The Tsar continued to press forward his social reforms at Moscow, and

his naval and military programmes. His fleet was growing on Lake Ladoga.

In its neighbourhood was the important Swedish fortress of Niantz, which

he captured in May 1703; after which he resolved to establish the town

which became Petersburg, where the Neva flows into the Gulf of Finland;

and designed the fortifications of Cronstadt, which were to render it

impregnable. The next step was to take Narva, where he had before been

foiled. The town fell on August 20, 1704; when Peter, by his personal

exertions, checked the violence of his soldiery.

Menzikoff, a man of humble origin, was now made governor of Ingria. In

June 1705, a formidable attempt of the Swedes to destroy the rapidly

rising Petersburg and Cronstadt was completely repulsed. A Swedish

victory, under Lewenhaupt, at Gemavers, in Courland, was neutralised by

the capture of Mittau. But Poland was now torn from Augustus, and

Charles's nominee, Stanislaus, was king. Denmark had been forced into

neutrality; exaggerated reports of the defeat at Gemavers had once more

stirred up the remnants of the old Strelitz. Nevertheless, Peter, before

the end of the year, was as secure as ever.

In 1706, Augustus was reduced to a formal abdication and recognition of

Stanislaus as King of Poland; and Patkul, a Livonian, Peter's ambassador

at Dresden, was subsequently delivered to Charles and put to death, to

the just wrath of Peter. In October, the Russians, under Menzikoff, won

their first pitched battle against the Swedes, a success which did not

save Patkul.

In February 1708, Charles himself was once more in Lithuania, at the

head of an army. But his advance towards Moscow was disputed at

well-selected points, and even his victory at Hollosin was a proof that

the Russians had now learned how to fight.

When Charles reached the Dnieper, he unexpectedly marched to unite with

Mazeppa in the Ukraine, instead of continuing his advance on Moscow.

Menzikoff intercepted Lewenhaupt on the march with a great convoy to

join Charles, and that general was only able to cut his way through with

5,000 of his force. Mazeppa's own movement was crushed, and he only

joined Charles as a fugitive, not an ally. Charles's desperate

operations need not be followed. It suffices to say that in May 1709, he

had opened the siege of Pultawa, by the capture of which he counted that

the road to Moscow would lie open to him.

Here the decisive battle was fought on July 12. The dogged patience with

which Peter had turned every defeat into a lesson in the art of war met

with its reward. The Swedish army was shattered; Charles, prostrated by

a wound, was himself carried into safety across the Turkish frontier.

Peter's victory was absolutely decisive and overwhelming; and what it

meant was the civilising of a territory till then barbarian. Its effects

in other European countries, including the recovery of the Polish crown

by Augustus, are pointed out in the history of Charles XII. The year

1710 witnessed the capture of a series of Swedish provinces in the

Baltic provinces; and the Swedish forces in Pomerania were neutralised.

_IV.--The Expansion of Russia_

Now the Sultan Ahmed III. declared war on Peter; not for the sake of his

guest, Charles XII., but because of Peter's successes in Azov, his new

port of Taganrog, and his ships on the Sea of Azov and the Black Sea. He

outraged international law by throwing the Russian envoy and his suite

into prison. Peter at once left his Swedish campaign to advance his

armies against Turkey.

Before leaving Moscow he announced his marriage with the Livonian

captive, Catherine, whom he had secretly made his wife in 1707. Apraksin

was sent to take the supreme command by land and sea. Cantemir, the

hospodar of Moldavia, promised support, for his own ends.

The Turkish vizier, Baltagi Mehemet, had already crossed the Danube, and

was marching up the Pruth with 100,000 men. Peter's general Sheremetof

was in danger of being completely hemmed in when Peter crossed the

Dnieper, Catherine stoutly refusing to leave the army. No help came from

Cantemir, and supplies were running short. The Tsar was too late to

prevent the passage of the Pruth by the Turks, who were now on his lines

of communication; and he found himself in a trap, without supplies, and

under the Turkish guns. When he attempted to withdraw, the Turkish force

attacked, but were brilliantly held at bay by the Russian rear-guard.

