TRACT I.

1. You ask of me then for what reason it was that Pythagoras abstained

from eating of flesh. I for my part do much admire in what humor, with

what soul or reason, the first man with his mouth touched slaughter,

and reached to his lips the flesh of a dead animal, and having set

before people courses of ghastly corpses and ghosts, could give

those parts the names of meat and victuals, that but a little before

lowed, cried, moved, and saw; how his sight could endure the blood of

slaughtered, flayed, and mangled bodies; how his smell could bear their

scent; and how the very nastiness happened not to offend the taste,

while it chewed the sores of others, and participated of the saps and

juices of deadly wounds.

Crept the raw hides, and with a bellowing sound

Roared the dead limbs; the burning entrails groaned.[1]

This indeed is but a fiction and fancy; but the fare itself is truly

monstrous and prodigious,—that a man should have a stomach to creatures

while they yet bellow, and that he should be giving directions which of

things yet alive and speaking is fittest to make food of, and ordering

the several manners of the seasoning and dressing them and serving them

up to tables. You ought rather, in my opinion, to have enquired who

first began this practice, than who of late times left it off.

2. And truly, as for those people who first ventured upon eating of

flesh, it is very probable that the whole reason of their so doing was

scarcity and want of other food; for it is not likely that their living

together in lawless and extravagant lusts, or their growing wanton and

capricious through the excessive variety of provisions then among them,

brought them to such unsociable pleasures as these, against Nature.

Yea, had they at this instant but their sense and voice restored to

them, I am persuaded they would express themselves to this purpose.

“Oh! happy you, and highly favored of the Gods, who now live! Into what

an age of the world are you fallen, who share and enjoy among you a

plentiful portion of good things! What abundance of things spring up

for your use! What fruitful vineyards you enjoy! What wealth you gather

from the fields! What delicacies from trees and plants, which you may

gather! You may glut and fill yourselves without being polluted. As

for us, we fell upon the most dismal and affrighting part of time,

in which we were exposed by our first production to manifold and

inextricable wants and necessities. As yet the thickened air concealed

the heaven from our view, and the stars were as yet confused with a

disorderly huddle of fire and moisture and violent fluxions of winds.

As yet the sun was not fixed to an unwandering and certain course,

so as to distinguish morning and evening, nor did he bring back the

seasons in order crowned with wreaths from the fruitful harvest. The

land was also spoiled by the inundations of disorderly rivers; and a

great part of it was deformed with sloughs, and utterly wild by reason

of deep quagmires, unfertile forests, and woods. There was then no

production of tame fruits, nor any instruments of art or invention

of wit. And hunger gave no time, nor did seed-time then stay for the

yearly season. What wonder is it if we made use of the flesh of beasts

contrary to Nature, when mud was eaten and the bark of wood, and when

it was thought a happy thing to find either a sprouting grass or a

root of any plant! But when they had by chance tasted of or eaten an

acorn, they danced for very joy about some oak or esculus, calling it

by the names of life-giver, mother, and nourisher. And this was the

only festival that those times were acquainted with; upon all other

occasions, all things were full of anguish and dismal sadness. But

whence is it that a certain ravenousness and frenzy drives you in these

happy days to pollute yourselves with blood, since you have such an

abundance of things necessary for your subsistence? Why do you belie

the earth as unable to maintain you? Why do you profane the lawgiver

Ceres, and shame the mild and gentle Bacchus, as not furnishing you

with sufficiency? Are you not ashamed to mix tame fruits with blood

and slaughter? You are indeed wont to call serpents, leopards, and

lions savage creatures; but yet yourselves are defiled with blood, and

come nothing behind them in cruelty. What they kill is their ordinary

nourishment, but what you kill is your better fare.”

