CHAPTER XVII.

“THE OUTCRY AGAINST ME IS LOUDER THAN EVER.”

The little estate, which was being formed on the banks of the Hamble,

was now beginning to wear a face of its own, in the spring of 1808.

The consolidation of two or three small farms, and the replanting of

a large portion of the ground, with oak, thorn, ash, acacia, &c., was

the outline of a plan, which now showed some promise of a return. Mr.

Cobbett’s favourite notion had been, that a fair provision for his

family might be thus made. And now, after three full seasons, the new

plantations had entirely fulfilled the expectation.[1] They were

flourishing and healthy, and a large supply of material for the London

stick-makers appears as part of this year’s cropping. In May, there is

another large parcel of land added, containing sixty-seven acres of

wood, besides arable land and water-meadow.

All this makes the need of any visit to London still more irksome; and

Mr. Wright has to do the honours for his leader. There is talk of a

grand demonstration at Westminster, to celebrate the anniversary of

Burdett’s election; but Mr. Cobbett doesn’t care to be dragged away

from his beloved fields into “the cursed smoke,” as he calls it:--

“… Go to the committee by all means. Let us suffer no little

slights to interfere with our public duty. That is the way with

those only who are actuated by selfish motives. I shall be in

town on Thursday night next, or on Saturday night.… If I find

all to be good men and true, we will make such a stir as has

not for sometime been made. All the gentlemen whom I meet with,

are loud in Sir Francis Burdett’s praise. The motion about the

cashiering of offices has gained him thousands of valuable

friends. So bent was I upon calling for a purgation of that

d---- House, that I was resolved to petition alone, if any one

would have presented my petition. The nation is heart-sick of

it. It is impossible for both factions united to calumniate

our motives, if we proceed as we ought, and do not mix with

men of bad character. There is one Hunt,[2] the Bristol man.

Beware of him. He rides about the country with a * * the wife

of another man, having deserted his own. A sad fellow! Nothing

to do with him.

“P.S.--I will write to Sir J. Astley. I am very sorry for his

misfortune indeed. I want very much to see some man who has

planted upon a large scale. Cutting upon a large scale is the

order of the day here.”

* * * * *

“… Now, as to the dinner, it is dreadfully distressing for

me to go; for, the season being so backward, has thrown the

oak-cutting into this week and the two succeeding ones, and

you will easily guess how necessary my personal attendance is,

while it lasts. Yet I will go, if alive and well; but I must go

up on the Sunday, and come back on the Tuesday, for I cannot

be longer absent. I have many reasons for going as well as for

staying; but the former prevail.

“I have not sold my second lot of timber that I had marked

while I was in London. When I come to see it again, and to

consider that the 300 that would have sold for a thousand

pounds were gaining in growth above 150_l._ a year, I could

not bring myself to commit such flagrant murder of property.

The new purchase has upon it about 6000 trees, that now cost

me from a shilling to two-and-sixpence apiece, and that in

twenty years’ time will be worth 3_l._ apiece, at the very

least. This, I think, is the best way of insuring a fortune for

children.”

“Only the day before yesterday, I was bent upon going to town

for the 23rd, and had written to Mr. H---- of Fontington, to

meet me there about the farm. But now I find that it cannot

be, without an inconvenience and risk which, I am sure, no

friend would wish me to incur, especially as my journey would

produce little more than my own gratification at witnessing the

assemblage of so many public-spirited men. You know very well

that this is my harvest, and that this year I have a tenfold

harvest. I allude to the oak-tree cutting, which must be done

while the sap is in the flood of its spring, or not at all;

and the bark, you will observe, is of the little thinners that

I am cutting upon my own account, worth three times as much

as the timber. In the average of years, this sap season lasts

a good month; but the very extraordinary backwardness of this

spring, and the very rare hot weather that has come on after

it, has made the season last only three weeks, a fortnight of

which has already passed. Owing to this, I, who waited till the

several companies of fellers had finished the great timber, am

obliged to fall to work on Saturday, instead of waiting till

next Tuesday. I am compelled to set sixty men on at once, and

as mine is a work of thinning, it will require my constant

attendance from the time the men begin till they leave off.

