Practice self-discipline in talking. Correct any fault in yo

E-text prepared by Kevin Handy, Suzanne Lybarger, Martin Pettit, and the

Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team

(http://www.pgdp.net/)

TALKS ON TALKING

by

GRENVILLE KLEISER

Formerly Instructor in Public Speaking at Yale Divinity School,

Yale University; author of "How to Speak in Public," "How to

Develop Power and Personality in Speaking," "How to Develop

Self-Confidence in Speech and Manner," "How to Argue and Win,"

"How to Read and Declaim," "Complete Guide to Public Speaking,";

etc.

Copyright, 1916, by

Funk. & Wagnalls Company

(Printed in the United States of America)

Published, September, 1916

Copyright under the articles of the Copyright Convention of the

Pan-American Republics and the United States, August 11, 1910

CONTENTS

PAGE

THE ART OF TALKING 1

TYPES OF TALKERS 11

TALKERS AND TALKING 18

PHRASES FOR TALKERS 25

THE SPEAKING VOICE 34

HOW TO TELL A STORY 44

TALKING IN SALESMANSHIP 56

MEN AND MANNERISMS 63

HOW TO SPEAK IN PUBLIC 70

PRACTICAL HINTS FOR SPEAKERS 84

THE DRAMATIC ELEMENT IN SPEAKING 87

CONVERSATION AND PUBLIC SPEAKING 94

A TALK TO PREACHERS 100

CARE OF THE SPEAKER'S THROAT 108

DON'TS FOR PUBLIC SPEAKERS 116

DO'S FOR PUBLIC SPEAKERS 118

POINTS FOR SPEAKERS 120

THE BIBLE ON SPEECH 122

THOUGHTS ON TALKING 123

PREFACE

Good conversation implies naturalness, spontaneity, and sincerity of

utterance. It is not advisable, therefore, to lay down arbitrary rules

to govern talking, but it is believed that the suggestions offered here

will contribute to the general elevation and improvement of daily

speech.

Considering the large number of persons who are obliged to talk in

social, business, and public life, the subject of correct speech should

receive more serious consideration than is usually given to it. It is

earnestly hoped that this volume will be of practical value to those who

are desirous of developing and improving their conversational powers.

Appreciative thanks are expressed to the Editors of the _Homiletic

Review_ for permission to reprint some of the extracts.

GRENVILLE KLEISER.

NEW YORK CITY,

MAY, 1916.

Boys flying kites haul in their white-wing'd birds:

You can't do that way when you're flying words.

"Careful with fire," is good advice we know;

"Careful with words," is ten times doubly so.

Thoughts unexpress'd may sometimes fall back dead,

But God Himself can't kill them once they're said!

--_Will Carleton._

The first duty of a man is to speak; that is his chief business in

this world; and talk, which is the harmonious speech of two or

more, is by far the most accessible of pleasures. It costs nothing;

it is all profit; it completes our education; it founds and fosters

our friendships; and it is by talk alone that we learn our period

and ourselves.

--_Robert Louis Stevenson._

Vociferated logic kills me quite;

A noisy man is always in the right--

I twirl my thumbs, fall back into my chair,

Fix on the wainscot a distressful stare;

And when I hope his blunders all are out,

Reply discreetly, "To be sure--no doubt!"

--_Anon._

TALKS ON TALKING

THE ART OF TALKING

The charm of conversation chiefly depends upon the adaptability of the

participants. It is a great accomplishment to be able to enter gently

and agreeably into the moods of others, and to give way to them with

grace and readiness.

The spirit of conversation is oftentimes more important than the ideas

expressed. What we are rather than what we say has the most permanent

influence upon those around us. Hence it is that where a group of

persons are met together in conversation, it is the inner life of each

which silently though none the less surely imparts tone and character to

the occasion.

It requires vigorous self-discipline so to cultivate the feelings of

kindness and sympathy that they are always in readiness for use. These

qualities are essential to agreeable and profitable intercourse, though

comparatively few people possess them.

Burke considered manners of more importance than laws. Sidney Smith

described manners as the shadows of virtues. Dean Swift defined manners

as the art of putting at ease the people with whom we converse.

Chesterfield said manners should adorn knowledge in order to smooth its

way through the world. Emerson spoke of manners as composed of petty

sacrifices.

We all recognize that a winning manner is made up of seemingly

insignificant courtesies, and of constant little attentions. A person of

charming manner is usually free from resentments, inquisitiveness, and

moods.

Personality plays a large part in interesting conversation. Precisely

the same phraseology expressed by two different persons may make two

wholly different impressions, and all because of the difference in the

personalities of the speakers.

The daily mental life of a man indelibly impresses itself upon his face,

where it can be unmistakably read by others. What a person is, innately

and habitually, unconsciously discloses itself in voice, manner, and

bearing. The world ultimately appraises a man at his true value.

