Wednesday, 29th September

After a very good sleep, I rose more refreshed than I had been for

some nights. We were now at but a little distance from the shore, and

saw the sea from our windows, which made our voyage seem nearer. Mr

M'Pherson's manners and address pleased us much. He appeared to be a

man of such intelligence and taste as to be sensible of the

extraordinary powers of his illustrious guest. He said to me, 'Dr

Johnson is an honour to mankind; and, if the expression may be used,

is an honour to religion.'

Col, who had gone yesterday to pay a visit at Camuscross, joined us

this morning at breakfast. Some other gentlemen also came to enjoy the

entertainment of Dr Johnson's conversation. The day was windy and

rainy, so that we had just seized a happy interval for our journey

last night. We had good entertainment here, better accommodation than

at Corrichatachin, and time enough to ourselves. The hours slipped

along imperceptibly. We talked of Shenstone. Dr Johnson said, he was a

good layer-out of land, but would not allow him to approach excellence

as a poet. He said, he believed he had tried to read all his Love

Pastorals, but did not get through them. I repeated the stanza,

'"She gazed as I slowly withdrew;

My path I could hardly discern;

So sweetly she bade me adieu,

I thought that she bade me return."'

He said, 'That seems to be pretty.' I observed that Shenstone, from

his short maxims in prose, appeared to have some power of thinking;

but Dr Johnson would not allow him that merit. He agreed, however,

with Shenstone, that it was wrong in the brother of one of his

correspondents to burn his letters; 'for,' said he, 'Shenstone was a

man whose correspondence was an honour.' He was this afternoon full of

critical severity, and dealt about his censures on all sides. He said,

Hammond's Love Elegies were poor things. He spoke contemptuously of

our lively and elegant, though too licentious, lyrick bard, Hanbury

Williams, and said, 'he had no fame, but from boys who drank with

him'.

While he was in this mood, I was unfortunate enough, simply perhaps,

but, I could not help thinking, undeservedly, to come within 'the

whiff and wind of his fell sword'. I asked him, if he had ever been

accustomed to wear a night-cap. He said 'No.' I asked, if it was best

not to wear one. JOHNSON. 'Sir, I had this custom by chance, and

perhaps no man shall ever know whether it is best to sleep with or

without a night-cap.' Soon afterwards he was laughing at some

deficiency in the Highlands, and said, 'One might as well go without

shoes and stockings.' Thinking to have a little hit at his own

deficiency, I ventured to add, 'or without a night-cap, sir'. But I

had better have been silent; for he retorted directly, 'I do not see

the connection there' (laughing). 'Nobody before was ever foolish

enough to ask whether it was best to wear a night-cap or not. This

comes of being a little wrong-headed.' He carried the company along

with him: and yet the truth is, that if he had always worn a

night-cap, as is the common practice, and found the Highlanders did

not wear one, he would have wondered at their barbarity; so that my

hit was fair enough.

The Journal of a Tour to the Hebrides with Samuel Johnson, LL.D. · 第 56 / 110 题