MORAL INFLUENCE OF SPIRITUALISM.

714. Among the best precepts afforded by the gospel is that of laying

up treasure in heaven, in preference to seeking to become rich in

this world. To pursue the last-mentioned course has been alleged to

disqualify us more or less for entering heaven. Certainly, however,

honest exertion for the acquisition of wealth is the corner-stone of

human prosperity, and money seems in most instances necessary to the

effectual exercise of that fellow-feeling in the cultivation of which

human virtue pre-eminently consists. (See Influence of Mundane wealth

on Celestial Happiness.)

715. How can a man display charity, hospitality, or contribute his

_means_ and _time_ to objects of philanthropy, unless he beforehand lay

up wealth? How could the Samaritan have assisted the traveller who had

been maltreated by thieves, had he not taken care to have something

beforehand, not only for himself, but for the needy? But still the

precept, Lay up treasure for thyself in heaven, is precisely the course

which Spiritualism indicates. Precepts may lead, but examples will

draw. Those who have gone before us to eternal life, furnish us not

only precepts, but examples also. They furnish exemplifications of

the consequences of their conduct, if followed. With few exceptions,

my intercourse has been with those only, who did lay up treasure in

heaven, by doing on earth as they would have others to do unto them.

Of the spirits with whom I have communicated, only two alleged or

indicated that they were unhappy. Of these, I was informed, one bore an

ill character upon earth.

716. Another, after having suggested to his inquiring brother

some measures relating to his surviving wife’s temporal concerns,

spontaneously added the following words: “I am not _hapey_.” The

inquiry being made for the cause of his misery, the resulting reply

was, “I did not do _rite_ when I was in this world.”

717. Another admitted that he was drowned, in consequence of getting

dead drunk. On being asked if he were happy, he answered, “Damned

happy.” In reply to an inquiry whether he was sorry to have quitted

this life, he replied in the affirmative.

718. Having evidently been a seaman, who had sailed under an officer

who was present, he had preserved the usual fondness of sailors for

tobacco and grog. This propensity he could not avoid displaying,

notwithstanding his having passed death’s dread portal, and the obvious

inutility of expressing to mortals his craving for those pernicious

stimulants.

719. Thus it appears that in the spirit world one means of retribution

for the indulgence of bad propensities in this life, is subjugation to

their ungratified cravings.

720. Of course, the more of these a spirit carries with him, the

greater is his misery; while the more he founds his happiness on

the indulgence of good propensities, the greater his power and

opportunities of enjoyment.

721. As an illustration of the manner in which happiness may arise from

the indulgence of good propensities, one of the enjoyments of a spirit

of the fifth sphere is, as I am informed, in looking after children of

relatives and friends, who have not as yet followed them to the spirit

world.

722. Believing in the existence of a spirit world, where there are

thirty-six grades of existence, corresponding to degrees of purity

and intellectual acquirement,—purity alone giving exaltation merely,

while cultivation of mind secures breadth of consideration,—we have,

in the first place, to adhere strictly to truth, honesty, justice,

benevolence, and doing as we would be done by, to reach a sphere higher

in proportion as we are more successful. Yet, among those on the same

plane, superiority in mental attributes gives precedence.

723. Nothing is better known than “while precepts may lead, examples

draw,” and that subjection to bad examples, even when checked by good

precepts, is generally irresistible by the young. But when there are

no precepts to check, but, on the contrary, ill counsel as well as

bad example, few human beings, however well constituted organically,

could resist the tendency of such educational evil. Let bad hereditary

propensities be superadded, and what can ensue but a climax of

wickedness? Manifestly, however, all this is independent of any choice

on the part of the victim. A high degree of virtue may consistently

be inferred to result if all these conditions be inverted, and good

precepts, good examples, co-operative in improving a mind of the

opposite kind, one which owes to its progenitors goodness of heart and

high intellectual capacity.

724. Much stress is laid upon free-will, but is will ever free from

the joint control of reason and passion? What is will, if it be not

the resultant of the conflict or co-operation of these? It may be

a question whether, without passions, a man would act at all; but

certainly he would act like an idiot or baby, so far as his will should

be entirely independent of his reason.

725. It must be conceded, then, that the prodigious diversity between

virtue and vice is the consequence of contingencies, which are no more

under the control of the individual affected than the colour of his

hair or the number of cubits in his stature.

726. The great features of the spiritual religion are, as I understand

them, as follows:—Its foundation is laid in the belief of an all-good

Deity, whose power is manifested to us by the immensity, profundity,

sublimity, ingenuity, and adaptation of the means to the ends in the

creation ascribed to the co-operation, if not origination, of his mind.

The Bible of the spiritualist is the book of nature—the only one which

by inward and outward evidence can be ascribed to divine authorship.

727. In this book we read, as matters of fact, that there is an

infinite series of gradation in the rank of animals, as well as variety

in their dispositions and propensities. This may be seen, from the

half-animal, half-vegetable known as the polypus, up to man, there

being gradations not only of genera, but of species and varieties.

Thus amid men there are various races, rising one above the other

in development, from the Bushman, Hottentot, or lowest Negro, up to

the most highly-developed race of white men. But when we have passed

through the gradation of the races, we have to enter upon that of

individuals, who in the same race are by diversity of organization or

education, or of both, made extremely different as to intellectual,

moral, and scientific pre-eminence.

728. It is difficult for human reason to reconcile with impartiality

this immense diversity in the lot of the creatures of God; but that

such is the law of nature is self-evident: it is an intuitive truth. To

reconcile it with the all-goodness of God, we must suppose a limitation

of power, and that it has been beyond his power to put created beings

more nearly upon a level. But, as Seneca observes, all have received

more than they had a claim for. Some may think that the parable of the

hiring of labourers for a vineyard, conveys an idea like that of the

Roman sage.

729. These considerations being premised, it would seem that punishment

in the spirit world is only the carrying out of the same system,

excepting that while the deficiencies or vices which have arisen in

this world become a punishment in the next, they also operate as

the means of improvement, or, to use the language of that world, of

“_progression_.” It may be inferred that as in this world the power

of the Deity, although commensurate with the all but infinite universe

in which we exist, was so restricted by conditions as to induce that

enormous diversity of position in the scale of animation which has

been presented to view. Yet in the world to come these defects and

vices are liable to be remedied; and, though they react upon their

victim, it is with a view to his own ultimate benefit. There is not

a malevolent devil to seize the poor miscreant, and, like the savage

Indian, torture him with a fiend-like pleasure. He is regarded with

compassion, and as soon as contrition is induced, treated with sympathy

by the higher spirits, and assisted by counsel and enlightened by

instruction. Unable any longer to indulge his bad propensities, the

desire of rising to a higher level becomes a passion. Intellectual and

social pleasures begin to be enjoyed. So long as he remains under the

influence of his mundane appetites, he has to consort with spirits

who are similarly actuated; they read each other’s mind, and thus are

made acquainted with the deformity of their own. They eventually thus

become instrumental in reciprocal correction. So soon as an aspiration

for a better state is awakened, they rise to the next plane or circle

above that in which they may have been existing; the only difficulty

is in taking the first step. Progression grows with its growth, and

strengthens with its strength, so that all beings may sooner or

later attain to the highest sphere in the spirit world. It should be

understood that there is no pardon for existing sin. Pardon can only

exist as a consequence of reform, and in proportion thereto. (92.)