I must be with them to mark the trees; to see the effect of

taking out some, before we take out others; and, in short,

the health and growth, as well as the future beauty, of 100

acres of the finest woods in England depend upon my personal

attendance between Saturday and Wednesday next. Nothing ever

was more pointedly perverse; but I trust that all those who

wished me to attend the dinner will be convinced that I ought

not to leave home at this time.

“I am of opinion, too (and I should like to hear what the Major

says of the matter), that I am of most weight as a _spectator_

and _comment-maker_. This way my word and opinion pass for a

good deal; but I am not clear that whatever good I could do as

an _agitator_, would not be more than counterbalanced by the

loss of weight in the other character. I know it is the opinion

of Sir Francis, that to put me in parliament would be to lessen

my weight; and, really, I think that the same reasoning will

apply to the other case. In fact, we cannot _act_ and _write_

too, with so much advantage. The way in which I am most able to

aid the cause of the country is to sit quietly here, and give

my sincere and unbiased opinions upon all that passes which

appears worthy of particular notice.

“In the copy last sent you, there is the phrase ‘_old_ G.

Rose.’ Upon second thoughts, it may as well be left out. It is,

perhaps, right to cease to use that, and the like phrases. One

puts them down under the influence of indignant feelings, but

they probably do more harm than good.”

Although he does not go up to the festival at the “Crown and Anchor,”

Mr. Cobbett does justice to the opportunity as a “comment-maker.” In

supporting Burdett’s views, as expressed at the meeting, he remarks:--

“I am persuaded that if the nation were polled, leaving out

those who have an interest in corruption, there would appear

a majority of a thousand to one in favour of the reform,

which he recommends, and which, in their better days, had

been recommended by Mr. Pitt and Mr. Wilberforce.… A minister

may desire to do that which is for the good of the country;

he may have an anxious desire to promote its happiness (and,

his errors aside, I do think that Mr. Perceval is such a

man); but, before he can stir an inch, he has the feelings

and interests of the borough-mongers to consult; he has party

to counteract, and faction to mollify. How much more at his

ease must such a man feel: what a load would be removed from

his mind, if he could step into a House of Commons freely

chosen, and having no object in view but that of agreeing to

what they thought good, and opposing what they thought bad! A

House of Commons in which there would be no strife for office

or emolument, and in which, nine times out of ten, truth would

prevail.”

There is an excursion to Cornwall, in August, on occasion of the

trial of Sir Christopher Hawkins and others, at Penrhyn, for corrupt

practices at a past election. The electors of Westminster are forthwith

treated to a new lecture, upon the prevalence of the “vile traffic”

in seats; and Mr. Wright is favoured with an account of the aspect of

things and people as they appear from behind the scenes. One remark is

interesting: “Notwithstanding all I have said about the lawyers lately,

the whole of them have treated me with distinguished civility.”

* * * * *

The following, dated 17th September, 1808, is worth preserving, as

upon a subject concerning which Mr. Cobbett had some real practical

knowledge:--

“The essay upon planting, which you sent me some time ago, is

very well done, and is particularly interesting to me. It

establishes, from experience, what I had before made up my mind

to, in theory. Certainly, there is no way in which the very

best lands are to be employed to so much ultimate advantage.

If your friend should be actually about planting himself, my

experiments, in a year or two, may be of great use to him. Of

two things, however, I can now speak with positive certainty;

viz., that to obtain quick produce, the trees planted should

be small; deciduous trees from the seed-bed, and firs not

above a foot or eighteen inches high. And, that all deciduous

trees, of whatever size, should be, after planting, cut down

to the ground. Last year (March, 1807), I planted ten planes,

about eight feet high. Some of them shot very well, others not,

their tops dying, and the new shoots breaking out some distance

from the branches. One of them, in the month of May, 1807, we

thought was dead; but my man, thinking that there was some life

in the root, cut it off within two inches of the ground.… This

tree is now twelve feet high, a beautiful straight stem, with

proper side-branches, while the highest of the others (with

heads too large for their bodies) is not more than ten feet

high. I have proved the same with all sorts of deciduous trees.

