[1] The name La Chine was sarcastically applied to La Salle's
settlement on the St Lawrence.
[2] The Iroquois seem to have used the name Ohio for the Mississippi,
or at least for its lower part; and this circumstance makes the story
of La Salle's exploration peculiarly difficult to disentangle.
[3] Tonty (or Tonti), an Italian, born at Gaeta, was La Salle's
principal lieutenant, and was the equal of his chief in intrepidity.
Before his association with La Salle he had engaged in military
service in Europe, during which he had lost a hand. He accompanied La
Salle to the mouth of the Mississippi, and was in command of Fort St
Louis from the time of its erection until 1702, except during his
journeys down the Mississippi in search of his chief. In 1702 he
joined d'Iberville in lower Louisiana, and soon after was despatched
on a mission to the Chickasaw Indians. This is the last authentic
trace of him.
[4] Although La Salle and Don Diego de Peñalosa (1624-1687) presented
to the French government independent plans for an expedition against
the Spaniards and Peñalosa afterwards proposed their co-operation,
there is no substantial evidence that this project was adopted.
Parkman is of the opinion that La Salle proposed his expedition
against the Spaniards in the hope that the conclusion of peace
between France and Spain would prevent its execution and that he
might then use the aid he had thus received in establishing a
fortified commercial colony at the mouth of the Mississippi. See E.
T. Miller, "The Connection of Peñalosa with the La Salle Expedition,"
in the _Quarterly_ of the Texas State Historical Association, vol. v.
(Austin, Tex., 1902).
LA SALLE, ST JEAN BAPTISTE DE (1651-1719), founder of the order of
Christian Brothers, was born at Reims. The son of a rich lawyer, his
father's influence early secured him a canonry in the cathedral; there
he established a school, where free elementary instruction was given to
poor children. The enterprise soon broadened in scope; a band of
enthusiastic assistants gathered round him; he resolved to resign his
canonry, and devote himself entirely to education. His assistants were
organized into a community, which gradually rooted itself all over
France; and a training-school for teachers, the Collège de Saint-Yon,
was set up at Rouen. In 1725, six years after the founder's death, the
society was recognized by the pope, under the official title of
"Brothers of the Christian Schools"; its members took the usual monastic
vows, but did not aspire to the priesthood. During the first hundred
years of its existence its activities were mainly confined to France;
during the 19th century it spread to most of the countries of western
Europe, and has been markedly successful in the United States. When La
Salle was canonized in 1900, the total number of brothers was estimated
at 15,000. Although the order has been chiefly concerned with elementary
schools, it undertakes most branches of secondary and technical
education; and it has served as a model for other societies, in Ireland
and elsewhere, slightly differing in character from the original
institute.
LA SALLE, a city of La Salle county, Illinois, U.S.A., on the Illinois
river, near the head of navigation, 99 m. S.W. of Chicago. Pop. (1900)
10,446, of whom 3471 were foreign-born; (1910 census) 11,537. The city
is served by the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy, the Chicago, Rock Island
& Pacific, and the Illinois Central railways, and by the Illinois &
Michigan Canal, of which La Salle is the western terminus. The city has
a public library. The principal industries are the smelting of zinc and
the manufacture of cement, rolled zinc, bricks, sulphuric acid and
clocks; in 1905 the city's factory products were valued at $3,158,173.
In the vicinity large quantities of coal are mined, for which the city
is an important shipping point. The municipality owns and operates the
waterworks and the electric lighting plant. The first settlement was
made here in 1830; and the place which was named in honour of the
explorer, René Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle, was chartered as a
city in 1852 and rechartered in 1876.
LASAULX, ARNOLD CONSTANTIN PETER FRANZ VON (1839-1886), German
mineralogist and petrographer, was born at Castellaun near Coblenz on
the 14th of June 1839. He was educated at Berlin, where he took his Ph.
D. in 1868. In 1875 he became professor of mineralogy at Breslau, and in
1880 professor of mineralogy and geology at Bonn. He was distinguished
for his researches on minerals and on crystallography, and he was one of
the earlier workers on microscopic petrography. He described in 1878 the
eruptive rocks of the district of Saar and Moselle. In 1880 he edited
_Der Aetna_ from the MSS. of Dr W. Sartorius von Waltershausen, the
results of observations made between the years 1834-1869. He was author
of _Elemente der Petrographie_ (1875), _Einführung in die Gesteinslehre_
(1885), and _Précis de pétrographie_ (1887). He died at Bonn on the 25th
of January 1886.
LASCAR, the name in common use for all oriental, and especially Indian,
sailors, which has been adopted in England into the Merchant Shipping
Acts, though without any definition. It is derived from the Persian
_lashkar_ = army, or camp, in which sense it is still used in India,
e.g. Lashkar, originally the camp, now the permanent capital, of Sindhia
at Gwalior. It would seem to have been applied by the Portuguese, first
to an inferior class of men in military service (cf. "gun-lascars"), and
then to sailors as early as the 17th century. The form _askari_ on the
east coast of Africa, equivalent to "sepoy," comes from the Arabic
'_askar_ = army, which is believed to be itself taken from the Persian.
LASCARIS, CONSTANTINE (d. 1493 or 1500), Greek scholar and grammarian,
one of the promoters of the revival of Greek learning in Italy, was born
at Constantinople. He was a member of the noble Bithynian family, which
had furnished three emperors of Nicaea during the 13th century. After
the fall of Constantinople in 1453, he took refuge first in Corfu and
then in Italy, where Francesco Sforza, duke of Milan, appointed him
Greek tutor to his daughter. Here was published his _Grammatica Graeca,
sive compendium octo orationis partium_, remarkable as being the first
book entirely in Greek issued from the printing press. After leaving
Milan, Lascaris taught in Rome under the patronage of Cardinal
Bessarion, and in Naples, whither he had been summoned by Ferdinand I.
to deliver a course of lectures on Greece. Ultimately, on the invitation
of the inhabitants, he settled in Messina, Sicily, where he continued to
teach publicly until his death. Among his numerous pupils here was
Pietro Bembo. Lascaris bequeathed his library of valuable MSS. to the
senate of Messina; the collection was afterwards carried to Spain and
lodged in the Escurial.
The _Grammatica_, which has often been reprinted, is the only work of
value produced by Lascaris. Some of his letters are given by J.
Iriarte in the _Regiae Bibliothecae Matritensis codices Graeci
manuscripti_, i. (Madrid, 1769). His name is known to modern readers
in the romance of A. F. Villemain, _Lascaris, ou les Grecs du
quinzième siècle_ (1825). See also J. E. Sandys, _Hist. Class.
Schol._, ed. 2, vol. ii. (1908), pp. 76 foll.
LASCARIS, JOANNES [JOHN], or JANUS (c. 1445-1535), Greek scholar,
probably the younger brother of Constantine Lascaris, surnamed
Rhyndacenus from the river Rhyndacus in Bithynia, his native province.
After the fall of Constantinople he was taken to the Peloponnese, thence
to Crete, and ultimately found refuge in Florence at the court of
Lorenzo de' Medici, whose intermediary he was with the sultan Bayezid
II. in the purchase of Greek MSS. for the Medicean library. On the
expulsion of the Medici from Florence, at the invitation of Charles
VIII. of France, Lascaris removed to Paris (1495), where he gave public
instruction in Greek. By Louis XII. he was several times employed on
public missions, amongst others to Venice (1503-1508), and in 1515 he
appears to have accepted the invitation of Leo X. to take charge of the
Greek college he had founded at Rome. We afterwards (1518) find Lascaris
employed along with Budaeus (Budé) by Francis I. in the formation of the
royal library at Fontainebleau, and also again sent in the service of
the French crown to Venice. He died at Rome, whither he had been
summoned by Pope Paul III., in 1535. Among his pupils was Musurus.
Amongst other works, Lascaris edited or wrote: _Anthologia
epigrammatum Graecorum_ (1494), in which he ascribed the collection of
the Anthology to Agathias, not to Planudes; _Didymi Alexandrini
scholia in Iliadem_ (1517); Porphyrius of Tyre's _Homericarum
quaestionum liber_ (1518); _De veris Graecarum litterarum formis ac
causis apud antiquos_ (Paris, 1556). See H. Hody, _De Graecis
illustribus_ (London, 1742); W. Roscoe, _Life of Leo X._ ii. (1846);
C. F. Börner, _De doctis hominibus Graecis_ (Leipzig, 1750); A.
Horawitz in Ersch & Gruber's _Allgemeine Encyclopädie_; J. E. Sandys,
_Hist. Class. Schol._, ed. 2, vols. ii. (1908), p. 78.
LAS CASAS, BARTOLOMÉ DE (1474-1566), for some time bishop of Chiapa in
Mexico, and known to posterity as "The Apostle of the Indies," was a
native of Seville. His father, one of the companions of Columbus in the
voyage which resulted in the discovery of the New World, sent him to
Salamanca, where he graduated. In 1498 he accompanied his father in an
expedition under Columbus to the West Indies, and in 1502 he went with
Nicolás de Ovando, the governor, to Hayti, where in 1510 he was admitted
to holy orders, being the first priest ordained in the American
colonies. In 1511 he passed over to Cuba to take part in the work of
"population and pacification," and in 1513 or 1514 he witnessed and
vainly endeavoured to check the massacre of Indians at Caonao. Soon
afterwards there was assigned to him and his friend Renteria a large
village in the neighbourhood of Zagua, with a number of Indians attached
to it in what was known as _repartimiento_ (allotment); like the rest of
his countrymen he made the most of this opportunity for growing rich,
but occasionally celebrated mass and preached. Soon, however, having
become convinced of the injustice connected with the _repartimiento_
system, he began to preach against it, at the same time giving up his
own slaves. With the consent of his partner he resolved to go to Spain
on behalf of the oppressed natives, and the result of his
representations was that in 1516 Cardinal Jimenes caused a commission to
be sent out for the reform of abuses, Las Casas himself, with the title
of "protector of the Indians," being appointed to advise and report on
them. This commission had not been long at San Domingo before Las Casas
perceived the indifference of his coadjutors to the cause which he
himself had at heart, and July 1517 found him again in Spain, where he
developed his scheme for the complete liberation of the Indians--a
scheme which not only included facilities for emigration from Spain, but
was intended to give to each Spanish resident in the colonies the right
of importing twelve negro slaves. The emigration movement proved a
failure, and Las Casas lived long enough to express his shame for having
been so slow to see that Africans were as much entitled to freedom as
were the natives of the New World. Overwhelmed with disappointment, he
retired to the Dominican monastery in Haiti; he joined the order in 1522
and devoted eight years to study. About 1530 he appears to have
revisited the Spanish court, but on what precise errand is not known;
the confusion concerning this period of his life extends to the time
when, after visits to Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru and Guatemala, he
undertook an expedition in 1537 into Tuzulutlan, the inhabitants of
which were, chiefly through his tact, peaceably converted to
Christianity, mass being celebrated for the first time amongst them in
the newly founded town of Rabinal in 1538. In 1539 Las Casas was sent to
Spain to obtain Dominican recruits, and through Loaysa, general of the
order, and confessor of Charles V., he was successful in obtaining royal
orders and letters favouring his enterprise. During this stay in Europe,
which lasted more than four years, he visited Germany to see the
emperor; he also (1542) wrote his _Veynte Razones_, in defence of the
liberties of the Indians and the _Brevisima Relacion de la Destruycion
des las Indias occidentales_, the latter of which was published some
twelve years later. In 1543 he refused the Mexican bishopric of Cuzco,
but was prevailed upon to accept that of Chiapa, for which he sailed in
1544. Thwarted at every point by the officials, and outraged by his
countrymen in his attempt to carry out the new laws which his humanity
had procured, he returned to Spain and resigned his dignity (1547). In
1550 he met Sepúlveda in public debate on the theses drawn from the
recently published _Apologia pro libro de justis belli causis_, in which
the latter had maintained the lawfulness of waging unprovoked war upon
the natives of the New World. The course of the discussion may be traced
in the account of the _Disputa_ contained in the _Obras_ (1552). In 1565
Las Casas successfully remonstrated with Philip II. against the
financial project for selling the reversion of the _encomiendas_--a
project which would have involved the Indians in hopeless bondage. In
July of the following year he died at Madrid, whither he had gone to
urge (and with success) the necessity of restoring a court of justice
which had been suppressed in Guatemala. His _Historia de las Indias_ was
not published till 1875-1876.
Sir Arthur Helps' _Life of Las Casas_ (London, 1868) has not been
superseded; but see also F. A. MacNutt, _Bartholomew de Las Casas_
(1909).
