REPORT OF JOHN MASON, JR.

In further testimony concerning the situation of affairs in the

Cherokee Nation at this period, may be cited the report of John Mason,

Jr., who was in the summer of 1837[430] sent as the confidential

agent of the War Department to make observations and report. In the

autumn[431] of that year he reported that--

The chiefs and better informed part of the nation are convinced

that they cannot retain the country. But the opposition to the

treaty is unanimous and irreconcilable. They say it cannot bind

them because they did not make it; that it was made by a few

unauthorized individuals; that the nation is not a party to it. *

* * They retain the forms of their government in their proceedings

among themselves, though they have had no election since 1830; the

chiefs and headmen then in power having been authorized to act

until their government shall again be regularly constituted. Under

this arrangement John Ross retains the post of principal chief. *

* * The influence of this chief is unbounded and unquestioned. The

whole nation of eighteen thousand persons is with him, the few,

about three hundred, who made the treaty having left the country.

It is evident, therefore, that Ross and his party are in fact the

Cherokee Nation. * * * Many who were opposed to the treaty have

emigrated to secure the rations, or because of fear of an outbreak.

* * * The officers say that, with all his power, Ross cannot, if

he would, change the course he has heretofore pursued and to which

he is held by the fixed determination of his people. He dislikes

being seen in conversation with white men, and particularly with

agents of the Government. Were he, as matters now stand, to advise

the Indians to acknowledge the treaty, he would at once forfeit

their confidence and probably his life. Yet though unwavering in

his opposition to the treaty, Ross's influence has constantly been

exerted to preserve the peace of the country, and Colonel Lindsay

says that he (Ross) alone stands at this time between the whites

and bloodshed. The opposition to the treaty on the part of the

Indians is unanimous and sincere, and it is not a mere political

game played by Ross for the maintenance of his ascendancy in the

tribe.

The Cherokee Nation of Indians. (1887 N 05 / 1883-1884 (pages 121-378)) · 第 154 / 266 题