'FROM all my recollections of Mrs. SIDDONS, it would be absurd

to attempt to draw a parallel between her performances and

those of Miss O'NEIL; the unapproachable grandeur and dignity

of the one and the feminine tenderness and endearment of the

other exhibiting widely different expressions, not formed by

the same code. You approached Mrs. SIDDONS with a feeling of

awe, bordering on reverence. With Miss O'NEIL, all your hopes

and fears were excited, and certain to meet with a response.

Her bursts of agony and distress agitated every nerve, and

would plunge her audience in tears; while the power of SIDDONS

would choke your very utterance, and deny you all relief. What

Miss O'NEIL required in strong expression, she made up in

exaggeration. Every nerve was strained, and her whole frame

convulsed; in short, her great fault was exuberance; yet nothing

could be more quietly (though distressingly) beautiful, than her

performance of 'Mrs. Haller.'

The reader should have _heard_ Mr. ABBOTT present the subjoined

'limning from life,' and _seen_ him imitate the snuff-taking of

the noble tragedian. The story loses much of its force in being

transferred to paper. The anecdote is of HARLOWE, who painted the

celebrated trial-scene of 'Henry the Eighth,' in which the KEMBLE

family figured so conspicuously:

'HE had, by his ill conduct, lost the esteem of his great

master, Sir THOMAS LAWRENCE, who was the intimate friend of JOHN

KEMBLE; and the latter had in consequence resolutely refused to

sit to him for his portrait as 'Cardinal Wolsey' in the picture

alluded to. 'Mrs. SIDDONS and CHARLES and STEPHEN KEMBLE had

sat to the artist, but the great tragedian was immovable. At

length a friend of the painter (Mr. THOMAS WELSH, the celebrated

singing-master,) who had received many marks of attention and

kindness from Mr. KEMBLE, and who had great confidence in the

force of his influence with him, waited upon Mr. KEMBLE at

his residence in Great Russel-street. He was shown into the

library, and was most cordially received: 'My dear TOM, to

what am I indebted for the favor of this visit?' 'My dear Sir,

I come a humble suppliant to you, and I really don't know how

to commence.' 'Well, well; make excuses for your modesty: and

then, my good friend, come to the point.' The commencement was

auspicious; but the first plunge in a cold-bath is always hard

to take. 'I assure you, Mr. KEMBLE, I feel most grateful for

your kind reception; and if I could only hope the favor I am

going to ask----' 'Pooh! pooh! you know, Tom, I always told you,

from a boy, there was nothing you could ask of me that I would

refuse you. Now say what it is you wish; consider it as done;

and I really am very much occupied; so, to the point, to the

point, TOM.' 'Oh, Sir, you have made me the happiest person in

the world. Will you be kind enough to sit to Mr. HARLOWE for

your portrait?' In an instant a deep cloud passed over the noble

countenance of the great actor; and deliberately taking up his

snuff-box, he applied a large pinch to his nose, and quickly

replied: 'My dear TOM I'll see you d--d first!' Notwithstanding

his denial, however, the Cardinal is one of the best portraits,

and was caught only by occasional glances from the orchestra,

during Mr. KEMBLE'S performance.'

At Edinburgh, Mr. ABBOTT would seem to have attained great

popularity. He mingled in the best circles of the Northern

metropolis, and was for some days a guest of Sir WALTER SCOTT. He

narrates many pleasant anecdotes connected with his engagements in

'Auld Reekie;' and among them is the following, which is capital:

'I HAD no personal knowledge of STEPHEN KEMBLE, but I cannot

refrain from mentioning a circumstance which happened when

he was manager of the Edinburgh Theatre. The exiled family

of the Bourbons were residing at the Palace of Holyrood, and

great respect and attention were shown by the nobility in

the neighborhood to the unfortunate descendants of a long

line of kings. Mr. KEMBLE thought the patronage of the Comte

D'ARTOIS, afterward CHARLES the Tenth, would be a source of

great attraction. Application was made at the palace, and with

success. His Royal Highness left the selection of the play

to the manager, who fixed upon 'Henry the Fourth,' for the

purpose of exhibiting himself in his own popular character of

Sir JOHN FALSTAFF. One can scarcely conceive a duller play

for a Frenchman, almost ignorant of the English language, and

wholly unable to enter into the subtilties of such a being as

the Fat Knight. The great desideratum, however, was obtained.