The best type of talker is slow to express positive opinions, is sparing

in criticism, and studiously avoids a tone or word of finality. It has

been well said that "A talker who monopolizes the conversation is by

common consent insufferable, and a man who regulates his choice of

topics by reference to what interests not his hearers but himself has

yet to learn the alphabet of the art. Conversation is like lawn-tennis,

and requires alacrity in return at least as much as vigor in service. A

happy phrase, an unexpected collocation of words, a habitual precision

in the choice of terms, are rare and shining ornaments of conversation,

but they do not for an instant supply the place of lively and

interesting matter, and an excessive care for them is apt to tell

unfavorably on the substance of discourse."

When Lord Beaconsfield was talking his way into social fame, someone

said of him, "I might as well attempt to gather up the foam of the sea

as to convey an idea of the extraordinary language in which he clothed

his description. There were at least five words in every sentence that

must have been very much astonished at the use they were put to, and yet

no others apparently could so well have expressed his idea. He talked

like a racehorse approaching the winning-post--every muscle in action,

and the utmost energy of expression flung out into every burst."

We are told that Matthew Arnold combined all the characteristics of good

conversation--politeness, vivacity, sympathy, interestedness, geniality,

a happy choice of words, and a never-failing humor. When he was once

asked what was his favorite topic for conversation, he instantly

answered, "That in which my companion is most interested."

Courtesy, it will be noted, is the fundamental basis of good

conversation. We must show habitual consideration and kindliness towards

others if we would attract them to us. Bluntness of manner is no longer

excused on the ground that the speaker is sincere and outspoken. We

expect and demand that our companion in conversation should observe the

recognized courtesies of speech.

There was a time when men and women indulged freely in satire, irony,

and repartee. They spoke their thoughts plainly and unequivocally. There

were no restraints imposed upon them by society, hence it now appears to

us that many things were said which might better have been left unsaid.

Self-restraint is nowadays one of the cardinal virtues of good

conversation.

The spirit of conversation is greatly changed. We are enjoined to keep

the voice low, think before we speak, repress unseasonable allusions,

shun whatever may cause a jar or jolt in the minds of others, be seldom

prominent in conversation, and avoid all clashing of opinion and

collision of feeling.

Macaulay was fond of talking, but made the mistake of always choosing a

subject to suit himself and monopolizing the conversation. He lectured

rather than talked. His marvelous memory was perhaps his greatest enemy,

for though it enabled him to pour forth great masses of facts, people

listened to him helplessly rather than admiringly.

Carlyle was a great talker, and talked much in protest of talking. No

man broke silence oftener than he to tell the world how great a curse is

talking. But he told it eloquently and therein was he justified. There

was in him too much vehement sternness, of hard Scotch granite, to make

him a pleasant talker in the popular sense. He was the evangelist of

golden silence, and though he did not apparently practice it himself,

his genius will never diminish.

Gladstone was unable to indulge in small talk. His mind was so

constantly occupied with great subjects that he spoke even to one person

as if addressing a meeting. It is said that in conversation with Queen

Victoria he would invariably choose weighty subjects, and though she

tried to make a digression, he would seize the first opportunity to

resume his original theme, always reinforced in volume and onrush by the

delay.

Lord Morley is attractive though austere in conversation. He never

dogmatizes nor obtrudes his own opinions. He is a master of

phrase-making. But although he talks well he never talks much.

The story is told that at a recent dinner in London ten leading public

men were met together, when one suggested that each gentleman present

should write down on paper the name of the man he would specially choose

to be his companion on a walking tour. When the ten papers were

subsequently read aloud, each bore the name of Lord Morley.

Lord Rosebery is considered one of the most accomplished talkers of the

day. Deferential, natural, sympathetic, observant, well-informed, he

easily and unconsciously commands the attention of any group of men. His

voice is said to recommend what he utters, and a singularly refined

accent gives distinction to anything he says. He is a supreme example of

two great qualifications for effective talking: having something worth

while to say, and knowing how to say it.

Among distinguished Canadians, Sir Thomas White is one of the most

interesting speakers. His versatile mind, and broad and varied

experience, enable him to converse with almost equal facility upon

politics, medicine, finance, law, science, art, literature, or

business. Dates, details, facts, figures, and illustrations are at his

ready command. His manner is natural, courteous, and genial, but in

argumentation the whole man is so thoroughly aroused to earnestness and

intensity as almost to overwhelm an opponent. His greatest quality in

speaking is his manifest sincerity, and it is this particularly which

has ingratiated him in the hearts of his countrymen.

The Honorable Joseph H. Choate must certainly be reckoned among the best

conversationalists of our time. His manner, both in conversation and in

public speaking, is singularly gracious and winning. He is unsurpassed

as a story-teller. His fine taste, combined with long experience as a

public man, makes him an ideal after-dinner speaker.

Some eminent men try to mask their greatness when engaged in

conversation. They do not wear their feelings nor their greatness on

their sleeves. Some have an utter distaste for anything like personal

display. It is said of the late Henry James that a stranger might talk

to him for an entire evening without discovering his identity.

There is an interesting account of an evening's conversation between

Emerson and Thoreau. When Thoreau returned home he wrote in his Journal:

"Talked, or tried to talk, with R.W.E. Lost my time, nay, almost my

identity. He, assuming a false opposition where there was no difference

of opinion, talked to the wind." Emerson's version of the conversation

was this: "It seemed as if Thoreau's first instinct on hearing a

proposition was to controvert it. That habit is chilling to the social

affections; it mars conversation."

