When we know how extensive the action of water carrying mud and gravel

is on every shore and in every water-current,--when we can trace this

action almost everywhere, and nowhere find it similar to the phenomena

just described, I cannot imagine upon what ground these phenomena are

still attributed to the agency of currents. This is the less rational

as we have at present, in all high mountain chains of the temperate

zone, other agents, the glaciers, producing these very same phenomena,

with precisely the same characters, to which therefore a sound

philosophy should ascribe, at least conditionally, the northern and

alpine polished surfaces, and scratched and grooved rocks, or at least

acknowledge that the effect produced by the action of glaciers more

nearly resembles these erratic phenomena than does that which results

from the action of currents. But such is the prejudice of many

geologists, that those keen faculties of distinction and

generalization, that power of superior perception and discrimination,

which have led them to make such brilliant discoveries in geology in

general, seem to abandon them at once as soon as they look at the

erratics. The objection made by a venerable geologist, that the cold

required to form and preserve such glaciers, for any length of time,

would freeze him to death, is as childish as the apprehension that the

heavy ocean-currents, the action of which he sees everywhere, might

have swept him away.[47]

Footnote 47: Berlin Academy, 1846.

Now that these phenomena have been observed extensively, we may derive

also some instruction from the limits of their geographical extent.

Let us see, therefore, where these polished, scratched, and furrowed

rocks have been observed.

In the first place they occur everywhere in the north within certain

limits of the arctics, and through the colder parts of the temperate

zone. They occur also in the southern hemisphere, within parallel

limits, but in the plains of the tropics, and even in the warmer parts

of the temperate zone we find no trace of these phenomena, and

nevertheless the action of currents could not be less there, and could

not at any time have been less there than in the colder climates. It

is true, similar phenomena occur in Central Europe, and have been

noticed in Central Asia, and even in the Andes of South America, but

these always in higher regions, at definite levels above the surface

of the sea, everywhere indicating a connection between their extent

and the colder temperature of the places over which they are traced.

More recently, a step towards the views I entertain of this subject

has been made by those geologists who would ascribe them to the agency

of icebergs. Here, as in my glacial theory, ice is made the agent;

floating ice is supposed to have ground and polished the surfaces of

rocks, while I consider them to have been acted upon by terrestrial

glaciers. To settle this difference we have a test which is as

irresistible as the other arguments already introduced.

Let us investigate the mode of action, the mode of transportation of

icebergs, and let us examine whether this cause is adequate to produce

phenomena for which it is made to account. As mentioned above, the

polished surfaces are continuous over hills, and in depressions of the

soil, and the scratches which run over such undulating surfaces are

nevertheless continuous in straight lines. If we imagine icebergs

moving upon shoals, no doubt they would scratch and polish the rocks

in a way similar to moving glaciers. But upon such grounds they would

sooner or later be stranded; and if they remained loose enough to

move, they would, in their gyratory movements, produce curved lines,

and mark the spots where they had been stranded with particular

indications of their prolonged action. But nowhere upon arctic ground

do we find such indications. Everywhere the polished and scratched

surfaces are continuous in straight juxtaposition.

Phenomena analogous to those produced by icebergs would only be seen

along the sea-shores; and if the theory of drifted icebergs were

correct, we should have, all over those continents where erratic

phenomena occur, indications of retreating shores as far as the

erratic phenomena are found. But there is no such thing to be observed

over the whole extent of the North American continent, nor over

Northern Europe and Asia, as far as the northern erratics extend. From

the arctics to the southernmost limit of the erratic distribution, we

find nowhere the indications of the action of the sea as directly

connected with the production of the erratic phenomena. And wherever

the marine deposits rest upon the polished surfaces of ground and

scratched rocks, they can be shewn to be deposits formed since the

grooving and polishing of the rocks, in consequence of the subsidence

of those tracts of land upon which such deposits occur.

Again, if we take for a moment into consideration the immense extent

of land covered by erratic phenomena, and view them as produced by

drifted icebergs, we must acknowledge that the icebergs of the

_present period_ at least, are insufficient to account for them, as

they are limited to a narrower zone. And to bring icebergs in any way

within the extent which would answer for the extent of the

distribution of erratics, we must assume that the northern ice-fields,

from which these icebergs could be detached and float southwards, were

much larger at the time they produced such extensive phenomena than

they are now. That is to say, we must assume an ice period; and if we

look into the circumstances, we shall find that this ice period, to

answer to the phenomena, should be nothing less than an extensive cap

of ice upon both poles. This is the very theory which I advocate; and

unless the advocates of an iceberg-theory go to that length in their

premises, I venture to say, without fear of contradiction, that they

will find the source of their icebergs fall short of the requisite

conditions which they must assume, upon due consideration, to account

for the whole phenomena as they have really been observed.