Nevertheless, the situation was desperate. It was Catherine who saved

it. At her instigation, terms--accompanied by the usual gifts--were

proposed to the vizier; and, for whatever reason, the vizier was

satisfied to conclude a peace then and there. He was probably

unconscious of the extremities to which Peter was reduced. Azov was to

be retroceded, Taganrog, and other forts, dismantled; the Tsar was not

to interfere in Poland, and Charles was to be allowed a free return to

his own dominions. The hopes of Charles were destroyed, and he was

reduced to intriguing at the Ottoman court.

Peter carried out some of the conditions of the Pruth treaty. The more

important of them he successfully evaded for some time. The treaty,

however, was confirmed six months later. But the Pruth affair was a more

serious check to the Tsar than even Narva had been, for it forced him to

renounce the dominion of the Black Sea. He turned his attention to

Pomerania, though the injuries his health had suffered drove him to take

the waters at Carlsbad.

His object was to drive the Swedes out of their German territories, and

confine them to Scandinavia; and to this end he sought alliance with

Hanover, Brandenburg, and Denmark. About this time he married his son

Alexis (born to him by his first wife) to the sister of the German

Emperor; and proceeded to ratify by formal solemnities his own espousal

to Catherine.

Charles might have saved himself by coming out of Turkey, buying the

support of Brandenburg by recognising her claim on Stettin, and

accepting the sacrifice of his own claim to Poland, which Stanislaus was

ready to make for his sake. He would not. Russians, Saxons, and Danes

were now acting in concert against the Swedes in Pomerania. A Swedish

victory over the Danes and Gadebesck and the burning of Altona were of

no real avail. The victorious general not long after was forced to

surrender with his whole army. Stettin capitulated on condition of being

transferred to Prussia. Stralsund was being besieged by Russians and

Saxons; Hanover was in possession of Bremen and Verden; and Peter was

conquering Finland, when, at last, Charles suddenly reappeared at

Stralsund, in November 1715. But the brilliant naval operation by which

Peter captured the Isle of Aland had already secured Finland.

During the last three years a new figure had risen to prominence, the

ingenious, ambitious and intriguing Baron Gortz, who was now to become

the chief minister and guide of the Swedes. Under his influence,

Charles's hostility was now turned in other directions than against

Russia, and Peter was favourably inclined towards the opening of a new

chapter in his relations with Sweden, since he had made himself master

of Ingria, Finland, Livonia, Esthonia, and Carelia. The practical

suspension of hostilities enabled Peter to start on a second European

tour, while Charles, driven at last from Weimar and Stralsund--all that

was left him south of the Baltic--was planning the invasion of Norway.

During this tour the Tsar passed three months in Holland, his old school

in the art of naval construction; and while he was there intrigues were

on foot which threatened to revolutionise Europe. Gortz had conceived

the design of allying Russia and Sweden, restoring Stanislaus in Poland,

recovering Bremen and Verden from Hanover, and finally of rejecting the

Hanoverian Elector from his newly acquired sovereignty in Great Britain

by restoring the Stuarts. Spain, now controlled by Alberoni, was to be

the third power concerned in effecting this _bouleversement_, which

involved the overthrow of the regency of Orleans in France.

The discovery of this plot, through the interception of some letters

from Gortz, led to the arrest of Gortz in Holland, and of the Swedish

ambassador, Gyllemborg, in London. Peter declined to commit himself. His

reception when he went to Paris was eminently flattering; but an attempt

to utilise it for a reunion of the Greek and Latin Churches was a

complete failure. The Gortz plot had entirely collapsed before Peter

returned to Russia.

_V.--Peter the Great_

Peter had been married in his youth to Eudoxia Feodorovna Lapoukin. With

every national prejudice, she had stood persistently in the way of his

reforms. In 1696 he had found it necessary to divorce her, and seclude

her in a convent. Alexis, the son born of this marriage in 1690,

inherited his mother's character, and fell under the influence of the

most reactionary ecclesiastics. Politically and morally the young man

was a reactionary. He was embittered, too, by his father's second

marriage; and his own marriage, in 1711, was a hideous failure. His

wife, ill-treated, deserted, and despised, died of wretchedness in 1715.

She left a son.

Peter wrote to Alexis warning him to reform, since he would sooner

transfer the succession to one worthy of it than to his own son if

unworthy. Alexis replied by renouncing all claim to the succession.

