“Cottages were forbidden to be built; some pulled down when empty, and

others fell to decay for want of repair; poor people were banished as

much as possible from the agricultural districts on account of the

burden of parish settlements; even in this county I saw the ruins of

two cottages, which I was informed were the two last cottages in the

parish.

“Under such depressing causes it is not to be wondered at that we

frequently received families into our employ who did not know how to

conduct (with propriety) a decent cottage in such a manner as to

conduce either to the health or comfort of the inmates.

“About twelve years ago we had occasion to introduce a considerable

number of families into some new houses; in the course of a few months

a most malignant fever broke out amongst them, and went from house to

house, till we became seriously alarmed for the safety of the whole

establishment. We instituted an inquiry into the state of the houses

where the fever first appeared, and found that from the low habits of

the occupants, and the ignorance of the proper decencies of life, the

cottages were in so filthy a state that it was apparent we should not

long be free from a recurrence of the same evil unless we took some

active means to effect a change in the habits of these people.

“Although we felt very unwilling to do anything which appeared to

interfere with the domestic management of our workpeople, still the

urgency of the case at the time seemed to warrant such a step. We

therefore ordered an examination of every cottage in our possession,

both as regarded cleanliness and ventilation, as well as bedding and

furniture.

“The striking difference exhibited in the state of these cottages, the

neatness and cleanness of some, the gross neglect of others, appearing

to have no relation to the amount of income, convinced us that an

occasional repetition of these visits would be essential in order to

effect any permanent improvement amongst them.

“These periodical visits have now been continued through a series of

years; and as no invidious distinction or selection was ever made, do

not appear to have been viewed in the light of an intrusion; a week or

two of notice being mostly given, a laudable degree of emulation has

been excited as to whose house bedding and furniture should be found

in the best order; my brother or myself have occasionally joined in

these visits. By these means we were made acquainted with the wants

and necessities of the various families in our employ. Having had such

opportunity of observing the great inconvenience arising from small

dwellings where the families were large, both as regards bed-rooms and

living-rooms, few cottages having more than two bed-rooms; and where

there were children or young persons of both sexes, the indelicacy of

this arrangement was apparent; we therefore concluded to build larger

cottages, and make them with three bed-rooms in each. These houses

were sought after with the greatest avidity, and families allowed to

remove to them as an especial favour; the increase rent of 1_s._ to

1_s._ 6_d._ per week was a small consideration in regard to the

additional comfort afforded to a family where the income was from

24_s._ to 50_s._ or 60_s._ per week, as is frequently the case with

families employed in manufactories.”

But I am enabled to adduce evidence showing that by structural

improvements of the places of work as well as of abode which present the

bounty on and security for future adoption, constituted by experience of

pecuniary saving, the health of the manufacturing workpeople, now

amongst the lowest, may be advanced to the average of health enjoyed by

any other class.

On my return from Glasgow, I proceeded to visit and examine the cotton

manufactory and machine-making works erected and carried on under the

directions of Mr. James Smith, of Deanston, near Stirling, the inventor

of the subsoil plough, to whose valuable opinion on the subject of

drainage I have already made reference.

The principle of the improvement of places of work, which constituted

the chief object of attention at Deanston, was the erection of

manufactories in one large flat or ground floor, instead of story piled

upon story as in the old mode.

Mr. Smith had constructed a new department of the cottonmill in one room

or flat, which covered about half an acre of ground. The roof was

composed of groined arches in divisional squares of 33 feet 6 inches,

supported on cast-iron columns, which were hollow, and through which the

drainage of the roof was effected. In order to render the roof of the

building water-tight, the outer superficies of the arches were covered

with a coat of common plaster, over which, when dried, was laid a

coating of coal-tar, boiled to a pitchy consistence, and mixed with

sand, laid on to a thickness of three-quarters of an inch. Over this was

laid a surface of from 12 to 16 inches of garden-soil, which prevents

the injurious effects on the pitch of the frost in winter, and the sun

in summer.

The height of this large room was 12 feet from the floor to the spring

of the arches, and six feet rise, giving a height to the room in which

the operatives were engaged of 18 feet. The height of the ordinary rooms

in which the workpeople in manufactories are engaged is not more than

from 9 to 11 feet. This restricted space arises from various points of

economy (now considered to be mistaken) in the old modes of constructing

manufactories, which were first erected in towns where land was dear,

and in times when the immediate economy of capital was of more pressing

importance. The adverse consequences to the operatives are the

restriction of space for air; that the heat and effluvia of the lower

rooms are communicated to the rooms above; and that the difficulty of

ventilating them is exceedingly great, especially in the wide rooms,

where it is found to be practically extremely difficult to get a current

of fresh air to pass through the centre. The like difficulties have been

heretofore experienced in respect to the ventilation of large ships.