730. An assailant of Spiritualism, who not long since lectured at

Sansom Street Hall, founded one of his charges on the commiseration

felt by good angels for sinners, agreeably to Spiritualism. But from

the examination above given respecting the origin of the difference

between the virtuous and vicious, does it not appear that the fate of

the latter is quite as hard as can be reconciled with justice, even

under the more benign institution of Spiritualism? According to this,

there exist in the spirit world six spheres, each subdivided into six

circles or planes, forming together a succession of grades in which the

soul finds its place according to moral and intellectual merit. The

first of the spheres is throughout comparatively hideous in its aspect

and disgusting in its inhabitants, who are designated by a dark halo

in lieu of the effulgence which distinguishes spirits of the rest of

the spheres. Moreover, this distinguishing effulgence, as well as the

beauty of the spirit world, augments with the grade of the being whom

it envelops, thus making a series of ranks in society founded on real

nobility of head and heart. When it is considered that this immense

diversity ensues mainly from contingency in organization, education,

and greater or less exposure to trial, it must be clear that the

difference made between the good and the bad by Spiritualism does not

fall short of the degree which human reason can reconcile with justice.

731. The assailant of Spiritualism to whom allusion was made,

while admitting the truth of the evidence given of communication

with spirits, explained it by reference to Satan. It is remarkably

inconsistent with this idea that this evidence is of a nature to

abrogate the existence, and of course the sovereignty, of that

imaginary arch-fiend. Again, it can hardly be conceived that the

greater commiseration for sinners should come from a malevolent devil,

and the urging for everlasting and cruel torture from a sincere

disciple of the benevolent Jesus Christ. But how much, then, must it

shock one who embraces these views, that in addition to the misfortune

of being badly organized, badly educated, and badly tempted, the being

subjected to these disadvantages is to be exposed eternally to misery,

typified, if not realized, by broiling on burning brimstone! I am

aware that doing away with the more horrible attributes of hell will

be alleged to be subversive of one of the restraints upon criminality;

but, in the first place, it is evident that a man who is restrained

from crime solely by the fear of punishment is only a more prudent

villain than one who is not restrained by that selfish apprehension.

When a man is deterred from crime only by prudence, hope of reward, or

fear of punishment, he ought not to have a higher grade in heaven than

the perpetrator of the crime.

732. But, agreeably to experience, of all restraints upon crime, none

are more efficacious than the fear of degradation. The lawyer who will

do the bidding of a caucus (or of a powerful demagogue in the executive

office) in order to get a judicial appointment, when securely seated

therein, will not give a charge which will degrade him in the eyes of

the legal profession, and consequently in that of society, as well as

in his own estimation. The dishonest gambler, who neglects to pay his

tradesman’s bill, will not fail to pay his gambling debts. The debtor

who will take every advantage in getting a high price for his goods,

and who will put off any other payment as long as possible, fails not

to pay his note at a bank. Sovereign states, who pay no other claims,

take every means to meet the interest on their funded obligations.

“Failure” in the one case, in the mercantile adaptation, involves

the loss of reputation for good financial faith, abroad as well as at

home; but the just complaints of domestic claimants, not heard upon

the exchange, are unheeded. The great object, in many cases, is not

to leave the crime “undone, but to keep it unknown.” The corrupt,

selfish politician, who would promote war in order to give himself an

opportunity of emolument or official pre-eminence, when facing the

enemy in the field of battle will _nominally_ die for that country

whose interests he has sacrificed. But not from the alleged motive will

he die, but either to avoid being degraded as a coward, or for the hope

of popularity which may help him to office.

733. In the spirit world, all are seen through and justly estimated,

so that degradation and vice, or elevation and virtue, are inevitably

associated by spiritual intuition. Yet there is, in my opinion, far

more satisfactory proof of the truth of Spiritualism than of any other

creed involving immortality; while, so far as adopted, it must tend

to do away with priestcraft, sectarian malevolence, and religious

intolerance. Man will go to the spirits of his ancestors for his

religion, not to a fanatical, bigoted, or interested priest. Should

spirits actually exist, as supposed, and convey the same religious

knowledge all over the world, all men will agree that virtue is to be

the means of salvation, not bigotry, under the name of faith.

734. It is conceived that Spiritualism has all the desirable attributes

of religion, as stated in the second page of the introduction of this

work. It sanctions the idea of the existence of one Supreme Being,

who is represented as all love to his creatures; while his powers

are made known to us by the sublimity, profundity, magnificence, and

inconceivable extent of the creation which he rules. It does not

represent him as selfishly creating us for the purpose of worshipping

him, as capable of jealousy or implacable wrath for the result of

errors which his alleged omnipotence could by a _fiat_ correct. On

the contrary, we have been created to be happy sooner or later; evil

existing not through design, but in consequence of conditions which

he cannot control or cure unless through the operation of general

principles.

735. With a view to mutual happiness, reciprocal beneficence is

enjoined. We are required to obey the precepts of acting toward others

as we would have them act toward us.

736. This innate law is appealed to instinctively by any child who

is oppressed by another larger than itself, and was consecrated by

Confucius six hundred years before its judicious sanction by Christ.

737. Spiritualism has the merit pre-eminently not only of furnishing

a knowledge of immortality beyond the grave, but a precise knowledge

of the spirit world in lieu of the silence of the Pentateuch and the

vagueness and inconsistency of the gospel. An effort to establish the

truth of these allegations will be made under the next head.

THE HEAVEN AND HELL OF SPIRITUALISM CONTRASTED WITH THE HEAVEN AND HELL

OF SCRIPTURE.

738. On the first spiritual manifestations occurring, the great object

of the mass of observers was to see the physical effects. In the

next place, intellectual communications were sought, but these being

obtained by a tedious process, it was deemed sufficiently interesting

if a few sentences could be made out, or even one. It was, moreover,

a great object with inquirers to ascertain by the interchange of

language, whether the spirit of a relation or friend were really

present, as alleged by the supposed spirit. Hence, the communications

were very deficient as respects any information of the spirit world.

It is not surprising, therefore, that prejudicial unbelievers should

have taken up the idea that there is nothing inviting in the heaven

of Spiritualism. I hope that, agreeably to the communications from the

spirit world recorded in the preceding pages, there is enough to create

an ardent desire to become a dweller therein.

739. But is it not unreasonable for a person to disdain a state of

existence which is by the spirits themselves described as “ineffably”

happy? Alluding to the progression, which is to carry spirits

eventually among the ministering angels of God, I observed to my spirit

friend, Dr. W. E. Channing, that I did not consider him in heaven yet.

“Were you situated as I am,” said he, “you would not say that!” But

let us see how far the ideas of heaven, as warranted in Scripture, are

comparable with those which have been communicated by spirits.