Those who want, quickly, fine plantations about their houses,

should plant and cut down to the ground; and of course those

should do it who plant for profit. If this were done, you would

not see so many acres of poor, sickly, dead-topped things,

called shrubberies, about new-built houses. A tree planted

large, and its head left on, is a continual eyesore, until it

be rooted up. I transplanted some American walnuts last March;

they were three feet high in the seed-bed. Some I cut down

before I planted them, the rest not; and the former are now as

high as the latter, with fine straight stems, while the others

are top-heavy, and must be cut down at last, in order to make

them grow freely.…

“The rascals in Portugal have made a pretty mess of it! To be

sure, one cannot say how they have been criminal; but to me

it appears that both our admiral and our general ought to be

hanged.…”

This last paragraph refers to the convention at Cintra, by which the

French army was permitted to retire from Portugal in British ships.

This advantage, granted to the ubiquitous enemy, caused a great popular

outcry in England. The Hampshire people had a grand demonstration at

Winchester, in November; in which occasion Mr. Cobbett took a prominent

part.

Another useful scheme is now in preparation. In his reading,

necessitated by the production of the “Parliamentary History,” Mr.

Cobbett had found the need of an accessible edition of the State

Trials; and he resolved to supply the want by reproducing them, with

additional matter, in the belief that other students of history would

find it of advantage. Mr. Wright entered warmly into the notion,

and procured the services of a gentleman to act as editor. This was

Thomas Bayly Howell, whose name has sometimes been associated with the

work.[3] But there seems to have early arisen some dissatisfaction

with him, and the engagement went very near to be cancelled. The

following has the first of several references to this matter:--

“Enclosed is a letter for you to read, and then send. I cannot

consent to a partnership. Upon reading my letter, you will

see what difficulties it must lead to. Only think of having

another person invested with a right, a legal right, to make us

account,--_us_, whose accounts the devil himself would never

unravel. I would not take such a weight upon my mind for all

the profits of all the books in the universe. No, no: you and

I were never made to have our accounts examined by anybody but

ourselves. Besides, you know what _all_ authors are. They are

all impatient for sale. But I need say no more. My letter will

adjust everything, I am certain.…

“… I thank you for the caricature. One would suppose that I

had given the hint myself, and, indeed, I am afraid the town

will say so. But, d---- the town! I care not what it says or

thinks of me.… We shall have, I think, a blazing meeting at

Winchester, and I have written to Finnerty to come down. Mind

Deverell. Never say anything to him that you do not wish the

world to know. He is a trading politician,--a mere party agent.

I have several letters from very respectable men in the county

intimating their wish to join me; particularly from Mr. Lowth

(a son of Bishop Lowth), a man of great property, and not less

respectability.…

“… William writes me a letter every week, copies a page of the

history of England every day, reads my part of the _Register_

every week, and is to get as far as the Rule of Three,

complete, by Christmas. He rode from school to Weyhill Fair,

and back, in a day; and he frequently rides to Winchester by

himself, puts his horse up at the inn, and, when he has done

his business, goes off home again. He is not yet ten years

old. What a base thing it would be to put such a boy to have

outlandish words flogged into him by an old dotard in a big

white wig! Why, if you were to put one of these * * * upon a

horse, he would fall off into the dirt! I will, if I live,

teach William to shave himself, and that will be much more

useful to him than Latin and Greek. I think of sending Nancy

for a year to the nuns at Winchester, where they teach people

to talk French and make puddings.”

“… We have had a good meeting, and Mr. Finnerty[4] will be

with you with the account of it, some time early to-morrow. I

missed by a mere hair carrying a petition, upon independent

grounds, against both parties … the Whigs, with their lords and

baronets, had been a week preparing their address; mine was

done in Finnerty’s room, while he was getting his breakfast;

and in I went to the hall without knowing any soul on my side

but Mr. Smith, Farmer Mears, about ten other yeomen who went to

dine with me, and Mr. Baker, who very boldly and well seconded

my motions.”

“… I have had letters from all parts of the country beseeching

me to persevere.…”

Concerning the forthcoming “State Trials:”--

“I must confess that I am less pleased with this thing than I

should have been, if it had remained solely in your hands. I

very much question whether Mr. H.’s taste is so good as your

own; and I am quite sure that we shall derive no comfort from

any connexion with an author.