Renunciation, Peter answered, was useless. Alexis must either reform, or

give the renunciation reality by becoming a monk. Alexis promised; but

when Peter left Russia, he betook himself to his brother-in-law's court

at Vienna, and then to Naples, which at the time belonged to Austria.

Peter ordered him to return; if he did, he should not be punished; if

not, the Tsar would assuredly find means.

Alexis obeyed, returned, threw himself at his father's feet. A

reconciliation was reported. But next day Peter arraigned his son before

a council, and struck him out of the succession in favour of Catherine's

infant son Peter. Alexis was then subjected to a series of incredible

interrogations as to what he would or would not have done under

circumstances which had never arisen.

At the strange trial, prolonged over many months, the 144 judges

unanimously pronounced sentence of death. Catherine herself is said by

Peter to have pleaded for the stepson, whose accession would certainly

have meant her own destruction. Nevertheless, the unhappy prince was

executed. That Peter slew him with his own hand, and that Catherine

poisoned him, are both fables. The real source of the tragedy is to be

found in the monks who perverted the mind of the prince.

This same year, 1718, witnessed the greatest benefits to Peter's

subjects--in general improvements, in the establishment and perfecting

of manufactures, in the construction of canals, and in the development

of commerce. An extensive commerce was established with China through

Siberia, and with Persia through Astrakan. The new city of Petersburg

replaced Archangel as the seat of maritime intercourse with Europe.

Peter was now the arbiter of Northern Europe. In May 1724, he had

Catherine crowned and anointed as empress. But he was suffering from a

mental disease, and of this he died, in Catherine's arms, in the

following January, without having definitely nominated a successor.

Whether or not it was his intention, it was upon his wife Catherine that

the throne devolved.

* * * * *

W.H. PRESCOTT

The Reign of Ferdinand and Isabella

William Hickling Prescott was born at Salem, Massachusetts, on

May 4, 1796. His first great historical work, "The History of

the Reign of Ferdinand and Isabella," published in 1838, was

compiled under circumstances of extraordinary difficulty.

During most of the time of its composition the author was

deprived of sight, and was dependent on having all documents

read to him. Before it was completed he recovered the use of

his eyes, and was able to correct and verify. Nevertheless,

the changes required were few. The "Conquest of Mexico" and

"Conquest of Peru" (see _ante_) followed at intervals of five

and four years, and ten years later the uncompleted "Philip

II." He died in New York on January 28, 1859. The subjects of

this work, Ferdinand and Isabella, were the monarchs who

united the Spanish kingdoms into one nation, ended the Moorish

dominion in Europe, and annexed the New World to Spain, which

during the ensuing century threatened to dominate the states

of Christendom.

_I.--Castile and Aragon_

After the great Saracen invasion, at the beginning of the eighth

century, Spain was broken up into a number of small but independent

states. At the close of the fifteenth century, these were blended into

one great nation. Before this, the numbers had been reduced to

four--Castile, Aragon, Navarre, and the Moorish kingdom of Granada.

The civil feuds of Castile in the fourteenth century were as fatal to

the nobility as were the English Wars of the Roses. At the close, the

power of the commons was at its zenith. In the long reign of John II.,

the king abandoned the government to the control of favourites. The

constable, Alvaro de Luna, sought to appropriate taxing and legislative

powers to the crown. Representation in the cortes was withdrawn from all

but eighteen privileged cities. Politically disastrous, the reign was

conspicuous for John's encouragement of literature, the general

intellectual movement, and the birth of Isabella, three years before

John's death.

The immediate heir to the throne was Isabella's elder half-brother

Henry. Her mother was the Princess of Portugal, so that on both sides

she was descended from John of Gaunt, the father of our Lancastrian

line. Both her childhood and that of Ferdinand of Aragon, a year her

junior, were passed amidst tumultuous scenes of civil war. Henry,

good-natured, incompetent, and debauched, yielded himself to favourites,

hence he was more than once almost rejected from his throne. Old King

John II. of Aragon was similarly engaged in a long civil war, mainly

owing to his tyrannous treatment of his eldest son, Carlos.

