LETTER XXII.

The Lap-dog.--The Dame Blanche.--The Beauty in a Gallery.--The

Lingère.--Madame Frederic.--Fête de Longchamps.--Parisian

Fashions.--Holy Concerts.--Pretty Women.--Empire of Fashion.--Reign

of Beauty.--The Fashionable Lady.

May, 1836.

I have just had yours of the 4th of April, and have seen two of Miss

Kitty’s, very acid. Doctor ---- let one of them fall in the Seine from

the Pont Neuf, and it made lemonade to St. Cloud. Poor Miss Kitty! I

wish she had such a husband as her mother, who, instead of going to

carnivals, and masquerades, and receptions, and such places, and giving

uneasiness to his wife, stays at home and looks cross all the evening,

by the fire-side.--I walked out this morning in one of these domestic

fits, and kicked a lady’s lap-dog in the Tuileries, and was called to

account for it by a pair of mustachios like the horns of a centipede,

and I got off only by making an apology to the lady and the

puppy--(smiling to her and patting the dog a little) which I would not

have done under the administration of James Madison.

This happened just by the statue of Lucretia, who used to stay at home

also in the same way of an evening in spinning; it would have been,

perhaps, better for both of us to have mixed a little more in the

amusements of the town. The fact is, it puzzles the best of us to know

how to behave ourselves. One may fall, like the Roman lady into

difficulties at home, and another into temptations abroad. But alas,

poor Kitty!--Beware of telling her what I am going to relate to you. You

know what a thing jealousy is. Doctor ---- has fallen in love with a

French woman. To be sure, she is one of the most glorious beauties of

Paris, admired by the very first nobility--by the Duke of Orleans, by

the Duke of Nemours, and by the Duke of I don’t know what else; and if

the truth was known, I believe the king himself is fond of her. If you

had only seen her last night at her harp!--a fine woman is dangerous in

any shape whatever; but when she adds music to her charms--one

surrenders at discretion.

If you had heard her wild notes, as they thrilled upon the wires, and as

her fluttering voice softened and expired upon the listening ear, you

would not yourself have blamed a little infidelity towards one’s wife,

especially all the way to Paris. I hate to keep you in pain, so I will

tell you at once her name.--What makes it a little more unhappy perhaps

is, that she is a lady of rather a doubtful reputation; and belongs at

present to the “Opera Comique:” In fine, if you will absolutely know, it

was the “_Dame Blanche_.”

And now that I am in the chapter of accidents, I may as well tell you

that your old acquaintance, D. D--, on Saturday night, was found

dead--(say nothing of this to his sister, she will be so afflicted)--he

was found dead drunk in the _Place du Carrousel_; and on Monday he got

up at six in the morning, and went deliberately into a tippling-shop in

the neighbourhood, and ran himself through the body--(being mad at his

father for not sending him money)--with a pint of rum.

I have now prepared you for a story of a much more serious import--a

story which concerns myself. I would not tell it to you but in obedience

to my invariable rule of concealing nothing from you. What a place this

Paris is! No virtue is under shelter from its temptations. Solomon had a

great deal more wisdom than I can pretend to, and he was seduced away by

foreigners, who, I dare say, were not half so tempting as these French.

I was looking out a few days ago to see what kind of weather it

was;--there was not a cloud in the firmament; but there was a very

beautiful woman standing in a gallery almost opposite; so I left off

looking at the heavens just to look at this woman a little, never

supposing any harm would come of it. But nothing is so dangerous as this

cross-the-street kind of acquaintance. The silent conversation of looks,

so much more expressive than words; the mysterious conjectures about

what each other’s thoughts may be, and above all, the obstacle of the

intervening space--you know what amorous things obstacles are.

If it had not been the wall with the crack in it at Babylon, I dare say

Pyramus and Thisbe would not have cared for each other a French

sou.--She kept looking and looking (I mean the woman in the gallery) and

now and then I looked back at her. And if I have been looking into the

looking-glass, more than usual, and if the tailor has just brought me

home an entire new suit, which I could not well afford, it is all owing

to her. I wish you could have seen the elegant creature this morning, as

I did, at her toilette; as she stood like our first mother combing down

to her ankles (the prettiest pair but one you ever saw) her long hair,

which hung around her as a misty cloud about the full moon.

