CONSTITUENTS OF THE LICHEN THALLUS
I. LICHEN GONIDIA
[Illustration: Fig. 1. _Physcia aipolia_ Nyl. Vertical section of
thallus. _a_, cortex; _b_, algal layer; _c_, medulla; _d_, lower cortex.
× 100 (partly diagrammatic).]
The thallus or vegetative body of lichens differs from that of other
green plants in the sharp distinction both of form and colour between
the assimilative cells and the colourless tissues, and in the relative
positions these occupy within the thallus: in the greater number of
lichen species the green chlorophyll cells are confined to a narrow zone
or band some way beneath and parallel with the surface (Fig. 1); in a
minority of genera they are distributed through the entire thallus (Fig.
2); but in all cases the tissues remain distinct. The green zone can be
easily demonstrated in any of the larger lichens by scaling off the outer
surface cells, or by making a vertical section through the thallus. The
colourless cells penetrate to some extent among the green cells; they
also form the whole of the cortical and medullary tissues.
[Illustration: Fig. 2. _Collema nigrescens_ Ach. Vertical section of
thallus. _a_, chains of the alga _Nostoc_; _b_, fungal filaments. × 600.]
These two different elements we now know to consist of two distinct
organisms, a fungus and an alga. The green algal cells were at one time
considered to be reproductive bodies, and were called “gonidia,” a term
still in use though its significance has changed.
1. GONIDIA IN RELATION TO THE THALLUS
A. HISTORICAL ACCOUNT OF LICHEN GONIDIA
There have been few subjects of botanical investigation that have roused
so much speculation and such prolonged controversy as the question
of these constituents of the lichen plant. The green cells and the
colourless filaments which together form the vegetative structure are so
markedly dissimilar, that constant attempts have been made to explain
the problem of their origin and function, and thereby to establish
satisfactorily the relationship of lichens to other members of the Plant
Kingdom.
In gelatinous lichens, represented by _Collema_, of which several species
are common in damp places and grow on trees or walls or on the ground,
the chains of green cells interspersed through the thallus have long been
recognized as comparable with the filaments of _Nostoc_, a blue-green
gelatinous alga, conspicuous in wet weather in the same localities as
those inhabited by _Collema_. So among early systematists, we find
Ventenat[152] classifying the few lichens with which he was acquainted
under algae and hazarding the statement that a gelatinous lichen such
as _Collema_ was only a _Nostoc_ changed in form. Some years later
Cassini[153] in an account of _Nostoc_ expressed a somewhat similar view,
though with a difference: he suggested that _Nostoc_ was but a monstrous
form of _Collema_, his argument being that, as the latter bore the fruit,
it was the normal and perfect condition of the plant. A few years later
Agardh[154] claimed to have observed the metamorphosis of _Nostoc_ up
to the fertile stage of a lichen, _Collema limosum_. But long before
this date, Scopoli[155] had demonstrated a green colouring substance
in non-gelatinous lichens by rubbing a crustaceous or leprose thallus
between the fingers; and Persoon[156] made use of this green colour
characteristic of lichen crusts to differentiate these plants from fungi.
Sprengel[157] went a step further in exactly describing the green tissue
as forming a definite layer below the upper cortex of foliaceous lichens.
The first clear description and delimitation of the different elements
composing the lichen thallus was, however, given by Wallroth[158]. He
drew attention to the great similarity between the colourless filaments
of the lichen and the hyphae of fungi. The green globose cells in the
chlorophyllaceous lichens he interpreted as brood-cells or gonidia,
regarding them as organs of reproduction collected into a “stratum
gonimon.” To the same author we owe the terms “homoiomerous” and
“heteromerous,” which he coined to describe the arrangement of these
green cells in the tissue of the thallus. In the former case the gonidia
are distributed equally through the structure; in the latter they are
confined to a distinct zone.
Wallroth’s terminology and his views of the function of the gonidia
were accepted as the true explanation for many years, the opinion that
they were solely reproductive bodies being entirely in accordance with
the well-known part played by soredia in the propagation of lichens—and
soredia always include one or more green cells.
B. GONIDIA CONTRASTED WITH ALGAE
In describing the gonidia of the Graphideae Wallroth[159] had pointed
out their affinity with the filaments of _Chroolepus_ (_Trentepohlia_)
_umbrina_. He considered these and other green algae when growing loose
on the trunks of trees to be but “unfortunate brood-cells” which had
become free and, though capable of growth and increase, were unable to
form again a lichen plant.
Further observations on gonidia were made by E. Fries[160]: he found
that the green cells escaped from the lichen matrix and produced new
individuals; and also that the whole thallus in moist localities might
become dissolved into the alga known as _Protococcus viridis_; but, he
continues, “though these _Protococcus_ cells multiplied exceedingly,
they never could rise again to the perfect lichen.” Kützing[161], in a
later account of _Protococcus viridis_, also recognized its affinity with
lichens; he stated that he could testify from observation that, according
to the amount of moisture present, it would develop, either in excessive
moisture to a filamentous alga, or in drier conditions “to lichens such
as _Lecanora subfusca_ or _Xanthoria parietina_.”
[Illustration: Fig. 3. _Coenogonium ebeneum_ A. L. Sm. Tip of lichen
filament, the alga overgrown by dark fungal hyphae × 600.]
A British botanist, G. H. K. Thwaites[162], at one time superintendent
of the botanical garden at Peradeniya in Ceylon, published a notable
paper on lichen gonidia in which he pointed out that as in _Collema_ the
green constituents of the thallus resembled the chains of _Nostoc_, so in
the non-gelatinous lichens, the green globose cells were comparable or
identical with _Pleurococcus_, and Thwaites further observed that they
increased by division within the lichen thallus. He insisted too that
in no instance were gonidia reproductive organs: they were essential
component parts of the vegetative body and necessary to the life of the
plant. In a further paper on _Chroolepus ebeneus_ Ag., a plant consisting
of slender dark-coloured felted filaments, he described these filaments
as being composed of a central strand which closely resembled the alga
_Chroolepus_, and of a surrounding sheath of dark-coloured cells (Fig.
3): “occasionally,” he writes, “the internal filament protrudes beyond
the investing sheath, and may then be seen to consist of oblong cells
containing the peculiar reddish oily-looking endochrome of _Chroolepus_.”
Thwaites placed this puzzling plant in a new genus, _Cystocoleus_, at the
same time pointing out its affinity with the lichen genus _Coenogonium_.
The plant is now known as _Coenogonium ebeneum_. Thwaites was on the
threshold of the discovery as to the true nature of the relationship
between the central filament and the investing sheath, but he failed to
take the next forward step.
Very shortly after, Von Flotow[163] published his views on some other
lichen gonidia. He had come to the conclusion that the various species
of the alga, _Gloeocapsa_, so frequently found in damp places, among
mosses and lichens, were merely growth stages of the gonidia of _Ephebe
pubescens_, and bore the same relation to _Ephebe_ as did _Lepra viridis_
(_Protococcus_) to _Parmelia_. The gonidium of _Ephebe_ is the gelatinous
filamentous blue-green alga _Stigonema_ (Fig. 4), and the separate cells
are not unlike those of _Gloeocapsa_. Flotow had also demonstrated
that the same type of gonidium was enclosed in the cephalodia of
_Stereocaulon_. Sachs[164], too, gave evidence as to the close connection
between _Nostoc_ and _Collema_. He had observed numerous small clumps of
the alga growing in proximity to equally abundant thalli of _Collema_,
with every stage of development represented from one to the other. He
found cases where the gelatinous coils of _Nostoc_ chains were penetrated
by fine colourless filaments “as if invaded by a parasitic fungus.” Later
these threads were seen to be attached to some cell of the _Nostoc_
trichome. Sachs concluded, however, from very careful examination at the
time, that the colourless filaments were produced by the green cells.
As growth proceeded, the coloured _Nostoc_ chains became massed towards
the upper surface, while the colourless filaments tended to occupy the
lower part of the thallus. He calculated that during the summer season
the metamorphosis from _Nostoc_ to a fertile _Collema_ thallus took from
three to four months. He judged that in favourable conditions the change
would inevitably take place, though if there should be too great moisture
no _Collema_ would be formed. His study of _Cladonia_ was less successful
as he mistook some colonies of _Gloeocapsa_ for a growth condition of
_Cladonia_ gonidia, an error corrected later by Itzigsohn[165].
[Illustration: Fig. 4. _Ephebe pubescens_ Nyl. Tip of lichen filament ×
600.]
But before this date Itzigsohn[166] had published a paper setting forth
his views on thallus formation, which marked a distinct advance. He did
not hazard any theory as to the origin of gonidia, but he had observed
spermatia growing, much as did the cells of _Oscillaria_: by increase
in length, and, by subsequent branching, filaments were formed which
surrounded the green cells; these latter had meanwhile multiplied by
repeated division till finally a complete thallus was built up, the
filamentous tissue being derived from the spermatia, while the green
layer came from the original gonidium. In contrasting the development
with that of _Collema_, he represents _Nostoc_ as a sterile product of a
lichen and, like the gonidia of other lichens, only able to form a lichen
thallus when it encounters the fructifying spermatia.
Braxton Hicks[167], a London doctor, some time later, made experiments
with _Chroococcus_ algae which grew in plenty on the bark of trees, and
followed their development into a lichen thallus. He further claimed to
have observed a _Chlorococcus_, which was associated with a _Cladonia_,
divide and form a _Palmella_ stage.
C. CULTURE EXPERIMENTS WITH THE LICHEN THALLUS
It had been repeatedly stated that the gonidia might become independent
of the thallus, but absolute proof was wanting until Speerschneider[168],
who had turned his attention to the subject, made direct culture
experiments and was able to follow the liberation of the green cells.
He took a thinnish section of the thallus of _Hagenia_ (_Physcia_)
_ciliaris_, and, by keeping it moist, he was able to observe that
the gonidial cells increased by division; the moist condition at the
same time caused the colourless filaments to die away. This method of
investigation was to lead to further results. It was resorted to by
Famintzin and Baranetzky[169] who made cultures of gonidia extracted
from three different lichens, _Physcia_ (_Xanthoria_) _parietina_,
_Evernia furfuracea_ and _Cladonia_ sp. They were able to observe the
growth and division of the green cells and, in addition, the formation
of zoospores. They recognized the development as entirely identical
with that of the unicellular green alga, _Cystococcus humicola_ Naeg.
Baranetzky[170] continued the experiments and made cultures of the
blue-green gonidia of _Peltigera canina_ and of _Collema pulposum_. In
both instances he succeeded in isolating them from the thallus and in
growing them in moist air as separate organisms. He adds that “many forms
reckoned as algae, may be considered as vegetating lichen gonidia such
as _Cystococcus_, _Polycoccus_, _Nostoc_, etc.” Meanwhile Itzigsohn[171]
had further demonstrated by similar culture experiments that the gonidia
of _Peltigera canina_ corresponded with the algae known as _Gloeocapsa
monococca_ Kütz., and as _Polycoccus punctiformis_ Kütz.
D. THEORIES AS TO THE ORIGIN OF GONIDIA
Though the relationship between the gonidia within the thallus and
free-living algal organisms seemed to be proved beyond dispute, the
manner in which gonidia first originated had not yet been discovered.
Bayrhoffer[172] attacked this problem in a study of foliose and other
lichens. According to his observations, certain colourless cells or
filaments, belonging to the “gonimic” layer, grew in a downward direction
and formed at their tips a faintly yellowish-green cell; it gradually
enlarged and was at length thrown off as a free globose gonidium, which
represented the female cell. Other filaments from the “lower fibrous
layer” of the thallus at the same time grew upwards and from them were
given off somewhat similar gonidia which functioned as male cells. His
observations and deductions were fanciful, but it must be remembered
that the attachment between hypha and alga in lichens is in many cases
so close as to appear genetic, and also it often happens that as the
gonidium multiplies it becomes free from the hypha.
