And I have watched the morning when

Athwart the vapors dun

The Easter sun

Streamed with one broad track of splendor.

Perhaps I love it because so many of my ancestors were soldiers

or sailors or ship builders in northern Europe or in America.

Perhaps it is because of the story itself and the way it ends.

Perhaps it is because of the appropriate variety in the rhythms

of the different sections, so expressive of the occasion in each

case. Perhaps I cannot tell why.

Anyhow, I like the bold defiance in the Challenge of Thor,

the swing of rollers at sea in King Olaf’s Return, the creepy

repetition in The Wraith of Odin, the hurry and the lingering

in Gudrun, the jolly swing in Thangbrand the Priest. I might go

on in this way through the entire series, mentioning the clash

and rattle in the fight at sea, and the beautiful dignity of the

musical voice that speaks to Astrid the Abbess, but I want to

mention other reasons why I like the Saga.

I like it because it is full of such vivid pictures. When I read

I am right there sailing and fighting and feasting with the king

and his men.

I like some of the people I meet, and admire almost all of them.

Queen Sigrid is a _queen_! Old Iron-Beard is splendid. Raud the

Strong is an “Old Roman,” game to the end! Thorberg Skafting is

a true craftsman. Einar Tamberskelver is a brilliant hero, and

Kolbiorn as faithful a friend as ever lived and died.

But I think some parts of these poems are as perfect poetry as

I ever read. Is there anywhere in four lines a more beautiful

description of moonlight than this?

On King Olaf’s bridal night

Shines the moon with tender light,

And across the chamber streams

Its tide of dreams.

Where are there better pictures in a few musical lines than these?

Short of stature, large of limb,

Burly face and russet beard,

All the women stared at him

When in Iceland he appeared.

“Look,” they said,

With nodding head,

“There goes Thangbrand, Olaf’s priest.”

When they landed from the fleet,

How they roared through Drontheim’s street,

Boisterous as the gale!

How they laughed and stamped and pounded

Till the tavern roof resounded

And the host looked on astounded

As they drank the ale!

In the convent of Drontheim,

Alone in her chamber,

Knelt Astrid the Abbess,

At midnight, adoring,

Beseeching, entreating,

The Virgin and Mother.

Then, think of this as a description of ships putting out to sea:

On the gray sea sands

King Olaf stands,

Northward and seaward

He points with his hands.

With eddy and whirl

The sea tides curl,

Washing the sandals

Of Sigvald the Earl.

The mariners shout,

The ships swing about,

The yards are all hoisted,

The sails flutter out.

The war horns are played,

The anchors are weighed,

Like moths in the distance

The sails flit and fade.

The sea is like lead,

The harbor lies dead,

As a corse on the seashore

Whose spirit has fled!

On that fatal day,

The histories say,

Seventy vessels

Sailed out of the bay.

This simple rhythm is capable of great variety of

expression--meditation, weird movement, hurry and bustle,

solitude, sadness, despair. It is wonderful.

There are other reasons why I like the Olaf Saga, but these are

all I care to tell.

Having read this to the children, not only to illustrate the kind

of a chapter required, but to inspire them to do their enthusiastic

best, wait for results. Meanwhile, push ahead with the design.

=Eighth, Complete the Design=

We have now reached the point where individuality may reveal

itself in form and color. We want our booklets to be works of fine

art--_each one_ a work of fine art, reflecting the thought and

feeling and exhibiting the skill of the artist-craftsman who produced

it.

The key to success is to be found in Hegel’s definition: “A work

of fine art is the free and adequate embodiment of the Idea, in

a form peculiarly appropriate to the Idea itself.” By Idea Hegel

means what we mean when we say: “What is your _idea_ in doing that?”

Idea includes thought, purpose, reason, aim, intention, motive,

principle, and the like. The _idea_ is the soul of the thing, the

spirit of which the outward act, form, thing, is the manifestation or

embodiment. A concrete illustration will make this thought clearer.

Here is my Longfellow booklet. It must reflect in every detail _my_

thought and feeling about _Longfellow_.

I find in the poet a note of sadness. “Hiawatha” has it--he sails

into the sunset; the Indian era has come to an end; it will never

return. Miles Standish lost his Priscilla. The Village Blacksmith’s

wife was in heaven. Turning rapidly the pages of my Longfellow I

read titles and first and last lines, all striking the same note:

“I wish that I was dead”; “It is not always May”; “The day is cold

and dark and dreary”; “There in the twilight cold and gray, lifeless

and beautiful he lay”; “The twilight is sad and cloudy”; “And like

a dream, in the Gulf Stream sinking, vanish all away”; “There is

no flock, however watched and tended, but one dead lamb is there”;

“Black shadows fall from the lindens tall”; “My Lost Youth”; “In the

Churchyard at Cambridge”; “Weariness”--O, there are so many of them!

The Old Clock on the Stairs ticks in every poem! Even my King Olaf

failed.

The young grew old and gray,

But never, by night or by day,

In his kingdom of Norroway,

Was King Olaf seen again!

And Evangeline? Pitifully sad. Here, then, is a part of the _idea_ to

be embodied in my booklet. I have already expressed in words another

part of it, namely, my preference for the Olaf Saga. Moreover,

Longfellow seems to me a man of the kindliest, most benevolent, sweet

spirit, cultivated and lovable. How can I embody all this, my Idea,

in the make-up of my booklet?

