Mr. RUBY. Then he became——

Mr. GRIFFIN. Do you understand my question? In what connection would

you see him after you got out of school?

Mr. RUBY. I used to be a lifeguard at a swimming pool close to where

he lived and he used to come over there once in a great while, just a

few blocks from his house. And he used to—he was a Good Humor salesman,

and we would go out and see him where he parked his truck or something

once in a great while. But that was because he was more friendly with

other people than he was with me. In other words, I wasn’t one of his

buddies. I would go along just for the ride.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Did you do any business with him?

Mr. RUBY. I am coming to that. Then he became—he opened up the Mike

Shore Advertising and he is the one that was behind Earl Muntz, you

know, and the cars and the television. That is Michael Shore. And I

did some business with him along in manufacturing. He got into the

manufacturing of an item, a food seasoner. It was a large aluminum

needle and you filled it with some different meat flavors and you

injected it in the meat. Somebody talked him into it. He was doing

very well, and he invested in it. Anyhow, it wasn’t made correctly

so they couldn’t sell it, so he asked me since at that time I was in

manufacturing, if I could correct the defect so they could at least

sell them and market them, which I did. They shipped all these to me, I

don’t know how many thousand, 5,000 or 10,000, and we reworked them and

fixed them and sold them for him. Then not too long after that Muntz

practically went bankrupt, so he closed the Chicago office and moved

back to California. So, anyhow, I called Mike.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Let me ask you another question. From what you have said,

I take it that Mike Shore first had contacted your brother Jack or

somebody in Dallas?

Mr. RUBY. No, no, no.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Jack told you to call Mike Shore?

Mr. RUBY. Right.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Now, had Shore contacted Jack or what gave Jack the idea

of suggesting that you call Shore?

Mr. RUBY. Well, Jack knew that I knew Mike Shore, and he was, you

know—he had been in advertising, was the only one we knew that could

give us any advice as to what to do.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Had Jack had someone approach him in connection with a

life story or something like that?

Mr. RUBY. Yes; he said several people were trying to contact him

through Howard and wanted a life story.

Mr. GRIFFIN. The first you heard about this, though, was when Jack

called you and asked you to contact Mike Shore?

Mr. RUBY. Yes; as far as I know. Now, wait—I don’t know if he talked to

me or he talked to one of the members of the family, because we had so

many telephone calls from those first few days I can’t recall all of

them. But, anyhow, the word came to me to call Mike Shore and ask his

advice.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Now, do you recall how long after Oswald was shot that

this call of yours took place?

Mr. RUBY. Oh, just a day or two later, I think.

Mr. GRIFFIN. And I take it you did call Mike Shore?

Mr. RUBY. Yes; I did.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Did you call him in California?

Mr. RUBY. Yes; I called him in California.

Mr. GRIFFIN. And about how long did your conversation with Shore last?

Mr. RUBY. Several minutes.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Ten or fifteen minutes?

Mr. RUBY. I don’t know. I really don’t know. Anyhow, I don’t remember.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Now, tell us what that conversation was.

Mr. RUBY. Well, I mentioned that Jack had said that people were

interested in a story on Jack and Jack had said to contact him, ask

his advice. And so he says, “Gee, that is a coincidence,” he says,

“because I’ve got somebody sitting right here in my office that would

be the perfect man to do a story on Jack if one is going to be done.”

And he says, “His name is Billy Woodfield.” His real name is William

Woodfield. So he says, “I think you ought to come out here,” the

conversation got to that, “so we can talk it over.”

So I flew out there a day or two later.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Was that all there was to the conversation at that time?

Mr. RUBY. Yes; lawyers weren’t mentioned yet as far as I remember. I

don’t think we mentioned the lawyer in the first conversation.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Had you discussed with your family or with Tom Howard

before you called Mike Shore——

Mr. RUBY. Yes.

Mr. GRIFFIN. What had been your discussion about selling the life story

with your family and with Tom Howard?

Mr. RUBY. Well, the question came up that we would need money for a

good lawyer, and this was one of the solutions to raising money.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Before you called Mike Shore, are you saying that you had

discussed getting a lawyer other than Tom Howard, or when you use the

term good lawyer are you talking about paying Howard?

Mr. RUBY. No: we were talking about a lawyer other than Howard now.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Who had suggested that you should get a lawyer other than

Howard or how did that idea arise?

Mr. RUBY. That was, I think, between our family, the family itself.

Mr. GRIFFIN. And did you discuss this with Howard before you called

Mike Shore?