Conversation offers daily opportunity for intellectual exercise of high

order. The reading of great books is desirable and indispensable to

education, but real culture comes through the additional training one

receives in conversation. The contact of mind with mind tends to

stimulate and develop thoughts which otherwise would probably remain

dormant.

The culture of conversation is to be recommended not only for its own

sake, but also as one of the best means of training in the art of public

speaking. Since the best form of platform address today is simply

conversation enlarged and elevated, it may almost be assumed that to

excel in one is to be proficient in the other.

Good conversation requires, among other things, mental alertness,

accuracy of statement, adequate vocabulary, facility of expression, and

an agreeable voice, and these qualities are most essential for effective

public speaking. Everyone, therefore, who aspires to speaking before an

audience of hundreds or thousands, will find his best opportunity for

preliminary training in everyday speech.

TYPES OF TALKERS

There is no greater affliction in modern life than the tiresome talker.

He talks incessantly. Presumably he talks in his sleep. Talking is his

constant exercise and recreation. He thrives on it. He lives for

talking's sake. He would languish if he were deprived of it for a single

day. His continuous practice in talking enables him easily to

outdistance all ordinary competitors. There is nothing which so

completely unnerves him as long periods of silence. He has the talking

habit in its most virulent form.

The trifling talker is equally objectionable. He talks much, but says

little. He skims over the surface of things, and is timid of anything

deep or philosophical. He does not tarry at one subject. He talks of the

weather, clothes, plays, and sports. He puts little meaning into what he

says, because there is little meaning in what he thinks. He cannot look

at anything seriously. Nothing is of great significance to him. He is

in the class of featherweights.

The tedious talker is one without terminal facilities. He talks right on

with no idea of objective or destination. He rises to go, but he does

not go. He knows he ought to go, but he simply cannot. He has something

more to say. He keeps you standing half an hour. He talks a while

longer. He assures you he really must go. You tell him not to hurry. He

takes you at your word and sits down again. He talks some more. He rises

again. He does not know even now how to conclude. He has no mental

compass. He is a rudderless talker.

Probably the most obnoxious type is the tattling talker. He always has

something startlingly personal to impart. It is a sacred secret for your

ear. He is a wholesale dealer in gossip. He fairly smacks his lips as he

relates the latest scandal. He is an expert embellisher. He adroitly

supplies missing details. He has nothing of interest in his own life,

since he lives wholly in the lives of others. He is a frightful bore,

but you cannot offend him. He is adamant.

There is the tautological talker, or the human self-repeater. He goes

over the ground again and again lest you have missed something. He is

very fond of himself. He tells the same story not twice, but a dozen

times. "You may have heard this before," says he, "but it is so good

that it will bear repetition." He tries to disguise his poverty of

thought in a masquerade of ornate language. If he must repeat his words,

he adds a little emphasis, a flourishing gesture, or a spirit of

nonchalance.

Again, there is the tenacious talker, who refuses to release you though

you concede his arguments. When all others tacitly drop a subject, he

eagerly picks it up. He is reluctant to leave it. He would put you in

possession of his special knowledge. You may successfully refute him,

but he holds firmly to his own ideas. He is positive he is right. He

will prove it, too, if you will only listen. He knows that he knows. You

cannot convince him to the contrary, no indeed. He will talk you so

blind that at last you are unable to see any viewpoint clearly.

A recognized type is the tactless talker. He says the wrong thing in

the right way, and the right thing in the wrong way. He is impulsive and

unguarded. He reaches hasty conclusions. He confuses his tactlessness

with cleverness. He is awkward and blundering. His indifference to the

rights and feelings of others is his greatest enemy. He is a stranger to

discretion. He speaks first, and thinks afterwards. He may have regrets,

but not resolutions. He is often tolerated, but seldom esteemed.

The temperamental talker is one of the greatest of nerve-destroyers. He

deals in superlatives. He views everything emotionally. He talks

feelingly of trifles, and ecstatically of friends. He gushes. He

flatters. To him everything is "wonderful," "prodigious," "superb,"

"gorgeous," "heavenly," "amazing," "indescribable," "overwhelming."

Extravagance and exaggeration permeate his most commonplace

observations. He is an incurable enthusiast.

The tantalizing talker is one who likes to contradict you. He divides

his attention between what you are saying and what he can summon to

oppose you. He dissents from your most ordinary observations. His

favorite phrases are, "I don't think so," "There is where you are

wrong," "I beg to differ," and "Not only that." Tell him it will be a

fine day, and he will declare that the signs indicate foul weather. Say

that the day is unpromising, and he will assure you it does not look

that way to him. He cavils at trifles. He disputes even when there is no

antagonist.

