatory speech, read

either of those paragraphs in the "Medley," without interpreting them

just as I have done? Will the author declare upon his great sincerity,

that he never had any such meaning? Is it enough, that a jury at

Westminster-Hall would, perhaps, not find him guilty of defaming the

Speaker and Mr. Harley in that paper? which however, I am much in doubt

of too; and must think the law very defective, if the reputation of such

persons must lie at the mercy of such pens. I do not remember to have

seen any libel, supposed to be writ with caution and double meaning, in

order to prevent prosecution, delivered under so thin a cover, or so

unartificially made up as this; whether it were from an apprehension of

his readers' dullness, or an effect of his own. He hath transcribed the

very phrases of the Speaker, and put them in a different character, for

fear they might pass unobserved, and to prevent all possibility of being

mistaken. I shall be pleased to see him have recourse to the old evasion,

and say, that I who make the application, am chargeable with the abuse:

let any reader of either party be judge. But I cannot forbear asserting,

as my opinion, that for a m[inist]ry to endure such open calumny, without

calling the author to account, is next to deserving it. And this is an

omission I venture to charge upon the present m[inist]ry, who are too apt

to despise little things, which however have not always little

consequences.

When this paper was first undertaken, one design, among others, was, to

_Examine_ some of those writings so frequently published with an evil

tendency, either to religion or government; but I was long diverted by

other enquiries, which I thought more immediately necessary, to

animadvert upon men's actions, rather than their speculations: to shew

the necessity there was of changing the ministry, that our constitution

in Church and State might be preserved; to expose some dangerous

principles and practices under the former administration, and prove by

many instances, that those who are now at the helm, are entirely in the

true interest of prince and people. This I may modestly hope, hath in

some measure been already done, sufficient to answer the end proposed,

which was to inform the ignorant and those at distance, and to convince

such as are not engaged in a party, from other motives than that of

conscience. I know not whether I shall have any appetite to continue this

work much longer; if I do, perhaps some time may be spent in exposing and

overturning the false reasonings of those who engage their pens on the

other side, without losing time in vindicating myself against their

scurrilities, much less in retorting them. Of this sort there is a

certain humble companion, a French _maître de langues_,[13] who every

month publishes an extract from votes, newspapers, speeches and

proclamations, larded with some insipid remarks of his own; which he

calls "The Political State of Great Britain:"[14] This ingenious piece he

tells us himself, is constantly translated into French, and printed in

Holland, where the Dutch, no doubt, conceive most noble sentiments of us,

conveyed through such a vehicle. It is observable in his account for

April, that the vanity, so predominant in many of his nation, has made

him more concerned for the honour of Guiscard, than the safety of Mr.

H[arle]y: And for fear we should think the worse of his country upon that

assassin's account,[15] he tells us, there have been more murders,

parricides and villanies, committed in England, than any other part of

the world. I cannot imagine how an illiterate foreigner, who is neither

master of our language, or indeed of common sense, and who is devoted to

a faction, I suppose, for no other reason, but his having more Whig

customers than Tories, should take it into his head to write politic

tracts of our affairs. But I presume, he builds upon the foundation of

having being called to an account for his insolence in one of his former

monthly productions,[16] which is a method that seldom fails of giving

some vogue to the foolishest composition. If such a work must be done, I

wish some tolerable hand would undertake it; and that we would not suffer

a little whiffling Frenchman to neglect his trade of teaching his

language to our children, and presume to instruct foreigners in our

politics.

[Footnote 1: No. 41 in the reprint. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 2: Horace, "Satires," II. i. 41-2.

"Safe it lies

Within the sheath, till villains round me rise."--P. FRANCIS.

[T.S.]]

[Footnote 3: See No. 40, _ante_, and note, p. 259. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 4: In "A Discourse of the Contests and Dissensions ... Athens

and Rome," 1701 (vol. i., pp. 227-270, of present edition). See also

Swift's reference to this pamphlet in his "Memoirs Relating to that

Change," etc. (vol. v., p. 379). [T.S.]]