The house was crowded, and the manager was satisfied. His Royal

Highness bore the infliction in a most exemplary manner, and

retired amidst the respectful greetings of the audience. A

week had hardly elapsed, when KEMBLE (probably not from any

selfish motive, but with the laudable view of affording some

amusement to the illustrious exile,) again presented himself at

Holyrood, and suggested another visit to his theatre. The Comte

D'ARTOIS received him most graciously; indeed, it was not in his

nature to do otherwise, for he was one of the most accomplished

gentlemen in Europe. He declined the invitation, however, in

nearly the following words: 'I am vara mosh oblige, Monsieur

KEMBLE; it was vara nice, indeed; I laugh mosh; _bot von sosh

fun, it ees enoff_!'

This dubious compliment of the Count is not unlike the praise

awarded by a polite French officer to a battalion of rather inferior

provincial volunteers in England. He was pressed for his opinion,

which he gave as follows: 'Gentlemens, I 'av seen de Garde-Royal and

de Garde-NAPOLEON; I 'av seen de Russ and de Pruss; _but by Gar!

I 'av nevare see such troops as dese!--no, nevare!_' With the two

passages annexed, the one describing an annoyance to which popular

actors are not unfrequently exposed, and the other the tricks of

which they are sometimes made the subjects, we take our leave of Mr.

ABBOTT'S 'experiences' at Edinburgh:

'IN passing through the gallery at Holyrood, where the miserable

daubs of the Scottish kings are exhibited, I was accosted by

a legitimate cockney, whom I discovered to be a traveller

for some furniture-maker's establishment. He had not been

long enough in his vocation to acquire the shrewdness for

which that class of persons are celebrated, but made up in

unsophisticated simplicity what they possess in assurance. He

recognized me immediately, having, as he said, 'frequently seen

me at Covent-Garden Theatre;' and without any extra ceremony

he fastened himself upon me. When he came to the portrait of

MACBETH, he turned quickly round upon our cicerone, and said:

'LORD bless you! that's not a bit like him; for I saw JOHN

KEMBLE _do it_, and it isn't so much like him as the moon is

like a Cheshire cheese.' But the climax of his sage remarks

occurred when the old woman came to the spot where DAVID RIZZIO

was murdered, and pointed out the stain of his blood, which

still remains, and which neither time nor soap, she said, would

ever efface. Our cockney rubbed his hands with delight, and

said: 'Why, my good woman, _I'll give you some stuff that will

take it out in half an hour_!' * * * One morning I lounged into

the box-office, which was crowded with persons taking places;

and on looking at the playbill of the night's performance, I saw

the tragedy of Isabella announced, 'Carlos by Mr. ABBOTT, _with

his celebrated hornpipe in fetters_, as performed by him at the

Theatre-Royal, Covent-Garden!' This was one of the practical

jokes of my friend MURRAY, (who married a sister of THOMAS

MOORE.) He had given the printer directions to strike off some

half a dozen bills of _this_ stamp, for the purpose of raising a

laugh against me!'

Soon after the retirement of JOHN KEMBLE from the London stage, a

great event, and well described by Mr. ABBOTT, that great tragedian

gave a memorable dinner to some eighteen or twenty of the most

distinguished members of the _corps-dramatique_ of Covent-Garden

Theatre. Among the guests, also, was TALMA, of whom we have this

graphic account:

'ON this occasion we had a fine trait of the tragic powers of

TALMA; not a bombastic display of French acting, but a grand

and simple narrative of facts, connected with that frightful

epoch, the French Revolution. He himself was suspected, watched;

and his profession alone saved him from the blood-hounds who

were on his track. During the most terrific period, he did

not dare to sleep at his hotel, but lived in the outskirts of

the metropolis; and when called in town by his professional

avocations, he would steal like a culprit to the gate of his

residence, and in an under tone inquire of the old Swiss porter

the bloody news of the day. On one occasion he was told that

some thirty or forty of his most intimate friends had that very

morning perished by the guillotine. Feeling that the crisis of

his own fate had arrived, he went tremblingly to the theatre;

and during the performance the overwhelming anguish of his soul

was relieved only by the tears coursing down his cheeks; and the

very expression of which feeling every moment endangered his

life. There was a cold, creeping chilliness about the hearts of

all present as he spoke, which was perfectly thrilling; and not

a sound was heard till he had ceased.'