The little shoe soon embraced her foot and the garter her knee; the maid

laced up her corsets, giving graceful folds to her _jupe_, gracility to

her waist, and relief to her tournure; and incased her fair form in a

frock, “soft as the dove’s down and as white;”--her glossy tresses

having already received their fittest harmony from her nimble and

tapering fingers.

And now she sat at her mirror, and perused her elegant features; she

looked joyful, then sad, then cruel, then tender, and brought out each

sentiment into its most eloquent and dangerous expression; she studied a

frown and then put on the magic of a smile.--The fine rhetoric of the

bosom came next--the rock upon which taste so often is wrecked. Here she

meditated and pondered much and inquired of the Graces, how far she

might adventure--“how much to the curious eye disclose, how much to

fancy leave.”

I walked with her yesterday, amidst the elegant life of the Tuileries,

at her return from an airing in the Bois de Boulogne. Unless you see a

woman at all her fashionable hours, as well as in all her attitudes and

passions, you know nothing of her beauty. She wore a little airy hat, _à

la Duchesse de la Vallière_, the bird of Paradise waving over her

stately brow;

“Suave a guisa va di un bel pavone,

Diritta sopra se, come una grua;”

with cock-feathers in weeping willow upon the crown.--I went in the

evening to the ball with her--_parole d’honneur_; in her dress of satin,

citron colour, trimmed in _gauze volant_, and a tunique of the same,

with wreaths of roses; and in her hair a garland of forget-me-not, with

gems assorted by Beaudran, and beautiful as the stars upon the azure

firmament. In her morning walk, if she condescends ever to walk in the

mornings, her mantle is of deep colours. She wears in half dress, a

_chapeau bibi_; in negligé, her tresses are parted under a _capote_, and

her thin gauze handkerchief zig-zag, is narrow by an inch;

---- “’neath which you see

Two crisp young ivory apples come and go,

Like waves that on the shore beat tenderly,

When a sweet air is ruffling to and fro.”

I send you a copy of her washerwoman’s list for the last week. I have

seen one of the Queen Elizabeth’s somewhere, which began thus:

Elizabeth, by the grace of God, Queen of England, Ireland and France,

Defender of the Faith. _Two petticoats, &c._ This Frenchwoman’s is

without preface as follows: One frock, _à l’abri galant_; one ditto,

_souris effrayé_; two ditto, _rassurées_; one jupon _inexorable_; two

ditto, _implacables_; with other articles too tedious to enumerate.

Apropos. The department of the wash-tub is important, and I may as well

give you here its statistics. There is the _Bourgeoise_, who

superintends, and under her in order, the _savoneuse_, the _empeseuse_

and _refineuse_. A plain washerwoman has forty-two sous per day, and a

starcher, clear starcher and ironer, three francs. There is scarcely

any thing in Paris more neat and elegant than a _Lingère_. Each branch

is brought, by a division of labour, to a nice perfection, which you

will see in no other country; but, to find a single person, who can put

a shirt through all its varieties, is nearly impossible. A gentleman’s

account stands thus: Une chemise, _trois sous_; une veste, _trois sous_;

une pantalon de drap, _six sous_; un collet, _un sou_; pair de bas,

_deux sous_. And the washerwoman, when she brings you in your linen,

will come in her court dress, and counting your shirts, she will inquire

after your health, and as she retires she will have the “honour to

salute you.” Madame Frederic is one of the notabilities of Paris, and no

one who has a proper respect for clean linen ever speaks to her but with

his hat in his hand; she has a _reputation Européenne_, but she refuses

to wash any thing under a ministerial shirt--and not even that, if it be

worn twice.

And now I will proceed to tell you who this elegant woman is, in whom,

by this time, you must have taken some interest. She is a Parisian by

birth and education, a married woman, and the greatest coquette and most

capricious creature of all Paris; and yet all Paris--alas, more than

all Paris, does nothing but run after her. As for me, I declare with

Cicero, “_malle me errare cum illa, quam aliis recte sapere_.”

