1. This tale is believed by Tyrwhitt to have been taken, with no
material change, from the “Confessio Amantis” of John Gower,
who was contemporary with Chaucer, though somewhat his
senior. In the prologue, the references to the stories of Canace,
and of Apollonius Tyrius, seem to be an attack on Gower, who
had given these tales in his book; whence Tyrwhitt concludes
that the friendship between the two poets suffered some
interruption in the latter part of their lives. Gower was not the
inventor of the story, which he found in old French romances,
and it is not improbable that Chaucer may have gone to the
same source as Gower, though the latter undoubtedly led the
way.
(Transcriber’s note: later commentators have identified the
introduction describing the sorrows of poverty, along with the
other moralising interludes in the tale, as translated from “De
Contemptu Mundi” (“On the contempt of the world”) by Pope
Innocent.)
2. Transcriber’ note: This refers to the game of hazard, a dice
game like craps, in which two (“ambes ace”) won, and eleven
(“six-cinque”) lost.