LAS CASES, EMMANUEL AUGUSTIN DIEUDONNÉ MARIN JOSEPH, MARQUIS
(1766-1842), French official, was born at the castle of Las Cases near
Revel in Languedoc. He was educated at the military schools of Vendôme
and Paris; he entered the navy and took part in various engagements of
the years 1781-1782. The outbreak of the Revolution in 1789 caused him
to "emigrate," and he spent some years in Germany and England, sharing
in the disastrous Quiberon expedition (1795). He was one of the few
survivors and returned to London, where he lived in poverty. He returned
to France during the Consulate with other royalists who rallied to the
side of Napoleon, and stated afterwards to the emperor that he was
"conquered by his glory." Not until 1810 did he receive much notice from
Napoleon, who then made him a chamberlain and created him a count of the
empire (he was marquis by hereditary right). After the first abdication
of the emperor (11th of April 1814), Las Cases retired to England, but
returned to serve Napoleon during the Hundred Days. The second
abdication opened up for Las Cases the most noteworthy part of his
career. He withdrew with the ex-emperor and a few other trusty followers
to Rochefort; and it was Las Cases who first proposed and strongly urged
the emperor to throw himself on the generosity of the British nation.
Las Cases made the first overtures to Captain Maitland of H.M.S.
"Bellerophon" and received a guarded reply, the nature of which he
afterwards misrepresented. Las Cases accompanied the ex-emperor to St
Helena and acted informally but very assiduously as his secretary,
taking down numerous notes of his conversations which thereafter took
form in the famous _Mémorial de Ste Hélène_. The limits of this article
preclude an attempt at assessing the value of this work. It should be
read with great caution, as the compiler did not scruple to insert his
own thoughts and to colour the expressions of his master. In some cases
he misstated facts and even fabricated documents. It is far less
trustworthy than the record penned by Gourgaud in his _Journal_.
Disliked by Montholon and Gourgaud, Las Cases seems to have sought an
opportunity to leave the island when he had accumulated sufficient
literary material. However that may be, he infringed the British
regulations in such a way as to lead to his expulsion by the governor,
Sir Hudson Lowe (November, 1816). He was sent first to the Cape of Good
Hope and thence to Europe, but was not at first allowed by the
government of Louis XVIII. to enter France. He resided at Brussels; but,
gaining permission to come to Paris after the death of Napoleon, he took
up his residence there, published the _Mémorial_, and soon gained an
enormous sum from it. He died in 1842 at Passy.
See _Mémoires de E. A. D., comte de Las Cases_ (Brussels, 1818);
_Mémorial de Ste Hélène_ (4 vols., London and Paris, 1823; often
republished and translated); _Suite au mémorial de Ste Hélène, ou
observations critiques_, &c. (2 vols., Paris, 1824), anonymous, but
known to be by Grille and Musset-Pathay. See too GOURGAUD, MONTHOLON,
and LOWE, SIR HUDSON. (J. Hl. R.)
LASHIO, the headquarters of the superintendent, northern Shan States,
Burma, situated in 22° 56´ N. and 97° 45´ E. at an altitude of 3100 ft.,
on a low spur overlooking the valley of the Nam Yao. It is the present
terminus of the Mandalay-Kun Long railway and of the government cart
road from Mandalay, from which it is 178 m. distant. It consists of the
European station, with court house and quarters for the civil officers;
the military police post, the headquarters of the Lashio battalion of
military police; the native station, in which the various nationalities,
Shans, Burmans, Hindus and Mahommedans, are divided into separate
quarters, with reserves for government servants and for the temporary
residences of the five sawbwas of the northern Shan States; and a
bazaar. Under Burmese rule Lashio was also the centre of authority for
the northern Shan States, but the Burmese post in the valley was close
to the Nam Yao, in an old Chinese fortified camp. The Lashio valley was
formerly very populous; but a rebellion, started by the sawbwa of
Hsenwi, about ten years before the British occupation, ruined it, and it
is only slowly approaching the prosperity it formerly enjoyed; pop.
(1901) 2565. The annual rainfall averages 54 in. The average maximum
temperature is 80.5° and the average minimum 55.5°.
LASKER, EDUARD (1829-1884), German publicist, was born on the 14th of
October 1829, at Jarotschin, a village in Posen, being the son of a
Jewish tradesman. He attended the gymnasium, and afterwards the
university of Breslau. In 1848, after the outbreak of the revolution, he
went to Vienna and entered the students' legion which took so prominent
a part in the disturbances; he fought against the imperial troops during
the siege of the city in October. He then continued his legal studies at
Breslau and Berlin, and after a visit of three years to England, then
the model state for German liberals, entered the Prussian judicial
service. In 1870 he left the government service, and in 1873 was
appointed to an administrative post in the service of the city of
Berlin. He had been brought to the notice of the political world by some
articles he wrote from 1861 to 1864, which were afterwards published
under the title _Zur Verfassungsgeschichte Preussens_ (Leipzig, 1874),
and in 1865 he was elected member for one of the divisions of Berlin in
the Prussian parliament. He joined the radical or _Fortschritts_ party,
and in 1867 was also elected to the German parliament, but he helped to
form the national liberal party, and in consequence lost his seat in
Berlin, which remained faithful to the radicals; after this he
represented Magdeburg and Frankfort-on-Main in the Prussian, and
Meiningen in the German, parliament. He threw himself with great energy
into his parliamentary duties, and quickly became one of its most
popular and most influential members. An optimist and idealist, he
joined to a fervent belief in liberty an equal enthusiasm for German
unity and the idea of the German state. His motion that Baden should be
included in the North German Confederation in January 1870 caused much
embarrassment to Bismarck, but was not without effect in hastening the
crisis of 1870. His great work, however, was the share he took in the
judicial reform during the ten years 1867-1877. To him more than to any
other single individual is due the great codification of the law. While
he again and again was able to compel the government to withdraw or
amend proposals which seemed dangerous to liberty, he opposed those
liberals who, unable to obtain all the concessions which they called
for, refused to vote for the new laws as a whole. A speech made by
Lasker on the 7th of February 1873, in which he attacked the management
of the Pomeranian railway, caused a great sensation, and his exposure of
the financial mismanagement brought about the fall of Hermann Wagener,
one of Bismarck's most trusted assistants. By this action he caused,
however, some embarrassment to his party. This is generally regarded as
the beginning of the reaction against economic liberalism by which he
and his party were to be deprived of their influence. He refused to
follow Bismarck in his financial and economic policy after 1878; always
unsympathetic to the chancellor, he was now selected for his most bitter
attacks. Between the radicals and socialists on the one side and the
government on the other, like many of his friends, he was unable to
maintain himself. In 1879 he lost his seat in the Prussian parliament;
he joined the _Sezession_, but was ill at ease in his new position.
Broken in health and spirits by the incessant labours of the time when
he did "half the work of the Reichstag," he went in 1883 for a tour in
America, and died suddenly in New York on the 5th of January 1884.
Lasker's death was the occasion of a curious episode, which caused
much discussion at the time. The American House of Representatives
adopted a motion of regret, and added to it these words: "That his
loss is not alone to be mourned by the people of his native land,
where his firm and constant exposition of, and devotion to, free and
liberal ideas have materially advanced the social, political and
economic conditions of these people, but by the lovers of liberty
throughout the world." This motion was sent through the American
minister at Berlin to the German foreign office, with a request that
it might be communicated to the president of the Reichstag. It was to
ask Bismarck officially to communicate a resolution in which a foreign
parliament expressed an opinion in German affairs exactly opposed to
that which the emperor at his advice had always followed. Bismarck
therefore refused to communicate the resolution, and returned it
through the German minister at Washington.
Among Lasker's writings may be mentioned: _Zur Geschichte der
parlamentarischen Entwickelung Preussens_ (Leipzig, 1873), _Die
Zukunft des Deutschen Reichs_ (Leipzig, 1877) and _Wege und Ziele der_
_Kulturentwickelung_ (Leipzig, 1881). After his death his _Fünfzehn
Jahre parlamentarischer Geschichte 1866-1880_ appeared edited by W.
Cahn (Berlin, 1902). See also L. Bamberger, _Eduard Lasker,
Gedenkrede_ (Leipzig, 1884); A. Wolff, _Zur Erinnerung an Eduard
Lasker_ (Berlin, 1884); Freund, _Einiges über Eduard Lasker_ (Leipzig,
1885); and _Eduard Lasker, seine Biographie und letzte öffentliche
Rede_, by various writers (Stuttgart, 1884). (J. W. He.)
LASKI, the name of a noble and powerful Polish family, is taken from the
town of Lask, the seat of their lordship.
JAN LASKI, the elder (1456-1531), Polish statesman and ecclesiastic,
appears to have been largely self-taught and to have owed everything to
the remarkable mental alertness which was hereditary in the Laski
family. He took orders betimes, and in 1495 was secretary to the Polish
chancellor Zawisza Kurozwecki, in which position he acquired both
influence and experience. The aged chancellor entrusted the sharp-witted
young ecclesiastic with the conduct of several important missions.
Twice, in 1495 and again in 1500, he was sent to Rome, and once on a
special embassy to Flanders, of which he has left an account. On these
occasions he had the opportunity of displaying diplomatic talent of a
high order. On the accession to the Polish throne in 1501 of the
indolent Alexander, who had little knowledge of Polish affairs and
chiefly resided in Lithuania, Laski was appointed by the senate the
king's secretary, in which capacity he successfully opposed the growing
separatist tendencies of the grand-duchy and maintained the influence of
Catholicism, now seriously threatened there by the Muscovite propaganda.
So struck was the king by his ability that on the death of the Polish
chancellor in 1503 he passed over the vice-chancellor Macics Dzewicki
and confided the great seal to Laski. As chancellor Laski supported the
_szlachta_, or country-gentlemen, against the lower orders, going so far
as to pass an edict excluding henceforth all plebeians from the higher
benefices of the church. Nevertheless he approved himself such an
excellent public servant that the new king, Sigismund I., made him one
of his chief counsellors. In 1511 the chancellor, who ecclesiastically
was still only a canon of Cracow, obtained the coveted dignity of
archbishop of Gnesen which carried with it the primacy of the Polish
church. In the long negotiations with the restive and semi-rebellious
Teutonic Order, Laski rendered Sigismund most important political
services, proposing as a solution of the question that Sigismund should
be elected grand master, while he, Laski, should surrender the primacy
to the new candidate of the knights, Albert of Brandenburg, a solution
which would have been far more profitable to Poland than the ultimate
settlement of 1525. In 1513 Laski was sent to the Lateran council,
convened by Pope Julius II., to plead the cause of Poland against the
knights, where both as an orator and as a diplomatist he brilliantly
distinguished himself. This mission was equally profitable to his
country and himself, and he succeeded in obtaining from the pope for the
archbishops of Gnesen the title of _legati nati_. In his old age Laski's
partiality for his nephew, Hieronymus, led him to support the
candidature of John Zapolya, the protégé of the Turks, for the Hungarian
crown so vehemently against the Habsburgs that Clement VII.
excommunicated him, and the shock of this disgrace was the cause of his
sudden death in 1531. Of his numerous works the most noteworthy are his
collection of Polish statutes entitled: _Statuta provinciae gnesnensis
antiqua, &c._ (Cracow, 1525-1528) and _De Ruthenorum nationibus eorumque
erroribus_, printed at Nuremberg.
See Heinrich R. von Zeissberg, _Joh. Laski, Erzbischof in Gnesen_
(Vienna, 1874); and Jan Korytkowski, _Jan Laski, Archbishop of Gnesen_
(Gnesen, 1880).
HIERONYMUS JAROSLAW LASKI (1496-1542), Polish diplomatist, nephew of
Archbishop Laski, was successively palatine of Inowroclaw and of
Sieradia. His first important mission was to Paris in 1524, ostensibly
to contract an anti-Turkish league with the French king, but really to
bring about a matrimonial alliance between the dauphin, afterwards Henry
II., and the daughter of King Sigismund I., a project which failed
through no fault of Laski's. The collapse of the Hungarian monarchy at
Mohacs (1526) first opened up a wider career to Laski's adventurous
activity. Contrary to the wishes of his own sovereign, Sigismund I.,
whose pro-Austrian policy he detested, Laski entered the service of John
Zapolya, the Magyar competitor for the Hungarian throne, thereby
seriously compromising Poland both with the emperor and the pope.
