CHAPTER XL.

AFTER TWO YEARS TAKES SHIP FOR CHINA. DISASTROUS PASSAGE TO JAVA; AND

THENCE TO CHINA; ARRIVES AT SHAN-TUNG; AND GOES TO NANKING. CONCLUSION

OR L’ENVOI BY ANOTHER WRITER.

Fâ-Hien abode in this country two years; and, in addition (to his

acquisitions in Patna), succeeded in getting a copy of the

Vinaya-pitaka of the Mahisasakah (school);(1) the Dirghagama and

Samyuktagama(2) (Sûtras); and also the Samyukta-sanchaya-pitaka;(3)—all

being works unknown in the land of Han. Having obtained these Sanskrit

works, he took passage in a large merchantman, on board of which there

were more than 200 men, and to which was attached by a rope a smaller

vessel, as a provision against damage or injury to the large one from

the perils of the navigation. With a favourable wind, they proceeded

eastwards for three days, and then they encountered a great wind. The

vessel sprang a leak and the water came in. The merchants wished to go

to the small vessel; but the men on board it, fearing that too many

would come, cut the connecting rope. The merchants were greatly

alarmed, feeling their risk of instant death. Afraid that the vessel

would fill, they took their bulky goods and threw them into the water.

Fâ-Hien also took his pitcher(4) and washing-basin, with some other

articles, and cast them into the sea; but fearing that the merchants

would cast overboard his books and images, he could only think with all

his heart of Kwan-she-yin,(5) and commit his life to (the protection

of) the church of the land of Han,(6) (saying in effect), “I have

travelled far in search of our Law. Let me, by your dread and

supernatural (power), return from my wanderings, and reach my

resting-place!”

In this way the tempest(7) continued day and night, till on the

thirteenth day the ship was carried to the side of an island, where, on

the ebbing of the tide, the place of the leak was discovered, and it

was stopped, on which the voyage was resumed. On the sea (hereabouts)

there are many pirates, to meet with whom is speedy death. The great

ocean spreads out, a boundless expanse. There is no knowing east or

west; only by observing the sun, moon, and stars was it possible to go

forward. If the weather were dark and rainy, (the ship) went as she was

carried by the wind, without any definite course. In the darkness of

the night, only the great waves were to be seen, breaking on one

another, and emitting a brightness like that of fire, with huge turtles

and other monsters of the deep (all about). The merchants were full of

terror, not knowing where they were going. The sea was deep and

bottomless, and there was no place where they could drop anchor and

stop. But when the sky became clear, they could tell east and west, and

(the ship) again went forward in the right direction. If she had come

on any hidden rock, there would have been no way of escape.

After proceeding in this way for rather more than ninety days, they

arrived at a country called Java-dvipa, where various forms of error

and Brahmanism are flourishing, while Buddhism in it is not worth

speaking of. After staying there for five months, (Fâ-Hien) again

embarked in another large merchantman, which also had on board more

than 200 men. They carried provisions for fifty days, and commenced the

voyage on the sixteenth day of the fourth month.

Fâ-Hien kept his retreat on board the ship. They took a course to the

north-east, intending to fetch Kwang-chow. After more than a month,

when the night-drum had sounded the second watch, they encountered a

black wind and tempestuous rain, which threw the merchants and

passengers into consternation. Fâ-Hien again with all his heart

directed his thoughts to Kwan-she-yin and the monkish communities of

the land of Han; and, through their dread and mysterious protection,

was preserved to day-break. After day-break, the Brahmans deliberated

together and said, “It is having this Sramana on board which has

occasioned our misfortune and brought us this great and bitter

suffering. Let us land the bhikshu and place him on some island-shore.

We must not for the sake of one man allow ourselves to be exposed to

such imminent peril.” A patron of Fâ-Hien, however, said to them, “If

you land the bhikshu, you must at the same time land me; and if you do

not, then you must kill me. If you land this Sramana, when I get to the

land of Han, I will go to the king, and inform against you. The king

also reveres and believes the Law of Buddha, and honours the bhikshus.”

The merchants hereupon were perplexed, and did not dare immediately to

land (Fâ-Hien).