“But it is too late to reflect; we will go on as well as we

can. Only mind to be always upon your guard against letting

him assume anything like a dictatorial tone. Keep up your

own consequence; for I know that your modest merit is not

very well calculated to resist the encroachments of conceited

importance.… Be sure to tell him none of our political secrets.

Suffer no inquiries into our affairs. Let him see no copy of

mine, or my correspondents. Tell him of none of our intentions

about anything. I know how easy it is for any one to worm

himself into your unsuspecting breast; and, therefore, I give

these cautions. I think I perceive, in his letters, a rather

consequential air. But I am resolved to have no partner, nor

any one to give me advice, except yourself. We have gone on so

happily, and so advantageously, by ourselves, that I am really

in a state of alarm at the prospect of admitting anything like

an associate. It must not be.…”

A vacancy in the representation of Hampshire brings another county

assemblage at Winchester; on which occasion Mr. Cobbett requires each

candidate to take a pledge, that, if elected, he would never accept

the public money as long as he lived; and would, moreover, use every

endeavour to obtain redress of the public grievances, especially that

trying one of having their money “voted away by those, amongst whom

there are many who receive part of that money.”

“… The meeting at Winchester was very large, and consisted of

almost the whole of the people of considerable property. Rose

and his son were deterred from appearing at the castle. The

speech was infinitely better than the _report_. I made use

of no notes, except as far as related to the sums. Not the

smallest hesitation from beginning to end; and, owing to the

strength of my voice and the clearness of my articulation,

every word I said was heard by the man the most distant from

me. The effect was very great. I spoke three-quarters of an

hour with very little interruption indeed, notwithstanding I

spoke to a party assembly, hostile to me, as far as party could

influence men. I wish you could have seen how _little_ the

_great_ looked after the speech had been made! They went up to

the castle swaggering, and in crowds; they came sneaking back

in ones and twos. Many of them had the meanness to compliment

me upon my speech. I was invited to dinner by several; but I

went to my inn and dined with Mr. Baker, another neighbouring

clergyman, and Dr. Mitford, and then set off home.

“No, be in no alarm about my hazarding my reputation and

happiness by standing as a candidate for this county, or

for any other place. That I never will be. If any body of

electors, anywhere, have a mind to choose me, without giving

me any trouble, I will serve; but at this time, I have not the

least desire for that; on my own account, I should wish not;

but I am, in such a case, not to consider myself only. I feel

that I should have power to serve with great effect; and I

shall never, I hope, be backward to make any useful sacrifice.

But I never will ask anybody to elect me.

“The boys have met me at Winchester sometimes; and it is no

bad school for them. While I was speaking, I saw in the crowd

several persons from Farnham, whom I had never seen before,

since I was their playmate. I saw many to whom I used, when

a boy, to make a very low bow. Lord Temple came and shook

hands, even after the speech. And I must say that I think

Mr. Herbert[5] a very modest young man. In one part of my

speech, an attorney of the Rose party, who stood just under

the window, made an attempt to excite a clamour; but I fixed

my eye upon him, and, pointing my hand downright, and making a

sort of chastising motion, said, ‘Peace, babbling slave!’ which

produced such terror amongst others, that I met with no more

interruption.…”

That Mr. Cobbett was unwilling to join in a cry against a public

character, without reason or justice, was often manifest. His entire

freedom from party bias, as such, accounts for the frequent distrust

which he inspired, at the same time that it helped to keep away from

him the temptation to hunt a man down merely because he was an

opponent. For example, he did not readily give ear to the charge made

against the Duke of York on the part of Major Hogan, although he was,

at the very time, raising the question of the Duke’s exorbitant income.

Mr. Cobbett could be just, and loyal too. This story of Hogan’s might

suit the tribe of malignant, unreasoning scribblers; but he has no idea

of weakening his own writings by an appeal to what looks uncommonly

like an invention. The _Register_ holds out several warnings to the

Major; and Cobbett tells Mr. Wright more plainly that he believes

“Major Hogan has certainly told a d---- lie, and ought to be exposed.…

As for Hague,[6] he really seems to have courted a jail.”

He presently adds:--

“They are fools, however, for touching him. But thus they will

go on to the end of the chapter. _Force_, _force_, that is all

their reliance. How much better to do as I do--let slander work

itself dead!