Zapolya despatched him on an embassy to Paris, Copenhagen and Munich for
help, but on his return he found his patron a refugee in Transylvania,
whither he had retired after his defeat by the German king Ferdinand I.
at Tokay in 1527. In his extremity Zapolya placed himself under the
protection of the sultan, Laski being sent to Constantinople as his
intermediary. On his way thither he was attacked and robbed of
everything, including his credentials and the rich presents without
which no negotiations were deemed possible at the Porte. But Laski was
nothing if not audacious. Proceeding on his way to the Turkish capital
empty-handed, he nevertheless succeeded in gaining the confidence of
Gritti, the favourite of the grand vizier, and ultimately persuaded the
sultan to befriend Zapolya and to proclaim him king of Hungary. He went
still further, and without the slightest authority for his action
concluded a ten years' truce between his old master King Sigismund of
Poland and the Porte. He then returned to Hungary at the head of 10,000
men, with whose aid he enabled Zapolya to re-establish his position and
defeat Ferdinand at Saros-Patak. He was rewarded with the countship of
Zips and the governor-generalship of Transylvania. But his influence
excited the jealousy of the Magyars, and Zapolya was persuaded to
imprison him. On being released by the interposition of the Polish grand
hetman, Tarnowski, he became the most violent opponent of Zapolya.
Shortly after his return to Poland, Laski died suddenly at Cracow,
probably poisoned by one of his innumerable enemies.
See Alexander Hirschberg, _Hieronymus Laski_ (Pol.) (Lemberg, 1888).
JAN LASKI, the younger (1499-1560), also known as _Johannes a Lasco_,
Polish reformer, son of Jaroslaw (d. 1523), voivode of Sieradia and
nephew of the famous Archbishop Laski. During his academical course
abroad he made the acquaintance of Zwingli and Erasmus and returned to
Poland in 1526 saturated with the new doctrines. Nevertheless he took
orders, and owing to the influence of his uncle obtained the bishopric
of Veszprem in Hungary from King John Zapolya, besides holding a canonry
of Cracow and the office of royal secretary. In 1531 he resigned all his
benefices rather than give up a woman whom he had secretly married, and
having incurred general reprobation and the lasting displeasure of his
uncle the archbishop, he fled to Germany, where ultimately (1543) he
adopted the Augsburg Confession. For the next thirteen years Laski was a
wandering apostle of the new doctrines. He was successively
superintendent at Emden and in Friesland, passed from thence to London
where he became a member of the so-called _ecclesia peregrinorum_, a
congregation of foreign Protestants exiled in consequence of the
Augsburg Interim of 1548 and, on being expelled by Queen Mary, took
refuge first in Denmark and subsequently at Frankfort-on-Main, where he
was greatly esteemed. From Frankfort he addressed three letters (printed
at Basel) to King Sigismund, Augustus, and the Polish gentry and people,
urging the conversion of Poland to Protestantism. In 1556, during the
brief triumph of the anti-catholics, he returned to his native land,
took part in the synod of Brzesc, and published a number of polemical
works, the most noteworthy of which were _Forma ac ratio tota
ecclesiastici ministerii in peregrinorum Ecclesiae instituta_ (Pinczow,
1560), and in Polish, _History of the Cruel Persecution of the Church of
God in 1567_, republished in his _Opera_, edited by A. Kuyper at
Amsterdam in 1866. He died at Pinczow in January 1560 and was buried
with great pomp by the Polish Protestants, who also struck a medal in
his honour. Twice married, he left two sons and two daughters. His
nephew (?) Albert Laski, who visited England in 1583, wasted a fortune
in aid of Dr Dee's craze for the "philosopher's stone." Laski's writings
are important for the organization of the _ecclesia peregrinorum_, and
he was concerned in the Polish version of the Bible, not published till
1563.
See H. Dalton, _Johannes a Lasco_ (1881), English version of the
earlier portion by J. Evans (1886); Bartels, _Johannes a Lasco_
(1860); Harboe, _Schicksale des Johannes a Lasco_ (1758); R. Wallace,
_Antitrinitarian Biography_ (1850); Bonet-Maury, _Early Sources of
Eng. Unit. Christianity_ (1884); W. A. J. Archbold in _Dict. Nat.
Biog._ (1892) under "Laski," George Pascal, _Jean de Lasco_ (Paris,
1894); _Life_ in Polish by Antoni Walewski (Warsaw, 1872); and Julian
Bukowski, _History of the Reformation in Poland_ (Pol.) (Cracow,
1883). (R. N. B.)
LAS PALMAS, the capital of the Spanish island of Grand Canary, in the
Canary archipelago, and of an administrative district which also
comprises the islands of Lanzarote and Fuerteventura; on the east coast,
in 28° 7´ N. and 5° 24´ W. Pop. (1900) 44,517. Las Palmas is the largest
city in the Canary Islands, of which it was the capital until 1833. It
is the seat of a court of appeal, of a brigadier, who commands the
military forces in the district, of a civil lieutenant-governor, who is
independent of the governor-general except in connexion with elections
and municipal administration, and of a bishop, who is subordinate to the
archbishop of Seville. The palms from which the city derives its name
are still characteristic of the fertile valley which it occupies. Las
Palmas is built on both banks of a small river, and although parts of it
date from the 16th century, it is on the whole a clean and modern city,
well drained, and supplied with pure water, conveyed by an aqueduct from
the highlands of the interior. Its principal buildings include a
handsome cathedral, founded in the 16th century but only completed in
the 19th, a theatre, a museum, an academy of art, and several hospitals
and good schools. The modern development of Las Palmas is largely due to
the foreign merchants, and especially to the British who control the
greater portion of the local commerce. La Luz, the port, is connected
with Las Palmas by a railway 4 m. long; it is a free port and harbour of
refuge, officially considered the third in importance of Spanish ports,
but actually the first in the matter of tonnage. It is strongly
fortified. The harbour, protected by the promontory of La Isleta, which
is connected with the mainland by a narrow bar of sand, can accommodate
the largest ships, and affords secure anchorage in all weathers. Ships
can discharge at the breakwater (1257 yds. long) or at the Santa
Catalina mole, constructed in 1883-1902. The minimum depth of water
alongside the quays is 4½ ft. There are floating water-tanks, numerous
lighters, titan and other cranes, repairing workshops, and very large
supplies of coal afloat and ashore. La Luz is one of the principal
Atlantic coaling stations, and the coal-trade is entirely in British
hands. Other important industries are shipbuilding, fishing, and the
manufacture of glass, leather and hats. The chief exports are fruit,
vegetables, sugar, wine and cochineal; coal, iron, cement, timber,
petroleum, manure, textiles and provisions are the chief imports. (See
also CANARY ISLANDS.)
LASSALLE, FERDINAND (1825-1864), German socialist, was born at Breslau
on the 11th of April 1825, of Jewish extraction. His father, a
prosperous merchant in Breslau, intended Ferdinand for a business
career, and sent him to the commercial school at Leipzig; but the boy
got himself transferred to the university, first at Breslau, and
afterwards at Berlin. His favourite studies were philology and
philosophy; he became an ardent Hegelian. Having completed his
university studies in 1845, he began to write a work on Heraclitus from
the Hegelian point of view; but it was soon interrupted by more stirring
interests, and did not see the light for many years. It was in Berlin,
towards the end of 1845, that he met the lady with whom his life was to
be associated in so remarkable a way, the Countess Hatzfeldt. She had
been separated from her husband for many years, and was at feud with him
on questions of property and the custody of their children. Lassalle
attached himself to the cause of the countess, whom he believed to have
been outrageously wronged, made special study of law, and, after
bringing the case before thirty-six tribunals, reduced the powerful
count to a compromise on terms most favourable to his client. The
process, which lasted ten years, gave rise to not a little scandal,
especially that of the _Cassettengeschichte_ which pursued Lassalle all
the rest of his life. This "affair of the casket" arose out of an
attempt by the countess's friends to get possession of a bond for a
large life annuity settled by the count on his mistress, a Baroness
Meyendorf, to the prejudice of the countess and her children. Two of
Lassalle's comrades succeeded in carrying off the casket, which
contained the lady's jewels, from the baroness's room at an hotel in
Cologne. They were prosecuted for theft, one of them being condemned to
six months' imprisonment. Lassalle, accused of moral complicity, was
acquitted on appeal. He was not so fortunate in 1849, when he underwent
a year's durance for resistance to the authorities of Düsseldorf during
the troubles of that stormy period. But going to prison was a familiar
experience in Lassalle's life. Till 1859 Lassalle resided mostly in the
Rhine country, prosecuting the suit of the countess, finishing the work
on Heraclitus, which was not published till 1858, taking little part in
political agitation, but ever a helpful friend of the working men. He
was not allowed to live in Berlin because of his connexion with the
disturbances of '48. In 1859, however, he entered the city disguised as
a carter, and, through the influence of Humboldt with the king, got
permission to stay there. The same year he published a remarkable
pamphlet on the _Italian War and the Mission of Prussia_, in which he
warned his countrymen against going to the rescue of Austria in her war
with France. He pointed out that if France drove Austria out of Italy
she might annex Savoy, but could not prevent the restoration of Italian
unity under Victor Emmanuel. France was doing the work of Germany by
weakening Austria; Prussia should form an alliance with France to drive
out Austria and make herself supreme in Germany. After their realization
by Bismarck these ideas have become sufficiently commonplace; but they
were nowise obvious when thus published by Lassalle. In 1861 he
published a great work in two volumes, _System der erworbenen Rechte_
(_System of Acquired Rights_).
Now began the short-lived activity which was to give him an historical
significance. It was early in 1862, when the struggle of Bismarck with
the Prussian liberals was already begun. Lassalle, a democrat of the
most advanced type, saw that an opportunity had come for asserting a
third great cause--that of the working men--which would outflank the
liberalism of the middle classes, and might even command the sympathy of
the government. His political programme was, however, entirely
subordinate to the social, that of bettering the condition of the
working classes, for which he believed the schemes of Schulze-Delitzsch
were utterly inadequate. Lassalle flung himself into the career of
agitator with his accustomed vigour. His worst difficulties were with
the working men themselves, among whom he met the most discouraging
apathy. His mission as organizer and emancipator of the working class
lasted only two years and a half. In that period he issued about twenty
separate publications, most of them speeches and pamphlets, but one of
them, that against Schulze-Delitzsch, a considerable treatise, and all
full of keen and vigorous thought. He founded the "Allgemeiner Deutscher
Arbeiterverein," was its president and almost single-handed champion,
conducted its affairs, and carried on a vast correspondence, not to
mention about a dozen state prosecutions in which he was during that
period involved. Berlin, Leipzig, Frankfort and the industrial centres
on the Rhine were the chief scenes of his activity. His greatest success
was on the Rhine, where in the summers of 1863 and 1864 his travels as
missionary of the new gospel resembled a triumphal procession. The
agitation was growing rapidly, but he had achieved little substantial
success when a most unworthy death closed his career.
While posing as the messiah of the poor, Lassalle was a man of decidedly
fashionable and luxurious habits. His suppers were well known as among
the most exquisite in Berlin. It was the most piquant feature of his
life that he, one of the gilded youth, a connoisseur in wines, and a
learned man to boot, had become agitator and the champion of the working
man. In one of the literary and fashionable circles of Berlin he had met
a Fräulein von Dönniges, for whom he at once felt a passion, which was
ardently reciprocated. In the summer of 1864 he met her again on the
Rigi, when they resolved to marry. She was a young lady of twenty,
decidedly unconventional and original in character, but the daughter of
a Bavarian diplomatist then resident at Geneva, who would have nothing
to do with Lassalle. The lady was imprisoned in her own room, and soon,
apparently under the influence of very questionable pressure, renounced
Lassalle in favour of another admirer, a Wallachian, Count von
Racowitza. Lassalle sent a challenge both to the lady's father and her
betrothed, which was accepted by the latter. At the Carouge, a suburb of
Geneva, the meeting took place on the morning of August 28, 1864, when
Lassalle was mortally wounded, and he died on the 31st of August. In
spite of such a foolish ending, his funeral was that of a martyr, and by
many of his adherents he has been regarded since with feelings almost of
religious devotion.
Lassalle did not lay claim to any special originality as a socialistic
thinker, nor did he publish any systematic statement of his views. Yet
his leading ideas are sufficiently clear and simple. Like a true
Hegelian he saw three stages in the development of labour: the ancient
and feudal period, which, through the subjection of the labourer,
sought solidarity without freedom; the reign of capital and the middle
classes, established in 1789, which sought freedom by destroying
solidarity; and the new era, beginning in 1848, which would reconcile
solidarity with freedom by introducing the principle of association.
