Je ne crains pas le nom que je laisse après moi."

The peculiarly horrid manner in which the crime was committed, and the

audacious style in which the criminal appears to brave justice, will,

it is thought, prevent any _extenuating circumstances_ being pleaded,

as is usually done, for the purpose of commuting the punishment of

death into imprisonment with enforced labour. It is generally expected

that this atrocious murderer will be guillotined, notwithstanding the

averseness of the government to capital punishment.

The circumstances are, indeed, hideous in all ways, and the more so

from being mixed up with what is miscalled the tender passion. The

cannibal fury which sets a man to kill his foe that he may eat him,

has fully as much tenderness in it as this species of affection.

When "the passion is made up of nothing but the finest parts of love,"

it may, perhaps, deserve the epithet of tender; but we have heard of

late of so many horrible and deliberate assassinations, originating in

what newspapers are pleased to call "_une grande passion_" that the

first idea which a love-story now suggests to me is, that the sequel

will in all probability be murder "most foul, strange, and unnatural!"

Is there in any language a word that can raise so many shuddering

sensations as "_La Morgue_?" Hatred, revenge, murder, are each

terrible; but La Morgue outdoes them all in its power of bringing

together in one syllable the abstract of whatever is most appalling in

crime, poverty, despair, and death.

To the ghastly Morgue are conveyed the unowned dead of every

description that are discovered in or near Paris. The Seine is the

great receptacle which first receives the victims of assassination or

despair; but they are not long permitted to elude the vigilance of the

Parisian police: a huge net, stretched across the river at St. Cloud,

receives and retains whatever the stream brings down; and anything

that retains a trace of human form which is found amidst the product

of the fearful draught is daily conveyed to La Morgue;--DAILY; for

rarely does it chance that for four-and-twenty hours its melancholy

biers remain unoccupied; often do eight, ten, a dozen corpses at a

time arrive by the frightful caravan from "_les filets de St. Cloud_."

I have, in common with most people, I believe, a very strong

propensity within me for seeing everything connected directly or

indirectly with any subject or event which has strongly roused my

curiosity, or interested my feelings; but, strange to say, I never

feel its influence so irresistible as when something of shuddering

horror is mixed with the spectacle. It is this propensity which has

now induced me to visit this citadel of death;--this low and solitary

roof, placed in the very centre of moving, living, laughing Paris.

No visit to a tomb, however solemn or however sad, can approach in

thrilling horror to the sensation caused by passing the threshold of

this charnel-house.

The tomb calls us to the contemplation of the common, the inevitable

lot; but this gathering place of sin and death arouses thoughts of all

that most outrages nature, and most foully violates the sanctuary of

life, into which God has breathed his spirit. But I was steadfast in

my will to visit it, and I have done it.

The building is a low, square, carefully-whited structure, situated on

the Quai de la Cité. It is open to all; and it is fearful to think how

many anxious hearts have entered, how many despairing ones have

quitted it.

On entering I found myself in a sort of low hall which contained no

object whatever. If I mistake not, there is a chamber on each side of

it: but it was to the left hand that I was led, and it was thither

that about a dozen persons who entered at the same time either

followed or preceded me. I do not too well remember how I reached the

place where the bodies are visible; but I know that I stood before one

of three large windows, through the panes of which, and very near to

them, lighted also by windows in the roof, are seen a range of biers,

sloping towards the spectator at an angle that gives the countenance

as well as the whole figure of the persons extended on them fully to

view.

In this manner I saw the bodies of four men stretched out before me;

but their aspect bore no resemblance to death--neither were they

swollen or distorted in any way, but so discoloured as to give them

exactly the appearance of bronze statues.

Two out of the four had evidently been murdered, for their heads and

throats gave frightful evidence of the violence that had been

practised upon them; the third was a mere boy, who probably met his

fate by accident: but that the fourth was a suicide, it was hardly

possible to doubt; even in death his features held the desperate

expression that might best paint the state of mind likely to lead to

such an act.

