When the _Trojans_ were consulting what was to be done with the

_Wooden-Horse_, and some were for lodging it within the Walls; _Laocoon_

appears against this Opinion at the Head of a numerous Party, harangues

with a great deal of Sense, and Resolution, and examines the _Machine_ with

his Lance. In fine, He advised so well, and went so far in the Discovery of

the Stratagem; that if the _Trojans_ had not been ungovernable, and as it

were stupified by Fate and Folly, he had saved the Town.[235]

_Trojaque nunc stares Priamique arx alta maneres_.

This _Laocoon_ was _Neptunes_ Priest, and either Son to _Priam_, or Brother

to _Anchises_, who was of the Royal Family.[236] The next we meet with is

_Pantheus Apollo's_ Priest. He is call'd _Pantheus Otriades_, which is an

argument his Father was well known. His acquaintance with _Æneas_ to whose

House he was carrying his little Grandson, argues him to be a Person of

Condition.[237] _Pantheus_ after a short relation of the Posture of

Affairs, joyns _Æneas_'s little Handful of Men, charges in with him when

the Town was seiz'd, and fired, and at last dies Handsomly in the

Action.[238]

The next is _Anius_ King of _Delos_, Prince and _Priest_ in one Person.

_Rex Anius, rex idem hominum Phoebique Sacerdos._[239]

When _Æneas_ was outed at _Troy_, and in quest of a new Country, he came to

an Anchor at _Delos_; _Anius_ meets him in a Religious Habit, receives him

civilly, and obliges him with his _Oracle_.[240] In the Book now Mention'd

we have another of _Apollo's_ Priests, his name is _Helenus_, Son of

_Priam_ and King of _Chaonia_. He entertains _Æneas_ with a great deal of

Friendship, and Magnificence, gives him many material Directions, and makes

him a rich Present at parting. To this Prince if you Please we may joyn a

Princess of the same Profession; and that is _Rhea Silvia_ Daughter to

_Numitor_ King of _Alba_, and Mother to _Romulus_, and _Remus_. This Lady

_Virgil_ calls----_regina Sacerdos_ a Royal Priestess.[241] Farther. When

_Æneas_ made a Visit upon Business to the _shades Below_, He had for his

Guide, the famous _Sibylla Cumæa_, who Belong'd to _Apollo_.[242] When he

came thither amongst the rest of his Acquantance he saw _Polybætes_ a

Priest of _Ceres_. This _Polybætes_ is mention'd with the three Sons of

_Antenor_, with _Glaucus_, and _Thersilochus_, who Commanded in Cheif in

the _Trojan Auxiliaries_: So that you may know his Quality by his Company.

When _Æneas_ had passed on farther, he saw _Orpheus_ in _Elysium_: The Poet

calls him the _Thracian_ Priest. There needs not be much said of _Orpheus_;

He is famous for his skill in Musick, Poetry, and Religious

Ceremonies,[243] He was one of the Hero's of Antiquity, and a principal

Adventurer in the Expedition for the _Golden-Fleece_.

In the Seventh _Æneid_ the Poet gives in a List of the Princes, and General

Officers who came into the Assistance of _Turnus_; Amongst the rest he

tells you,

_Quin & Marrubia venit de gente Sacerdos,

Archippi regis missu fortissimus Umbro._

This _Priest_ he commends both for his Courage and his skill in Physick,

Natural Magick, and Phlosophy. He understood the Virtue of _Plants_, and

could lay Passions and Poysons asleep. His death was extreamly regretted by

his Country, who made a Pompous and Solemn Mourning for him.

_Te nemus Angitiæ, vitrea te Fucinus unda,

Te liquidi flevere lacus._[244]

The _Potitij_, and the _Pinarij_ Mention'd _Æneid 8._[245] were as _Livy_

observes, chosen out of the first Quality of the Country, and had the

_Priesthood_ hereditary to their Family. To go on, _Æmonides_, and

_Chloreus_ make a glittering Figure in the _Feild_, and are very remarkable

for the Curiosity of their Armour, and Habit. _Æmonides_'s _Finery_ is

passed over in general.

_Totus collucens veste atque insignibus armis._[246]

But the Equipage of _Chloreus_ is flourish'd out at Length, and as I

remember admired by _Macrobius_ as one of the Master peices of _Virgil_ in

Description. In short; He is all Gold, Purple, Scarlet, and

Embroydery;[247] and as rich as Nature, Art, and Rhetorick can make him. To

these I might add _Rhamnes_, _Asylas_, and _Tolumnius_, who were all

Persons of Condition, and had Considerable Posts in the Army.[248]

It may be these last were not strictly _Priests_. Their Function was rather

_Prophetick_. They interpreted the Resolutions of the Gods, by the voice of

Birds, the Inspection of Sacrifices, and their Observations of Thunder.

