I. INTRODUCTION.

Much concern has arisen in late years in the minds of architects

because of the faulty acoustics that exist in many auditoriums. The

prevalence of echoes and reverberations with the consequent difficulty

in hearing and understanding on the part of the auditor defeats the

purpose of the auditorium and diminishes its value.

The Auditorium at the University of Illinois presents such a case. The

building is shaped nearly like a hemisphere, with several large arches

and recesses to break up the regularity of its inner surface. The

original plans of the architect were curtailed because of insufficient

money appropriated for the construction. The interior of the hall,

therefore, was built absolutely plain with almost no breaking up of the

large, smooth wall surfaces; and, at first, there were no furnishings

except the seats and the cocoa matting in the aisles. The acoustical

properties proved to be very unsatisfactory. A reverberation or undue

prolongation of the sound existed, and in addition, because of the

large size of the room and the form and position of the walls, echoes

were set up.

If an observer stood on the platform and clapped his hands, a veritable

chaos of sound resulted. Echoes were heard from every direction and

reverberations continued for a number of seconds before all was still

again. Speakers found their utterances thrown back at them, and

auditors all over the house experienced difficulty in understanding

what was said. On one occasion the University band played a piece which

featured a xylophone solo with accompaniment by the other instruments.

It so happened that the leader heard the echo more strongly than the

direct sound and beat time with it. Players near the xylophone kept

time to the direct sound, while those farther away followed the echo.

The confusion may well be imagined.

Thus it seemed that the Auditorium was doomed to be an acoustical

horror; that speakers and singers would avoid it, and that auditors

would attend entertainments in it only under protest. But the apparent

misfortune was in one way a benefit since it provided an opportunity

to study defective acoustics under exceptionally good conditions

and led to conclusions that not only allowed the Auditorium to be

improved but also indicate some of the pitfalls to be avoided in future

construction of other halls.

[Illustration: FIG. 2. PHOTOGRAPH OF INTERIOR. VIEW OF STAGE.]

[Illustration: FIG. 3. PHOTOGRAPH OF INTERIOR. VIEW TOWARD BALCONY.]

An investigation of the acoustical properties of the Auditorium was

begun in 1908 and has continued for six years. It was decided at the

outset not to use “cut and try” methods of cure, but to attack the

problem systematically so that general principles could be found, if

possible, that would apply not only to the case being investigated but

to auditoriums in general. This plan of procedure delayed the solution

of the problem, since it became necessary to study the theory of sound

and carry out laboratory investigations at the same time that the

complex conditions in the Auditorium were being considered. The author

spent one year of the six abroad studying the theory of acoustics and

inspecting various auditoriums.

The main echoes in the Auditorium were located by means of a new method

for tracing the path of sound, the time of reverberation was determined

by Sabine’s method, and a general diagnosis of the acoustical defects

was made. Hangings and curtains were installed in accordance with the

results of the study so that finally the acoustical properties were

improved.

_Acknowledgment._--The author desires to express his great appreciation

of the advice and encouragement given by President E. J. James,

Supervising Architect J. M. White, and Professor A. P. Carman of

the Physics Department. He desires also to acknowledge the material

assistance cheerfully rendered by the workmen at the University, which

contributed in no small degree to the successful solution of the

problem.

Acoustics of auditoriums · 第 8 / 27 题