1. The sixteen lines appended to the Tale of the Nun’s Priest
seem, as Tyrwhitt observes, to commence the prologue to the
succeeding Tale — but the difficulty is to determine which that
Tale should be. In earlier editions, the lines formed the opening
of the prologue to the Manciple’s Tale; but most of the
manuscripts acknowledge themselves defective in this part, and
give the Nun’s Tale after that of the Nun’s Priest. In the Harleian
manuscript, followed by Mr Wright, the second Nun’s Tale, and
the Canon’s Yeoman’s Tale, are placed after the Franklin’s tale;
and the sixteen lines above are not found — the Manciple’s
prologue coming immediately after the “Amen” of the Nun’s
Priest. In two manuscripts, the last line of the sixteen runs thus:
“Said unto the Nun as ye shall hear;” and six lines more
evidently forged, are given to introduce the Nun’s Tale. All this
confusion and doubt only strengthen the certainty, and deepen
the regret, that “The Canterbury Tales” were left at Chaucer’s,
death not merely very imperfect as a whole, but destitute of
many finishing touches that would have made them complete so
far as the conception had actually been carried into
performance.