Here is a brace of anecdotes of an absent-minded brother-actor,

which will perhaps 'agitate the risible organs' of some of our

readers:

'HENRY,' in 'Speed the Plough,' was a character in which he had

gained some reputation. At the closing scene of the play, he

rushes into a wing of the castle, which is in flames, in quest

of papers likely to disclose the secret of his birth. He returns

in fearful agitation, with his right hand concealed in his

bosom, and which in fact should contain the bloody _dénouement_

of the plot, a towel dipped in blood, _alias_ rose-pink, and a

knife, also properly stained for the occasion. The climax of

his speech ran thus: 'In vain the angry flames flashed their

vengeance around me! Among many other evidences of blood and

guilt, I found _these_!'--producing his fingers and hand! He had

entirely forgotten the essential accompaniments * * * His first

appearance was before Mr. DIMOND had quitted the stage, and

who enacted the part of 'Belcour' in 'The West Indian.' In the

scene with his sister the debutant should say: 'Are you assured

that Mr. BELCOUR gave you no diamonds?' The question however

was rendered thus: 'Are you assured that Mr. DIMOND gave you no

BELCOURS?'

Such errors, we believe, are not infrequent upon the stage. The

reader will perhaps remember the blunder of the Ghost in Hamlet, on

one occasion; who, instead of saying that the 'knotted and combinéd

locks' of the young prince would 'stand on end like quills upon the

fretful porcupine,' reversed the terms in this ludicrous manner:

'Your twisted and combinéd locks shall stand up straight, like forks

upon the _fretful quillcopine_!' A single passage more must close

our extracts from this delightful autobiography. It is a short

story, touching 'the immortal TOWNSEND, the first of Bow-street

officers, the favorite of Royalty, and the dread of all coachmen and

flambeau'd footmen:'

'I THINK I see him now, with his flaxen wig, his low-crowned

hat, long gaiters, and half-Quaker suit,' discoursing most

eloquent music.' It was a source of great amusement to the young

sprigs of nobility to extract from him in conversation some

of his most characteristic slang expressions; nor did Royalty

itself disdain to be amused at his expense. About the period of

the connection between the Duke of Clarence and Mrs. JORDAN,

public opinion was rife on the subject. His Royal Highness was

at the opera, surrounded by the world of fashion; and when he

encountered TOWNSEND, who was on duty there, he said, in his

brusque, off-hand manner: 'Ah! Townsend, Townsend, how d' ye do,

Townsend?' 'Why, your Royal Highness, pretty bobbish, I thank

you,' replied the functionary. 'Well, Townsend, what news, what

news?' 'Why, nothink, your Royal Highness, of any consequence.'

'Oh, nonsense! nonsense! The people must have something to talk

about.' 'Why then, if your Royal Highness pleases, the talk is

principally about you and Mrs. JORDAN.' The sailor-prince was

here a little thrown 'aback.' 'Never mind, never mind; let them

talk; I don't care.' Observe the simplicity of the answer: 'Your

Royal Highness is a d--d fool if you do!'

The foregoing is the result of a merely casual dipping, here and

there, into the teeming pages of Mr. ABBOTT'S manuscript volume.

Whoever the fortunate publisher of the work may be, he may calculate

with certainty upon its acquiring instant popularity.

'THE DIAL' for the October quarter is a very excellent and lifeful

number of that greatly-improved journal. Among the articles which

most attracted our attention and admiration, are the 'Youth of the

Poet and Painter,' 'A Winter Walk,' an essay on 'The Comic,' and the

'Letter' of the Editor to his correspondents. The first of these

papers is characterized by several thrusts of a trenchant satire. We

should rather infer, from the recorded 'experiences' of the writer,

that when he first entered college, his bump of reverence for

collegiate institutions and men of learning could hardly have been

developed. Hear him, how he saith:

'I SAW that in reciting our lessons to the conceited tutors, who

think College is the Universe, and the President Jupiter, they

had the impudence to give us marks for what we did, as if we,

paying them for so much aid in our lessons, were therefore to be

rewarded by them with a couple of pencil scratches. I found we

were treated, not only as machines, but to be set up or down, at

the discretion of these tutors, who had merely to scratch down a

mark, and thus decide our fates. This foolery I felt I could not

agree to.' 'I found here no scholars whatever. Some young men

deficient in grace, were wearing out the elbows of their coats,

in getting by heart some set lessons of some little text-books,

and striving which should commit them the most perfectly to

memory. This perfection lay in the point of a tutor's pencil,

and was at last decided on by the votes of a band of professors,

who loved wine and puddings better than literature or art, and

whose chief merit lay in keeping their feet dry.'