It was the basis and starting-point of his opinions that, under the
empire of capital and so long as the working man was merely a receiver
of wages, no improvement in his condition could be expected. This
position he founded on the law of wages formulated by Ricardo, and
accepted by all the leading economists, that wages are controlled by
the ordinary relations of supply and demand, that a rise in wages
leads to an increase in the labouring population, which, by increasing
the supply of labour, is followed by a corresponding fall of wages.
Thus population increases or decreases in fixed relation to the rise
or fall of wages. The condition of the working man will never
permanently rise above the mere standard of living required for his
subsistence, and the continued supply of his kind. Lassalle held that
the co-operative schemes of Schulze-Delitzsch on the principle of
"self-help" were utterly inadequate, for the obvious reason that the
working classes were destitute of capital. The struggle of the working
man helping himself with his empty pockets against the capitalists he
compared to a battle with teeth and nails against modern artillery. In
short, Lassalle accepted the orthodox political economy to show that
the inevitable operation of its laws left no hope for the working
classes, and that no remedy could be found but by abolishing the
conditions in which these laws had their validity--in other words, by
abolishing the present relations of labour and capital altogether. And
this could only be done by the productive association of the working
men with money provided by the state. And he held that such
association should be the voluntary act of the working men, the
government merely reserving the right to examine the books of the
various societies. All the arrangements should be carried out
according to the rules of business usually followed in such
transactions. But how move the government to grant such a loan? Simply
by introducing (direct) universal suffrage. The working men were an
overwhelming majority; they were the state, and should control the
government. The aim of Lassalle, then, was to organize the working
classes into a great political power, which in the way thus indicated,
by peaceful resolute agitation, without violence or insurrection,
might attain the goal of productive association. In this way the
fourth estate would be emancipated from the despotism of the
capitalist, and a great step taken in the solution of the great
"social question."
It will be seen that the net result of Lassalle's life was to produce
a European scandal, and to originate a socialistic movement in
Germany, which, at the election of 1903, returned to the Reichstag
eighty-one members and polled 3,010,771 votes, and at the election of
1907 returned forty-three members and polled 3,258,968 votes. (The
diminution in the number of members returned in 1907 was due mostly to
combination among the different political groups.) This result, great
as it was, would hardly have been commensurate with his ambition,
which was boundless. In the heyday of his passion for Fräulein von
Dönniges, his dream was to be enthroned as the president of the German
republic with her seated at his side. With his energy, ability and
gift of dominating and organizing, he might indeed have done a great
deal. Bismarck coquetted with him as the representative of a force
that might help him to combat the Prussian liberals; in 1878, in a
speech before the Reichstag, he spoke of him with deep respect, as a
man of the greatest amiability and ability from whom much could be
learned. Even Bishop Ketteler of Mainz had declared his sympathy for
the cause he advocated.
Lassalle's _Die Philosophie Herakleitos des Dunklen von Ephesos_
(Berlin, 1858), and the _System der erworbenen Rechte_ (Leipzig, 1861)
are both marked by great learning and intellectual power. But of far
more historical interest are the speeches and pamphlets connected with
his socialistic agitation, of which the most important are--_Ueber
Verfassungswesen_; _Arbeiterprogramm_; _Offenes Antwortschreiben_;
_Zur Arbeiterfrage_; _Arbeiterlesebuch_; _Herr Bastiat-Schulze von
Delitzsch, oder Kapital und Arbeit_. His drama, _Franz von Sickingen_,
published in 1859, is a work of no poetic value. His _Collected Works_
were issued at Leipzig in 1899-1901.
The best biography of Lassalle is H. Oncken's _Lassalle_ (Stuttgart,
1904); another excellent work on his life and writings is George
Brandes's Danish work, _Ferdinand Lassalle_ (German translation, 4th
ed., Leipzig, 1900). See also A. Aaberg, _Ferdinand Lassalle_
(Leipzig, 1883); C. v. Plener, _Lassalle_ (Leipzig, 1884); G. Meyer,
_Lassalle als Sozialökonom_ (Berlin, 1894); Brandt, _F. Lassalles
sozialökonomische Anschauungen und praktische Vorschläge_ (Jena,
1895); Seillière, _Études sur Ferdinand Lassalle_ (Paris, 1897); E.
Bernstein, _Ferd. Lassalle und seine Bedeutung für die Arbeiterklasse_
(Berlin, 1904). There is a considerable literature on his love affair
and death; the most notable books are: _Meine Beziehungen zu F.
Lassalle_, by Helene von Racowitza, a very strange book; _Enthüllungen
über das tragische Lebensende F. Lassalle's_ by B. Becker; _Im
Anschluss an die Memoiren der H. von Racowitza_, by A. Kutschbach, and
George Meredith's _Tragic Comedians_ (1880). (T. K.)
LASSEN, CHRISTIAN (1800-1876), German orientalist, was born on the 22nd
of October 1800, at Bergen in Norway. Having received his earliest
university education at Christiania, he went to Germany, and continued
his studies at Heidelberg and Bonn. In the latter university Lassen
acquired a sound knowledge of Sanskrit. He next spent three years in
Paris and London, engaged in copying and collating MSS., and collecting
materials for future research, especially in reference to the Hindu
drama and philosophy. During this period he published, jointly with E.
Burnouf, his first work, _Essai sur le Pâli_ (Paris, 1826). On his
return to Bonn he studied Arabic, and took the degree of Ph.D., his
dissertation discussing the Arabic notices of the geography of the
Punjab (_Commentatio geographica atque historica de Pentapotamia
Indica_, Bonn, 1827). Soon after he was admitted _Privatdozent_, and in
1830 was appointed extraordinary and in 1840 ordinary professor of Old
Indian language and literature. In spite of a tempting offer from
Copenhagen, in 1841, Lassen remained faithful to the university of his
adoption to the end of his life. He died at Bonn on the 8th of May 1876,
having been affected with almost total blindness for many years. As
early as 1864 he was relieved of the duty of lecturing.
In 1829-1831 he brought out, in conjunction with August W. von
Schlegel, a critical annotated edition of the _Hitopadesa_. The
appearance of this edition marks the starting-point of the critical
study of Sanskrit literature. At the same time Lassen assisted von
Schlegel in editing and translating the first two cantos of the epic
_Ramayana_ (1829-1838). In 1832 he brought out the text of the first
act of Bhavabhuti's drama, _Malatimadhava_, and a complete edition,
with a Latin translation, of the _Sankhya-karika_. In 1837 followed
his edition and translation of Jayadeva's charming lyrical drama,
_Gitagovinda_ and his _Institutiones linguae Pracriticae_. His
_Anthologia Sanscritica_, which came out the following year (new ed.
by Johann Gildemeister, 1868), contained several hitherto unpublished
texts, and did much to stimulate the study of Sanskrit in German
universities. In 1846 Lassen brought out an improved edition of
Schlegel's text and translation of the "Bhagavadgita." He did not
confine himself to the study of Indian languages, but acted likewise
as a scientific pioneer in other fields of philological inquiry. In
his _Beiträge zur Deutung der Eugubinischen Tafeln_ (1833) he prepared
the way for the correct interpretation of the Umbrian inscriptions;
and the _Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes_ (7 vols.,
1837-1850), started and largely conducted by him, contains, among
other valuable papers from his pen, grammatical sketches of the
Beluchi and Brahui languages, and an essay on the Lycian inscriptions.
Soon after the appearance of Burnouf's _Commentaire sur le Yaçna_
(1833), Lassen also directed his attention to the Zend, and to Iranian
studies generally; and in _Die altpersischen Keilinschriften von
Persepolis_ (1836) he first made known the true character of the Old
Persian cuneiform inscriptions, thereby anticipating, by one month,
Burnouf's _Mémoire_ on the same subject, while Sir Henry Rawlinson's
famous memoir on the Behistun inscription, though drawn up in Persia,
independently of contemporaneous European research, at about the same
time, did not reach the Royal Asiatic Society until three years later.
Subsequently Lassen published, in the sixth volume of his journal
(1845), a collection of all the Old Persian cuneiform inscriptions
known up to that date. He also was the first scholar in Europe who
took up, with signal success, the decipherment of the newly-discovered
Bactrian coins, which furnished him the materials for _Zur Geschichte
der griechischen und indo-skythischen Könige in Bakterien, Kabul, und
Indien_ (1838). He contemplated bringing out a critical edition of the
_Vendidad_; but, after publishing the first five fargards (1852), he
felt that his whole energies were required for the successful
accomplishment of the great undertaking of his life--his _Indische
Altertumskunde_. In this work--completed in four volumes, published
respectively in 1847 (2nd ed., 1867), 1849 (2nd ed., 1874), 1858 and
1861--which forms one of the greatest monuments of untiring industry
and critical scholarship, everything that could be gathered from
native and foreign sources, relative to the political, social and
intellectual development of India, from the earliest times down to the
Mahommedan invasion, was worked up by him into a connected historical
account.
LASSEN, EDUARD (1830-1904), Belgian musical composer, was born in
Copenhagen, but was taken as a child to Brussels and educated at the
Brussels Conservatoire. He won the _prix de Rome_ in 1851, and went for
a long tour in Germany and Italy. He settled at Weimar, where in 1861 he
succeeded Liszt as conductor of the opera, and he died there on the 15th
of January 1904. Besides many well-known songs, he wrote
operas--_Landgraf Ludwig's Brautfahrt_ (1857), _Frauenlob_ (1861), _Le
Captif_ (1868)--instrumental music to dramas, notably to Goethe's
_Faust_ (1876), two symphonies and various choral works.
LASSO (LASSUS), ORLANDO (c. 1530-1594), Belgian musical composer, whose
real name was probably Roland Delattre, was born at Mons, in Hainault,
probably not much earlier than 1532, the date given by the epitaph
printed at the end of the volumes of the _Magnum opus musicum_; though
already in the 16th century the opinions of his biographers were divided
between the years 1520 and 1530. Much is reported, but very little
known, of his connexions and his early career. The discrepancy as to the
date of his birth appears also in connexion with his appointment at the
church of St John Lateran in Rome. If he was born in 1530 or 1532 he
could not have obtained that appointment in 1541. What is certain is
that his first book of madrigals was published in Venice in 1555, and
that in the same year he speaks of himself in the preface of Italian and
French songs and Latin motets as if he had recently come from Rome. He
seems to have visited England in 1554 and to have been introduced to
Cardinal Pole, to whom an adulatory motet appears in 1556. (This is not,
as might hastily be supposed, a confusion resulting from the fact that
the ambassador from Ferdinand, king of the Romans, Don Pedro de Lasso,
attended the marriage of Philip and Mary in England in the same year.)
His first book of motets appeared at Antwerp in 1556, containing the
motet in honour of Cardinal Pole. The style of Orlando had already begun
to purify itself from the speculative and chaotic elements that led
Burney, who seems to have known only his earlier works, to call him "a
dwarf on stilts" as compared with Palestrina. But where he is orthodox
he is as yet stiff, and his secular compositions are, so far, better
than his more serious efforts.
In 1557, if not before, he was invited by Albrecht IV., duke of Bavaria,
to go to Munich. The duke was a most intelligent patron of all the fine
arts, a notable athlete, and a man of strict principles. Munich from
henceforth never ceased to be Orlando's home; though he sometimes paid
long visits to Italy and France, whether in response to royal
invitations or with projects of his own. In 1558 he made a very happy
marriage by which he had four sons and two daughters. The four sons all
became good musicians, and we owe an inestimable debt to the pious
industry of the two eldest sons, who (under the patronage of Duke
Maximilian I., the second successor of Orlando's master) published the
enormous collection of Orlando's Latin motets known as the _Magnum opus
musicum_.
Probably no composer has ever had more ideal circumstances for artistic
inspiration and expression than had Orlando. His duty was to make music
all day and every day, and to make it according to his own taste.
Nothing was too good, too severe or too new for the duke. Church music
was not more in demand than secular. Instrumental music, which in the
16th century had hardly any independent existence, accompanied the meals
of the court; and Orlando would rise from dessert to sing trios and
quartets with picked voices. The daily prayers included a full mass with
polyphonic music. This amazing state of things becomes more intelligible
and less alarming when we consider that 16th-century music was no sooner
written than it could be performed. With such material as Orlando had at
his disposal, musical performance was as unattended by expense and
tedious preliminaries as a game of billiards in a good billiard room.
Not even Haydn's position at Esterhaz can have enabled him, as has been
said, to "ring the bell" for musicians to come and try a new orchestral
effect with such ease as that with which Orlando could produce his work
at Munich. His fame soon became world-wide, and every contemporary
authority is full of the acclamation with which Orlando was greeted
wherever his travels took him.
