The castle of Norham-upon-Tweed, “Old Norham,” the Queen of Border

fortresses, and the most important stronghold between Carlisle and

Berwick, was long the “Castle Dangerous” of that contested territory,

and the strongest place on the Marches. It is a lasting monument of

episcopal magnificence, founded, restored, and maintained by Flambard,

Pudsey, and Beke, three of the most powerful prelates who sat in the

chair of St. Cuthbert, and as an example of a great Norman keep is

not unworthy to be named with Bamborough itself. The natural strength

of the ground led to its early occupation for purposes of defence,

and the traditions of Norham are in keeping with its architectural

grandeur. Here the Roman legions paused in their progress northwards,

and threw up earthworks which may still be recognised, and which

were probably abandoned when, under the military occupation of the

country, a permanent road was laid out a few miles to the eastward,

near to the mouth of the river. An early settlement of the Saxon kings

of Deira seems to have been on the steep side of Yevering Bell, the

ancient Gebrium, a spur of the Cheviot range, about twelve miles south

of Norham, where there yet remain formidable earthworks, which Mr.

Raine regarded as traces of the residence of the celebrated Eadwine,

King of Deira (585–633), the disciple and friend of Paulinus, but who

derived his knowledge of Christianity and probably his taste for a hill

residence from Cadvan of Gwynedd, by whom he was educated. Hence, in

later times, his successors moved their seat to Millfield, a place near

to the Till, and scarcely nine miles from Norham. Probably it was from

here that the Saxon kings guarded the pass of the Tweed, then called

Ubbanford; and it may well be that their handiwork remains in the banks

and ditches, not to be confounded with the camp of the legions, but

incorporated with the later castle, and which much resemble in their

figure and strength other well-known residences of the ninth century.

Here, near this “Northern home” of the successors of St. Cuthbert,

Bishop Ecfrid of Lindisfarne founded the parish church dedicated to

that saint, towards the middle of the ninth century, and placed in it

the remains of Ceolwulph, king and saint. The two contiguous shires

of Norham and Island, probably given by Oswald of Northumberland to

Lindisfarne, are reputed the oldest possessions of the see of Durham,

and detached from the body of the bishopric, presented a bold and

strongly-fortified front of twelve miles, from Coldstream to Berwick,

to the Scottish invaders. Early in the twelfth century arose the

castle, of which the ruins are still so grand, and for the possession

of which English and Scottish kings contended for centuries with

varying success. The great Edward, “Malleus Scotorum,” made much use

of Norham in his wars, and here, both in the church and in the castle,

were assembled before him the competitors for the Scottish throne,

of whom he selected one rather on the score of his subserviency than

of his worthiness. It was also from Norham that Surrey and Dacre and

the warders of the middle march directed that formidable raid which,

following upon Flodden, carried fire and sword almost to the gates of

Edinburgh. But although the broad stream of Tweed still flows at the

base of the castle rock, and the scaurs and ravines that constituted

the strength of the position still remain unaltered upon its southern

frontier, all else is widely changed. The lofty, though ruined,

battlements, rising far above the tufted trees, still, indeed, remain

the landmark of the local shire, but they no longer look out over

wasted lands and ruined villages, harried alternately by Englishman and

Scot, “galling the gleaned land with hot assays.” In no part of Britain

are the fields more skilfully cultivated, the rickyards more richly

stored, the byres stocked with cattle of a higher breed, the farmhouses

indicative of greater ease, or the agricultural labourer better able

to care for his own interests. All shows plainly to the eye of the

experienced traveller what has been achieved by the sturdy northern

agriculturist, under the invigorating influence of an unfettered trade.

Norham occupies the hollow of a grand bend of the Tweed, which here

cuts “a huge half-moon, a monstrous cantle,” out of the English bank

to bestow it upon that of Scotland, in the form of a broad and fertile

meadow. The castle stands upon a rocky platform, the south-western

extremity of a cliff which forms the river bank for a considerable

distance. A deep ravine cuts off the higher ground to the north-east,

and is joined by a less marked depression, which, deepened by art,

sweeps round and forms the southern defence until it opens upon the

steep slope which descends to the river and forms the north and

north-western front of the castle. Beyond this ditch, which contained

the approach from the village of Norham, and more to the south, is a

broad and level platform, also defended by deep ravines, upon which may

be traced the remains of the Roman camp and the less regular banks and

ditches of some of the besiegers of the castle. Both in its choice and

in the manner of occupation of the position are shown much strategical

judgment and engineering skill. It is both locally strong and well

selected for the defence of St. Cuthbert’s and the Northumbrian

frontier from Scottish inroads, as well as for the cutting off such

invaders as, having advanced southwards, might be forced to retreat.

