FROM THURSDAY APRIL 12, TO THURSDAY APRIL 19, 1711.

_Semper causae eventorum magis movent quam ipsa eventa.[2]_

I am glad to observe, that several among the Whigs have begun very much

to change their language of late. The style is now among the reasonable

part of them, when they meet a man in business, or a Member of

Parliament; "Well, gentlemen, if you go on as you have hitherto done, we

shall no longer have any pretence to complain." They find, it seems, that

there have been yet no overtures made to bring in the Pretender, nor any

preparatory steps towards it. They read no enslaving votes, nor bills

brought in to endanger the subject. The indulgence to scrupulous

consciences,[3] is again confirmed from the throne, inviolably preserved,

and not the least whisper offered that may affect it. All care is taken

to support the war; supplies cheerfully granted, and funds readily

subscribed to, in spite of the little arts made use of to discredit them.

The just resentments of some, which are laudable in themselves, and which

at another juncture it might be proper to give way to, have been softened

or diverted by the calmness of others. So that upon the article of

present management, I do not see how any objection of weight can well be

raised.

However, our adversaries still allege, that this great success was wholly

unexpected, and out of all probable view. That in public affairs, we

ought least of all others, to judge by events; that the attempt of

changing a ministry, during the difficulties of a long war, was rash and

inconsiderate: That if the Qu[een] were disposed by her inclinations, or

from any personal dislike, for such a change, it might have been done

with more safety, in a time of peace: That if it had miscarried by any of

those incidents, which in all appearance might have intervened, the

consequences would perhaps have ruined the whole confederacy; and,

therefore, however it hath now succeeded, the experiment was too

dangerous to try.

But this is what we can by no means allow them. We never will admit

rashness or chance to have produced all this harmony and order. It is

visible to the world, that the several steps towards this change were

slowly taken, and with the utmost caution. The movers observed as they

went on, how matters would bear, and advanced no farther at first, than

so as they might be able to stop or go back, if circumstances were not

mature. Things were grown to such a height, that it was no longer the

question, whether a person who aimed at an employment, were a Whig or a

Tory, much less, whether he had merit or proper abilities for what he

pretended to: he must owe his preferment only to the favourites; and the

crown was so far from nominating, that they would not allow it a

negative. This, the Qu[een] was resolved no longer to endure, and began

to break into their prescription, by bestowing one or two places of

consequence,[4] without consulting her ephori; after they had fixed them

for others, and concluded as usually, that all their business was to

signify their pleasure to her M[ajest]y. But though the persons the

Qu[een] had chosen, were such as no objection could well be raised

against upon the score of party; yet the oligarchy took the alarm;[5]

their sovereign authority was, it seems, called in question; they grew

into anger and discontent, as if their undoubted rights were violated.

All former obligations to their sovereign now became cancelled; and they

put themselves upon the foot of people, who were hardly used after the

most eminent services.

I believe all men, who know any thing in politics, will agree, that a

prince thus treated, by those he has most confided in, and perpetually

loaded with his favours, ought to extricate himself as soon as possible;

and is then only blamable in his choice of time, when he defers one

minute after it is in his power; because, from the monstrous

encroachments of exorbitant avarice and ambition, he cannot tell how long

it may continue to be so. And it will be found, upon enquiring into

history, that most of those princes, who have been ruined by favourites,

have owed their misfortune to the neglect of early remedies; deferring to

struggle till they were quite sunk.

The Whigs are every day cursing the ungovernable rage, the haughty pride,

and unsatiable covetousness of a certain person,[6] as the cause of their

fall; and are apt to tell their thoughts, that one single removal might

have set all things right. But the interests of that single person, were

found, upon experience, so complicated and woven with the rest, by love,

by awe, by marriage, by alliance, that they would rather confound heaven

and earth, than dissolve such an union.

I have always heard and understood, that a king of England, possessed of

his people's hearts, at the head of a free Parliament, and in full

agreement with a great majority, made the true figure in the world that

such a monarch ought to do, and pursued the real interest of himself and

his kingdom. Will they allow her M[ajest]y to be in those circumstances

at present? And was it not plain by the addresses sent from all parts of

the island,[7] and by the visible disposition of the people, that such a

Parliament would undoubtedly be chosen? And so it proved, without the

court's using any arts to influence elections.

What people then, are these in a corner, to whom the constitution must

truckle? If the whole nation's credit cannot supply funds for the war,

without humble application from the entire legislature to a few retailers

of money, it is high time we should sue for a peace. What new maxims

are these, which neither we nor our forefathers ever heard of before, and

which no wise institution would ever allow? Must our laws from

henceforward pass the Bank and East India Company, or have their royal

assent before they are in force?

To hear some of those worthy reasoners talking of credit, that she is so

nice, so squeamish, so capricious; you would think they were describing a

lady troubled with vapours or the colick, to be only removed by a course

of steel, and swallowing a bullet. By the narrowness of their thoughts,

one would imagine they conceived the world to be no wider than Exchange

Alley. It is probable they may have such a sickly dame among them, and it

is well if she has no worse diseases, considering what hands she passes

through. But the national credit is of another complexion; of sound

health, and an even temper, her life and existence being a quintessence

drawn from the vitals of the whole kingdom. And we find these

money-politicians, after all their noise, to be of the same opinion, by

the court they paid her, when she lately appeared to them in the form of a

_lottery_.[8]

As to that mighty error in politics, they charge upon the Qu[een], for

changing her ministry in the height of a war, I suppose, it is only

looked upon as an error under a Whiggish administration; otherwise, the

late King has much to answer for, who did it pretty frequently. And it

is well known, that the late ministry of famous memory, was brought in

during this present war,[9] only with this circumstance, that two or

three of the chief, did first change their own principles, and then took

in suitable companions.

