F. HARSHNESS OF THE GOVERNMENT (1716).

+Source.+--_Culloden Papers: comprising an Extensive and Interesting

Correspondence from the Year 1625 to 1678 ... the Whole published

from the Originals in the Possession of Duncan George Forbes, of

Culloden, Esq._, p. 61. (London: 1815.)

No. LXXII.

An anonymous letter, written by Mr. Duncan Forbes to Sir Robert Walpole,

most likely in August 1716--a copy is extant (from which the present is

taken) in the President's handwriting.

Sir, ... When the late Rebellion was happily ended by the Pretender's

flight, his deluded followers found themselves all in chains, or obliged

to surrender and sue for mercy, or to fly their country with him. Every

man concerned in that odious work certainly deserved death, and the

punishment due by law; but humanity and prudence forbade it. It was not

fit to dispeople a country; nor prudent to grieve the King's best

friends, who mostly had some concern in those unfortunate men; or

expedient to give too just grounds of clamour to the disaffected.

It will be agreed on all hands, that the proper rule in this case would

have been, to have punished only as many as was necessary for terror,

and for weakening the strength of the rebels for the future; and to

extend mercy to as many as it could conveniently be indulged to with the

security of the Government; and this maxim every thinking Whig had then

in his mouth, however offended at the insolences of the rebels. In place

of a course of this kind, the method followed was, 1st, to try all the

criminals in England; 2dly, to detain in prison all those in custody in

Scotland, except some who had interest with certain great men to obtain

a previous pardon, to the manifest dishonour of the Government; 3dly, to

attaint a vast number of Scots noblemen and gentlemen; 4thly, to put it

out of his Majesty's power to grant any part of estates forfeited; and

5thly, to appoint a Commission for enquiry, and levying the rebels'

goods and chattels. The necessary consequences of this procedure in

general are two; first, it makes all those who had the misfortune to be

seduced into the rebellion, with their children, relatives, and such as

depend on them, forever desperate; and it's hard to tell what occasions

may offer for venting their rage. We see that want and hard

circumstances lead men daily into follies, without any other temptation;

but when those circumstances are brought on by adherence to any

principle, or opinion, it's certain the sufferers will not quit their

attempts to better their condition, but with their lives. 2d, as there

are none of the rebels who have not friends among the King's faithful

subjects, it is not easy to guess how far a severity of this kind,

unnecessarily pushed, may alienate the affections even of those from the

Government. But in particular, as this case relates to Scotland, the

difficulty will be insurmountable. I may venture to say, there are not

200 gentlemen in the whole kingdom who are not very nearly related to

some one or other of the rebels. Is it possible that a man can see his

daughter, his grandchildren, his nephews, or cousins, reduced to beggary

and starving unnecessarily by a Government, without thinking very ill of

it; and where this is the case of a whole nation, I tremble to think

what dissatisfactions it will produce against a settlement so necessary

for the happiness of Britain.

If all the rebels, with their wives, children, and immediate dependants,

could be at once rooted out of the earth, the shock would be

astonishing; but time would commit it to oblivion, and the danger would

be less to the Constitution, than when thousands of innocents, punished

with misery and want for the offences of their friends, are suffered to

wander about the country, sighing out their complaints to Heaven, and

drawing at once the compassion and moving the indignation of every human

creature.

The Jacobite Rebellions (1689-1746) (Bell's Scottish History Source Books.) · 第 61 / 160 题