740. In a work by the Rev. Mr. Harbaugh, of the German Reformed

Church of Lancaster, Pa., a great effort is made to collect all the

hints respecting heaven which have been given in the Old and New

Testaments. This learned divine quotes the following paragraph from

Dr. Chalmers: “The common imagination,” says Dr. Chalmers, “that we

have a paradise on the other side of death, is that of a lofty aerial

region, where the inmates float in ether, or are mysteriously suspended

upon nothing—where all the warm and sensible accompaniments which give

such an expression of strength, and life, and colouring to our present

habitation, are attenuated into a sort of spiritual element; that is,

meagre and imperceptible, and utterly uninviting to the eye of mortals

here below; where every vestige of materialism is done away, and

nothing left but unearthly scenes, that have no power of allurement,

and certain unearthly ecstasies, with which it is felt impossible to

sympathize.”

741. After reading and believing the representations of heaven given by

the immortal inhabitants of the spirit world, who can avoid turning in

disgust from the portrait thus cited by Dr. Chalmers?

742. The most favourable idea of heaven given in Scripture seems to

be that which identifies it with Paradise; in other words, a most

beautiful garden. But who would conceive an _eternal_ residence in one

garden, however superlative its attractions, as desirable? The idea

of the spheres assumes a succession of gardens, with every pleasure,

every joy of which the human heart and intellect are capable; and

beyond those gardens the whole universe is open to us, and an ultimate

ministration as angels under our Heavenly Father.

743. The portraiture cited by Chalmers is not approved of by the

Rev. Mr. Harbaugh, but in order to confute it he does not resort to

any better picture given in the Bible, but to reasoning. This shows

that, learned as he is, and idolatrous as he appears in worshipping

the Bible as an adequate fountain of light, he cannot get from the

object of this idolatry any passage tending to prove the inconsistency

of the idea quoted from Chalmers with Scripture. Were there not the

greatest poverty of instruction on this all-important subject, the

ideas alleged to exist as above mentioned, upon the high authority

of Dr. Chalmers, could never have had sufficient currency to merit

notice. It may be assumed that no Christians can conceive themselves

to be better entitled to the joys of heaven than the twelve apostles

of Christ. In order to show how far any expectations of a bliss higher

than that afforded by Spiritualism could have been entertained by those

disciples consistently with Scripture, I deem it in point to refer the

language held to them by their Divine Master. I subjoin a few lines

from Dr. Harbaugh, wherein he quotes the query put to that Master, by

the _twelve_, and the consequent reply. Nothing can be farther from my

idea of a happy state than the benefaction promised to them. The query

and reply are subjoined, in order to enable the reader to judge of

both:—_Behold, we have left all and followed thee: what shall we have

therefor?_ The Saviour answered the above query when made by Peter, as

follows:—_When the Son of Man shall sit upon the throne of his glory,

ye shall also sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of

Israel._ Here is a direct answer by Christ to an inquiry respecting

the nature of the reward which his disciples were to have for their

merits as his faithful devotees. They are to be made severally worldly

dignitaries; each is to sit on a throne, judging a tribe of Israel.

That is, they are to have worldly pre-eminence, accompanied, of course,

by all the vexations attendant on such stations, as well as the

uncertainty and limitation arising from liability to death and disease.

How weak and worldly-minded must his disciples have been, could such

a prospect be alluring to them! I ask for any sectarian to say in

candour, whether a governorship over one of the wealthiest States, the

presidency, or any sovereignty in Christendom, would be deemed a heaven

in comparison with that eternity of ineffable happiness enjoyed by the

immortal spirits of the higher spheres? Yet Mr. Harbaugh, with the

simplicity of blind faith, quotes this without perceiving how meagre is

the gospel evidence thus afforded of the joys awaiting the faithful as

a reward for their good conduct in this life.

744. The following remarks, made by Mr. Harbaugh, demonstrate how

partial sectarians are in reading Scripture: “_What shall we have

therefor? This is a question that frequently arises in the Christian’s

mind, as he endeavours to cheer his ofttimes drooping spirits with

a look toward the recompense of reward. What shall we have? We have

left all for thee, and by following thee we have confessed that we

are pilgrims and strangers upon earth. In this world we shall have

tribulation; but thou didst overcome the world; what shall those have

who overcame with thee?_” Harbaugh remarks: “_Here then is curiosity

which the Saviour himself approves, because he satisfies it. The same

pious curiosity still manifests itself in the minds of God’s people in

their holiest hours, and shall there be nothing revealed to satisfy

them? Yes, God will approve of such inquiries, and will grant the

influence of that Spirit, who leads unto all truth to all those who

search the Scripture for an answer._” Drawing an eloquent picture of

the aspirations of the soul for some realization of the vague ideas of

the rewards of the faithful in a future state of existence, he exults

that this _curiosity_, as he calls it, should be sanctioned by Christ,

“who approves this curiosity because he satisfies it.” How does he

satisfy it? Is it by holding up the hope of a judgeship for each? It

seems it was not then foreseen that instead of performing the part of

the Jewish Messiah, with which he thus identified himself, that of

gathering together the _chosen_ people of God, he was to put forth

opinions which were to scatter them through the world. “Wo unto you,

Chorazin,” &c., for the heinous offence of not admitting him to be

both the Messiah and the Son of God. The promise of the judgeships was

quite consistent with the former character, and strengthens the idea

that he never pretended to any higher mission. With this the promise

in question is consistent, but is wholly irreconcilable with his

divinity, which would make these judgeships worse than giving a stone

for bread or a serpent for a fish. In order to have bestowed these

judgeships, the Roman empire must have been subverted. It seems that if

(as stated by the worthy Mr. Harbaugh) _the curiosity of the disciples

was truly and correctly satisfied_, that this satisfaction was the sum

total of the heaven with which they were remunerated; since not the

slightest hint is given that they were, like the penitent thief, to

be with their object of devotion in paradise. It would seem, on the

whole, that the rewards of the thief and the beggar Lazarus were of a

more heavenly nature than those promised to the apostles, even had the

latter been susceptible of realization, instead of being irreconcilable

with the doom which awaited the Hebrews, and consequently a mere _vox

et præterea nihil_. But while, in lieu of an eternal progressive

happiness, Christ holds up the transient, precarious, and limited

supremacy from which a truly pious and wise man would turn in disgust,

when hell is to be represented, we have eternal torments typified

by fire, and weeping and gnashing of teeth in _utter darkness_, in

despite of this fire. The situation which Christ, the Son of God, was

to have, was to bear manifestly a relation to that of his disciples.

His situation would be somewhat analogous to that of Washington, when

he was in the presidential chair, and the thirteen States were governed

by as many of his faithful followers in the Revolutionary War. Yet

Washington did not find his chair worth retaining longer than the good

of the country made it important to remain. I am confident that neither

would that great man leave his position in the seventh sphere for the

presidency, nor any spirit among those who held the gubernatorial

dignity, as suggested, find a governorship now a motive for leaving

their bright abodes in the celestial world.

