"Common things are quite as much neglected and despised in the

education of the rich as in that of the poor. It is wonderful _how

little_ a young gentleman may know when he has taken his university

degrees, _especially if he has been industrious, and has stuck to his

studies_. He may really _spend a long time in looking for somebody

more ignorant than himself_. If he talks with the driver of the

stage-coach that lands him at his father's door, he finds he knows

nothing of horses. If he falls into conversation with a gardener, he

knows nothing of plants or flowers. If he walks into the fields, he

does not know the difference between barley, rye, and wheat; between

rape and turnips; between natural and artificial grass. If he goes

into a carpenter's yard, he does not know one wood from another. If

he comes across an attorney, he has no idea of the difference between

common and statute law, and is wholly in the dark as to those

securities of personal and political liberty on which we pride

ourselves. If he talks with a country magistrate, he finds his only

idea of the office is that the gentleman is a sort of English Sheik,

as the Mayor of the neighboring borough is a sort of Cadi. If he

strolls into any workshop or place of manufacture, it is always to

find his level, and that a level far below the present company. If he

dines out, and as a youth of proved talents and perhaps university

honors is expected to be literary, his literature is confined to a

few popular novels--the novels of the last century, or even of the

last generation--history and poetry having been almost studiously

omitted in his education. _The girl who has never stirred from home,

and whose education has been economized, not to say neglected, in

order to send her own brother to college_, knows vastly more of those

things than he does. The same exposure awaits him wherever he goes,

and whenever he has the audacity to open his mouth. _At sea he is a

landlubber; in the country a cockney; in town a greenhorn; in science

an ignoramus; in business a simpleton; in pleasure a

milksop_--everywhere out of his element, everywhere at sea, in the

clouds, adrift, or by whatever word _utter ignorance_ and

_incapacity_ are to be described. In society and in the work of life,

he finds himself beaten by the youth whom at college he despised as

frivolous or abhorred as profligate."

Take the preparation of our youth for their duties as citizens. Here,

again, a knowledge of political and social economy is indispensable. We

have seen the attention it receives; and while two lessons a week for one

hour, and that only to the senior class in its last term, are given to

American citizens on the Constitution of the United States and on

International Law, _none whatever is given on the science of Government

throughout the entire course of five years_!

I might go through the whole course of studies with similar results. Here

and there, in this or that class, a small amount of attention is given to

some of the sciences omitted in the other classes; but the entire record

is one of the most disheartening character.

_Words! words!_ engross almost exclusively the attention of the students

from the hour they enter the College until they leave it; and it is not to

the five-and-twenty graduates the palm of useful industry should be

awarded, but to the many who, in discouragement, abandon a course which

tends to _unfit_ them for the great battle of life!

What, then, are the reasons generally assigned for this perverse

conventionalism of devoting the time of youth to the acquirement of dead

words, to the unavoidable exclusion of nearly every thing that is of

value? First, we are told that we can not understand the English language

without a knowledge of Latin, from which it is derived. The inaccuracy of

this pretension is at once made manifest by reference to Webster, where he

states:

"That English is composed of--

"_First._ Saxon and Danish words of Teutonic and Gothic origin.

"_Second._ British or Welsh, Cornish and Amoric, which may be

considered as of Celtic origin.

"_Third._ Norman, a mixture of French and Gothic.

"_Fourth._ Latin, a language formed on the Celtic and Teutonic.

"_Fifth._ French, chiefly Latin corrupted, but with a mixture of

Celtic.

"_Sixth._ Greek formed on the Celtic and Teutonic, with some Coptic.

"_Seventh._ A few words directly from the Italian, Spanish, German,

and other languages of the Continent.

"_Eighth._ A few foreign words, introduced by commerce, or by

political and literary intercourse.

"Of these, _the Saxon words constitute our mother-tongue_, being

words which our ancestors brought with them from Asia.

"The Danish and Welsh also are primitive words, and may be considered

as a part of our vernacular language. They are of equal antiquity

with the Chaldee and Syriac."

But even were it true that our language was derived from the Latin,

wherein lies the difficulty in the way of the teacher explaining to his

pupils the meanings of the parts of English words which are of Latin

origin, without the necessity of the pupil's acquiring the same knowledge

by the roundabout process of learning one thousand words he will never

need, for one that may at some time be to him of some service as a

mnemonic?