“… Bagshaw’s way is to be very quiet: when any one mentions

the matter to him, to say that he did as others do, sold the

book because it was called for. This prosecution is the very

foolishest thing that the Duke of York ever was advised to

do. Had he not begun this, Hogan would have gone nearly to

whitewash him.… Poor Finnerty! what the devil did he suffer

himself to be so provoked for? I hope he will not incur a

prosecution for Hogan.…

“As to Howell, I always was afraid of him. I know that he is

what the French call ‘_un homme à grandes pretensions_;’ as,

indeed, all your authors are.… They think that every book that

is printed is so much money coined. They take the price, the

full retail price, of a volume, say a guinea-and-a-half, then

they take the number of copies, and hence they reckon that the

bookseller has so many guineas and halves in his drawer, the

moment the book is printed. You cannot beat this out of their

brains. They will have it so. Then they are full of their

college conceit, which is so intolerable.… With such people,

a partnership would be, for you and me, a most uncomfortable

thing. I greatly approve of the scheme of a ‘fag;’ and as to

expense, four guineas a week would be cheap. But he must work

and be obedient.… I would sooner give an additional guinea

a week on the score of _obedience_, than on the score of

_talent_: though there must be considerable talent too. If you

can get rid of H., I shall be very happy. I know what your

college gentlemen are. They always have, and will have, the

insolence to think themselves our betters; and our superior

talents, and industry, and power, and weight, only excite their

envy. I am heartily sorry we ever had anything to do with H.

All this may blow off; but I shall never have confidence in

him.…

“I will write to the major,[7] and to Holt White, upon the

subject of the Trials. Two better men there are not in all

England. The major is the very best writer that I know, though

he has scarcely a drop of blood in his veins. Oh, that my mind,

at his age, may be like his!

“Be sure to send off _Register_ to Lord Cochrane, up to this

time. He is not come home. And no one can tell when he will.

Pray do not neglect this a day. I should like him to see that I

did justice to him in this country. He, after all, is the best

member for Westminster.

“Nancy will copy the manuscript of which you spoke lately. She

copied the whole of the Winchester proceedings, with only three

errors.”

The dissatisfaction with Mr. Howell would appear to have arisen

partly from an extreme slackness in providing “copy;” and, with

this, a disposition to consider his own remuneration as of the first

importance. The difficulty, however, did blow over.

The following refers to a letter of Major Cartwright’s on the affairs

of Spain:--

“… Now, as to the major’s letter. Room I am ready to spare him

for four or five columns. But, if you have the smallest doubt

upon the libel subject, do not put it in. Mark well every

word relating to the Parliament. Ferdinand, mind, must not be

libelled; and _anything is a libel_. If you can, by leaving

out, or altering, or adding, or qualifying, make it quite safe,

put the letter in; but not else.…”

This one appeared in the _Register_, but with reference to a succeeding

letter:--

“… Upon looking at the major’s last letter, page 944, I am

induced now to tell you not to put in his letter, if there be

the smallest thing doubtful in it. It may suit him to accuse

the judges, and the Attorney-General: _me_ it does not. I

should be more afraid of that letter than of anything I ever

published in my life. They would never touch a hair of _his_

head. Therefore, mind!”

The fatal news of Corunna came, and routed up the nation once more, in

the course of January. Two of Mrs. Cobbett’s brothers were with the

forces there, and no tidings had come from them:--

“Mrs. Cobbett and all of us join in best thanks to you for

your kindness and anxiety, in which you are never wanting, and

which, at this horrible hour, are so peculiarly acceptable and

grateful.… Poor Palmer! I can easily conceive what he must

feel, having myself held a dying son in my arms. Mrs. Cobbett

and Ellen, both of whom love their brothers very dearly, are

almost bursting with grief and apprehension. Indeed, I feel

most sensibly myself. The whole nation will be in mourning.”