To listen to the tortuous talker is a supreme test of patience. He

slowly winds his way in and out of a subject. He traverses by-paths,

allowing nothing to escape his unwearied eye. He goes a long way about,

but never tires of his circuitous journey. Ploddingly and perseveringly

he zigzags from one point to another. He alters his course as often as

the crooked way of his subject changes. He twists, turns, and diverges

without the slightest inconvenience to himself. He likes nothing better

than to trace out details. His talking disease is discursiveness.

The tranquil talker never hurries. He has all the time there is. If you

are very busy he will wait. He is uniformly moderate and polite. He is

a rare combination of oil, milk, and rose-water. He would not harm a

syllable of the English language. His talking has a soporific effect. It

acts as a lullaby. His speech is low and gentle. He never speaks an

ill-considered word. He chooses his words with measured caution. He is

what is known as a smooth talker.

The torpedo talker is of the rapid fire explosive variety. He bursts

into a conversation. He scatters labials, dentals, and gutturals in all

directions. He is a war-time talker,--boom, burst, bang, roar, crash,

thud! He fills the air with vocal bullets and syllabic shrapnel. He is

trumpet-tongued, ear-splitting, deafening. He fires promiscuously at all

his hearers. He rends the skies asunder. He is nothing if not

vociferous, stentorian, lusty. He demolishes every idea in his way. He

is a Napoleon of words.

The tangled talker never gets anything quite straight. He inevitably

spoils the best story. He always begins at the wrong end. Despite your

protests of face and manner he talks on. He talks inopportunely. He

becomes inextricably confused. He is weak in statistics. He has no

memory for names or places. He lacks not fluency but accuracy. He is a

twisted talker.

The triumphant talker lays claim to the star part in any conversation.

He likes nothing better than to drive home his point and then look about

exultingly. He says gleefully, "I told you so." That he can ever be

wrong is inconceivable to him. He knows the facts since he can readily

manufacture them himself. He is self-satisfied, for in his own opinion

he has never lost an argument. He is a brave and bold talker.

These, then, are some types of talking which we should not emulate.

Study the list carefully--the tiresome talker, the trifling talker, the

tedious talker, the tattling talker, the tautological talker, the

tenacious talker, the tactless talker, the temperamental talker, the

tantalizing talker, the tangled talker, the triumphant talker--and guard

yourself diligently against the faults which they represent. Talking

should always be a pleasure to the speaker and listener, never a bore.

TALKERS AND TALKING

Conversation is not a verbal nor vocal contest, but a mutual meeting of

minds. It is not a monologue, but a reciprocal exchange of ideas.

There are cardinal rules which everyone should observe in conversation.

The first of these is to be prepared always to give courteous and

considerate attention to the ideas of others. There is no better way to

cultivate your own conversational powers than to train yourself first to

be an interesting and sympathetic listener.

It is in bad taste to interrupt a speaker. This is a common fault which

should be resolutely guarded against. Moreover, your own opportunity to

speak will shortly come if you have patience, when you may reasonably

expect to receive the same uninterrupted attention which you have given

to others.

Never allow yourself to monopolize a conversation. This is a form of

selfishness practiced by many persons apparently unaware of being

ill-mannered. It is inexcusably bad taste to tell unduly long stories or

lengthy personal experiences. If you cannot abridge a story to

reasonable dimensions, it would be better to omit it entirely. The

habitual long-story teller may easily become a bore.

Avoid the habit of eagerly matching the other person's story or

experience with one of your own. There is nothing more disconcerting to

a speaker than to observe the listener impatiently waiting to plunge

headlong into the conversation with some marvellous tale. Be

particularly careful not to outdo another speaker in relating your own

experiences. If, for instance, he has just told how he caught fifty fish

upon a recent trip, do not succumb to the temptation to tell of the time

you caught fifty-one.

Be careful not to give unsolicited advice. It has been well said that

advice which costs nothing is worth what it costs. If people desire your

counsel they will probably ask for it, in which case they will be more

likely to appreciate what you have to tell them.

Do not voluntarily recommend doctors, dentists, osteopaths, pills,

coffee substitutes, health foods, health resorts, or panaceas for the

ills of mankind. If you can be of service to others in these particular

respects, it will be when you are specifically asked for such

information.

It is most imprudent to carry an argument to extremes. If you observe an

unwillingness in the other person to be convinced by what you say, you

had better turn to another subject. Conversation should never resolve

itself into controversial debate.

It is well to avoid discursiveness, over-use of parentheses, and

positiveness of statement. Keep your desires and feelings from

over-coloring your views. A flexible attitude of mind is more likely to

win an opponent to your way of thinking.

Take special pains to enter into the minds and feelings of others. Be

interested in what they want to talk about. Let your interest be deep

and sincere. Adopt the right tone, temper, and reticence in your

conversation.

You should accustom yourself to look at things from the other person's

standpoint. It is surprising how this habit enlarges the vision and

gives a charitableness to speech which might otherwise be absent. It is

well to remember that no person can possibly have a monopoly of

knowledge upon any subject.

Good conversation demands restraint, adaptability, and reasonable

brevity. There is an appalling waste of words on all sides, hence you

should constantly guard yourself against this fault. When there is

nothing worth-while to say, the best substitute is silence.

