CHEROKEE AFFAIRS WEST OF THE MISSISSIPPI.

Whilst all these events having a bearing upon the condition and

prospective welfare of that portion of the Cherokee people who had

remained in their old homes east of the Mississippi River were

happening, those who had taken up their abode in the Arkansas country

were likewise having their troubles.

_Difficulties with the Osages._--Their disagreements with the Osages,

which had, with slight intermission, existed for years, broke out

afresh when in February, 1820, a party of Osages robbed and killed

three Cherokees. The latter determined upon the prosecution of a

general war against the aggressors, and were only persuaded to pause

at the earnest solicitation[306] of Governor Miller, of Arkansas

Territory, until he could visit the villages of the Osages and demand

the surrender of the murderers. In company with four of the Cherokee

chiefs, he proceeded to the principal Osage village, where they were

kindly received by the Osages, who repudiated the action of the

murderers and agreed conditionally to surrender them. They, however,

produced the treaty concluded in 1818, under the superintendence

of Governor Clark, between themselves and the Cherokees, Shawnees,

and Delawares, wherein it was agreed that a permanent peace should

thenceforth exist between them, and that the Cherokees were to meet

them at Fort Smith the following spring and surrender all Osage

prisoners, which the former had neglected to do and still retained a

number of Osage captives. The Cherokee chiefs admitted that this was

true, whereupon Governor Miller advised them that before the Osage

murderers could be surrendered, the Cherokees must comply with their

agreement by surrendering all prisoners in their hands. An arrangement

was made to meet at Fort Smith in October following and effect the

exchange,[307] which was done. Notwithstanding this adjustment, the

feeling of hostility between the two tribes remained. Active warfare

broke out again in the summer of 1821,[308] and was not suppressed by

the most strenuous efforts of the United States authorities until the

fall of the following year.[309]

_Boundaries and area._--Governor Miller reported, in connection with

this subject, that the Arkansas Cherokees were very restless and

dissatisfied. They complained much in that, as they said, no part of

the treaty of 1819 had been complied with by the United States and in

that they had received no annuity money since their removal to the west

of the Mississippi River. Furthermore, their boundaries had not been

established, and they still awaited the fulfillment of the promise made

them for an extension of their line to the west as far as the Osage

line. To this latter scheme the Osages were much opposed, preferring

rather to have the country occupied by whites. The adjustment of this

boundary question would seem to have been very desirable, inasmuch as

nearly one-half of the Cherokees had taken up their abode south of

the Arkansas River,[310] which was clearly outside of their proper

limits. It formed the subject of much correspondence and complaint

throughout several years, and was the occasion of a number of visits of

representative delegations from the Arkansas Cherokees to Washington.

The eastern boundary had, as already stated, been run by General Rector

in 1818-'19, but the difficulty in fixing the western line arose

from the fact that the quantity of land to which the Cherokees were

entitled was to be measured by the area already ceded by them to the

United States by the treaties of 1817 and 1819. The ascertainment of

this latter quantity with exactness could not be made in advance of

the completion of the surveys thereof by the States of North Carolina,

Tennessee, and Georgia. From such reports and estimates as the United

States were able to secure from the several State authorities, it

was estimated, early in 1823,[311] that the quantity to which the

Cherokees were entitled was about 3,285,710 acres, and they were

informed that measures would at once be taken to have the western

boundary established. This was performed under direction of Governor

Miller, in compliance with instructions given him for that purpose on

the 4th of March, 1823. A year later[312] a delegation of the Indians

visited Washington to complain that the boundary had been run without

notice to them and in such a manner as to be highly prejudicial to

their interests. It was also urged that the quantity of land included

was largely less than the quantity ceded by the Cherokees east of the

Mississippi.

It would seem that in the survey of this western boundary Governor

Miller, through a misconception of his instructions, had caused the

line to be run due north, and south, instead of in a direction parallel

with that of the east line, as was the evident intention of the treaty

of 1817.[313] The effect of this action was to largely curtail the

Cherokee frontage on Arkansas River, where the lands were rich and

capable of remunerative cultivation, and to extend their frontier on

the Upper White River, toward the rough and comparatively valueless

region of the Ozark Mountains. It was also admitted by the Secretary of

War that the quantity of land within these boundaries was probably less

than that to which the Cherokees were entitled.[314] Inquiries were

accordingly again made of the several State authorities as to the area

of territory acquired by them through the treaties of 1817 and 1819,

the replies to which, though partially estimated, aggregated 4,282,216

acres.[315] Directions were therefore given to Agent Duval[316] to

propose to the Indians the running of a provisional line, subject to

such future alterations as the official returns of the quantity ceded

in the States should render necessary and proper. It seems, however,

from a report of Agent Duval, that the Cherokees in council had

expressed to him a preference to adopt for their western boundary what

was known as the "upper" or Governor Miller line, and to run thence

down and between the Arkansas and White Rivers for quantity, ignoring

the line run under the treaty of 1817 by General Rector, the effect

of which would be to give them an extension of territory to the east

instead of toward the west. This proposition called forth directions

from the Secretary of War to Governor Izard, in the spring of 1825, to

open negotiations with the Cherokees upon the subject of an exchange

of territory with them for an equal quantity of land lying to the west

of Arkansas and Missouri, and for their removal thereto, but that the

matter must not be pressed to the point of irritation. If, through the

aversion of the Indians to entertain such a proposition, it should be

dropped, then, if ±he same should be satisfactory to the citizens of

Arkansas, the proposal contained in the report of Agent Duval would

meet the views of the Government.[317]

The Indians were brought to no definite agreement to either of these

propositions. In the meantime their provisional western boundary was

established and run, in January and February, 1825.[318] The line began

at the upper end of Table Rock Bluff, on the Arkansas River, and ran

north 1 mile and 70 chains, crossing Skin Bayou at a distance of 66

chains from the beginning; thence it ran north 53° east 132 miles and

31 chains, to White River, which it struck at a point opposite the

mouth of Little North Fork.