This made their Character counted Sacred, and their Relation to the Deity

particular. And therefore the _Romans_ ranged them in the _Order_ of the

_Priests_.[249]

Thus we see the admired _Homer_, and _Virgil_, always treat the _Priests_

fairly, and describe them in Circumstances of Credit: If 'tis said that the

Instances I have given are mostly in Names of _Fiction_, and in Persons who

had no Being, unless in the Poets fancy. I answer, I am not concern'd in

the History of the Relation. Whether the Muster is true or false, 'tis all

one to my purpose. This is certain, had the _Priests_ been People of such

slender Consideration as our _Stage Poets_ endeavour to make them; they

must have appear'd in a different Figure; or rather have been left out as

too little for that sort of _Poem_. But _Homer_ and _Virgil_ had other

Sentiments of Matters: They were governed by the Reason of Things, and the

common usage of the World. They knew the _Priesthood_ a very reputable

Employment, and always esteem'd as such. To have used the _Priests_ ill,

They must have call'd their own Discretion in question: They must have run

into impropriety, and fallen foul upon Custom, Manners, and Religion. Now

'twas not their way to play the Knave and the Fool together: They had more

Sense than to do a silly Thing, only for the Satisfaction of doing an ill

one.

I shall now go on to enquire what the Greek _Tragedians_ will afford us

upon the present Subject. There are but two _Plays_ in _Æschylus_ where the

_Ministers_ of the Gods are represented. The one is in his _Eumenides_, and

here _Apollo_'s _Priestess_ only opens the _Play_ and appears no more. The

other is in his _Seige_ of _Thebes_. In this Tragedy the _Prophet

Amphiaraus_ is one of the Seven Commanders against the _Town_. He has the

Character of a Modest, Brave Officer, and of one who rather affected to be

great in Action, than Noise.

In _Sophocle_'s _Oedipus Tyrannus_, _Jupiter's Priest_ has a short part. He

appears at the Head of an _Address_, and delivers the Harangue by the

King's Order. _Oedipus_ in his Passion treats _Tiresias_ ruggedly;[250]

_Tiresias_ replies with Spirit and Freedom; and plainly tell him he was

none of his _Servant_ but _Apollo_'s.

[Greek: Ou gar ti soi zô doulos alla loxia][251]

And here we may observe that all _Oedipus_ his reproaches relate to

_Tiresias_'s person, there is no such Thing as a general Imputation upon

his Function: But the _English Oedipus_ makes the _Priesthood_ an

Imposturous Profession;[252] and rails at the whole _Order_. In the next

Tragedy, _Creon_ charges _Tiresias_ with subornation; and that he intended

to make a Penny of his Prince. The _Priest_ holds up his Character, speaks

to the ill Usage with an Air of Gravity, calls the King _Son_, and

foretells him his Misfortune.[253]

To go on to _Euripides_, for _Sophocles_ has nothing more. This Poet in his

_Phænissæ_ brings in _Tiresias_ with a very unacceptable report from the

_Oracle_. He tells _Creon_ that either his Son must die, or the City be

lost. _Creon_ keeps himself within Temper, and gives no ill Language. And

even when _Moenecius_ had kill'd himself, he neither complains of the Gods,

nor reproaches the _Prophet_.[254]

In his _Bacchæ_, _Tiresias_ is honourably used by _Cadmus_; And _Pentheus_

who threatned him, is afterwards punish'd for his Impiety.[255] In another

_Play_ _Apollo_'s _Priestess_ comes in upon a creditable account, and is

respectfully treated.[256] _Iphigenia_ _Agamemnon_'s Daughter is made

_Priestess_ to _Diana_; and her Father thought himself happy in her

Employment.[257] These are all the _Priests_ I remember represented in

_Euripides_. To conclude the antient _Tragedians_ together: _Seneca_ seems

to follow the Conduct of _Euripides_, and secures _Tiresias_ from being

outraged. _Oedipus_ carries it smoothly with him and only desires him to

out with the Oracle, and declare the Guilty Person. This _Tiresias_

excuses, and afterwards the Heat of the expostulation falls upon

_Creon_.[258] _Calchas_ if not strictly a _Priest_, was an _Augur_, and had

a Religious Relation. Upon this account _Agamemnon_ calls him _interpres

Deorum_; The Reporter of Fate, and the God's _Nuntio_; And gives him an

honourable Character.[259]