Practice self-discipline in talking. Correct any fault in yourself the

instant you recognize it. If, for example, you realize that you are

talking at too great length, stop it at once. Should you feel that you

are not giving interested attention to the speaker, check your

mind-wandering immediately and concentrate upon what is being said.

Do not be always setting other people right. This is a thankless as well

as useless task. They probably do not want your assistance, or they

would ask for it. Besides most people are sensitive about their

shortcomings, and prefer to get help and counsel in private.

There is no more important suggestion than to rule your moods. Ofttimes

the feelings run away with the judgment. What you think and say today

may be due to your present mood, rather than to matured judgment. Let

your common sense predominate at all times.

It is not well to give too strong expression to your likes and dislikes.

These, like all your feelings, should be governed with a firm hand.

Opinions advanced with too much emphasis may easily fail to impress

other minds. Remember always that your greatest ally is truth. Therefore

frankly and faithfully examine your important opinions before giving

them expression.

Resist the desire to be prominent in conversation, or to say clever and

surprising things. This is sometimes difficult to do, but it is the only

safe course to follow. If you have something brilliant or worth-while to

say, it will be best said spontaneously and with due modesty. But if

there is no suitable opportunity to say it, put it back in your mind

where it may improve with age. Egotism is taboo in polite society.

The suggestion that nothing should be allowed to pass the lips that

charity would check is invaluable advice. It is unfortunately all too

common to give hasty and harsh expression to personal opinions and

criticisms. Reticence is one of the most essential conditions of long

friendship.

Judgment and tact are necessary to good conversation. It is not well to

ask many questions, and then only those of a general character.

Curiosity should be curbed. Quite properly people resent

inquisitiveness. The best way to cultivate the rare grace of judgment is

to be mindful of your own faults and to correct them with all speed and

thoroughness.

The word "talk" is often used in a derogatory sense, and we hear such

expressions as "all talk," "empty talk," and "idle talk." But as

everyone talks, we should all do our utmost to set a high example to

others of the correct use of speech.

It is always better to talk too little than too much. Never talk for

mere talking's sake. Avoid being artificial or pedantic. Don't

antagonize, dogmatize, moralize, attitudinize, nor criticise. Talk in

poise,--quietly, deliberately, sincerely, and you will never lack an

attentive audience.

PHRASES FOR TALKERS

It is said of Macaulay that he never allowed a sentence to pass muster

until it was as good as he could make it. He would write and rewrite,

and even construct a paragraph or a whole chapter, in order to secure a

more lucid and satisfactory arrangement. He wrote just so much each day,

usually an average of six pages, and this manuscript was so erased and

corrected that it was finally compressed into two pages of print.

The masters of English prose have been great workers. Stevenson and

others like him gave hours and days to the study of words, phrases, and

sentences. Through unwearied application to the art of rhetorical

composition they ultimately won fame as writers.

The ambitious student of speech culture, whether for use in conversation

or in public, will do well to emulate the example of such great

writers. One of the best ways to build a large vocabulary is to note

useful and striking phrases in one's general reading. It is advisable to

jot down such phrases in a note-book, and to read them aloud from time

to time. Such phrases may be classified according to their particular

application,--to business, politics, music, education, literature, or

the drama.

It is not recommended that such phrases should be consciously dragged

into conversation, but the practice of carefully observing felicitous

phrases, and of noting them in writing, cultivates the taste for better

words and a sense of discrimination in their use. Many phrases noted and

studied in this way will unconsciously find their way into one's

expression.

The list of phrases which follows is offered as merely suggestive. In

reading the phrases aloud it is well to think clearly what each one

means, and to fit it into a sentence of one's own making. This simple

exercise, practiced for a few weeks, will produce surprising results by

way of increased facility and flexibility of English style.