There is also in the mills of the old construction the additional

fatigue of ascending and descending to the higher rooms, and carrying

material. To avoid this, in some instances, machinery is resorted to.

The ventilation through the side windows of large rooms is generally

found to be imperfect and inconvenient in many of the processes, and

annoying to the workpeople from the influx of the air in strong

currents. The arrangements for ventilation through the roof of this room

appeared to be highly advantageous. The light was brought in from above,

through openings eight feet in diameter at the top of each groin,

surmounted by domes or cones of glass, at the apex of which there were

openings of about 16 inches in diameter, with covers that could be

opened or shut at pleasure, to admit of ventilation. The better

distribution of the light for the work from these openings was one

advantage they appeared to possess over the ordinary mode of getting

light from side windows.

The chief arrangements from below for ventilation were made by tunnels

10 feet distance from each other, carried across and underneath the

floor of the building, and terminating in the open air on either side.

The covers of these tunnels were perforated with holes of about an inch

in diameter and 12 inches apart, disposed through the floor so as to

occasion a wide and uniform distribution of fresh air throughout the

whole building, on the same principle as that adopted for the admission

of fresh air through the floor of the House of Commons. In winter time

the fresh air admitted was warmed on the same principle, by pipes of hot

water, to prevent the inconvenience of the admission of currents of cold

air. The whole building was, from its size and arrangements, kept at a

steady temperature, and appeared to be less susceptible than other

buildings to atmospheric influence. The shaftings for the conveyance of

the power were carried through the tunnels, and straps or belts from the

shafts rise through the cover of the tunnels, and, by their motion, aid

in promoting the circulation of the air. The possibility of fatal

accidents from the persons being caught by the straps and wound round

the shafts, was by this arrangement entirely prevented. The tunnelling

under this arrangement constituted a boxing off of the whole of the

shafting. Another advantage from the removal of the driving-straps from

above was that the view over the whole room was entirely unimpeded.

Another structural improvement was in the use of a thin flooring of wood

over the solid base of stone floors. The floor so arranged affords the

solidity of the stone floor, and inconsiderable danger of combustion,

whilst the advantages of the wooden surface to the workers were a

diminution of swelled ancles and rheumatic affections of the joints,

often produced by working bare-footed on stone floors.

There were no entries made from which I could obtain for comparison an

account of the amount of sickness experienced by the workpeople in this

new room, but it was obvious that the improvement must be considerable,

and it was attested by the rosy and fresh countenances of the females

and of the workpeople generally. A considerable improvement was manifest

in the health of those workpeople who had previously worked in the older

and less spacious rooms.

The improvement of the place of work was combined with improvements in

the residences of the workpeople. About one-half of the hands employed

in the mills resided in houses near the works, which were well drained;

the ashes and other refuse was cleared away from the village every

morning between six and seven o’clock, and carried to a general

dungstead at a distance, for use on their gardens. On inquiry as to the

state of the health of the workpeople living in these improved

tenements, it appeared that they had not one-half the amount of sickness

experienced by the rest of the workpeople who lived in the common

ill-regulated houses about a mile distance. The whole population had

fewer diseases than any other class of the population in the surrounding

country; they presented fewer cases of rheumatism, and there were

scarcely any lung diseases amongst them: their general health was

decidedly better than that of the adjacent agricultural population.

The chief advantages of the improved arrangements of the places of work

were, on the side of the workpeople, improved health; security for

females and for the young against the dangers of fatal accidents, and

less fatigue in the execution of the same amount of work. But beyond

these the arrangement of the work in one room had moral advantages of

high value. The bad manners and immoralities complained of as attendant

on assemblages of workpeople of both sexes in manufactories, generally

occur, as may be expected, in small rooms and places where few are

employed, and that are secluded from superior inspection and from common

observation. But whilst employed in this one large room, the young are

under the inspection of the old; the children are in many instances

under the inspection of parents, and all under the observation of the

whole body of workers, and under the inspection of the employer. It was

observed that the moral condition of the females in this room stood

comparatively high. It would scarcely be practicable to discriminate the

moral effects arising from one cause where several are in operation; but

it was stated by ministers that there were fewer cases of illegitimacy

and less vice observable among the population engaged in this

manufactory than amongst the surrounding population of the labouring

class. The comparative circumstances of that population were such as,

when examined, would establish the conclusion that it must be so.