Perhaps 'these be truths.' Certain it is, that the annexed passage

partakes of the veritable. It is a 'picture in little' of the

morning routine of a briefless lawyer; and the sitter has many a

counterpart in this metropolis of Gotham:

'IN the morning, you enter your office at half-past eight,

read the paper till nine, and then, if you feel able, walk as

far as the court-house. There you are provided with a seat by

the sheriff, and cold water by the deputy-sheriff. You next

stare at the Court, consisting of one or more judges, twelve

jurymen, a criminal or civil case, four baize tables, and a lot

of attorneys. You next begin to make motions, which consists

in getting a case put off, or put on, as you happen to feel,

and run your eye over the docket, which is kept at the clerk's

table, in a ledger, for the accommodation of the county, and the

clerk's family. If it is your case which comes on, you open your

eyes wide, talk a great deal about nothing, and dine with the

bar. Occasionally you will feel sleepy after dinner, but awake

yourself by smoking a cigar, or driving into the country.'

Here is an extract which will be appreciated for its graceful

diction, the love and observation of nature which it displays, and

the pensive train of thought which its tone engenders:

'TO-DAY has been pure golden sun-shine since morning; and how

the day-god played with the trunks of the trees, as if the

forest were one great harp! In the morning, as I sat among

golden-rods, under the shade of a pine, where on every side

these sunny flowers grew, it seemed as if the sunlight had

become so thickly knotted and intertwined with the roots and

stems of the plants and grasses, that it could not escape, but

must remain and shine forever; yet the pine tree's shadow, at

sunset and before, fell long across the place, and the gay light

had fled, like the few bright days of life, which fly so rapid

by. The old tell us we are young, and can know nothing of life;

to me it seems I have lived centuries, out of which I can reckon

on my fingers the days of pleasure, when my heart beat high. I

fancy there is a race of men born to know only the loss of life

by its joys; to live by single days, and to pass their time for

the most part in shadowy vistas, where there is neither darkness

nor light, but perpetual mist. I am one of these; and though I

love nature; the river, the forest, the clouds, she is only a

phantom, like myself, and passes slowly, an unexplained mystery,

like my own consciousness, which shows through a want of perfect

knowledge. I see myself, only as what I do not know, and others,

as some reflection of this ignorance, an iceberg among other

icebergs, slowly drifting from the frozen pole of birth to the

frozen pole of death, through a sunny sea.'

Well pleased should we have been to accompany our observant and

thoughtful essayist, when he fetched his 'Winter Walk.' Mark his

delicate appreciation of the little accessories of the season. We

thank him for awakening vivid glimpses of the past, that go strait

to the fresh scenes of boyhood:

'THERE is a slumbering subterranean fire in nature which

never goes out, and which no cold can chill. It finally melts

the great snow, and in January or July is only buried under

a thicker or thinner covering. In the coldest day it flows

somewhere, and the snow melts around every tree. This field of

winter rye, which sprouted late in the fall, and now speedily

dissolves the snow, is where the fire is very thinly covered. We

feel warmed by it. In the winter, warmth stands for all virtue,

and we resort in thought to a trickling rill, with its bare

stones shining in the sun, and to warm springs in the woods,

with as much eagerness as rabbits and robins. The steam which

rises from swamps and pools, is as dear and domestic as that of

our own kettle. What fire could ever equal the sunshine of a

winter's day, when the meadow mice come out by the wall-sides,

and the chicadee lisps in the defiles of the wood? The warmth

comes directly from the sun, and is not radiated from the

earth, as in summer; and when we feel his beams on our back

as we are treading some snowy dell, we are grateful as for a

special kindness, and bless the sun which has followed us into

that by-place. This subterranean fire has its altar in each

man's breast, for in the coldest day, and on the bleakest hill,

the traveller cherishes a warmer fire within the folds of his

cloak than is kindled on any hearth. A healthy man, indeed, is

the complement of the seasons, and in winter, summer is in his

heart.' * * * 'In winter we lead a more inward life. Our hearts

are warm and merry, like cottages under drifts, whose windows

and doors are half concealed, but from whose chimneys the smoke

cheerfully ascends. The imprisoning drifts increase the sense

of comfort which the house affords, and in the coldest days we

are content to sit over the hearth and see the sky through the

chimney top, enjoying the quiet and serene life that may be had

in a warm corner by the chimney side, or feeling our pulse by

listening to the low of cattle in the street, or the sound of

the flail in distant barns all the long afternoon. No doubt a

skilful physician could determine our health by observing how

these simple and natural sounds affected us.'