In his _Mémoire sur les Lichens_, Tulasne[173] described the colourless
filaments as being fungal in appearance. The green cells he recognized
as organs of nutrition, and once and again in his paper he states that
they arose directly by a sort of budding process from the medullary or
cortical filaments, either laterally or at the apex. This apparently
reasonable view of their origin was confirmed by other writers on the
subject: by Speerschneider[174] in his account of the anatomy of _Usnea
barbata_, by de Bary[175], and by Schwendener[176] in their earlier
writings. But even while de Bary accepted the hyphal origin of the
gonidia, he noted[177] that, accompanying _Opegrapha atra_ and other
Graphideae, on the bark were to be found free _Chroolepus_ cells similar
to the gonidia in the lichen thallus. He added that gonidia of certain
other lichens in no way differed from _Protococcus_ cells; and as for
the gelatinous lichens he declared that “either they were the perfect
fruiting form of Nostocaceae and Chroococcaceae—hitherto looked on
as algae—or that these same Nostocaceae and Chroococcaceae are algae
which take the form of _Collema_, _Ephebe_, etc., when attacked by an
ascomycetous fungus.”
All these investigators, and other lichenologists such as Nylander[178],
still regarded the free-living organisms identified by them as similar to
the green cells of the thallus, as only lichen gonidia escaped from the
matrix and vegetating in an independent condition.
The old controversy has in recent years been unexpectedly reopened
by Elfving[179] who has sought again to prove the genetic origin of
the green cells. His method has been to examine a large series of
lichens by making sections of the growing areas, and he claims to have
observed in every case the hyphal origin of the gonidia: not only of
_Cystococcus_ but also of _Trentepohlia_, _Stigonema_ and _Nostoc_.
In the case of _Cystococcus_, the gonidium, he says, arises by the
swelling of the terminal cell of the hypha to a globose form, and by the
gradual transformation of the contents to a chlorophyll-green colour,
with power of assimilation. In the case of filamentous gonidia such
as _Trentepohlia_, the hyphal cells destined to become gonidia are
intercalary. In _Peltigera_ the cells of the meristematic plectenchyma
become transformed to blue-green _Nostoc_ cells.
A study was also made by him of the formation of cephalodia[180], the
gonidia of which differ from those of the “host” thallus. In _Peltigera
aphthosa_ he claims to have traced the development of these bodies to
the branching and mingling of the external hairs which, in the end, form
a ball of interwoven hyphae. The central cells of the ball are then
gradually differentiated into _Nostoc_ cells, which increase to form
the familiar chains. Elfving allows that the gonidia mainly increase by
division within the thallus, and that they also may escape and live as
free organisms. His views are unsupported by direct culture experiments
which are the real proof of the composite nature of the thallus.
E. MICROGONIDIA
Another attempt to establish a genetic origin for lichen gonidia was made
by Minks[181]. He had found in his examination of _Leptogium myochroum_
that the protoplasmic contents of the hyphae broke up into a regular
series of globular corpuscles which had a greenish appearance. These
minute bodies, called by him microgonidia, were, he states, at first few
in number, but gradually they increased and were eventually set free by
the mucilaginous degeneration of the cell wall. As free thalline gonidia,
they increased in size and rapidly multiplied by division. Minks was
at first enthusiastically supported by Müller[182] who had found from
his own observations that microgonidia might be present in any of the
lichen hyphae and in any part of the thallus, even in the germinating
tube of the lichen spore, and was in that case most easily seen when the
spores germinated within the ascus. He argued that as spores originated
within the ascus, so microgonidia were developed within the hyphae.
Minks’s theories were however not generally accepted and were at last
wholly discredited by Zukal[183] who was able to prove that the greenish
bodies were contracted portions of protoplasm in hyphae that suffered
from a lowered supply of moisture, the green colour not being due to any
colouring substance, but to light effect on the proteins—an outcome of
special conditions in the vegetative life of the plant. Darbishire[184]
criticized Minks’s whole work with great care and he has arrived at the
conclusion that the microgonidium may be dismissed as a totally mistaken
conception.
F. COMPOSITE NATURE OF THALLUS
Schwendener[185] meanwhile was engaged on his study of lichen anatomy.
Though at first he adhered to the then accepted view of the genetic
connection between hyphae and gonidia, his continued examination of the
vegetative development led him to publish a short paper[186] in which
he announced his opinion that the various blue-green and green gonidia
were really algae and that the complete lichen in all cases represented
a fungus living parasitically on an alga: in _Ephebe_, for example, the
alga was a form of _Stigonema_, in the Collemaceae it was a species of
_Nostoc_. In those lichens enclosing bright green cells, the gonidia were
identical with _Cystococcus humicola_, while in _Graphideae_ the brightly
coloured filamentous cells were those of _Chroolepus_ (_Trentepohlia_).
This statement he repeated in an appendix to the larger work on
lichens[187] and again in the following year[188] when he described more
fully the different gonidial algae and the changes produced in their
structure and habit by the action of the parasite: “though eventually the
alga is destroyed,” he writes, “it is at first excited to more vigorous
growth by contact with the fungus, and in the course of generations may
become changed beyond recognition both in size and form.” In support of
his theory of the composite constitution of the thallus, Schwendener
pointed out the wide distribution and frequent occurrence in nature
of the algae that become transformed to lichen gonidia. He claimed as
further proof of the presence of two distinct organisms that, while the
colourless filaments react in the same way as fungi on the application of
iodine, the gonidia take the stain of algal membranes.
G. SYNTHETIC CULTURES
Schwendener’s “dual hypothesis,” as it was termed, excited great interest
and no little controversy, the reasons for and against being debated
with considerable heat. Rees[189] was the first who attempted to put the
matter to the proof by making synthetic cultures. For this purpose he
took spores from the apothecium of a _Collema_ and sowed them on pure
cultures of _Nostoc_, and as a result obtained the formation of a lichen
thallus, though he did not succeed in producing any fructification. He
observed further that the hyphal filaments from the germinating spore
died off when no _Nostoc_ was forthcoming.
Bornet[190] followed with his record of successful cultures. He selected
for experiment the spores of _Physcia_ (_Xanthoria_) _parietina_ and was
able to show that hyphae produced from the germinating spore adhered
to the free-growing cells of _Protococcus[191] viridis_ and formed
the early stages of a lichen thallus. Woronin[192] contributed his
observations on the gonidia of _Parmelia_ (_Physcia_) _pulverulenta_
which he isolated from the thallus and cultivated in pure water. He
confirmed the occurrence of cell division in the gonidia and also the
formation of zoospores, these again forming new colonies of algae
identical in all respects with the thalline gonidia. He was able to see
the germinating tube from a lichen spore attach itself to a gonidium,
though he failed in his attempts to induce further growth. In our own
country Archer[193] welcomed the new views on lichens, and attempted
cultures but with very little success. Further synthetic cultures were
made by Bornet[194], Treub[195] and Borzi[196] with a series of lichen
spores. They also were able to observe the first stages of the thallus.
Borzi observed spores of _Physcia_ (_Xanthoria_) _parietina_ scattered
among _Protococcus_ cells on the branch of a tree. The spores had
germinated and the first branching hyphae had already begun to encircle
the algae.
[Illustration: Fig. 5. _Endocarpon pusillum_ Hedw. Asci and spores, with
hymenial gonidia × 320 (after Stahl).]
[Illustration: Fig. 6. _Endocarpon pusillum_ Hedw. Spore germinating in
contact with hymenial gonidia × 320 (after Stahl).]
Additional evidence in favour of the theory of the independent origin
of the colourless filaments and the green cells was furnished by
Stahl’s[197] research on hymenial gonidia in _Endocarpon_ (Fig. 5). By
making synthetic cultures of the mature spores with these bodies, he was
able to observe not only the germination of the spores and the attachment
of the filaments to the gonidia (Fig. 6), but also the gradual building
up of a complete lichen thallus to the formation of perithecia and spores.
[Illustration: Fig. 7. Germination of spore of _Physcia parietina_ De
Not. in contact with _Protococcus viridis_ Ag. × 950 (after Bornet).]
[Illustration: Fig. 8. _Physcia parietina_ De Not. Vertical section of
thallus obtained by synthetic culture × 130 (after Bonnier).]
Some years later Bonnier[198] made an interesting series of synthetic
cultures between the spores of lichens germinated in carefully sterilized
conditions, and algae taken from the open (Figs. 7 and 8). Separate
control cultures of spores and algae were carried on at the same time,
with the result that in one case lichen hyphae alone, in the other algae
were produced. The various lichen spores with which he experimented were
sown in association with the following algae:
(1) PROTOCOCCUS.
Pure synthetic cultures of _Physcia_ (_Xanthoria_) _parietina_ were begun
in August 1884 on fragments of bark. In October 1886 the thallus was
several centimetres in diameter, and some of the lobes were fruited.
_Physcia stellaris_ was also grown on bark; in one case both thallus and
apothecia were developed.
_Parmelia acetabulum_, another corticolous species, formed only a minute
thallus about 5 mm. in diameter, but entirely identical with normally
growing specimens.
(2) PLEUROCOCCUS.
_Lecanora_ (_Rinodina_) _sophodes_, sown on rock in 1883, reached in 1886
a diameter of 13 mm. with fully developed apothecia.
_Lecanora ferruginea_ and _L. subfusca_ after three years’ culture formed
sterile thalli only.
_Lecanora coilocarpa_ in four years, and _L. caesio-rufa_ in three years
formed very small thalli without fructification.
(3) TRENTEPOHLIA (Chroolepus).
_Opegrapha vulgata_ in two years had developed thallus and apothecia. The
control culture of the spores formed, as in nature, a considerable felt
of mycelium in the interstices of the bark, but no pycnidia or apothecia.
_Graphis elegans._ Only the beginning of a differentiated thallus was
obtained with this species.
_Verrucaria muralis_ (?)[199] gave in less than a year a completely
developed thallus.
Bonnier also attempted cultures with species of _Collema_ and _Ephebe_,
but was unsuccessful in inducing the formation of a lichen plant.
H. HYMENIAL GONIDIA
Reference has already been made to the minute green cells which were
originally described by Nylander[200] as occurring in the perithecia
of a few Pyrenolichens as free gonidia, _i.e._ unentangled with lichen
hyphae. Fuisting[201] found them in the perithecium of _Polyblastia_
(_Staurothele_) _catalepta_ at a very early stage of its development
when the perithecial tissues were newly differentiated from those of the
surrounding thallus. The gonidia enclosed in the perithecium differed in
no wise from those of the thallus: they had become mechanically enclosed
in the new tissue; and while those in the outer compact layers died off,
those in the centre of the structure, where a hollow space arises, were
subject to very active division, becoming smaller in the process and
finally filling the cavity. Winter’s[202] researches on similar lichens
confirmed Fuisting’s conclusions: he described them as similar to the
thalline gonidia but lighter in colour and of smaller size, measuring
frequently only 2·3 µ in diameter, though this size increased to about 7
µ when cultivated outside the perithecium.
Stahl[203] sufficiently demonstrated the importance of these gonidia in
supplying the germinating spores with the necessary algae. They come to
lie in vertical rows between the asci and, owing to pressure, assume
an elongate form[204] (Figs. 5 and 6). They have been seen in very few
lichens, in _Endocarpon_ and _Staurothele_, both rather small genera of
Pyrenolichens, and, so far as is known, in two Discolichens, _Lecidea
phylliscocarpa_ and _L. phyllocaris_, the latter recorded from Brazil by
Wainio[205], and, on account of the inclusion of gonidia in the hymenium,
placed by him in a section, _Gonothecium_.
I. NATURE OF ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ALGA AND FUNGUS
_a._ CONSORTIUM AND SYMBIOSIS. These cultures had established
convincingly the composite nature of the lichen thallus, and
Schwendener’s opinion, that the relationship between the two organisms
was some varying degree of parasitism, was at first unhesitatingly
accepted by most botanists. Reinke[206] was the first to point out
the insufficiency of this view to explain the long continued healthy
life of both constituents, a condition so different from all known
instances of the disturbing or fatal parasitism of one individual on
another. He recognized in the association a state of mutual growth and
interdependence, that had resulted in the production of an entirely new
type of plant, and he suggested _Consortium_ as a truer description of
the connection between the fungus and the alga. This term had originally
been coined by his friend Grisebach in a paper[206] describing the
presence of actively growing _Nostoc_ algae in healthy _Gunnera_ stems;
and Reinke compared that apparently harmless association with the similar
phenomenon in the lichen thallus. The comparison was emphasized by him
in a later paper[207] on the same subject, in which he ascribes to
each “consort” its function in the composite plant, and declares that
if such a mutual life of Alga and Ascomycete is to be regarded as one
of parasitism, it must be considered as reciprocal parasitism; and he
insists that “much more appropriate for this form of organic life is the
conception and title of _Consortium_.” In a special work on lichens,
Reinke[208] further elaborated his theory of the physiological activity
and mutual service of the two organisms forming the consortium.