745. Dr. Harbaugh sanctions the idea that the revolutions of all

the constellations with which telescopic examination has made us

acquainted, may take place about a central sun, bearing the relation

to other suns analogous to that which God has been represented to

have to the other potentates; whence the title of “King of kings.”

The existence, then, of a _sun_ of _suns_ is suggested, about which

the constellations formed by inferior bodies of the same kind revolve.

It would seem, then, that a more fitted allotment had been made if,

enthroned by his Father’s side on that sun of suns, he had allotted

to each of his disciples a constellation, than have assigned to them

miserable transitory judgeships in Judea: a speck of territory, in this

speck of a globe, which in a field of vision embracing the universe,

would be imperceptible.

746. There being in Scripture so much more stress laid upon the

torments of hell than the joys of heaven, is probably the reason why

the horror of death is so great among Christians in general. Their

practice in this respect is to speak of death as a great calamity.

Here and there may be found a believer who is thoroughly convinced

that the efficacy of his peculiar tenets, combined with the absence of

criminality, and the redeeming influence of repentance, will insure

him a passage to heaven; but the predominant language is to represent

the death of any large number of human beings as a great calamity.

Those who are exposed to danger pray most earnestly to be saved, and

their death is always treated as a cause for deep regret by surviving

friends. Hence the weeping, the grief, and the mourning called for by

custom,—the relations and connections wearing black for months. Hence

the dark hearse, the black pall, and bitter lamentation over the grave;

which shows that it is not realized that death is only a glorious

spiritual birth! I am confident that spiritualists will soon abandon

a custom which must on their part be inconsistent; since they must

look on death as no more a bereavement, than a residence in a foreign

country, the means of communication being within reach, and a happy

reunion foreseen.

747. When on board of a steamer under way at night, the possibility of

her going down occurring to my mind, I felt cheered by the idea that

I should not go down with her, but soar to the spirit world with my

immortal friends, who would flock to meet my apotheosis. (Page 101.)

748. It has been urged that a most substantial idea of heaven, given

in the old Bible, is that of a restoration to Paradise, of which the

description gives the idea of an exquisite, beautiful garden; but

Spiritualism gives the idea of garden above garden, improving in beauty

with their elevation. Then there are thirty-six gradations in all, and

in the five happy spheres thirty; so that there is excitement arising

from well-rewarded emulation as a source of interest. Into the idea of

heaven, as suggested in Scripture, intellectual ability and improvement

form no part and give no superiority; whence the tendency of the more

strict constructionists to turn a cold shoulder to every acquirement

which is not coupled with scriptural knowledge. Neither the Athenæum,

nor any library, is to be accessible on Sunday. If the time devoted

at meetings and at church were given to the study of the real book

of God, how much more learned would be those who thus employ their

Sundays! It is held that the lowest and most ignorant person who is

educated to believe implicitly the tenets of a sect, when he would by

the same process as easily be made to believe any other tenets, is

in heaven to be as high as the most enlightened as well as virtuous

man, who has the only merit which can be attached to belief in a high

degree—that of ardent desire for truth, and taking the pains to form an

opinion for himself. Nay, the ignorant bigot is to be higher in heaven,

if the free-thinker alluded to, should not agree with the ghostly

adviser, of the devoted sectarian with whom he is compared.

749. The idea of living in the finest garden which imagination can

conceive, without the enjoyments and progression which my father’s

communication attributes to the spheres, would beget tedium rather

than the ineffable happiness which my spirit friends profess to enjoy.

But while one of the Jewish ideas of heaven in its best form, is thus

deficient, the description given by the learned Josephus of hell is

horrible in the extreme, that of heaven being disgusting. I give it as

I find it quoted by the Rev. Mr. Harbaugh:

750. “Now as to Hades, wherein the souls of the righteous and

unrighteous are detained, it is necessary to speak of it. Hades is a

place in the world not regularly finished, a subterraneous region,

wherein the light of this world does not shine; from which circumstance

in this region there must be perpetual darkness. This region is

allotted as a place of custody for souls, in which angels are appointed

as guardians to them, who distribute to them temporary punishment,

agreeably to every one’s behaviour and manners.

751. “In this region there is a certain place set apart as a lake of

unquenchable fire, whereinto, we suppose, no one hath hitherto been

cast, but it is prepared for a day aforedetermined by God, in which

one righteous sentence shall deservedly be passed upon all men; when

the unjust, and those that have been disobedient to God, and have

given honour to such idols as have been the vain operations of the

hands of men as to God himself, shall be adjudged to this everlasting

punishment, as having been the causes of defilement; while the just

shall obtain an incorruptible and never-fading kingdom. These are now

indeed confined in Hades, but not in the same place wherein the just

are confined. For there is one descent in this region, at whose gate,

we believe, there stands an archangel, with a host; which gate, when

those pass through that are conducted down by the angels appointed

over souls, they do not go the same way, but the just are guided to

the right hand, and are led with hymns, sung by the angels appointed

over that place, unto a region of light, in which the just have dwelt

from the beginning of the world, not constrained by necessity, but

ever enjoying the prospect of the good things they see, and rejoicing

in the expectation of those new enjoyments which will be peculiar

to every one of them, and esteeming those things beyond what we have

here; with whom there is no place of toil, no burning heat, no piercing

cold, nor any briers there; but the countenances of the fathers and

the just, which they see always, smile upon them while they wait for

the rest, and eternal new life in heaven, which is to succeed this

region. This place we call the bosom of Abraham. But as to the unjust,

they are dragged by force to the left hand, by the angels allotted

for punishment, no longer going with a good will, but as prisoners

driven by violence; to whom are sent the angels appointed over them

to reproach them, and threaten them with their terrible looks, and to

thrust them still downward. Now these angels that are set over these

souls drag them into the neighbourhood of hell itself; who, when they

are hard by it, continually hear the noise of it, and do not stand

clear of the hot vapour itself; but when they have a near view of this

spectacle, as of a terrible and exceeding great prospect of fire, they

are struck with a fearful expectation of a future judgment, and in

effect punished thereby; not only so, but when they see the place (or

choir) of the fathers and of the just, even thereby are they punished,

for a chaos deep and large is fixed between them, insomuch that a just

man that hath compassion upon them cannot be admitted, nor can any one

that is unjust, if he were bold enough to attempt it, pass over it.”

752. So much for Josephus. Mr. Harbaugh subjoins as follows: “This

extract is exceedingly interesting. It shows to what extent of

distinctness the Jewish ideas of the future state had attained. The

dreamlike underworld is here considerably illuminated. The righteous

and the wicked are separated, and already share the first fruits of

their eternal reward. The righteous are surrounded with intimations

and shadowy promises of better things to come, in the expectation of

which they are already happy; the wicked are surrounded with tokens and

forebodings of more fearful ill, much of which they already suffer in

awful expectation.