The description of Simeon of Durham is both concise and accurate.

Writing of Flambard, he says: “Condidit castellum in excelso præruptæ

rupis super Tuedam flumen, ut inde latronum incursus inhiberet et

Scottorum irruptiones. Ibi enim, utpote in confinio regni Anglorum et

Scottorum, creber predantibus ante patebat excursus, nullo ibidem, quo

hujusmodi impetus repellerentur, præsidio locato.”

The glories of Norham, indeed, have been honourably recorded in every

stage of its stirring existence. Its sieges, misfortunes, reparations,

and their particulars and cost, are entered in considerable fulness in

the sheriffs’ accounts and in those of the Palatine see, and, finally,

in its neglect and decay, it has been honoured with Scott for its poet

and Raine for its historian.

The plan of the castle is irregular, following the general outline

of the ground. Like Barnard Castle, its form is a sort of quadrant,

the north and east faces 143 yards and 108 yards long, being nearly

at right angles, and more or less straight, and the border to the

south-west a curve of 223 yards, connecting the two sides. Of the area

thus enclosed, the north-eastern portion is occupied by the upper or

inner ward, the plan of which is roughly square, 57 yards east and west

by 47 yards north and south, covering, therefore, within its walls

2,680 square yards. The north and east sides of this ward form part of

the common curtain of the whole. In front of the other two sides is a

broad and deep ditch, which extends from the eastern ravine to the

northern steep, and is contained wholly within the outer ward, the

available area of which is thus considerably reduced. The whole was

contained within a curtain wall which, where it belonged to the inner

ward, was high and strong, but where to the outer ward was unequal,

being high where it crossed the ends of the inner ditch and along

a part of the north front, but elsewhere either very low or of but

moderate thickness. Most of the care of the engineer was lavished upon

the inner ward.

[Illustration: NORHAM CASTLE.

Wyman & Sons, Gᵗ. Queen Sᵗ. London.]

The keep, the great, and, though a mere ruin, the best-preserved

feature of the fortress, is rectangular, and measures at its base about

64 feet north and south by 86 feet east and west, and is or has been

about 90 feet high. The walls range from 12 feet to 15 feet thick, and

appear to be 8 feet to 10 feet at the summit, which is inaccessible.

The east end is a part of the exterior line of defence, and ranges with

the curtain. The south face looks into the outer, the two other faces

into the inner, ward. The exterior faces have certain peculiarities.

The south-east angle is capped by two pilasters, 11 feet broad and of

slight projection, which, like the similar pilasters at Kenilworth,

rise from a rough, bold, sloping plinth, 12 feet high, continued all

along the east end. These pilasters have various sets-off reducing

them to 10 feet at the summit. They meet at and cover the angle,

which is solid. Near the centre of the east end is another somewhat

similar pilaster, only 10 feet broad, and beyond this the wall has been

pulled down to the first floor. The part left, forming the north-east

angle of the keep, had no pilaster, but is bonded into the northern

curtain, which is of its age. The southern curtain is not in the line

of the keep, but sprung from its south face about 25 feet west of the

south-east angle, where it is seen to have been 7 feet thick and of

the height of the first floor of the keep, or about 30 feet. This also

was of the age of the keep. The southern face of the keep, so far at

least as its outer face is concerned, is of two dates. In the centre,

but belonging to the eastern or older part, is a pilaster, 8 feet

broad, but without setts-off. Between this and the south-east angle,

above the curtain, and also without sett-off, is another pilaster, only

3 feet wide. A flat wall, without pilasters, but with two setts-off

near the summit, occupies the next 36 feet westward. The base seems

old, but the upper part is certainly later, into which the Decorated

windows are probably insertions. Near the west end, about 16 feet from

the angle, is a plain pilaster, 3 feet broad and 6 inches projection,

which ascends to the second floor level, and stops at the cill of a

small pointed doorway in the second floor; above this, in the two upper

storeys, are two similar but rather smaller doors. It is probable that

these opened from mural lobbies into garderobes of timber, projected

from the wall: at least, it is difficult to suggest any other reason

for doorways so placed.