But without discussing any farther the theoretical views of the

question, let me describe more minutely the facts, as observed on the

northern shores of Lake Superior. The polished surfaces, as such, are

even, undulating, and terminate always above the rough lee-side turned

to the south, unless upon gentle declivities, where the polished

surfaces extend in unbroken continuity upon the southern surfaces of

the hills, as well as upon their northern slopes. On their eastern and

western flanks, shallow valleys running east and west are as uniformly

polished as those which run north and south; and this fact is more and

more evident, wherever scratches and furrows are also well preserved

and distinctly seen, and by their bearings we can ascertain most

minutely, the direction of the onward movement which produced the

whole phenomena. Nothing is more striking in this respect than the

valleys or depressions of the soil running east and west, where we see

the scratches crossing such undulations at right angles, descending

along the southern gentle slope of a hill, traversing the flat bottom

below, and rising again up the next hill south, in unbroken

continuity. Examples of the kind can be seen everywhere in those

narrow inlets, with shallow waters intersecting the innumerable

highlands along the northern shores of Lake Superior, where the

scratches and furrows can be traced under water from one shore to the

other, and where they at times ascend steep hills, which they cross at

right angles along their northern slope, even when the southern slope,

not steeper in itself, faces the south with rough escarpments.

The scratches and furrows, though generally running north and south,

and deviating slightly to the east and west, present, in various

places, remarkable anomalies, even in their general course along the

eastern shore of the lake. Between Michipicotin and Sault St Marie, we

more frequently see a deflection to the west than a due north and

south course, which is rather normal along the northern shore proper,

between Michipicotin and other islands, and from the Pic to

Fort-William; the deep depression of the lake being no doubt the cause

of such a deviation, as large masses of ice could accumulate in this

extensive hollow cavity before spreading again more uniformly beyond

its limits. To the oscillations of the whole mass in its southerly

movement, according to the inequalities of the surfaces, we must

ascribe the crossing of the straight lines at acute angles, as we

observe also at the present day under the glaciers, as they swell and

subside, and hence meet with higher and lower obstacles in their

irregular course between the Alpine valleys.

In deep, narrow chasms, however, we find now and then greater

deviations from the normal direction of the striæ, where considerable

masses of ice could accumulate, and move between steep walls under a

lateral pressure of the masses moving onwards from the north. Such a

chasm is seen between Spar Island and the main land opposite Prince's

Location, south of Fort-William, where the furrows and scratches run

nearly east and west. But here also, there is no tumultuous

disturbance in the continuation of the phenomena, such as would occur

if icebergs were floated and stranded against the southern barrier.

The same continuity of even, polished surfaces, with their scratches

and furrows, prevails here as elsewhere. The angles which these

scratches form with each other are very acute, generally not exceeding

10°; but at times they diverge more, forming angles of 15°, 20°, and

25°. In a few instances, I have even found localities where they

crossed each other at angles of no less than 30°; but these are rare

exceptions. It may sometimes be noticed that the lines running in one

direction form a system by themselves, varying very little from strict

parallelism with each other, but crossing another system, more or less

strongly marked, of other lines equally parallel with each other. At

other times, a system of lines, strongly marked and diverging very

slightly, seem to pass over another system, in which the lines form

various angles with each other. Again, there are places,--and this is

the most common case, where the lines diverge slightly, following,

however, generally one main direction, which is crossed by fewer

lines, forming more open angles. These differences, no doubt, indicate

various oscillations in the movement of the mass which produced the

lines, and shew probably its successive action, with more or less

intensity, upon the same point at successive periods, in accordance

with the direction of the moving force at each interval. The same

variations within precisely the same limits may be noticed in our day

on the margin of the glaciers produced by the increase or diminution

of the bulk of their mass, and the changes on the rate of their

movement.

The loose materials which produced, in their onward movement under the

pressure of ice, such polishing and grooving, consisted of

various-sized boulders, pebbles, and gravels, down to the most minute

sand and loamy powder. Accumulations of such materials are found

everywhere upon these smooth surfaces, and in their arrangement they

present everywhere the most striking contrast when compared with

deposits accumulated under the agency of water. Indeed, we nowhere

find this glacial drift regularly stratified, being every where

irregular accumulations of loose materials, scattered at random

without selection, the coarsest and most minute particles being piled

irregularly in larger or smaller heaps, the greatest boulders standing

sometimes uppermost, or in the centre, or in any position among

smaller pebbles and impalpable powder.