This Author is done; I shall therefore pass on to the _Comedians_. And

here, _Aristophanes_ is so declared an Atheist, that I think him not worth

the citing. Besides, he has but little upon the Argument: And where he does

engage it, the _Priests_ have every jot as good Quarter as the Gods.[260]

As for _Terence_, he neither represents any _Priests_, nor so much as

mentions them. _Chrysalus_ in _Plautus_ describes _Theotimus Diana's

Priest_, as a Person of Quality, and Figure.[261] In his _Rudens_ we have a

_Priestess_ upon the _Stage_, which is the only Instance in this

_Poet_.[262] She entertains the two Women who were wrecked, and is

commended for her hospitable Temper. The Procurer _Labrax_ swaggers that he

will force the Temple, and begins the Attack. _Demades_ a Gentleman, is

surprized at his Insolence, and threatens him with Revenge. The report of

so bold an attempt made him cry out. _Quis homo est tanta Confidentia; qui

sacerdotem andeat Violare?_[263] It seems in those Days 'twas very infamous

to affront a _Holy Character_, and break in upon the _Guards_ of Religion!

Thus we see how the Antient Poets behaved themselves in the Argument.

_Priests_ seldom appear in their _Plays_. And when they come 'tis Business

of Credit that brings them. They are treated like Persons of Condition.

They Act up to their Relation; neither sneak, nor prevaricate, nor do any

thing unbecoming their Office.

And now a word or two of the _Moderns_.

The famous _Corneille_ and _Moliere_, bring no _Priests_ of any kind upon

the _Stage_. The former leaves out _Tiresias_ in his _Oedipus_: Tho' this

Omission balks his Thought, and maims the _Fable_. What therefore but the

regard to Religion could keep him from the use of this Liberty? As I am

informed the same Reservedness is practis'd in _Spain_, and _Italy_: And

that there is no Theatre in _Europe_ excepting the _English_, that

entertains the _Audience_ with _Priests_.

This is certainly the right method, and best secures the Outworks of Piety.

The Holy Function is much too Solemn to be play'd with. Christianity is for

no Fooling, neither the _Place_, the _Occasion_ nor the _Actors_ are fit

for such a Representation. To bring the _Church_ into the _Playhouse_, is

the way to bring the _Playhouse_ into the _Church_. 'Tis apt to turn

Religion into _Romance_, and make unthinking People conclude that all

Serious Matters are nothing but _Farce_, _Fiction_, and _Design_. 'Tis true

the _Tragedies_ at _Athens_ were a sort of _Homilies_, and design'd for the

Instruction of the People: To this purpose they are all Clean, Solemn, and

Sententious. _Plautus_ likewise informs us that the _Comedians_ used to

teach the People Morality.[264] The case standing thus 'tis less suprizing

to find the _Priests_ sometimes Appear. The Play had grave Argument, and

Pagan Indulgence, to plead in its behalf. But our _Poets_ steer by an other

_Compass_. Their Aim is to _destroy_ Religion, their _Preaching_ is against

_Sermons_; and their Business, but Diversion at the best. In short, Let the

Character be never so well managed no Christian _Priest_ (especially,)

ought to come upon the _Stage_. For where the Business is an Abuse, and the

place a Profanation; the demureness of the Manner, is but a poor excuse.

Monsieur _Racine_ is an Exception to what I have observ'd in _France_. In

his _Athalia_, _Joida_ the _High-Priest_ has a large part. But then the

Poet does him Justice in his Station; he makes him Honest and Brave, and

gives him a shining Character throughout. _Mathan_ is another _Priest_ in

the same Tragedy. He turns Renegado, and revolts from God to _Baal_. He is

a very ill Man but makes a considerable Appearance, and is one of the Top

of _Athaliahs_ Faction. And as for the _Blemishes_ of his Life, they all

stick upon his own Honour, and reach no farther than his Person: In fine

the _Play_ is a very Religious Poem; 'Tis upon the Matter all _Sermon_ and

_Anthem_. And if it were not designed for the _Theatre_, I have nothing to

object.