She has a brother too, as much admired by the ladies as she by the

gentlemen, and is so exquisite in taste and dress, that many doubt

whether he himself may not be of the softer gender. I wish I had time to

describe to you his wardrobe also. His _petite redingote_ of blue, and

his white _pantalons_ in contrast with his black vest and azure cravat,

for the morning promenade; his graceful _Polonaise_ trousers black, and

vest white, for the field sports, and his----

---- But he is a proud and insolent fellow, and I hate him because he

always has an eye upon his sister, and unless you ruin yourself

altogether, in expenses for new coats, he won’t speak to you. In fine,

to keep you no longer in suspense about this elegant couple ---- they are

called “The Fashions.” Enough of parables; to-morrow I will treat you to

matters of fact.

To-morrow, May 8th.

This old fool, Paris, has turned out again upon the Boulevards, three

days of this week, as thick as a _Mardi gras_; it is called the _fête de

Longchamps_, and the object is to determine the fashions for the coming

season. The most important decision of this year seems to be the entire

suppression of “gigot sleeves.” Only think; they were last year as wide

as the British Channel, and now they are to be all at once razed to the

quick. The public, however, does not submit quietly to the curtailment.

Nothing else indeed but mutton sleeves and the President’s message is

thought fit for conversation, or discussion in the newspapers, this

month past. It is found to be exceedingly difficult to legislate for the

head and shoulders, and lower parts at the same time; what is a benefit

to one section being a prejudice to the other. The waist especially is

indignant; it has been straightened enough and squeezed enough in all

conscience ever since it was first invented. It has remonstrated; and

petition after petition has been sent in, signed by all the neighbouring

states, threatening to nullify the union, unless these restrictions are

taken off. However, by relieving a little the flatness and nakedness of

the arm with a row or two of _point d’Angleterre_, it is supposed a

compromise may be effected. Indeed I have already seen several pairs of

these sleeves venturing abroad, and two yesterday amidst the _bravas_

of the Tuileries. But what a figure is a woman, shrunk into those narrow

circumstances above, and so prominent beneath! she seems scarcely of the

same species. She is Horace’s _mulier formosa superné_ reversed.

Another decree of the Longchamps is to lengthen the frock still more at

the tail; though longer already than cleanliness or mercy to many a

reluctant pair of ankles should have permitted. Ankles are said to be

very beautiful in Paris, and they resisted with all their might this

innovation the last season; they had enjoyed the privilege of being seen

for years, and it was natural they should take some steps to maintain

it; but did it avail? In this you see only another signal example of the

despotism of Fashion. Not two years ago a frock was circumcised

midleg--no one indeed looked at a lady’s legs, as a matter of curiosity,

much below the knee--and now, unless in a whirlwind or stepping into a

coach, not a “peeping ankle” is to be seen upon the whole pavé of Paris.

Alas, all you can see now-a-days is

“The feet, that from each petticoat

Like little mice creep in and out.”

Formerly, the cause of going to Longchamps was to say mass; now it is a

mutton-sleeve. This Longchamps was once a Convent, and was founded by

St. Louis’s sister, Isabelle de France, who after her death performed in

this place (a pretty good number for a woman) forty miracles. The place

therefore became very celebrated; pilgrims visited it by thousands, and

the sick were carried there to be cured, and princesses shut themselves

up in it from the temptations of the world. But these nuns were very

pretty, and the rakes of Paris went thither on pilgrimage also; amongst

the rest went Henry the Fourth to court Mademoiselle Catherine de

Vérdun.

In the course of time every one heard certain holy concerts spoken of,

that were given there on Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays of the Holy

week, (the days now celebrated.) On which occasions the church was

illuminated, embalmed with incense, and the little nuns sang so sweetly,

that many pious people thought their songs not of this earth, but hymns

that came directly from the celestial choirs: and the crowds that

frequented Longchamps was immense.

