A GENERAL SONG OF PRAISE TO ALMIGHTY GOD

How shall I sing that Majesty

Which angels do admire?

Let dust in dust and silence lie:

Sing, sing, ye heavenly choir.

Thousands of thousands stand around

Thy throne, O God, most high:

Ten thousand times ten thousand sound

Thy praise; but who am I?

Thy brightness unto them appears,

Whilst I Thy footsteps trace:

A sound of God comes to my ears,

But they behold Thy face:

They sing because Thou art their Sun,

Lord, send a beam on me:

For where heaven is but once begun,

There Hallelujahs be.

Enlighten with faith’s light my heart,

Inflame it with love’s fire,

Then shall I sing and bear a part

With that celestial choir.

I shall, I fear, be dark and cold

With all my fire and light,

Yet when Thou dost accept their gold,

Lord, treasure up my mite.

How good art Thou whose goodness is

Our parent, nurse, and guide:

Whose streams do water Paradise

And all the earth beside!

Thine upper and Thy nether springs

Make both Thy worlds to thrive:

Under Thy warm and sheltering wings

Thou keep’st two broods alive.

Thy arm of might, most Mighty King,

Both rocks and hearts doth break;

My God, Thou canst do everything

But what would shew Thee weak.

Thou canst not cross Thyself, or be

Less than Thyself, or poor;

But whatsoever pleaseth Thee,

That canst Thou do, and more.

Who would not fear Thy searching eye,

Witness to all that’s true?

Dark hell and deep hypocrisy

Lie plain before its view.

Motions and thoughts, before they grow,

Thy knowledge doth espy;

What unborn ages are to do

Is done before Thine eye.

Thy wisdom which both makes and mends

We ever much admire;

Creation all our wit transcends,

Redemption rises higher.

Thy wisdom guides strayed sinners home,

’Twill make the dead world rise,

And bring those prisoners to their doom,

Its paths are mysteries.

Shepherd’s poems were called ‘Penitential Cries,’ and were published

with Mason’s Songs of Praise in 1693. His best-known hymn begins

Alas, my God, that we should be

Such strangers to each other!

O that as friends we might agree,

And walk, and talk together!

Most of his hymns have vigour and freshness, but there is generally

something which hinders them from becoming hymns of the first class.

The following verses are taken from a hymn entitled, ‘Lamenting the

Loss of First Love,’ and were probably known to Cowper—

O that my soul was now as fair

As it has sometimes been,

Devoid of that distracting care

Without, and guilt within.

There was a time when I could tread

No circle but of love;

That joyous morning now is fled,

How heavily I move!

Unhappy soul, that thou should’st force

Thy Saviour to depart,

When He was pleasèd with so coarse

A lodging in thy heart!

How sweetly I enjoyed my God!

With how divine a frame!

I thought, on every plant I trod

I read my Saviour’s name.

O might those days return again,

How welcome they should be!

Shall my petition be in vain,

Since grace is ever free?

Lord of my soul, return, return,

To chase away this night;

Let not Thine anger ever burn;

God once was my delight.

Other hymn-writers of this period are almost or entirely unknown to

modern hymnals. One or two names may, however, be mentioned. Matthew

Henry wrote a number of ‘family hymns’; Benjamin Keach (1640-1704) not

only wrote hymns by the hundred, but published a defence of

congregational singing under the title—_The Breach repaired in God’s

Worship_.

William Barton may be taken as a fair example of the poorer

hymn-writers of the time. There is little to choose between the best

and the worst of his _Six Centuries of Hymns_. The work was dedicated

to Sir Matthew Hale, who had spoken a good word for the hymns to the

Mayor and Aldermen of Leicester, in which town Barton had been

minister of St. Martin’s Church. Led by Dr. Julian’s statement that

these hymns ‘deserve more attention from compilers than they have

hitherto received,’ I have searched them diligently, but in vain. I am

most impressed that such dull productions could ever have been

popular.

There is, indeed, something very pathetic in the author’s evident

satisfaction with his work and in his son’s pride in his father’s

‘pious and laborious undertaking,’ which he was led to attempt,

‘finding that the ancient usage of our speech in Sternhold and

Hopkins’s translation was become obsoletely contemptuous to many

people of this age.’ This filial editor believed that the hymn-book

‘would sufficiently manifest its excellency in the perusal,’ a belief

which the extensive circulation of its many editions may be taken to

justify. Barton’s first book, his version of the Psalms, was published

in 1644, and the last edition was printed in 1768. During a great part

of that period it was probably the standard psalter of the

Nonconformist congregations. His hymns are usually brief, and he was

careful to use familiar metres, having a special weakness for

‘delicate and expeditious tunes.’ His psalms and hymns owed their long

life to the poverty of rivals, but one cannot be surprised that Enoch

Watts, in urging his brother ‘to oblige the world by showing it your

hymns in print,’ should say that ‘honest Barton chimes us asleep.’

The Hymn-Book of the Modern Church: Brief studies of hymns and hymn-writers · 第 34 / 101 题