[Footnote 5: "The Medley," under Maynwaring, with occasional help from

Addison and Steele, seems to have been published for the sole purpose

of replying to the "Examiner." No. 40 (July 2nd, 1711) begins: "The

'Examiner' is grown so insipid and contemptible that my acquaintance

are offended at my troubling myself about him." No. 45 (the final number,

August 6th, 1711) expresses the writer's "deep concern" for the loss of

his "dear friend 'The Examiner,' who has at once left the world and me,

quite unprovided for so great a blow." When the "Examiner" was revived by

W. Oldisworth in December, 1711, it was soon followed by a reappearance

of "The Medley." It started afresh with Numb. I. on March 3rd, 1712

(_i.e._ 1711/2), and continued until August 4th, 1712, the date of the

publication of Numb. XLV. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 6: See No. 16, _ante_, and note p. 85. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 7: The two paragraphs appeared in No. 32 of "The Medley," and

the writer introduces them by a reference to "praise and censure, which I

choose out of all the rest, because it only concerns the 'Examiner' to be

well instructed in them, he having no other business but to flatter the

new m[inistry], and abuse the old." The first paragraph runs:

"In the first place, whenever any body would praise another, all he can

say will have no weight or effect, if it be not true or probable. If

therefore, for example, my friend should take it into his head to commend

a man, _for having been an instrument of great good to a nation_, when in

truth that very person had brought that same nation under great

difficulties, to say no more; such ill-chosen flattery would be of no use

or moment, nor add the least credit to the person so commended. Or if he

should take that occasion to revive any false and groundless calumny upon

other men, or another party of men; such an instance of _impotent but

inveterate malice_, would make him still appear more vile and

contemptible. The reason of all which is, that what he said was neither

just, proper, nor real, and therefore must needs want the force of true

eloquence, which consists in nothing else but in well representing things

as they really are. I advise therefore my friend, before he praises any

more of his heroes, to learn the common rules of writing; and

particularly to read over and over a certain chapter in Aristotle's first

book of Rhetoric, where are given very proper and necessary directions,

_for praising a man who has done nothing that he ought to be praised

for_."

There is no reference here to the Speaker. The reference is to the

"Examiner"; nor is there any mention of Providence having wonderfully

preserved him from some unparalleled attempts.

The second paragraph runs:

"But the ancients did not think it enough for men to speak what was true

or probable, they required further that their orators should be heartily

in earnest; and that they should have all those motions and affections in

their own minds which they endeavoured to raise in others. He that

thinks, says Cicero, to warm others with his eloquence, must first be

warm himself. And Quintilian says, We must first be affected ourselves,

before we can move others. This made Pliny's panegyric upon Trajan so

well received by his hearers, because every body knew the wonderful

esteem and affection which he had for the person he commended: and

therefore, when he concluded with a prayer to Jupiter, that he would take

care of the life and safety of that great and good man, which he said

contained in it all other blessings; though the expression was so high,

it passed very well with those that heard him, as being agreeable to the

known sentiments and affection of the speaker. Whereas, if my friend

should be known to bear ill-will to another person, or to have an extreme

bad opinion of him, or to think him an abstractor of those fine measures

he would bring about, and should yet in one of his panegyrics pray to God

for the continuance of that very person's life, as '_an invaluable

blessing_'; such a fulsome piece of insincerity would only expose him to

shame and derision." [T.S.]]

[Footnote 8: The House of Commons resolved on April 11th, that the

Speaker should congratulate Mr. Harley when he was able to attend the

House. This was done on April 26th. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 9: The House of Commons, on April 27th, ordered, "That Mr.

Speaker be desired to print his congratulatory speech ... with the Answer

of Mr. Chancellor of the Exchequer to the same." [T.S.]]

[Footnote 10: The Speaker thanks God that Harley's enemies had "not been

able to accomplish what their inveterate, but impotent, malice, had

designed." [T.S.]]

[Footnote 11: The Speaker prayed that Providence might "continue still to

preserve so invaluable a life." [T.S.]]

[Footnote 12: Harley was appointed lord treasurer, May 30th, 1711, and

created Earl of Oxford, May 23rd. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 13: Abel Boyer (1667-1729), author of a French dictionary, a

French grammar, "History of William III.," "History of Queen Anne," "The

Political State," "The Post Boy" (1705-9), and many other works. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 14: "The Political State of Great Britain" was started in

January, 1710/1, and continued monthly until 1740. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 15: See No. 33, _ante_, and note, p. 207. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 16: Boyer appeared before the House of Lords, March 6th,

1710/1, and owned that he was the compiler of "The Political State of

Great Britain." He was kept in custody till March 12th, when he was

reprimanded, and discharged after he had paid his fees. His offence was

that "an account is pretended to be given of the Debates and Proceedings

of this House" ("Journals of House of Lords," xix). The third number of

"The Political State," Boyer issued on March 17th, giving his reason for

the delay in its appearance: "An unavoidable and unvoluntary avocation,

of which I may give you an account hereafter, has obliged me to write to

you a fortnight later than usual." [T.S.]]

The Prose Works of Jonathan Swift, D.D. — Volume 09 Contributions to The Tatler, The Examiner, The Spectator, and The Intelligencer · 第 111 / 133 题