At this time the sky continued very dark and gloomy, and the

sailing-masters looked at one another and made mistakes. More than

seventy days passed (from their leaving Java), and the provisions and

water were nearly exhausted. They used the salt-water of the sea for

cooking, and carefully divided the (fresh) water, each man getting two

pints. Soon the whole was nearly gone, and the merchants took counsel

and said, “At the ordinary rate of sailing we ought to have reached

Kwang-chow, and now the time is passed by many days;—must we not have

held a wrong course?” Immediately they directed the ship to the

north-west, looking out for land; and after sailing day and night for

twelve days, they reached the shore on the south of mount Lao,(8) on

the borders of the prefecture of Ch’ang-kwang,(8) and immediately got

good water and vegetables. They had passed through many perils and

hardships, and had been in a state of anxious apprehension for many

days together; and now suddenly arriving at this shore, and seeing

those (well-known) vegetables, the lei and kwoh,(9) they knew indeed

that it was the land of Han. Not seeing, however, any inhabitants nor

any traces of them, they did not know whereabouts they were. Some said

that they had not yet got to Kwang-chow, and others that they had

passed it. Unable to come to a definite conclusion, (some of them) got

into a small boat and entered a creek, to look for some one of whom

they might ask what the place was. They found two hunters, whom they

brought back with them, and then called on Fâ-Hien to act as

interpreter and question them. Fâ-Hien first spoke assuringly to them,

and then slowly and distinctly asked them, “Who are you?” They replied,

“We are disciples of Buddha?” He then asked, “What are you looking for

among these hills?” They began to lie,(10) and said, “To-morrow is the

fifteenth day of the seventh month. We wanted to get some peaches to

present(11) to Buddha.” He asked further, “What country is this?” They

replied, “This is the border of the prefecture of Ch’ang-kwang, a part

of Ts’ing-chow under the (ruling) House of Tsin.” When they heard this,

the merchants were glad, immediately asked for (a portion of) their

money and goods, and sent men to Ch’ang-kwang city.

The prefect Le E was a reverent believer in the Law of Buddha. When he

heard that a Sramana had arrived in a ship across the sea, bringing

with him books and images, he immediately came to the seashore with an

escort to meet (the traveller), and receive the books and images, and

took them back with him to the seat of his government. On this the

merchants went back in the direction of Yang-chow;(12) (but) when

(Fâ-Hien) arrived at Ts’ing-chow, (the prefect there)(13) begged him

(to remain with him) for a winter and a summer. After the summer

retreat was ended, Fâ-Hien, having been separated for a long time from

his (fellow-)masters, wished to hurry to Ch’ang-gan; but as the

business which he had in hand was important, he went south to the

Capital;(14) and at an interview with the masters (there) exhibited the

Sûtras and the collection of the Vinaya (which he had procured).

After Fâ-Hien set out from Ch’ang-gan, it took him six years to reach

Central India;(15) stoppages there extended over (other) six years; and

on his return it took him three years to reach Ts’ing-chow. The

countries through which he passed were a few under thirty. From the

sandy desert westwards on to India, the beauty of the dignified

demeanour of the monkhood and of the transforming influence of the Law

was beyond the power of language fully to describe; and reflecting how

our masters had not heard any complete account of them, he therefore

(went on) without regarding his own poor life, or (the dangers to be

encountered) on the sea upon his return, thus incurring hardships and

difficulties in a double form. He was fortunate enough, through the

dread power of the three Honoured Ones,(15) to receive help and

protection in his perils; and therefore he wrote out an account of his

experiences, that worthy readers might share with him in what he had

heard and said.(15)

It was in the year Keah-yin,(16) the twelfth year of the period E-he of

the (Eastern) Tsin dynasty, the year-star being in Virgo-Libra, in the

summer, at the close of the period of retreat, that I met the devotee

Fâ-Hien. On his arrival I lodged him with myself in the winter

study,(17) and there, in our meetings for conversation, I asked him

again and again about his travels. The man was modest and complaisant,

and answered readily according to the truth. I thereupon advised him to

enter into details where he had at first only given a summary, and he

proceeded to relate all things in order from the beginning to the end.

He said himself, “When I look back on what I have gone through, my

heart is involuntarily moved, and the perspiration flows forth. That I

encountered danger and trod the most perilous places, without thinking

of or sparing myself, was because I had a definite aim, and thought of

nothing but to do my best in my simplicity and straightforwardness.

Thus it was that I exposed my life where death seemed inevitable, if I

might accomplish but a ten-thousandth part of what I hoped.” These

words affected me in turn, and I thought:—“This man is one of those who

have seldom been seen from ancient times to the present. Since the

Great Doctrine flowed on to the East there has been no one to be

compared with Hien in his forgetfulness of self and search for the Law.

Henceforth I know that the influence of sincerity finds no obstacle,

however great, which it does not overcome, and that force of will does

not fail to accomplish whatever service it undertakes. Does not the

accomplishing of such service arise from forgetting (and disregarding)

what is (generally) considered as important, and attaching importance

to what is (generally) forgotten?”

NOTES

(1) No. 1122 in Nanjio’s Catalogue, translated into Chinese by

Buddhajiva and a Chinese Sramana about A.D. 425. Mahisasakah means “the

school of the transformed earth,” or “the sphere within which the Law

of Buddha is influential.” The school is one of the subdivisions of the

Sarvastivadah.

(2) Nanjio’s 545 and 504. The Agamas are Sûtras of the hinayana,

divided, according to Eitel, pp. 4, 5, into four classes, the first or

Dirghagamas (long Agamas) being treatises on right conduct, while the

third class contains the Samyuktagamas (mixed Agamas).

(3) Meaning “Miscellaneous Collections;” a sort of fourth Pitaka. See

Nanjio’s fourth division of the Canon, containing Indian and Chinese

miscellaneous works. But Dr. Davids says that no work of this name is

known either in Sanskrit or Pâli literature.