753. “Through this picture,” says our good parson, “we see in faint

but terrible glimmerings, in the distance, the region of eternal fire,

which awaits the wicked when the judgment-day shall remove them from

Hades; on the other hand, we see also the dawning of an eternal day

for the just, the rest and eternal new life which is to succeed this

region. This kingdom of the dead, beyond which the thoughts of men

in the early ages did not wander, is considered only as a place of

detention for judgment, while the idea of a final state, both for the

righteous and the wicked, is believed to exist beyond it.”

754. How can any person sincerely pretend that those who rely on a

happy idea of our immortal life are indebted for it to the source

from which this Hebrew Pharisee derived the impressions given in the

preceding quotation? Yet the Pharisees were the only conspicuous

Hebrew sect who believed in heaven. The Sadducees did not believe in

immortality.

755. The history of Lazarus and the rich man, (says Harbaugh, page

168,) “plainly teaches that both the righteous and the wicked on death

pass into a fixed and eternal abode, where no change is possible;”

and he further states (pp. 169-70) that “the misery of the wicked

commences immediately after death, and before the resurrection, and

their condition is unchangeably fixed.” According to St. Luke, (chapter

xvi.) in the page alluded to above by Harbaugh, we are informed that

the wicked, while in the torture of hell-fire, are within the view of

the righteous, (verse 23.) The righteous are near enough to converse

with those in torment, and yet there is an impassable barrier between

them. The rich man is not tortured for his sins, but simply because

he had “_enjoyed good things_.” Yet Abraham, who turned his son and

son’s mother out in the wilderness to starve, and twice exposed his

wife to prostitution, is represented as enjoying the reward due to the

righteous.

756. How little sincere, heartfelt belief there can be in the words

of Christ, may be estimated from the fact that scarcely any Christian

but seeks for the good things of this life, instead of qualifying

themselves for heaven by undergoing the rewarded privations of a

Lazarus.

757. It is utterly unintelligible to my mind why repentance and

reformation should not avail after, as well as before death, as it is

represented to be in the spirit world.

758. There is a coincidence between these representations of Josephus

and those of the gospel, so far as that both represent the righteous as

witnessing the torments of the wicked. Would not such a situation make

heaven a hell to good-hearted angels?

759. According to Matthew, (chapter xxv. 24,) the blessed, after

the day of judgment, are to _inherit the kingdom prepared from the

foundation of the world_. Of the joys that kingdom would afford there

is no description. But, as usual, hell is made sufficiently horrible,

(chapter xxv. 41,)—“Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire,

prepared for the devil and his angels.”

760. In this respect, if in no other, there is an immense superiority

in the conceptions of futurity given by my immortal advisers, in

comparison with those attributed as above to Christ.

761. It has been urged that human conduct is so much dependent on

organization, education, temptation, and example, neither of which are

within the option of any soul, that the orthodox doctrine respecting

sin is manifestly wrong. But admitting the culpability which that

doctrine imputes, it has been shown that the gradations of sinfulness

between the extremes of vice and virtue are innumerable. Suppose for

each gradation a strand in a ladder, like that of which Jacob dreamed,

and human souls supported severally at elevations commensurate with

their respective pretensions. This adjustment being made, suppose a

plane at any level to divide the vertical row into two portions, all

below the plane being considered as goats, all above the plane as

sheep. Evidently, between the soul just above, and that just below the

plane, there would be only a shade of difference; yet the one would

have to go to hell, the other to heaven, eternally.

762. According to Spiritualism, on entering the spirit world each soul

finds its just level by a sort of moral specific gravity, in which

merit is inversely as weight. Every soul, moreover, has the privilege

of reforming, and rising proportionally to the improvement thus

obtained.

763. One of the most agreeable conceptions attending our future

existence in the spheres, is that of being restored to the appearance

of youth; the decrepitude and wrinkles of age, of disease, mutilation,

deformity, ugliness, are all avoided in the spiritual body. The insane

are restored to reason, the idiot gradually improved in mind.

DISCORDANCE AS TO THE WHEREABOUT OF THE SCRIPTURAL HEAVEN.—INSTINCTIVE

IMPRESSION AS TO HEAVEN BEING OVERHEAD.

764. There is no small degree of contradiction in Scripture respecting

the locality of heaven. In addressing the thief, paradise is identified

with heaven by Christ. “_St. Paul is alleged to have been taken up

into paradise_,” says Harbaugh; yet, according to the map accompanying

the work of Josephus, Paradise is represented as being upon the river

Tigris, near the Persian Gulf. The idea given of the abode of Adam

and Eve, in Genesis, conveys the impression that it was a terrestrial

locality.

765. In the Decalogue the abbreviation of life is threatened as the

punishment for not honouring parents, and God is alleged to have

held out the promised land to Moses, instead of comforting him by a

clairvoyant view of a place of blissful enjoyment in some celestial

region.

766. Elijah was carried up to heaven in the sight of Elisha. The

commandment makes heaven above, the earth beneath. Christ was seen

ascending by his disciples, and according to the apostles’ creed, after

descending into hell, he arose on the third day and ascended into

heaven. Yet Josephus consigns both heaven and hell to a subterranean

region, like the Elysian Fields and Erebus of the heathen, but places

them on each side of a lake of everlasting fire. This representation is

sanctioned in the allusion by Christ to Dives, Lazarus, and Abraham;

the former, broiling to eternity, requests that Lazarus should get a

little water to cool the tip of his tongue. This Abraham declares to be

_impossible_. Hence it appears the parties were so near as to converse

with each other, and for those who were blest to witness the sufferings

of the damned. Thus, according to Christ as well as Josephus, heaven

and hell are in immediate proximity, and both must be in the infernal

regions.

767. The actual effects of the old Bible were to produce either

_unbelievers_ in _immortality_, like the Sadducees, or _immoral

believers_, like the Pharisees, whom Christ especially denounces as

_vipers_, and _internally corrupt, like whited sepulchres holding dead

men’s bones_.

768. Christ never singles out the Sadducees for denunciation, but

speaks of the Pharisees particularly as hypocritical and corrupt. But

in what did their hypocrisy consist, if it was not in that insincerity

of their professions as respects belief in futurity which was shown by

their worldliness.

769. Thus the evidence of the existence of a future state was such as

to produce avowed unbelievers, or professed believers whose morality

was so deficient as to create an expression that they were corrupt

hypocrites, as odious as vipers.

770. It is not the feebleness of the impressions respecting the

existence of another world, where happiness is proportional to good

conduct, that renders the existing system so inoperative in preventing

those vices which it especially interdicts; as, for instance,

combativeness, cupidity, and revengefulness; so that the course usually

pursued by professed Christians, does not merely amount to a neglect

of Christ’s precepts, but renders an adherence to them disreputable?

Nothing is more degrading throughout Christendom than poverty or tame

submission to blows. The last excuse Christians in general will make

for any omission or deficiency is their poverty.

771. If they really believed that they would broil to eternity, like

the rich man, merely for seeking the good things of this life, would

the attainment of those good things be made the great object of their

existence?

772. Notwithstanding the representations of Josephus, sanctioned, as

above shown, by Christ, of the subterranean localization of Elysium,

there seems, nevertheless, an instinctive propensity to assume that

heaven is overhead. Clergymen all look upward when they address God,

and the Thespian artists universally follow their example. Whenever

heaven is referred to, it is customary, I believe, for all devout

persons to turn their eyes in the same direction.