Very soon, with this rapid means of acquiring experience, Orlando's
style became as pure as Palestrina's; while he always retained his
originality and versatility. His relations to the literary culture of
the time are intimate and fascinating; and during his stay at the court
of France in 1571 he became a friend of the poet Ronsard. In 1579 Duke
Albrecht died. Orlando's salary had already been guaranteed to him for
life, so that his outward circumstances did not change, and the new duke
was very kind to him. But the loss of his master was a great grief and
seems to have checked his activity for some time. In 1589, after the
publication of six Masses, ending with a beautiful _Missa pro
defunctis_, his strength began to fail; and a sudden serious illness
left him alarmingly depressed and inactive until his death on the 14th
of June 1594.
If Palestrina represents the supreme height attained by 16th-century
music, Orlando represents the whole century. It is impossible to
exaggerate the range and variety of his style, so long as we recognise
the limits of 16th-century musical language. Even critics to whom this
language is unfamiliar cannot fail to notice the glaring differences
between Orlando's numerous types of art, though such critics may believe
all those types to be equally crude and archaic. The swiftness of
Orlando's intellectual and artistic development is astonishing. His
first four volumes of madrigals show a very intermittent sense of
beauty. Many a number in them is one compact mass of the fashionable
harsh play upon the "false relation" between twin major and minor
chords, which is usually believed to be the unenviable distinction of
the English madrigal style from that of the Italians. It must be
confessed that in the Italian madrigal (as distinguished from the
_villanella_ and other light forms), Orlando never attained complete
certainty of touch, though some of his later madrigals are indeed
glorious. But in his French chansons, many of which are settings of the
poems of his friend Ronsard, his wit and lightness of touch are
unfailing. In setting other French poems he is sometimes unfortunately
most witty where the words are most gross, for he is as free from modern
scruples as any of his Elizabethan contemporaries. In 1562, when the
Council of Trent was censuring the abuses of Flemish church music,
Orlando had already purified his ecclesiastical style; though he did not
go so far as to Italianize it in order to oblige those modern critics
who are unwilling to believe that anything appreciably unlike Palestrina
can be legitimate. At the same time Orlando's Masses are not among his
greatest works. This is possibly partly due to the fact that the
proportions of a musical Mass are at the mercy of the local practice of
the liturgy; and that perhaps the uses of the court at Munich were not
quite so favourable to broadly designed proportion (not length) as the
uses of Rome. Differences which might cramp the 16th-century composer
need not amount to anything that would draw down the censure of
ecclesiastical authorities. Be this as it may, Orlando's other church
music is always markedly different from Palestrina's, and often fully as
sublime. It is also in many ways far more modern in resource. We
frequently come upon things like the _Justorum animae_ [Magnum Opus, No.
260 (301)] which in their way are as overpoweringly touching as, for
example, the Benedictus of Beethoven's _Mass in D_ or the soprano solo
in Brahms's _Deutsches Requiem_.
No one has approached Orlando in the ingenuity, quaintness and humour of
his tone-painting. He sometimes descends to extremely elaborate musical
puns, carrying farther than any other composer since the dark ages the
absurd device of setting syllables that happened to coincide with the
_sol-fa_ system to the corresponding _sol-fa_ notes. But in the most
absurd of such cases he evidently enjoys twisting these notes into a
theme of pregnant musical meaning. The quaintest instance is the motet
_Quid estis pusillanimes_ [Magnum Opus, No. 92 (69)] where extra
_sol-fa_ syllables are introduced into the text to make a good theme in
combination with the syllables already there by accident! (_An nescitis
Justitiae Ut Sol [Fa Mi] Re Laxatas_ _habenas possit denuo cohibere?_).
The significance of these euphuistic jokes is that they always make good
music in Orlando's hands. There is musical fun even in his voluminous
parody of the stammering style of word-setting in the burlesque motet
_S.U.Su. PER. per. super F.L.U._, which gets through one verse of a
psalm in fifteen minutes.
When it was a question of purely musical high spirits Orlando was
unrivalled; and his setting of Walter de Mape's _Fertur in conviviis_
(given in the _Magnum opus_ with a stupid moral derangement of the
text), and most of his French chansons, are among the most deeply
humorous music in the world.
But it is in the tests of the sublime that Orlando shows himself one of
the greatest minds that ever found expression in art. Nothing sublime
was too unfamiliar to frighten him into repressing his quaint fancy,
though he early repressed all that thwarted his musical nature. His
_Penitential Psalms_ stand with Josquin's _Miserere_ and Palestrina's
first book of _Lamentations_ as artistic monuments of 16th-century
penitential religion, just as Bach's _Matthew Passion_ stands alone
among such monuments in later art. Yet the passage (quoted by Sir Hubert
Parry in vol. 3 of the _Oxford History of Music_) "Nolite fieri sicut
mulus" is one among many traits which are ingeniously and grotesquely
descriptive without losing harmony with the austere profundity of the
huge works in which they occur. It is impossible to read any large
quantity of Orlando's mature music without feeling that a mind like his
would in modern times have covered a wider field of mature art than any
one classical or modern composer known to us. Yet we cannot say that
anything has been lost by his belonging to the 16th century. His music,
if only from its peculiar technique of crossing parts and unexpected
intervals, is exceptionally difficult to read; and hence intelligent
conducting and performance of it is rare. But its impressiveness is
beyond dispute; and there are many things which, like the _Justorum
animae_ cannot even be read, much less heard, without emotion.
Orlando's works as shown by the plan of Messrs Breitkopf & Härtel's
complete critical edition (begun in 1894) comprise: (1) the _Magnum
opus musicum_, a posthumous collection containing Latin pieces for
from two to twelve voices, 516 in number (or, counting by single
movements, over 700). Not all of these are to the original texts. The
_Magnum opus_ fills eleven volumes. (2) Five volumes of madrigals,
containing six books, and a large number of single madrigals, and
about half a volume of lighter Italian songs (villanellas, &c.). (3)
Three volumes (not four as in the prospectus) of French _chansons_.
(4) Two volumes of German four-part and five-part _Lieder_. (5) Serial
church music: three volumes, containing _Lessons from the Book of Job_
(two settings). _Passion according to St Matthew_ (i.e. like the
Passions of Victoria and Soriano, a setting of the words of the crowds
and of the disciples); _Lamentations_ of Jeremiah; _Morning Lessons_;
the _Officia_ printed in the third volume of the _Patroncinium_ (a
publication suggested and supported by Orlando's patrons and
containing eight entire volumes of his works); the Seven Penitential
Psalms; German Psalms and _Prophetiae Sibyllarum_, (6) one hundred
_Magnificats_ (_Jubilus B. M. Virginis_) 3 vols., (7) eight volumes of
Masses, (8) two volumes of Latin songs not in the _Magnum opus_, (9)
five volumes of unpublished works. (D. F. T.)
LASSO (Span. _lazo_, snare, ultimately from Lat. _laqueus_, cf. "lace"),
a rope 60 to 100 ft. in length with a slip-noose at one end, used in the
Spanish and Portuguese parts of America and in the western United States
for catching wild horses and cattle. It is now less employed in South
America than in the vast grazing country west of the Mississippi river,
where the herders, called locally cow-boys or cow-punchers, are provided
with it. When not in use, the lasso, called _rope_ in the West, is
coiled at the right of the saddle in front of the rider. When an animal
is to be caught the herder, galloping after it, swings the coiled lasso
round his head and casts it straight forward in such a manner that the
noose settles over the head or round the legs of the quarry, when it is
speedily brought into submission. A shorter rope called _lariat_ (Span.
_la reata_) is used to picket horses.
LAST. 1. (A syncopated form of "latest," the superlative of O.E. _laét_,
late), an adjective applied to the conclusion of anything, all that
remains after everything else has gone, or that which has just occurred.
In theology the "four last things" denote the final scenes of Death,
Judgment, Heaven and Hell; the "last day" means the Day of Judgment (see
ESCHATOLOGY).
2. (O.E. _lást_, footstep; the word appears in many Teutonic languages,
meaning foot, footstep, track, &c.; it is usually referred to a Teutonic
root _lais_, cognate with Lat. _lira_, a furrow; from this root, used
figuratively, came "learn" and "lore"), originally a footstep, trace or
track, now only used of the model of a foot in wood on which a shoemaker
makes boots and shoes; hence the proverb "let the cobbler stick to his
last," "_ne sutor ultra crepidam_."
3. (O.E. _hlaest_; the work is connected with the root seen in "lade,"
and is used in German and Dutch of a weight; it is also seen in
"ballast"), a commercial weight or measure of quantity, varying
according to the commodity and locality; originally applied to the load
of goods carried by the boat or wagon used in carrying any particular
commodity in any particular locality, it is now chiefly used as a weight
for fish, a "last" of herrings being equal to from 10,000 to 12,000
fish. The German _Last_ = 4000 lb, and this is frequently taken as the
nominal weight of an English "last." A "last" of wool = 12 sacks, and of
beer = 12 barrels.
LASUS, Greek lyric poet, of Hermione in Argolis, flourished about 510
B.C. A member of the literary and artistic circle of the Peisistratidae,
he was the instructor of Pindar in music and poetry and the rival of
Simonides. The dithyramb (of which he was sometimes considered the
actual inventor) was developed by him, by the aid of various changes in
music and rhythm, into an artistically constructed choral song, with an
accompaniment of several flutes. It became more artificial and mimetic
in character, and its range of subjects was no longer confined to the
adventures of Dionysus. Lasus further increased its popularity by
introducing prize contests for the best poem of the kind. His
over-refinement is shown by his avoidance of the letter _sigma_ (on
account of its hissing sound) in several of his poems, of one of which
(a hymn to Demeter of Hermione) a few lines have been preserved in
Athenaeus (xiv. 624 E). Lasus was also the author of the first
theoretical treatise on music.
See Suïdas s.v.; Aristophanes, _Wasps_, 1410, _Birds_, 1403 and
schol.; Plutarch, _De Musica_, xxix.; Müller and Donaldson, _Hist. of
Greek Literature_, i. 284; G. H. Bode, _Geschichte der hellenischen
Dichtkunst_, ii. pt. 2, p. 111; F. W. Schneidewin, _De Laso
Hermionensi Comment_. (Göttingen, 1842); Fragm. in Bergk, _Poet. Lyr._
LAS VEGAS, a city and the county-seat of San Miguel county, New Mexico,
U.S.A., in the north central part of New Mexico, on the Gallinas river,
and 83 m. by rail E. of Santa Fé. Though usually designated as a single
municipality, Las Vegas consists of two distinct corporations, the old
town on the W. bank of the river and the city proper on the E. bank.
Pop. of the city (1890) 2385; (1900) 3552 (340 being foreign-born and
116 negroes); (1910) 3755. According to local estimates, the combined
population of the city and the old town in 1908 was 10,000. Las Vegas is
served by the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé railway, and is its division
headquarters in New Mexico. The city lies in a valley at the foot of the
main range of the Rocky Mountains, and is about 6400 ft. above the sea.
There are high peaks to the W. and within a short distance of the city
much beautiful mountain scenery, especially along the "Scenic Route," a
highway from Las Vegas to Santa Fé, traversing the Las Vegas canyon and
the Pecos Valley forest reserve. The country E. of the city consists of
level plains. The small amount of rainfall, the great elevation and the
southern latitude give the region a dry and rarified air, and Las Vegas
is a noted health resort. Six miles distant, and connected with the city
by rail, are the Las Vegas Hot Springs. The old town on the W. bank of
the Gallinas river retains many features of a Mexican village, with low
adobe houses facing narrow and crooked streets. Its inhabitants are
largely of Spanish-American descent. The part on the E. bank or city
proper is thoroughly modern, with well-graded streets, many of them
bordered with trees. The most important public institutions are the New
Mexico insane asylum, the New Mexico normal university (chartered 1893,
opened 1898), the county court house (in the old town), the academy of
the Immaculate Conception, conducted by the Sisters of Loretto, Saint
Anthony's sanatorium, maintained by the Sisters of Charity, La Salle
institute, conducted by the Christian Brothers, a Presbyterian mission
school and a Methodist manual training and commercial school. There are
railway machine-shops, and various manufactories. Las Vegas lies in the
centre of an extensive grazing region, has large stockyards and annually
ships great quantities of wool. Three of the local newspapers are
published in Spanish. Las Vegas was founded in 1835, under the
government of the Mexican Republic. On the 15th of August 1846, during
the war between Mexico and the United States, Gen. Stephen W. Kearny
entered the town, and its alcalde took the oath of allegiance to the
United States. There was but little progress or development until the
arrival of the railway in 1879. In 1888 the part east of the river was
incorporated as a town under the name of East Las Vegas, and in 1896 it
was chartered as the city of Las Vegas. The old Las Vegas, west of the
river, was incorporated as a town in 1903.