3. For we eat not lions and wolves by way of revenge; but we let those

go, and catch the harmless and tame sort, and such as have neither

stings nor teeth to bite with, and slay them; which, so may Jove help

us, Nature seems to us to have produced for their beauty and comeliness

only. [2][Just as if one seeing the river Nilus overflowing its banks,

and thereby filling the whole country with genial and fertile moisture,

should not at all admire that secret power in it that produces plants

and plenteousness of most sweet and useful fruits, but beholding

somewhere a crocodile swimming in it, or an asp crawling along, or

mice (savage and filthy creatures), should presently affirm these to

be the occasion of all that is amiss, or of any want or defect that

may happen. Or as if indeed one contemplating this land or ground, how

full it is of tame fruits, and how heavy with ears of corn, should

afterwards espy somewhere in these same cornfields an ear of darnel or

a wild vetch, and thereupon neglect to reap and gather in the corn,

and fall a complaining of these. Such another thing it would be, if

one—hearing the harangue of some advocate at some bar or pleading,

swelling and enlarging and hastening towards the relief of some

impending danger, or else, by Jupiter, in the impeaching and charging

of certain audacious villanies or indictments, flowing and rolling

along, and that not in a simple and poor strain, but with many sorts

of passions all at once, or rather indeed with all sorts, in one and

the same manner, into the many and various and differing minds of

either hearers or judges that he is either to turn and change, or else,

by Jupiter, to soften, appease, and quiet—should overlook all this

business, and never consider or reckon upon the labor or struggle he

had undergone, but pick up certain loose expressions, which the rapid

motion of the discourse had carried along with it, as by the current of

its stream, and so had slipped and escaped the rest of the oration, and

hereupon undervalue the orator.]

4. But we are nothing put out of countenance, either by the beauteous

gayety of the colors, or by the charmingness of the musical voices,

or by the rare sagacity of the intellects, or by the cleanliness and

neatness of diet, or by the rare discretion and prudence of these

poor unfortunate animals; but for the sake of some little mouthful of

flesh, we deprive a soul of the sun and light, and of that proportion

of life and time it had been born into the world to enjoy. And then we

fancy that the voices it utters and screams forth to us are nothing

else but certain inarticulate sounds and noises, and not the several

deprecations, entreaties, and pleadings of each of them, as it were

saying thus to us: “I deprecate not thy necessity (if such there be),

but thy wantonness. Kill me for thy feeding, but do not take me off

for thy better feeding.” O horrible cruelty! It is truly an affecting

sight to see the very table of rich people laid before them, who keep

them cooks and caterers to furnish them with dead corpses for their

daily fare; but it is yet more affecting to see it taken away, for the

mammocks left are more than that which was eaten. These therefore were

slain to no purpose. Others there are, who are so sparing of what is

set before them that they will not suffer it to be cut or sliced; thus

abstaining from them when dead, while they would not spare them when

alive.

5. Well then, we understand that that sort of men are used to say, that

in eating of flesh they follow the conduct and direction of Nature. But

that it is not natural to mankind to feed on flesh, we first of all

demonstrate from the very shape and figure of the body. For a human

body no ways resembles those that were born for ravenousness; it hath

no hawk’s bill, no sharp talon, no roughness of teeth, no such strength

of stomach or heat of digestion, as can be sufficient to convert or

alter such heavy and fleshy fare. But even from hence, that is, from

the smoothness of the tongue, and the slowness of the stomach to

digest, Nature seems to disclaim all pretence to fleshy victuals. But

if you will contend that yourself was born to an inclination to such

food as you have now a mind to eat, do you then yourself kill what you

would eat. But do it yourself, without the help of a chopping-knife,

mallet, or axe,—as wolves, bears, and lions do, who kill and eat at

once. Rend an ox with thy teeth, worry a hog with thy mouth, tear a

lamb or a hare in pieces, and fall on and eat it alive as they do.

But if thou hadst rather stay until what thou eatest is become dead,

and if thou art loath to force a soul out of its body, why then dost

thou against Nature eat an animate thing? Nay, there is nobody that

is willing to eat even a lifeless and a dead thing as it is; but they

boil it, and roast it, and alter it by fire and medicines, as it were,

changing and quenching the slaughtered gore with thousands of sweet

sauces, that the palate being thereby deceived may admit of such

uncouth fare. It was indeed a witty expression of a Lacedaemonian, who,

having purchased a small fish in a certain inn, delivered it to his

landlord to be dressed; and as he demanded cheese, and vinegar, and oil

to make sauce, he replied, if I had had those, I would not have bought

the fish. But we are grown so wanton in our bloody luxury, that we have

bestowed upon flesh the name of meat (ὄψον), and then require another

seasoning (ὄψον), to this same flesh, mixing oil, wine, honey, pickle,

and vinegar, with Syrian and Arabian spices, as though we really meant

to embalm it after its disease. Indeed when things are dissolved and

made thus tender and soft, and are as it were turned into a sort

of a carrionly corruption, it must needs be a great difficulty for

concoction to master them, and when it hath mastered them, they must

needs cause grievous oppressions and qualmy indigestions.