And these materials themselves are scratched, polished and furrowed,

and the scratches and furrows are rectilinear as upon the rocks _in

situ_ underneath, not bruised simply, as the loose materials carried

onward by currents or driven against the shores by the tides, but

regularly scratched, as fragments of hard materials would be if they

had been fastened during their friction against each other, just as we

observe them upon the lower surface of glaciers where all the loose

materials are set in ice, as stones in their setting are pressed and

rubbed against underlying rocks. But the setting here being simply

ice, these loose materials, fast at one time and moveable another, and

fixed and loosened again, have rubbed against the rock below in all

possible positions; and hence, not only their rounded form, but also

their rectilinear grooving. How such grooves could be produced under

the action of currents, I leave to the advocates of such a theory to

shew; as soon as they shall be prepared for it.

I should not omit here to mention a fact which, in my opinion, has a

great theoretical importance, namely, that in the northern erratics,

even the largest boulders, as far as I know, are rounded, and

scratched and polished; at least, all those which are found beyond the

immediate vicinity of the higher mountain ranges, shewing that the

accumulations of ice which moved the northern erratics covered the

whole country; and this view is sustained by another set of facts

equally important, namely, that the highest ridges, the highest rugged

mountains, at least, in this continent and north of the Alps in

Europe, are as completely polished and smoothed as the lower lands,

and only a very few peaks seem to have risen above the sheet of ice;

whilst, in the Alps, the summits of the mountains stand generally

above these accumulations of ice, and have supplied the surface of the

glaciers with large numbers of angular boulders, which have been

carried upon the back of glaciers to the lower valleys and adjacent

plains without losing their angular forms.

With respect to the irregular accumulation of drift-materials in the

north, I may add, that there is not only no indication of

stratification among them, such, unquestionably, as water would have

left, but that the very nature of these materials shews plainly that

they are of terrestrial origin; for the mud which sticks between them

adheres to all the little roughnesses of the pebbles, fills them out,

and has the peculiar adhesive character of the mud ground under the

glaciers, and differing entirely in that respect from the gravels, and

pebbles, and sands washed by water-currents, which leave each pebble

clean, and never form adhering masses, unless penetrated by an

infiltration of limestone.

Another important fact respecting this glacial draft consists in the

universal absence of marine, as well as fresh-water fossils in its

interior--a fact which strengthens the view that they have been

accumulated by the agency of strictly terrestrial glaciers; such is,

at least, the case everywhere far from the sea-shore. But we may

conclude that these ancient glaciers reached, upon various points, the

sea-shore at the time of their greatest extension, just as they do at

present in Spitzbergen and other arctic shores; and that therefore, in

such proximity, phenomena of contact should be observed, indicating

the onward movement of glacial material into the ocean, such as the

accumulation within these materials of marine fossil remains, and also

the influence of the tidal movements upon them. And now such is really

the case. Nearer the sea-shores we observe distinctly, in some

accumulations of the drift, faint indications of the action of the

tide, reaching the lower surface of glaciers, and the remodelling to

some extent of the materials which these poured into the sea. A

beautiful example of the kind may be observed near Cambridge, along

Charles River, not far from Mount Auburn, where the unstratified

glacial drift (_a_) presents in its upper masses strictly the

characters of true terrestrial glacial accumulation, but shews

underneath faint indications (_b_) of the action of tides. Above,

regular tidal strata (_c_) are observed, formed probably after the

masses below had subsided. The surface of this accumulation is covered

with soil (_d_).

[Illustration: Sketch of river bank stratification]

The period at which these phenomena took place cannot be fully

determined, nor is it easy to ascertain whether all glacial drift is

contemporaneous. It would seem, however, as if the extensive

accumulation of drift all around the northern pole in Europe, Asia,

and America was of the same age as the erratic of the Alps. The

climatic circumstances capable of accumulating such large masses of

ice around the north pole, having no doubt extended their influence

over the temperate zone, and probably produced, in high mountain

chains, as the Alps, the Pyrenees, the Black Forest, and the Vosges,

such accumulations of snow and ice as may have produced the erratic

phenomena of those districts. But extensive changes must have taken

place in the appearance of the continents over which we trace erratic

phenomena, since we observe in the Old World, as well as in North

America, extensive stratified deposits containing fossils which rest

upon the erratics; and as we have all possible good reasons and

satisfactory evidence for admitting that the erratics were transported

by the agency of terrestrial glaciers, and that, therefore, the tracts

of land over which they occur stood at that time above the level of

the sea, we are led to the conclusion that these continents have

subsided since that period below the level of the sea, and that over

their inundated portions, animal life has spread, remains of organized

beings have been accumulated, which are now found in a fossil state in

the deposits formed under those sheets of water.