Driven from this position, the advocates of "_classical_" studies tell us

that the study of Latin and Greek serves as a training for the intellect.

Unquestionably the exercise of the faculties of the mind serves to develop

the faculties so exercised; yet if this were the object to be attained,

Hebrew, nay, Chinese, would be preferable to Latin; but SCIENCE develops

the same faculties, and far more efficiently. The facts of science to be

stored up in the mind are so infinite in number and magnitude that no man,

however gifted, could ever hope to master them all, though he were to live

a thousand years. But their arrangement in scientific order not only

develops the analytical powers of the mind, but exercises the memory in a

method infinitely more useful and powerful than the study of any language.

Finally we are told classical studies develop the taste. If then to this

the advocates of such studies are driven, its mere announcement must

suffice to banish Latin and Greek from all schools supported by taxation;

for however essential it may be to provide the means of the best possible

instruction, it is as absolutely out of the sphere of the Trustees of

Public Moneys to provide, at the public expense, so _mere a luxury_ as on

this hypothesis Latin and Greek must be, as it would be to provide the

public with costly jewels! But even for the cultivation and development of

art and taste, SCIENCE is the true curriculum!

He who is ignorant of anatomy can not appreciate either sculpture or

painting! A knowledge of optics, of botany and of natural history, are

necessary, equally to the artist or to the connoisseur; a knowledge of

acoustics to the musician and musical critic. "No artist," says Mr.

Spencer, "can produce a healthful work of whatever kind without he

understands the laws of the phenomena he represents; he must also

understand how the minds of the spectator or listener will be affected by

his work--a question of psychology." The spectator or listener must

equally be acquainted with the laws of such phenomena, or he fails to

attain to the highest appreciation.

I now come to the last and most serious aspect of this question, and I

fearlessly assert that classical studies have a most pernicious influence

upon the morals and character of their votaries.

It should not be forgotten that Greeks and Romans alike lived by slavery

(which is robbery), by rapine, and by plunder; yet we, born into a

Christian community which lives by honest labor, propose to impregnate the

impressionable minds of youth with the morals and literature of nations of

robbers!

This letter has already extended to so great a length that I am compelled

to abstain from making extracts from the works of the greatest thinkers,

which I had desired: and I can now but cite them in support, more or less

pronounced, of the views above put forward, viz.: President Barnard, of

Columbia College, who with rare honesty and boldness has spoken loudly

against the conventional folly of classical studies; Professor Newman,

himself Professor of Latin at the University of London, England;

Professors Tindall, Henfry, Huxley, Forbes, Pajet, Whewell, Faraday,

Liebig, Draper, De Morgan, Lindley, Youmans, Drs. Hodgson, Carpenter,

Hooker, Acland, Sir John Herschell, Sir Charles Lyell, Dr. Seguin, and,

rising above them all in _educational science_, _Bastiat_ and _Herbert

Spencer_. To a modified extent, the name of Mr. John Stuart Mill may be

quoted--for he loudly advocates science for all--science, which is

unavoidably excluded by the introduction of, or at least the prominence

given to, Latin and Greek in our College. Mr. Mill, it is true also,

advocates classical studies, but for certain special classes which exist

in England who have no regular occupations in life.

Neither is it without importance as a guide to ourselves to observe that

in the very best school in this country--a school perhaps not surpassed by

any in the world, viz., the Military Academy at West Point--neither Latin

nor Greek studies are permitted.

If now, in any career whatever, any use could be found for Latin, it must

be in that of the professional soldier, to whom, if to any one, the

language and literature of the most military people the world has ever

seen, should be of some service. But no! the wise men who framed the

curriculum of West Point, though they knew that the study of the campaigns

of the Romans would be serviceable to their students, provided for their

study, _not_ by the roundabout method of first learning a language which

could never be of any other use, but by the direct method of the study of

those campaigns! Are the pupils of West Point generally found deficient in

intellect? Is not, on the contrary, the fact of having graduated at that

school a passport to the _highest scientific_ and _practical_ employment?

Our duty to the people is clear; let us neither waste the precious time of

our youth on worse than useless studies, nor the money of the citizens on

worse than useless expenditure.