But however, I see no reason why the Tories should not value their wisdom

by events, as well as the Whigs. Nothing was ever thought a more

precipitate rash counsel, than that of altering the coin at the juncture

it was done;[10] yet the prudence of the undertaking was sufficiently

justified by the success. Perhaps it will be said, that the attempt was

necessary, because the whole species of money, was so grievously clipped

and counterfeit. And, is not her Majesty's authority as sacred as her

coin? And has not that been most scandalously clipped and mangled, and

often counterfeited too?

It is another grievous complaint of the Whigs, that their late friends,

and the whole party, are treated with abundance of severity in print, and

in particular by the "Examiner." They think it hard, that when they are

wholly deprived of power, hated by the people, and out of all hope of

re-establishing themselves, their infirmities should be so often

displayed, in order to render them yet more odious to mankind. This is

what they employ their writers to set forth in their papers of the week;

and it is humoursome enough to observe one page taken up in railing at the

"Examiner" for his invectives against a discarded ministry; and the other

side filled with the falsest and vilest abuses, against those who are now

in the highest power and credit with their sovereign, and whose least

breath would scatter them into silence and obscurity. However, though I

have indeed often wondered to see so much licentiousness taken and

connived at, and am sure it would not be suffered in any other country of

Christendom; yet I never once invoked the assistance of the gaol or the

pillory, which upon the least provocation, was the usual style during

their tyranny. There hath not passed a week these twenty years without

some malicious paper, scattered in every coffee-house by the emissaries

of that party, whether it were down or up. I believe, they will not

pretend to object the same thing to us. Nor do I remember any constant

weekly paper, with reflections on the late ministry or j[u]nto. They have

many weak, defenceless parts, they have not been used to a regular

attack, and therefore it is that they are so ill able to endure one, when

it comes to be their turn. So that they complain more of a few months'

truths from us, than we did of all their scandal and malice, for twice as

many years.

I cannot forbear observing upon this occasion, that those worthy authors

I am speaking of, seem to me, not fairly to represent the sentiments of

their party; who in disputing with us, do generally give up several of

the late m[inist]ry, and freely own many of their failings. They confess

the monstrous debt upon the navy, to have been caused by most scandalous

mismanagement; they allow the insolence of some, and the avarice of

others, to have been insupportable: but these gentlemen are most liberal

in their praises to those persons, and upon those very articles, where

their wisest friends give up the point. They gravely tell us, that such a

one was the most faithful servant that ever any prince had; another the

most dutiful, a third the most generous, and a fourth of the greatest

integrity. So that I look upon these champions, rather as retained by a

cabal than a party, which I desire the reasonable men among them would

please to consider.

[Footnote 1: No. 37 in the reprint. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 2: Cicero, "Ep. ad Att.," ix. 5. "I am always more affected by

the causes of events than by the events themselves."--E.S. SHUCKBURGH.

[T.S.]]

[Footnote 3: "I am resolved ... to maintain the indulgence by law

allowed to scrupulous consciences" (Queen Anne's Speech, November 27th,

1710). [T.S.]]

[Footnote 4: The Queen appointed Earl Rivers to the lieutenancy of the

Tower without the Duke of Marlborough's concurrence. See "Memoirs

Relating to that Change," etc. (vol. v., pp. 375-7 of present edition).

[T.S.]]

[Footnote 5: "Upon the fall of that great minister and favourite

[Godolphin], that whole party became dispirited, and seemed to expect the

worst that could follow". (Swift's "Memoirs Relating to that Change,"

etc., vol v., p. 378 of present edition). [T.S.]]

[Footnote 6: The Duchess of Marlborough. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 7: "The bulk of the high-church, or Tory-party ... were both

very industrious in procuring addresses, which, under the pretence of

expressing their loyalty to the Queen, and affection to the Church

established, were mainly levelled, like so many batteries, against the

ministry and Parliament," etc. (Boyer's "Annals of Queen Anne," ix.

158-9). [T.S.]]

[Footnote 8: An Act for reviving ... certain Duties (9 Ann., c. 6),

provided that £1,500,000 should be raised "by way of a lottery." It was

introduced February 15th, and received the Royal Assent March 6th, 1710/1

[T.S.]]

[Footnote 9: The Queen appointed a ministry with Lord Godolphin as

lord treasurer in the first months of her reign, May-July, 1702. [T.S.]]

[Footnote 10: The clipping of coin had become so widespread that it was

absolutely imperative that steps should be taken to readjust matters. It

was resolved, therefore, in 1695, to call in all light money and recoin

it. The matter was placed in charge of the then chancellor of the

exchequer, Charles Montague, afterwards Earl of Halifax, and he,

with the assistance of Sir Isaac Newton, successfully accomplished the

very arduous task. It cost the nation about £2,200,000, and a

considerable inconvenience owing to lack of coins. [T.S.]]

The Prose Works of Jonathan Swift, D.D. — Volume 09 Contributions to The Tatler, The Examiner, The Spectator, and The Intelligencer · 第 103 / 133 题