Such deposits occur at various levels in different parts of North

America. They have been noticed about Montreal, on the shores of Lake

Champlain, in Maine, and also in Sweden and Russia; and what is most

important, they are not everywhere at the same absolute level above

the surface of the ocean, shewing that both the subsidence and the

subsequent upheaval which has again brought them above the level of

the sea, have been unequal; and that we should therefore be very

cautious in our inferences respecting both the continental

circumstances under which the ancient glaciers were formed, and also

the extent of the sea afterward, as compared with its present limits.

The contrast between the unstratified drift and the subsequently

stratified deposits is so great, that they rest everywhere

unconformably upon each other, shewing distinctly the difference of

the agency under which they were accumulated. This unconformable

superposition of marine drift upon glacial drift is so beautifully

shewn at the above-mentioned locality near Cambridge (see diagram, p.

114.) In this case the action of tides in the accumulation of the

stratified materials is plainly seen.

The various heights at which these stratified deposits occur, above

the level of the sea, shew plainly, that since their accumulation the

main land has been lifted above the ocean at different rates in

different parts of the country; and it would be a most important

investigation to have their absolute level, in order more fully to

ascertain the last changes which our continents have undergone.

From the above mentioned facts, it must be at once obvious that the

various kinds of loose materials all over the northern hemisphere,

have been accumulated, not only under different circumstances, but

during long-continued subsequent distinct periods, and that great

changes have taken place since their deposition, before the present

state of things was fully established.

To the first period,--the ice period, as I have called it,--belong all

the phenomena connected with the transportation of erratic boulders,

the polishing, scratching, and furrowing of the rocks, and the

accumulation of unstratified, scratched, and loamy drift. During that

period the mainland seems to have been, to some extent at least,

higher above the level of the sea than now; as we observe, on the

shores of Great Britain, Norway, and Sweden, as well as on the eastern

shores of North America, the polished surfaces dipping under the level

of the ocean, which encroaches everywhere upon the erratics proper,

effaces the polished surfaces, and remodels the glacial drift. During

these periods, large terrestrial animals lived upon both continents,

the fossil remains of which are found in the drift of Siberia, as well

as of this continent. A fossil elephant, recently discovered in

Vermont, adds to the resemblance, already pointed out, between the

northern drift of Europe and that of North America; for fossils of

that genus are now known to occur upon the northern-most point of the

western extremity of North America, in New England, in Northern

Europe, as well as all over Siberia.

To the second period we would refer the stratified deposits resting

upon drift, which indicate, that during their deposition the northern

continent had again extensively subsided under the surface of the

ocean.

During this period, animals, identical with those which occur in the

northern seas, spread widely over parts of the globe which are now

again above the level of the ocean. But, as this last elevation seems

to have been gradual, and is even still going on in our day, there is

no possibility of tracing more precisely, at least for the present,

the limit between that epoch and the present state of things. Their

continuity seems almost demonstrated by the identity of fossil-shells

found in these stratified deposits, with those now living along the

present shores of the same continent, and by the fact, that changes in

the relative level between sea and mainland are still going on in our

day.

Indications of such relative changes between the level of the waters

and the land are also observed about Lake Superior. And here they

assume a very peculiar character, as the level of the lake itself, in

its relation to its shores, is extensively changed.[48]

Footnote 48: An interesting account of the natural terraces

around Lake Superior is given at p. 413-416 of "Lake Superior."

_Description of the Marine Telescope._

By JOHN ADIE, F.R.S.E., F.R.S.S.A. Communicated by the Author.

The instrument which has been popularly named the Water, or Marine

Telescope, from the power given by its use to see into the water,

consists of a tube of metal or wood, of a convenient length, to enable

a person looking over the gunnel of a boat to rest the head on the one

end, while the other is below the surface of the water; the upper end

is so formed, that the head may rest on it, both eyes seeing freely

into the tube. Into the lower end is fixed (water-tight) a plate of

glass, which, when used, is to be kept under the surface of the water.

[Illustration: sketch of marine telescope]

A very convenient size for the instrument represented in the above

figure, is to make the length AC, 3 feet, and the mouth A, where the

face is applied, of an irregular oval form, that both eyes may see

freely into the tube, with an indentation on one side, that the nose

may breathe freely, not throwing the moisture of the breath into the

tube. B is a round plate of glass, 8 inches diameter, over which is

the rim or edge C; this rim is best formed of lead, ¼ of an inch

thick, and 3 inches deep; the weight of the lead serves to sink the

tube a little into the water. Holes must be provided at the junction

of B to C, for the purpose of allowing the air to escape, and bring

the water into contact with the glass; on each side there is a handle

for holding the instrument. This size and form is very much that of

the instrument brought from Norway by John Mitchell, Esq., Belgian

Consul, of Mayville, with the improvement for excluding the breath,

and allowing the water to get into contact with the glass, which was

not provided for in that instrument.

The Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal, Vol. XLIX April-October 1850 · 第 11 / 20 段