I do earnestly hope that our Committee will give to my observations their

most serious deliberation. Let us come to no hasty conclusion on this

subject: accustomed as we have been to hear constantly repeated such

conventional phrases as that "Latin and Greek are essential to the

education of a gentleman;" that "classical studies are indispensable to a

liberal education;" to hear applauded to the echo orators who have

introduced into their speeches quotations of bad Latin or worse Greek by

audiences of whom not one in one thousand understand what was said. We

have been apt to receive such phrases as embodying truths, without ever

examining their foundations. I respectfully urge the Committee to consider

well before they act, to study the reasons assigned by the great thinkers

I have named for condemning, as, humbly following in their wake, I venture

to condemn, as worse than mere waste of time, the years devoted to Latin

and Greek studies.

Let us endeavor to make the College of this city worthy of the city and of

the state; let us cast aside the trammels of mediæval ignorance, and

supply to the pupils of the College "the culture demanded by modern life."

Let us in this, the first important matter which has come before our

Committee, act in harmony and without prejudice, for the welfare of the

College and "for the advancement of learning," and so prove ourselves

worthy of the sacred trust we have assumed.

I am, dear sir, very truly yours,

NATHANIEL SANDS,

_Member of "The Executive Committee for the Care,

Government, and Management of the College of the

City of New York."_

_The Philosophy of Teaching._

THE TEACHER, THE PUPIL, THE SCHOOL.

BY NATHANIEL SANDS.

8vo, Cloth, $1 00.

An interesting and valuable work, in which the science of teaching is

treated in a philosophical and practical manner, and a sketch is given of

a school to be established on the principles developed in his pages. Mr.

Sands takes the view that education, mental and physical, is but the

absorption of surrounding elements into the mind and body--an arrangement

and assimilation of materials so as to incorporate them into the being to

whose nourishment they are applied, just as the tree or plant assimilates

to its growth and subsistence the materials which it draws from the air

and the soil; and his theory of teaching is based on these truths.--_N. Y.

Times._

He advocates a radical change in the system of teaching youth. He proposes

a school where pupils shall be taught by illustrations from nature as well

as from books; where the museum, chemical laboratory, and workshop shall

find a place; where, in short, the mind of the learner shall not be

forced, but shall have just the kind of food suitable for its age and

development.--_N. Y. World._

Much has been written upon education--much that is both wise and

thoughtful, and much that has been but sound. Among the most thoughtful

and suggestive recent writings is an unpretentious work bearing the title

of "The Teacher, the Pupil, the School," by Mr. Nathaniel Sands. Small as

it is, it contains more ideas than many bulky volumes.--_N. Y. Tribune._

The question with which he mainly concerns himself is whether Latin and

Greek, and certain other branches, shall be taught to the exclusion of

more practical studies. He thinks that what is commonly known as the

"culture demanded by modern life"--chemistry, mining, anatomy, natural

history, political and social economy, the science of government,

etc.--should take the place now usurped by classical studies. Mr. Sands

believes in making no compromise between the useful sciences and the

classics. He condemns "as worse than mere waste of time the years devoted

to Greek and Latin," and would bar them out altogether.--_Journal of

Commerce._

Mr. Sands, who has just been appointed one of the new Board of Education,

has long been known as an advanced thinker on the subject he is now called

upon to deal with. He has published a pamphlet on the Philosophy of

Education.--_N. Y. Sun._

We have in this compact and unpretentious treatise a great deal of pith

and acumen, brought to bear upon a most important subject--that of

educational first principles. Mr. Sands has gone to the base of human

teaching, discarding pretentious themes, in order to illustrate the

simpler beauty of that eductive and inductive co-relationship which,

beginning at the mother's breast, proceeds through all the quiet processes

of mental development in infancy, childhood, and maturity.--_N. Y.

Dispatch._

His hints may well arrest the attention of thoughtful men.--_N. Y.

Tribune._

We commend it to the thoughtful consideration of all, but especially of

our public men. * * * Commissioners of Schools and others charged with

youthful training may advantageously consider the reflections.--_N. Y.

Evening Post._

HARPER & BROTHERS, PUBLISHERS,

FRANKLIN SQUARE, NEW YORK.

HARPER & BROTHERS _will send the above work by mail, postage prepaid, to

any part of the United States, on receipt of $1 00_.

WORKS ON EDUCATION

PUBLISHED BY

HARPER & BROTHERS, NEW YORK.

HARPER & BROTHERS _will send any of the following books by mail, postage

prepaid, to any part of the United States, on receipt of the price_.

