III

The winter of 1856-57 passed without my knowing more of the capital than

its official world. Even the next year, when I began to make some

acquaintance with the social world, it was with an alien or adoptive

phase of it, as I realize with tardy surprise. There were then so many

Germans in Ohio that an edition of the laws had to be printed in their

language, and there was a common feeling that we ought to know their

language, if not their literature, which was really what I cared more to

know. I carried my knowledge of it so far as to render a poem of my own

into German verse which won the praise of my teacher; and I wish I could

remember who he was, gentle, tobacco-smoked shade that he has long since

become, or who the German editor of what _republikanische Zeitung_ was

that sometimes shared my instruction with him. There were also two

blithe German youths who availed with me in the loan of Goethe's

_Wahlverwandschaften_, and gave me some fencing lessons in their

noonings. I forget what employ they were of, but their uncle was a

watchmaker and jeweler, and my father got him to gold-plate his silver

watch, or dye it, as he preferred to say. When the Civil War came he

went into it and was killed; and many years afterward, in my love and

honor of him, I turned his ghost into a loved and honored character in

_A Hazard of New Fortunes_. He was a political refugee, of those German

revolutionists who came to us after the revolts of 1848, and he still

dwells venerable in my memory, with his noble, patriarchally bearded

head.

But it all appears very fantastic in the retrospect, that Teutonic

period of my self-culture, and I am not sure that one fact of it is more

fantastic than another. Such was my zeal for everything German that I

once lunched at one of the German beer-saloons which rather abounded in

Columbus, on Swiss cheese with French mustard spread over it and a tall

glass of lager beer, then much valued as a possible transition from the

use of the strong waters more habitual with Americans than now; but it

made me very sick, and I was obliged to forego it as an expression of my

love for German poetry. To a little earlier period must have belonged

the incident of my going to see "_Die Räuber_" of Schiller, which I

endured with iron resolution from the beginning to the end. It was

given, I believe, by amateurs, and I tried my best to imagine that I

understood it as it went on, but probably I did not, though I would have

been loath to own the fact to any of the few German families who then

formed my whole acquaintance with society. I never afterward met them at

American houses; the cleavage between the two races in everything but

politics was absolute; though the Germans were largely anti-slavery, and

this formed common ground for them and natives of like thinking who did

not know them socially.

In those first winters my knowledge of American society was confined to

the generalized hospitality of the large evening receptions which some

of the leading citizens used to give the two Houses of the legislature,

including the correspondents and reporters attached to them. I cannot

say just how or when I began to divine that these occasions were not of

the first fashion, though the hosts and hostesses might have been so.

There were great suppers, mainly of oysters, to which our distance from

the sea lent distinction, and ice-cream, and sometimes, if I may trust a

faint reverberation from the past as of blown corks, champagne. There

was also dancing, and when some large, old-fashioned house was not large

enough, a wooden pavilion was improvised over the garden to give the

waltzes and quadrilles verge enough. I recall my share in the suppers,

if not in the dancing, but my deficiency was far more than made up by

the excess of a friend, who must then have been hard upon sixty years of

age, yet was of a charming gaiety and an unimpaired youthfulness. He

stood up in every quadrille, and he danced to the end of the evening,

with a demure smile on his comely, smooth-shaven, rosy face, and a

light, mocking self-consciousness in his kind eyes, as if he would agree

as to any incongruity the spectator might find in his performance. He

was one of the clerks of the House, an old politician, and the editor of

a leading Cleveland newspaper, which he chose to leave for the pleasures

of the capital. From his experience of the system which he was part of

he whimsically professed to believe that as great legislative wisdom

could be assembled by knocking down every other man in a crowd and

dragging him into the House or Senate as by the actual method of

nomination and election. At times he would support the theory of a

benevolent despotism, and advocate the establishment of what he called a

one-man power as the ideal form of government. I owed him much in the

discharge of duties which my finding the most important in the world

must have amused him, and when he went back to his newspaper he left me

to write the legislative letters for it.

This gentle reactionary was the antithesis of another very interesting

man, known to his fellow-legislators as Citizen Corry, in recognition of

his preference for the type of French Red Republicanism acquired in

Paris during his stay through the academic republic of 1848-50. Such a

residence would alone have given him a distinction which we can hardly

realize in our time, but he was, besides, a man of great natural

distinction, and of more cultivation than any of his fellow-legislators.

He was one of the Representatives from Cincinnati, and when another

Cincinnati Representative of his own party struck a member from the

Western Reserve, Citizen Corry joined the Republicans in voting his

expulsion. But he had already made a greater sensation, and created an

expectation of the unexpected in all he did by proposing an amendment to

the Constitution abolishing the system of dual chambers in the

legislature, and retaining only the House of Representatives. I think

that in Greece alone is this the actual parliamentary form, but I

believe that it was in that short-lived French republic of 1848 that

Corry saw its workings and conceived the notion of its superiority.

Under the present system he held that the House was merely a committee

at the bar of the Senate, and the Senate a committee at the bar of the

House, with a great waste of time and public advantage through the

working of a very clumsy machinery. His proposition was not taken

seriously by the Ohio House of Representatives, but to my young

enthusiasm it seemed convincing by its mere statement, and the arguments

on the other side, to the effect that the delays which he censured gave

time for useful reflection, appeared to me very fallacious. Citizen

Corry was not re-elected to the next legislature, and his somewhat

meteoric history did not include any other official apparition. But

while he was passing through the orbit of my world I was fully aware of

his vivid difference from the controlled and orderly planets, and he

dazzled in me an imagination always too fondly seeking the bizarre and

strange. I do not think I ever spoke with him, but I tingled to do so; I

created him citizen of that fine and great world where I had so much of

my own being in reveries that rapt me from the realities of the life

about me.

Years of My Youth · 第 37 / 58 题