The west face is all of one date; the doors and windows are of the

Decorated period, but the wall itself is Norman. The curtain of the

inner ward abuts upon the south-west angle, and is about 30 feet high

and very thick, with a mural closet high up within it, which may be the

garderobe, completed probably soon after 1431–2. There are two pointed

doors, both at the ground level; one leading into the south chamber

of the keep, the other, near the centre, into a well-stair, 10 feet

diameter, which ascends in the wall to the summit, and terminates in

a raised square turret, a marked feature in every view of the keep.

Six loops, one over the other, show the line of this staircase, and a

few feet from the top, and over the door, are four or five corbels,

which evidently supported some kind of _brétasche_ of timber to protect

the doorway below. Above are various windows, three of two lights,

trefoiled, square-headed, but Decorated, and others of one light, with

square labels. Towards the south end of this front, at the first-floor

level, is a large round-headed doorway, evidently the original main

door of the keep, the outer stair leading to which is removed. No doubt

this stair ascended from the north end, and the chamber in the curtain,

now inaccessible, was either an oratory or a garderobe, opening from

the vestibule before the door. This end, like the south, is tolerably

perfect.

The north front is almost all removed. About 15 feet from the west end

there remains one jamb of a door at the ground level. Beyond this,

about 26 feet is level with the ground. The remainder, about 45 feet,

remains to the level of the first floor, and is pierced by two loops

from the basement.

The interior of the keep shows it to have contained a basement and

four floors, the whole divided east and west, or longitudinally, from

bottom to top, by a party wall 5 feet thick, of which only the lower

part remains. The basement, at the ground level, is composed of a north

and south chamber, each 60 feet long, the northern 20 feet and the

southern 15 feet broad. The southern was divided by a cross-wall into

two chambers, both barrel-vaulted, the western rather the longer. The

eastern has a loop to the east, high up, set in a splayed, round-headed

recess; and in the north wall is a door leading into the north chamber.

In the south wall, here 12 feet thick, is a breach 8 feet wide, at the

ground level, which probably represents a loop. The western chamber has

a loop in the south wall, the recess of which runs into the barrel,

producing a groin. In the west end is a doorway and passage through the

wall, here 15 feet thick, and by its side a loop. There must have been

a door between these southern chambers, in the cross-wall.

The northern chamber seems to have been one room only, broken into four

compartments by groined vaulting, between each bay being a broad flat

band. There is a loop at the east end, and two others near it, in the

north wall. The two western bays are broken down. In the west wall is a

loop, and near it, in the north wall, the jamb of a door of entrance,

probably the stone doorway into the dungeon vault made in 1429–30,

and fitted with an iron gate. This basement vaulting is about 10 feet

high to the springing, and is original, as at Bamborough, Mitford, and

Newcastle, and the walls and loops all round, seen from within,

seem also original, and their interior face work is excellent open or

jointed ashlar. The remains of the cross-wall show the first floor

to have contained two chambers, both probably vaulted; the southern

certainly so. Each was entered by a door from the western staircase.

The north and much of the east wall of this north chamber is gone. In

the west end is a Decorated window in a large round-headed recess,

flat-sided, and near it the entrance from the staircase. In the east

end was a loop in a splayed recess. The southern chamber was probably a

lower and lesser hall. In its east end is a door from the well-stair,

and another door, large and round-headed, once the main entrance.

Against the south wall are seen the remains of the vault, of four

compartments, groined, the bays divided by cross arches springing from

corbels. In the most western bay was a fireplace; in each of the three

eastern a round-headed window in a splayed recess. In the east end is

a pointed recess and a large lancet window, the whole evidently an

insertion. The height of this floor was about 12 feet to the spring of

the vault.

[Illustration: NORHAM KEEP.

BASEMENT.

Wyman & Sons, Gᵗ. Queen Sᵗ. London.]