Mr. RUBY. Wait, you are ahead of me. The first conversation I didn’t

mention a lawyer to Mike Shore yet.

Mr. GRIFFIN. I realize that.

Mr. RUBY. Yes.

Mr. GRIFFIN. But I am still asking you, you had indicated to me that

the reason that you were calling Shore and thinking about a life story

was that you were going to need money for another lawyer. The life

story, as I understand it, is tied in with the idea of getting the

money for a lawyer, or was there another reason for selling the life

story?

Mr. RUBY. No; I think I talked to Tom Howard because we never heard

of him, of course. In the meantime, I think in conversations back and

forth, we talked with another lawyer there, somebody talked to him from

the family or maybe it was relayed through my sister Eva down there—and

I have a brother Sam in Dallas—do we need another lawyer. And then we

learned that they were already trying to get a lawyer.

Now, you must understand, we have to go back to Tom Howard. Tom Howard

is a bondsman in addition to being a lawyer. That is what he is noted

for there. So then I think I talked to this other lawyer, Stanley

Kaufman. He was my brother’s civil lawyer down there. And I asked him

if he knows a good criminal lawyer, and he says, no, he can’t recommend

anyone.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Let me interrupt you, Mr. Ruby.

Mr. RUBY. Excuse me. I can’t remember the exact sequence of all these

conversations, because they were going back and forth all day and night.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Maybe we can reconstruct it by asking you questions. From

what you have said, I take it that by the time you called or somebody

talked to Stanley Kaufman, the idea had been implanted that you would

need a lawyer other than Tom Howard.

Mr. RUBY. Yes.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Now, who had planted the idea? How did that idea develop

that you would need a lawyer other than Tom Howard?

Mr. RUBY. I don’t remember exactly, but it could have been even my

own thoughts, because a day or two after the shooting and the papers

started to print stories, and stories about Tom Howard, and I realized

who he was, and he was suspended at one time, I immediately thought

this was not a good lawyer to have for my brother.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Now, what was Jack’s original attitude, if you know, about

Tom Howard?

Mr. RUBY. He wasn’t too crazy about Tom Howard, as far as I could see,

from what he told me, because he said Tom Howard contradicted himself a

few times to him.

Mr. GRIFFIN. But did Jack, to your knowledge, develop the idea on

his own that he should get somebody other than Howard, or was this

suggestion raised to Jack?

Mr. RUBY. That I don’t know. You are asking me what his thoughts were.

I don’t know. I can’t answer that.

Mr. GRIFFIN. I didn’t know if you had contact with him or not. Now, to

your knowledge, were any other Dallas lawyers contacted besides Tom

Howard before the final team of Belli, Tonahill, and Burleson?

Mr. RUBY. Oh, yes; Belli was the main one, you know. He was the first

one.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Yes; but before Belli was brought in, were any other

Dallas lawyers, or Texas lawyers——

Mr. RUBY. Oh, yes; they talked, Howard—Howard and I discussed this,

and he said he needs help, he wouldn’t mind another good lawyer. So we

mentioned several names. He talked to Percy Foreman, and Percy Foreman,

he told me Percy Foreman wants $25,000 as a retainer before he will

even step into the case. So he says, “I know you don’t have that kind

of money so that eliminates him.”

However, later, upon talking to Foreman, he denies that. He said he

only asked for $2,500.

Anyhow, they contacted Stanley Kaufman. Stanley Kaufman contacted Fred

Brunner. He is a Dallas criminal lawyer, very good. And the story I got

is he says, “Okay, I’ll handle the case. I will be right down to take

over.”

He never showed up. We found out why. He is Henry Wade’s best friend,

and so it just wouldn’t work out. He just couldn’t take it. Although he

never called, we understood that that is what happened, because they

down there found out that he was Henry Wade’s best friend, and so he

probably for one reason or another, he couldn’t take the case.

Mr. GRIFFIN. You don’t have any personal knowledge, however, that the

friendship with Howard was the reason that Brunner didn’t take the case?

Mr. HUBERT. With Wade.

Mr. GRIFFIN. With Wade. You don’t know this?

Mr. RUBY. No; I talked to Brunner myself when I was down there later

on. Brunner said something to the effect—I don’t remember the exact

words. I ran into him in the county jail. I don’t remember what he said.

Mr. GRIFFIN. Did he say anything to you about why he didn’t get into

the case?

Mr. RUBY. I am just trying to, if I can find the words or something

close to what he said. We just met in the hallway, and he said—I can’t

recall that conversation at all.

Warren Commission (14 of 26): Hearings Vol. XIV (of 15) · 第 198 / 309 题