APPENDIX II

THE ANTEDILUVIAN KINGS OF BEROSSUS AND

THE SUMERIAN DYNASTIC LIST

It may be of assistance to the reader to repeat in tabular form the

equivalents to the mythical kings of Berossus which are briefly

discussed in Lecture I. In the following table the two new equations,

obtained from the earliest section of the Sumerian Dynastic List, are in

upper-case.(1) The established equations to other names are in normal

case, while those for which we should possibly seek other equivalents

are enclosed within brackets.(2) Aruru has not been included as a

possible equivalent for {'Aloros}.(3)

1. {'Aloros}

2. {'Alaparos (? 'Adaparos)}, _Alaporus_, _Alapaurus_ (Adapa)

3. {'Amelon, 'Amillaros}, _Almelon_ (Amêlu)

4. {'Ammenon} ENMENUNNA

5. {Megalaros, Megalanos}, _Amegalarus_

6. {Daonos, Daos} ETANA

7. {Euedorakhos, Euedoreskhos}, _Edoranchus_ Enmeduranki

8. {'Amemphinos}, _Amemphsinus_ (Amêl-Sin)

9. {'Otiartes (? 'Opartes)} (Ubar-Tutu)

10. {Xisouthros, Sisouthros, Sisithros} Khasisatra, Atrakhasis(4)

(1) For the royal names of Berossus, see _Euseb. chron. lib.

pri._, ed. Schoene, cols. 7 f., 31 ff. The latinized

variants correspond to forms in the Armenian translation of

Eusebius.

(2) For the principal discussions of equivalents, see

Hommel, _Proc. Soc. Bibl. Arch._, Vol. XV (1893), pp. 243

ff., and _Die altorientalischen Denkmäler und das Alte

Testament_ (1902), pp. 23 ff.; Zimmern, _Die Keilinschriften

und das Alte Testament_, 3rd ed. (1902), pp. 531 ff.; and

cf. Lenormant, _Les origines de l'histoire_, I (1880), pp.

214 ff. See also Driver, _Genesis_, 10th ed. (1916), p. 80

f.; Skinner, _Genesis_, p. 137 f.; Ball, _Genesis_, p. 50;

and Gordon, _Early Traditions of Genesis_, pp. 46 ff.

(3) There is a suggested equation of Lal-ur-alimma with

{'Aloros}.

(4) The hundred and twenty "sars", or 432,000 years assigned

by Berossus for the duration of the Antediluvian dynasty,

are distributed as follows among the ten kings; the numbers

are given below first in "sars", followed by their

equivalents in years within brackets: 1. Ten "sars"

(36,000); 2. Three (10,800); 3. Thirteen (46,800); 4. Twelve

(43,200); 5. Eighteen (64,800); 6. Ten (36,000); 7. Eighteen

(64,800); 8. Ten (36,000); 9. Eight (28,800); 10. Eighteen

(64,800).

For comparison with Berossus it may be useful to abstract from the

Sumerian Dynastic List the royal names occurring in the earliest

extant dynasties. They are given below with variant forms from

duplicate copies of the list, and against each is added the number of

years its owner is recorded to have ruled. The figures giving the

total duration of each dynasty, either in the summaries or under the

separate reigns, are sometimes not completely preserved; in such cases

an x is added to the total of the figures still legible. Except in

those cases referred to in the foot-notes, all the names are written

in the Sumerian lists without the determinative for "god".

KINGDOM OF KISH

(23 kings; 18,000 + x years, 3 months, 3 days)

. . .(1)

8. (. . .) 900(?) years

9. Galumum, Kalumum 900 "

10. Zugagib, Zugakib 830 "

11. Arpi, Arpiu, Arbum 720 "

12. Etana(2) 635 (or 625) years

13. Pili . . .(3) 410 years

14. Enmenunna, Enmennunna(4) 611 "

15. Melamkish 900 "

16. Barsalnunna 1,200 "

17. Mesza(. . .) (. . .) "

. . .(5)

22. . . . 900 years

23. . . . 625 "

KINGDOM OF EANNA (ERECH)(6)

(About 10-12 kings; 2,171 + x years)

1. Meskingasher 325 years

2. Enmerkar 420 "

3. Lugalbanda(7) 1,200 "

4. Dumuzi(8) (i.e. Tammuz) 100 "

5. Gishbilgames(9) (i.e. Gilgamesh) 126 (or 186) years

6. (. . .)lugal (. . .) years

. . .(10)

KINGDOM OF UR

(4 kings; 171 years)

1. Mesannipada 80 years

2. Meskiagnunna 30 "

3. Elu(. . .) 25 "

4. Balu(. . .) 36 "

KINGDOM OF AWAN

(3 kings; 356 years)

. . .(11)

(1) Gap of seven, or possibly eight, names.

(2) The name Etana is written in the lists with and without

the determinative for "god".

(3) The reading of the last sign in the name is unknown. A

variant form of the name possibly begins with Bali.

(4) This form is given on a fragment of a late Assyrian copy

of the list; cf. _Studies in Eastern History_, Vol. III, p.

143.

(5) Gap of four, or possibly three, names.

(6) Eanna was the great temple of Erech. In the Second

Column of the list "the kingdom" is recorded to have passed

from Kish to Eanna, but the latter name does not occur in

the summary.

(7) The name Lugalbanda is written in the lists with and

without the determinative for "god".

(8) The name Dumuzi is written in the list with the

determinative for "god".

(9) The name Gishbilgames is written in the list with the

determinative for "god".

(10) Gap of about four, five, or six kings.

(11) Wanting.

At this point a great gap occurs in our principal list. The names of

some of the missing "kingdoms" may be inferred from the summaries, but

their relative order is uncertain. Of two of them we know the duration,

a second Kingdom of Ur containing four kings and lasting for a hundred

and eight years, and another kingdom, the name of which is not

preserved, consisting of only one king who ruled for seven years. The

dynastic succession only again becomes assured with the opening of the

Dynastic chronicle published by Père Scheil and recently acquired by the

British Museum. It will be noted that with the Kingdom of Ur the

separate reigns last for decades and not hundreds of years each, so that

we here seem to approach genuine tradition, though the Kingdom of Awan

makes a partial reversion to myth so far as its duration is concerned.

The two suggested equations with Antediluvian kings of Berossus both

occur in the earliest Kingdom of Kish and lie well within the Sumerian

mythical period. The second of the rulers concerned, Enmenunna

(Ammenon), is placed in Sumerian tradition several thousand years before

the reputed succession of the gods Lugalbanda and Tammuz and of the

national hero Gilgamesh to the throne of Erech. In the first lecture

some remarkable points of general resemblance have already been pointed

out between Hebrew and Sumerian traditions of these early ages of the

world.

Legends of Babylon and Egypt in Relation to Hebrew Tradition · 第 35 / 36 题