VI.

It remains, before giving account of the finest action of his life, to

consider briefly, by way of rounding his portrait, what we may call

Andrews' outside aspect--the side, that is, he might turn to some

Committee of Experts sitting in solemn judgment upon him as a possible

candidate for political honours.

That side, it may be said at once, is singularly unpretentious; and

indeed when we think of his absorption, heart and soul, in what he knew

for him was best, who could expect, or wish, it to be otherwise? In

Ulster, heaven knows, are publicists galore, and sufficient men too

willing to down tools at any outside horn-blow, that we should the less

admire one who spoke only once in public, took no open part in politics,

and was not even a strong party-man. He was, however, a member of the

Ulster Reform Club. Twice he was pressed to accept the presidency of

Unionist Clubs. Frequently he was urged to permit his nomination for

election to the City Council. The Belfast Harbour Board shared the

opinion of one of its leading members that "his youthful vigour, his

undoubted ability, and his genial personality, would have made him an

acquisition to this important Board." His fellow-directors, in a

resolution of condolence, expressed their feeling that "not only had the

Firm lost a valued and promising leader, but the city an upright and

capable citizen, who, had he lived, would have taken a still more

conspicuous place in the industrial and commercial world." Even in the

south, where admiration of Northerners is not commonly fervent, it was

admitted by many that in Andrews Ulster had at last found the makings of

a leader.

From such straws, blown in so prevailing a wind, we may determine the

estimation in which Andrews, as a prospective citizen, stood amongst

those who knew him and their own needs the best; and also perhaps may

roughly calculate the possibilities of that future which he himself, in

stray minutes of leisure, may have anticipated. But some there will be

doubtless whose admiration of Andrews is the finer because he kept the

path of his career straight to its course without any deviation to

enticing havens.

Such a man, however, the son of such a father, could not fail to have

views on the burning topics of his time, and no estimate of him would

be complete which gave these no heed.

He was, we are told, an Imperialist, loving peace and consequently in

favour of an unchallengeable Navy. He was a firm Unionist, being

convinced that Home Rule would spell financial ruin to Ireland, through

the partial loss of British credit, and of the security derived from

connection with a strong and prosperous partner. At times he was known

to express disapproval of the policy adopted by those Irish Unionists

who strove to influence British electors by appeals to passion rather

than by means of reasoned argument. Also he felt that Ireland would

never be happy and prosperous until agitation ceased and promise of

security were offered to the investing capitalist.

Though no believer in modern cities, he was of opinion that an effort

should be made to expand and stimulate Irish village life, it seeming to

him that a country dependent solely on agriculture was like a man

fighting the battle of life with one hand. Were, however, an approved

system of agriculture, such as that advocated by Sir Horace Plunkett,

joined with a considered scheme of town and village industries, he

believed that emigration would cease and Ireland find prosperity.

To the practical application of Tariff Reform he saw many difficulties,

but thought them not insuperable. In view of the needs of a world-wide

and growing Empire, "the necessity of preserving British work for

British people," and the injury done to home trade by the unfair

competition of protected countries, he judged that the duties upon

imported necessities should be materially reduced and a counterbalancing

tax levied on all articles of foreign manufacture.

He advocated moderate Social reform on lines carefully designed to

encourage thrift, temperance and endeavour; and as one prime means

towards improving the condition, both moral and physical, of the workers

he would have the State, either directly or through local authorities,

provide them with decent homes.

To the consideration of Labour problems, particularly those coming

within the scope of his own experience, he gave much thought; and when

it is considered that his great popularity with all classes held steady

through the recent period of industrial unrest, we may judge that his

attitude towards Labour, in the mass as in the unit, was no mere

personal expression of friendliness. As his real pals he wanted to help

the workers, educate and lift them. Other things being equal, he always

favoured the men who used their heads as well as their hands; and if in

the management of their own affairs they used their heads, then also, so

much the better for all concerned. He considered that both in the

interests of men and masters, it was well for Labour to be organized

under capable leaders; but honest agreements should, he thought, be

binding on both sides and not liable to governmental interference.

Politicians and others should in their public utterances, he felt,

endeavour to educate the workers in the principles of economics relative

to trade, wages and the relations between capital and labour; but

publicists who, for party or like reasons, strove to foster class

hatreds and strifes he would hang by the heels from a gantry.

Where economically possible, the working day should, he thought, be

shortened, especially the day of all toiling in arduous and unwholesome

conditions. Similarly he was disposed to favour, when economically

possible, encouragement of the workers by means of a system of profit

sharing. He would, furthermore, give them every facility for technical

education, but such he knew from experience was of little value unless

supplemented by thorough practical knowledge gained in the workshop.

These views and opinions, whatever their intrinsic value in the eyes of

experts, are at least interesting. Sooner or later, had Andrews lived,

he would perhaps have made them the basis of public pronouncements; and

then indeed might his abounding energy, applied in new and luring

directions, have carried him to heights of citizenship.

Thomas Andrews, Shipbuilder · 第 10 / 18 题