Frank[209] suggested the term _Homobium_ as appropriate, but it is faulty
inasmuch as it expresses a relationship of complete interdependence, and
it has been proved that the fungus partly, and the alga entirely, have
the power of free growth.
A wider currency was given to this view of a mutually advantageous growth
by de Bary[210]. He followed Reinke in refusing to accept as satisfactory
the theory of simple parasitism, and adduced the evident healthy life of
the algal cells—the alleged victims of the fungus—as incompatible with
the parasitic condition. He proposed the happily descriptive designation
of a _Symbiosis_ or conjoint life which was mostly though not always, nor
in equal degree, beneficial to each of the partners or symbionts.
_b._ DIFFERENT FORMS OF ASSOCIATION. The type of association between the
two symbionts varies in different lichens. Bornet[211], in describing the
development of the thallus in certain members of the Collemaceae, found
that though as a rule the two elements of the thallus, as in some species
of _Collema_ itself, persisted intact side by side, there was in other
members of the genus an occasional parasitism: short branches from the
main hyphae applied themselves by their tips to some cell of the _Nostoc_
chain (Fig. 9). The cell thus seized upon began to increase in size, and
the plasma became granular and gathered at the side furthest away from
the point of attachment. Finally the contents were used up, and nothing
was left but an empty membrane adhering to the fungus hypha. In another
species the hypha penetrated the cell. These instances of parasitism are
most readily seen towards the edge of the thallus where growth is more
active; towards the centre the attached cells have become absorbed, and
only the shortened broken chains attest their disappearance. The other
cells of the chains remain uninjured.
[Illustration: Fig. 9. _Physma chalazanum_ Arn. Cells of _Nostoc_ chains
penetrated and enlarged by hyphae × 950 (after Bornet).]
In _Synalissa_, a small shrubby gelatinous genus, the hypha, as described
by Bornet and by Hedlund[212], pierces the outer wall of the gelatinous
alga (_Gloeocapsa_) and swells inside to a somewhat globose haustorium
which rests in a depression of the plasma (Fig. 10). The alga, though
evidently undamaged, is excited to a division which takes place on a
plane that passes through the haustorium; the two daughter-cells then
separate, and in so doing free themselves from the hypha.
[Illustration: Fig. 10. _Synalissa symphorea_ Nyl. Algae (_Gloeocapsa_)
with hyphae from the internal thallus × 480 (after Bornet).]
Hedlund followed the process of association between the two organisms
in the lichens _Micarea_ (_Biatorina_) _prasina_ and _M. denigrata_
(_Biatorina synothea_), crustaceous species which inhabit trunks of trees
or palings. In these the alga, one of the Chlorophyceae, has assumed the
character of a _Gloeocapsa_ but on cultivation it was found to belong
to the genus _Gloeocystis_. The cells are globose and rather small;
they increase by the division of the contents into two or at most four
portions which become rounded off and covered with a membrane before
they become free from the mother-cell. The lichen hypha, on contact with
any one of the green cells, bores through the outer membrane and swells
within to a haustorium, as in the gonidia of _Synalissa_.
[Illustration: Fig. 11. Gonidia from _Ramalina reticulata_ Nyl. A,
gonidium pierced and cell contents shrinking × 560; B, older stage, the
contents of gonidium exhausted × 900 (after Peirce).]
[Illustration: Fig. 12. _Pertusaria globulifera_ Nyl. Fungus and gonidia
from gonidial zone × 500 (after Darbishire).]
Penetrating haustoria were demonstrated by Peirce[213] in his study of
the gonidia of _Ramalina reticulata_. In the first stage the tip of a
hypha had pierced the outer wall of the alga, causing the protoplasm to
contract away from the point of contact (Fig. 11). More advanced stages
showed the extension of the haustorium into the centre of the cell, and,
finally, the complete disappearance of the contents. In many cases it was
found that penetration equally with clasping of the alga by the filament
sets up an irritation which induces cell-division, and the alga, as in
_Synalissa_, thus becomes free from the fungus. Hue[214] has recorded
instances of penetration in an Antarctic species, _Physcia puncticulata_.
It is easy, he says, to see the tips of the hyphae pierce the sheath of
the gonidium and penetrate to the nucleus.
Lindau[215] has described the association between fungus and alga in
_Pertusaria_ and other crustaceous forms as one of contact only (Fig.
12). He found that the cell-membrane of the two adhering organisms was
unbroken. Occasionally the algal cell showed a slight indentation, but
was otherwise unchanged. The hyphal branch was somewhat swollen at the
tip where it touched the alga, and the wall was slightly thinner. The
attachment between the two cells was so close, however, that pressure on
the cover-glass failed to separate them.
Generally the hypha simply surrounds the gonidium with clasping branches.
Many algae also lie free in the gonidial zone, and Peirce[216] claims
that these are larger, more deeply coloured and in every way healthier
looking than those in the grasp of the fungus. He ignores, however, the
case of the soredial algae which though very closely invested by the
fungus are yet entirely healthy, since on their future increase depends
in many cases the reproduction of new individual lichens.
In a recent study of a crustaceous sandstone lichen, “_Caloplaca
pyracea_,” Claassen[217] has sought to prove a case of pure parasitism.
The rock was at first covered with the green cells of _Cystococcus_ sp.
Later there appeared greyish-white patches on the green, representing the
invasion of the lichen fungus. These patches increased centrifugally,
leaving in time a bare patch in the centre of growth which was again
colonized by the green alga. The lichen fruited abundantly, but wherever
it encroached the green cells were more or less destroyed. The true
explanation seems to be that the green cells were absorbed into the
lichen thallus, though enough of them persisted to start new colonies
on any bare piece of the stone. In the same way large patches of
_Trentepohlia aurea_ have been observed to be gradually invaded by the
dark coloured hyphae of _Coenogonium ebeneum_. In time the whole of the
alga is absorbed and nothing is to be seen but the dark felted lichen.
The free alga as such disappears, but it is hardly correct to describe
the process as one of destruction.
This algal genus _Trentepohlia_ (_Chroolepus_) forms the gonidia of
the Graphideae, Roccelleae, etc. It is a filamentous aerial alga which
increases by apical growth. In the Graphideae, many of which grow on
trees beneath the outer bark (hypophloeodal), the association between the
two symbionts may be of the simplest character, but was considered by
Frank[218] to be of an advanced type. According to his observations and
to those of Lindau[219], the fungal hyphae penetrate first between the
cells of the periderm. The alga, frequently _Trentepohlia umbrina_, tends
to grow down into any cracks of the surface. It goes more deeply in when
preceded by the hyphae. In some species both organisms maintain their
independent growth, though each shows increased vigour when it comes into
contact with the other. In some instances the cells of the alga are
clasped by the fungus which causes the disintegration of the filament.
The cells lose their bright yellow or reddish colour and are changed in
appearance to greenish lichen gonidia; but no penetration by haustoria
has ever been observed in _Trentepohlia_.
Bachmann’s[220] study of a similar gonidium in a calcicolous species of
_Opegrapha_ confirms Frank’s results. The algae had pierced not only
between the looser lime granules but also through a crystal of calcium
carbonate, and occupied nests scooped out in the rock by means of acid
formed and excreted by their filaments. When association took place with
the fungus, the algal cells were more restricted to a gonidial zone; but
some of the cells, having been pushed aside by the hyphae, had started
new centres of gonidia. On contact with the hyphae there was a tendency
to bud out in a yeast-like growth.
In the thallus of the Roccelleae, the algal filament, also a
_Trentepohlia_, is broken up into separate cells, but in the
Coenogoniaceae, whether the gonidium be a _Cladophora_ as in _Racodium_,
or a _Trentepohlia_ as in _Coenogonium_, the filaments remain intact and
are invested more or less closely by the hyphae.
[Illustration: Fig. 13. Outer edge of _Phycopeltis expansa_ Jenn., the
alga attacked by hyphae and passing into separate gonidia × 500 (after
Vaughan Jennings).]
A somewhat different type of association takes place between alga and
fungus in _Strigula complanata_, an epiphyllous lichen more or less
common in tropical regions. Cunningham[221], who found it near Calcutta,
described the algal constituent and placed it in a new genus, _Mycoidea_
(_Cephaleuros_). It forms small plate-like expansions on the surface
of the leaf, and also penetrates below the cuticle, burrowing between
that and the epidermal cells; occasionally, as observed by Cunningham,
rhizoid-like growths pierce deeper into the tissue—into and below the
epidermal layer. Very frequently, in the wet season, a fungus takes
possession of the alga and slender colourless hyphae creep along its
surface by the side of the cell rows, sending out branches which grow
downwards. Marshall Ward[222] described the same lichen from Ceylon. He
states that the alga may be attacked at any stage, and if it is in a very
young condition it is killed by the fungus; at a more advanced period of
growth it continues to develop as an integral part of the lichen thallus,
but with more frequently divided and smaller cells. Vaughan Jennings[223]
observed _Strigula complanata_ in New Zealand associated with a closely
allied chroolepoid alga _Phycopeltis expansa_. He also noted the growth
of the fungus over the alga breaking up the plates of tissue and
separating the cells which, from yellow, change to a green colour and
become rounded off (Fig. 13). The mature lichen, a white thallus dotted
with black fruits, contrasts strikingly with the yellow membranous alga.
Lichen formation usually begins near the edge of the leaf and the margin
of the thallus itself is marked by a green zone showing where the fungus
has recently come into contact with the alga.
More recently Hans Fitting[224] has described “_Mycoidea parasitica_”
as it occurs on evergreen leaves in Java. The alga, a species of
_Cephaleuros_, though at first an epiphyte, becomes partially parasitic
at maturity. It penetrates below the cuticle to the outer epidermal cells
and may even reach the tissue below. When it is joined by the lichen
fungus, both constituents grow together to form the lichen. Fitting adds
that the leaf is evidently but little injured. In this lichen the alga in
the grip of the fungus loses its independence and may be killed off: it
is an instance of something like intermittent parasitism.
J. RECENT VIEWS ON SYMBIOSIS AND PARASITISM
No hyphal penetration of the bright-green algal cell by means of
haustoria had been observed by the earlier workers, Bornet[225],
Bonnier[226] and others, though they followed Schwendener[227] in
regarding the relationship as one of host and parasite. Lindau, also,
after long study accepted parasitism as the only adequate explanation of
the associated growth, though he never found the fungus actually preying
on the alga.
In recent years interest in the subject has been revived by the
researches of Elenkin[228], a Russian botanist who claims to have
established a case for parasitism or rather “endosaprophytism.” He has
demonstrated by means of staining reagents the presence in the thallus
of large numbers of dead algal cells. A few empty membranes are to be
found in the cortex and in the gonidial zone, but the larger proportion
occur below the gonidial zone and partly in the medulla. He describes
the lower layer as a “necral” or “hyponecral” zone, and he considers
that the hyphae draw their nourishment chiefly from dead algal material.
The fungus must therefore be regarded in this case as a saprophyte
rather than a parasite. The algae, he considers, may have perished
from want of sufficient light and air or they may have been destroyed
by an enzyme produced by the fungus. The latter he thinks is the more
probable, as dead cells are frequently present among the living algae
of the gonidial zone. To the action of the enzyme he also attributes
the angular deformed appearance of many gonidia and the paler colour
and gradual disintegration of their contents which are finally used up
as endosaprophytic nourishment by the fungus. Dead algal cells were
more easily seen, he tells us, in crustaceous lichens associated with
“_Pleurococcus_” or “_Cystococcus_”; they were much less frequent in the
larger foliose or fruticose lichens. Dead cells of _Trentepohlia_ were
also difficult to find.
In a second paper Elenkin records one clear instance of a haustorium
entering an algal cell, and says he found some evidence of hyphal
branches penetrating otherwise uninjured gonidia, round holes being
visible in their outer wall, but he holds that it is the cell-wall of the
alga that is mainly dissolved by the ferment and then used as food by the
hyphae.
No allowance has been made by Elenkin for the normal wasting common to
all organic beings: the lichen fungus is continually being renewed,
especially in the cortical structures, and the alga must also be subject
to change. He[229] claims, nevertheless, that his observations have
proved that the one symbiont is always preying on the other, either as a
parasite or as a saprophyte. He has likened the conception of symbiosis
to that of a balance between two organisms, “a moveable equilibrium
of the symbionts.” If, he says, we could conceive a state where the
conditions of life would be equally favourable for both partners there
would be true mutualism, but in practice one only is favoured and gains
the upper hand, using its advantage to prey on the other. Unless the
balance is redressed, the complete destruction of the weaker is certain,
and is followed in time by the death of the stronger. The fungus being
the dominant partner, the balance, he considers, is tipped in its favour.