LASWARI, one of the decisive battles of India. It was fought on the 1st
of November 1803 between the British under General Lake, and the
Mahratta troops of Sindia, consisting of the remnant of Perron's
battalions. Laswari is a village in the state of Alwar some 80 m. S. of
Delhi, and here Lake overtook the enemy and attacked them with his
cavalry before the infantry arrived. The result was indecisive, but when
the infantry came up there ensued one of the most evenly contested
battles ever fought between the British and the natives of India, which
ended in a complete victory for the British.
LATACUNGA (LLACTACUNGA, or, in local parlance, TACUNGA), a plateau town
of Ecuador, capital of the province of Léon, 46 m. S. of Quito, near the
confluence of the Alagues and Cutuchi to form the Patate, the headstream
of the Pastaza. Pop. (1900, estimate) 12,000, largely Indian. Latacunga
stands on the old road between Guayaquil and Quito and has a station on
the railway between those cities. It is 9141 ft. above sea-level; and
its climate is cold and unpleasant, owing to the winds from the
neighbouring snowclad heights, and the barren, pumice-covered table-land
on which it stands. Cotopaxi is only 25 m. distant, and the town has
suffered repeatedly from eruptions. Founded in 1534, it was four times
destroyed by earthquakes between 1698 and 1798. The neighbouring ruins
of an older native town are said to date from the Incas.
LA TAILLE, JEAN DE (c. 1540-1608), French poet and dramatist, was born
at Bondaroy. He studied the humanities in Paris under Muret, and law at
Orleans under Anne de Bourg. He began his career as a Huguenot, but
afterwards adopted a mild Catholicism. He was wounded at the battle of
Arnay-le Duc in 1570, and retired to his estate at Bondaroy, where he
wrote a political pamphlet entitled _Histoire abrégée des singeries de
la ligue_, often published with the _Satire Ménippée_. His chief poem is
a satire on the follies of court life, _Le Courtisan retiré_; he also
wrote a political poem, _Le Prince nécessaire_. But his fame rests on
his achievements in drama. In 1572 appeared the tragedy of _Saül le
furieux_, with a preface on _L' Art de la tragédie_. Like Jodelle,
Grévin, La Péruse and their followers, he wrote, not for the general
public to which the mysteries and farces had addressed themselves, but
for the limited audience of a lettered aristocracy. He therefore
depreciated the native drama and insisted on the Senecan model. In his
preface La Taille enunciates the unities of place, time and action; he
maintains that each act should have a unity of its own and that the
scenes composing it should be continuous; he objects to deaths on the
stage on the ground that the representation is unconvincing, and he
requires as subject of the tragedy an incident really terrible,
developed, if possible, by elaborate intrigue. He criticizes e.g. the
subject of the sacrifice of Abraham, chosen by Théodore de Bèze for his
tragedy (1551), as unsuitable because "pity and terror" are evoked from
the spectators without real cause. If in _Saül le furieux_ he did not
completely carry out his own convictions he developed his principal
character with great ability. A second tragedy, _La Famine ou les
Gabéonites_ (1573), is inferior in construction, but is redeemed by the
character of Rizpah. He was also the author of two comedies, _Le
Négromant_ and _Les Corrivaux_, both written apparently by 1562 but not
published until 1573. _Les Corrivaux_ is remarkable for its colloquial
prose dialogue, which foreshadows the excellence of later French comedy.
His brother, JACQUES DE LA TAILLE (1542-1562), composed a number of
tragedies, of which _La Mort de Daire_ and _La Mort d'Alexandre_ (both
published in 1573) are the chief. He is best known by his _Manière de
faire des vers en français comme en grec et en latin_, an attempt to
regulate French verse by quantity. He died of plague at the age of 20.
His _Poésies diverses_ were published in 1572.
The works of Jean de la Taille were edited by René de Maulde (4 vols.,
1878-1882). See also É. Faguet, _La Tragédie française au XVI^e
siècle_ (1883).
LATAKIA (anc. _Laodicea_), the chief town of a sanjak in the Beirut
vilayet of Syria, situated on the coast, opposite the island of Cyprus.
The oldest name of the town, according to Philo Herennius, was [Greek:
Ramitha] or [Greek: Leukè aktê] it received that of Laodicea (_ad mare_)
from Seleucus Nicator, who refounded it in honour of his mother as one
of the four "sister" cities of the Syrian Tetrapolis (Antioch, Seleucia,
Apamea, Laodicea). In the Roman period it was favoured by Caesar, and
took the name of Julia; and, though it suffered severely when the
fugitive Dolabella stood his last siege within its walls (43 B.C.),
Strabo describes it as a flourishing port, which supplied, from the
vineyards on the mountains, the greater part of the wine imported to
Alexandria. The town received the privileges of an Italian colony from
Severus, for taking his part against Antioch in the struggle with Niger.
Laodicea was the seat of an ancient bishopric, and even had some claim
to metropolitan rights. At the time of the crusades, "Liche," as Jacques
de Vitry says it was popularly called, was a wealthy city. It fell to
Tancred with Antioch in 1102, and was recovered by Saladin in 1188. A
Christian settlement was afterwards permitted to establish itself in the
town, and to protect itself by fortifications; but it was expelled by
Sultan Kala'un and the defences destroyed. By the 16th century Laodicea
had sunk very low; the revival in the beginning of the 17th was due to
the new trade in tobacco. The town has several times been almost
destroyed by earthquakes--in 1170, 1287 and 1822.
The people are chiefly employed in tobacco cultivation, silk and oil
culture, poultry rearing and the sponge fishery. There is a large export
of eggs to Alexandria; but the wealth of the place depends most on the
famous "Latakia" tobacco, grown in the plain behind the town and on the
Ansarieh hills. There are three main varieties, of which the worst is
dark in colour and strong in flavour; the best, grown in the districts
of Diryus and Amamareh, is light and aromatic, and is exported mainly to
Alexandria; but much goes also to Constantinople, Cyprus and direct to
Europe. After the construction of a road through Jebel Ansarieh to
Hamah, Latakia drew a good deal of traffic from upper Syria; but the
Hamah-Homs railway has now diverted much of this again. The products of
the surrounding district, however, cause the town to increase steadily,
and it is a regular port of call for the main Levantine lines of
steamers. The only notable object of antiquity is a triumphal arch,
probably of the early 3rd century, in the S.E. quarter of the modern
town. Latakia and its neighbourhood formerly produced a very beautiful
type of rug, examples of which are highly prized. (D. G. H.)
LATEEN (the Anglicized form of Fr. _latine_, i.e. _voile latine_, Latin
sail, so-called as the chief form of rig in the Mediterranean), a
certain kind of triangular sail, having a long yard by which it is
suspended to the mast. A "lateener" is a vessel rigged with a lateen
sail and yard. This rig was formerly much used, and is still the typical
sail of the _felucca_ of the Mediterranean, and _dhow_ of the Arabian
Sea.
LA TÈNE (Lat. _tenuis_, shallow), the site of a lake-dwelling at the
north end of Lake Neuchâtel, between Marin and Préfargier. According to
some, it was originally a Helvetic _oppidum_; according to others, a
Gallic commercial settlement. R. Forrer distinguishes an older
semi-military, and a younger civilian settlement, the former a Gallic
customs station, the latter, which may be compared to the _canabae_ of
the Roman camps, containing the booths and taverns used by soldiers and
sailors. He also considers the older station to have been, not as
usually supposed, Helvetic, but pre- or proto-Helvetic, the character of
which changed with the advance of the Helvetii into Switzerland (c.
110-100 B.C.). La Tène has given its name to a period of culture (c. 500
B.C.-A.D. 100), the phase of the Iron age succeeding the Hallstatt
phase, not as being its starting-point, but because the finds are the
best known of their kind. The latter are divided into early (c. 500-250
B.C.), middle (250-100 B.C.) and late (100 B.C.-A.D. 100), and chiefly
belong to the middle period. They are mostly of iron, and consist of
swords, spear-heads, axes, scythes and knives, which exhibit a
remarkable agreement with the description of the weapons of the southern
Celts given by Diodorus Siculus. There are also brooches, bronze
kettles, torques, small bronze ear-rings with little glass pearls of
various colours, belt-hooks and pins for fastening articles of clothing.
The La Tène culture made its way through France across to England, where
it has received the name of "late Celtic"; a remarkable find has been
made at Aylesford in Kent.
See F. Keller, _Lake Dwellings of Switzerland_, vi. (Eng. trans.,
1878); V. Gross, _La Tène un_ oppidum _helvète_ (1886); E. Vouga, _Les
Helvètes à La Tène_ (1886); P. Reinecke, _Zur Kenntnis der la Tène
Denkmäler der Zone nordwärts der Alpen_ (Mainzer Festschrift, 1902);
R. Forrer, _Reallexikon der prähistorischen ... Altertümer_ (1907),
where many illustrations are given.
LATERAN COUNCILS, the ecclesiastical councils or synods held at Rome in
the Lateran basilica which was dedicated to Christ under the title of
Salvator, and further called the basilica of Constantine or the church
of John the Baptist. Ranking as a papal cathedral, this became a
much-favoured place of assembly for ecclesiastical councils both in
antiquity (313, 487) and more especially during the middle ages. Among
these numerous synods the most prominent are those which the tradition
of the Roman Catholic church has classed as ecumenical councils.
1. The first Lateran council (the ninth ecumenical) was opened by Pope
Calixtus II. on the 18th of March 1123; its primary object being to
confirm the concordat of Worms, and so close the conflict on the
question of investiture (q.v.). In addition to this, canons were enacted
against simony and the marriage of priests; while resolutions were
passed in favour of the crusaders, of pilgrims to Rome and in the
interests of the truce of God. More than three hundred bishops are
reported to have been present.
For the resolutions see _Monumenta Germaniae_, Leges, iv., i. 574-576
(1893); Mansi, _Collectio Conciliorum_, xxi. p. 281 sq.; Hefele,
_Conciliengeschichte_, v. 378-384 (ed. 2, 1886).
2. The second Lateran, and tenth ecumenical, council was held by Pope
Innocent II. in April 1139, and was attended by close on a thousand
clerics. Its immediate task was to neutralize the after-effects of the
schism, which had only been terminated in the previous year by the death
of Anacletus II. (d. 25th January 1138). All consecrations received at
his hands were declared invalid, his adherents were deposed, and King
Roger of Sicily was excommunicated. Arnold of Brescia, too, was removed
from office and banished from Italy.
Resolutions, ap. Mansi, op. cit. xxi., 525 sq.; Hefele,
_Conciliengeschichte_, v. 438-445 (ed. 2).
3. At the third Lateran council (eleventh ecumenical), which met in
March 1179 under Pope Alexander III., the clergy present again numbered
about one thousand. The council formed a sequel to the peace of Venice
(1177), which marked the close of the struggle between the papacy and
the emperor Frederick I. Barbarossa; its main object being to repair the
direct or indirect injuries which the schism had inflicted on the life
of the church and to display to Christendom the power of the see of
Rome. Among the enactments of the council, the most important concerned
the appointment to the papal throne (Canon 1), the electoral law of 1059
being supplemented by a further provision declaring a two-thirds
majority to be requisite for the validity of the cardinals' choice. Of
the participation of the Roman clergy and populace, or of the imperial
ratification, there was no longer any question. Another resolution, of
importance for the history of the treatment of heresy, was the canon
which decreed that armed force should be employed against the Cathari in
southern France, that their goods were liable to confiscation and their
persons to enslavement by the princes, and that all who took up weapons
against them should receive a two years' remission of their penance and
be placed--like the crusaders--under the direct protection of the
church.
Resolutions, _ap._ Mansi, _op. cit._ xxii. 212 sq.; Hefele,
_Conciliengeschichte_, v. 710-719 (ed. 2).