As a matter of fact, so strong was the prejudice of the Cherokees

against any concession of territory that their council passed[319] what

they denominated a "perpetual law" denouncing the death penalty against

any of their nation who should propose the sale or exchange of their

lands.

_Lovely's purchase._--In the mean time the legislature of Arkansas,

through Acting Governor Crittenden, had forwarded to the President

in the summer of 1824, a memorial urging that the tract of country

known as "Lovely's purchase" be thrown open to white settlement by a

revocation of the prohibitory order of December 15, 1818. This the

President declined to do until a final adjustment should be made of the

west boundary of the Cherokees and the east boundary of the Choctaws.

A history of "Lovely's purchase" is to be found in a letter dated

January 30, 1818, from Major Long, of the Topographical Engineers,

to General Thomas A. Smith. From this it seems that by a treaty then

recently made (but without any authority) with the Osages, "by Mr.

Lovely, late Indian agent,"[320] that tribe had ceded to the United

States the country between the Arkansas and Red Rivers, and also a

tract on the north of the Arkansas situated between the Verdigris River

and the boundary established by the Osage treaty of 1808. It appears,

however, that it was not the intention of the Osages to cede to the

United States so large a tract on the north of the Arkansas, but, as

afterwards alleged by their chiefs, they only desired to surrender

the country lying south of a line commencing at the Falls of the

Verdigris and running due east to the treaty line of 1808, and east of

another line beginning at the same place and running due south as far

as their possessions should extend, and thence east again to the 1808

boundary, excepting and reserving therefrom the point of land between

the Verdigris and Six Bulls or Grand River. The Osages, never having

been informed that the treaty was not duly authorized and had not been

confirmed, still considered the country described therein as belonging

to the United States, and had repeatedly solicited whites to settle

on it, alleging that the main object of the cession on their part was

to secure the convenient approach of civilized neighbors, who should

instruct the men how to cultivate the ground and the women to spin and

weave, that they might be able to live when the forests should afford

no further supplies of game. They were therefore much irritated when

they found civilized settlements prohibited, in order to protect the

introduction and establishment adjoining or upon this territory of

their inveterate enemies, the Cherokees.

_Western outlet._--The indefinite outlet to the west which had been

promised the Cherokees by the President in 1818 formed the subject of

much complaint by them from time to time. In the spring of 1823[321]

they were advised that until their western boundary was established

it would be improper to make any decision upon the "outlet" question.

Two years earlier[322] it had been declared to them that in removing

settlers from "Lovely's Purchase," for the purpose of giving them their

western outlet, it must always be understood that they thereby acquired

no right to the soil, and that the Government reserved to itself the

right of making such disposition as it might think proper of all salt

springs therein. But this troublous question was definitively disposed

of when the treaty of 1828 came to be negotiated.

By the provisions of an act of Congress approved April 5, 1826,[323]

the land districts of the Territory of Arkansas were extended so as to

include all the country within the limits of that Territory as then

existing (the limits having been extended 40 miles to the west by act

of Congress of May 26, 1824),[324] with the proviso, however, that

nothing in the act should be so construed as to authorize any survey

or interference whatever upon any lands the right whereof resided

in any Indian tribes. Notwithstanding this proviso, reports became

current that surveys had been begun of "Lovely's Purchase," causing

much irritation and ill feeling among the Cherokees and eliciting an

order[325] from the Secretary of War forbidding any further surveys

until it should be finally ascertained how much land the Cherokees

were entitled to receive from the United States in pursuance of the

treaties of 1817 and 1819.

_Negotiation and conclusion of treaty of 1828._--Matters remained thus

_in statu quo_ until the spring of 1828, when a delegation of the

Western Cherokees arrived in Washington, clothed with authority to

present to the attention of the President their numerous grievances and

to adjust all matters in dispute for their people. The burden of their

complaints had relation to the delays that had occurred in fixing their

boundaries; to the failure to secure to them the promised "western

outlet;" to the adjustment of the hostilities that continued to exist

between themselves and the Osages; and to the irregularity in the

receipt of their annuities, as well as to the encroachments of white

settlers.[326]

The delegation were not clothed with authority to negotiate for

any cession or exchange of territory, the "perpetual law" against

entertaining such a proposition being still in force among them.

Notwithstanding this fact, a communication was addressed to them

from the War Department[327] desiring to be advised if they had any

objection to opening negotiations upon a basis of an exchange of land

for territory west of the west boundary of Arkansas, provided that

boundary should be removed a distance of 40 miles to the east, so as to

run from Fort Smith to the southwest corner of the State of Missouri,

and also that the Creeks should be removed from their location above

the Falls of Verdigris River to territory within the forks of the

Canadian and Arkansas Rivers. To this proposal the delegation returned

a polite but determined refusal, and demanded that the actual number of

acres to which they were entitled in Arkansas be ascertained and laid

off with exact definiteness. The whole subject of an exchange of lands

was thereupon submitted by the Secretary of War to the President for

his direction, and it was announced[328] to the visiting delegation

that the President had concluded to order a permanent western line

to be run, within which should be embraced the full quantity of land

to which they were entitled, and which was found to be, as nearly as

possible, as follows:[329]

The Cherokee Nation of Indians. (1887 N 05 / 1883-1884 (pages 121-378)) · 第 120 / 266 题