I have sometimes thought that Shakspeare may have written:--

"As flaws cong_est_ed in the spring of day."

It is an easy thing to have printed cong_eal_ed for that word, and

_congest_ occurs in _A Lover's Complaint_. Still I think change

unnecessary.

Has the assertion made in _An Answer to Mr. Pope's Preface to

Shakspeare_, by a Strolling Player, 1729, respecting the destruction of

the poet's MSS. papers, been ever verified? If that account is

authentic, it will explain the singular dearth of all autograph remains

of one who must have written so much. As the pamphlet is not common, I

transcribe the essential passage:--

"How much it is to be lamented that _Two large Chests_ full of

this GREAT MAN'S _loose papers_ and _Manuscripts_ in the hands

of an ignorant _Baker of_ WARWICK (who married one of the

descendants from Shakspear), were carelessly scattered and

thrown about as Garret Lumber and Litter, to {54} the particular

knowledge of the late _Sir William Bishop_; till they were all

consum'd in the general Fire and Destruction of that Town."

Notes and Queries, Number 04, November 24, 1849 · 第 22 / 82 题