4. The fourth Lateran council (twelfth ecumenical), convened by Pope
Innocent III. in 1215, was the most brilliant and the most numerously
attended of all, and marks the culminating point of a pontificate which
itself represents the zenith attained by the medieval papacy. Prelates
assembled from every country in Christendom, and with them the deputies
of numerous princes. The total included 412 bishops, with 800 priors and
abbots, besides the representatives of absent prelates and a number of
inferior clerics. The seventy decrees of the council begin with a
confession of faith directed against the Cathari and Waldenses, which is
significant if only for the mention of a transubstantiation of the
elements in the Lord's Supper. A series of resolutions provided in
detail for the organized suppression of heresy and for the institution
of the episcopal inquisition (Canon 3). On every Christian, of either
sex, arrived at years of discretion, the duty was imposed of confessing
at least once annually and of receiving the Eucharist at least at Easter
(Canon 21). Enactments were also passed touching procedure in the
ecclesiastical courts, the creation of new monastic orders, appointments
to offices in the church, marriage-law, conventual discipline, the
veneration of relics, pilgrimages and intercourse with Jews and
Saracens. Finally, a great crusade was resolved upon, to defray the
expenses of which it was determined that the clergy should lay aside
one-twentieth--the pope and the cardinals one-tenth--of their revenues
for the next three years; while the crusaders were to be held free of
all burdens during the period of their absence.
Resolutions, _ap._ Mansi, _op. cit._ xxii. 953 sq.; Hefele,
_Conciliengeschichte_, v. 872-905 (ed. 2). See also INNOCENT III.
5. The fifth Lateran council (eighteenth ecumenical) was convened by
Pope Julius II. and continued by Leo X. It met from the 3rd of May 1512
to the 16th of March 1517, and was the last great council anterior to
the Reformation. The change in the government of the church, the rival
council of Pisa, the ecclesiastical and political dissensions within and
without the council, and the lack of disinterestedness on the part of
its members, all combined to frustrate the hopes which its convocation
had awakened. Its resolutions comprised the rejection of the pragmatic
sanction, the proclamation of the pope's superiority over the council,
and the renewal of the bull _Unam sanctam_ of Boniface VIII. The theory
that it is possible for a thing to be theologically true and
philosophically false, and the doctrine of the mortality of the human
soul, were both repudiated; while a three years' tithe on all church
property was set apart to provide funds for a war against the Turks.
See Hardouin, _Coll. Conc._ ix. 1570 sq.; Hefele-Hergenröther,
_Conciliengeschichte_, viii. 454 sq.; (1887). Cf. bibliography under
LEO X. (C. M.)
LATERITE (Lat. _later_, a brick), in petrology, a red or brown
superficial deposit of clay or earth which gathers on the surface of
rocks and has been produced by their decomposition; it is very common in
tropical regions. In consistency it is generally soft and friable, but
hard masses, nodules and bands often occur in it. These are usually rich
in iron. The superficial layers of laterite deposits are often indurated
and smooth black or dark-brown crusts occur where the clays have long
been exposed to a dry atmosphere; in other cases the soft clays are full
of hard nodules, and in general the laterite is perforated by tubules,
sometimes with veins of different composition and appearance from the
main mass. The depth of the laterite beds varies up to 30 or 40 ft., the
deeper layers often being soft when the surface is hard or stony; the
transition to fresh, sound rock below may be very sudden. That laterite
is merely rotted crystalline rock is proved by its often preserving the
structures, veins and even the outlines of the minerals of the parent
mass below; the felspars and other components of granite gneiss having
evidently been converted _in situ_ into a soft argillaceous material.
Laterite occurs in practically every tropical region of the earth, and
is very abundant in Ceylon, India, Burma, Central and West Africa,
Central America, &c. It is especially well developed where the
underlying rock is crystalline and felspathic (as granite gneiss,
syenite and diorite), but occurs also on basalts in the Deccan and in
other places, and is found even on mica schist, sandstone and quartzite,
though in such cases it tends to be more sandy than argillaceous. Many
varieties have been recognized. In India a calcareous laterite with
large concretionary blocks of carbonate of lime is called kankar
(kunkar), and has been much used in building bridges, &c., because it
serves as a hydraulic cement. In some districts (e.g. W. Indies) similar
types of laterite have been called "puzzuolana" and are also used as
mortar and cement. Kankar is also known and worked in British East
Africa. The clay called cabook in Ceylon is essentially a variety of
laterite. Common laterite contains very little lime, and it seems that
in districts which have an excessive rainfall that component may be
dissolved out by percolating water, while kankar, or calcareous
laterite, is formed in districts which have a smaller rainfall. In India
also a distinction is made between "high-level" and "low-level"
laterites. The former are found at all elevations up to 5000 ft. and
more, and are the products of the decomposition of rock _in situ_; they
are often fine-grained and sometimes have a very well-marked
concretionary structure. These laterites are subject to removal by
running water, and are thus carried to lower grounds forming transported
or "low-level" laterites. The finer particles tend to be carried away
into the rivers, while the sand is left behind and with it much of the
heavy iron oxides. In such situations the laterites are sandy and
ferruginous, with a smaller proportion of clay, and are not intimately
connected with the rocks on which they lie. On steep slopes laterite
also may creep or slip when soaked with rain, and if exposed in sections
on roadsides or river banks has a bedded appearance, the stratification
being parallel to the surface of the ground.
Chemical and microscopical investigations show that laterite is not a
clay like those which are so familiar in temperate regions; it does not
consist of hydrous silicate of alumina, but is a mechanical mixture of
fine grains of quartz with minute scales of hydrates of alumina. The
latter are easily soluble in acid while clay is not, and after treating
laterite with acids the alumina and iron leave the silica as a residue
in the form of quartz. The alumina seems to be combined with variable
proportions of water, probably as the minerals hydrargillite, diaspore
and gibbsite, while the iron occurs as goethite, turgite, limonite,
haematite. As already remarked, there is a tendency for the superficial
layers to become hard, probably by a loss of the water contained in
these aluminous minerals. These chemical changes may be the cause of the
frequent concretionary structure and veining in the laterite. The great
abundance of alumina in some varieties of laterite is a consequence of
the removal of the fine particles of gibbsite, &c., from the quartz by
the action of gentle currents of water. We may also point out the
essential chemical similarity between laterite and the seams of bauxite
which occur, for example, in the north of Ireland as reddish clays
between flows of Tertiary basalt. The bauxite is rich in alumina
combined with water, and is used as an ore of aluminium. It is often
very ferruginous. Similar deposits occur at Vogelsberg in Germany, and
we may infer that the bauxite beds are layers of laterite produced by
sub-aerial decomposition in the same manner as the thick laterite
deposits which are now in course of formation in the plateau basalts of
the Deccan in India.
The conditions under which laterite are formed include, first, a high
seasonal temperature, for it occurs only in tropical districts and in
plains or mountains up to about 5000 ft. in height; secondly, a heavy
rainfall, with well-marked alternation of wet and dry seasons (in arid
countries laterite is seldom seen, and where the rainfall is moderate
the laterite is often calcareous); third, the presence of rocks
containing aluminous minerals such as felspar, augite, hornblende and
mica. On pure limestones such as coral rocks and on quartzites
laterite deposits do not originate except where the material has been
transported.
Many hypotheses have been advanced to account for the essential
difference between lateritization and the weathering processes
exhibited by rocks in temperate and arctic climates. In the tropics
the rank growth of vegetation produces large amounts of humus and
carbonic acid which greatly promote rock decomposition; igneous and
crystalline rocks of all kinds are deeply covered under rich dark
soils, so that in tropical forests the underlying rocks are rarely to
be seen. In the warm soil nitrification proceeds rapidly and bacteria
of many kinds flourish. It has also been argued that the frequent
thunderstorms produce much nitric acid in the atmosphere and that this
may be a cause of lateritization, but it is certainly not a necessary
factor, as beds of laterite occur in oceanic islands lying in regions
of the ocean where lightning is rarely seen. Sir Thomas Holland has
brought forward the suggestion that the development of laterite may
depend on the presence in the soil of bacteria which are able to
decompose silicate of alumina into quartz and hydrates of alumina. The
restricted distribution of laterite deposits might then be due to the
inhibiting effect of low temperatures on the reproduction of these
organisms. This very ingenious hypothesis has not yet received the
experimental confirmation which seems necessary before it can be
regarded as established. Malcolm Maclaren, rejecting the bacterial
theory, directs special attention to the alternate saturation of the
soil with rain water in the wet season and desiccation in the
subsequent drought. The laterite beds are porous, in fact they are
traversed by innumerable tubules which are often lined with deposits
of iron oxide and aluminous minerals. We may be certain that, as in
all soils during dry weather, there is an ascent of water by capillary
action towards the surface, where it is gradually dissipated by
evaporation. The soil water brings with it mineral matter in solution,
which is deposited in the upper part of the beds. If the alumina be at
one time in a soluble condition it will be drawn upwards and
concentrated near the surface. This process explains many
peculiarities of laterites, such as their porous and slaggy structure,
which is often so marked that they have been mistaken for slaggy
volcanic rocks. The concretionary structure is undoubtedly due to
chemical rearrangements, among which the escape of water is probably
one of the most important; and many writers have recognized that the
hard ferruginous crust, like the induration which many soft laterites
undergo when dug up and exposed to the air, is the result of
desiccation and exposure to the hot sun of tropical countries. The
brecciated structure which many laterites show may be produced by
great expansion of the mass consequent on absorption of water after
heavy rains, followed by contraction during the subsequent dry season.
Laterites are not of much economic use. They usually form a poor soil,
full of hard concretionary lumps and very unfertile because the potash
and phosphates have been removed in solution, while only alumina, iron
and silica are left behind. They are used as clays for puddling, for
making tiles, and as a mortar in rough work. Kankar has filled an
important part as a cement in many large engineering works in India.
Where the iron concretions have been washed out by rains or by
artificial treatment (often in the form of small shot-like pellets)
they serve as an iron ore in parts of India and Africa. Attempts are
being made to utilize laterite as an ore of aluminium, a purpose for
which some varieties seem well adapted. There are also deposits of
manganese associated with some laterites in India which may ultimately
be valuable as mineral ores. (J. S. F.)
LATH (O. Eng. _laett_, Mid. Eng. _lappe_, a form possibly due to the
Welsh _llath_; the word appears in many Teutonic languages, cf. Dutch
_lat_, Ger. _Latte_, and has passed into Romanic, cf. Ital. _latta_, Fr.
_latte_), a thin flat strip of wood or other material used in building
to form a base or groundwork for plaster, or for tiles, slates or other
covering for roofs. Such strips of wood are employed to form
lattice-work, or for the bars of venetian blinds or shutters. A
"lattice" (O. Fr. _lattis_) is an interlaced structure of laths fastened
together so as to form a screen with diamond-shaped or square
interstices. Such a screen was used, as it still is in the East, as a
shutter for a window admitting air rather than light; it was hence used
of the window closed by such a screen. In modern usage the term is
applied to a window with diamond-shaped panes set in lead-work. A window
with a lattice painted red was formerly a common inn-sign (cf.
Shakespeare, _2 Hen. IV._ ii. 2. 86); frequently the window was
dispensed with, and the sign remained painted on a board.
LATHE. (1) A mechanical appliance in which material is held and rotated
against a tool for cutting, scraping, polishing or other purpose (see
TOOLS). This word is of obscure origin. It may be a modified form of
"lath," for in an early form of lathe the rotation is given by a treadle
or spring lath attached to the ceiling. The _New English Dictionary_
points out a possible source of the word in Dan. _lad_, meaning
apparently a supporting framework, found in the name of the
turning-lathe, _drejelad_, and also in _savelad_, saw-bench,
_vaeverlad_, loom, &c. (2) One of five, formerly six, districts
containing three or more hundreds, into which the county of Kent was
divided. Though the division survives, it no longer serves any
administrative purpose. It was formerly a judicial division, the court
of the lathe being superior to that of the hundred. In this it differs
from the rape (q.v.) of Sussex, which was a geographical rather than an
administrative division. In O. Eng. the word was _laéð_, the origin of
which is doubtful. The _New English Dictionary_ considers it almost
certainly identical with O. Norse _lad_, landed possessions, territory,
with a possible association in meaning with such words as _leið_, court,
_mótlaeaða_, attendance at a meeting or moot, or with Mod. Dan. _laegd_,
a division of the country for military purposes.
LATHROP, FRANCIS (1849-1909), American artist, was born at sea, near the
Hawaiian Islands, on the 22nd of June 1849, being the great-grandson of
Samuel Holden Parsons, and the son of George Alfred Lathrop (1819-1877),
who for some time was United States consul at Honolulu. He was a pupil
of T. C. Farrar (1838-1891) in New York, and studied at the Royal
academy of Dresden. In 1870-1873 he was in England, studying under Ford
Madox Brown and Burne-Jones, and working in the school of William
Morris, where he devoted particular attention to stained glass.