Let us now just look over our own Country-men till King _Charles_ the

Second. _Shakespear_ takes the Freedom to represent the _Clergy_ in several

of his _Plays_: But for the most part he holds up the _Function_, and makes

them neither Act, nor Suffer any thing unhandsom. In one Play or two He is

much bolder with the _Order_.[265] Sr. _Hugh Evans_ a _Priest_ is too

Comical and Secular in his Humour. However he understands his Post, and

converses with the Freedom of a Gentleman. I grant in _Loves Labour lost_

the _Curate_ plays the Fool egregiously; And so does the _Poet_ too, for

the whole _Play_ is a very silly one. In the History of Sr. _John

Old-Castle_, Sr. _John, Parson_ of _Wrotham_ Swears, Games, Wenches, Pads,

Tilts, and Drinks: This is extreamly bad, and like the Author of the

_Relapse_ &c. Only with this difference; _Shakespears_, Sr. _John_ has some

Advantage in his Character. He appears Loyal, and Stout; He brings in Sr.

_John Acton_, and other Rebels Prisoners. He is rewarded by the King, and

the Judge uses him Civilly and with Respect. In short He is represented

Lewd, but not Little; And the Disgrace falls rather on the Person, then the

Office. But the _Relapsers_ business, is to sink the Notion, and Murther

the Character, and make the Function despicable: So that upon the whole,

_Shakespear_ is by much the gentiler Enemy.

Towards the End of the _Silent Woman_, _Ben Johnson_ brings in a

_Clergy-man_, and a _Civilian_ in their _Habits_. But then he premises a

handsom Excuse, acquaints the _Audience_, that the _Persons_ are but

borrowed, and throws in a _Salvo_ for the Honour of either profession. In

the Third _Act_, we have another _Clergy-man_; He is abused by _Cutberd_,

and a little by _Morose_. But his Lady checks him for the ill Breeding of

the Usage. In his _Magnetick Lady_, _Tale of a Tub_, and _Sad Sheapherd_,

there are _Priests_ which manage but untowardly. But these _Plays_ were his

_last Works_, which Mr. _Dryden_ calls _his Dotages_.[266] This Author has

no more _Priests_, and therefore we'll take Leave.

_Beaumont_ and _Fletcher_ in the _Faithful Shepheardess_, _The False one_,

_A Wife for a Month_, and the _Knight of Malta_, give, us both _Priests_

and _Bishops_, part Heathen and part Christian: But all of them save their

Reputation and make a creditable Appearance. The _Priests_ in the _Scornful

Lady_, and _Spanish Curate_ are ill used. The first is made a Fool, and the

other a Knave. Indeed they seem to be brought in on purpose to make sport,

and disserve Religion. And so much for _Beaumont_ and _Fletcher_.

Thus we see the English _Stage_ has always been out of Order, but never to

the Degree 'tis at present.

I shall now take Leave of the _Poets_, and touch a little upon History and

Argument.

And here I shall briefly shew the Right the _Clergy_ have to Regard, and

fair Usage, upon these Three following Accounts.

I. _Because of their Relation to the Deity._

II. _Because of the Importance of their Office._

III. _They have prescription for their Privilege. Their function has been

in Possession of Esteem in all Ages, and Countries._

I. _Upon the account of their Relation to the Deity._

The Holy _Order_ is appropriated to the Divine Worship: And a _Priest_ has

the peculiar Honour to _Belong_ to nothing less then God Almighty. Now the

Credit of the _Service_ always rises in proportion to the Quality and

Greatness of the Master. And for this Reason 'tis more Honourable to serve

a Prince, than a private Person. To apply this. Christian _Priests_ are the

Principal Ministers of Gods Kingdom. They Represent his Person, Publish his

Laws, Pass his Pardons, and Preside in his Worship. To expose a _Priest_

much more to burlesque his Function, is an Affront to the Diety. All

indignities done to Ambassadors, are interpreted upon their Masters, and

reveng'd as such. To outrage the _Ministers_ of Religion, is in effect to

deny the Being, or Providence of God; And to treat the _Bible_ like a

_Romance_. As much as to say the Stories of an other World are nothing but

a little _Priest-craft_, and therefore I am resolv'd to Lash the

Profession. But to droll upon the Institutions of God; To make his

Ministers cheap, and his Authority contemptible; To do this is little less

than open defyance. Tis a sort of Challenge to awaken his Vengeance, to

exert his Omnipotence; and do Right to his Honour. If the Profession of a

Courtier was unfashionable, a Princes Commission thought a Scandal, and the

_Magistracy_ laught at for their Business; the Monarch had need look to

himself in time; He may conclude his Person is despis'd, his Authority but

a Jest, and the People ready either to change their Master, or set up for

themselves. Government and Religion, no less than _Trade_ Subsist upon

Reputation. 'Tis true God can't be Deposed, neither does his Happiness

depend upon Homage; But since he does not Govern by Omnipotence, since he

leaves Men to their Liberty, Acknowledgment must sink, and Obedience

decline, in proportion to the Lessenings of Authority. How provoking an

Indignity of this kind must be, is easy to imagine.