773. But if heaven be above, what does this term _above_ mean? It

practically designates a vertical direction relatively to this globe

at any point over which a speaker who uses the word may stand.

Consequently, it indicates a space overhead, having everywhere the same

relative position to the terrestrial surface; in other words, a region

concentric with that surface, like that within which the clouds float.

This floating takes place rarely at a less distance than two, or more

than six, miles.

774. The spiritual spheres are estimated, as already mentioned, as

being between sixty and one hundred and twenty miles from the earth’s

surface. They are, therefore, analogous in position to the region

of the clouds, though at a much greater distance and vastly more

capacious.

775. According to Christianity, there is no immortality for animals

below the grade of humanity; but according to Spiritualism, animals

that are favourites of man in this world are his companions in the

next. Much stress is laid on the singing of birds in the account

given of the spheres. There is a line of demarcation below which the

privilege of an existence after death is not enjoyed. Respecting that

boundary my information is at present incomplete.

776. In order to do justice to the excellent and learned clergyman to

whom I have so often referred, I will annex the whole of those pages in

which he conceives himself to give the “_true doctrine_” respecting

heaven. However unsatisfactory it may be to me, I hope it will be found

interesting to those who, like the author, look only to the Bible for

information respecting their existence beyond the grave.

“THE TRUE DOCTRINE”

_Respecting Heaven, according to the Rev. H. Harbaugh, Pastor of the

First German Reformed Church, Lancaster, Penna._

“One gentle sigh their fetter breaks;

We scarce can say, ‘They’re gone!’

Before the willing spirit takes

Her mansion near the throne.”

777. “The different theories by which the souls of saints are supposed

to be detained from entering heaven immediately at death, have now been

exhibited. They have led us a long and dreary chase. The groundlessness

of these theories has been, in part, shown in connection with a

statement of them. They will, however, be more completely overthrown

by a statement of the true doctrine, and by the arguments that may be

adduced in its support. Various arguments that, in passing along, were

offered against these false views, will also substantiate the true

doctrine; thus the same implements that have been used to tear down the

old building may be employed to erect the new. If, therefore, any thing

should be presented in this section, among other things, which may

seem to have been presented before, it must be remembered that though

they are the same tools, they are now used to do a different kind of

execution.

778. “We consider the true doctrine of God’s word on this subject to be

this: The saints do immediately, at death, enter that place which is

called heaven, where the body of the Saviour now is, where the divine

manifestations are most clearly and gloriously made, where angels have

their proper home, and where all the heirs of Christ shall finally and

forevermore be assembled.

779. “That the saints pass immediately at death into heaven, is taught

in the symbols in some of the most pious and learned denominations in

the church. We grant that this does not prove it absolutely true; but

it has much weight, as showing how the Scripture on this subject was

understood by many pious and learned men who had the same interest

in and motives for the truth as we have, and were, we may therefore

suppose, just as sincerely anxious to be led into the truth as we can

possibly be. The conclusions, therefore, to which they have come, and

which have been adopted by their numerous successors for centuries, are

valuable. Beside furnishing us with the testimony of so much learning

and piety, it serves to show that this is no new idea, and that it is

not the faith of a few, but is the testimony of the church.

780. “The first symbolical testimony we produce is the Heidelberg

Catechism, published first in 1563. This symbol has been the embodiment

of the reformed faith for more than three centuries. Its influence

has been very extensively respected and felt. It has, since its

publication, been translated and read in at least fourteen different

languages; and it is said that _half a million editions_ of it have

been published in Germany alone. In this country it is received as a

symbolic book, both in the Dutch Reformed and in the German Reformed

churches. In the fifty-seventh question it is asked, What comfort is

afforded to us by the doctrine of the resurrection of the body; and the

answer is: ‘That not only my soul after this life _shall be immediately

taken up to Christ its head_; but also, that my body, being raised by

the power of Christ, shall be reunited with my soul, and be made like

unto the glorious body of Christ.’ Here the doctrine is plainly taught,

and has been responded to with a joyful amen by millions during three

hundred years.

781. “The next is from the Shorter Catechism, received as a symbolic

book in the different branches of the Presbyterian communion. It is

in answer to the thirty-seventh question: ‘What benefits do believers

receive from Christ at death? The souls of believers are at their death

made perfect in holiness, _and do immediately pass into glory_; and

their bodies, being still united to Christ, do rest in their graves

till the resurrection.’ In the eighty-sixth question of the Larger

Catechism this same doctrine is taught in more words. The following

quotation is from the Westminster Confession of Faith: ‘The bodies

of men, after death, return to dust and see corruption; but their

souls, (which neither die nor sleep,) having an immortal substance,

_immediately_ return to God who gave them. The souls of the righteous,

being _then_ made perfect in holiness, _are received into the highest

heavens_, where they behold the face of God in light and glory, waiting

for the full redemption of their bodies.’ The declaration that they

are ‘_then_ made perfect in holiness,’ is no doubt directly aimed

against the idea of a process of purgatorial or medicinal preparation,

mentioned in a previous section. The declaration that they are then

‘received into the _highest heavens_,’ is intended to stand in

opposition to the idea of a middle abode in all its forms.

782. “The book of ‘Doctrines and Discipline of the Methodist Episcopal

Church’ is silent on this subject; but, so far as I have been able

to learn, the proper Protestant doctrine on this subject is held in

that large communion. Their views of the nature of justification and

sanctification would admit of no other to be consistently believed

among them. It is believed that this is also the prevailing sentiment

among Baptists, and other Congregationalists.

783. “What is here presented from symbols as the united faith of so

many learned and pious men living in different ages, and in different

parts of the world, is also founded on holy Scripture. By no wresting

and violence has the church, in the general stream of its theological

views, been turned aside from this faith. It is vain that men hope to

annul, by means of violent and unnatural interpretations, the plain

declarations of Scripture, to serve a theory.

‘Truth, crush’d to earth, will rise again,

The eternal years of God are hers.’

784. “The Saviour said to the penitent thief on the cross—‘To-day shalt

thou be with me in paradise.’ Now the question arises, Where and what

is that paradise in which the Saviour promised the dying penitent that

he should be with him that day? This can be seen by referring to other

passages in the Scriptures where the word paradise is used, and where

its sense cannot be mistaken. This can be seen by reference to 2 Cor.

xii. There it is said that Paul was caught up into paradise; and in the

same passage the place into which he was taken is called the _third

heaven_—the highest and holiest place in the universe. In Rev. ii. 7

we are told that the tree of life stands in the midst of the paradise

of God; and in Rev. xxii. 2, we are told that that same tree of life

stands by the side of the river which flows from the throne of God and

the Lamb. From this it is evident that paradise is the heaven where God

dwells and the Lamb. Is then the middle abode, Hades, the kingdom of

shades, the peculiar abode of God and the Lamb?