It was past mid-day when we entered the Morgue; but neither of the

bodies had yet been claimed or recognised.

This spectacle naturally set me upon seeking information, wherever I

was likely to find it, respecting the average number of bodies thus

exposed within the year, the proportion of them believed to be

suicides, and the causes generally supposed most influential in

producing this dreadful termination.

I will not venture to repeat the result of these inquiries in figures,

as I doubt if the information I received was of that strictly accurate

kind which could justify my doing so; yet it was quite enough so, to

excite both horror and astonishment at the extraordinary number which

are calculated to perish annually at Paris by self-slaughter.

In many recent instances, the causes which have led to these desperate

deeds have been ascertained by the written acknowledgment of the

perpetrators themselves, left as a legacy to mankind. Such a legacy

might perhaps not be wholly unprofitable to the survivors, were it not

that the motives assigned, in almost every instance where they have

been published, have been of so frivolous and contemptible a nature as

to turn wholesome horror to most ill-placed mirth.

It can hardly be doubted, from the testimony of these singular

documents, that many young Frenchmen perish yearly in this guilty and

deplorable manner for no other reason in the world than the hope of

being talked of afterwards.

Had some solitary instance of so perverted a vanity been found among

these records, it might perhaps have been considered as no more

incredible than various other proofs of the enfeebling effects of this

paltry passion on the judgment, and have been set down to insanity,

produced by excessive egotism: but nothing short of the posthumous

testimony of the persons themselves could induce any one to believe

that scarcely a week passes without such an event, from such a cause,

taking place in Paris.

In many instances, I am told that the good sense of surviving friends

has led them to disobey the testamentary instructions left by the

infatuated young men who have thus acted, requesting that the wretched

reasonings which have led them to it should be published. But, in a

multitude of cases, the "Constitutionnel" and other journals of the

same stamp have their columns filled with reasons why these poor

reckless creatures have dared the distant justice of their Creator, in

the hope that their unmeaning names should be echoed through Paris for

a day.

It is not long since two young men--mere youths--entered a

_restaurant_, and bespoke a dinner of unusual luxury and expense, and

afterwards arrived punctually at the appointed hour to eat it. They

did so, apparently with all the zest of youthful appetite and youthful

glee. They called for champagne, and quaffed it hand in hand. No

symptom of sadness, thought, or reflection of any kind was observed to

mix with their mirth, which was loud, long, and unremitting. At last

came the _café noir_, the cognac, and the bill: one of them was seen

to point out the amount to the other, and then both burst out afresh

into violent laughter. Having swallowed each his cup of coffee to the

dregs, the _garçon_ was ordered to request the company of the

_restaurateur_ for a few minutes. He came immediately, expecting

perhaps to receive his bill, minus some extra charge which the jocund

but economical youths might deem exorbitant.

Instead of this, however, the elder of the two informed him that the

dinner had been excellent, which was the more fortunate as it was

decidedly the last that either of them should ever eat: that for his

bill, he must of necessity excuse the payment of it, as in fact they

neither of them possessed a single sous: that upon no other occasion

would they thus have violated the customary etiquette between guest

and landlord; but that finding this world, its toils and its troubles,

unworthy of them, they had determined once more to enjoy a repast of

which their poverty must for ever prevent the repetition, and

then--take leave of existence for ever! For the first part of this

resolution, he declared that it had, thanks to his cook and his

cellar, been achieved nobly; and for the last, it would soon

follow--for the _café noir_, besides the little glass of his admirable

cognac, had been medicated with that which would speedily settle all

their accounts for them.

The _restaurateur_ was enraged. He believed no part of the

rhodomontade but that which declared their inability to discharge the

bill, and he talked loudly, in his turn, of putting them into the

hands of the police. At length, however, upon their offering to give

him their address, he was persuaded to let them depart.