Elenkin’s conclusions are not borne out by the long continued and
healthy life of the lichen. There is no record of either symbiont having
succumbed to the other, and the alga, when set free, is unchanged and
able to resume its normal development. Without the alga the fungus cannot
form the ascigerous fruit. Is that because as a parasite within the
lichen it has degenerated past recovery, or has it become so adapted to
symbiosis that in saprophytic conditions it fails to develop?
Another Russian lichenologist, U. N. Danilov[230], records results which
would seem to support the theory of parasitism. He found that from the
clasping hyphae minute haustoria were produced, which penetrate the algal
cell-wall, and branch when within the outer membrane, thus forming a
delicate network over the plasma; secondary haustoria arising from this
network protrude into the interior and rob the cell-contents. He observed
gonidia filled with well-developed hyphae and these, after having
exhausted one cell, travel onwards to others. Some gonidia under the
influence of the fungus had become deformed and were finally killed. As
a proof of this latter statement he adduces the presence in the thallus
of some gonidia containing shrivelled protoplasm, of others entirely
empty. He considers, as further evidence in favour of parasitism, the
finding of empty membranes as well as of colourless gonidia filled
with the hyphal network. This description hardly tallies with the usual
healthy appearance of the gonidial zone in the normal thallus, and it has
been suggested that where the fungus filled the algal cell, it was as a
saprophyte preying on dead material.
The gradual perishing of algal cells in time by natural decay and their
subsequent absorption by the fungus is undisputed. It is open to question
whether the varying results recorded by these workers have any further
significance.
These observations of Elenkin and Danilov have been proved to be
erroneous by Paulson and Somerville Hastings[231]. They examined the
thalli of several lichens (_Xanthoria parietina_, _Cladonia_ sp., etc.)
collected in early spring when vegetative growth in these plants was
found to be at its highest activity. They found an abundant increase of
gonidia within the thallus, which they regarded as sporulation of the
algae, and the most careful methods of staining failed to reveal any case
of penetration of the gonidia by the hyphae.
Nienburg[232] has published some recent observations on the association
of the symbionts. In the wide cortex of a _Pertusaria_ he found not only
the densely compact hyphae, but also isolated gonidia. In front of these
latter there was a small hollow cavity and, behind, parallel hyphae
rich in contents. These gonidia had originated from the normal gonidial
zone. They were moved upward by special hyphae called by Nienburg
“push-hyphae.” After their transportation, the algae at once divide and
the products of division pass to a resting stage and become the centre
of a new thalline growth. A somewhat similar process was noted towards
the apex of _Evernia furfuracea_. Radial hyphae pushed up the cortex,
leaving a hollow space over the gonidial zone. Into the space isolated
algae were thrust by “push-hyphae.” In this lichen he also observed the
penetration of the algal cell by haustoria of the fungus. He considers
that the alga reaps advantage but also suffers harm, and he proposes the
term _helotism_ to express the relationship.
An instructive case of the true parasitism of a fungus on an alga has
been described by Zukal[233] in the case of _Endomyces scytonemata_ which
he calls a “half-lichen.” The mature fungus formed small swellings on the
filaments of the _Scytonema_ and, when examined, the hyphae were seen to
have attacked the alga, penetrating the outer gelatinous sheath and then
using up the contents of the green cells. It is only after the alga has
been destroyed and absorbed, that asci are formed by the fungus. Zukal
contrasts the development of this fungus with the symbiotic growth of the
two constituents in _Ephebe_ where both grow together for an indefinite
time.
Mere associated growth however even between a fungus and an alga does
not constitute a lichen. An instance of such growth is described by
Sutherland[234] in an account of marine microfungi. One of these, a
species of _Mycosphaerella_, was found on _Pelvetia canaliculata_, and
Sutherland claims that as no apparent injury was done to the alga, it
was a case of symbiosis and that there was formed a new type of lichen.
The mycelium, always intercellular, pervaded the whole host-plant, and
the fungal fruits were invariably formed on the algal receptacles close
to the oogonia. Their position there is, of course, due to the greater
food supply at that region. Both fungus and alga fruited freely. A closer
analogy could have been found by the writer in the smut fungus which
grows with the host-cereal until fruiting time; or with the mycorrhiza
of _Calluna_ which also pervades every part of the host-plant without
causing any injury. In the true lichen, the alga, though constituting an
important part of the vegetative body, takes no part in reproduction,
except by division and increase of the vegetative cells within the
thallus. The fruiting bodies are always of a modified fungal nature.
2. PHYSIOLOGY OF THE SYMBIONTS
The occurrence of isolated cases of parasitism—the fungus preying on the
alga—in any case leaves the general problem unsolved. The whole question
turns on the physiological activity and requirements of the two component
elements of the thallus. From what sources do they each procure the
materials essential to them as living organisms? It is chiefly a question
of nutrition.
A. NUTRITION OF ALGAE
_a._ CHARACTER OF ALGAL CELLS. Gonidia are chlorophyll-containing bodies
and assimilate carbon-dioxide from the atmosphere by photosynthesis
as do the chlorophyll cells of other plants. They also require water
and mineral salts which, in a free condition, they absorb from their
immediate surroundings, but which, in the lichen thallus, they must
obtain from the fungal hyphae. If the nutriment supplied to them in
their inclosed position be greater or even equal to what the cells could
procure as free-living algae, then they undoubtedly gain rather than lose
by their association with the fungus, and are not to be considered merely
as victims of parasitism.
_b._ SUPPLY OF NITROGEN. Important contributions on the subject of algal
nutrition have been made by Beyerinck[235] and Artari[236]. The former
conducted a series of culture experiments with green algae, including the
gonidia of _Physcia_ (_Xanthoria_) _parietina_. He successfully isolated
the lichen gonidia and, at first, attempted to grow them on gelatine with
an infusion of the Elm bark from which he had taken the lichen. Growth
was very slow and very feeble until he added to the culture-medium a
solution of malt-extract which contains peptones and sugar. Very soon
he obtained an active development of the gonidia, and they multiplied
rapidly by division[237] as in the lichen thallus. This proved to him
conclusively the great advantage to the algae of an abundant supply of
nitrogen.
Artari in his work has demonstrated that there are two different
physiological races of green algae: (1) those that absorb peptones—which
he designates peptone-algae—and (2) those that do not so absorb peptones.
He tested the cells of _Cystococcus humicola_ taken from the thallus
of _Physcia parietina_, and found that they belonged to the peptone
group and were therefore dependent on a sufficiency of nitrogenous
material to attain their normal vigorous growth. It was also discovered
by Artari that the one race can be made by cultivation to pass over to
the other: that ordinary algae can be educated to live on peptones, and
peptone-algae to do without.
We learn further from Beyerinck’s researches that Ascomycetes, the group
of fungi from which the hyphae of most lichens are derived, are what
he terms ammonia-sugar fungi; that is to say, the hyphae can abstract
nitrogen from ammonia salts and, with the addition of sugar, can form
peptones. The lichen peptone-algae are thus evidently, by their contact
with such fungi, in a favourable position for securing the nitrogenous
food supply most suited to their requirements. In their deep-seated
layers, they are to a large extent deprived of light, but it has been
proved by Artari[238] in a series of culture experiments extending over
a long period, that the gonidia of _Xanthoria parietina_ remain green in
the dark under very varied conditions of nutriment, though the colour is
distinctly fainter.
Recently Treboux[239] has revised the work done by Artari and
Beyerinck in reference to _Cystococcus humicola_. He denies that two
physiological races are represented in this alga, the lichen gonidia,
in regard to the nitrogen that they absorb, behaving exactly as do the
free-living forms of the species. He finds that the gonidium is not a
peptone-carbohydrate organism in the sense that it requires nitrogen in
the form of peptones, inorganic ammonia salts being a more acceptable
food supply. Treboux concludes that his results favour the view that
the gonidia are in an unfavourable situation for receiving the kind of
nitrogenous compound most advantageous to them, that they are therefore
in a sense “victims” of parasitism, though he qualifies the condition as
being a lichen-parasitism or helotism. This view does not accord with
Chodat’s[240] results: in his cultures of gonidia he observed that with
glycocoll or peptone, which are nearly equivalent, they developed four
times better than with potassium nitrate as their nitrogenous food, and
he concluded that they assimilated nitrogen better from bodies allied to
peptides.
_c._ EFFECT OF SYMBIOSIS ON THE ALGA. Treboux’s observations however
convinced him that the alga leads but a meagre existence within the
thallus. Cell-division—the expression of active vitality—was, he held,
of rare occurrence in the slowly growing lichen-plant, and zoospore
formation in entire abeyance. He contrasts this sluggish increase[241]
with the rapid multiplication of the free-living algal cells which cover
whole tree-trunks with their descendants in a comparatively short time.
These latter cells, he finds, are indeed rather smaller, being generally
the products of recent division, but mixed with them are numbers of
larger resting cells, comparable in size with the lichen gonidia. He
states further, that the gonidia are less brightly green and, as he
judges, less healthy, though in soredial formation or in the open they
at once regain both colour and power of division. Treboux had entirely
failed to observe the sporulation which is so abundant at certain seasons.
Their quick recovery seems also a strong argument in favour of the
absolutely normal condition of metabolism within the gonidial cell;
and the paler appearance of the chlorophyll is doubtless associated
with the acquisition of carbohydrates from other sources than by
photosynthesis. There is a wide difference between any degree of
unfavourable life-conditions and parasitism however slight, even
though the balance of gain is on the side of the fungus. It is not too
fanciful to conclude that the demand for nitrogen on the part of the
alga has influenced its peculiar association with the fungus. In the
thallus of hypophloeodal lichens it has been proved indeed that the alga
_Trentepohlia_ with apical growth is an active agent in the symbiotic
union. _Cystococcus_ and other green algal cells are stationary, but they
are doubtless equally ready for—as many of them are equally benefited
by—the association. Keeble[242] has pointed out in the case of _Convoluta
roscoffensis_ that nitrogen-hunger induces the green algae to combine
forces with an animal organism, though the benefit to them is only
temporary and though they are finally sacrificed. The lichen gonidia, on
the contrary, persist for a long time, probably far beyond their normal
period of existence as free algae.
Examples of algal association with other plants might be cited here: of
_Nostoc_ in the roots of _Cycas_ and in the cells of _Anthoceros_, and
of _Anabæna_ in the leaf-cells of _Azolla_, but in these instances it is
generally held that the alga secures only shelter. It was by comparing
the lichen-association with the harmless invasion of _Gunnera_ cells by
_Nostoc_ that Reinke[243] arrived at his conception of “consortism.”
_d._ SUPPLY OF CARBON. Carbon, the essential constituent of all organic
life, is partly drawn from the carbon-dioxide of the air, and assimilated
by the green cells; it is also partly contributed by the fungus as a
product of its metabolism. A proof of this is afforded by Dufrenoy[244]:
he found a _Parmelia_ growing closely round pine needles and even sending
suckers into the stomata. He covered the lichen with a black cloth and
after seven weeks found that the gonidia had remained very green. That
growth had not been checked was evidenced by an unusual development
of soredia and of spermogonia. Dufrenoy describes the condition as
a parasitism of the algae on the fungus which in turn was drawing
nourishment from the pine needles.
Artari[245] has proved that lichen gonidia can obtain carbohydrates
from the substratum as well as by photosynthesis. He cultivated the
gonidia of _Xanthoria parietina_ and _Placodium murorum_ on media which
contained organic substances as well as mineral salts, while depriving
them of atmospheric carbon-dioxide and in some cases of light also. The
gonidia not only grew well but, even in the dark, they remained normally
green, a phenomenon coinciding with Etard and Bouilhac’s[246] experience
in growing _Nostoc_ in the dark: with suitable culture media the alga
retained its colour. _Nostoc_ also grows in the dark in the rhizome of
_Gunnera_. Radais’[247] experiments with _Chlorella vulgaris_ confirmed
these results. On certain organic media growth and cell-division were as
rapid in the dark as in the light, and chlorophyll was formed. The colour
was at first yellowish and the full green arrived slowly, especially on
sugar media, but in ten days it was uniform and normal.