785. “The objection that the Saviour himself did not go to heaven

that day, but was for forty days afterward on the earth, and that

therefore he could not be with the penitent thief in paradise, has no

force. During the three days that intervened between his death and

resurrection, he could as well be in heaven as in Hades. Indeed, it is

evident that he was in heaven during those three days, from what he

says to his disciples shortly before his death: ‘A little while, and

ye shall not see me; and again, a little while, and ye shall see me,

_because I go to the Father_.’ Moreover, his tarrying on the earth and

appearing among his disciples does not conflict with the idea that he

was also in paradise. When he was yet in the flesh on earth, he could

say: ‘And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but that he came down from

heaven, even the Son of man which _is in heaven_.’ In the same way

that he was in heaven at that time, he may have been in heaven with the

penitent thief during the forty days between his death and ascension.

786. “The history of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke xvi.) plainly

teaches that both the righteous and the wicked, at death, pass into

a _fixed_ and eternal abode, where no change is possible. No comment

on the passage is necessary. This portion of Scripture has a thousand

times been tortured out of its meaning by errorists of various kinds,

and as often has its testimony fallen back into the church’s healthful

stream of sound views. As a sheep, carried away from the fold, returns

when set free, so this passage always comes back again; for the voice

of a stranger it heareth not, nor followeth!

787. “In the Revelation, John, in his vision, saw the souls of departed

martyrs and saints ‘in heaven,’ ‘under the altar,’ ‘before the throne

of God,’ &c., and in the company of each other, of God, of Christ, and

of angels, in the central and highest heavens, and in that place where

the saints go no more out forever. Let it be remembered, also, that all

this is _before the resurrection_; and if the following passages are

carefully considered, they will leave no doubt on any candid mind that

the saints are, immediately after death, admitted into heaven. To quote

them all would be too tedious; a reference to them is sufficient: Rev.

v. 6-14; vi. 9-12; vii. 9-17; xiv. 1-6; xiv. 12, 13.

788. “For further proof still the reader is referred to Acts vii. 59; 2

Cor. v. 1-9; Phil. i. 21-24; 2 Tim. iv. 6-9; Eph. iii. 15. In this last

passage, the whole family of Christ is represented to be at two places,

in heaven and on earth; but according to the other theory, there ought

also to be some in Hades, or the third place.

789. “It may also be remarked that the misery of the wicked commences,

according to the Scripture, immediately after death, and before the

resurrection, and that their condition is unchangeably fixed. This is

evident from Luke xvi.; and also from that passage in Jude where he

says that those who had died impenitent in the destruction of Sodom

and Gomorrah were, at the time he wrote, ‘suffering the vengeance of

eternal fire.’ In like manner it is said of the righteous at death,

that they are blessed ‘from henceforth;’ and of those who were clothed

in white robes, having come up through great tribulation, it is said,

‘therefore _are_ they before the throne of God.’

790. “These passages are plain, and it would, in all probability, never

have been attempted to make them mean any thing different from their

plain sense, were it not for some difficulties, which, it is thought,

stood in the way of the doctrine that the souls of the saints pass

immediately at death into heaven. Let us look at these, and see whether

they are not fancied difficulties, which one glance at the truth ought

to remove:

791. (1.) “It is said that the soul, in a state of separation from

the body, cannot be in the same state, nor properly in the same

place, as it will be after the resurrection; and as heaven is to be

the eternal abode of the saints after the resurrection, it cannot be a

proper abode for them before. This objection has, however, no force.

There is, for instance, in this world, a great difference between a

person in childhood and old age, yea, before he is born and after, or

between his sleeping and waking state; and yet he is in all these in

the same world, in the same place, and is the same person. The state

and condition of the Saviour differs widely from that of any saint or

angel, and yet both are in heaven. So angels and human spirits differ,

and yet both are in one company and in one place. So in heaven the

condition of the saints before and after the resurrection may differ

much, and yet they may be, in both cases, in the same place.

792. “(2.) The saints cannot enter heaven, it is said, before they

are judged; and as the day of judgment is represented to be after the

resurrection, the saints cannot enter heaven until after that, and

consequently not immediately at death. We may, however, consider, as

is generally done, that the day of judgment is only a public and final

consummation of the decision of man’s destiny. Although God can, and

no doubt, does, for himself, judge and decide for each one when he

dies, yet it seems necessary for the glorious praise of his justice and

righteousness that all other intelligences should see the propriety of

his decision. This is necessary, that every mouth may be stopped; and

in order to do this he has appointed a day in the which he will judge

the world in righteousness by that man whom he has ordained.

793. “(3.) It is also said that the condition of many is represented

in that day to be undecided. Thus many are said to be disappointed;

coming to be judged, they find that their expectations of heaven are

vain, and they say, ‘Have we not prophesied, cast out devils, and

done many wonderful works in Thy name?’ Now it is said that if these

persons had been in a fixed state before, they could not have been in

doubt on this matter. The force of this objection is only apparent.

The representations of the judgment are after the manner of men, and

consequently our conceptions of it must be more or less according to

what we are accustomed to see on earth. The Saviour is warning his

hearers not to delay preparation for death; and, in order to impress

his solemn exhortation, tells them that many will find themselves

disappointed in their expectations in reference to the final decision

of their judge, and that their hopes of heaven, being built on the

sand, will fail at last. It does no more exclusively refer to that day

than the many warnings to prepare to meet the Son of Man refer to the

time of his second coming. He is always coming, and to prepare for

death is to prepare to meet him. So to find ourselves deceived at the

day of death is the same as to find ourselves deceived at the day of

judgment.

794. “(4.) Again, it is said that in some cases the full effects and

consequences of persons’ actions are not fully worked out when persons

die. Thus, for instance, it is known that the labours and writings of

many infidels, who are long since dead, are still working for evil;

and on the other hand, the labours and writings of many good men are

still working out good. These consequences must, in a certain sense,

come into the consideration of their punishment or reward. Hence it is

thought their destiny cannot immediately be decided. But to this it may

be replied that God, who judges, knows how these consequences will work

themselves out, and is able, therefore, to give a just judgment as well

at the day of death as at the end of the world. At the last day, when

all consequences have run out their history, it will be proper that

they should be exhibited in a solemn public judgment, that all may see

for themselves that all his ways are just and right. Besides, there is

nothing unreasonable or unscriptural in the belief that the happiness

of the righteous in heaven, and the misery of the lost in hell, will

increase in exact proportion as the consequences of their actions on

the earth are developing themselves, until the day of judgment, when

the cup will be full, and then the full draught of happiness or misery

will be taken finally and forever! Oh, what a moment will that be!

795. “Some additional considerations will serve more completely still

to answer these and other objections, and reconcile the serious and

thoughtful mind to the idea that the souls of the saints are in heaven

before the resurrection of the body.