The first expense of such a building is higher than a manufactory of the

old construction; but it appeared to possess countervailing economical

advantages to the capitalist, the chief of which are,—this same facility

of constant general supervision, the increase of the certainty of

superintendence, and the reduction of the numbers of subordinate

managers, the increase of efficiency of management, and a diminution of

its expense. Another advantage arose to the manufacturer in the superior

action of the machinery. In mills of the ordinary construction the

machinery is frequently deranged in its structure, and put out of order

by the yielding and unsteadiness of the upper floors. The machinery

erected on the ground floor has a firm basis, and a steady and more

durable action. The other advantages presented were, the saving of

labour in transporting the material from one process to another, a

labour which is often considerable in expense, as well as in

inconvenience, in lifting it into the higher rooms; the reduction of the

hazard of fire, and consequently in expense of insurance against it, as

fire could scarcely take place, and certainly could not rapidly extend

in a manufactory so constructed. These several sources of economy Mr.

Smith calculated would more than compensate for any increase of

ground-rent, even if the building were erected on land costing 1000_l._

per acre. Mr. Marshall, of Leeds, on consulting with Mr. Smith, has

constructed a new manufactory (on the principle of that in Deanston) in

Leeds, where ground is valuable. This manufactory covers more than two

acres of ground, and is reported to be eminently successful. Power looms

are frequently arranged in buildings of one story, and I was informed of

another manufactory in Lancashire, nearly as large as that of Messrs.

Marshalls, built on one floor, but it did not appear to possess the

arrangements for ventilation and warming, and the other arrangements

necessary to the complete action of a place of work on the plan of that

at Deanston.

Mr. Smith considered that the principle of arrangement for superior

inspection and management of a manufactory was equally applicable to

agricultural operations, and that it would be proportionately

advantageous in the superior ventilation and equality of temperature for

cattle, in the avoidance of labour and wet and cold, in removing from

one small separate building to another, and in the transport of produce,

to have all under one large roof, where the whole direction and

inspection of the homestead farming operations are brought under one

view.

Of the manufacturing advantages of such arrangements I have had strong

testimony: of the advantages of such arrangements to the health and

moral and social condition of the workpeople, I could not entertain the

slightest doubt. I feel confident that the more closely it is examined,

the more clearly will the coincidence which I have endeavoured to trace,

of pecuniary interest with the health and the highest physical and moral

improvement of the lowest of the labouring classes, be established. Mr.

Smith avowed his confidence in this coincidence from his own experience

and observation as a practical principle. The improved health of the

workpeople was attended by more energy and better labour; by less of

lassitude and waste from relaxed attention; by fewer interruptions from

sickness, and fewer spare hands to ensure the completion of work. Under

the persuasion of the coincidence of interest, he had endeavoured to

direct the structural alterations to the promotion of the health of the

workpeople; he believed they might be advantageously carried further,

and had it in contemplation to make arrangements to promote habitual

bathing amongst them. He had, moreover, retained the services of a

medical gentleman to inspect the workpeople from time to time, and give

them timely advice, and, as far as possible, to prevent disease. He

agreed, and had long considered, that it was in the power of the masters

of Britain “entirely to extirpate excessive and habitual drinking. We

never,” said he, “permit a man to come near the works who is in the

slightest degree intoxicated, and never permit any one to be absent one

day drinking. You never can be well or cheaply served by a dissipated

workman. The most skilful workman, the man whose services I can the

least spare, must, if he takes to drinking, leave the place. It may

occasion immediate inconvenience and even immediate loss, but if the

rule be steadily applied, it will contribute to the comfort and the

profit of the master as well as of the man.”

The importance of such beneficent influence on the health, the moral

condition and respectability of the labouring classes, is so little

understood, that I beg leave to submit further illustrations of the

value of—

_The Employers’ Influence on the Sobriety and Health of Workpeople by

modes of Payment which do not lead to Temptations to Intemperance._

The power possessed by extensive employers of labour to influence

beneficially their labourers, is not however confined to those who stand

in the combined relation of employer and landlord. In the course of

another inquiry as to the means of preventing crime, it appeared that a

large class of crimes and disorders arose from drunkenness. On carrying

the inquiry back into the causes out of which the drunkenness arose,

they appeared to be extensively removable, and that by the employers of

labour. The important influences that belong to this position will be

displayed in the effects of alterations in detail in one point of

management, namely, the mode of paying wages. The direct sanitary

effects may be best displayed in the following evidence of _Mr. Lomax_,

an army pensioner, which has been corroborated by superior officers:—

“When I was in the Life Guards, 14 or 16 years ago, there was a good

deal of ill health prevalent amongst them. Before that time the men

received part of their pay weekly, namely, 7_s._ at the end of the

week. With this 7_s._ they had to provide the food which they

required, except their dinner. The ration for dinner was

three-quarters of a pound of uncooked meat, a pound of potatoes or

vegetables, and a pound of bread. It was found, however, that many of

the men spent the whole of the 7_s._ in a single day in drink or

dissipation. During the remainder of the week the men would be on what

was called the _crib-bite_, that is, living only on their dinner

rations. I knew many of the men who drooped under this system, partly

from the excess of drinking or dissipation, and partly from the

privation of the necessaries of life and the work they had to undergo.