The two brothers, Tom and Frederick Reid, are safe, however. Little

Nancy writes thus to Mr. Wright:--

“DEAR SIR,--My papa being very busy, he has desired me to write

to you and thank you for the trouble you have respecting my

uncles, and to tell you he went yesterday afternoon in a great

hurry to Portsmouth, thinking they might be there, where he met

with Colonel Harding, commander of the artillery; who told him

that they were gone to Plymouth, and that they were both well

at Corunna when he came away, and that they were not in the

action, neither have they been much engaged in active service,

as some have. And, indeed, mama and papa feel very much

surprised and indignant at not having heard from them at all,

knowing that they have been at Corunna almost all the time,

and having had so many opportunities (which they must have

had) of writing either to papa or mama. Papa is so much vexed,

that he says now, if he had known they had been at Corunna all

this time, he would not have gone to Portsmouth after them as

he did. The colonel, he said, told him, if they came there,

he would send them over to Botley directly. While papa was

there, he found out some officers of the 10th dragoons: he went

directly, and sent in his name by a waiter, and begged to know

whether Major Palmer was there, or whether he was safe. Upon

hearing their major’s name, two or three came to him and told

him he was safe at Plymouth, which was good hearing. Mama will

be very much obliged to you if you will have the goodness to

send her down a box of the biscuits you have gotten several

times; they are to be got at the corner of Bond Street, in

Piccadilly. She is quite ashamed to trouble you; but a lady,

one of the Miss Boxalls, is coming here to stay some time next

week, and she never eats bread, always those biscuits; and

there are none to be got in Southampton. Mama and papa desire

to be very kindly remembered to you. Excuse haste. I remain,

&c.,

“ANNE COBBETT.”

The very interesting inquiry into the private affairs of the Duke

of York was perilous to editors and pamphleteers. Mr. Wright

sends word down to Botley of his increasing fears lest his chief

should be compromised; and not without reason. The exasperation of

ministerialists was at its height. Their writers brought forth wild

imputations against the opposition scribblers, and twisted and tortured

their language and their meaning. In vain, however; facts could not be

gainsaid, and upon facts alone they relied. The _Examiner_ which was

then young, got into trouble over Major Hogan; the _Morning Chronicle_

was in danger. But nothing could stop the ball which Colonel Wardle had

set rolling.

And, just as Mr. Cobbett had hesitated over Major Hogan, he is still

as cautious as ever concerning Wardle; and wants to know, first, his

correspondent’s opinion as to Wardle’s capability to bring forward

proof of his charges, before entering the lists himself. Yet, the game

being started, he laughs away fear; and, acknowledging the kindness

of Mr. Wright’s expressions of anxiety, he says he “must stand the

brunt. No flinching would either be honourable or politic.” He will

defy prosecution, rather than give up the fight, much as he “loves his

fields and woods.”

One singular incident of this period is the case of Miss Taylor; a

lady who had, unfortunately for herself, to give evidence of her

acquaintanceship with Mrs. Clarke. She, with her sister, had kept a

school, and the two were earning a respectable livelihood. There was

not the slightest ground for tainting her character; but, having to

admit, upon a very unnecessary and malicious cross-examination, that

she was not born in wedlock, the fathers and mothers of that moral,

that highly-toned age, could not brook the notion of their children

being educated by a ----, whatever name offended society chose to give

her. Her appearance in the inquiry was the prelude to immediate ruin,

for her pupils suddenly vanished; and, as the affair got into the

papers, it was felt by some of the new “patriots” that, to some extent,

she was a martyr to the cause. So they got up a subscription:[8] Mr.

Cobbett leading the way; and she was eventually provided for. They

should get husbands, he says in one of his letters, “in spite of the

_Morning Post_.” But with his characteristic pertinacity, he will have

the money invested in no treacherous “Scrip.” Lord Folkestone suggests

India Bonds as a mode of investment; but Cobbett’s answer is that not

one farthing of money, the disposal of which lies with him, shall ever

be laid out, for one hour, in any India or Government security.

“I am fixed as a rock never to have any hand in doing

anything that shall tend to keep the Funds and the Nabobs in

countenance. It would be a pretty thing indeed for me to

appeal to the compassion of the public, in order to raise the

means of supporting these infernal impostures. No, I will do no

such thing, and besides, I do not believe that the money would

be secure.”

* * * * *

“… From the article which appeared in the _Courier_ of

Saturday, it is beyond a doubt that one of two things must have

taken place; either a copy of the Register, or of proofs, must

have been gotten out of Mr. Hansard’s office; or my ‘copy’ must

have been read and copied at the post-office, previously to its

going to you. This latter would not at all surprise me; and,

indeed, I believe it to have been so. But I wish you to speak

of it to Hansard, and ask him for answer, positively, whether,

to his knowledge or belief, my copy did prematurely get out of

the printing-office. Because, this is a thing to state. It is

another striking instance of the desperateness of our opponents.