HARPER'S CATALOGUE _and_ TRADE-LIST _will be sent by mail on receipt of

Five Cents, or they may be obtained gratuitously on application to the

Publishers personally_.

RANDALL'S POPULAR EDUCATION. First Principles of Popular Education and

Public Instruction. By S. S. RANDALL, Superintendent of Public Schools of

the City of New York. 12mo, Cloth, $1 50.

SANDS'S PHILOSOPHY OF TEACHING. The Teacher, the Pupil, the School. By

NATHANIEL SANDS. 8vo, Cloth.

BURTON'S OBSERVING FACULTIES. The Culture of the Observing Faculties in

the Family and the School; or, Things about Home, and how to make them

Instructive to the Young. By WARREN BURTON, Author of "The District School

as it was," "Helps to Education," &c. 16mo, Cloth, 75 cents.

CALKINS'S PRIMARY OBJECT LESSONS. Primary Object Lessons for a Graduated

Course of Development. A Manual for Teachers and Parents, with Lessons for

the Proper Training of the Faculties of the Children. By N. A. CALKINS.

Illustrations. 12mo, Cloth, $1 50.

WILLSON'S OBJECT LESSONS A Manual of Information and Suggestions for

Object Lessons, in a Course of Elementary Instruction. Adapted to the Use

of the School and Family Charts, and other Aids in Teaching. By MARCIUS

WILLSON. 12mo, Cloth, $1 50.

ABBOTT'S TEACHER. Moral Influences Employed in the Instruction and

Government of the Young. By JACOB ABBOTT. With Engravings.

12mo, Cloth, $1 75.

BOESÉ'S EDUCATION IN NEW YORK CITY. Public Education in the City of New

York: its History, Condition, and Statistics. An Official Report to the

Board of Education. By THOMAS BOESÉ, Clerk of the Board. With

Illustrations. 8vo, Cloth, $1 50.

BEECHER'S TRAINING OF CHILDREN. The Religious Training of Children in the

Family, the School, and the Church. By CATHARINE E. BEECHER.

12mo, Cloth, $1 75.

EDGEWORTH'S PRACTICAL EDUCATION. A Treatise on Practical Education. By

RICHARD LOVELL EDGEWORTH and MARIA EDGEWORTH. Engravings.

12mo, Cloth, $1 50.

SIR WILLIAM HAMILTON'S ESSAYS. Discussions on Philosophy and Literature,

Education and University Reform. Chiefly from the Edinburgh Review.

Corrected, Vindicated, and Enlarged, in Notes and Appendices. By Sir

WILLIAM HAMILTON, Bart. With an Introductory Essay, by Rev. ROBERT

TURNBULL, D.D. 8vo, Cloth, $3 00.

DR. OLIN'S COLLEGE ADDRESSES. College Life: its Theory and Practice. By

Rev. STEPHEN OLIN, D.D., L.L.D., late President of the Wesleyan

University. 12mo, Cloth, $1 50.

POTTER & EMERSON'S MANUAL. The School and the Schoolmaster. A Manual for

the Use of Teachers, Employers, Trustees, Inspectors, &c., &c. In Two

Parts. Part I. By Rt. Rev. ALONZO POTTER, D.D. Part II. By GEORGE B.

EMERSON, A.M., of Massachusetts. Part I. The School; its Objects,

Relations, and Uses. With a Sketch of the Education most needed in the

United States, the present State of Common Schools, the best Means of

Improving them, and the consequent Duties of Parents, Trustees,

Inspectors, &c. Part II. The proper Character, Studies, and Duties of the

Teacher, with the best Methods for the Government and Instruction for the

Common Schools, and the Principles on which School-Houses should be Built,

Arranged, Warmed, and Ventilated. Engravings. 12mo, Cloth, $1 50.

EVERETT ON PRACTICAL EDUCATION. Importance of Practical Education and

Useful Knowledge: being a Selection from the Orations and Discourses of

EDWARD EVERETT, President of Harvard University. 12mo, Cloth, $1 50.

Transcriber's Notes:

Passages in italics are indicated by _underscore_.

Additional spacing after block quotes is intentional to indicate both the

end of a quotation and the beginning of a new paragraph as presented in

the original text.

End of Project Gutenberg's The Philosophy of Teaching, by Nathaniel Sands

The Philosophy of Teaching The Teacher, The Pupil, The School · 第 3 / 3 段