When making further experiments with the alga, _Stichococcus bacillaris_,
Artari[248] found that it also grew well on an organic medium and that
grape sugar was the most valuable carbonaceous food supply. Chodat[249]
also found that sugar or glucose was a desirable ingredient of culture
media.
Treboux[250], in his work on organic acids, has also proved by
experimental cultures with a large series of algae, including the gonidia
of _Peltigera_, that these green plants in the absence of light and in
pure cultures would grow and form carbohydrates if the culture medium
contained a small percentage of organic acids. The acids he employed
were combined with potassium and were thus rendered neutral or slightly
alkaline; acetate of potash proved to be the most advantageous compound
of any that was tested. Amino-acids and ammonia salts were added to
provide the necessary nitrogen. Oxalic acid and other organic acids of
varying composition are peculiarly abundant in lichen tissues and may be
a source of carbon supply. Marshall Ward[251] has found calcium carbonate
crystals in the lower air-containing tissues of _Strigula complanata_.
Treboux finally concluded from his researches that just as fungi can
extract carbohydrates from many sources, so algae can secure their carbon
supply in a variety of ways. He affirms that the metabolic activity of
the alga in these cultural conditions is entirely normal, and the various
cell-contents are formed as in the light. Whether, in this case, starch
is formed directly from the acids or through a series of combinations
has not been determined. Uhlir[252], with electric lighting, made
successful cultures of _Nostoc_ isolated from Collemaceae on silicic
acid, proving thereby that these gonidia do not require a rich nutriment.
A certain definite humidity was however essential, and bacteria were
never eliminated as they are associated with the gelatinous membranes of
Nostocaceae.
_e._ NUTRITION WITHIN THE SYMBIOTIC PLANT. Culture experiments bearing
more directly on the nutrition of lichens as a whole were carried out
by F. Tobler[253]. He proved that the gonidia had undoubtedly drawn on
the calcium oxalate secreted by the hyphae for their supply of carbon.
In a culture medium of poplar-bark gelatine he grew hyphae of _Xanthoria
parietina_, and noted an abundant deposit of oxalate crystals on their
cell-walls. A piece of the lichen thallus including both symbionts and
grown on a similar medium formed no crystals, and microscopic examination
showed that crystals were likewise absent from the hyphae of the thallus
that had grown normally on the tree, the inference being that the gonidia
used them up as quickly as they were deposited. It must be remembered in
this connection, however, that Zopf[254] has stated that where lichen
acids are freely formed as, for instance, in _Xanthoria parietina_, there
is always less formation and deposit of calcium oxalate crystals, which
may partly account for their absence in the normal thallus so rich in
parietin.
Tobler next introduced lichen gonidia into a culture medium in which the
isolated hyphal constituent of a thallus had been previously cultivated,
and placed the culture in the dark. In these circumstances he found that
the gonidia were able to thrive but formed no colour: they were obtaining
their carbohydrates, he decided, not from photosynthesis, but from the
excretory products such as calcium oxalate that had been deposited in the
culture medium by the lichen hyphae. We may conclude with more or less
certainty that the loss of carbohydrates, due to the partial deprivation
of light and air suffered by the alga owing to its position in the
lichen thallus, is more than compensated by a physiological symbiosis
with the fungus[255]. It has indeed been proved that in the absence of
free carbon-dioxide, algae may utilize the half-bound CO₂ of carbonates,
chiefly those of calcium and magnesium, dissolved in water.
_f._ AFFINITIES OF LICHEN GONIDIA. Chodat[256] has, in recent years, made
cultures of lichen gonidia with a view to discovering their relation to
free-living algae and to testing at the same time their source of carbon
supply. He has come to the conclusion that lichen gonidia are probably in
no instance the normal _Protococcus viridis_: they differ from that alga
in the possession of a pyrenoid and in their reproduction by zoospores
when free.
Careful cultures were made of different _Cladonia_ gonidia which were
morphologically indistinguishable, and which varied in size from 10 to
16µ in diameter, though smaller ones were always present. He recognized
them to be species of _Cystococcus_: they have a pyrenoid[257] in the
centre and a disc-like chromatophore more or less starred at the edge.
These gonidia grew well on agar, still better on agar-glucose, but best
of all with an addition of peptone to the culture. There was invariably
at first a slight difference in form and colour in the mass between the
gonidia of one species and those of another, but as growth continued they
became alike.
In testing for carbon supply, he found that gonidia grew slowly without
sugar (glucose), and that, as sources of carbon, organic acids could not
entirely replace glucose though, in the dark, the gonidia used them to
some extent; the colony supplied with potassium nitrate, and grown in the
dark, had reached a diameter of only 2 mm. in three months. With glucose,
it measured 5 mm. in three weeks, while in three months it formed large
culture patches.
A further experiment was made to test their absorption of peptones by
artificial cultures carried out both in the light and the dark. The
gonidia grew poorly in all combinations of organic nitrogen compounds.
When combined with glucose, growth was at once more vigorous though only
half as much in the dark as in the light, the difference in this respect
being especially noticeable in the gonidia from _Cladonia pyxidata_. He
concludes that as gonidia in these cultures are saprophytic, so in the
lichen thallus also they are probably more or less saprophytic, obtaining
not only their nitrogen in organic form but also, when possible, their
carbon material as glucose or galactose from the hyphal symbiont which in
turn is saprophytic on humus, etc.
B. NUTRITION OF FUNGI
Fungi being without chlorophyll are always indebted to other organisms
for their supply of carbohydrates. There has never therefore been any
question as to the advantage accruing to the hyphal constituent in the
composite thallus. The gonidia, as various workers have proved, have also
a marked preference for organized nourishment, and, in addition, they
obtain carbon by photosynthesis. Chodat[258] considers that probably
they are thus able to assimilate carbon-dioxide in excess, a distinct
advantage to the hyphae. In some instances the living gonidium is invaded
and the contents used up by the fungus and any dead gonidia are likewise
utilized for food supply. It is also taken for granted that the fungus
takes advantage of the presence of humus whether in the substratum or
in aerial dust. In such slow growing organisms, there is not any large
demand for nourishment on the part of the hyphae: for many lichens it
seems to be mere subsistence with a minimum of growth from year to year.
C. SYMBIOSIS OF OTHER PLANTS
The conception of an advantageous symbiosis of fungi with other
plants has become familiar to us in Orchids and in the mycorhizal
formation on the roots of trees, shrubs, etc. Fungal hyphae are also
frequent inhabitants of the rhizoids of hepatics though, according to
Gargeaune[259], the benefit to the hepatic host-plant is doubtful.
An association of fungus and green plant of great interest and bearing
directly on the question of mutual advantage has been described
by Servettaz[260]. In his study of mosses, he was able to confirm
Bonnier’s[261] account of lichen hyphae growing over such plants as
_Vaucheria_ and the protonema of mosses, which is undoubtedly hurtful;
but he also found an association of a moss with one of the lower fungi,
_Streptothrix_ or _Oospora_, which was distinctly advantageous. In
separate cultivation the fungus developed compact masses and grew well in
peptone agar broth.
Cultures of the moss, _Phascum cuspidatum_, were also made from the
spores on a glucose medium. The specimens in association with the fungus
were fully grown in two months, while the control cultures, without any
admixture of the fungus, had not developed beyond the protonema stage.
Servettaz draws attention to the proved fact that, in certain instances,
plants benefit when provided with substances similar to their own decay
products, and he considers that the fungus, in addition to its normal
gaseous products, has elaborated such substances, as acid products, from
the glucose medium to the great advantage of the moss plant.
A symbiotic association of _Nostoc_ with another alga, described by
Wettstein[262], is also of interest. The blue-green cells were lodged in
the pyriform outgrowths of the siphoneous alga, _Botrydium pyriforme_
Kütz., which the author of the paper places in a new genus, _Geosiphon_.
The sheltering _Nostoc symbioticum_ fills all of the host left vacant
by the plasma, and when the season of decay sets in, it forms resting
spores which migrate into the rhizoids of the host, so that both plants
regenerate together.
Wettstein has compared this symbiotic association with that of lichens,
and finds the analogy all the more striking in that the membrane of his
new alga had become chitinous, which he thinks may be due to organic
nutrition.
II. LICHEN HYPHAE
A. ORIGIN OF HYPHAE
Lichen hyphae form the ground tissue of the thallus apart from the
gonidia or algal cells. They are septate branched filaments of single
cell rows and are colourless or may be tinged by pigments or lichen acids
to some shade of yellow, brown or black. They are of fungal nature, and
are produced by the mature lichen spore.
The germination of the spore was probably first observed by Meyer[263].
His account of the actual process is somewhat vague, and he
misinterpreted the subsequent development into thallus and fruit entirely
for want of the necessary magnification; but that he did succeed in
germinating the spores is unquestionable. He cultivated them on a smooth
surface and they grew into a “dendritic formation”—a true hypothallus.
Many years later the development of hyphae from lichen spores was
observed by Holle[264] who saw and figured the process unmistakably in
_Borrera_ (_Physcia_) _ciliaris_.
A series of spore cultures was undertaken by Tulasne[265] with the
twofold object of discovering the exact origin of hyphae and gonidia
and of their relationship to each other. The results of his classical
experiment with the spores of _Verrucaria muralis_—as interpreted by
him—were accepted by the lichenologists of that time as conclusive
evidence of the genetic origin of the gonidia within the thallus.
[Illustration: Fig. 14. Germinating spores of _Verrucaria muralis_ Ach.
after two months’ culture × ca. 500 (after Tulasne).]
The spores of the lichen in large numbers had been sown by Tulasne in
early spring on the smooth polished surface of a piece of limestone,
and were covered with a watch-glass to protect them from dust, etc.
At irregular intervals they were moistened with water, and from time
to time a few spores were abstracted from the culture and examined
microscopically. Tulasne observed that the spore did not increase or
change in volume in the process of germination, but that gradually the
contents passed out into the growing hyphae, till finally a thin membrane
only was left and still persisted after two months (Fig. 14). For a
considerable time there was no septation; at length cross-divisions were
formed, at first close to the spore, and then later in the branches. The
hyphae meanwhile increased in dimension, the cells becoming rounder and
somewhat wider, though always more slender than the spore which had given
rise to them. In time a felted tissue was formed with here and there
certain cells, filled with green colouring matter, similar to the gonidia
of the lichen and thus the early stages at least of a new thallus were
observed. The green cells, we now know, must have gained entrance to the
culture from the air, or they may have been introduced with the water.
B. DEVELOPMENT OF LICHENOID HYPHAE
Lichen hyphae are usually thick-walled, thus differing from those of
fungi generally, in which the membranes, as a rule, remain comparatively
thin. This character was adduced by the so-called “autonomous” school as
a proof of the fundamental distinction between the hyphal elements of
the two groups of plants. It can, however, easily be observed that, in
the early stages of germination, the lichen hyphae, as they issue from
the spore, are thin-walled and exactly comparable with those of fungi.
Growth is apical, and septation and branching arise exactly as in fungi,
and, in certain circumstances, anastomosis takes place between converging
filaments. But if algae are present in the culture the peculiar lichen
characteristics very soon appear.
Bonnier[266], who made a large series of synthetic cultures,
distinguishes three types of growth in lichenoid hyphae (Fig. 15):
1. Clasping filaments, repeatedly branched, which attach and surround the
algae.
2. Filaments with rather short swollen cells which ultimately form the
hyphal tissues of cortex and medulla.
3. Searching filaments which elongate towards the periphery and go to the
encounter of new algae.
In five days after germination of the spores, the clasping hyphae had
laid hold of the algae which meanwhile had increased by division;
the swollen cells had begun to branch out and ten days later a
differentiation of tissue was already apparent. The searching filaments
had increased in number and length, and anastomosis between them had
taken place when no further algae were encountered. The cell-walls of
the swollen hyphae and their branches had begun to thicken and to become
united to form a kind of cellular tissue or “paraplectenchyma[267].” At
a later date, about a month after the sowing of the spores, there was a
definite cellular cortex formed over the thallus. The hyphal cells are
uninucleate, though in the medulla they may be 1-2-nucleate.
[Illustration: Fig. 15. Synthetic culture of _Physcia parietina_ spores
and _Protococcus viridis_ five days after germination. _s_, lichen-spore;
_a_, septate filaments; _b_, clasping filaments; _c_, searching
filaments. × 500 (after Bonnier).]