It is obviously desirable

I can well imagine

Broadly speaking

An admirable idea

In a literal sense

By sheer force of genius

You can imagine his chagrin

I hazard a guess

It challenges belief

He has an inscrutable face

Very fertile in resource

I am loath to believe

It is essentially undignified

Example is so contagious

I am not in her confidence

Taken in the aggregate

It is a reproof to shallowness

There is a misconception here

I strongly suspect it so

He was covered with confusion

It was a just rebuke

A pleasing instance of this

It lends dignity to life

She has a desultory liking for music

It seems incredible

A kind of detached ideal

It blunts the finer sensibilities

Beyond question or cavil

A well-founded suspicion

It has elicited great praise

They are landmarks in memory

Superhuman vigor and activity

A venerable and interesting figure

It is curious and interesting

Gives the impression of aloofness

Perfectly void of offence

Regard with misgiving

A stroke of professional luck

An unscrupulous adventurer

He spoke with extreme reticence

Robust common sense

Deficient in amiability

Done with characteristic thoroughness

A vein of philanthropic zeal

Definite, tangible, and practical

Too much effusive declamation

A man of keen ambition

It gives infinite zest

Singular qualifications for public life

They are bitterly hostile

The despair of the official wire-puller

Blind and unreasoning opponent

Ignoble strife for power

Surrounded by a cohort of admiring friends

In an imperative voice

Marked by copiousness and vivacity

Touched with sombre dignity

A ridiculous misconception

Habitual austerity of demeanor

Ostentation and lavish expenditure

A person of exquisite tact

Intolerant of bumptiousness

The obvious danger of dallying

This was grossly overstated

A mass of calumny and exaggeration

Inimical to religion

Fraught with peril

I venture to ask

Attributed to mental decrepitude

A strange phenomena

It argues a blind faith

Insatiable whirl of excitement

A substratum of truth

Under some conceivable circumstances

Bubbling over with infectious joy

Frigid dignity and arrogant reserve

A profound contempt

The fine art of hospitality

Grim morsels of philosophy

A tinge of sorrowness and jealousy

Due to ignorance and barbarism

Grave and monstrous scandal

A splendid instance of self-devotion

Amusingly exemplified in this case

Recognized and powerful element

A symbol of restraint

An utterly fallacious idea

In rapid and striking succession

We learn from stern experience

Pictures of an inspired imagination

An astonishing outbreak

Soothing words of sympathy

A rather bold assertion

The most enthusiastic adherents

Mere tepid conviction

Eminently qualified for the task

Almost supernatural charm

In glowing and exaggerated phrases

Somewhat rich and austere

An inexhaustible theme

Grave and undeniable faults

Perfectly chosen language

All the characteristics of a mob

Given to grandiloquent phrase

Peculiar vein of sarcasm

Froze like ice and cut like steel

A generous tribute to an eminent rival

Cold and stately composure

Fiery and passionate enthusiasm

Extraordinary violence of nature

A brilliant and delightful play

Rare and striking combination

Preeminently qualified for the part

Moderate and cautious conservatism

Daring perversions of justice

Devoid of rhetorical device

As a great thinker has observed

Almost morbid sensitiveness

Discreetly stifled yawn

He was dumb with wonder

Scarcely less familiar

Delightfully characteristic

It was a profound conviction

Greatly conceived and expressed

Blinded by its brightness

I have cudgelled my memory

Exposed to imminent peril

Screening a breach of etiquette

By a natural transition

Splendid anticipations of success

A very laudable attempt

Lapsed into complete oblivion

With most distinguished success

Like embarking on a shoreless sea

A really pretty imitation

Unless I greatly err

Undaunted by repeated failure

Became a term of reproach

An epoch-making achievement

In the guise of verbal nonsense

Received with cordial sympathy

With the most obvious sincerity

Held forth with fluency and zest

Gracious solicitude

Punctiliously civil and polite

An air of sphinx-like mystery

Consumed by zeal

Awaited with lively interest

Sledge-hammer blows against humbug

This recalls a happy retort

Preeminently a case in point

Exquisite precision and finish

Incomparably better informed

A keen eye for incongruities

Polite to the point of deference

To the last degree improbable

People with rampant prejudices

A model of chivalrous propriety

By way of digression

A splendid acquisition

Singularly attractive fashion

A kind of unconscious conspiracy

Amid engrossing demands

THE SPEAKING VOICE

There is a widespread need for a more thorough cultivation of the

speaking voice. It is astonishing how few persons give specific

attention to this important subject. On all sides we are subjected to

voices that are disagreeable and strident. It is the exception to hear a

voice that is musical and well-modulated.

Most people make too much physical effort in speaking. They tighten the

muscles of the throat and mouth, instead of liberating these muscles and

allowing the voice to flow naturally and harmoniously. The remedy for

this common fault of vocal tension is to relax all the muscles used in

speech. This is easily accomplished by means of a little daily practice.

The first thing to keep in mind is that we should speak through the

throat and not from it. A musical quality of voice depends chiefly upon

directing the tone towards the hard palate, or the bony arch above the

upper teeth. From this part of the mouth the voice acquires much of its

resonance.

An excellent exercise for throat relaxation is yawning. It is not

necessary to wait until a real yawn presents itself, but frequent

practice in imitating a yawn may be indulged in with good results.

Immediately after practicing the yawn, it is advisable to test the

voice, either in speaking or in reading, to observe improvement in

freedom of tone.

It is not desirable to use the voice where there is loud noise by way of

opposition. Many a good voice has been ruined due to the habit of

continuous talking on the street or elsewhere amid clatter and hubbub.

Under such circumstances it is better to rest the voice, since in any

contest of the kind the voice will almost surely be vanquished.

What we need in our daily conversation is less emphasis, and more

quietness and non-resistance. We need less eagerness and more vivacity

and variety. We need a settled equanimity of mind that does not deprive

us of our animation, but saves us from the petty irritations of

everyday life. We need, in short, more poise and self-control in our way

of speaking.

It is well to remember that few things we say are of such importance as

to require emphasis. The thought should be its own recommendation. But

if emphasis be necessary, let it be by the intellectual means of pausing

or inflection, rather than with the shoulders or the clenched fist.

A very disagreeable and common fault is nasality, or "talking through

the nose." Many persons are guilty of this who least suspect it. This

habit is so easily and unconsciously acquired that everyone should be on

strict guard against it. Almost equally disagreeable is the fault of

throatiness, caused by holding the muscles of the throat instead of

relaxing them.