“The news from the continent[9] is not quite so good as

we thought it. That rogue, Boney, will certainly put an

extinguisher upon another venerable order of things, and we

shall (Lord have mercy upon us!) have another gang of kings

and princes to keep. It is odd enough that we never get a

queen here. We may have the Queen of Naples anon, perhaps.

‘The Archduke Charles and George Rose’ is, I hear, a toast

at Southampton, which really does make me hesitate before I

decidedly pray for the archduke’s further ‘success,’ and before

I draw out my handkerchief again to weep for the capture of

Vienna. If George Rose wishes success to the Austrians, it

is, I think, a pretty good proof that their success does not

tend to _our_ good. The sheep must necessarily have wishes

in opposition to those of the wolf. I must confess that this

toasting of old Rose along with the archduke has tended to

make me somewhat more reconciled to the fate of the continent.

What is good for the wolf must be bad for the sheep; and _vice

versa_, as the learned say, what is good for George Rose must

be bad for us. No matter what it is: if it be good for George

Rose, it must be bad for us. Whatever makes the public-robbers

weep ought to make us laugh; and it does make me laugh. Every

blow that aims at their execrable power is a blow to be

applauded by us, and by the king too, who is as badly treated

as we are.

“I have a fine jackass, some pointers, and some beautiful

merino sheep, sent me from Spain; and they are safely arrived.

As I am very desirous of stinging the robbers, I wish it to be

said in some of the newspapers that Mr. Cobbett has received a

present ‘from Seville, of a jackass of the real royal blood,

two brace of Andalusian pointers, and some merino sheep; the

whole of which are said to be the most perfect of their kind of

any that have ever been seen in this country.’ I should like

very much to have this inserted in a paper or two, merely to

enrage the rascals.

“The ass and the pointers I must send to London, for they were

carried round by mistake. The sheep I have here, and most

beautiful little things they are. I intend to breed from them.”

The “rascals” were now at work over the Court-Martial. As related in

an early chapter of this history (vol. i. p. 63), a garbled account of

the affair was being circulated broadcast over the country. Thousands

of copies were sent into Hampshire; and bales of them were brought

down by people from London, in their carriages, and tossed out to the

passers-by.

For once in a while, then, Mr. Cobbett thinks it proper to notice the

current calumny. Although it is obvious that the object of the attack

is to discredit him, and thus endeavour to destroy the effect of his

weekly writings, the story can be told in a different way when it is

discovered that part of it has been suppressed; whilst the motive can,

at the same time, be exposed and expounded. Here are Mr. Perceval and

Lord Castlereagh conniving at the sale of seats in Parliament,[10]

and being exposed to the world: is it any wonder that they should

retaliate? Is it any wonder that they also find a story to tell?

But the _Weekly Political Register_ having devoted twenty columns to a

version of the story, which has truth and manliness in every sentence,

and which throws still more light upon the meanness of its opponents:

the thing drops out of sight and hearing! If anybody does bring it up

again, it is only the exulting accused himself, who has found one more

opportunity, at their own hands, of disconcerting his antagonists.

He is urged to pursue the matter; but he protests his unwillingness to

take up his time, and that of his readers, with personal matters. He

has only done it now because it gives him an opportunity of showing

up the “incomparable baseness” of Corruption; and the futility of her

resistance to the impending Reform: the blind and passionate course

which she is taking, in order to stifle inquiry.

One letter from Botley, referring to this matter, is worth quoting:--

“… As to the twenty-two letters, I have full copies of all

the principal ones, and memorandum copies of all the others.