Returning to America in 1873, he became known as an illustrator, painted
portraits, designed stained glass, and subsequently confined himself to
decorative work. He designed the chancel of Trinity church, Boston, and
decorated the interior of Bowdoin college chapel, at Brunswick, Maine,
and several churches in New York. The Marquand memorial window,
Princeton chapel, is an example of his work in stained glass. His latest
work was a series of medallions for the building of the
Hispanic-American society in New York. He was one of the charter members
of the Society of American Artists, and became an associate of the
National Academy of Design, New York, of which also William L. Lathrop
(b. 1859) an artist who is to be distinguished from him, became a member
in 1907. He died at Woodcliff, New Jersey, on the 18th of October 1909.
His younger brother, GEORGE PARSONA LATHROP (1851-1898), born near
Honolulu on the 25th of August 1851, took up literature as a profession.
He was an assistant editor of the _Atlantic Monthly_ in 1875-1877, and
editor of the Boston _Courier_ in 1877-1879. He was one of the founders
(1883) of the American copyright league, was prominent in the movement
for Roman Catholic summer schools, and wrote several novels, some verse
and critical essays. He was the author of _A Study of Nathaniel
Hawthorne_ (1876), and edited the standard edition (Boston, 1883) of
Hawthorne's works. In 1871 he married in London the second daughter of
Nathaniel Hawthorne--Rose Hawthorne Lathrop (b. 1851). After his death
Mrs Lathrop devoted herself entirely to charity. She was instrumental in
establishing (1896) and subsequently conducted St Rose's free home for
cancer in New York City. In 1900 she joined the Dominican order, taking
the name of Mother Mary Alphonsa and becoming superioress of the
Dominican community of the third order; and she established in 1901 and
subsequently conducted this order's Rosary Hill home (for cancerous
patients) at Hawthorne, N.Y. She published a volume of poems (1888);
_Memories of Hawthorne_ (1897); and, with her husband, _A Story of
Courage: Annals of the Georgetown Convent of the Visitation of the
Blessed Virgin Mary_ (1894).
LATIMER, HUGH (c. 1490-1555), English bishop, and one of the chief
promoters of the Reformation in England, was born at Thurcaston,
Leicestershire. He was the son of a yeoman, who rented a farm "of three
or four pounds by year at the uttermost." Of this farm he "tilled as
much as kept half a dozen men," retaining also grass for a hundred sheep
and thirty cattle. The year of Latimer's birth is not definitely known.
In the _Life_ by Gilpin it is given as 1470, a palpable error, and
possibly a misprint for 1490.[1] Foxe states that at "the age of
fourteen years he was sent to the university of Cambridge," and as he
was elected fellow of Clare in 1509, his year of entrance was in all
likelihood 1505. Latimer himself also, in mentioning his conversion from
Romanism about 1523, says that it took place after he was thirty years
of age. According to Foxe, Latimer went to school "at the age of four or
thereabout." The purpose of his parents was to train him up "in the
knowledge of all good literature," but his father "was as diligent to
teach him to shoot as any other thing." As the yeomen of England were
then in comparatively easy circumstances, the practice of sending their
sons to the universities was quite usual; indeed Latimer mentions that
in the reign of Edward VI., on account of the increase of rents, the
universities had begun wonderfully to decay. He graduated B.A. in 1510
and M.A. in 1514. Before the latter date he had taken holy orders. While
a student he was not unaccustomed "to make good cheer and be merry," but
at the same time he was a punctilious observer of the minutest rites of
his faith and "as obstinate a Papist as any in England." So keen was his
opposition to the new learning that his oration on the occasion of
taking his degree of bachelor of divinity was devoted to an attack on
the opinions of Melanchthon. It was this sermon that determined his
friend Thomas Bilney to go to Latimer's study, and ask him "for God's
sake to hear his confession," the result being that "from that time
forward he began to smell the word of God, and forsook the school
doctors and such fooleries." Soon his discourses exercised a potent
influence on learned and unlearned alike; and, although he restricted
himself, as indeed was principally his custom through life, to the
inculcation of practical righteousness, and the censure of clamant
abuses, a rumour of his heretical tendencies reached the bishop of Ely,
who resolved to become unexpectedly one of his audience. Latimer, on
seeing him enter the church, boldly changed his theme to a portrayal of
Christ as the pattern priest and bishop. The points of comparison were,
of course, deeply distasteful to the prelate, who, though he professed
his "obligations for the good admonition he had received," informed the
preacher that he "smelt somewhat of the pan." Latimer was prohibited
from preaching in the university or in any pulpits of the diocese, and
on his occupying the pulpit of the Augustinian monastery, which enjoyed
immunity from episcopal control, he was summoned to answer for his
opinions before Wolsey, who, however, was so sensible of the value of
such discourses that he gave him special licence to preach throughout
England.
At this time Protestant opinions were being disseminated in England
chiefly by the surreptitious circulation of the works of Wycliffe, and
especially of his translations of the New Testament. The new leaven had
begun to communicate its subtle influence to the universities, but was
working chiefly in secret and even to a great extent unconsciously to
those affected by it, for many were in profound ignorance of the
ultimate tendency of their own opinions. This was perhaps, as regards
England, the most critical conjuncture in the history of the
Reformation, both on this account and on account of the position in
which Henry VIII. then stood related to it. In no small degree its
ultimate fate seemed also to be placed in the hands of Latimer. In 1526
the imprudent zeal of Robert Barnes had resulted in an ignominious
recantation, and in 1527 Bilney, Latimer's most trusted coadjutor,
incurred the displeasure of Wolsey, and did humiliating penance for his
offences. Latimer, however, besides possessing sagacity, quick insight
into character, and a ready and formidable wit which thoroughly
disconcerted and confused his opponents, had naturally a distaste for
mere theological discussion, and the truths he was in the habit of
inculcating could scarcely be controverted, although, as he stated them,
they were diametrically contradictory of prevailing errors both in
doctrine and practice. In December 1529 he preached his two "sermons on
the cards," which awakened a turbulent controversy in the university,
and his opponents, finding that they were unable to cope with the
dexterity and keenness of his satire, would undoubtedly have succeeded
in getting him silenced by force, had it not been reported to the king
that Latimer "favoured his cause," that is, the cause of the divorce.
While, therefore, both parties were imperatively commanded to refrain
from further dispute, Latimer was invited to preach before Henry in the
Lent of 1530. The king was so pleased with the sermon that after it "he
did most familiarly talk with him in a gallery." Of the special regard
which Henry seemed to have conceived for him Latimer took advantage to
pen the famous letter on the free circulation of the Bible, an address
remarkable, not only for what Froude justly calls "its almost unexampled
grandeur," but for its striking repudiation of the aid of temporal
weapons to defend the faith, "for God," he says, "will not have it
defended by man or man's power, but by His Word only, by which He hath
evermore defended it, and that by a way far above man's power and
reason." Though the appeal was without effect on the immediate policy of
Henry, he could not have been displeased with its tone, for shortly
afterwards he appointed Latimer one of the royal chaplains. In times so
"out of joint" Latimer soon became "weary of the court," and it was with
a sense of relief that he accepted the living of West Kington, or West
Kineton, Wiltshire, conferred on him by the king in 1531. Harassed by
severe bodily ailments, encompassed by a raging tumult of religious
conflict and persecution, and aware that the faint hopes of better times
which seemed to gild the horizon of the future might be utterly darkened
by a failure either in the constancy of his courage or in his
discernment and discretion, he exerted his eloquence with unabating
energy in the furtherance of the cause he had at heart. At last a sermon
he was persuaded to preach in London exasperated John Stokesley, bishop
of the diocese, and seemed to furnish that fervent persecutor with an
opportunity to overthrow the most dangerous champion of the new
opinions. Bilney, of whom Latimer wrote, "if such as he shall die evil,
what shall become of me?" perished at the stake in the autumn of 1531,
and in January following Latimer was summoned to answer before the
bishops in the consistory. After a tedious and captious examination, he
was in March brought before convocation, and, on refusing to subscribe
certain articles, was excommunicated and imprisoned; but through the
interference of the king he was finally released after he had
voluntarily signified his acceptance of all the articles except two, and
confessed that he had erred not only "in discretion but in doctrine." If
in this confession he to some extent tampered with his conscience, there
is every reason to believe that his culpable timidity was occasioned,
not by personal fear, but by anxiety lest by his death he should hinder
instead of promoting the cause of truth. After the consecration of
Cranmer to the archbishopric of Canterbury in 1533 Latimer's position
was completely altered. A commission appointed to inquire into the
disturbances caused by his preaching in Bristol severely censured the
conduct of his opponents; and, when the bishop prohibited him from
preaching in his diocese, he obtained from Cranmer a special licence to
preach throughout the province of Canterbury. In 1534 Henry formally
repudiated the authority of the pope, and from this time Latimer was the
chief co-operator with Cranmer and Cromwell in advising the king
regarding the series of legislative measures which rendered that
repudiation complete and irrevocable.
It was, however, the preaching of Latimer more than the edicts of Henry
that established the principles of the Reformation in the minds and
hearts of the people; and from his preaching the movement received its
chief colour and complexion. The sermons of Latimer possess a
combination of qualities which constitute them unique examples of that
species of literature. It is possible to learn from them more regarding
the social and political condition of the period than perhaps from any
other source, for they abound, not only in exposures of religious
abuses, and of the prevailing corruptions of society, but in references
to many varieties of social injustice and unwise customs, in racy
sketches of character, and in vivid pictures of special features of the
time, occasionally illustrated by interesting incidents in his own life.
The homely terseness of his style, his abounding humour--rough, cheery
and playful, but irresistible in its simplicity, and occasionally
displaying sudden and dangerous barbs of satire--his avoidance of
dogmatic subtleties, his noble advocacy of practical righteousness, his
bold and open denunciation of the oppression practised by the powerful,
his scathing diatribes against ecclesiastical hypocrisy, the transparent
honesty of his fervent zeal, tempered by sagacious moderation--these are
the qualities which not only rendered his influence so paramount in his
lifetime, but have transmitted his memory to posterity as perhaps that
of the one among his contemporaries most worthy of our interest and
admiration.
In September 1535 Latimer was consecrated bishop of Worcester. While
holding this office he was selected to officiate as preacher when the
friar, John Forest, whom he vainly endeavoured to move to submission,
was burned at the stake for denying the royal supremacy. In 1539, being
opposed to the "act of the six articles," Latimer resigned his
bishopric, learning from Cromwell that this was the wish of the king. It
would appear that on this point he was deceived, but as he now declined
to accept the articles he was confined within the precincts of the
palace of the bishop of Chichester. After the attainder of Cromwell
little is known of Latimer until 1546, when, on account of his connexion
with the preacher Edward Crome, he was summoned before the council at
Greenwich, and committed to the Tower of London. Henry died before his
final trial could take place, and the general pardon at the accession of
Edward VI. procured him his liberty. He declined to resume his see,
notwithstanding the special request of the Commons, but in January 1548
again began to preach, and with more effectiveness than ever, crowds
thronging to listen to him both in London and in the country. Shortly
after the accession of Mary in 1553 a summons was sent to Latimer to
appear before the council at Westminster. Though he might have escaped
by flight, and though he knew, as he quaintly remarked, that "Smithfield
already groaned for him," he at once joyfully obeyed. The pursuivant, he
said, was "a welcome messenger." The hardships of his imprisonment, and
the long disputations at Oxford, told severely on his health, but he
endured all with unbroken cheerfulness. On the 16th of October 1555 he
and Ridley were led to the stake at Oxford. Never was man more free than
Latimer from the taint of fanaticism or less dominated by "vainglory,"
but the motives which now inspired his courage not only placed him
beyond the influence of fear, but enabled him to taste in dying an
ineffable thrill of victorious achievement. Ridley he greeted with the
words, "Be of good comfort, Master Ridley, and play the man; we shall
this day light such a candle by God's grace in England as (I trust)
shall never be put out." He "received the flame as it were embracing it.
After he had stroked his face with his hands, and (as it were) bathed
them a little in the fire, he soon died (as it appeared) with very
little pain or none."
Two volumes of Latimer's sermons were published in 1549. A complete
edition of his works, edited by G. E. Corrie for the Parker Society,
appeared in two volumes (1844-1845). His _Sermon on the Ploughers_ and
_Seven Sermons preached before Edward VI._ were reprinted by E. Arber
(1869). The chief contemporary authorities for his life are his own
_Sermons_, John Stow's _Chronicle_ and Foxe's _Book of Martyrs_. In
addition to memoirs prefixed to editions of his sermons, there are
lives of Latimer by R. Demaus (1869, new and revised ed. 1881), and by
R. M. and A. J. Carlyle (1899). (T. F. H.)