But by 1468 Isabella and Ferdinand were respectively recognised as the

heirs of Castile and Aragon. In spite of her brother, Isabella made

contract of marriage with the heir of Aragon, the instrument securing

her own sovereign rights in Castile, though Henry thereupon nominated

another successor in her place. The marriage was effected under romantic

conditions in October 1469, one circumstance being that the bull of

dispensation permitting the union of cousins within the forbidden

degrees was a forgery, though the fact was unknown at the time to

Isabella. The reason of the forgery was the hostility of the then pope;

a dispensation was afterwards obtained from Sixtus IV. The death of

Henry, in December 1474, placed Isabella and Ferdinand on the throne of

Castile.

_II.--Overthrow of the Moorish Dominion_

Isabella's claim to Castile rested on her recognition by the Cortes; the

rival claimant was a daughter of the deceased king, or at any rate, of

his wife, a Portuguese princess. Alfonso of Portugal supported his niece

Joanna's claim. In March 1476 Ferdinand won the decisive victory of

Toro; but the war of the succession was not definitely terminated by

treaty till 1479, some months after Ferdinand had succeeded John on the

throne of Aragon.

Isabella was already engaged in reorganising the administration of

Castile; first, in respect of justice, and codification of the law;

secondly, by depressing the nobles. A sort of military police, known as

the _hermandad_, was established. These reforms were carried out with

excellent effect; instead of birth, merit became the primary

qualification for honourable offices. Papal usurpations on

ecclesiastical rights were resisted, trade was regulated, and the

standard of coinage restored. The whole result was to strengthen the

crown in a consolidated constitution.

Restrained by her natural benevolence and magnanimity, urged forward by

her strong piety and the influence of the Dominican Torquemada, Isabella

assented to the introduction of the Inquisition--aimed primarily at the

Jews--with its corollary of the _Auto da fé_, of which the actual

meaning is "Act of Faith." Probably 10,220 persons were burnt at the

stake during the eighteen years of Torquemada's ministry.

Now, however, we come to the great war for the ejection of the Moorish

rule in southern Spain. The Saracen power of Granada was magnificent;

the population was industrious, sober, and had far exceeded the

Christian powers in culture, in research, and in scientific and

philosophical inquiry.

So soon as Ferdinand and Isabella had established their government in

their joint dominion, they turned to the project of destroying the

Saracen power and conquering its territory. But the attack came from

Muley Abul Hacen, the ruler of Granada, in 1481. Zahara, on the

frontier, was captured and its population carried into slavery. A

Spanish force replied by surprising Alhama. The Moors besieged it in

force; it was relieved, but the siege was renewed. In an unsuccessful

attack on Loja, Ferdinand displayed extreme coolness and courage. A

palace intrigue led to the expulsion from Granada of Abdul Hacen, in

favour of his son, Abu Abdallah, or Boabdil. The war continued with

numerous picturesque episodes. A rout of the Spaniards in the Axarquia

was followed by the capture of Boabdil in a rout of the Moors; he was

ransomed, accepting an ignominious treaty, while the war was maintained

against Abdul Hacen.

In the summer of 1487, Malaja fell, after a siege in which signal

heroism was displayed by the Moorish defenders. Since they had refused

the first offers, they now had to surrender at discretion. The entire

population, male and female, were made slaves. The capture of Baza, in

December, after a long and stubborn resistance, was followed by the

surrender of Almeria and the whole province appertaining to it.

It was not till 1491 that Granada itself was besieged; at the close of

the year it surrendered, on liberal terms. The treaty promised the Moors

liberty to exercise their own religion, customs, and laws, as subjects

of the Spanish monarchy. The Mohammedan power in Western Europe was

extinguished.

Already Christopher Columbus had been unsuccessfully seeking support for

his great enterprise. At last, in 1492, Isabella was won over. In

August, the expedition sailed--a few months after the cruel edict for

the expulsion of the Jews. In the spring of 1493 came news of his

discovery. In May the bull of Alexander VI. divided the New World and

all new lands between Spain and Portugal.

_III.--The Italian Wars_

In the foreign policy, the relations with Europe, which now becomes

prominent, Ferdinand is the moving figure, as Isabella had been within

Spain. In Spain, Portugal, France, and England, the monarchy had now

dominated the old feudalism. Consolidated states had emerged. Italy was

a congeries of principalities and republics. In 1494 Charles VIII. of

France crossed the Alps to assert his title to Naples, where a branch of

the royal family of Aragon ruled. His successor raised up against him

the League of Venice, of which Ferdinand was a member. Charles withdrew,

leaving a viceroy, in 1495. Ferdinand forthwith invaded Calabria.