We commend the following to those who seem to think that a thorough

love of the comic or the burlesque argues an ill-regulated mind

or a perverted taste. That there _are_ such persons, the reader

who has done us the honor to peruse our late confabulations with

correspondents, will not need to be informed:

'A PERCEPTION of the comic seems to be a balance-wheel in our

metaphysical structure. It appears to be an essential element

in a fine character. Wherever the intellect is constructive,

it will be found. We feel the absence of it as a defect in the

noblest and most oracular soul. It insulates the man, cuts

down all bridges between him and other men. The perception of

the comic is a tie of sympathy with other men, is a pledge of

sanity, and is a protection from those perverse tendencies and

gloomy insanities into which fine intellects sometimes lose

themselves. A man alive to the ludicrous is still convertible.

If that sense is lost, his fellow-men can do little for him.'

In the subjoined, which we take from the 'Letter' of the Editor,

already alluded to, may be seen one beneficial result of the 'hard

times,' which, driving men out of cities and trade, forced them to

take off their coats and go to work on the land, which has rewarded

them not only with wheat, but with habits of labor:

'SPECULATION is no succedaneum for life. What we would know, we

must do. As if any taste or imagination could take the place of

fidelity! The old Duty is the old God. And we may come to this

by the rudest teaching. A friend of ours went five years ago to

Illinois to buy a farm for his son. Though there were crowds

of emigrants in the roads, the country was open on both sides,

and long intervals between hamlets and houses. Now after five

years he has just been to visit the young farmer and see how he

prospered, and reports that a miracle has been wrought. From

Massachusetts to Illinois, the land is fenced in and builded

over, almost like New-England itself, and the proofs of thrifty

cultivation every where abound.'

There is much less of the new style of verbal affectations in the

present than in preceding numbers of 'The Dial,' and it is just in

this proportion the more readable and attractive. We see something

indeed of 'externality.' 'reäction inward,' 'unitive ideas;' and

certain compound terms, which are meant to be forcible, but are only

foolish; such as 'flesh-meat' for meat, 'foot-tread' for tread, and

other the like words; but they are scarcely worth mentioning; the

infrequency of their occurrence being a sufficient proof of the

decadence into which they are already falling.

* * * * *

'MEMOIRS OF THE COURT OF ENGLAND.'--We have in three handsome

volumes, from the press of Messrs. LEA AND BLANCHARD, Philadelphia,

an accurate memoir of the Court of England, from the Revolution

in 1668 to the death of GEORGE the Second. The work proceeds from

the pen of JOHN HENEASE JESSE, author of 'Memoirs of the Court of

England during the Reign of the STUARTS.' There are numerous and

fruitful themes of instruction and warning in these volumes; lessons

which have not been lost upon the world, and which are of especial

interest to the citizens of a republic; aside from which, the

details of the private history of some score of eminent persons, who

left their impress on the eras in which they flourished, must needs

have attraction for the general reader, who may only peruse them

with an eye to lively entertainment. We observe, by the journals of

the day, that the work is heartily welcomed and duly appreciated by

the public.

THE DRAMA.

PARK THEATRE.--We congratulate the friends of the drama upon the

bright auspices under which this establishment has commenced the

present season. Those who have long predicted the downfall of things

theatrical, and the utter extinction of the legitimate drama, find

but little in the present aspect of affairs at this house to flatter

their spirit of prophecy. So long as we continue upon the civilized

side of barbarism, so long will a true taste for the drama remain

with us. It is the natural food of an intellectual society, and as

such will be cherished wherever that society exists; the vagaries

of fashion on the one hand, and the railings of fanaticism on the

other, to the contrary notwithstanding.

The Knickerbocker, Vol. 22, No. 5, November 1843 · 第 11 / 15 段