796. “We shall only gain proper ideas in reference to this interesting

subject when we have corrected our ideas of heaven, for many of them

are evidently wrong. We are inclined to think of heaven as affording

to the saints a fixed or stereotyped condition, without attaching to

it the idea of degrees and progression. When we maintain that the

saints pass immediately at death into heaven, we do not mean that they

enter then upon their final condition, or into their highest state

of perfection, but only that they enter into that _place_ which is

their final abode. When, for instance, a child is born into the world,

it is in the world; but it is limited in its observations, actions,

ideas, capacities, and enjoyments, and yet all these are in their

state perfect; all its faculties occupy their place symmetrically,

and we have in the child a uniform but not a perfect being. Analogous

to this may be the primary stage of our future celestial history.

The child is in the world before it is born and during its infantile

years, but how different is it, and how different is the world to it,

from what it will be when all its faculties are ripe! So in heaven.

The child before self-consciousness appears to enjoy an indistinct and

floating life, but happy too; so may it be with our future condition

before the resurrection of the body. The condition of the disembodied

spirit will, no doubt, be somewhat isolated and lonely, (in a pleasant

sense,) its happiness being derived much, though not entirely, from

the flow of its own harmonious existence, and not from its connection

with things external. Its future connection with its body will arrest

its floating condition, and connect it again more consciously with

locality and materiality. Thus it will become more capable of social

relations and joys; just as the child emerging from its floating state

in infancy has its social powers developed by being furnished with

self-consciousness and speech, by which it learns intelligently to

separate and distinguish itself from the general mass of being, which

makes its enjoyments higher in their nature and more acute and sensible

in their quality.

797. “Perhaps the state of the saints previous to the resurrection

of the body, and in the first stage of their future being, may be

analogous to (but of course higher than) a state of ordinary sleep,

with active, pleasant dreaming. In dreams, the spirit acts and enjoys,

unconscious of the body; and may we not suppose that the spirit after

death may, to a certain extent, act and enjoy without the body? Perhaps

it may in this state pass profitably and pleasantly through the first

stages of its future history. It may, so to say, become habituated to

eternal things, and develop its spiritual capacities to such a degree

as to be prepared, at the time of the resurrection, to enter upon a

more tangible and positive state of existence. It may thus, also,

become acquainted with purely spiritual beings, and with the modes of

purely spiritual existence. This will be useful, because the saints

after the resurrection will be required to hold communion with things

material and immaterial. While the saint is in this world, in the

body, he becomes conversant with material things, and habituated to

them; now, in the other world, in a disembodied state, previous to the

resurrection, he will become conversant with and habituated to purely

spiritual existence, so that after the resurrection, when soul and body

are again united, he will be able to hold converse and communion with

either material or immaterial existences at pleasure.

798. “To this it may be objected that while those who lived in the

early ages of the world would have a long time to remain in this state

of celestial pupilage, those who live in later ages would have less,

and those in the last days scarcely any.

799. “This objection, so far from militating against this idea, most

beautifully illustrates and confirms it. Thus the souls of men are more

developed in spiritual things now, and will be still more in future,

than they were in the earlier ages of the world. Those who lived in

the morning of the world had very limited and indistinct ideas of

divine and eternal things. Their views of a future world, especially,

were exceedingly misty and obscure. As the church advanced, life and

immortality were more and more brought to light. Revelation passed from

types, shadows, and ceremonies, into brighter and clearer realities;

and spiritual conceptions gained a firmer and more distinct hold upon

the consciousness of men. The new dispensation was an advance upon

the old, as under the old the age of prophecy had been upon the

law, and the law upon the simple twilight of the patriarchal age. In

what a different light those who lived after the new dispensation

dawned, stood from those under the Old Testament, is clear from what

the Saviour says—‘Among those that are born of women, there is not a

greater prophet than John the Baptist; but he that is least in the

kingdom of God’ (in the new dispensation) ‘is greater than he.’

800. “At the present day, clearer views are enjoyed than were enjoyed

in the early history of the Christian church. Let any one read the

history of the patristic controversies, and he will see how the most

learned stumbled among propositions in search of truth which are now

clearly comprehended by intelligent Sabbath-school children. And so

it will go on into the future. Spiritual ideas which are as giants

to us, and the nature and relations of which we do not see, will be

apprehended by our successors at once. Thus, under the tuition of the

Spirit, revelation will show itself progressive, and new things, as

well as old, in reference to the spiritual world, will be constantly

and successively brought out of the treasure of God’s word, of which

the divine Spirit is the commentator. How, you ask, does all this apply

to the subject in hand? Thus the earlier a saint lived in this world,

the longer time for this heavenly pupilage he will have in the next

before the resurrection, and he needs more; the later he lived in this

world, the less will he have in the other before the resurrection, and

he needs less. Thus those who enjoy in this world superior advantages

on account of living under the clearer dispensation of divine truth

in the last ages of the church, shall not have any advantage over

those who had less on account of living in the first ages, since those

who had less will have longer time in the future world before the

resurrection.

801. “With this idea in view, the passage in 1 Thess. iv. 15 becomes

beautifully intelligible: ‘For this we say unto you by the word of the

Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord,

shall not prevent’ (that is, shall not go before, anticipate, or have

any advantage over) ‘those which are asleep; the dead in Christ shall

RISE first: _then_’ (when they have risen) ‘we which are alive and

remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet

the Lord in the air; and so shall we be ever with the Lord.’ Those

who shall live in the last moment, having had their spirits fully

enlightened and prepared for a future existence in the brightness of

the latter-day glory before death, shall not ‘sleep’ at all, for there

will be no necessity for it; but ‘shall all be changed in a moment, in

the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump.’ ‘The dead shall be raised

incorruptible,’ having been prepared for their incorruptible body, but

‘we shall be changed.’ 1 Cor. xv. 51, 52.

802. “This theory may be seen in the same way to illustrate itself

consistently when applied to those who are lost. Those who live last

in the world, when superior light is around them, sin against greater

light than those who lived earlier, and are therefore sooner prepared

to have their doleful station fixed finally in hell, in the union of

soul and body.

803. “The doctrine we present in reference to the condition of the

spirits of the saints in heaven, differs from the idea of a middle

state, in a third place, in several important particulars. It excludes

the idea of a middle place entirely, and of course all idea of

probation, which is generally attached to it in some form or other. The

state of the spirit in heaven, though imperfect, being the celestial

childhood of the spirit, is nevertheless final, and not probationary.

Our enjoyments there will be in exact proportion to our capacity; and

as fast as our spirits are unfolded, will our joys increase.

‘The more our spirits are enlarged on earth,

The deeper draughts they shall receive of heaven.’

804. “What an interesting moment to the spirit will be the moment after

death! What scenes will open up before it! The friends will stand

weeping over the now tenantless body, but the spirit is—oh!

‘My thoughts pursue it where it flies,

And trace its wondrous way!’

805. “The Christian need have no unpleasant anxiety about what scenes

will open to him, for he knows that the glory which will then break

upon his astonished spirit will exceed his keenest anticipations.”

Experimental Investigation of the Spirit Manifestations Demonstrating the existence of spirits and their communion with mortals. Doctrine of the spirit world respecting heaven, hell, morality, and God. Also, the influence of Scripture on the morals of Christians. · 第 75 / 115 题