II. The Functions and Authorities of Religion have a great Influence on

_Society_. The Interest of this Life lies very much in the Belief of

another. So that if our Hopes were bounded with _Sight_, and _Sense_, if

_Eternity_ was out of the Case, General Advantage, and Publick Reason, and

Secular Policy, would oblige us to be just to the _Priesthood_. For

_Priests_, and Religion always stand and fall together; Now Religion is the

Basis of Government, and Man is a wretched Companion without it. When

Conscience takes its Leave, Good Faith, and Good Nature goes with it.

_Atheism_ is all Self, Mean and Mercenary. The _Atheist_ has no

_Hereafter_, and therefore will be sure to make the most of this World.

Interest, and Pleasure, are the Gods he Worships, and to these he'll

Sacrifice every Thing else.

III. The _Priest-hood_ ought to be fairly treated, because it has

prescription for this Privilege. This is so evident a Truth, that there is

hardly any Age or Country, but affords sufficient Proof. A just Discourse

upon this Subject would be a large Book, but I shall just skim it over and

pass on. and

_1st._ For the Jews. _Josephus_ tells us the Line of _Aaron_ made some of

the best Pedigrees, and that the _Priests_ were reckon'd among the

Principal Nobility.[267]

By the Old _Testament_ we are inform'd that the _High-Priest_ was the

Second Person in the Kingdom.[268] The Body of that _Order_ had Civil

Jurisdiction. And the _Priests_ continued Part of the Magistracy in the

time of our Saviour. _Jehoiada_ the _High-Priest_ was thought an Alliance

big enough for the Royal Family.[269] He Married the Kings Daughter; His

Interest and Authority was so great that he broke the Usurpation under

_Athalia_; and was at the Head of the Restauration. And lastly the

_Assamonean_ Race were both Kings and Priests.[270]

To Proceed. The _Ægyptian_ Monarchy was one of the most antient and best

polish'd upon Record. Here Arts and Sciences, the Improvment of Reason, and

the Splendor of Life had its first Rise. Hither 'twas that _Plato_ and most

of the Celebrated Philosophers travel'd for their Learning. Now in this

Kingdom the _Priests_ made no vulgar Figure. These with the Military Men

were the Body of the Nobility, and Gentry. Besides the Business of

Religion, the _Priests_ were the Publick _Annalists_ and kept the Records

of _History_, and _Government_. They were many of them bred in Courts,

formed the Education of their Princes, and assisted at their Councils.[271]

When _Joseph_ was Viceroy of _Ægypt_, and in all the height of his Pomp,

and Power, the King Married him to the Daughter of _Potipherah Priest_ of

_On_. The Text says _Pharaoh gave him her to Wife_.[272] This shows the

Match was deliberate Choice, and Royal Favour, no stooping of Quality, or

Condescensions of Love, on _Joseph_'s Side.

To pass on. The _Persian Magi_, and the _Druids_, of _Gaul_ were of a

Religious Profession, and consign'd to the Service of the Gods. Now all

these were at the upper End of the Government, and had a great share of

Regard and Authority.[273] The Body of the _Indians_ as _Diodorus Siculus_

reports is divided into Seven parts. The first is the _Clan_ of the

_Bramines_, the _Priests_, and Philosophers of that Country. 'This Division

is the least in Number, but the first in Degree. Their Privileges are

extraordinary. They are exempted from Taxes, and Live Independent of

Authority. They are called to the Sacrifices, and take care of Funerals;

They are look'd on as the Favourites of the Gods, and thought skillful in

the Doctrins of an other Life: And upon these accounts are largely

consider'd in Presents, and Acknowledgment. The _Priestesses_ of _Argos_

were so Considerable, that _Time_ is dated from them, and they stand for a

Reign in _Chronology_.[274] The Brave _Romans_ are commended by _Polybius_

for their Devotion to the Gods; Indeed they gave great Proof of their being

in earnest; For when thier Cheif Magistrates, their Consuls themselves, met

any of the _Vestals_, they held down their _Fasces_, and stoop'd their

_Sword_ and _Mace_ to Religion.[275]

A Short View of the Immorality, and Profaneness of the English Stage Together with the Sense of Antiquity on this Argument · 第 6 / 15 段