Not the inhabitants of Paris only came, but of London and other foreign

cities, striving to rival each other in the richness of their dresses,

and the magnificence of their equipages. Their emulation went so far at

last, that the very wheels of the chariots were often gilt, and the

shoes of the horses were also of the precious metals; and the coachmen

and footmen more gold than gold (κρυσω κρυσοτερα.) But again libertinism

broke into the sacred cloisters, and the concerts were suppressed;

finally the Revolution came, and the convent was demolished; not a stone

was left to testify the miracles of Isabelle de France. But the

multitude still continues its annual pilgrimage to Longchamps.

In the present fêtes there is scarcely any thing which recals the

sumptuousness of ancient times. Coaches indeed are varnished, stirrups

are burnished, and lacqueys have a new livery; and here and there an

English lord, or an American Colonel blazes out with chariots,

postilions, and mounted gens d’armes. The French aristocracy has been so

unvarnished by the Revolution, that twenty thousand a year has got very

little chance of being exceedingly magnificent.

The procession is an uninterrupted train of vehicles of all sorts in

motion the whole length of the Boulevards; and up through the Champs

Elysées to the Bois de Boulogne, a distance of about four miles, and

having arrived at a certain spot, the cavalcade wheels about and

returns in the same manner; the one side of the way being used for going

and the other for coming. The chief concern of the day is, the

exhibition of pretty women in open barouches, clad in the splendours and

novelties of the season. Mounted beaux, too, on steeds richly

caparisoned are exceedingly in favour.

The decrees of Longchamps, like Cæsar’s, go forth upon the whole earth;

and it is the only tribunal that can claim upon the earth this extensive

jurisdiction. A revolution has passed, like a hurricane, over its very

throne, and left its authority undisturbed; and there is no reason to

believe that this supreme and universal power will ever pass away.

Causes and effects both co-operate to perpetuate its existence. In other

countries, men and women, follow fashion, and have consequently little

exercise of taste or invention; but the Parisians are by general consent

inventors; they are gay, vain and ostentatious, and from the nature of

their commerce, and from the number of strangers who are induced to

reside amongst them, they will give always to dress and fashion an

importance they can have no where else. Let us then recognise our

legitimate sovereigns, and bow graciously to their natural and

indisputable authority. Let us recognise, too, the wisdom of Providence,

which by giving a diversity of products to the earth, and of capacities

to the civilised nations, who inhabit it, has bound them by ties of

mutual necessity, to live together in peace and harmony. The savages of

our country, who have no such ties, who have but the same pursuits and

capacities, have also but one passion, the destruction of each other.

To compare the American and French modiste, is to compare the mere

manual operation, to the imaginative and intelligent exercise of the

mind. A French bonnet maker is not made, she is born; she meditates, she

invents, she conceives a hat--as much as Pindar did a lyric poem. And

when she has made you a hat, your only wonder is, whether the hat was

made for you, or you were made for the hat.

Why, in Philadelphia a hat may be worn by two faces; here it is a

constituent part of the woman it was invented for, and they cannot be

separated from each other without injury to both. Do you believe that

_Madame Palmyre_ ever makes two frocks alike? it would be the ruin of

the woman’s reputation. What kind of feelings must a lady have, coming

into an assembly, and finding another woman’s frock having the same

physiognomy as her own! I have seen more than one in a fit of hysterics

from this very occurrence. And do you believe that _Simon’s_ chapeaux

are formed upon the cold precepts of the schools, or Herbault’s _bibis_?

Do you think that _Michael’s_ shoes, or those exquisite bottines of

_Gelot_, or those kid gloves of _Boivin_ are produced without

enthusiasm? or _Batton’s_ flowers or _Cartier’s_ plumes, without

inspiration?

A modiste in America indeed!--why the same woman cuts out a frock and

makes it! The same woman who does the head-work of a bonnet, does the

stitchings! In France there is an adaptation of labour to the abilities

of the artist; and a modiste _en chef_ no more thinks of the

manipulation of a frock, than Scribe of a vaudeville, or Carème of a

dinner.