The hyphae in close contact with the gonidia remain thin-walled, and
have been termed by Wainio[268] “meristematic.” They furnish the growing
elements of the lichen either apical or intercalary. In most genera the
organs of fructification take rise from them, or in their immediate
neighbourhood, and isidia and soredia also originate from these gonidial
hyphae.
As the filaments pass from the gonidial zone to other layers, the
cell-walls become thicker with a consequent reduction of the cell-lumen,
very noticeable in the pith, but carried to its furthest extent in the
“decomposed” cortex where the cells in the degenerate tissue often become
reduced to disconnected streaks indicating the cell-lumen, and the outer
cortical layer is merely a continuous mass of mucilage.
All lichen tissues arise from the branching and septation of the hyphae,
the septa always forming at right angles to the long axis of the
filaments. There is no instance of longitudinal cell-division except in
the spores of certain genera (_Collema_, _Urceolaria_, _Polyblastia_,
etc.). The branching of the hypha is dichotomous or lateral, and very
irregular. Frequent septation and coherent growth result in the formation
of plectenchyma.
C. CULTURE OF HYPHAE WITHOUT GONIDIA
Artificial cultures had demonstrated the germination of lichen spores,
with the formation of hyphae, and from synthetic cultures of fungus and
alga complete lichen plants had been produced. To Möller[269] we owe
the first cultures of a thalline body from the fungus alone, both from
spermatia and from ascospores. The germination of the spermatia has a
direct bearing on their function as spores or as sexual organs and is
described in a later chapter.
The ascospores of _Lecanora subfusca_ were caught in a drop of water on
a slide as they were ejaculated from the ascus, and, on the following
day, a very fine germinating tube was seen to have pierced the exospore.
The hypha became slightly thicker, and branching began on the third day.
If in water alone the culture soon died off, but in a nutrient solution
growth slowly continued. The hyphae branched out in all directions from
the spore as a centre and formed an orbicular expansion which in fourteen
days had reached a size of ·1 mm. in diameter. After three weeks’ growth
it was large enough to be visible without a lens; the mycelial threads
were more crowded, and certain terminal hyphae had branched upwards in
an aerial tuft, this development taking place from the centre outwards.
Möller marked this stage as the transition from a mere protothallus to a
thallus formation. In three months a diameter of 1·5-2 mm. was reached;
a transverse section gave a thickness of ·86 mm. and from the under
side loose hyphae branched downwards and attached the thallus, when it
had been transferred to a solid substratum such as cork. Above these
rhizoidal hyphae, a stratum of rather loose mycelium represented the
medulla, and, surmounting that, a cortical layer in which the hyphae were
very closely compacted. Delicate terminal branches rose into the air over
the whole surface, very similar in character to hypothallic hyphae at the
margin of the thallus.
_Lecanora subfusca_ has a rather small simple spore; it emitted
germinating tubes from each end, and a septum across the middle of the
spore appeared after germination had taken place. Another experiment
was with a much larger muriform spore measuring 80 µ in length and 20 µ
in thickness. On germination about 20 tubes were formed, some of them
rising into the air at once, the others encircling the spore, so that the
thallus took form immediately; growth in this case also was centrifugal.
In three months a diameter of 6 mm. was reached with a thickness of 1 to
2 mm. and showing a differentiation into medulla and cortex. The hyphae
did not increase in width, but frequently globose or ovate swellings
arose in or at the ends, a character which recurs in the natural growth
of hyphae both of lichens and of Ascomycetes. These swellings depend on
the nutrition.
_Pertusaria communis_ possesses a very large simple spore, but it is
multinucleate and germinates with about 100 tubes which reach their
ultimate width of 3 to 4 µ before they emerge from the exospore. The
hyphae encircle the spore, and an opaque thalline growth is quickly
formed from which rise terminal hyphal branches. In ten weeks the
differentiation into medulla and cortex was reached, and in five months
the hyphal thallus measured 4 mm. in diameter and 1 to 2 mm. in thickness.
Möller instituted a comparison between the thalli he obtained from the
spores and those from the spermatia of another crustaceous lichen,
_Buellia punctiformis_ (_B. myriocarpa_). After germination had taken
place the hyphae from the spermatia grew at first more quickly than those
from the ascospores, but as soon as thallus formation began the latter
caught up and, in eight weeks, both thalli were of equal size.
Another comparative culture with the spermatia and ascospores of
_Opegrapha subsiderella_ gave similar results: the spores of that species
are elongate-fusiform and 6-to 8-septate; germination took place from
the end cells in two to three days after sowing. The germinating hyphae
corresponded exactly with those from the spermatia and growth was equally
slow in both. The middle cells of the spores may also produce germinating
tubes, but never more than about five were observed from any one spore.
A browning of the cortical layer was especially apparent in the hyphal
culture from another lichen, _Graphis scripta_: a clear brown colour
gradually changing to black appeared about the same period in all the
cultures.
The hyphae from the spores of _Arthonia_ developed quickest of all:
the hyphae were very slender, but in three to four months the growth
had reached a diameter of 8 mm. In this plant there was the usual
outgrowth of delicate hyphae from the surface; no definite cortical layer
appeared, but only a very narrow line of more closely interwoven somewhat
darker hyphae. Frequently, from the surface of the original thallus,
excrescences arose which were the beginnings of further thalli.
Tobler[270] experimenting with _Xanthoria parietina_ gained very similar
results. The spores were grown in malt extract for ten days, then
transferred to gelatine. In three to five weeks there was formed an
orbicular mycelial felt about 3 mm. in diameter and 2 mm. thick. The
mycelium was frequently brownish even in healthy cultures, but the aerial
hyphae which, at first, rose above the surface were always colourless.
After these latter disappeared a distinct brownish tinge of the thallus
was visible. In seven months it had increased in size to 15 mm. in
length, 7 mm. in width and 3 mm. thick with a differentiation into three
layers: a lower rather dense tissue representing the pith, above that a
layer of loose hyphae where the gonidial zone would normally find place,
and above that a second compact tissue, or outer cortex, from which arose
the aerial hyphae. The culture could not be prolonged more than eight
months.
D. CONTINUITY OF PROTOPLASM IN HYPHAL CELLS
Wahrlich[271] demonstrated that continuity of protoplasm was as constant
between the cells of fungi as it has been proved to be between the cells
of the higher plants. His researches included the hyphae of the lichens,
_Cladonia fimbriata_ and _Physcia_ (_Xanthoria_) _parietina_.
Baur[272] and Darbishire[273] found independently that an open connection
existed between the cells of the carpogonial structures in the lichens
they examined. The subject as regards the thalline hyphae was again
taken up by Kienitz-Gerloff[274] who obtained his best results in the
hypothecial tissue of _Peltigera canina_ and _P. polydactyla_. Most of
the cross septa showed one central protoplasmic strand traversing the
wall from cell to cell, but in some instances there were as many as four
to six pits in the walls. The thickening of the cell-walls is uneven
and projects variously into the cavity of the cell. Meyer’s[275] work
was equally conclusive: all the cells of an individual hypha, he found,
are in protoplasmic connection; and in plectenchymatous tissue the side
walls are frequently perforated. Cell-fusions due to anastomosis are
frequent in lichen hyphae, and the wall at or near the point of fusion
is also traversed by a thread of protoplasm, though such connections are
regarded as adventitious. Fusions with plasma connections are numerous
in the matted hairs on the upper surface of _Peltigera canina_ and they
also occur between the hyphae forming the rhizoids of that lichen. The
work of Salter[276] may also be noted. He claimed that his researches
tended to show complete anatomical union between all the tissues of the
lichen plant, not only between the hyphae of the various tissues but also
between hyphae and gonidia.
III. LICHEN ALGAE
A. TYPES OF ALGAE
The algal constituents of the lichen thallus belong to the two classes,
Myxophyceae, generally termed blue-green algae, and Chlorophyceae
which are coloured bright-green or yellow-green. Most of them are
land forms, and, in a free condition, they inhabit moist or shady
situations, tree-trunks, walls, etc. They multiply by division or by
sporulation within the thallus; zoospores are never formed except in open
cultivation. The determination of the genera and species to which the
lichen algae severally belong is often uncertain, but their distribution
within the lichen kingdom is as follows:
_a._ MYXOPHYCEAE ASSOCIATED WITH PHYCOLICHENS. The blue-green algae
are characterized by the colour of their pigments which persists in
the gonidial condition giving various tints to the component lichens,
and by the gelatinous sheath in which most of them are enclosed. This
sheath, both in the lichen gonidia[277] and in free-living forms, imbibes
and retains moisture to a remarkable extent and the thallus containing
blue-green algae profits by its power of storing moisture. Myxophyceae
form the gonidia of the gelatinous lichens as well as of some other
non-gelatinous genera. Several families are represented[278]:
Fam. CHROOCOCCACEAE. This family includes unicellular algae with thick
gelatinous sheaths. They increase normally by division, and colonies
arise by the cohesion of the cells. Several genera form gonidia:
1. CHROOCOCCUS Naeg. Solitary or forming small colonies of 2-4-8 cells
(Fig. 16) generally surrounded by firm gelatinous colourless sheaths
in definite layers (lamellate). _Chroococcus_ is considered by some
lichenologists to form the gonidium of _Cora_, a genus of Hymenolichens.
2. MICROCYSTIS Kütz. Globose or subglobose cells forming large colonies
surrounded by a common gelatinous layer (gonidia of _Coriscium_).
[Illustration: Fig. 16. Examples of _Chroococcus_. A, _Ch. giganteus_
West; B, _Ch. turgidus_ Naeg.; C and D, _Ch. schizodermaticus_ West × 450
(after West).]
[Illustration: Fig. 17. _Gloeocapsa magma_ Kütz. × 450 (after West).]
3. GLOEOCAPSA Kütz. (including _Xanthocapsa_). Globose cells with a
lamellate gelatinous wall, forming colonies enclosed in a common sheath
(Fig. 17); the inner integument is often coloured red or orange. These
two genera form the gonidia in the family Pyrenopsidaceae. _Gloeocapsa
polydermatica_ Kütz. has been identified as a lichen gonidium.
Fam. NOSTOCACEAE. Filamentous algae unbranched and without base or apex.
NOSTOC Vauch. Composed of flexuous trichomes, with intercalary
heterocysts (colourless cells) (Fig. 18). Dense gelatinous colonies of
definite form are built up by cohesion. In some lichens the trichomes
retain their chain-like appearance, in others they are more or less
broken up and massed together, with disappearance of the gelatinous
sheath (as in _Peltigera_); colour mostly dark blue-green.
[Illustration: Fig. 18. Examples of _Nostoc_. _N. Linckia_ Born. A, nat.
size; B, small portion × 340; C, _N. coerulescens_ Lyngbye, nat. size
(after West).]
[Illustration: Fig. 19. Example of _Scytonema_ alga. _S. mirabile_ Thur.
C, apex of a branch; D, organ of attachment at base of filament. × 440
(after West).]
_Nostoc_ occurs in a few or all of the genera of Pyrenidiaceae,
Collemaceae, Pannariaceae, Peltigeraceae and Stictaceae, and _N.
sphaericum_ Vauch. (_N. lichenoides_ Kütz.) has been determined as
the lichen gonidium. When the chains are broken up it has been wrongly
classified as another alga, _Polycoccus punctiformis_.
Fam. SCYTONEMACEAE. Trichomes of single-cell rows, differentiated into
base and apex. Pseudo-branching arises at right angles to the main
filament.
SCYTONEMA Ag. Pseudo-branches piercing the sheath and passing out as twin
filaments (Fig. 19); colour, golden-brown. This alga occurs in genera of
Pyrenidiaceae, Ephebaceae, Pannariaceae, Heppiaceae, in _Petractis_ a
genus of Gyalectaceae, and in _Dictyonema_ one of the Hymenolichens.
Fam. STIGONEMACEAE. Trichomes of several-cell rows with base and apex;
colour, golden-brown.
STIGONEMA Ag. Stouter than _Scytonema_, with transverse and vertical
division of the cells, and generally copious branching (Fig. 20). This
alga occurs only in a few genera of Ephebaceae. _S. panniforme_ Kirchn.
(_Sirosiphon pulvinatus_ Bréb.) has been determined as forming the
gonidium.
Fam. RIVULARIACEAE. Trichomes with a heterocyst at the base and tapering
upwards, enclosed in mucilage (Fig. 21).