This, again, led them to much temptation. If anything was lost it was

amongst this class of men that we looked for it. The crime-book would

speak as to the further bad consequences of these habits.

“The plan was then tried of paying the men 1_s._ each day. Over and

above that the men were provided with coffee. It was universally felt

that this change was highly beneficial to their health, and it stopped

the dissipation, and the consequences of the dissipation.”

The incapacity to apportion their means for temperate consumption (which

is not however confined to the working classes) is extensively shown in

the mismanagement of the means for procuring food. It is a subject of

complaint which frequently appears in the reports, that the ignorance of

domestic economy leads to ill health, by the purchase of unsuitable, and

at the same time, expensive food. We have been frequently besought to

obtain and promulgate, for popular information, instructions in frugal

cookery, and the management of supplies. It is observed by _Mr.

Brebner_, the governor of the Glasgow bridewell, where the cost of

maintaining the prisoners in health and increased strength is on average

only 2¾_d._ per diem, that

“The regularity of diet in the prisons here is of vast importance,

both as to the quantity and the time of serving it up. If the same

persons were to get the same amount of food for a whole week, or for a

less time, at their own discretion, they would suffer from surfeit at

one time, and from long fasting at another. Irregularity of diet is

one of the most fruitful sources of disease that occur in civilized

life.”

In further illustration of the beneficial influence which employers may

often exercise to assail such vices by regulations in detail, I cite the

following instances from a communication I have received from _Mr. Edwin

Hill_, the inspector of stamping machinery for the Government:—

“During a period of nine years (from 1818 to 1827) I was engaged in

the superintendence of one of the largest works in the town of

Birmingham, consisting of two distinct mills, one employed in rolling

copper for the use of braziers and shipwrights, and the other in

rolling silver, brass, and other metals. In each mill there was a set

of skilled workmen, who undertook the work at fixed prices, and who

themselves employed numerous assistants at weekly wages.

“Owing to difficulties in the way of making up the accounts at short

intervals, it was the custom for the master to advance weekly to each

workman in the silver mill a fixed sum of money (besides advancing a

sum to pay the assistants with). The accounts were made up annually,

and the balances due to the several workmen then paid. The payments,

both weekly and annually, were almost always made not to the men but

to their wives. The earnings of the men were considerable, varying

from 80_l._ to 180_l._ a-year. The men were, almost without exception,

highly respectable in their stations, their families were well

provided for, their homes cleanly and not without pretensions to some

degree of elegance, and their children sent to school at the sole

expense of the parents. Some of them had made considerable

accumulations of money, and even become proprietors of houses and

land. The workmen employed in the copper mill, on the contrary, had

been accustomed to receive the full amount of their earnings at the

end of each week, and, after paying their assistants, to divide the

surplus. These men were much addicted to drinking and feasting at the

alehouse; and, although their earnings were nearly as great as those

of the other men, their families were in wretchedness, and their wives

obliged to eke out a slender pittance by washing and other laborious

occupations. There were also several men employed as millwrights and

engineers, at regular and good weekly wages. These men were, almost

without exception, steady and respectable, and their families well

provided for. About the year 1822 the inconvenience and annoyance, and

loss, which arose from the unsteady habits of the second set of men,

led me to inquire into the causes of their inferiority to the others,

and I was soon led to attribute much of the evil to the great

irregularity in the amount of their weekly incomes, which varied from

about 10_s._ to 4_l._ 4_s._ per man.

“The effects were as follows:—The men were reckless, trusting to their

luck to get ‘good work,’ _i. e._, that which bears a high price in

proportion to the required labour. They were enabled to deceive their

wives as to the amount of money obtained. They learned the minimum

with which their wives could contrive to keep house, and, having

learned it, they endeavoured to retain all above this minimum for

their own gratifications. Their wives, under the pressure of

necessity, picked their pockets, opened their drawers, &c., in search

of money believed to be hidden. Their wives actually desired that

their husbands might get drunk on Saturday night, because they could

the more easily abstract the money from their persons.

“Upon the termination of my inquiries I induced the men, with little

difficulty, to receive their money in the way the other men did, viz.,

by regular weekly advances, rather under their average earnings, with

a quarterly or annual settlement; and I took care that the wives

should know exactly what their husbands would receive; and from the

day the plan commenced, a most decided and permanent improvement took

place in the habits of the men, and in the appearance and general

comforts of their families. One of the men commenced saving money

immediately. This man’s savings, as I have lately been informed, now

in January, 1841, considerably exceed 1000_l._; whereas, during the

five or six years which he passed in the same occupation before the

change of plan, he made no saving whatever.”

Report to Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State For the Home Department, from the Poor Law Commissioners, on an Inquiry Into the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain; With Appendices · 第 33 / 65 段