VI.

But if Canada can point to some creditable achievement of recent

years in history, poetry and essay-writing--for I think if one looks

from time to time at the leading magazines and reviews of the two

continents he will find that Canada is fairly well represented in their

pages[44]--there is one respect in which Canadians have never won any

marked success, and that is in the novel or romance. "Wacousta, or

the Prophecy: a Tale of the Canadas," was written sixty years ago by

Major John Richardson,[45_a_] a native Canadian, but it was at the

best a spirited imitation of Cooper, and has not retained the interest

it attracted at a time when the American novelist had created a taste

for exaggerated pictures of Indian life and forest scenery. Of course

attempts have been made time and again by other English Canadians to

describe episodes of our history, and portray some of our national and

social characteristics, but with the single exception of "The Golden

Dog,"[45] written a few years ago by Mr. William Kirby, of Niagara, I

cannot point to one which shows much imaginative or literary skill.

If we except the historical romance by Mr. Marmette, "François de

Bienville,"[46] which has had several editions, French Canada is even

weak in this particular, and this is the more surprising because there

is abundance of material for the novelist or writer of romance in her

peculiar society and institutions, and in her historic annals and

traditions. But as yet neither a Cooper, nor an Irving, nor a Hawthorne

has appeared to delight Canadians in the fruitful field of fiction that

their country offers to the pen of imaginative genius. It is true we

have a work by De Gaspé, "Les Anciens Canadiens,"[47] which has been

translated by Roberts and one or two others, but it has rather the

value of historical annals than the spirit and form of true romance.

It is the very poverty of our production in what ought to be a rich

source of literary inspiration, French Canadian life and history, that

has given currency to a work whose signal merit is its simplicity of

style and adherence to historical fact. As Parkman many years ago first

commenced to illumine the too often dull pages of Canadian history,

so other American writers have also ventured in the still fresh field

of literary effort that romance offers to the industrious, inventive

brain. In the "Romance of Dollard," "Tonty," and the "Lady of Fort St.

John," Mrs. Mary Hartwell Catherwood has recalled most interesting

episodes of our past annals with admirable literary taste and a deep

enthusiasm for Canadian history in its romantic and picturesque

aspects.[48] When we read Conan Doyle's "Refugees"--the best historical

novel that has appeared from the English Press for years--we may well

regret that it is not Canadian genius which has created so fascinating

a romance out of the materials that exist in the history of the

_ancien régime_. Dr. Doyle's knowledge of Canadian life and history is

obviously very superficial; but slight as it is he has used it with a

masterly skill to give Canada a part in his story--to show how closely

associated were the fortunes of the colony with the French Court,--with

the plans and intrigues of the king and his mistresses, and of the

wily ecclesiastics who made all subservient to their deep purpose. It

would seem from our failure to cultivate successfully the same popular

branch of letters that Canadians are wanting in the inventive and

imaginative faculty, and that the spirit of materialism and practical

habits, which has so long necessarily cramped literary effort in this

country, still prevents happy ventures in this direction. It is a pity

that no success has been won in this country,--as in Australia by Mrs.

Campbell Praed, "Tasma," and many others,--in the way of depicting

those characteristics of Canadian life, in the past and present, which,

when touched by the imaginative and cultured intellect, will reach the

sympathies and earn the plaudits of all classes of readers at home and

abroad. Perhaps, Mr. Gilbert Parker,[49] now a resident of London,

but a Canadian by birth, education and sympathies, will yet succeed

in his laudable ambition of giving form and vitality to the abundant

materials that exist in the Dominion, among the habitants on the old

seigneuries of the French province, in that historic past of which the

ruins still remain in Montreal and Quebec, in the Northwest with its

quarrels of adventurers in the fur trade, and in the many other sources

of inspiration that exist in this country for the true story-teller who

can invent a plot and give his creations a touch of reality, and not

that doll-like, saw-dust appearance that the vapid characters of some

Canadian stories assume from the very poverty of the imagination that

has originated them.

That imagination and humour have some existence in the Canadian

mind--though one sees little of those qualities in the press or in

public speeches, or in parliamentary debates--we can well believe

when we read "The Dodge Club Abroad," by Professor De Mille,[50] who

was cut off in the prime of his intellectual strength, or "A Social

Departure," by Sara Jeannette Duncan,[51] who, as a sequence of a trip

around the world, has given us not a dry book of travels but a story

with touches of genial humour and bright descriptions of life and

nature, and who is now following up that excellent literary effort by

promising sketches of East Indian life. A story which attracted some

attention not long since for originality of conception and ran through

several editions, "Beggars All," is written by a Miss L. Dougall, who

is said to be a member of a Montreal family, and though this book does

not deal with incidents of Canadian life it illustrates that fertility

of invention which is latent among our people and only requires a

favourable opportunity to develop itself. The best literature of this

kind is like that of France, which has the most intimate correspondence

with the social life and development of the people of the country.

"The excellence of a romance," writes Chevalier Bunsen in his critical

preface to Gustav Freytag's "Debit and Credit," "like that of an epic

or a drama, lies in the apprehension and truthful exhibition of the

course of human things.... The most vehement longing of our times

is manifestly after a faithful mirror of the present." With us, all

efforts in this direction have been most common place--hardly above the

average of "Social Notes" in the columns of Ottawa newspapers.

I do not for one depreciate the influence of good fiction on the minds

of a reading community like ours; it is inevitable that a busy people,

and especially women distracted with household cares, should always

find that relief in this branch of literature which no other reading

can give them; and if the novel has then become a necessity of the

times in which we live, at all events I hope Canadians, who may soon

venture into the field, will study the better models, endeavour to

infuse some originality into their creations and plots, and not bring

the Canadian fiction of the future to that low level to which the

school of realism in France, and in a minor degree in England and the

United States, would degrade the novel and story of every-day life.

