CHAPTER IX

Saturn

To show the advantages of large telescopes over small ones, Mr. C. Roberts

says that "with the 25-inch refractor of the Cambridge Observatory the

view of the planet Saturn is indescribably glorious; everything I had ever

seen before was visible at a glance, and an enormous amount of detail that

I had never even glimpsed before, after a few minutes' observation."[156]

Chacornac found that the illumination of Saturn's disc is the reverse of

that of Jupiter, the edges of Saturn being brighter than the centre of the

disc, while in the case of Jupiter--as in that of the sun--the edges are

fainter than the centre.[157] According to Mr. Denning, Saturn bears

satisfactorily "greater magnifying power than either Mars or

Jupiter."[158]

At an occultation of Saturn by the moon, which occurred on June 13, 1900,

M. M. Honorat noticed the great contrast between the slightly yellowish

colour of the moon and the greenish tint of the planet.[159]

In the year 1892, when the rings of Saturn had nearly disappeared, Prof.

L. W. Underwood, of the Underwood Observatory, Appleton, Wisconsin

(U.S.A.), saw one of Saturn's satellites (Titan) apparently moving along

the needlelike appendage to the planet presented by the rings. "The

apparent diameter of the satellite so far exceeded the apparent thickness

of the ring that it gave the appearance of a beautiful golden bead moving

very slowly along a fine golden thread."[160]

In 1907, when the rings of Saturn became invisible in ordinary telescopes,

Professor Campbell, observing with the great Lick telescope, noticed

"prominent bright knots, visible ... in Saturn's rings. The knots were

symmetrically placed, two being to the east and two to the west." This was

confirmed by Mr. Lowell, who says, "Condensations in Saturn's rings

confirmed here and measured repeatedly. Symmetric and permanent." This

phenomenon was previously seen by Bond in the years 1847-56. Measures of

these light spots made by Prof. Barnard with the 40-inch Yerkes telescope

show that the outer one corresponded in position with the outer edge of

the middle ring close to the Cassini division, and the inner condensation,

curious to say, seemed to coincide in position with the "crape ring."

Prof. Barnard thinks that the thickness of the rings "must be greatly

under 100 miles, and probably less than 50 miles," and he says--

"The important fact clearly brought out at this apparition of _Saturn_

is that the bright rings are not opaque to the light of the sun--and

this is really what we should expect from the nature of their

constitution as shown by the theory of Clerk Maxwell, and the

spectroscopic results of Keeler."[161]

Under certain conditions it would be theoretically possible, according to

Mr. Whitmell, to see the globe of Saturn through the Cassini division in

the ring. But the observation would be one of great difficulty and

delicacy. The effect would be that, of the arc of the division which

crosses the planet's disc, "a small portion will appear bright instead of

dark, and may almost disappear."[162]

A remarkable white spot was seen on Saturn on June 23, 1903, by Prof.

Barnard, and afterwards by Mr. Denning.[163] Another white spot was seen

by Denning on July 9 of the same year.[164] From numerous observations of

these spots, Denning found a rotation period for the planet of about

10{h} 39{m} 21{s}.[165] From observations of the same spots Signor Comas

Sola found a period 10{h} 38{m}·4, a close agreement with Denning's

result. For Saturn's equator, Prof. Hill found a rotation period of 10{h}

14{m} 23{s}·8, so that--as in the case of Jupiter--the rotation is faster

at the equator than in the northern latitudes of the planet. A similar

phenomenon is observed in the sun. Mr. Denning's results were fully

confirmed by Herr Leo Brenner, and other German astronomers.[166]

Photographs taken by Prof. V. M. Slipher in America show that the spectrum

of Saturn is similar to that of Jupiter. None of the bands observed in the

planet's spectrum are visible in the spectrum of the rings. This shows

that if the rings possess an atmosphere at all, it must be much rarer than

that surrounding the ball of the planet. Prof. Slipher says that "none of

the absorption bands in the spectrum of _Saturn_ can be identified with

those bands due to absorption in the earth's atmosphere," and there is no

trace of aqueous vapour.[167]

In September, 1907, M. G. Fournier suspected the existence of a "faint

transparent and luminous ring" outside the principal rings of Saturn. He

thinks that it may possibly be subject to periodical fluctuations of

brightness, sometimes being visible and sometimes not.[168] This dusky

ring was again suspected at the Geneva Observatory in October, 1908.[169]

M. Schaer found it a difficult object with a 16-inch Cassegrain reflector.

Prof. Stromgen at Copenhagen, and Prof. Hartwig at Bamberg, however,

failed to see any trace of the supposed ring.[170] It was seen at

Greenwich in October, 1908.

A "dark transit" of Saturn's satellite Titan across the disc of the planet

has been observed on several occasions. It was seen by Mr. Isaac W. Ward,

of Belfast, on March 27, 1892, with a 4·3-inch Wray refractor. The

satellite appeared smaller than its shadow. The phenomenon was also seen

on March 12 of the same year by the Rev. A. Freeman, Mr. Mee, and M. F.

Terby; and again on November 6, 1907, by Mr. Paul Chauleur and Mr. A. B.

Cobham.[171]

The recently discovered tenth satellite of Saturn, Themis, was discovered

by photography, and has never been seen by the eye even with the largest

telescopes! But its existence is beyond all doubt, and its orbit round the

planet has been calculated.

Prof. Hussey of the Lick Observatory finds that Saturn's satellite Mimas

is probably larger than Hyperion. He also finds from careful measurements

that the diameter of Titan is certainly overestimated, and that its

probable diameter is about 2500 miles.[172]

The French astronomer, M. Lucien Rudaux, finds the following variation in

the light of the satellites of Saturn:--

Japetus from 9th magnitude to 12th

Rhea " 9 " 10·6

Dione " 9·5 " 10·5

Tethys " 9·8 " 10·5

Titan " 8 " 8·6

The variation of light is, he thinks, due to the fact that the period of

rotation of each satellite is equal to that of their revolution round the

planet; as in the case of our moon.[173]

The names of the satellites of Saturn are derived from the ancient heathen

mythology. They are given in order of distance from the planet, the

nearest being Mimas and the farthest Themis.

1. Mimas was a Trojan born at the same time as Paris.

2. Enceladus was son of Tartarus and Ge.

3. Tethys was wife of Oceanus, god of ocean currents. She became mother of

all the chief rivers in the universe, as also the Oceanides or sea nymphs.

4. Dione was one of the wives of Zeus.

5. Rhea was a daughter of Uranus. She married Saturn, and became the

mother of Vesta, Ceres, Juno, and Pluto.

6. Titan was the eldest son of Uranus.

7. Hyperion was the god of day, and the father of sun and moon.

8. Japetus was the fifth son of Uranus, and father of Atlas and

Prometheus.[174]

9. Phoebe was daughter of Uranus and Ge.

10. Themis was daughter of Uranus and Ge, and, therefore, sister of

Phoebe.

In a review of Prof. Comstock's _Text Book of Astronomy_ in _The

Observatory_, November, 1901, the remark occurs, "We are astonished to see

that Mr. Comstock alludes with apparent seriousness to the _nine_

satellites of Saturn. As regards the ninth satellite, we thought that all

astronomers held with Mrs. Betsy Prig on the subject of this astronomical

Mrs. Harris." This reads curiously now (1909) when the existence of the

ninth satellite (Phoebe) has been fully confirmed, and a tenth satellite

discovered.

Astronomical Curiosities: Facts and Fallacies · 第 9 / 21 章