6. Diogenes ventured once to eat a raw pourcontrel, that he might

disuse himself from meat dressed by fire; and as several priests and

other people stood round him, he wrapped his head in his cassock, and

so putting the fish to his mouth, he thus said unto them: It is for

your sake, sirs, that I undergo this danger, and run this risk. A noble

and gallant risk, by Jupiter! For far otherwise than as Pelopidas

ventured his life for the liberty of the Thebans, and Harmodius and

Aristogiton for that of the Athenians, did this philosopher encounter

with a raw pourcontrel, to the end he might make human life more

brutish. Moreover, these same flesh-eatings not only are preternatural

to men’s bodies, but also by clogging and cloying them, they render

their very minds and intellects gross. For it is well known to most,

that wine and much flesh-eating make the body indeed strong and lusty,

but the mind weak and feeble. And that I may not offend the wrestlers,

I will make use of examples out of my own country. The Athenians are

wont to call us Boeotians gross, senseless, and stupid fellows, for

no other reason but our over-much eating; and Pindar calls us also

hogs, for the same reason. Menander the comedian calls us “fellows

with long jaws.” It is observed also that, according to the saying of

Heraclitus, “the wisest soul is like a dry light.”[3] Earthen jars, if

you strike them, will sound; but if they be full, they perceive not

the strokes that are given them. Copper vessels also that are thin

communicate the sound round about them, unless some one stop and dull

the ambient stroke with his fingers. Moreover, the eye, when seized

with an over-great plenitude of humors, grows dim and feeble for its

ordinary work. When we behold the sun through a humid air and a great

quantity of gross and indigested vapors, we see it not clear and

bright, but obscure and cloudy, and with glimmering beams. Just so in a

muddy and clogged body, that is swagged down with heavy and unnatural

nourishments; it must needs happen that the gayety and splendor of the

mind be confused and dulled, and that it ramble and roll after little

and scarce discernible objects, since it wants clearness and vigor for

higher things.

7. But to pass by these considerations, is not accustoming one’s self

to mildness and a human temper of mind an admirable thing? For who

could wrong or injure a man that is so sweetly and humanly disposed

with respect to the ills of strangers that are not of his kind? I

remember that three days ago, as I was discoursing, I made mention

of a saying of Xenocrates, and how the Athenians gave judgment upon a

certain person who had flayed a living ram. For my part I cannot think

him a worse criminal that torments a poor creature while living, than

a man that shall take away its life and murder it. But (as it seems)

we are more sensible of what is done against custom than against

Nature. There, however, I discoursed on these matters in a more popular

style. But as for that grand and mysterious principle which (as Plato

speaks) is incredible to base minds and to such as affect only mortal

things, I as little care to move it in this discourse as a pilot doth

a ship in a storm, or a comedian his machine while the scenes are

moving; but perhaps it would not be amiss, by way of introduction and

preface, to proclaim certain verses of Empedocles.... For in these,

by way of allegory, he hints at men’s souls, as that they are tied to

mortal bodies, to be punished for murders, eating of flesh and of one

another, although this doctrine seems much ancienter than his time.

For the fables that are storied and related about the discerption of

Bacchus, and the attempts of the Titans upon him, and of their tasting

of his slain body, and of their several punishments and fulminations

afterwards, are but a representation of the regeneration. For what

in us is unreasonable, disorderly, and boisterous, being not divine

but demoniac, the ancients termed Titans, that is _tormented_ and

_punished_ (from τίνω)....

Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 5 (of 5) · 第 42 / 183 题