Nor does she suffer her genius to be dissipated and wasted upon

varieties even the most important. Each branch has its professor, whose

whole mind is concentrated upon this one object. Even the invention has

its specialities. One adapts colours to complexions, and another studies

the proportions of the human form, and its shapes, and the congruity of

dresses with its various sizes; how to bring out an attraction more

seductive by the sacrifice of one less potent; where to enhance a beauty

by a defect; and how to discover a charm under pretext of concealing it;

one is a kind of Minister of the Interior, another of Foreign Affairs.

In the manual operations, too, the same series is observed. One folds,

another crimples, one bastes, another rips; one spends her days in

“undoing,” another in “trying-on,” another again grows old in puckering,

and so in crisping, pranking, curling, and flouncing--all have their

several functions, and all their tasks assorted to their several

abilities.

At the fête of the Longchamps the eye is dazzled by the splendour, and

the attention is distracted by the variety. A fashion, to have vogue,

must present itself in a more “questionable shape.” A pretty woman is

therefore selected, who for a season may personate the many-coloured

goddess; she is called during her reign the “Most fashionable”--not

indeed as the king is called the “Most Christian,” for truly, she is the

most fashionable--“_la plus à la mode de Paris_.”

The Parisians have a way of getting this fashionable woman up, pretty

much as we get up a great man in the United States. A few of the

leaders of fashion, young gentlemen in their first down, having made

choice of a fit person, first direct upon her all the rays of their

admiration. She is not required to be a duchess, or to have any more

beauty or accomplishments than her neighbours, but she had better be the

wife of a rich banker. If she rides out of an afternoon to the Bois de

Boulogne, then will a dozen of these fashionables gather around her

barouche; and hats in hand, they will canter alongside; they will be

unable to contain their admiration, and they will set the multitude

gaping. Thus in the crowd one stares at the heavens, and another, till

at last the world is on the gaze; and as all see different wonders in

the skies, one a whale, another a weasel, and many phantasms and idle

visions; so in the heaven of this lady’s face, beauties are now struck

out that had remained, but for this general regard, for ever

undiscovered; beauties which herself, if possible, had never seen.

----“As learned critics view

In Homer, beauties Homer never knew.”

The same gallants pursue her to the opera, and there gather into her

box with noise and bustle and assiduities, till they have drawn the

whole house upon her, and every glass is pointed; as in the chase, where

the hare stands at bay, and the hunters have but a single aim; only that

here the danger is reversed.

So at the concert, and so at the ball, where she is engaged for twenty

sets a-head, before half up the stairs; so every where the same ardour,

the same _empressement_, the same adoration. She is gazetted too in the

newspapers, and all her particulars, jetty hair, inky eye-brows, turn-up

nose, pouting lips; every thing circumstantially described. Every one

knows her, every one loves her, and every one not wishing to pass for a

clown, without taste, swears she is adorable. She is in every one’s

mouth, she is in every one’s heart, she is ---- in a word, she is _la

femme la plus à la mode de Paris_.

Thus our fashionable lady is turned about in the vortex of dissipation

till Spring, and enjoys a flood of frothy adulation beyond the lot of

all other monarchs. The spring arrives, and then the summer; and being

fashionable, she leaves of course during the warm months for the

Waterings, or her castle in a distant province, and returns in the

Autumn: and in the Autumn she finds another “Fashionable Lady” in her

place. It is scarce to be expected that such violent admiration should

be bestowed on the same person for more than a season. She now abdicates

and sinks into obscurity, or which is more common, being unable to

endure the reverse of fortune, dies of mortification and spite.

I send you this by Mr. C----, of Philadelphia, with a single sheet of

music, a delightful air from the Puritani--an air which is graven upon

ten thousand hearts. Oh, if you had heard Rubini sing it over the coffin

of Bellini at the Invalids! The sexton wept. It stole upon the ear as if

from the spheres--mournful as the wood-pigeon’s moan:--

----“Soft as the mother’s lullaby

When babies sleep.”

Learn to sing it in your most plaintive voice. I will love you the more

for recalling one of the tenderest scenes of my absence. Good night.

The American in Paris; vol. 2 of 2 · 第 32 / 38 题