To my mind it goes without saying that a history written with that

fidelity to original authorities, that picturesqueness of narration,

that philosophic insight into the motives and plans of statesmen, that

study and comprehension of the character and life of a people, which

should constitute the features of a great work of this class,--that

such a history has assuredly a much deeper and more useful purpose

in the culture and education of the world than any work of fiction

can possibly have even when animated by a lofty genius. Still as the

novel and romance will be written as long as a large proportion of the

world amid the cares and activities of life seeks amusement rather

than knowledge, it is for the Canadian Scott, or Hawthorne, or "George

Eliot," or Dickens of the future, to have a higher and purer aim than

the majority of novel writers of the present day, who, with a few

notable exceptions like Black, Besant, Barrie, Stephenson or Oliphant,

weary us by their dulness and lack of the imaginative and inventive

faculty, and represent rather the demands of the publishers to meet the

requirements of a public which must have its new novel as regularly as

the Scotchman must have his porridge, the Englishman his egg and toast,

and the American his ice-water.

If it were possible within the compass of this address to give a list

of the many histories, poems, essays and pamphlets that have appeared

from the Canadian press during the first quarter of a century since the

Dominion of Canada has been in existence, the number would astonish

many persons who have not followed our literary activity. Of course

the greater part of this work is ephemeral in its character and has

no special value; much of the historical work is a dreary collection

of facts and dates which shows the enterprise of school publishers

and school teachers and is generally wanting in that picturesqueness

and breadth of view which give interest to history and leave a vivid

impression on the mind of the student. Most of these pamphlets have

been written on religious, political or legal questions of the day.

Many of the poems illustrate rather the aspirations of the school boy

or maiden whose effusions generally appeared in the poet's corner

of the village newspaper. Still there are even among these mere

literary "transients" evidences of power of incisive argument and

of some literary style. In fact, all the scientific, historical and

poetical contributions of the period in question, make up quite a

library of Canadian literature. And here let me observe in passing,

some persons still suppose that _belles-lettres_, works of fiction,

poetry and criticism, alone constitute literature. The word can take

in its complete sense a very wide range, for it embraces the pamphlet

or monograph on the most abstruse scientific, or mathematical or

geographical or physical subject, as well as the political essay, the

brilliant history, or the purely imaginative poem or novel. It is not

so much the subject as the form and style which make them worthy of a

place in literature. One of the most remarkable books ever written,

the "Esprit des Lois" by Montesquieu, has won the highest place in

literature by its admirable style, and in the science of politics

by the importance of its matter. The works of Lyell, Huxley, Hunt,

Dawson, Tyndall, and Darwin owe their great value not entirely to the

scientific ideas and principles and problems there discussed, but also

to the lucidity of style in which the whole subject is presented to

the reader, whether versed or not in science. "Literature is a large

word," says Matthew Arnold,[52] discussing with Tyndall this very

subject; "it may mean everything written with letters or printed in a

book. Euclid's Elements and Newton's Principia are thus literature.

All knowledge that reaches us through books is literature. But as I

do not mean, by knowing ancient Rome, knowing merely more or less

of Latin _belles-lettres_, and taking no account of Rome's military,

and political, and legal, and administrative work in the world; and

as, by knowing ancient Greece, I understand knowing her as the giver

of Greek art, and the guide to a free and right use of reason and to

scientific methods, and the founder of our mathematics, and physics,

and astronomy, and biology, I understand knowing her as all this, and

not merely knowing certain Greek poems, and histories, and treatises

and speeches, so as to the knowledge of modern nations also. By knowing

modern nations, I mean not merely knowing their _belles-lettres_, but

knowing also what has been done by such men as Copernicus, Galileo,

Newton, Darwin." I submit this definition of literature by a great

English critic and poet who certainly knew what he was writing about,

to the studious consideration of Principal Grant who, in an address

to the Royal Society two years ago,[53] appeared to have some doubt

that much of its work could be called literature; a doubt that he

forgot for the moment actually consigned to a questionable level also

his many devious utterances and addresses on political, religious and

other questions of the day, and left him entirely out of the ranks

of _littérateurs_ and in a sort of limbo which is a world of neither

divinity, nor politics, nor letters. Taking this definition of the

bright apostle of English culture, I think Canadians can fairly claim

to have some position as a literary people even if it be a relatively

humble one, on account of the work done in history, _belles-lettres_,

political science and the sciences generally Science alone has had

in Canada for nearly half a century many votaries who have won for

themselves high distinction, as the eminent names on the list of

membership of the Royal Society since its foundation can conclusively

show. The literature of science, as studied and written by Canadians,

is remarkably comprehensive, and finds a place in every well furnished

library of the world.

The _doyen_ of science in Canada, Sir William Dawson,[54] we are

all glad to know, is still at work after a long and severe illness,

which was, no doubt, largely due to the arduous devotion of years to

education and science. It is not my intention to refer here to other

well-known names in scientific literature, but I may pause for an

instant to mention the fact that one of the earliest scientific writers

of eminence, who was a Canadian by birth and education, was Mr. Elkanah

Billings,[55] palæontologist and geologist, who contributed his first

papers to the _Citizen_ of Ottawa, then Bytown, afterwards to have

greatness thrown upon it and made the political capital of Canada.

Our Intellectual Strength and Weakness A Short Historical and Critical Review of Literature, Art and Education in Canada · 第 24 / 103 题