The best tones of the speaking voice are the middle and low keys. These

should be used exclusively in daily conversation. The use of high pitch

is due to habit or temperament, but may be overcome through judicious

practice. The objection to a high-keyed voice is not only that it is

disagreeable to the listener, but puts the speaker "out of tune" with

his audience.

A good speaking voice should possess the qualities of purity, resonance,

flexibility, roundness, brilliancy, and adequate power. These qualities

can be rapidly developed by daily reading aloud for ten minutes, giving

special attention to one quality at a time. A few weeks, assiduous

practice will produce most gratifying results. The voice grows through

use, and it grows precisely in the way it is habitually used.

Distinct articulation and correct pronunciation are indications of

cultivated speech. Pedantry should be avoided, but every aspirant to

correct speech should be a student of the dictionary. A writer has given

this good counsel:

"Resolve that you will never use an incorrect, an inelegant, or a vulgar

phrase or word, in any society whatever. If you are gifted with wit, you

will soon find that it is easy to give it far better point and force in

pure English than through any other medium, and that brilliant thoughts

make the deepest impressions when well worded. However great it may be,

the labor is never lost which earns for you the reputation of one who

habitually uses the language of a gentleman, or of a lady. It is

difficult for those who have not frequent opportunities for conversation

with well-educated people, to avoid using expressions which are not

current in society, although they may be of common occurrence in books.

As they are often learned from novels, it will be well for the reader to

remember that even in the best of such works dialogues are seldom

sustained in a tone which would not appear affected in ordinary life.

This fault in conversation is the most difficult of all to amend, and it

is unfortunately the one to which those who strive to express themselves

correctly are peculiarly liable. Its effect is bad, for though it is not

like slang, vulgar in itself, it betrays an effort to conceal vulgarity.

It may generally be remedied by avoiding any word or phrase which you

may suspect yourself of using for the purpose of creating an effect.

Whenever you imagine that the employment of any mere word or sentence

will convey the impression that you are well informed, substitute for

it some simple expression. If you are not positively certain as to the

pronunciation of a word, never use it. If the temptation be great,

resist it; for, rely upon it, if there be in your mind the slightest

doubt on the subject, you will certainly make a mistake. Never use a

foreign word when its meaning can be given in English, and remember that

it is both rude and silly to say anything to any person who possibly may

not understand it. But never attempt, under any circumstances whatever,

to utter a foreign word, unless you have learned to pronounce correctly

the language to which it belongs."

There is need for the admonition to open the mouth well. Many people

speak with half-closed teeth, the result being that the quality of voice

and correctness of pronunciation are greatly impaired. Consonants and

vowels should be given proper significance. Muffled speech is almost as

objectionable as stammering.

It enhances the pleasure and quality of conversation to speak in

deliberate style. Rapidity of utterance often leads a speaker into such

faults as indistinctness, monotony, and incorrect breathing. Deliberate

speaking confers many advantages, not the least of which is increased

pleasure to the listener.

Many voices are too thin in quality. They fail to carry conviction even

when the thought is of superior character. The remedy here is to give

special attention to the development of deep tones. One of the best

exercises for this purpose is to practice for a few minutes daily upon

the vowel sound "O," endeavoring to make it full, deep, and melodious.

For all-round vocal development this practice should be done with varied

force and inflection, and on high as well as low keys of the voice.

The best remedy for a weak voice is to practice daily upon explosives,

expelling the principal vowel sounds, on various keys, using the

abdominal muscles throughout. Another good exercise is to read aloud

while walking upstairs or uphill. As these exercises are somewhat

extreme, the student is recommended to practice them prudently.

Correct breathing is fundamental to correct and agreeable speaking. The

breathing apparatus should be brought under control by daily practice

upon exercises prescribed in any standard book on elocution. Pure tone

of voice depends upon the ability to convert into tone every particle of

breath used. Aspirated voice, in which some of the breath is allowed to

escape unvocalized, is injurious to the throat, and unpleasant to the

listening ear.

The speaker, whether in conversation or in public, should try always to

speak with an adequate supply of breath. Deliberate utterance will give

the necessary opportunity to replenish the lungs, so that the speaker

will not suffer from unnecessary fatigue. Needless to say, the habit

should be formed of breathing through the nose when in repose.

There is a voice of unusual roundness and fulness known as the orotund,

which is indispensable to the public speaker. It is simple, pure tone,

rounded out into greater fulness. It is produced mainly by an increased

resonance of the chest and mouth cavities, and a more vigorous action of

the abdominal muscles. It has the character of fulness, but it is not

necessarily a loud tone. It is in no sense artificial, but simply an

enlargement of the natural conversational voice.

The use of the orotund voice varies according to the intensity of the

thought and feeling being expressed. It is used in language of great

dignity, power, grandeur, and sublimity. It is appropriate in certain

forms of public prayer and Bible reading. It enables the public speaker

to vary from his conversational style. It gives vastly increased scope

and power, by enabling the speaker to bring into play all the resources

of vocal force and intensity.