On the following day, either the hope of obtaining his money, or some

vague fear that they might have been in earnest in the wild tale that

they had told him, induced this man to go to the address they had left

with him; and he there heard that the two unhappy boys had been that

morning found lying together hand in hand, on a bed hired a few weeks

before by one of them. When they were discovered, they were already

dead and quite cold.

On a small table in the room lay many written papers, all expressing

aspirations after greatness that should cost neither labour nor care,

a profound contempt for those who were satisfied to live by the sweat

of their brow--sundry quotations from Victor Hugo, and a request that

their names and the manner of their death might be transmitted to the

newspapers.

Many are the cases recorded of young men, calling themselves dear

friends, who have thus encouraged each other to make their final exit

from life, if not with applause, at least with effect. And more

numerous still are the tales recounted of young men and women found

dead, and locked in each other's arms; fulfilling literally, and with

most sad seriousness, the destiny sketched so merrily in the old

song:--

Gai, gai, marions-nous--

Mettons-nous dans la misère;

Gai, gai, marions-nous--

Mettons-nous la corde au cou.

I have heard it remarked by several individuals among those who are

watching with no unphilosophical eyes many ominous features of the

present time and the present race, or rather perhaps of that portion

of the population which stand apart from the rest in dissolute

idleness, that the worst of all its threatening indications is the

reckless, hard indifference, and gladiator-like contempt of death,

which is nurtured, taught, and lauded as at once the foundation and

perfection of all human wisdom and of all human virtue.

In place of the firmness derived from hope and resignation, these

unhappy sophists seek courage in desperation, and consolation in

notoriety. With this key to the philosophy of the day, it is not

difficult to read its influence on many a countenance that one meets

among those who are lounging in listless laziness on the Boulevards or

in the gardens of Paris.

The aspect of these figures is altogether unlike what we may too often

see among those who linger, sunken, pale, and hopeless, on the benches

of our parks, or loiter under porticos and colonnades, as if waiting

for courage to beg. Hunger and intemperance often leave blended traces

on such figures as these, exciting at once pity and disgust. I have

encountered at Paris nothing like this: whether any such exist, I know

not; but if they do, their beat is distant from the public walks and

fashionable promenades. Instead of these, however, there is a race who

seem to live there, less wretched perhaps in actual want of bread, but

as evidently thriftless, homeless, and friendless as the other. On the

faces of such, one may read a state of mind wholly different,--less

degraded, but still more perverted;--a wild, bold eye, that rather

seeks than turns from every passing glance--unshrinking hardihood, but

founded more on indifference than endurance, and a scornful sneer for

any who may suffer curiosity to conquer disgust, while they fix their

eye for a moment upon a figure that looks in all ways as if got up to

enact the hero of a melodrame. Were I the king, or the minister

either, I should think it right to keep an eye of watchfulness upon

all such picturesque individuals; for one might say most truly,

"Yon Cassius hath a lean and hungry look;

He thinks too much: such men are dangerous."

The friend to whom I addressed myself on the subject of these

constantly-recurring suicides told me that there was great reason to

believe that the increase of this crime, so remarkable during the last

few years, might be almost wholly attributed to the "light

literature," as it is called, of the period:--dark literature would be

a fitter name for it.

The total absence of anything approaching to a virtuous principle of

action in every fictitious character held up to admiration throughout

all the tales and dramas of the _décousu_ school, while every hint of

religion is banished as if it were treason to allude to it, is in

truth quite enough to account for every species of depravity in those

who make such characters their study and their model. "How oft and by

how many shall they be laughed to scorn!"--yet believing all the

while, poor souls! that they are producing a sensation, and that the

eyes of Europe are fixed upon them, notwithstanding they once worked

as a tailor or a tinker, or at some other such unpoetical handiwork;

for they may all be described in the words of Ecclesiasticus, with a

very slight alteration,--"They would maintain the state of the world,

and all their desire is in (forgetting) the work of their craft."

Paris and the Parisians in 1835 (Vol. 1) · 第 58 / 65 题