Three opportunities present themselves--first, color; second,

decoration; third, technique.

_Color_--In all ages, in all the arts making use of color--painting,

decoration, costume, jewelry and (in language) literature--color has

been used not only for its own sake but for its symbolism. Colors

have taken on meaning. “They are manifest signs to those who think,”

said Mohammed. Here is a concise statement of the almost universal

symbolism of color:

MEANING OF THE PRINCIPAL COLORS AND THEIR

APPROPRIATE USES

RED, _the symbol of_

Blood

Love--Passion

Valor, Patriotism

Christ

ORANGE, _the symbol of_

Fire

Marriage--the Home

Hospitality

Benevolence

Earthly Wisdom

Holy Spirit

YELLOW, _the symbol of_

Sun--Gold

Supreme Wisdom

Divinity

GREEN, _the symbol of_

Vegetation

Life--Immortality

Fruitfulness

Prosperity

Hope

BLUE, _the symbol of_

Truth

Constancy

Justice

God the Father

PURPLE, _the symbol of_

Royalty

Love of Truth

Loyalty

Martyrdom

Mourning

WHITE, _the symbol of_

Purity

Perfection

Innocence

GRAY and BROWN, _the symbol of_

Barrenness

Renunciation

Unfruitfulness

Penitence

BLACK, _the symbol of_

Night--Despair--Evil--Sin--Death

Glancing over this table with my Idea in mind, I conclude that

orange best expresses my feeling about Longfellow, especially

when I remember that orange, dulled, becomes brown, symbol of the

“renunciation” and “unfruitfulness” so often dominant in his poems.

The cover of my booklet shall be brown, and whatever I place upon

it shall be in orange and black. This will not only express my idea

but be a pleasing combination of color--another important element.

Longfellow’s character could not be suggested in violent and

brilliant contrasts of loud colors!

_Decoration_--Inasmuch as Longfellow means to me, first, the Olaf

Saga, my decoration shall be Celtic. There seems to be a peculiar

appropriateness in using the Celtic interlaced ornament, for its

intricate convolutions, weaves, and knots are said to symbolize the

mysterious ways of Providence and his unity of purpose in everything.

Longfellow held that faith, although he saw the darker side of the

shield.

_Technique_--Longfellow was a gentleman and a scholar. He respected

all the fine conventionalities of life, he upheld the best traditions

in thought and speech. What a contrast between his art and that of

Walt Whitman! For a Whitman booklet I might use a paper strong and

rough in texture, and print the title in green ink! My cover design

might be as unconventional as a granite boulder, and my technique

as bold as the signature of John Hancock! But for Longfellow my

technique must be restrained, temperate, orderly, conventional,

refined.

The cover is the “advance agent.” It should win at sight; it should

arouse interest in the contents of the book, and suggest its

character; it should fittingly protect and recommend the contents, as

a frame protects a picture and enhances all its good qualities.

_Arrangement._--The problem now is the arrangement of the material

for the cover. However it is arranged, the page must be (1) legible

and (2) pleasing to the eye.

1. Legibility. This means that only easily recognizable letters be

used for the title and author’s name. “When in doubt use Roman” is

good advice. The style of lettering chosen should echo in some way

the style of the text within. If the booklet is to be written freely,

in ordinary hand, a free Roman letter, such as Mr. Hall has used in

Plate X, is appropriate for the title-page. If the hand is to be more

formal, such, for example, as that shown in Plate XI, the title-page

should be drawn in such a style as that exhibited in the heading of

the plate. In short, what is said about ornamental initials and their

relation to the text, on page 36, applies in a general way to the

title-page. The title-page may, however, be a little further removed

from the text, a little more formal in character than the initial,

because it is not so directly associated with the text. Then, too,

the title-page is like the outside front door. It first meets the

stranger. The introduction demands certain formalities. Once within

the house greater freedom may be granted.

Legibility means also freedom from entangling alliances. Text should

be text with ample space for itself, and ornament should be ornament

within its own field. The two should never quarrel, should never be

snarled up together, should never wrestle with each other or compete

for first place.

2. Pleasing Appearance. Pleasing appearance in a cover design means

four things: (_a_) The design as a whole must appeal first to the

eye. (_b_) Among the parts of this whole the title should stand first

in importance. (_c_) All the parts should have an orderly relation to

each other and to the whole in size and position. (_d_) This orderly

relation involves balance.

Balance means the distribution of attractions with reference to

some center. Lines, spots, areas, contrasts, colors all constitute

attractions for the eye. These must be so distributed that they

balance on the vertical axis of the page, and upon a point in that

axis slightly above its geometric center.

[Illustration: PLATE II.

Three types of cover designs. In the upper row badly arranged; in the

lower row well arranged.]

Plate II shows the covers of six school reports. The bad ones are in

the upper row.

The first does not present itself as a whole. The seal has the first

word. The cover below is better in design.

The second has unfortunately four styles of type in three lines (!)

where one style would have been enough. The type mass is too low on

the page. The cover below it is better.

The third repeats the defect of the first in its seal. Moreover, it

is unbalanced. The seal is on the vertical axis, but the type mass is

not. If the upper mass is at the left of the central axis, the lower

must be at the right. The cover below this is better.

[Illustration: PLATE III.

Booklet making · 第 12 / 21 题