Where resonance of voice is lacking, it can be rapidly developed by

means of humming the letter _m_, with lips closed, and endeavoring to

make the face vibrate. The tone should be kept well forward throughout

the exercise, pressing firmly against the lips and hard palate. Later

the exercise may begin with the humming _m_, and be developed, while the

lips are opened gradually, into the tone of _ah_, still aiming to

maintain the original resonance.

The speaking voice is capable of most wonderful development. There is a

duty devolving upon everyone to cultivate beauty of vocal utterance and

diction. Crudities of speech so commonly in evidence are mainly due to

carelessness and neglect. It is a hopeful sign, however, that greater

attention is now being given to this important subject than heretofore.

Surely there is nothing more important than the development of the

principal instrument by which men communicate with one another. As Story

says:

"O, how our organ can speak with its many and wonderful voices!--

Play on the soft lute of love, blow the loud trumpet of war,

Sing with the high sesquialter, or, drawing its full diapason,

Shake all the air with the grand storm of its pedals and stops."

HOW TO TELL A STORY

Someone has wittily said that only those in their anecdotage should tell

stories. De Quincey wanted all story-tellers to be submerged in a

horse-pond, or treated in the same manner as mad dogs. But story-telling

has its legitimate and appropriate use, and if certain rules are

observed may give added charm to conversation and public speaking.

It requires a fine discrimination to know when to tell a story, and when

not to tell one though it is urging itself to be expressed. Few men have

the rare gift of choosing the right story for the particular occasion.

Many men have no difficulty in telling stories that are insufferably

long, pointless, and uninteresting.

We have all been victims of a certain type of public speaker who begins

by saying, "Now I don't want to bore you with a long story, but this is

so good, etc.," or "An incident occurred at the American Consulate in

Shanghai, which reminds me of an awfully good story, etc." When a

speaker prefaces his remarks with some such sentences as these, we know

we are in for an uncomfortable time.

As far as possible a story should be new, clever, short, simple,

inoffensive, and appropriate. As such stories are scarce, it is

advisable to set them down, when found, in a special note-book for

convenient reference. It is said that Chauncey M. Depew, one of the most

gifted of after-dinner speakers, was for many years in the habit of

keeping a set of scrap-books in which were preserved stories and other

interesting data clipped from newspapers and magazines. These were so

classified that he could on short notice refresh his mind with ample

material upon almost any general subject.

Anyone who essays to tell a story should have it clearly in mind. It is

fatal for a speaker to hesitate midway in a story, apologize for not

knowing it better, avow that it was much more humorous when told to him,

and in other ways to announce his shortcomings. If he cannot tell a

story fluently and interestingly, he should first practice it on his own

family--provided they will tolerate it.

Some stories should be committed to memory, especially where the point

of humor depends upon exact phraseology. In such case, it requires some

training and experience to disguise the memorized effort. A story like

the following, for obvious reasons, should be thoroughly memorized:

The longest sermon on record occupied three hours and a half. But the

shortest sermon was that of a preacher who spoke for one minute on the

text: "Man is born unto trouble as the sparks fly upward." He said:

"I shall divide my discourse into three heads: (1) Man's ingress into

the world; (2) His progress through the world; (3) His egress out of the

world.

"Firstly, His ingress into the world is naked and bare.

"Secondly, His progress through the world is trouble and care.

"Thirdly, His egress out of the world is nobody knows where.

"To conclude:

"If we live well here, we shall live well there.

"I can tell you no more if I preach a whole year.

"The collection will now be taken up."

Dialect stories are usually rather difficult, and should not as a

general thing be attempted by beginners. As a matter of fact, few

persons know how to speak such dialects as Irish, Scotch, German,

Cockney, and negro without undue exaggeration. For most occasions it is

well to keep to simple stories couched in plain English.

A story should be told in simple, conversational style. Concentration

upon the story, and a sincere desire to give pleasure to the hearers,

will keep the speaker free from self-consciousness. Needless to say he

should not be the first to laugh at his own story. Sometimes in telling

a humorous anecdote to an audience a speaker secures the greatest effect

by maintaining an expression of extreme gravity.

No matter how successful one may be in telling stories, he should avoid

telling too many. A man who is accounted brilliant and entertaining may

become an insufferable bore by continuing to tell stories when the

hearers have become satiated. Of all speakers, the story-teller should

keep his eyes on his entire audience and be alert to detect the

slightest signs of weariness.

It is superfluous to say that a story should never be told which in any

way might give offence. The speaker may raise a laugh, but lose a

friend. Hence it is that stories about stammerers, red-headed people,

mothers-in-law, and the like, should always be chosen with

discrimination.

Generally the most effective story is one in which the point of humor is

not disclosed until the very last words, as in the following:

An old colored man was brought up before a country judge.

"Jethro," said the judge, "you are accused of stealing General Johnson's

chickens. Have you any witnesses?"

"No, sah," old Jethro answered, haughtily; "I hab not, sah. I never

steal chickens befo' witnesses."

Talks on Talking · 第 1 / 6 段