The second was the floor of state, and, in the original keep, also the

uppermost floor. The two rooms had low-pitched open roofs, of which the

weather mouldings are seen, as at Porchester, in the end walls. These

rooms were entered, each by its own door, from the well-stair, but the

northern door has been built up and a loop placed in it. Of the north

chamber there only remains a large window in the west wall, in a drop

arch, a Decorated insertion. If there was any fireplace, it must have

been in the dividing wall. The south chamber was evidently the great

hall. In its east end is a large full-centred Norman recess, containing

a Norman window. In the west wall, besides the staircase door, here

pointed below a square label, is a pointed recess and window. In the

south wall are two bold, round-headed recesses splayed to small lancet

windows, and west of these a pointed door, probably entering a mural

chamber, and communicating with the door already mentioned, in the

outer face of the wall.

Originally there was no third floor, and to provide this the hall roof

was removed, and for it substituted a flat ceiling supported by nine

joists, the holes for which remain. On these were laid the planks

of the third floor. Of this the north chamber had in its west end a

segmented arched window recess and the staircase door, now blocked up.

In the north chamber, west end, was a similar staircase door and a

pointed window recess. The east wall was not pierced, neither was the

south wall, save by one window, and near it a small pointed door, near

the west end. The covering of this storey was composed also of nine

joists, which carried the planks of the fourth floor.

Of this floor the remains are but slight. It also was composed of two

chambers. Of the north the west wall remains, but it contains neither

window nor staircase door. The south chamber has in its west end a

window, and in its south wall a fireplace. Of this wall only about 6

feet in height remains, so that probably about 4 feet to 6 feet of its

upper part is gone. Considering the thickness of the walls, the absence

of mural chambers and galleries in this keep is remarkable.

The keep was certainly built originally by Ralf Flambard in 1121, and

the eastern end and adjacent halves of the north and south sides were

certainly of the same date. It is also pretty certain that Flambard’s

keep was of the same size with the present one, and the whole basement,

and the vaulting of the first floor, seems original. Probably there

was but one entrance, that in the west end at the first-floor level,

and there would be, in that case, an exterior tower or fore-building,

covering the staircase, and of which there seem to be traces in the

face of the curtain against which, as at Kenilworth, it must have

abutted. The entrance is quite plain, and without a portcullis. Bishop

Pudsey, who ruled from 1158 to 1174, is said to have rebuilt the

western half of the ruined keep. Possibly he only restored it, for

it is scarcely probable that half of so very substantial a building

should have been pulled down, either with the means or in the time at

the disposal of any band of invaders; still, it must be admitted, that

the western half differs materially from the eastern. In the latter,

the plinth is bold and high, and the pilasters marked features. In the

western part are no pilasters, and no plinth of any consequence, and

the setts-off of the wall are at a different height. If Bishop Pudsey

rebuilt the western half, he did so in the late Norman style, so that

the work harmonises inside with that of Flambard. Pudsey, no doubt,

raised the walls somewhat, converted the ridge roofs of the second

story into a flat covering, and, in the space thus gained and created,

added two more floors, as was done to the extent of one floor, at

Porchester, Kenilworth, and Richmond, and in many other Norman keeps.

In the Decorated Period great changes were certainly made. Doors

were opened at the ground level in the north and west walls. The

fore-building was removed, and in its stead a well-stair inserted in

the centre of the west wall, so as to provide a new and convenient

approach to each floor; and this was carried up to the end in a raised

turret, adding somewhat to the view. The entrance to this staircase

was at the ground floor on the outside, but it did not lead into the

basement. The whole of the west wall and the contiguous half of the

south wall were faced with ashlar, and window-cases of the period

inserted. All this may well have been the work of Anthony Beke, “Presul

Magnanimus,” called “the maist prowd and masterfull Busshop in all

England,” in that period—

When valour bow’d before the rood and book,

And kneeling knighthood served a Prelate lord.

The window recesses all through the building are mostly in the Norman

style, and therefore in almost every case much older than the windows

which they contain.

The three ends of the curtain abutting on the keep are of the same

workmanship with, and bond into it, and are about 30 feet high.