[Illustration: Fig. 20. _Stigonema_ sp. × 200 (after Comère).]
[Illustration: Fig. 21. Examples of _Rivularia_; A, B, C, R.
_Biasolettiana_ Menegh.; D and E, _R. minutula_ Born. and Fl. A and D
nat. size; B, C and E × 480 (after West).]
RIVULARIA Thuret. In tufts fixed at the base and forming roundish
gelatinous colonies; colour, blue-green. The gonidium of Lichinaceae has
been identified as _R. nitida_ Ag.
Algae belonging to one or other of these genera of Myxophyceae also
combine with the hyphae of Archilichens to form cephalodia[279] and
Krempelhuber[280] has recorded and figured a blue-green alga, probably
_Gloeocapsa_, in _Baeomyces paeminosus_ from the South Sea Islands. They
also form the gonidia in a few species and genera of such families as
Stictaceae and Peltigeraceae.
_b._ CHLOROPHYCEAE ASSOCIATED WITH ARCHILICHENS. The lichens of this
group are by far the most numerous both in genera and species, though
fewer algal families are represented.
Fam. PROTOCOCCACEAE. Consisting of globular single cells, aggregated in
loose colonies, dividing variously.
[Illustration: Fig. 22. _Pleurococcus vulgaris_ Menegh. (_Protococcus
viridis_ Ag.). _chl._ chloroplast; _p._ protoderma stage; _pa_,
palmelloid stage; _py_, pyrenoid. × 520 (after West).]
1. PROTOCOCCUS VIRIDIS Ag. (_Pleurococcus vulgaris_ Menegh.,
_Cystococcushumicola_ Naeg.). Cells dividing into 2, 4 or 8
daughter-cells and not separating readily; in excessive moisture forming
short filaments. The cells contain parietal chloroplasts, and, according
to Chodat[281], are without a pyrenoid (Fig. 22). This alga, and allied
species, forms the familiar green coating of tree-trunks, walls etc.,
and, in lichenological literature, are quoted as the gonidia of most
of the crustaceous foliose and fruticose lichens. Chodat[281], who has
recently made comparative artificial cultures of algae, throws doubt
on the identity of many such gonidia. He lays great emphasis on the
presence or absence of a pyrenoid in algal cells. West, on the contrary,
considers the pyrenoid as an inconstant character. Chodat insists that
the gonidia that contain pyrenoids belong to another genus, _Cystococcus_
Chod. (_non_ Naeg.), a pyrenoid-containing alga, which, in addition to
multiplying by division of the cells, also forms spores and zoospores
when cultivated. He further records the results of his cultures of
gonidia, and finds that those taken from closely related lichens, such as
different species of _Cladonia_, though they are alike morphologically,
yet show constant variations in the culture colonies. These, he holds,
are sufficient to indicate difference of race if not of species and he
designates the algae, according to the lichen in which they occur, as
_Cystococcus Cladoniae pyxidatae_, _C. Cladoniae fimbriatae_, etc.
[Illustration: Fig. 23. _Cystococcus Cladoniae pyxidatae_ Chod. from
culture × 800 (after Chodat).]
[Illustration: Fig. 23 A. A, C, _Chlorella vulgaris_ Beyer. B and C,
stages in division × about 800 (after Chodat); E, _Chl. faginea_ Wille
× 520 (after Gerneck); F-I _Chl. miniata_; F, vegetable cell; G-I,
formation and escape of gonidia × 1000 (after Chodat).]
Meanwhile Paulson and Somerville Hastings[282] by their careful research
on the growing thallus have thrown considerable light on the identity
of the Protococcaceous lichen gonidium. They selected such well-known
lichens as _Xanthoria parietina, Cladonia_ spp. and others, which they
collected during the spring months, February to April, the period of
most active growth. Many of the gonidia, they found, were in a stage of
reproduction, that showed a simultaneous rounding off of the gonidium
contents into globose bodies varying in number up to 32. Chodat had
figured this method of “sporulation” in his cultures of the lichen
gonidium both in _Chlorella_ Beij. and in _Cystococcus_ Chod. (Fig.
23). It has now been abundantly proved that this form of increase is
of frequent occurrence in the thallus itself. _Chlorella_ has been
suggested as probably the alga forming these gonidia and recently West
has signified his acquiescence in this view[283].
2. CHLORELLA Beij. Occurring frequently on damp ground, bark of trees,
etc., dividing into numerous daughter-cells, probably reduced zoogonidia
(Fig. 23).
Chodat distinguishes between _Cystococcus_ and _Chlorella_ in that
_Cystococcus_ may form zoospores (though rarely), _Chlorella_ only
aplanospores. He found three gonidial species, _Chlorella lichina_
in _Cladonia rangiferina, Ch. viscosa_ and _Ch. Cladoniae_ in other
_Cladonia_ spp.
3. COCCOBOTRYS Chod. The cells of this new algal genus are smaller than
those of _Cystococcus_ or _Protococcus_ and have no pyrenoid. They were
isolated by Chodat from the thallus of _Verrucaria nigrescens_ (Fig. 24),
and, as they have thick membranes, they adhere in a continuous layer or
thallus. Chodat also claims to have isolated a species of _Coccobotrys_
from _Dermatocarpon miniatum_, a foliose Pyrenolichen.
4. COCCOMYXA Schmidle. Cells ellipsoid, also without a pyrenoid. Two
species were obtained by Chodat from the thallus of _Solorinae_ and are
recorded as _Coccomyxa Solorinae croceae_ and _C. Solorinae saccatae_.
_Coccomyxa subellipsoidea_ is given[284] as the gonidium of the primitive
lichen _Botrydina vulgaris_ (Fig. 25). The cells are surrounded by a
common gelatinous sheath.
[Illustration: Fig. 24. _Coccobotrys Verrucariae_ Chod. from culture ×
800 (after Chodat).]
[Illustration: Fig. 25. _Coccomyxa subellipsoidea_ Acton. Actively
dividing cells, the dark portions indicating the chloroplasts × 1000
(after Acton).]
5. DIPLOSPHAERA Bial.[285] _D. Chodati_ was taken from the thallus
of _Lecanora tartarea_ and successfully cultivated. It resembles
_Protococcus_, but has smaller cells and grows more rapidly; it is
evidently closely allied to that genus, if not merely a form of it.
6. UROCOCCUS Kütz. Cells more or less globose, rather large, and coloured
with a red-brown pigment, with the cell-wall thick and lamellate,
forming elongate strands of cells (Fig. 26). Recorded by Hue[286] in the
cephalodium of _Lepolichen coccophorus_, a Chilian lichen.
Fam. TETRASPORACEAE. Cells in groups of 2 or 4 surrounded by a gelatinous
sheath.
1. PALMELLA Lyngb. Cells globose, oblong or ellipsoid, grouped without
order in a formless mucilage (Fig. 27). Among lichens associated with
_Palmella_ are the Epigloeaceae and Chrysothricaceae.
[Illustration: Fig. 26. _Urococcus_ sp. Group of cells much magnified
(after Hassall).]
[Illustration: Fig. 27. _Palmella_ sp. × 400 (after Comère).]
[Illustration: Fig. 28. _Gloeocystis_ sp. × 400 (after Comère).]
2. GLOEOCYSTIS Naeg. Cells oblong or globose with a lamellate sheath
forming small colonies; colour, red-brown (Fig. 28). This alga along
with _Urococcus_ was found by Hue in the cephalodia of _Lepolichen
coccophora_, but whereas _Gloeocystis_ frequently occupies the
cephalodium alone, _Urococcus_ is always accompanied by _Scytonema_, the
normal gonidium of the cephalodium.
[Illustration: Fig. 29. A, _Trentepohlia umbrina_ Born.; B, _T. aurea_
Mart. × 300 (after Kütz.).]
[Illustration: Fig. 30. Example of _Cladophora_. _Cl. glomerata_ Kütz. A,
nat. size; B, × 85 (after West).]
Fam. TRENTEPOHLIACEAE. Filamentous and branched, the filaments short
and creeping or long and forming tufts and felts or cushions; colour,
brownish-yellow or reddish-orange.
TRENTEPOHLIA Born. Branching alternate; cells filled with red or orange
oil; no pyrenoids (Fig. 29). A large number of lichens are associated
with this genus: Pyrenulaceae, Arthoniaceae, Graphidaceae, Roccellaceae,
Thelotremaceae, Gyalectaceae and Coenogoniaceae, etc., in whole or in
part. Two species have been determined, _T. umbrina_ Born., the gonidium
of the Graphidaceae, and _T. aurea_ which is associated with the only
European _Coenogonium, C. ebeneum_ (Fig. 3). Deckenbach[287] claimed that
he had proved by cultures that _T. umbrina_ was a growth stage of _T.
aurea._
Fam. CLADOPHORACEAE. Filamentous, variously and copiously branched, the
cells rather large and multinucleate.
CLADOPHORA Kütz. Filaments branching, of one-cell rows, attached at the
base; colour, bright or dark green; mostly aquatic and marine (Fig. 30).
Only one lichen, _Racodium rupestre_, a member of the Coenogoniaceae,
is associated with _Cladophora_. It is a British lichen, and is always
sterile.
Fam. MYCOIDEACEAE. Epiphytic algae consisting of thin discs which are
composed of radiating filaments.
1. MYCOIDEA Cunningh. (Cephaleuros Kunze). In _Mycoidea parasitica_ the
filaments of the disc are partly erect and partly decumbent, reddish
to green (Fig. 31). It forms the gonidium of the parasitic lichen,
_Strigula complanata_, which was studied by Marshall Ward in Ceylon[288].
Zahlbruckner gives _Phyllactidium_ as an alternative gonidium of
Strigulaceae.
2. PHYCOPELTIS Millard. Disc a stratum one-cell thick, bearing seta,
adnate to the lower surface of the leaf, yellow-green in colour.
_Phycopeltis_ (Fig. 32) has been identified as the gonidium of _Strigula
complanata_ in New Zealand and of _Mazosia_ (Chiodectonaceae), a leaf
lichen from tropical America.
[Illustration: Fig. 31. _Mycoidea parasitica_ Cunningh. much magnified
(after Marshall Ward).]
There is some confusion as to the genera of algae that form the gonidia
of these epiphyllous lichens. _Phyllactidium_ given by Zahlbruckner as
the gonidium of all the Strigulaceae (except _Strigula_ in part) is
classified by de Toni[289] as probably synonymous with _Phycopeltis_
Millard, and as differing from _Mycoidea parasitica_ in the mode of
growth.
Fam. PRASIOLACEAE. Thallus filamentous, often expanded into broad sheets
by the fusion of the filaments in one plane.
PRASIOLA Ag. Thallus filamentous, of one-to many-cell rows, or widely
expanded (Fig. 33). The gonidium of Mastoidiaceae (Pyrenocarpeae).
[Illustration: Fig. 32. _Phycopeltis expansa_ Jenn. much magnified (after
Vaughan Jennings).]
[Illustration: Fig. 33. _Prasiola parietina_ Wille × 500 (after West).]
B. CHANGES INDUCED IN THE ALGA
_a_. MYXOPHYCEAE. Though, as a general rule, the alga is less affected
by its altered life-conditions than the fungus, yet in many instances
it becomes considerably modified in appearance. In species of the
genus _Pyrenopsis_—small gelatinous lichens—the alga is a _Gloeocapsa_
very similar to _G. magma_. In the open it forms small colonies of
blue-green cells surrounded by a gelatinous sheath which is coloured
red with gloeocapsin. As a gonidium lying towards or on the outside
of the granules composing the thallus, the red sheath of the cells
is practically unchanged, so that the resemblance to _Gloeocapsa_ is
unmistakable. In the inner parts of the thallus, the colonies are
somewhat broken up by the hyphae and the sheaths are not only less
evident but much more faintly coloured. In _Synalissa_, a minute shrubby
lichen which has the same algal constituent, the tissue of the thallus
is more highly evolved, and in it the red colour can barely be seen and
then only towards the outside; at the centre it disappears entirely. The
long chaplets of _Nostoc_ cells persist almost unchanged in the thallus
of the Collemaceae, but in heteromerous genera such as _Pannaria_ and
_Peltigera_ they are broken up, or they are coiled together and packed
into restricted areas or zones. The altered alga has been frequently
described as _Polycoccus punctiformis_. A similar modification occurs
in many cephalodia, so that the true affinity of the alga, in most
instances, can only be ascertained after free cultivation.