But, is it not evident, internally evident, that letters were

suppressed? Does the thing begin with my charge? No, I cannot

take your advice in keeping the thing up. Those who like the

fun of seeing me on my defence, have either very little regard

for my reputation, or very little taste. It is useless to write

any more about it. What! do you really think I would condescend

to answer any one, who should call upon me to _produce_

letters, from which I make extracts, and which I say I have

before me? Why, don’t you see that even already the _Post_

calls my extract from my letter to Pitt a ‘fabrication’? What

nonsense is it, then, to talk of producing the letters! Would

not they be called fabrications too? Oh, no! there may be just

a sentence or two; but there must be no more _defences_, take

my word for that.… I will, at any time, show Finnerty, Power,

or any friend, the original letters from the Secretary-at-War

to me, and mine to him; and also my letter to Pitt, and all

the charges. But I cannot condescend to do this to the public;

indeed, it is impossible. They must believe me, or let it

alone.”

Again:--

“As to the public-robbers, one _must lose_ by a continuation of

the warfare with them. It is impossible to answer fellows who,

in their very signature, call ‘_Scoundrel_.’ Seriously to sit

down to answer such fellows would be to degrade oneself in an

obvious manner. That will never do. Besides, the thieves are

beaten.…”

Lose: indeed! the day had come, at last. On the very morrow of these

swaggering lines being penned, the _Political Register_ had committed

itself.

As, when the heated pursuer, sure of his game as far as will, and

equipment, are concerned, is brought to the ground by some mean and

unconsidered obstacle: so this eager one, at the very heels of his

adversaries, finds himself suddenly prostrate. And the now-exulting foe

stands over him; while cries of _Habet! Habet!_ sound upon his ears.

FOOTNOTES

[1] This enterprise attracted the notice of the Surveyor to the Board

of Agriculture:--“Mr. Cobbett has been most particularly fortunate in

raising, chiefly from seed, a vast nursery of almost all the different

sorts of forest trees known on the Atlantic side of the middle states

of North America. The vast variety of strong and flourishing plants

which his seed-bed of oaks exhibited in the course of the last summer

bids fair to render his success on this occasion of much importance

to our country,” &c., &c. _Vide_ Vancouver’s “Agricultural Survey of

Hampshire,” 1808.

[2] _I.e._ Henry Hunt, who had recently entered into public life, with

an address to the electors of Wilts. This note (dated 10th April) got

Mr. Cobbett into trouble many years after, when he had long forgotten

this his first impression of Hunt, and dreamed not of the possibility

of such old confidences ever seeing the light of day.

[3] Mr. Howell was a barrister, and a very fair lawyer, but had no

taste for practice at the bar. He pursued this task with the State

Trials until his death in 1817, after which date it was carried on to

completion by his son. It eventually reached thirty-four volumes in

royal 8vo. The enterprise passed into the hands of Hansard, about the

year 1810.

[4] Peter Finnerty, whose name occurs several times in these pages, was

an Irishman, and had been brought up as a printer. In consequence of

a press prosecution in Dublin, he came and settled in London, when he

became Parliamentary reporter on the _Morning Chronicle_, and a popular

character in the journalistic world. He died in 1816, aged fifty-six,

some time after the close of a term of imprisonment for “libel” in

Lincoln jail.

[5] The Hon. William Herbert, one of the candidates. He afterwards

“took the pledge,” as far as regarded pensions and sinecures, but would

not bind himself to decline the offer of _a place_.

[6] Author of another attack on the Duke.

[7] Cartwright.

[8] The inevitable pamphlet appeared--a very funny one in this case.

For the information of the curious, the title is, “Caution against

Future Subscriptions for Prostitutes and their Associates, with Free

Animadversions on several Political Gentlemen who have been Prominently

Active in Promoting Subscriptions for Miss Taylor; with Particulars of

the Duke of York and Mrs. Clarke” (London, 1809).

[9] The Austrians had just suffered two serious defeats.

[10] Mr. Madocks had brought forward distinct charges of corruption

against these two ministers, but the House negatived his motion for

inquiry. This case of “stifling” was one of the most bare-faced of even

that dark age, the debate going off on the dangers of Parliamentary

reform, and the “blessings we derive from the present order of things.”

One thing is certain, that not a soul in that House doubted Madocks’s

case. The “factious” minority numbered eighty-five, of whom Sir Samuel

Romilly was one. He thought it impolitic of the ministry, on their own

account, to try and screen themselves, and justly concluded that the

debate and decision would powerfully act upon the cause of Reform.

(_Vide_ his “Life,” ii. 116.)

William Cobbett: A Biography in Two Volumes, Vol. 2 · 第 4 / 14 章