That proceeding northwards is capped at the north-east angle by a

stout bastion, with a salient angle of 110 degrees, two faces of 17

feet, and shoulders of 4 feet. This is evidently a rebuilding after

the introduction of artillery, and probably the work of Sir George

Bowes. This curtain is continued 30 feet further along the river face,

and is thence broken down. The kitchen seems to have been in the

angle, the hall next to it, and then the chapel, all built against

the north curtain. The curtain now standing corresponds closely to

what the survey of 1515 calls the long high wall from the Dongeon to

the north-west end of the kitchen (44 yards long and 30 feet high,

contremured, so as to be 28 feet thick). We are told that in 1551 the

chapel was 30 feet by 18 feet, with walls 8 feet thick, and with a

crypt below capable of stabling 20 horses, and a “closet” above, and

that the battlements above this closet and of the long wall were of

the same height, and so extended from the north-east angle of the keep

round to its south-west angle. In Sir George Bowes’s very able report

upon the castle, he advises strengthening this wall by filling the

hall and other buildings with earth, and forming a hall in the first

floor of the keep, which seems then to have been much such a ruin

as at present. Passing to the south-west angle of the keep, whence

springs the southern curtain of this inner ward, also 30 feet high and

very thick, this is continued 50 feet, and then broken by a nearly

rectangular bastion tower of 40 feet projection, and 30 feet breadth,

the “little Bulwark” of 1551;—a Decorated insertion to give a flanking

defence where it was much needed. In the rear of this tower, which

probably was of the nature of a bastion, that is not higher than the

curtain, are remains of buildings. Beyond it, a high bank of earth and

rubbish marks the line, but conceals the remains of the rest of the

curtain. In this bank, towards the west, a gap marks the position of

the gatehouse. The well remains near the north-east corner of the ward,

and indicates the general position of the kitchen.

The _Outer Ward_, or that part of the castle outside the ditch of the

inner ward, is of a lunated figure, 50 yards at the widest part. This

ditch was crossed at each end by the curtain. The lower part of the

wall at the east end still remains, and is about 8 feet thick, and

30 feet high, pierced by a Norman arch, probably for a postern, as

at Carlisle. The curtain along the northern front is gone. The slope

is there very steep, and in Sir George Bowes’s time this was trusted

to, and the wall was a mere low breastwork. More to the west, as far

as the lower gatehouse, the wall has been rebuilt. It is in parts

about 15 feet thick, and 10 feet high inside, and from 15 feet to 20

feet outside. It probably rests in part on a Norman foundation, but

the superstructure looks Decorated or later. It was pierced by deep

recesses 11 feet broad under a flat arch, splayed to a loop, and

intended to flank the approach from the town to the outer gate. Three

of these recesses remain, and probably there were two more.

The lower gatehouse is a rectangular block 40 feet long by 20 feet

broad, and of 30 feet projection within the curtain. It is pierced by

a passage 15 feet wide, reduced at each end and in the centre by gate

piers to 12 feet. These piers carried ribs to stiffen the barrel vault

of the passage. The arches were round-headed. There was no portcullis.

In front of the gate, as at Tickhill, are two projecting walls, between

which there was probably a drawbridge. There was an upper floor. This

gatehouse is evidently Norman, and no doubt Flambard’s work.

From the gatehouse eastward for about 130 yards the curtain is

represented by a high and steep bank of earth and rubbish, which, no

doubt, contains its foundations. The ground rises, and the original

bank, as well as the curtain upon it, were evidently raised to command

the platform opposite and beyond the ditch, which seems to have been

the favourite position for besiegers. The curtain recommences, and is

continued for 80 yards along the high ground, forming the east end of

the southern front. This part of the curtain is very curious, and not

a little difficult to understand. Upon it are the remains of one, or

perhaps two, polygonal bastions, but in the line of the wall, between

them, are six round-headed arches of about 12 feet span, springing from

square piers about 3 feet or 4 feet broad. Most of the masonry is so

rough that it evidently was intended, as at Southampton Castle, to be

covered with earth, though why, while the foundation was excellent,

this mode of supporting the curtain should have been employed, is

not clear; but the first, that is, the most western, of these arches

is of ashlar, and seems to have been a gateway, and is probably the

gateway mentioned in the history of the castle as having had its gates

unskilfully hung upon gudgeons so placed that they could be lifted off

from the outside. Beyond these arches and bastions the curtain makes a

sharp turn, and proceeds northwards to 60 yards, to cross the ditch and

join the keep.

Mediæval Military Architecture in England, Volume 2 (of 2) · 第 38 / 65 段