Bornet[290] has described in _Coccocarpia molybdaea_ the change that
the alga _Scytonema_ undergoes as the thallus develops: in very young
fronds the filaments of _Scytonema_ are unchanged and are merely enclosed
between layers of hyphae. At a later stage, with increase of the thallus
in thickness, the algal filaments are broken up, their covering sheath
disappears, and the cells become rounded and isolated. _Petractis_
(_Gyalecta_) _exanthematica_ has also a _Scytonema_ as gonidium, and
equally exact observations have been made by Fünfstück[291] on the
way it is transformed by symbiosis: with the exception of a very thin
superficial layer, the thallus is immersed in the rock and is permeated
by the alga to its lowest limits, 3 to 4 mm. below the surface,
_Petractis_ being a homoiomerous lichen. The _Scytonema_ trichomes
embedded in the rock become narrower, and the sheath, which in the
epilithic part of the thallus is 4µ wide, disappears almost entirely. The
green colour of the cells fades and septation is less frequent and less
regular. The filaments in that condition are very like oil-hyphae and can
only be distinguished as algal by staining reagents such as alkanna. They
never seem to be in contact with the fungal elements: there is no visible
appearance of parasitism nor even of consortism.
_b._ CHLOROPHYCEAE. As a rule the green-celled gonidium such as
_Protococcus_ is not changed in form though the colour may be less vivid,
but in certain lichens there do occur modifications in its appearance. In
_Micarea_ (_Biatorina_) _prasina_, Hedlund[292] noted that the gonidium
was a minute alga possessing a gelatinous sheath similar to that of a
_Gloeocapsa_. He isolated the alga, made artificial cultures and found
that, in the altered conditions, it gradually increased in size, threw
off the gelatinous sheath and developed into normal _Protococcus_ cells,
measuring 7 to 10µ in diameter. The gelatinous sheath was thus proved to
be merely a biological variation, probably of value to the lichen owing
to its capacity to imbibe and retain moisture. Zukal[293] also made
cultures of this alga, but wrongly concluded it was a _Gloeocystis_.
Moebius[294] has described the transformation from algae to lichen
gonidia in a species epiphytic on Orchids in Porto Rico. He had observed
that most of the leaves were inhabited by a membranaceous alga,
_Phyllactidium_, and that constantly associated with it were small scraps
of a lichen thallus containing isolated globose gonidia. The cells of
the alga, under the influence of the invading fungus, were, in this
case, formed into isolated round bodies which divided into four, each
daughter-cell becoming surrounded by a membrane and being capable, in
turn, of further division.
Frank[295] followed the change from a free alga to a gonidium in
_Chroolepus_ (_Trentepohlia_) _umbrinum_, as shown in the hypophloeodal
thalli of the Graphideae. The alga itself is frequent on beech bark,
where it forms wide-spreading brownish-red incrustations consisting of
short chains occasionally branched. The individual cells have thick
laminated membranes and vary in width from 20 µ to 37 µ. The free alga
constantly tends to penetrate below the cortical layers of the tree
on which it grows, and the immersed cells become not only longer and
of a thinner texture, but the characteristic red colour so entirely
disappears, that the growing penetrating apical cell may be light green
or almost colourless. As a lichen gonidium the alga undergoes even more
drastic changes: the red oily granules gradually vanish and the cells
become chlorophyll-green or, if any retain a bright colour, they are
orange or yellow. The branching of the chains is more regular, the cells
more elongate and narrower; usually they are about 13 to 21 µ long and
8 µ wide, or even less. Deeper down in the periderm, the chains become
disintegrated into separate units. Another notable alteration takes
place in the cell-membrane which becomes thin and delicate. It has,
however, been observed that if these algal cells reach the surface, owing
to peeling of the bark, etc., they resume the appearance of a normal
_Trentepohlia_.
In certain cases where two kinds of algae were supposed to be present in
some lichens, it has been proved that one species only is represented,
the difference in their form being caused by mechanical pressure of
the surrounding hyphae, as in _Endocarpon_ and _Staurothele_ where the
hymenial gonidia are cylindrical in form and much smaller than those of
the thallus. They were on this account classified by Stahl[296] under
a separate algal genus, _Stichococcus_, but they are now known to be
growth forms of _Protococcus_, the alga that is normally present in the
thallus. Similar variations were found by Neubner[297] in the gonidia
of the Caliciaceae, but, by culture experiments with the gonidia apart
from the hyphae, he succeeded in demonstrating transition forms in all
stages between the “_Pleurococcus_” cells and those of “_Stichococcus_,”
though the characters acquired by the latter are transmitted to following
generations. The transformation from spherical to cylindrical algal
cells had been also noted by Krabbe[298] in the young podetia of some
species of _Cladonia_, the change in form being due to the continued
pressure in one direction of the parallel hyphae.
Isolated algal cells have been observed within the cortex of various
lichens. They are carried thither by the hyphae from the gonidial zone
in the process of cortical formation, but they soon die off as in that
position they are deprived of a sufficiency of air and of moisture.
Forssell[299] found _Xanthocapsa_ cells embedded in the hymenium of
_Omphalaria Heppii_. They were similar to those of the thallus, but they
were not associated with hyphae and had undergone less change than the
thalline algae.
C. CONSTANCY OF ALGAL CONSTITUENTS
Lichen hyphae of one family or genus, as a rule, combine with the same
species of alga, and the continuity of genera and species is maintained.
There are, however, related lichens that differ chiefly or only in the
characters of the gonidia. Among such closely allied genera or sections
of genera may be cited _Sticta_ with bright-green algae and the section
_Stictina_ with blue-green; _Peltidea_ similarly related to _Peltigera_
and _Nephroma_ to _Nephromium_. In the genus _Solorina_, some of the
species possess bright-green, others blue-green algae, while in one, _S.
crocea_[300], there is an upper layer of small bright-green gonidia that
project in irregular pyramids into the upper cortex; while below these
there stretches a more or less interrupted band of blue-green _Nostoc_
cells. The two layers are usually separated by strands of hyphae, but
occasionally they come into close contact, and the hyphal filaments
pass from one zone to the other. In this genus cephalodia containing
blue-green _Nostoc_ are characteristic of all the “bright-green” species.
Harmand[301] has recorded the presence of two different types of gonidia
in _Lecanora atra_ f. _subgrumosa_; one of them, the normal _Protococcus_
alga of the species, the other, pale-blue-green cells of _Nostoc_
affinity.
Forssell[302] states that in _Lecanora_ (_Psoroma_) _hypnorum_, the
normal bright-green gonidia of some of the squamules may be replaced
by _Nostoc_. In that case they are regarded as cephalodia, though in
structure they exactly resemble the squamules of _Pannaria pezizoides_,
and Forssell considers that there is sufficient evidence of the identity
of the hyphal constituent in these two lichens, the alga alone being
different.
It may be that in Archilichens with a marked capacity to form a second
symbiotic union with blue-green algae, a tendency to revert to a
primitive condition is evident—a condition which has persisted wholly in
_Peltigera_ with its _Nostoc_ zone, but is manifested only by cephalodia
formation in the _Peltidea_ section of the genus. In this connection,
however, we must bear in mind Forssell’s view that it is the Archilichens
that are the more primitive[303].
The alien blue-green algae with their gelatinous sheaths are adapted
to the absorption and retention of moisture, and, in this way, they
doubtless render important service to the lichens that harbour them in
cephalodia.
D. DISPLACEMENT OF ALGAE WITHIN THE THALLUS
_a._ NORMAL DISPLACEMENT. Lindau[304] has contrasted the advancing
apical growth of the creeping alga _Trentepohlia_ with the stationary
condition of the unicellular species that multiply by repeated division
or by sporulation, and thus form more or less dense zones and groups of
gonidia in most lichens. The fungus in the latter case pushes its way
among the algae and breaks up the compact masses by a shoving movement,
thus letting in light and air. The growing hypha usually applies
itself closely round an algal cell, and secondary branches arise which
in time encircle it in a network of short cells. In the thallus of
_Variolaria_[305] the hyphae from the lower tissues, termed push-hyphae
by Nienburg[306], push their way into the algal groups and filaments
composed of short cells come to lie closely round the individual gonidia.
Continued growth is centrifugal, and the algae are carried outward with
the extension of the hyphae (Fig. 12). Cell-division is more active at
the periphery, that being the area of vigorous growth, and the algal
cells are, in consequence, generally smaller in that region than those
further back, the latter having entered more or less into a resting
condition, or, as is more probable, these smaller cells are aplanospores
not fully mature.
_b._ LOCAL DISPLACEMENT. Specimens of _Parmelia physodes_ were found
several times by Bitter, the grey-green surface of which was marbled
with whitish lines, caused by the absence of gonidia under these
lighter-coloured areas. The thallus was otherwise healthy as was
manifested by the freely fruiting condition: no explanation of the
phenomenon was forthcoming. Bitter compared the condition with the
appearance of lighter areas on the thallus of _Parmelia obscurata_.
Something of the same nature was observed on the thallus of a _Peltigera_
collected by F. T. Brooks near Cambridge. The marking took the form of a
series of concentric circles, starting from several centres. The darker
lines were found on examination to contain the normal blue-green algal
zone, while the colour had faded from the lighter parts. The cause of the
difference in colouration was not apparent.
E. NON-GONIDIAL ORGANISMS ASSOCIATED WITH LICHEN HYPHAE
Bonnier[307] made a series of cultures with lichen spores and green
cells other than those that form lichen gonidia. In one instance he
substituted _Protococcus botryoide_s for the normal gonidia of _Parmelia_
(_Xanthoria_) _parietina_; in another of his cultures he replaced
_Protococcus viridis_ by the filamentous alga _Trentepohlia abietina_.
In both cases the hyphae attached themselves to the green cells and a
certain stage of thallus formation was reached, though growth ceased
fairly early. Another experiment made with the large filaments of
_Vaucheria sessilis_ met with the same amount of success (Fig. 34). The
germinating hyphae attached themselves to the alga and grew all round it,
but there was no advance to tissue formation.
Cultures were also made with the protonema of mosses. Either spores of
mosses and lichens were germinated together, or lichen spores were sown
in close proximity to fully formed protonemata. The developing hyphae
seized on the moss cells and formed a network of branching anastomosing
filaments along the whole length of the protonema without, however,
penetrating the cells. If suitable algae were encountered, proper thallus
formation commenced, and Bonnier considers that the hyphae receive
stimulus and nourishment from the protonema sufficient to tide them
over a considerable period, perhaps until the algal symbiont is met. An
interesting variation was noted in connection with the cultures of _Mnium
hornum_[308]. If the protonema were of the usual vigorous type, the whole
length was encased by the hyphal network; but if it were delicate and
slender, the protoplasm collected in the cell that was touched by hyphae
and formed a sort of swollen thick-walled bud (Fig. 35). This new body
persisted when the rest of the filament and the hyphae had disappeared,
and, in favourable conditions, grew again to form a moss plant.
[Illustration: Fig. 34. Germinating hyphae of _Lecanora subfusca_ Ach.,
growing over the alga _Vaucheria sessilis_ DC., much magnified (after
Bonnier).]
F. PARASITISM OF ALGAE ON LICHENS
A curious instance of undoubted parasitism by an alga, not as in
_Strigula_ on one of the higher plants, but on a lichen thallus,
is recorded by Forssell[309]. A group of _Protococcus_-like cells
established on the thallus of _Peltigera_ had found their way into the
tissue, the underlying cortical cells having degenerated. The blue-green
cells of the normal gonidial layer had died off before their advance
but no zone was formed by the invading algae; they simply withdrew
nourishment and gave seemingly no return. The phenomenon is somewhat
isolated and accidental but illustrates the capacity of the alga to
absorb food supply from lichen hyphae.
[Illustration: Fig. 35. Pure culture of protonema of _Mnium hornum_ L.
with spores and hyphae of _Lecidea vernalis_ Ach. _a_,_a_,_a_, buds
forming × 150 (after Bonnier).]
An instance of epiphytic growth has also been recorded by
Zahlbruckner[310]. He found an alga, _Trentepohlia abietina_, covering
the thallus of a Brazilian lichen, _Parmelia isidiophora_, and growing so
profusely as to obscure the isidiose character towards the centre of the
thallus. There was no genetic connection of the alga with the lichen as
the former was not that of the lichen gonidium. Lichen thalli are indeed
very frequently the habitat of green algae, though their occurrence may
be and probably is accidental.