Of course, it should read,--

“Let twattling [twaddling] Fame cheate others’ rest,

I am no dish for Rumor’s feast.”

Mr. Halliwell comes to our assistance thus: “Page 244, line 21, [22 it

should be,] _I um_,--a printer’s error for _I am_.” _Dignus vindice

nodus!_ Five lines above, we have “whole” for “who’ll,” and four lines

below, “helmeth” for “whelmeth”; but Mr. Halliwell vouchsafes no note.

In the “Fawn” we read, “Wise _neads_ use few words,” and the editor says

in a note, “a misprint for _heads_”! Kind Mr. Halliwell!

Having given a few examples of our “Editor’s” corrections, we proceed to

quote a passage or two which, it is to be presumed, he thought perfectly

clear.

“A man can skarce put on a tuckt-up cap,

A button’d frizado sute, skarce eate good meate,

_Anchoves_, _caviare_, but hee’s satyred

And term’d phantasticall. By the muddy spawne

Of slymie neughtes, when troth, phantasticknesse

That which the naturall sophysters tearme

_Phantusia incomplexa_--is a function

Even of the bright immortal part of man.

It is the common passe, the sacred dore,

Unto the prive chamber of the soule;

That bar’d, nought passeth past the baser court

Of outward scence by it th’inamorate

Most lively thinkes he sees the absent beauties

Of his lov’d mistres.” (Vol. I. p. 241.)

My study windows · 第 42 / 77 题