(4) We have in the text a phonetisation of the Sanskrit Kundika, which

is explained in Eitel by the two characters that follow, as=“washing

basin,” but two things evidently are intended.

(5) See chap. xvi, note 23.

(6) At his novitiate Fâ-Hien had sought the refuge of the “three

Precious Ones” (the three Refuges {.} {.} of last chapter), of which

the congregation or body of the monks was one; and here his thoughts

turn naturally to the branch of it in China. His words in his heart

were not exactly words of prayer, but very nearly so.

(7) In the text {.} {.}, ta-fung, “the great wind,”=the typhoon.

(8) They had got to the south of the Shan-tung promontory, and the foot

of mount Lao, which still rises under the same name on the extreme

south of the peninsula, east from Keao Chow, and having the district of

Tsieh-mih on the east of it. All the country there is included in the

present Phing-too Chow of the department Lae-chow. The name Phing-too

dates from the Han dynasty, but under the dynasty of the After Ch’e {.}

{.}, (A.D. 479-501), it was changed into Ch’ang-kwang. Fâ-Hien may have

lived, and composed the narrative of his travels, after the change of

name was adopted. See the Topographical Tables of the different

Dynasties ({.} {.} {.} {.} {.}), published in 1815.

(9) What these vegetables exactly were it is difficult to say; and

there are different readings of the characters for them. Williams’

Dictionary, under kwoh, brings the two names together in a phrase, but

the rendering of it is simply “a soup of simples.” For two or three

columns here, however, the text appears to me confused and imperfect.

(10) I suppose these men were really hunters; and, when brought before

Fâ-Hien, because he was a Sramana, they thought they would please him

by saying they were disciples of Buddha. But what had disciples of

Buddha to do with hunting and taking life? They were caught in their

own trap, and said they were looking for peaches.

(11) The Chinese character here has occurred twice before, but in a

different meaning and connexion. Rémusat, Beal, and Giles take it as

equivalent to “to sacrifice.” But his followers do not “sacrifice” to

Buddha. That is a priestly term, and should not be employed of anything

done at Buddhistic services.

(12) Probably the present department of Yang-chow in Keang-soo; but as

I have said in a previous note, the narrative does not go on so clearly

as it generally does.

(13) Was, or could, this prefect be Le E?

(14) Probably not Ch’ang-gan, but Nan-king, which was the capital of

the Eastern Tsin dynasty under another name.

(15) The whole of this paragraph is probably Fâ-Hien’s own conclusion

of his narrative. The second half of the second sentence, both in

sentiment and style in the Chinese text, seems to necessitate our

ascribing it to him, writing on the impulse of his own thoughts, in the

same indirect form which he adopted for his whole narrative. There are,

however, two peculiar phraseologies in it which might suggest the work

of another hand. For the name India, where the first (15) is placed, a

character is employed which is similarly applied nowhere else; and

again, “the three Honoured Ones,” at which the second (15) is placed,

must be the same as “the three Precious Ones,” which we have met with

so often; unless we suppose that {.} {.} is printed in all the

revisions for {.} {.}, “the World-honoured one,” which has often

occurred. On the whole, while I accept this paragraph as Fâ-Hien’s own,

I do it with some hesitation. That the following and concluding

paragraph is from another hand, there can be no doubt. And it is as

different as possible in style from the simple and straightforward

narrative of Fâ-Hien.

(16) There is an error of date here, for which it is difficult to

account. The year Keah-yin was A.D. 414; but that was the tenth year of

the period E-he, and not the twelfth, the cyclical designation of which

was Ping-shin. According to the preceding paragraph, Fâ-Hien’s travels

had occupied him fifteen years, so that counting from A.D. 399, the

year Ke-hae, as that in which he set out, the year of his getting to

Ts’ing-chow would have been Kwei-chow, the ninth year of the period

E-he; and we might join on “This year Keah-yin” to that paragraph, as

the date at which the narrative was written out for the bamboo-tablets

and the silk, and then begins the Envoy, “In the twelfth year of E-he.”

This would remove the error as it stands at present, but unfortunately

there is a particle at the end of the second date ({.}), which seems to

tie the twelfth year of E-he to Keah-yin, as another designation of it.

The “year-star” is the planet Jupiter, the revolution of which, in

twelve years, constitutes “a great year.” Whether it would be possible

to fix exactly by mathematical calculation in what year Jupiter was in

the Chinese zodiacal sign embracing part of both Virgo and Scorpio, and

thereby help to solve the difficulty of the passage, I do not know, and

in the meantime must leave that difficulty as I have found it.

(17) We do not know who the writer of the Envoy was. “The winter study

or library” would be the name of the apartment in his monastery or

house, where he sat and talked with Fâ-Hien.

A Record of Buddhistic Kingdoms Being an account by the Chinese monk Fa-hsien of travels in India and Ceylon (A.D. 399-414) in search of the Buddhist books of discipline · 第 40 / 40 章