The Spanish commander was Gonsalvo de Cordova; who, after a reverse in

his first conflict, for which he was not responsible, never lost a

battle. He had learnt his art in the Moorish war, and the French were

demoralised by his novel tactics. In a year he had earned the title of

"The Great Captain." Calabria submitted in the summer of 1496. The

French being expelled from Naples, a truce was signed early in 1498,

which ripened into a definitive treaty.

On the death of Cardinal Mendoza, for twenty years the monarchs' chief

minister, his place was taken by Ximenes, whose character presented a

rare combination of talent and virtue; who proceeded to energetic and

much-needed reforms in church discipline.

Not with the same approbation can we view the zeal with which he devoted

himself to the extermination of heresy. The conversion of the Moors to

Christianity under the régime of the virtuous Archbishop of Granada was

not rapid enough. Ximenes, in 1500, began with great success a

propaganda fortified by liberal presents. Next he made a holocaust of

Arabian MSS. The alarm and excitement caused by measures in clear

violation of treaty produced insurrection; which was calmed down, but

was followed by the virtually compulsory conversion of some fifty

thousand Moors.

This stirred to revolt the Moors of the Alpuxarras hill-country; crushed

with no little difficulty, but great severity, the insurrection broke

out anew on the west of Granada. This time the struggle was savage. When

it was ended the rebels were allowed the alternative of baptism or

exile.

Columbus had returned to the New World in 1493 with great powers; but

administrative skill was not his strong point, and the first batch of

colonists were without discipline. He returned and went out again, this

time with a number of convicts. Matters became worse. A very incompetent

special commissioner, Bobadilla, was sent with extraordinary powers to

set matters right, and he sent Columbus home in chains, to the

indignation of the king and queen. The management of affairs was then

entrusted to Ovando, Columbus following later. It must be observed that

the economic results of the great discovery were not immediately

remarkable; but the moral effect on Europe at large was incalculable.

On succeeding to the French throne, Louis XII. was prompt to revive the

French claims in Italy (1498); but he agreed with Ferdinand on a

partition of the kingdom of Naples, a remarkable project of robbery. The

Great Captain was despatched to Sicily, and was soon engaged in

conquering Calabria. It was not long, however, before France and Aragon

were quarrelling over the division of the spoil. In July 1502 war was

declared between them in Italy. The war was varied by set combats in the

lists between champions of the opposed nations.

In 1503 a treaty was negotiated by Ferdinand's son-in-law, the Archduke

Philip. Gonsalvo, however, not recognising instructions received from

Philip, gave battle to the French at Cerignola, and won a brilliant

victory. A few days earlier another victory had been won by a second

column; and Gonsalvo marched on Naples, which welcomed him. The two

French fortresses commanding it were reduced. Since Ferdinand refused to

ratify Philip's treaty, a French force entered Roussillon; but retired

on Ferdinand's approach. The practical effect of the invasion was a

demonstration of the new unity of the Spanish kingdom.

In Italy, Louis threw fresh energy into the war; and Gonsalvo found his

own forces greatly out-numbered. In the late autumn there was a sharp

but indecisive contest at the Garigliano Bridge. Gonsalvo held to his

position, despite the destitution of his troops, until he received

reinforcements. Then, on December 28, he suddenly and unexpectedly

crossed the river; the French retired rapidly, gallantly covered by the

rear-guard, hotly attacked by the Spanish advance guard. The retreat

being checked at a bridge, the Spanish rear was enabled to come up, and

the French were driven in route. Gaeta surrendered on January 4; no

further resistance was offered. South Italy was in the hands of

Gonsalvo.

_IV.--After Isabella_

Throughout 1503 and 1504 Queen Isabella's strength was failing. In

November 1504 she died, leaving the succession to the Castilian crown to

her daughter Joanna, and naming Ferdinand regent. Magnanimity,

unselfishness, openness, piety had been her most marked moral traits;

justice, loyalty, practical good sense her political characteristics--a

most rare and virtuous lady.

The World's Greatest Books — Volume 12 — Modern History · 第 20 / 23 段